POWER SOURCE T DRIVING Fd IRANSMISSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

POWER SOURCE T DRIVING Fd IRANSMISSION US0082390.97B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,239,097 B2 Yasui et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 7, 2012 (54) STEERING CONTROL APPARATUS FORA 6,349,789 B1* 2/2002 Nakano et al. ................ 180,446 VEHICLE 6,360,153 B1* 3/2002 Shinmura et al. ............... TO1/48 6,597,975 B1* 7/2003 Shinmura et al. ............... TO1/48 (75) Inventors: Yoshiyuki Yasui, Nagoya (JP); Hiroyuki 6,856,871 B2 * 2/2005 Mould et al. .................... TO1/41 Kodama, Kariya (JP); Kenji Asano, (Continued) Toyota (JP); Toshihisa Kato, Handa (JP) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Advics Co., Ltd., Kariya, Aichi Pref. DE 10235039 A1 2, 2004 (JP) (Continued) (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 German Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2010 issued in the correspond U.S.C. 154(b) by 170 days. ing German Patent Application No. 10 2007 000 319.8-21 and (21) Appl. No.: 12/174,281 English-language translation. (Continued) (22) Filed: Jul. 16, 2008 Primary Examiner — John Nguyen (65) Prior Publication Data Assistant Examiner — Brian J Broadhead US 2008/O281.491 A1 Nov. 13, 2008 (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC Related U.S. Application Data (62) Division of application No. 1 1/760,106, filed on Jun. 8, (57) ABSTRACT 2007, now Pat. No. 7,970,513. A steering control apparatus for a vehicle having a power Source for generating power, and drive shafts for transferring (30) Foreign Application Priority Data the power to driving wheels of the vehicle, and a traction control device for controlling braking torque applied to the Jun. 15, 2006 (JP) ................................. 2006-1656.65 wheels. The apparatus comprises a detection device for Jun. 15, 2006 (JP) ................................. 2006-165666 detecting the braking torque applied to the wheels, a calcula tion device for calculating a driving force difference between (51) Int. Cl. the wheels, on the basis of the detected braking torque, a B62D 6/00 (2006.01) power source state detection device for detecting an actuating (52) U.S. Cl. .......................................... 701/41; 180/443 state of the power Source, and a control device for controlling (58) Field of Classification Search .............. 701/41–44, steering torque created by the steering wheel, and applying 701/69; 180/443,446 torque steer reducing torque to the steering wheel. A desired See application file for complete search history. value of the torque steer reducing torque is determined, based on the driving force difference and the actuating state of the (56) References Cited power source. And, the torque steer reducing torque is applied to the steering wheel, according to the desired value of the U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS torque steer reducing torque, to reduce the torque steer. 6,032,755 A * 3/2000 Blandino et al. .............. 180,446 6,154,696 A 11/2000 Nishi et al. 4 Claims, 17 Drawing Sheets M1 M2 DESIRED VALUE OF Tes POWER STEERING ASSIST TORQUE DRIVING DESRED WALUE OF FORCE TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE MOTOR CONTROL DIFFERENCE FIRST CHARACTERSTC SECOND CHARACTERISTC STATEPOWER SOURCE T FORCEDRIVING - Fd IRANSMISSION Rt. STATE US 8,239,097 B2 Page 2 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS JP 2005-67455 A 3, 2005 2003. O158642 A1 8, 2003 Mould et al. wo WO SS A. $39. 2003/022 1898 A1* 12/2003 Yasui et al. ................... 180,446 2004/0167694 A1* 8, 2004 Tamai ............................. TO1/41 OTHER PUBLICATIONS 2006, OO15226 A1 1/2006 Bernzen et al. English-language translation of Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 18, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 2009 issued in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. EP 1331, 158 A1 T 2003 2007101107699. JP 5-77653 A 3, 1993 JP 11-129927. A 5, 1999 * cited by examiner U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 2 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 3 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 FG. 3 START 1 O1 INTIALIZATIONS O2 NPUT: SENSOR COMMUNICATION SIGNALS O3 PROCESS: SIGNALS CALCULATE: DESIRED WALUE (Tps) 1 O4 OF POWER STEERING ASSIST TORQUE CALCULATE: DESIRED WALUE (Tts) 1 O 5 OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE 1 O6 CALCULATE MOTOR CURRENT O7 MOTOR CONTROL RETURN U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 4 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 FG. 4 TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE 2O2 2O3 2O4 205 CALCULATE: DRIVING FORCE DIFFERENCE (AFd) 2O6 TORQUE STEER REDUCING CONTRO CONTROL: TERMINATED 21 O DESIRED WALUE (Tts) OF TORQUE STEER CALUCULATE: DESIRED WALUE (Tts) REDUCING TORQUE - O OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE numeroom RETURN U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 5 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 5 THROTTLE OPENING: LARGE ENGINE OUTPUT TORQUE (Te) THROTTLE OPENING: SMALL ENGINE SPEED (Ne) F.G. 6 FIRST CHARACTERSTC DES RED WALUE OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE (Tts) NEGATIVE POSITIVE SIGN(-) SGN (+) 1. DRWING FORCE < DIFFERENCE (AFd) SECOND CHARACTERISTIC U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 6 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 FG. 7 DRIVING FORCE (Fd): LARGE DESRED WALUE OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE (Tts) NEGATIVE SIGN(-) POSITIVE DRIVING FORCE (Fd): LARGE- DRIVING FORCE SGN (+) N-2 DFFERENCE (AFd) 1. M N DRIVING FORCE (Fd): SMALL FIRST CHARACTERISTIC Ttsm ------------------------- DES RED WALUE OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE (Tts) NEGATIVE POSITIVE SGN (-) SIGN (+) DRWING FORCE DIFFERENCE (AFd) - - - - - - - - - Y - - a -a - - - - - - - - - - Ttsm2 SECOND CHARACTERISTIC U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 7 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 FG. 9 GRADENT CONSTANT Kits 1 KtS2 DRIVING FORCE (Fd) U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 9 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 11 11 O NITALIZATIONS 1 1 O2 INPUT: SENSOR COMMUNICATION SIGNALS 1 1 O3 PROCESS: SGNALS CALCULATE: DES RED WALUE (Tps) 1 1 O4 OF POWER STEERING ASSIST TORQUE CALCULATE: FIRST DES RED WALUE (Tts) 11 O5 OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE CALCULATE: SECOND DESIRED WALUE (Tts2) 1 1 O6 OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE CALCULATE: DESIRED WALUE (Tts) 1 O7 OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE 11 O8 CALCULATE: MOTOR CURRENT 1 1 O9 MOTOR CONTROL RETURN U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 10 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 12 CALUCULATE FIRST DESRED WALUE OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE 12O1 READ: DRWING FORCE DISTRIBUTION STATE 12O2 CALCULATE: DRIVING FORCE DIFFERENCE (AFd) 12O3 FIRST TORQUE STEER NO REDUCING CONTROL CONTROL: TERMINATED YES 12O6 - 1207 FIRST DESIRED WALUE (Tts 1) OF CALUCULATE: FIRST DESIRED WALUE (Tts 1) TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE - O OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE RETURN U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 11 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 13 FIRST DES RED WALUE (Tts 1) OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE wom-m-ambor DRIVING FORCE DIFFERENCE(AFd) U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 12 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 14 CALUCULATE: SECOND DESRED WALUE OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE 3O 1 CALCULATE: POWER SOURCE OUTPUT (Te) 13 O2 CALCULATE: GEAR RATIO (Rt) 13O3 CALCULATE: DRIVING FORCE (Fd) 13O4 CALCULATE: DRIVING FORCE WARIATION (dFol) 1305 SECOND TORQUE STEER NO REDUCING CONTROL CONTROL: TERMINATED / 13O8 13 O9 SECOND DES RED WALUE (Tts2) OF CALUCULATE: SECOND DESIRED WALUE (Tts2) TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE - O OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE RETURN U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 13 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 15 SECOND DES RED WALUE (Tts2) OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQE DRIVING FORCE (Fd) F.G. 16 MODIFIED WALUE (Ttsh) OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE DRIVING FORCE WARIATION (dFd) U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 14 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F.G. 17 In MODIFIED WALUE (Ttsh) OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE O TIME F.G. 18 MODIFIED WALUE (Ttsh) OF TORQUE STEER REDUCING TORQUE Ttsm -- Thld TIME U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 15 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 Torv U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 16 of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 F. G. 20 WH2 KP2 U.S. Patent Aug. 7, 2012 Sheet 17 Of 17 US 8,239,097 B2 was or im pow we 1-HWHSBAIH0QN00BS||4__ + US 8,239,097 B2 1. 2 STEERING CONTROL APPARATUS FOR A On the other hand, in Japanese Patent Laid-open Publica VEHICLE tion No. 2005-067455, there is disclosed a method for reduc ing the torque steer when a traction control is being per This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. formed. Especially, referring to FIG. 3, it is described that if 11/760,106 filed on Jun. 8, 2007, the entire content of which it is determined that the traction control is being performed, a is incorporated herein by reference. This application claims driving force difference (AFdr) between right and left rear priority under 35 U.S.C. S 119 to Application No. 2006 wheels served as driving wheels is estimated according to a 165665 filed in Japan on Jun. 15, 2006 and Application No. known manner in a technical field in issue, and it is deter 2006-165666 filed in Japan on Jun. 15, 2006, the entire con mined whether the absolute value of the driving force differ 10 ence (AFdr) is larger than a reference value (AEFdr0 of posi tent of both of which is herein incorporated by reference. tive constant), i.e., it is determined whether the torque steer at the time of driving mode will be excessive, or not. If the result BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION is negative, the torque steer reducing torque (Tdts) at the time The present invention relates to a steering control appara of driving mode is set to be zero.
Recommended publications
  • Advances in Truck and Bus Safety
    EVALUATING THE NEED FOR CHANGING CURRENT REQUIREMENTS TOWARDS INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF LIGHTING DEVICES EQUIPPING SEMI TRAILERS Krzysztof Olejnik Motor Transport Institute Poland Paper No. 07 – 0135 the driven truck in relation to the unilluminated ABSTRACT objects. The similar situation takes place when The report has pointed out the need to manoeuvres are carried out in none lit up place and provide the truck driver with a semi trailer, the there are unilluminated objects either side of the ability to see the contour of the semi trailer and road vehicle. illumination in the insufficient lighting conditions. The need for equipping the vehicle with additional THE ESTIMATION OF THE SITUATION AND contour light and lamps illuminating the section of CHANGES PROPOSED. the road overrun by the semi trailer wheels has been assessed. The driver of the vehicle or group of vehicles should This is particularly important during have the possibility to observe the surroundings of manoeuvring with such truck – semi trailer unit at the vehicle together with the elements of the night to ensure safety, as the semi trailer has a contour of this vehicle – see Figure 1 [1,2]. The different tracking circle than the towing truck. drawing presented below shows these areas around Current regulations are too (categorical) restrictive the vehicle. and limiting possibility of introducing additional The driver should have the ability to observe them lights. The proposal for technically solving this during driving, both during a day and at night. It problem as well as amending the regulations, has should be possible under the street lighting and been presented.
    [Show full text]
  • C2101, C2201, C2103 & C2203
    INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS S/S COMPETITION TRACTION BARS P/N'S: C2101, C2201, C2103 & C2203 Competition Engineering Leaf Spring Traction Bars are designed especially for use in drag race classes that require a bolt-on traction device such as Stock Eliminator and Bracket Racing. These bars will eliminate wheel hop and improve traction by applying the force which normally produces unwanted tire spin into a downward force where the tire meets the pavement. These bars are capable of handling horsepower levels up to 450hp. They are designed with a snubber location that is positioned directly under the front spring eye bolt, eliminating spring damage and increasing the lever effect on the rear tires. NOTE: These traction bars may not work with the stock rear sway bar on some vehicle models. We recommend that you modify the bar to fit or remove it. PARTS LIST 2) Competition Traction Bars 4) 1/2" J-Bolts 2) 7/16" Square U-Bolts 2) Rubber Snubbers 8) 1/2"-20 Nuts 8) 1/2"-20 Locknuts 12) 1/2" Flat Washers 4) 7/16"-14 Locknuts 4) 7/16"-14 Nuts 2) 3/8"-16 Locknuts INSTALLATION 1) Check rear springs for broken leaves. Replace if necessary. 2) Jack up the rear of the car and place two jack stands under the frame member directly in front of the rear spring. Allow the rear housing to hang down with its weight on the springs. 3) Disconnect the shock absorber at the lower mounting point. Remove the stock lower spring plates and U-Bolts. NOTE: When replacing U-Bolts with the supplied J-Bolts, you must use either the factory T-Bolt or a 1/2" Grade 8 bolt.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Bulletin
    ATTENTION: IMPORTANT - All GENERAL MANAGER q Service Personnel PARTS MANAGER q Should Read and Initial in the boxes CLAIMS PERSONNEL q provided, right. SERVICE MANAGER q © 2019 Subaru of America, Inc. All rights reserved. SERVICE BULLETIN APPLICABILITY: 2018-19MY STI NUMBER: 04-25-19R SUBJECT: Torque Steer Diagnostics and Repair Procedure DATE: 04/25/19 REVISED: 08/28/19 INTRODUCTION: The primary focus of this bulletin is to provide a procedure to follow when diagnosing a customer concern of Torque Steer, defined as a pulling condition to either the left or right when under full acceleration which requires a somewhat greater than standard correction of steering wheel input from the driver to counteract. As part of this diagnosis, it will be necessary to first eliminate two other conditions a customer may misinterpret as torque steer. These are: Steering Pull and Steering Off-Center. This will prevent incorrect or over-repair, both of which can negatively impact customer satisfaction. This bulletin applies only in cases where the original factory equipment wheels, tires, and all suspension components are currently installed and, the outlined condition is confirmed to be present. SERVICE PROCEDURE / DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION: Definition of Terms: • Torque Steer: A pull to either the left or right during full acceleration (high engine torque) which requires a somewhat greater than standard steering wheel input from the driver to counteract and keep the vehicle moving straight ahead. • Steering “Pull”: A tendency for the vehicle to pull or “drift” to the left or right while at speed (not under acceleration) and holding the steering wheel straight ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Suspension and Handling Fourth Edition
    Car Suspension and Handling Fourth Edition List of Chapters: Preface to the Fourth Edition 3.8 Tire Uniformity 3.9 Aspect Ratios Preface to the First Edition 3.10 Tire Selection and Air Chamber Geometry Notation 3.11 References Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 4 Steering 1.1 Scope and Layout of the Book 4.1 Dynamic Function of the Steering 1.2 The Function of the Suspension System System 4.2 Steering Angles: Effects of Tire Slip 1.3 Suspension Geometry Angles and Steering and Suspension 1.4 Kinematics and Compliance (K&C) Kinematics 1.5 Vehicle Dynamics 4.3 Relative Positions of Front- and Rear- 1.6 References Wheel Tracks 4.4 Understeer and Oversteer Chapter 2 Disturbances and Sensitivity 4.5 Directional Stability 2.1 Road Irregularities 4.6 Torque in the Steering System 2.2 Influence of Wheel Size 4.7 Steering Torque Effects Due to 2.3 Subjective Assessment of Ride Steering Geometry 2.4 Human Sensitivity to Vibration 4.8 The Steering Column 2.5 Measurement Standards for Vibration 4.9 Steering Gear 2.6 Influence of Noise on Assessment of 4.10 Constant Velocity (CV) Driveshaft Ride Comfort Joints 2.7 Influence of Phase of Differential 4.11 Torque Steer Effects Vibration on Assessment of Ride 4.12 Front-Wheel Steering Oscillations— Comfort Shimmy 2.8 References 4.13 Power Assistance 4.14 Electric Power Steering Chapter 3 The Wheel and Tire 4.15 Rear-Wheel Steering Systems 3.1 Introduction 4.16 References 3.2 The Wheel Rim 3.3 Tire Size Designation Chapter 5 Suspension Systems and 3.4 Tire Construction Types Their Effects 3.5 Tire Properties
    [Show full text]
  • The Automotive Chassis Engineering Principles List of Chapters
    The Automotive Chassis Engineering Principles List of Chapters Preface 2.2.2 Radial ply tyres 2.2.3 Tubeless or tubed 1 Types of suspension and drive 2.2.4 Height-to-width ratio 1.1 General characteristics of wheel suspensions 2.2.5 Tyre dimensions and markings 1.2 Independent wheel suspensions - general 2.2.6 Tyre load capacities and inflation 1.2.1 Requirements pressures 1.2.2 Double wishbone suspensions 2.2.7 Tyre sidewall markings 1.2.3 McPherson struts and strut dampers 1.2.4 Rear axle trailing-arm suspension 2.2.8 Rolling circumference and driving 1.2.5 Semi-trailing-arm rear axles speed 1.2.6 Multi-link suspension 2.2.9 Influence of the tyre on the 1.3 Rigid and semi-rigid crank axles speedometer 1.3.1 Rigid axles 2.3 Wheels 1.3.2 Semi rigid crank axles 2.3.1 Concepts 1.4 Front-mounted engine, rear-mounted drive 2.3.2 Rims for passenger cars, light 1.4.1 Advantages and disadvantages of commercial vehicles and trailers the front-mounted engine, rear- 2.3.3 Wheels for passenger cars, light mounted drive design commercial vehicles and trailers 1.4.2 Non-driven front axles 2.3.4 Wheel mountings 1.4.3 Driven rear axles 2.4 Springing behaviour 1.5 Rear and mid engine drive 2.5 Non-uniformity 1.6 Front-wheel drive 2.6 Rolling resistance 1.6.1 Types of design 2.6.1 Rolling resistance in straight-line 1.6.2 Advantages and disadvantages of driving front-wheel drive 2.6.2 Rolling resistance during cornering 1.6.3 Driven front axles 2.6.3 Other influencing variables 1.6.4 Non-driven rear axles 2.7 Rolling force coefficients and sliding friction
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Power Steering System Design in Road-Analysis, Testing
    avhandling marro 2007/01/14 20:34phd_andjo page2005/08/17 iii 13:51 page 1 Link¨oping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations Linköping StudiesNo. in Science1068 and Technology. Marcus Rösth Dissertations No.1068 965 DesignHydraulic Principles Power Steering for Noise System Reduction Design in in HydraulicHydraulicRoad Power PistonVehicles Steering Pumps SystemSimulation,Analysis, Optimisation Design Testing and in andEnhanced Road Experimental Functionality Vehicles Verification Analysis, TestingarcuMarcuss andRs Enhancedth Rösth Functionality RoadVehicles Hydraulic Power Steering System Design in Marcus R¨osth Linköping 2005 Hydraulic Piston Pumps Design Principles for NoiseAndreas Reduction Johansson in Division of Fluid and Mechanical Engineering Systems Department of Mechanical Engineering Division of FluidLink and¨oping Mechanical University Engineering Systems DepartmentSE–581 83 of Link Mechanical¨oping, Sweden Engineering 2007 Linköpings universitet SE–581 83 Linköping, Sweden Link¨oping 2007 Linköping 2005 August 17, 2005 1 avhandling marro 2007/03/07 20:41 page i Hydraulic Power Steering System Design in Road Vehicles Analysis, Testing and Enhanced Functionality avhandling marro 2007/03/07 20:41 page ii avhandling marro 2007/03/07 20:41 page iii Link¨oping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations No. 1068 Hydraulic Power Steering System Design in Road Vehicles Analysis, Testing and Enhanced Functionality Marcus R¨osth Division of Fluid and Mechanical Engineering Systems Department of Mechanical Engineering Link¨oping University SE–581 83 Link¨oping, Sweden Link¨oping 2007 avhandling marro 2007/03/07 20:41 page iv ISBN 978-91-85643-00-4 ISSN 0345-7524 Copyright c 2006 by Marcus R¨osth Department of Mechanical Engineering Link¨oping University SE-581 83 Link¨oping, Sweden Printed in Sweden by LTAB Link¨opings Tryckeri AB, 2007.445 avhandling marro 2007/03/07 20:41 page v To my wife Jennifer M¨angden tror att allt sv˚arfattligt ¨ar djupsinnigt, men s˚a ¨ar det icke.
    [Show full text]
  • Torque Split Between Left and Right Drive Shaft Over a Front Wheel Drive Differential
    Torque split between left and right drive shaft over a front wheel drive differential Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Master’s Thesis in the Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Msc MARC OLLÉ BERNADES Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Vehicle Dynamics and Autonomous Systems Vehicle Dynamics Group CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2012 Master’s thesis 2012:21 MASTER’S THESIS IN VEHICLE DYNAMICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS Torque split between left and right drive shaft over a front wheel drive differential MARC OLLÉ BERNADES Department of Applied Mechanics Vehicle Dynamics and Autonomous Systems Vehicle Dynamics Group CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2012 Torque split between left and right drive shaft over a front wheel drive differential MARC OLLÉ BERNADES © MARC OLLÉ BERNADES 2012 Master’s Thesis 2012:21 ISSN 1652-8557 Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Vehicle Dynamics and Autonomous Systems Vehicle Dynamics Group Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone: + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: There is shown a brief representation, starting from the differential design, of all the steps that are followed (Modelling, Rig design, FEM analysis, Rig Test and Dynamic simulations) during this Thesis Work. Chalmers University of Technology / Department of Applied Mechanics Göteborg, Sweden 2012 Torque split between left and right drive shaft over a front wheel drive differential Master’s Thesis in Mechanical Engineering MARC OLLÉ BERNADES Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Vehicle Dynamics and Autonomous system Chalmers University of Technology ABSTRACT Steering feel and vehicle steering motion is affected by wheel torques from propulsion, especially for front wheel drive cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Torsen LSD in Conventional and Electric Axles with EPS Tuning (Electric Power Steering)
    EAWD’19 Torsen LSD in conventional and electric axles with EPS tuning (Electric Power Steering) Presented by Paolo Sacchettini JTEKT TORSEN EUROPE 1 Torsen is a registered trademark of JTEKT Corporation PROPRIETARY JTEKT CORPORATION Torsen LSD integration challenge topics : • New Torsen type D > achieves a new strength / compactness ratio landmark • Torsen LSD improves both Performance & Safety > maximize advantages & eliminate disturbances : & 1. "TOC" EPS tuning eliminates torque-steer while ensuring natural steering feel 2. ESC tuning eliminates initial understeer and boosts corrective yaw moments 3. Chassis tuning reduces initial understeer as well as unsmooth yaw transients + achieves adequate vehicle natural yaw balance 2 Torsen is a registered trademark of JTEKT Corporation PROPRIETARY JTEKT CORPORATION Torsen LSD integration challenge topics : • New Torsen type D > achieves a new strength / compactness ratio landmark • Torsen LSD improves both Performance & Safety > maximize advantages & eliminate disturbances : 1. "TOC" EPS tuning eliminates torque-steer while ensuring natural steering feel 2. ESC tuning eliminates initial understeer and boosts corrective yaw moments 3. Chassis tuning reduces initial understeer as well as unsmooth yaw transients + achieves adequate vehicle natural yaw balance 3 Torsen is a registered trademark of JTEKT Corporation PROPRIETARY JTEKT CORPORATION Torsen type D : robust & compact Size & Weight Reduction Smaller module & Lower helix angle Larger module & Higher helix angle 4 Torsen is a registered trademark of JTEKT Corporation PROPRIETARY JTEKT CORPORATION Torsen LSD integration challenge topics : • New Torsen type D > achieves a new strength / compactness ratio landmark • Torsen LSD improves both Performance & Safety > maximize advantages & eliminate disturbances : & 1. "TOC" EPS tuning eliminates torque-steer while ensuring natural steering feel 2.
    [Show full text]
  • SAE Vehicle Dynamics Technology Collection : Technical Papers
    SAE Vehicle Dynamics Technology Collection : Technical Papers 11th Annual SAE Brake Colloquium and Engineering Display 933070 Title: RTV—A friction material designers view 933071 Title: Practical evaluation and FEM-modelling of a squealing disc brake 933072 Title: Geometric induced instability in drum brakes 14th Annual Brake Colloquium and Engineering Display 962128 Title: Experimental analysis of low-frequency brake squeal noise 962130 Title: Development of correlation between experimental and analytical modal analysis of brake pads 17th Annual Brake Colloquium and Engineering Display 1999-01-3400 Title: Disc brake corner system modeling and simulation Title: A proposal to predict the noise frequency of a disc brake based on the friction pair interface 1999-01-3403 geometry 1999-01-3405 Title: Global NVH matrix for brake noise—A Bosch proposal 1999-01-3407 Title: Prediction of damping treatment dynamics as bonded to a brake shoe and lining Title: An experimental investigation of disk brake creep-groan in vehicles and brake dynamometer 1999-01-3408 correlation 1999-01-3410 Title: Calculation of average coefficient of friction during braking 18th Annual Brake Colloquium and Engineering Display 2000-01-2753 Title: Dynamic modeling of brake friction coefficients 2000-01-2760 Title: Ultra Q™process 2000-01-2763 Title: Cost-effective Aluminium MMC brake discs 2000-01-2764 Title: Modal participation analysis for identifying brake squeal mechanism 2000-01-2765 Title: On the analysis of brake squeal propensity using finite element method 2000-01-2766
    [Show full text]
  • Steering Drift and Wheel Movement During Braking: Parameter Sensitivity Studies
    Steering drift and wheel movement during braking: parameter sensitivity studies Item Type Article Authors Klaps, J.; Day, Andrew J. Citation Klaps, J. and Day, A.J. (2003). Steering drift and wheel movement during braking: parameter sensitivity studies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. Vol. 217, No. 12, pp. 1107-1115. Rights © 2003 IMechE. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Download date 24/09/2021 19:01:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/882 1107 Steering drift and wheel movement during braking: parameter sensitivity studies J Klaps1 and A J Day2* 1Ford Motor Company,Belgium 2School of Engineering,Design and Technology, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK Abstract: In spite of the manysigni cant improvements in carchassis design over the past two decades, steering drift during braking where the driver must applya corrective steering torque in order to maintain course canstill be experienced under certain conditions whiledriving. In the past, such drift, or ‘pull’, would havebeen attributed to side-to-side braking torque variation[ 1], but modern automotive friction brakes and friction materialsare now ableto provide braking torque with such high levelsof consistency that side-to-side braking torque variationis no longer regarded asacause of steering drift during braking. Consequently, other inuences must be considered. This paper isthe rst of two papers to report on anexperimental investigation into braking-related steering drift in motor vehicles.Parameters that might inuence steering drift during braking include suspen- sion compliance and steering o set, and these havebeen investigated to establish the sensitivity of steering drift to such parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • MINI Compare Models 2011 Specifications-Pdf
    LET’S FORGET ALL OUR ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT CARS. If you’re going to motor, motor in a strange and wonderful alchemy of steel, aluminum, graphite, dreams and sweat. Motor in something built by designers who used paper and pencil instead of computers. By designers who listened to their hearts, not focus groups. Motor in a machine that’s more than a pretty face. Every MINI is small but packed with as many features as some cars costing three times as much. Read on and soon you’ll understand that even though there are three different body types, the MINI is still in a class of one. Cooper Cooper S Cooper Cooper S Cooper Cooper S Cooper Cooper S Cooper S John John Cooper John Cooper LET’S BE SMART. Hardtop Hardtop Convert. Convert. Clubman Clubman Countryman Countryman Countryman Cooper Works Works ALL4 Works Convert. Clubman 6 standard airbags w/ side curtains: Smart technology knows which airbags need to inflate when, and at what speed and force* 7 standard airbags w/ side curtains: Smart technology knows which airbags need to inflate when, and at what speed and force* Active Rollover Protection Bars and reinforced A-pillar and frame Four standard airbags: Smart technology knows which airbags need to inflate when, and at what speed and force* Side thorax airbags in the sides of the front seats that protect the bodies and the heads of the driver and front co-pilot* Advanced crumple zones re-channel forces around the passenger compartment The latest generation 4-channel Anti-lock Braking System (ABS). Vented front, solid back.
    [Show full text]
  • Alignment Theory Manual
    Fundamentals of Suspension & 4-Wheel Alignment Interactive Multimedia Edition Toe Toe In Out Copyright 1996 Fundamentals of Suspension & 4-Wheel Alignment Page - 2 Personal Notes Table of Contents SPRINGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 TORSION BARS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 COIL SPRINGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 LEAF SPRINGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 AIR SPRINGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 SHOCK ABSORBERS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 MACPHERSON STRUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 CONTROL ARMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 BALL JOINTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 STRUT ROD/BUSHINGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 SWAY BAR SYSTEM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 STEERING SYSTEM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 STEERING LINKAGES ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 PITMAN ARM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 IDLER ARM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 CENTER
    [Show full text]