DOCSLIB.ORG

Redacted for Privacy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redacted for Privacy AN ABSTRACT OF THESIS OF Kweku N. Wilson for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in November 30, 2004 Title: The Underlying Differences in Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions Control and Renewable Energy: Three European Countries Approaches to Policy Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Joe Kerkvliet "It appears that the summer of2003 was very likely warmer than any other summer in Europe back to 1500" (Luterbacher, 2004). This was the conclusion of a study about the changing climate of Europe by climatologists at the University of Bern, Switzerland, and published in Science in May, 2004. The study collected and analyzed data across Europe including old temperature, soil core, and tree ring records. This study also found evidence that 50% of mountain glaciers have shrunk in the past century in Europe, and some ice fields lost 10% of their mass last summer alone. Even though Luterbacher's study did not analyze the effects of human activity on earth's warming, other climatologists, including Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University, a prominent advocate of the idea that most global warming is human caused, argue that Luterbacher's study agrees with models that have predicted the impact of burning fossil fuels and the release of greenhouse gases (GHG) on rising global temperatures. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a group of eminent scientists, unanimously concluded in their reports in 1995 and 2001 that 'there is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities' (anthropogenic sources) and predicted between 1.4 and 5.8 degrees Celsius (°C) rise in global temperatures by the end of the century. The IPCC also concluded that steps must be taken to control emissions from a specific basket of GHG emissions, namely, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), sulfur oxide (SO4), and industrial gases- hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs), per fluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). This consensus led to the birth of the Kyoto Protocolml997, at the global climate change conference in Kyoto, Japan. Despite the evidence of rising global temperature and its possible effects, some argue for more research to understand this phenomenon. The European Union (EU), conscious of the increases in global temperatures, is taking steps to reduce fossil fuels use, the main source of GHG emissions, and promote renewable energy, a major recommendation of the Kyoto Protocol. This thesis examines the differences in policies of Germany, Poland, and UK towards reducing GHG emissions and promoting renewable energy, and concludes that, even though the countries are pursuing similar policies, their implementation differs primarily because of their different idiosyncrasies and institutional make up. Lucas 1981 reached similar conclusions in his studies. I also found that the "wall fall profits" (German investments in energy efficiency systems in former East Germany after re-unification), the "dash for gas" (substitution of natural gas for coal in UK's fuel mix), and reforms in the Polish coal industry since 1988 have been the most effective GHG emissions reduction policies for Germany, UK, and Poland respectively. The GHG emissions reductions results of Germany, UK, and Poland, and their current GDP growth rates compared to other countries not aggressively implementing the Kyoto Protocol's recommendations, are evidence that the Kyoto Protocol can help reduce GHG emissions without significantly reducing economic development. © Copyright by Kweku N. Wilson November 30, 2004 All Rights Reserved The Underlying Differences in Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions Control and Renewable Energy: Three European Countries Approaches to Policy by Kweku N. Wilson A THESIS Submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Presented November 30, 2004 Commencement June 2005 Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies thesis of Kweku N. Wilson presented on November 30. 2004. APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy Coi.jttee Mlmber, representing Political Science Redacted for Privacy ttee Member, representing BusinessAiministration Redacted for Privacy of the Deartment of Redacted for Privacy Dean of t1dduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Redacted for Privacy Kweku N. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS "We all live down stream," this statement has over time become even more important to me. As part of living down stream, we all depend on the goodwill of others in many different ways. I would not be what I am today without the invaluable support of family, friends, and the numerous well-wishers I have come to know and personally admire. To all of you who believed in me, I doff my cap to you. Specifically, I thank my uniquely special friend Dilly for her unwavering support and fortitude during challenging times. From the depths of my heart, I thank my mother and the rest of my family both biological and adopted for all the support given me throughout my life. My life story thus far would not be complete without the generous support of Ralph and Wilma Hull. I owe all of you a debt of gratitude. I thank God for giving me the grace and strength to endure all that has come my way thus far. To my advisors Professors Joe Kerkvliet, Richard Clinton and John Moulton, and also Patty Pamell and Dr. Dale Myers, I thank you for your interest in, and enthusiastic support for this study. I must also thank the staff and people of the Economics, Political Science and the College of Business for their support and encouragement during my study. To all the members of my committee, I would like to express my highest gratitude for your willingness to help me through this. May we all in our own small ways strive to make life much better "down stream." TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter1.Introduction..........................................................................................1 Chapter 2.Literature Review.................................................................................5 Chapter 3.Overview of European Union...............................................................7 Chapter4.Germany..............................................................................................11 4.1-1Overview of Germany.....................................................................11 4.1-2Legal Reforms.................................................................................12 4.1-3Achieving the Objectives at a Lower Cost Comparatively..............14 4.1-4Incentives for Innovation.................................................................15 4.1-5Effects of Policies on Different Sectors of the Economy................18 4.1-6Global Positioning Purposes............................................................19 4.1-7Meeting European Union Membership Requirements....................20 4.1-8National Security Objectives...........................................................21 Chapter5.Poland..................................................................................................23 5.1-1Overview of Poland.........................................................................23 5.1-2Legal Reforms.................................................................................25 5.1-3Achieving the Objectives at a Lower Cost Comparatively..............27 5.1-4Incentives for Innovation.................................................................28 5.1-5Effects of Policies on Different Sectors of the Economy................31 5.1-6Global Positioning Purposes............................................................31 5.1-7Meeting European Union Membership Requirements....................32 5.1-8 National Security Objectives........................................................... 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Chapter 6. United Kingdom..................................................................................34 6.1-1 Overview of the United Kingdom...................................................35 6.1-2 Legal Reforms..................................................................................36 6.1-3 Achieving the Objectives at a Lower Cost Comparatively..............39 6.1-4 Incentives for Innovation.................................................................41 6.1-5 Effects of Policies on Different Sectors of the Economy................43 6.1-6 Global Positioning Purposes............................................................45 6.1-7 Meeting European Union Membership Requirements....................46 6.1-8 National Security Objectives...........................................................46 Chapter7. Analysis..............................................................................................48 7.1-1 Legal Analysis...............................................................................51 7.1-2 Emissions Trading.........................................................................51 7.1-3 Flexible Mechanisms.....................................................................55 7.1-4 Fiscal Policy Analysis....................................................................58 7.1-5 Environmental Politics...................................................................61 Chapter8. Conclusions......................................................................................67
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Author: Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 Published by: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford (Surrey) GU2 7XH, United Kingdom http://www.surrey.ac.uk/CES Publication date: 2000 © Centre for Environmental Strategy, 2007 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not of the Centre for Environmental Strategy. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. This publication and its contents may be reproduced as long as the reference source is cited. ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Paper prepared as background to the Study Renewable Energy Sources March 1998 Dr Tim Jackson* and Dr Ragnar Löfstedt Centre for Environmental Strategy University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the thinking of the Royal Commission. Any queries about the paper should be directed to the author indicated * above. Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accurate transposition of the written reports onto the website, the Royal Commission cannot be held responsible for any accidental errors which might have been introduced during the transcription. Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Renewable Energy Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus
    Who Pays? Consumer attitudes to the growth of levies to fund environmental and social energy policy objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus Consumer Focus is the statutory Following the recent consumer and consumer champion for England, Wales, competition reforms, the Government Scotland and (for postal consumers) has asked Consumer Focus to establish Northern Ireland. a new Regulated Industries Unit by April 2013 to represent consumers’ interests in We operate across the whole of the complex, regulated markets sectors. The economy, persuading businesses, Citizens Advice service will take on our public services and policy-makers to role in other markets from April 2013. put consumers at the heart of what they do. We tackle the issues that matter to Our Annual Plan for 2012/13 is available consumers, and give people a stronger online, consumerfocus.org.uk voice. We don’t just draw attention to problems – we work with consumers and with a range of organisations to champion creative solutions that make a difference to consumers’ lives. For regular updates from Consumer Focus, sign up to our monthly e-newsletter by emailing [email protected] or follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/consumerfocus Consumer Focus Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 Background ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy and Biomass
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory Global (International) Energy Policy and Biomass Ralph P. Overend National Renewable Energy Laboratory California Biomass Collaboration – First Annual Forum January 8th , 2004 Sacramento, CA. NREL/PR-510-35561 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Understanding Policy • Policies are applied against uncertain futures! • Can be – EXPLICIT as in having an “Energy Policy” •OR – IMPLICIT derived from the sum total of previous actions • Biomass Specific Policy – At the Intersection of several policies and jurisdictions • Energy • Environment • Land Use – Agriculture – Forestry – Rural Development • Urban •ZEN Rules – not having an Explicit policy can still be an Energy Policy! – However well meaning a policy – there is a law of unintended consequences World TPES 2000 (Total Primary Energy Supply = 448 EJ) • Food TPES – 2700 Cal/person/day 6% 2% – Popn. 6.1 Billion 6% • Source for Food TPES 35% –FAO.org 10% • Nuclear conversion – kWh = 10.8 MJ • Hydro conversion 19% –kWh = 3.6 MJ • source for fuel TPES (9700 22% Mtoe) – Iea.org Oil Coal N.Gas Biomass Food Nuclear Hydro Business as Usual - World Energy according to IEA WEO2002 • 2030 time horizon • TPES grows at 1.7%/a from 9179 – 15267 Mtoe – No shortage of traditional fossil fuel resources (see next slide) – Requires considerable investment > 17 T$ (2002) • About 1% of global GDP • 50% goes for infrastructure replacement • Electricity system needs about 10 T$ (50% in T&D) • Oil and Gas each about 3
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE JUSTICE: the International Momentum Towards Climate Litigation
    CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Paris Agreement is ground breaking yet contradictory. In an era of fractured multilateralism it achieved above and beyond what was considered politically possible – yet it stopped far short of what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change. In the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5C, yet the mitigation pledges on the table at Paris will result in roughly 3C of warming, with insufficient finance to implement those pledges. The Paris Agreement was widely acknowledged to signal the end of the fossil fuel era, yet it does not explicitly use the words ‘fossil fuels’ throughout the entire document, nor does it contain any binding requirements that governments commit to any concrete climate recovery steps. Now, citizens and governments are beginning to seek redress in court with ground breaking cases emerging around the world, in a whole new area of litigation, some of which can be compared with the beginnings of - and based on some of the legal precedents set by - legal action against the tobacco industry. Other new strategies are focused not only on private industry but on the sovereign responsibility of governments to preserve constitutional and public trust rights to a stable climate and healthy atmosphere on behalf of both present and future generations. Climate litigation has spread beyond the US into new jurisdictions throughout Asia, the Pacific and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Going, Going, Gone
    Going, Going, Gone The role of auctions and competition in renewable electricity support Simon Moore Edited by Guy Newey Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Danny Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), David Meller (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Charles Stewart Smith and Simon Wolfson. About the Authors Simon Moore joined Policy Exchange in August 2010 as a Research Fellow for the Environment & Energy Unit. Before joining Policy Exchange, Simon worked for London-based think tank The Stockholm Network. He has a Master’s degree in Public Policy from the University of Maryland and a Bachelor’s degree in Politics from Lancaster University, where he was awarded the Oakeshott Prize for best overall performance in political theory and comparative politics. Guy Newey is Head of Environment and Energy at Policy Exchange. Before joining Policy Exchange, Guy worked as a journalist, including three years as a foreign correspondent in Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2018 Energy Prices In February 2018 the Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill was introduced to Parliament, which will put in place a requirement on the independent regulator, Ofgem, to cap energy tariffs until 2020. It will mean an absolute cap can be set on poor value tariffs, protecting the 11 million households in England, Wales and Scotland who are currently on a standard variable or other default energy tariff and who are not protected by existing price caps. An extension to Ofgem’s safeguard tariff cap was introduced in February 2018 which will see a further one million more vulnerable consumers protected from unfair energy price rises. Nuclear In June 2018 the Government announced a deal with the nuclear sector to ensure that nuclear energy continues to power the UK for years to come through major innovation, cutting-edge technology and ensuring a diverse and highly-skilled workforce. Key elements include: • a £200 million Nuclear Sector Deal to secure the UK’s diverse energy mix and drive down the costs of nuclear energy meaning cheaper energy bills for customers; • a £32 million boost from government and industry to kick-start a new advanced manufacturing programme including R&D investment to develop potential world-leading nuclear technologies like advanced modular reactors; • a commitment to increasing gender diversity with a target of 40% women working in the civil nuclear sector by 2030. 2017 Energy Policy In October 2017 the Government published The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future, which aims to cut emissions while keeping costs down for consumers, creating good jobs and growing the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Submitted by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (WIND 01)
    Energy and Climate Change Committee The Economics of Wind Power written evidence REF: Page WIND 01 Department of Energy and Climate Change 5 WIND 02 Maureen Beaumont 9 WIND 03 D E Simmons CEng; MIMechE; CMIOSH; RMaPS 11 WIND 04 Galloway Landscape And Renewable Energy (GLARE) 12 WIND 05 Dr. Ian Woollen 15 WIND 06 Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) 16 WIND 07 Viscount Monckton of Brenchley 18 WIND 08 ABB 21 WIND 09 Roland Heap 24 WIND 10 David Campbell 29 WIND 11 The Renewable Energy Foundation 31 WIND 12 Brian Skittrall 34 WIND 13 Sir Donald Miller 37 WIND 14 Hengistbury Residents' Association (HENRA) 40 WIND 15 Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy ‐ UK 43 WIND 16 REG Windpower Ltd 46 WIND 17 Adrian J Snook 52 WIND 18 Montgomeryshire Local Council Forum; Welshpool Town Council 55 WIND 19 Ian W Murdoch 57 WIND 20 Mrs Brenda Herrick 60 WIND 21 Mr N W Woolmington 62 WIND 22 Professor Jack W Ponton FREng 63 WIND 23 Mrs Anne Rogers 65 WIND 24 Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) 67 WIND 25 Derek Partington 70 WIND 26 Professor Michael Jefferson 76 WIND 27 Robert Beith CEng FIMechE, FIMarE, FEI and Michael Knowles CEng 78 WIND 28 Barry Smith FCCA 81 WIND 29 The Wildlife Trusts (TWT) 83 WIND 30 Wyck Gerson Lohman 87 WIND 31 Brett Kibble 90 WIND 32 W P Rees BSc. CEng MIET 92 WIND 33 Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management 95 WIND 34 Councillor Ann Cowan 98 WIND 35 Ian M Thompson 99 WIND 36 E.ON UK plc 102 WIND 37 Brian D Crosby 105 WIND 38 Peter Ashcroft 106 WIND 39 Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) 109 WIND 40 Scottish Renewables 110 WIND 41 Greenpeace UK; World Wildlife Fund; Friends of the Earth 114 WIND 42 Wales and Borders Alliance 119 WIND 43 National Opposition to Windfarms 121 WIND 44 David Milborrow 124 WIND 45 SSE 126 WIND 46 Dr Howard Ferguson 129 WIND 47 Grantham Research Institute 132 WIND 48 George F Wood 135 WIND 49 Greenersky.
    [Show full text]
  • Etsu/K/Bd/00187/Rep Establishing a Local
    ESTABLISHING A LOCAL AUTHORITY MARKET FOR GREEN POWER ETSU/K/BD/00187/REP Contractor ESD Ltd Prepared by A Turnbull N Evans The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry First Published 1999 © Crown Copyright 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this project is to establish how to maximise the potential local authority (LA) market for green power by examining the procurement and supply issues, and identifying ways to overcome the potential barriers faced both by LAs (as purchasers) and potential green electricity suppliers. To do this, it is important to understand how LAs normally procure goods and services and how power suppliers normally supply electricity. Once these two processes are understood, it is much easier to understand the issues for a LA wishing to procure green energy and for a power supplier wishing to provide green electricity, instead of buying or supplying conventional electricity. The first stage of the project was to assess the procurement processes of the LAs. This review of LA energy procurement processes resulted in a report covering the following: • background to LA structure and how this may influence procurement practices; • the liberalised market opportunities for renewable energy; • current purchasing arrangements, particularly the important role of the Standing Order; • data requirements for LAs preparing tenders; • options for, and barriers to, purchasing green energy; • conclusions, covering how the current procurement practices can be adapted to promote the procurement of green energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power: Your Questions Answered
    Wind power: your questions answered Proven Energy Proven Getty Getty DID YOU KNOW? Many environmental organisations recognise the importance of wind power as an essential component of our strategy to fight climate change, including Natural England, the RSPB and WWF. Renewable UK has worked with these organisations to provide guidance on designated areas and wind developments. See page 19 for contact details. Global warming: time for action Climate change is the biggest and most urgent environmental threat we face. The greenhouse gases responsible are caused by human activity. The most important is carbon dioxide (CO2) which is produced when we burn fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas for energy. Rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are causing increases in global temperatures, leading to more severe weather patterns such as floods, droughts and storms, rising sea levels and threats to entire ecosystems. To avoid catastrophic climate change we must curb rising global emissions within the next 10 years. This means we need to About Friends of the Earth switch to forms of energy that do not produce CO2. In the UK around a third of our emissions of CO2 come from power stations which are producing electricity. Other emissions from these stations pollute the air we breathe and For more than 40 years we’ve seen that the contribute to acid rain which threatens wildlife. Our demand well-being of people and planet go hand for energy is higher than ever. Even if we make massive in hand – and it’s been the inspiration for improvements in energy efficiency, it’s vital that we find our campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 12 Wind Energy Markets
    30 Years of Policies for Wind Energy Lessons from 12 Wind Energy Markets IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency Copyright (c) IRENA 2013 Unless otherwise indicated, material in this publication may be used freely, shared or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested. IRENA and GWEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from IRENA/GWEC. Any omissions and errors are solely the responsibility of the authors. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the International Renewable Energy Agency concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in this material also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. 2 IRENA-GWEC: 30 YEARS OF POLICIES FOR WIND ENERGY ABOUT IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) promotes the accelerated adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy. IRENA’s founding members were inspired by the opportunities offered by renewable energy to enable sustainable development while addressing issues of energy access, security and volatility. Established in 2009, the intergovernmental organisation provides a global networking hub, advisory resource and unified voice for renewable energy. www.irena.org REPORT CONCEPT AND EDITORIAL VIEW This report was commissioned by IRENA and produced in collaboration with the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR 9, rue de la Fédération, ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France AND DEVELOPMENT The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris autonomous body which was established in November on 14th December 1960, and which came into force 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall implement an international energy programme. promote policies designed: It carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co- • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth operation among twenty-six* of the OECD’s thirty and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries. The basic aims of the IEA are: Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development • to maintain and improve systems for coping with oil of the world economy; supply disruptions; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in • to promote rational energy policies in a global Member as well as non-member countries in the context through co-operative relations with non- process of economic development; and member countries, industry and international organisations; • to contribute to the expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy
    Renewable energy Prepared by Audit Scotland September 2013 Auditor General for Scotland The Auditor General’s role is to: • appoint auditors to Scotland’s central government and NHS bodies • examine how public bodies spend public money • help them to manage their finances to the highest standards • check whether they achieve value for money. The Auditor General is independent and reports to the Scottish Parliament on the performance of: • directorates of the Scottish Government • government agencies, eg the Scottish Prison Service, Historic Scotland • NHS bodies • further education colleges • Scottish Water • NDPBs and others, eg Scottish Police Authority, Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. You can find out more about the work of the Auditor General on our website: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/about/ags Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. We help the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission check that organisations spending public money use it properly, efficiently and effectively. Renewable energy | 3 Contents Summary 4 Key messages 5 Part 1. Background 7 Part 2. Leadership 11 Part 3. Funding 17 Part 4. Performance 24 Endnotes 37 Appendix 1. Audit methodology 39 Appendix 2. Membership of the advisory group 41 Exhibit data When viewing this report online, you can access background data by clicking on the graph icon. The data file will open in a new window. 4 | Summary Key facts Total public sector budget for 2013/14 and 2014/15 £264 million
    [Show full text]