DOCSLIB.ORG

The Divided Kingdom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Divided Kingdom THE DIVIDED KINGDOM Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Problem ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Problem formulation ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 The analysis ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Delimitation ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Case Study Design ................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Discourse analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 10 3.2.1 Laclau & Mouffe ............................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2.2 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Document analysis ................................................................................................................................................. 13 3.3.1 Primary and secondary sources ................................................................................................................... 14 3.4 The role of opinion polls ........................................................................................................................................ 14 4.0 Theory ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 4.1 Neo-Institutionalism .............................................................................................................................................. 15 4.1.1 Historical Institutionalism .............................................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Decision-making theories ...................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.1 The Garbage Can Model ................................................................................................................................ 18 5.0 Historical context ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 5.1 Act of Union 1707 ................................................................................................................................................. 20 5.2 The Jacobite Risings .............................................................................................................................................. 20 5.3 Insurrection and Home Rule in Scotland ............................................................................................................... 21 5.4 Birth of Scottish National Party ............................................................................................................................. 22 5.5 The Kilbrandon Commission and referendum ....................................................................................................... 22 5.6 Scotland under conservative rule ........................................................................................................................... 23 5.7 The road to a Scottish parliament........................................................................................................................... 24 5.8 Political dynamic changes in Scotland ................................................................................................................... 25 5.9 Attitude towards independence .............................................................................................................................. 28 6.0 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................................... 29 6.1 Analysis introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 29 6.2 Revival of SNP ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 6.2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 6.2.2 An accommodating Tory approach ................................................................................................................ 30 6.2.3 Labour with mixed feelings ............................................................................................................................ 32 6.2.4 SNP on the big stage ...................................................................................................................................... 33 6.2.5 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................... 35 6.3 First Referendum ................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 36 6.3.2 A big chance for SNP ..................................................................................................................................... 36 AAU – European Studies 1 THE DIVIDED KINGDOM 6.3.3 Labour defending – and attacking .................................................................................................................. 38 6.3.4 A conservative defense of the Union.............................................................................................................. 39 6.3.5 Umbrella groups with little influence ............................................................................................................. 40 6.3.6 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................... 41 6.4 Thatcher and SCC .................................................................................................................................................. 43 6.4.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 43 6.4.2 Iron-willed conservatism in practice .............................................................................................................. 43 6.4.3 SNP – crisis and transformation ..................................................................................................................... 45 6.4.4 Labour forced to action .................................................................................................................................. 47 6.4.5 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................... 49 6.5 Second Referendum ............................................................................................................................................... 51 6.5.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 51 6.5.2 Labour riding the wave .................................................................................................................................. 51 6.5.3 Conservatives avoiding attention ................................................................................................................... 53 6.5.4 SNP divided over devolution ......................................................................................................................... 54 6.5.5 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................... 55 6.6 Birth of a Parliament .............................................................................................................................................. 56 6.6.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Divided We Stand POLITEIA
    Peter Fraser Divided We Stand Scotland a Nation Once Again? POLITEIA A FORUM FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC THINKING POLITEIA A Forum for Social and Economic Thinking Politeia commissions and publishes discussions by specialists about social and economic ideas and policies. It aims to encourage public discussion on the relationship between the state and the people. Its aim is not to influence people to support any given political party, candidates for election, or position in a referendum, but to inform public discussion of policy. The forum is independently funded, and the publications do not express a corporate opinion, but the views of their individual authors. www.politeia.co.uk Divided We Stand Scotland a Nation Once Again? Peter Fraser POLITEIA 2012 First published in 2012 by Politeia 33 Catherine Place London SW1E 6DY Tel. 0207 799 5034 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.politeia.co.uk © Politeia 2012 Essay Series ISBN 978-0-9571872-0-7 Cover design by John Marenbon Printed in Great Britain by: Plan – IT Reprographics Atlas House Cambridge Place Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1NS THE AUTHOR Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC was the Conservative Member of Parliament for Angus South (1979-83) and Angus East (1983-87) and served as Solicitor General for Scotland from 1982-88. He became a peer in 1989 and served as Lord Advocate (1989-92), Minister of State at the Scottish Office (1992-95) and the Department of Trade and Industry (1995-97). He was Deputy Leader of the Opposition from 1997-98. His publications include The Holyrood Inquiry, a 2004 report on the Holyrood building project.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Minute of the Meeting of the Cross-Party Group on Palliative Care in the Scottish Parliament
    Approved minute Cross-Party Group in the Scottish Parliament on Palliative Care Convener Vice Convener Secretary Michael McMahon MSP Vacant Patricia Wallace Approved minute of the meeting of the Cross-Party Group on Palliative Care in the Scottish Parliament Wednesday 6 June 2007 at 5.45pm Committee Room 1, Scottish Parliament Headquarters Present: Michael McMahon MSP Belshill & Hamilton (convenor) Roseanna Cunningham MSP Perth Jamie McGrigor MSP Highlands and Islands Douglas Pattullo Office of Jamie McGrigor MSP Philip Atkinson Scottish Health Magazine Dr Paul Baughan NHS Forth Valley Dr Rosaleen Beattie Scottish Executive Health Department Dr Pat Carragher Children’s Hospice Association Scotland Rev Stuart Coates Strathcarron Hospice Margaret Colquhoun St Columba’s Hospice, Edinburgh Lisa Dunbar Western General Hospital Margaret Dunbar St Columba’s Hospice Dr Rosalie Dunn NHS Lanarkshire Shirley Fife NHS Lothian Tom Gault St Andrew’s Hospice Linda Kerr NHS Ayrshire & Arran John Macgill British Psychological Society Dorothy McElroy Ardgowan Hospice Maria McGill Highland Hospice Elaine MacLean Care Commission Irene McKie Strathcarron Hospice Clare Murphy St Margaret of Scotland Hospice Professor Scott Murray University of Edinburgh Dr Euan Paterson NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Ros Scott CHAS Robert Shorter NHS Lanarkshire Craig Stockton Scottish MND Association John Sweeney Cancerbackup Scotland Hazel Taylor West of Scotland MCN for Palliative Care Elizabeth Thomas St Margaret of Scotland Hospice Anne Thomson Scottish Huntington’s Association
    [Show full text]
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 11 October 2011 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Masterman, R. and Mitchell, J. (2001) 'Devolution and the centre.', in The state of the nations 2001 : the second year of devolution in the United Kingdom. Thorverton: Imprint Academic, pp. 175-196. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.booksonix.com/imprint/bookshop/ Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 8 Devolution and the Centre' Roger Masterman and James Mitchell INTRODUCTION Much of the debate on devolution before the enactment of the various pieces of devolution legislation was parochial. It had been parochial in concentrat- ing on the opportunities, problems and implications of devolution within Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland; little attention had been paid to devo- lution's impact UK on the as a whole or on the `centre' - Whitehall and Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence from Nigel Smith to the Commission on Parliamentary Reform - Edinburgh
    Commission on Parliamentary Reform CPR_083 Written views from Nigel Smith Written evidence from Nigel Smith to the Commission on Parliamentary Reform - Edinburgh Introduction Summary I share the view of the Commission’s remit on the importance of checks and balances and the necessity for a distinct identity for parliament beyond government. From the outset, the culture, the founding culture of the parliament, was not that recommended by the Constitutional steering group with its emphasis on consensual working. Instead a more adversarial practice was established from the beginning and then intensified by the onset of the referendum and now its aftermath. The structure of parliament tends to over represent government in its affairs which might have mattered less in a more consensual parliament but given the founding culture, it has weakened the parliamentarians and reduced their effectiveness. Reforming procedures while obviously desirable may not be possible so adverse is the current culture. The result is the Scottish Parliament has been only a partial success, certainly less successful than we campaigners hoped for at the outset in 1997. It can do better. As Adam Ferguson said in 1782, ‘Nations stumble upon their establishments, which are indeed the result of human action, but not the execution of any human design’. Looking back at the experience of establishing the Scottish Parliament, I see all too clearly what he meant. There are many stumbles in the story that follows. The political climate in Scotland is difficult at the moment so the risk of being completely misrepresented is high. Nevertheless, I have resisted the temptation to write a ‘milk and water’ assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Msps with Dual Mandates
    MSPs with Dual Mandates Session 5 (5 May 2016 to date) MSPs in Session 5 who were also MPs Name of MSP Party MSP for MP for Additional Notes Douglas Ross Con Highlands and Islands Moray Elected in the general election on 8 June 2017. Resigned as an MSP 11 June 2017. Ross Thomson Con North East Scotland Aberdeen South Elected in the general election on 8 June 2017. Resigned as an MSP 12 June 2017. MSPs in Session 5 who are also Councillors Name of MSP Party MSP for Councillor for Additional Notes Tom Mason Con North East Scotland Midstocket/ Rosemount Appointed as MSP for North East Scotland on 15 June 2017. He replaced Ross Thomson who resigned on 12 June 2017. MSPs in Session 5 who were also Councillors Name of MSP Party MSP for Councillor for Additional Notes Jeremy Balfour Con Lothian Corstorphine/Murrayfield Resigned as a Councillor 4 May 2017. Michelle Ballantyne Con South Scotland Selkirkshire Resigned as a Councillor 30 November 2017. She became the regional member for the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party for South Scotland on 17 May 2017. She replaced Rachael Hamilton who resigned on 2 May 2017. Finlay Carson Con Galloway and West Dumfries Castle Douglas and Glenrothes Resigned as a Councillor 4 May 2017. Maurice Cory Con West Scotland Lomond North Resigned as a Councillor 4 May 2017. Page 1 of 8 MSPs with Dual Mandates Mairi Gougeon SNP Angus North and Mearns Brechin and Edzell Elected as Mairi Evans. Resigned as a Councillor 4 May 2017. Monica Lennon Lab Central Scotland Hamilton North and East Resigned as a Councillor 4 May 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps by Party Session 4 29 March 2016 Msps: Historical Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs by Party Session 4 29 March 2016 MSPs: Historical Series This Fact sheet provides a cumulative list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during session 4, arranged by party. It also includes the Independent MSPs. The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party in Session 4 can be found on the State of the Parties Session 4 fact sheet. Scottish National Party MSP Constituency (C) or Region (R) Brian Adam 1 Aberdeen Donside (C) George Adam Paisley (C) Clare Adamson Central Scotland (R) Alasdair Allan Na h-Eileanan an lar (C) Christian Allard2 North East Scotland (R) Colin Beattie Midlothian North and Musselburgh (C) Marco Biagi Edinburgh Central (C) Chic Brodie South of Scotland (R) Keith Brown Clackmannanshire & Dunblane (C) Margaret Burgess Cunninghame South (C) Aileen Campbell Clydesdale (C) Roderick Campbell North East Fife (C) Willie Coffey Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley (C) Angela Constance Almond Valley (C) Bruce Crawford Stirling (C) Roseanna Cunningham Perthshire South and Kinross-shire (C) Graeme Dey Angus South (C) Nigel Don Angus North and Mearns (C) Bob Doris Glasgow (R) James Dornan Glasgow Cathcart (C) Jim Eadie Edinburgh Southern (C) Annabelle Ewing Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Fergus Ewing Inverness and Nairn (C) Linda Fabiani East Kilbride (C) Joe FitzPatrick Dundee City West (C) Kenneth Gibson Cunninghame North (C) Rob Gibson Caithness, Sutherland and Ross (C) Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Christine Grahame Lauderdale (C) 1 Brian Adam died on 25 April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Magdalen College Record
    Magdalen College Record Magdalen College Record 2017 2017 Conference Facilities at Magdalen¢ We are delighted that many members come back to Magdalen for their wedding (exclusive to members), celebration dinner or to hold a conference. We play host to associations and organizations as well as commercial conferences, whilst also accommodating summer schools. The Grove Auditorium seats 160 and has full (HD) projection fa- cilities, and events are supported by our audio-visual technician. We also cater for a similar number in Hall for meals and special banquets. The New Room is available throughout the year for private dining for The cover photograph a minimum of 20, and maximum of 44. was taken by Marcin Sliwa Catherine Hughes or Penny Johnson would be pleased to discuss your requirements, available dates and charges. Please contact the Conference and Accommodation Office at [email protected] Further information is also available at www.magd.ox.ac.uk/conferences For general enquiries on Alumni Events, please contact the Devel- opment Office at [email protected] Magdalen College Record 2017 he Magdalen College Record is published annually, and is circu- Tlated to all members of the College, past and present. If your contact details have changed, please let us know either by writ- ing to the Development Office, Magdalen College, Oxford, OX1 4AU, or by emailing [email protected] General correspondence concerning the Record should be sent to the Editor, Magdalen College Record, Magdalen College, Ox- ford, OX1 4AU, or, preferably, by email to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Universiv Microfilms International 3Ü0 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer cf a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • I Bitterly Regret the Day I Comgromised the Unity of My Party by Admitting
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 FACTIONS, TENDENCIES AND CONSENSUS IN THE SNP IN THE 1980s James Mitchell I bitterly regret the day I comgromised the unity of my party by admitting the second member.< A work written over a decade ago maintained that there had been limited study of factional politics<2l. This is most certainly the case as far as the Scottish National Party is concerned. Indeed, little has been written on the party itself, with the plethora of books and articles which were published in the 1970s focussing on the National movement rather than the party. During the 1980s journalistic accounts tended to see debates and disagreements in the SNP along left-right lines. The recent history of the party provides an important case study of factional politics. The discussion highlights the position of the '79 Group, a left-wing grouping established in the summer of 1979 which was finally outlawed by the party (with all other organised factions) at party conference in 1982. The context of its emergence, its place within the SNP and the reaction it provoked are outlined. Discussion then follows of the reasons for the development of unity in the context of the foregoing discussion of tendencies and factions. Definitions of factions range from anthropological conceptions relating to attachment to a personality to conceptions of more ideologically based groupings within liberal democratic parties<3l. Rose drew a distinction between parliamentary party factions and tendencies. The former are consciously organised groupings with a membership based in Parliament and a measure of discipline and cohesion. The latter were identified as a stable set of attitudes rather than a group of politicians but not self-consciously organised<4l.
    [Show full text]