FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • NUMBER 38

Friday, February 25, 1966 • Washington, D.C. Pages 3107-3170

Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Emergency Planning Office Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interior Department International Commerce Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Post Office Department Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list of Contents appears inside.

/934 Just Released

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

(As of January 1, 1966) .

Title 7—Agriculture (Parts 46-51) (Revised) $1.00

Title 46—Shipping (Parts 146-149) (Revised) $2.50

A Cumulative Checklist of CFR issuances for 1966 appears in the first issue of each month under Title 1.

Order from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.O. 20402

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FERERALWREGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261 Archives BuUding, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin- istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cents for each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code of F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pur­ suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of F ederal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first Federal R egister issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code of F ederal Regulations. Contents

Notices Hazardous substances; exemption THE PRESIDENT Humanely slaughtered livestock; from labeling requirements: identification of carcasses; Cigarette lighters containing EXECUTIVE ORDER changes in list of establish- butane and/or isobutane___ 3116 To exempt employees of the Postal ments______3138 Felt pads impregnated with Field Service from certain pro­ ethylene glycol______3117 visions of Executive Order 10358, EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICE Propylene glycol and glycerin; as amended by Executive Order exemption______3115 No. 11226, relating to the ob­ Rules and Regulations Notices servance of holidays by govern­ Federal disaster assistance; grant Extension of temporary toler­ ment agencies______3111 in lieu of temporary housing or ances: other emergency shelter______3121 Fungicide dodine______3140 EXECUTIVE AGENCIES Notices Nickel sulfate and maneb_____ 3141 American Samoa; notice of major Petitions filed: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH disaster___... ______3144 International Minerals and SERVICE Chemical Corp______3141 FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. 3141 Proposed Rule Making CORPORATION Foreign quarantine notices; im­ portation of nursery stocks, Rules and Regulations HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND plants and seeds______3124 Counties designated: WELFARE DEPARTMENT Barley crop insurance______3113 See Food and Drug Administra­ AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Wheat crop insurance______3113 tion. See Agricultural Research Serv­ ice; Consigner and Marketing FEDERAL HOME LOAN Service; Federal Crop Insurance BANK BOARD INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Corporation. Notices See aJso Fish and Wildlife Service ; Land Management Bureau. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Federal savings and loan associa­ tions ; change in office locations. 3142 Notices Notices Statement of changes in financial Armed Forces Radiobiology Re­ FEDERAL MARITIME interests: search Institute; issuance of fa­ Carpenter, Hubbell______3137 cility amendment______3142 COMMISSION Eppard, Clyde M______3137 General Dynamics Corp.; issuance Notices Hall, Glenn J ______3137 of facility license______3141 Farrell Lines Inc., and Delta Lengnick, Lewis W______3137 Steamship Lines Inc.; agree­ McMealey, John Lawrence___ 3137 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD ment filed for approval__ .____ 3142 McNeer, Charles S______3137 Notices Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.; Negroni, Julio A______3137 order to show cause______3143 Neubauer, John P______¿Í_____ 3137 D e t r o i t-Toronto, Erie-Toronto Ramirez, Rafael R______3138 Route case; postponement of FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Schultz, LeRoy J ______3138 prehearing conference______3141 Watson, Charles W______3138 Notices Williams, Carl H______3138 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Hearings, etc.: Rules and Regulations Algonquin Gas Transmission Health, Education, and Welfare Co., and Tennessee Gas INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE Department; excepted service_3113 Transmission Co______3143 BUREAU Natural Gas Pipeline Company Notices COAST GUARD of America______3143 Petuch, Boleslaw and Hydraulics Proposed Rule Making FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE A.G.; order denying export priv­ Navigation and vessel inspection_3122 ileges ------3138 Rules and Regulations Rad. Reps.; Factors Ltd., et al; COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Sport fishing: order temporarily denying ex­ See International Commerce Bu­ Choctaw National Wildlife Ref­ port privileges______3140 reau. uge, Alabama______3117 Washita National Wildlife Ref­ CONSUMER AND MARKETING uge, Oklahoma______3118 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG Notices Rules and Regulations ADMINISTRATION Celery grown in Florida; expenses Motor carrier: and rate of assessment___ __3115 Rules and Regulations Broker, water carrier and Canned artichokes; confirmation freight forwarder applica­ Proposed Rule Making of effective date______3116 tions___ i_____:______3146 Milk in certain marketing areas: Food additives: Temporary authority applica­ Greater Cincinnati and Dayton- Carrageenan with polysorbate tions______3165 Springfleld, Ohio; decision__ 3126 8 0 ----- 3116 Transfer proceedings. ____ _ 3166 Tampa Bay; notice of hearing_3125 Nickel sulfate______3116 (Continued on next page) 3109 3110 CONTENTS

LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Notices COMMISSION Alaska; filing of plat of survey___ 3136 Notices Idaho: Hearings, etc.: Filing of protraction diagram.- 3136 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Special rules for grazing dis­ Railway Co______3144 tricts______3137 Continental Vending Machine Nevada; filing of plat of survey Corp______3144 and order providing for opening International Utilities Overseas of lands______3136 Capital Corp______3145 Pinal County Development As­ POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT sociation______— 3146 Rules and Regulations Miscellaneous amendments to TREASURY DEPARTMENT chapter (2 documents)___ 3119, 3120 See Coast Guard.

List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since lanuary 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected.

3 CFR 21 CFR 39 CFR EXECUTIVE ORDER 1______3115 33______3119 11272______3111 51______3116 3 4 ...______3119 121 (2 documents)__ 1__ 3116 48______3119 191 (2 documents)____ .____ 3116, 3117 51 ______3120 5 CFR 52 (2 documents)______3119, 3120 32 CFR 53 ...... __...... —— ______— 3120 213______—— 3113 58______— ______3120 1710______I.— 3121 61______3120 132 _ 3120 7 CFR 33 CFR 133 ______—______3121 401 (2 documents)______3113 P roposed R ules : 967______3115 80______3122 46 CFR 90_:______3122 P roposed R u l e s: P roposed R ules : 319______3124 95______3122 10.____ 3122 1012______3125 1033 ______3126 50 CFR 1034 _ 3126 33 (2 documents)______3117, 3118 Presidential Documents

Title 3— THE PRESIDENT Executive Order 11272 TO EXCEPT EMPLOYEES OF THE POSTAL FIELD SERVICE FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10358, AS AMENDED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11226, RELATING TO THE OBSERVANCE OF HOLIDAYS BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES By virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows: S ection 1. Executive Order No. 103581 of June 9,1952, as amended by Executive Order No. 11226 2 of May 27,1965, entitled “Observance of Holidays by Government Agencies,” is hereby further amended (1) by changing section 1 to read as follows: “S ection 1. Except as provided in section 10, this Order shall apply to all executive departments, independent agencies, and Government- owned or Government-controlled corporations, including their field services.” (2) by adding a new section 10 as follows: “Sec. 10. The provisions of sections 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 of this Order shall not apply to the postal field service, and the Postmaster General shall provide by regulation for equivalent benefits for all employees of the postal field service.” S ec. 2. The amendments to Executive Order No. 10358, as amended, ordered by section 1 of this Order shall be effective upon issuance of this Order. L yndon B. J ohnson T h e W h ite H ouse, February 23,1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-2088; Filed, Feb. 24,1966; 11: 28 a.m.]

13 CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 875; 17 F.R. 5269. a 30 F.R. 7213.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3113 Rules and Regulations

Idaho South D akota Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE Bannock. Jerome. Beadle. Grant. Benewah. Kootenai. Brookings. Hamlin. PERSONNEL Bingham. Latah. Brown. Kingsbury. Bonneville. Lewis. Clark. McPherson. Chapter I-—Civil Service Commission Camas. Lincoln. Codington, MarshaU. Canyon. Madison. Day. Miner. PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE Caribou. Minidoka. Deuel. Roberts. Cassia. Nez Perce. Edmunds. Spink. Department of Health, Education, and Franklin. Oneida. Faulk. Welfare Fremont. Owyhee. Utah Gooding. Power. Section 213.3316 is amended to show Idaho. Teton. Cache. Utah. that two positions of Confidential Sec­ Jefferson. Twin Falls. Salt Lake. retary to the Assistant Secretary for In­ Washington dividual and Family Services are ex­ Maryland Adams. Grant. cepted under Schedule C. Effective on Kent. Queen Annes. Asotin. Klickitat. publication in the F ederal R egister, Benton. Lincoln. paragraph (n) and subparagraph (1) M innesota Columbia. Spokane. thereunder are added to § 213.3316 as Becker. Pennington. Douglas. Walla Walla. set out below. Chippewa. Polk. Franklin. Whitman. Clay. Pope. Garfield. Yakima. § 213.3316 Department of Health, Edu­ Grant. Bed Lake. Wisconsin cation, and W elfare. Kandiyohi. Roseau. * * .* * * Kittson. Stearns. Dodge. Fond du Lac. Mahnomen. Stevens. Wyoming (n) Office of the Assistant Secretary Marshall. Swift. ' Goshen. for Individual and Family Services. (1) Norman. Traverse. Two Confidential Secretaries to the As­ Otter Tail. Wilkin. (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) sistant Secretary for Individual and Montana Family Services. [ seal] J oh n N . Lu ft , Big Horn. Liberty. (R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; Blaine. Pondera. Manager, 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 3 Cascade. Richland. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) Chouteau. Roosevelt. [F.R. Doc. 66-1990; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Daniels. Sheridan. 8:47 a.m.] U nited S tates Civil S erv­ Fallon. Stillwater. ice Co m m issio n, Fergus. Teton. [ seal] M ary V. W enzel, Glacier. Toole. Executive Assistant to Hill. Valley. PART 401— FEDERAL CROP the Commissioners. Judith Basin. Yellowstone. INSURANCE [FJt. Doc. 66-1964; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; North D akota Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 8:45 a.m.] Barnes. McLean. Benson. Mercer. and Succeeding Crop Years Bottineau. Mountrail. A ppendix—Co u n ties D esignated for Burke. Nelson. W heat Crop I nsurance Title 7— AGRICULTURE Burleigh. Oliver. Cass. Pembina. Pursuant to authority contained- in Chapter IV— Federal Crop Insurance Cavalier. Ramsey. §401.1 of the above-identified regula­ Corporation, Department of Agri­ Dickey. Ransom. tions, the following counties have been Divide. culture Renville. designated for wheat crop insurance for Dunn. Richland. the 1967 crop year. PART 401— FEDERAL CROP Eddy. Rolette. Emmons. Sargent. California INSURANCE Foster. Sheridan. Golden Valley. Stark. Kern. San Luis Obispo. Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 Grand Forks. Steele. Modoc. Tulare. and Succeeding Crop Years Grant. Stutsman. Colorado Griggs. Towner. A ppendix—Counties D esignated for Hettinger. ' Traill. Adams. Logan. Arapahoe. B arley Crop I nsurance Kidder. Walsh. Morgan. La Moure. Ward. Boulder. Phillips. Pursuant to authority contained in Logan. Wells. Cheyenne. Sedgwick. § 401.1 of the above-identified regula­ McKenzie. Williams. Elbert. Washington. tions, the following counties have been McHenry. Kit Carson. Weld. Oregon Larimer. Yuma. designated for barley crop insurance for Lincoln. the 1967 crop year. Gilliam. Sherman. Idaho Jefferson. Umatilla. California Klamath. Union. Bannock. Gooding. Kern. San Luis Obispo. Linn. Wallowa. Benewah. Idaho. Modoc. Tulare. Malheur. Wasco. Bingham. Jefferson. Morrow. Bonneville. Jerome. Colorado P ennsylvania Camas. Kootenai. Canyon. Latah. Boulder. Sedgwick. Adams. Franklin. Caribou. Lewis. Larimer. Washington. Chester. Lebanon. Cassia. Lincoln. Logan. Weld. Cumberland. York. Franklin. Madison. Morgan. Dauphin. Fremont. Minidoka.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3114 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Montana—Continued Idaho—Continued K ansas—Con tin u ed Power. Ness. Sedgwick. Judith Basin. Roosevelt. Nez Perce. Sheridan. Oneida. Teton. Norton. Seward. Liberty. Owyhee. Twin Falls. Osage. Shawnee, McCone. Stillwater. Osborne. Sheridan. Musselshell. Teton. I llinois Ottawa. Sherman. Petroleum. Toole. McDonough. Pawnee. Smith. Phillips. Valley. Adams. Wibaux. Bond. McLean. Phillips. Stafford. Pondera. Cass. . Macon. Pottawatomie. Stanton. Richland. Yellowstone. Champaign. Macoupin. Pratt. Stevens. N ebraska Christian. Madison. Rawlins. Sumner. Clark. Mason. Reno. Thomas. Adams. Kearney. Clinton. Menard. Republic. Trego. Banner. Keith. Coles. Monroe. Rice, i Wabaunsee. Box Butte. Kimball. Crawford. Montgomery. Riley. Wallace. Butler. Lancaster. Cumberland. Morgan. Rooks. Washington. Cass. Morrill. De Witt. Moultrie. Rush. Wichita. Chase. Nemaha. Douglas. Piatt. Russell. Wilson. Cheyenne. Nuckolls. Edgar. Pike. Saline. Woodson, Clay. Otoe. Effingham. St. Clair. Scott. Dawes. Pawnee. Payette. Sangamon. K entucky Deuel. Perkins. Fulton. Schuyler. Christian. Dodge. Phelps. Greene. , Scott. Maryland Fillmore. Polk. Franklin. Red Willow. Hancock. Shelby. Kent. Queen Annes. Iroquois. Tazewell. Frontier. Richardson. Jasper. Vermilion. Michigan Furnas. Saline. Jefferson. Washington. Gage. Saunders. Bay. Kalamazoo. Garden. Scotts Bluff. Jersey. Wayne. Branch. Lenawee. — Logan. Gosper. Seward. Calhoun. Monroe, Hamilton. Sheridan. I ndiana Clinton. Saginaw. Harlan. Thayer. Eaton. St. Clair. Adams. Kosciusko. Hayes. Washington. Gratiot. St. Joseph. Hitchcock. Webster. Allen. Madison. Hillsdale. Sanilac. Benton. Marshall. Jefferson. York. Huron. Shiawassee. Johnson. Blackford. Miami. Ingham. Tuscola. Boone. Montgomery. Ionia. Washtenaw. N ew Mexico Oarrolì. Morgan. Jackson. Curry. Cass. Noble. M innesota North Dakota Clay. Pulaski. Clinton. Putnam. Becker. Norman. Adams. McLean. Decatur. Randolph. Big Stone. Otter Tail. Barnes. Mercer. De Kalb. Ripley. Blue Earth. Pennington. Benson. Morton. Delaware. Rush. Chippewa. Polk. Bottineau. Mountrail. *. Fountain. Shelby. Clay. Red Lake. Bowman. Nelson. Fulton. Sullivan. Dakota. Redwood. Burke. Oliver. Grant. Tippecanoe. Faribault. Renville. Burleigh. Pembina. Hancock. Tipton. Freeborn. Roseau. Cass. Pierce. Henry. Vigo. Grant. Stevens. Cavalier. Ramsey. Howard. Wabash. Kandiyohi. Swift. Dickey. Ransom. Huntington. Warren. Kittson. Traverse. Divide. Renville. Jackson. Wayne. Lac Qui Parle. Waseca. Dunn. Richland. Jasper. Wells. Le Sueur. Wilkin. Eddy. Rolette. Jay. White. Mahnoman. Yellow Medicine Emmons. Sargent. Johnson. Whitley. Marshall. Foster. Sheridan. Missouri Golden Valley. Sioux. K ansas Grand Forks. Slope. Adair. Johnson. Grant. Stark. Allen. Grant. Knox. Anderson. Gray. Andrew. Griggs. Steele. Atchison. Audrain. Lafayette. Hettinger. Stutsman. Greeley. Lawrence. Barber. Greenwood. Barton. Kidder. Towner. Barton. Hamilton. Bates. Lewis. La Moure. Traill. Bourbon. Harper. Buchanan. Lincoln. Logan. Walsh. Brown. Caldwell. Linn. McHenry. Ward. Harvey. Livingston. Wells. Butler. Haskell. Callaway. McIntosh. Hodgeman. Carroll. Macon. McKenzie. Williams. Chase. Marion. Chautauqua. Jackson. Cass. Chariton. Monroe. Ohio Cherokee. Jefferson. Montgomery. Cheyenne. Jewell. Clark. Allen. Logan. Johnson. Cooper. Nodaway. Ashland. Lucas. Clark. Pettis. Clay. Kearny. Daviess. Auglaize. Madison. Kingman. De Kalb. Pike. Champaign. Marion. Cloud. Ralls. Coffey. Kiowa. Franklin. Clark. Medina. Gentry. Ray. Clinton. Mercer. Cowley. Labette. St. Charles. Crawford. Lane. Grundy. Crawford. Miami. Saline. Decatur. Lincoln. Harrison. Darke. Montgomery Linn. Henry. Scotland. Defiance. Morrow. Dickinson. Shelby. Doniphan. Logan. Holt. Delaware. Paulding. Lyon. Howard. Sullivan. Erie. Pickaway. Douglas. Vernon. Edwards. McPherson. Jackson. Fayette. Preble. Elk. N Marion., Jasper. Fulton. Putnam. Richland. Ellis. Marshall. Montana Greene. Ellsworth. Meade. Hancock. Sandusky. . Finney. Miami; Blaine. Dawson. Hardin. Seneca. Ford. Mitchell. Big Horn. Fallon. Henry. Shelby. Franklin. Montgomery. Carbon. Fergus. Highland. Stark. Geary. Morris. Cascade. Glacier. Huron. Tuscarawas. Gove. Nemaha. Chouteau. Golden-Valley. Knox. Union. Graham. Neosho. Daniels. Hill. Licking. Van Wert.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 3115 Ohio—Continued (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, apply to all assessable celery beginning Wayne. Wood. as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) with such date. Williams. Wyandot. [seal] J o h n N . Ltjft, (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 US.C. Oklahoma Manager, 601-674) Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. Alfalfa. Kay. Dated: February 21,1966. Beckham. Kingfisher. [F.R. Doc. 66-1903; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Blaine. Kiowa. 8:47 a.m.] P aul A. N icholson, Caddo. Logan. Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ Canadian. Major. etable Division, Consumer Comanche, Mayes. and Marketing Service. Cotton, Noble. Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ Craig. Nowata. ing Service (Marketing Agreements [F.R. Doc. 66-2015; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Custer. Osage.' and O rd ers; Fruits, Vegetables, 8:49 a.m.] Delaware. Ottawa. Dewey. Pawnee. Nuts), Department of Agriculture Ellis. Payne. Garfield. Texas. PART 967— CELERY GROWN IN Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS Grady. Tillman. FLORIDA Grant. Washington. Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis­ Greer. Washita. Expenses and Rate of Assessment tration, Department of Health, Edu­ Harmon. Woods. cation, and Welfare Harper. Woodward. Notice of rule making regarding pro­ Jackson. posed expenses and a proposed rate of SUBCHAPTiR A— GENERAL assessment, to be effective under Mar­ Oregon keting Agreement No. 149 and Order No. pa rt 1— REGULATIONS FOR THE EN­ Baker. Morrow. -967 (7 CFR Part 967; 30 F.R. 14266), reg­ FORCEMENT OF THE FEDERAL Gilliam. Sherman. ulating the handling of celery grown in Jefferson. FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT Umatilla. Florida was published in the F ederal Klamath. Union. R egister Propylene Glycol and Glycerin as Car­ Linn. Wallowa. February 3,1966 (31 F.R. 1304). Malheur. Wasco. This regulatory program is effective un­ riers for Food-Grade Stabilizers and der the Agricultural Marketing Agree­ Emulsifiers; Exemption From Decla­ P ennsylvania ment Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. ration of Presence in Quiescently Adams. Franklin. 601 et seq.). The notice afforded inter­ Chester. Lancaster. ested persons an _ opportunity to sub­ Frozen Confections Cumberland. Lebanon. mit written data, views, or arguments There was published in the F e d e r a l Dauphin. York. pertaining thereto not later than 10 days R e g i s t e r of December 18, 1965 (30 F.R. South Dakota following publication in the F ederal R eg­ 15666), a proposal of American Food Aurora. Hughes. ister. None was filed. Laboratories, Inc., 1000 Stanley Avenue, Beadle. Hutchinson. After consideration of all relevant Brooklyn, N.Y., 11208, that § 1.10 be Bennett. Hyde. matters presented, including the pro­ amended to exempt propylene glycol and Bon Homme Jones. posals set forth in the aforesaid notice glycerin from the requirements of sec­ Brown. Kingsbury. which were recommended by the Florida tion 403 (i) (2) of the Federal Food, Drug, Campbell. Lyman. Celery Committee, established pursuant and Cosmetic Act, when used as a car­ Clark. McPherson. Codington. Marshall. to said marketing agreement and order, rier for food-grade stabilizers in quies­ Corson. Mellette. it is hereby found and determined that: cently frozen confections. Comments on the proposal were invited. Day. Miner. § 967.201 Expenses and rate of assess­ Deuel. Perkins. ment. One comment received favored adop­ Dewey. Potter. tion of the proposal, and another, from Douglas. Roberts. (a) The expenses that are reasonable the sponsor of the proposal, American Edmunds. Spink. and likely to be incurred during the Food Laboratories, Inc., stated that the Faulk. Stanley. Grant. Sully. initial fiscal year November 15, 1965, proposal as submitted inadvertently Haakon. Tripp. through July 31, 1966, by the Florida omitted reference to “emulsifiers,” al­ Hamlin. Walworth. Celery Committee for its maintenance though the rationale advanced in the pe­ Hand. and functioning and for such purposes tition included references to the use of T ennessee as the Secretary may determine to be propylene glycol and glycerin as carriers Obion. Robertson. appropriate, will amount to $19,405.81. for both emulsifiers and stabilizers. (b) The rate of assessment to be paid The Commissioner of Food and Drugs T exas by each handler in accordance with the has considered the comments received, Baylor. Gray. marketing agreement and this part shall and other relevant information, and con­ Castro. Grayson. be one-fourth of 1 cent ($0.0025) per cluded that the amendment proposed CoUin. Hale. crate of celery handled by him as the should be adopted incorporating the ref­ Cooke. Jones. Denton. Knox. first handler thereof during said fiscal erence to “emulsifiers.” Therefore, pur­ Floyd. Lipscomb. year. suant to the provisions of the Federal Foard.' Wilbarger. (c) Terms used in this section have the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (secs. 403 same meaning as when used in the mar­ (i), 701(a), 52 Stat. 1048, 1055; 21 U.S.C. U tah keting agreement and this part. 343 (i), 371(a)), and in accordance with Box Elder. Salt Lake. the authority delegated to the Commis­ Cache. Utah. It is hereby found that good cause ex­ ists for not postponing the effective time sioner by the Secretary of Health, Edu­ Washington cation, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.90): It is of this section until 30 days after publica­ ordered, That § 1.10 be amended by add­ Adams. Grant. tion in the F e d e r a l R e gi ster (5 U.S.C. Asotin. iT Klickitat. 1003) in that: (1) The relevant provi­ ing a new paragraph (g), as follows: Benton. Lincoln. sions of said marketing agreement and § 1.10 Food; labeling; designation of in­ Columbia. Spokane. gredients. Douglas. Walla Walla. this part require that rates of assess­ Franklin. Whitman. ment fixed for a particular fiscal year ***** Garfield. Yakima. shall be applicable to all assessable celery (g) Propylene glycol or glycerin pres­ Wyoming from the beginning of such fiscal year, ent in quiescently frozen confections be­ and (2) the initial fiscal year began on cause of use as a carrier for food-grade Goshen. Platte. November 15, 1965, and the rate of as­ Laramie. emulsifiers and stabilizers is exempt sessment herein fixed will automatically from the requirements of section 403 (i)

No. 38---- 2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3116 RULES AND REGULATIONS (2) of the act (requiring a declaration date of the experimental permit issued exist unless the standards provide for the on the label of the common or usual by the U.S. Department of Agriculture use of carrageenan, or salts of carragee­ name of each ingredient when the food to read “February 15, 1967.” nan, combined with polysorbate 80. is fabricated from two or more ingredi­ 2. Section 121.1122 Nickel sulfate is (e) The carrageenan and salts of car­ ents) . amended by changing the expiration rageenan produced in accordance with date of the experimental permit issued this section, and foods containing the Effective date. This order shall be­ by the U.S. Department of Agriculture same, in addition to the other require­ come effective on the date of its publi­ to read “February 15, 1967.” ments of the act, are labeled to show the cation in the F ederal R egister. Notice and public procedure and de­ presence of polysorbate 80, and the label (Secs. 403(1). 701(a), 52 Stat. 1048, 1055; 21 layed effective date are not necessary or labeling of the carrageenan and salts U.S.C. 343(1), 371(a) ) prerequisites to the promulgation of this of carrageenan so produced bear ade­ Dated: February 17, 1966. order since the amendments are in the quate directions for use. nature of editorial changes. Any person who will be adversely af­ J. K . K irk, (Secs. 409.701(a), 52 Stat. 1055, 72 Stat. 1785; fected by the foregoing order may at any Assistant Commissioner, 21 U.S.C. 348.371(a)) time within 30 days from the date of its for Operations. publication in the F ederal R egister file [F.R. Doc. 66-1998; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Dated: February 17, 1966. with the Hearing Clerk, Department of 8:48 a.m.] J. K. K i r k , Health, Education, and Welfare, Room Assistant Commissioner 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., for Operations. Washington, D.C., 20201, written objec­ SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS tions thereto, preferably in quintupli- [F.R. Doc. 66-2000; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; PART 51— CANNED VEGETABLES cate. Objections sjxall show wherein the 8:48 a.m.] person filing will he adversely affected Canned Artichokes; Confirmation of by the order and specify with particu­ Effective Date of Order Amending PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVES larity the provisions of the order deemed Standard of Identity objectionable and the grounds for the Subpart D-—Food Additives Permitted objections. If a hearing is requested, the In the matter of amending the defini­ in Food for Human Consumption objections must state the issues for the tion and standard of identity for canned hearing. A hearing will be granted if vegetables other than those specifically Carrageenan W it h P olysorbate 80 the objections are supported by grounds regulated (§ 51.990) to provide for the legally sufficient to justify the relief use of ascorbic- acid as an optional in­ The Commissioner of Food and Drugs, sought. Objections may be accompanied gredient in canned artichokes packed in having evaluated the data in a petition (FAP 5A1695) filed by Drew Chemical by a memorandum or brief in support glass; thereof. Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ Corp., 416 Division Street, Boonton, N.J., eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (secs. 07005, and other relevant material, has Effective date. This order shall be­ 401, 701, 52 Stat. 1046, 1055 as amended; concluded that a regulation should be come effective on the date of its publica­ 70 Stat. 919; 72 Stat. 948; 21 U.S.C. 341, issued to prescribe the safe use of the tion in the F ederal R egister. 371), and in accordance with the au­ food additive polysorbate 80 in the pro­ (Sec. 4 09(c)(1), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. thority delegated to the Commissioner duction of the food additive carrageenan. 348(c)(1)) Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of of Food and Drugs by the Secretary of Dated: February 17, 1966. Health, Education, and Welfare (21 CFR the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 2.90), notice is given that no objections Act (sec. 409(c)(1), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 J. K. K i r k , were filed to the order in the above- U.S.C. 348(c) (1) ), and under the author­ Assistant Commissioner identified matter published in the F ed­ ity delegated to the Commissioner by the for Operations. Secretary of Health, Education, and Wel­ eral R egister of January 4, 1966 (31 [F.R. Doc. 66-2001; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; F.R. 9). Accordingly, the amendments fare (21 CFR 2.90), Part 121 is amended 8:48 axa.] promulgated by that order will become by adding to Subpart D a new section, as effective March 5, 1966. follows: SUBCHAPTER D— HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (Secs. 401, 701, 52 Stat. 1046, 1055 as amend­ § 121.1193 Carrageenan with polysor­ ed; 70 Stat. 919; 72 Stat. 948; 21 U.S.C. 341, bate 80. PART 191— HAZARDOUS SUB­ 371) Carrageenan otherwise meeting the STANCES; DEFINITIONS AND PRO­ Dated: February 17, 1966. * definition and specifications of § 121.1066 CEDURAL AND INTERPRETATIVE (a) and (b) and salts of carrageenan J. K. K i r k , REGULATIONS Assistant Commissioner otherwise meeting the definition of for Operations. § 121.1067(a) may be safely produced Cigarette Lighters Containing Butane with the use of polysorbate 80 meeting Fuel and/or Isobutane; Exemption [F.R. Doc. 66-1999; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; the specifications and requirements of From Labeling Requirements 8:48 a.m.] § 121.1009 (a) and (b) in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: There has been submitted to the Com­ (a) The polysorbate 80 is used only to missioner of Food and Drugs, pursuant to PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVES facilitate separation of sheeted car­ section 3(c) of the Federal Hazardous Subpart C— Food Additives Permitted rageenan and salts of carrageenan from Substances Labeling Act and § 191.62 of drying rolls. the regulations thereunder, a request to in Feed and Drinking Water of An­ (b) The carrageenan and salts of car­ exempt from the labeling requirements imals or for the Treatment of Food- rageenan contain not more than 5 per­ of section 2.(p) (1) of the act certain Producing Animals cent by weight of polysorbate 80, and the cigarette lighters that contain butane final food containing the additives con­ and/or isobutane fuel at the time of sale. Subpart D— Food Additives Permitted tains polysorbate 80 in an amount not to Because of common knowledge of their in Food for Human Consumption exceed 500 parts per million. intended use to produce flame, and be­ (c) The carrageenan and salts of car­ cause the construction of the lighters is N ickel S ulfate rageenan so produced are used only in such that they present no other sub­ Effective on the date of signature of producing foods in gel form and only for stantial hazard under reasonably fore­ this order, the food additive regulations the purposes defined in § 121.1066(c) and seeable conditions of use, the Commis­ (21 CFR Part 121) are amended as fol­ § 121.1067(b), respectively. sioner concludes that full compliance lows: (d) The carrageenan and salts of car­ with the labeling requirements of sec­ 1. Section 121.242 Nickel sulfate is rageenan so produced are not used in tion 2(p) (1) of the act is not neces­ amended by changing the expiration foods for which standards of identity sary for the adequate protection of the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 3117 public health and safety. Therefore, The Commissioner has concluded that mitted on all refuge waters except those pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ because of the small quantity of ethylene closed by signs. The open area is shown eral Hazardous Substances Labeling Act glycol present in the pads and because on a map that is available at the refuge (sec. 3(c), 74 Stat. 375; 15 U.S.C. 1262) the package contains no free liquid, a headquarters and from the office of the and under the authority vested in the minor hazard is presented and compli­ Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish­ Secretary of Health, Education, and Wel­ ance with § 191.7(b) (4) of the regula­ eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- fare and delegated to the Commissioner tions is not necessary for the adequate Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. (21 CFR 2.90), § 191.63(a) is amended protection of the public health and Sport fishing shall be in accordance with by adding a new subparagraph (29), as safety. Accordingly, pursuant to the all applicable State regulations subject follows: provisions of the Federal Hazardous Sub­ to the following special conditions: § 191.63 Exemptions for small pack­ stances Labeling Act (sec. 3 (c), 74 Stat. (1) The sport fishing season on the ref­ ages, minor hazards, and special cir­ 374; 15 U.S.C. 1262) and under the au­ uge extends from February 15, 1966, cumstances. thority vested in the Secretary of Health, through November 30, 1966, on all ref­ Education, and Welfare and delegated to uge waters not closed by signs. * * * * * the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.90), § 191.63 (2) Fishing permitted during daylight (a) * * * (a) is amended by adding thereto a new hours only. (29) Cigarette lighters containing bu­ subparagraph (28), as follows: tane and/or isobutane fuel are exempt The provisions of this special regulation from the labeling requirements of section § 191.63 Exemptions for small pack­ supplement the regulations which govern 2(p) (1) of the act, insofar as such re­ ages, minor hazards, and special cir­ fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally quirements would otherwise be necessary cumstances. which are set forth in Title 59, Code because the fuel therein is extremely ***** of Federal Regulations, Part 33. flammable and under pressure; provided (a) *- * * A rkansas that: (28) Packages containing felt pads im­ (i) The lighters contain not more than pregnated with ethylene glycol are ex­ BIG LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 12 grams of fuel at the time of sale. empt from the labeling requirements of Sport fishing on the Big Lake National (ii) The fuel reservoir is designed to § 191.7(b)(4) provided that: Wildlife Refuge, Manila, Ark., is per­ withstand a pressure of at least 1%. times (i) The total amount of ethylene gly­ mitted only on the areas designated by the maximum pressure which will be de­ col in each pad does not exceed 1 gram; signs as open to fishing. These open veloped in the container at 120° F. and areas, comprising 4,000 acres, are de­ (ii) The liquid is held by the felt pad Notice and public procedure and de­ so that there is no free ethylene glycol lineated on a map available at the refuge; layed effective date are not necessary within the package. headquarters and from the office of the prerequisites to the promulgation of this Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish­ order, and I so find, since the Federal Notice and public procedure and de­ eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Sev­ Hazardous Substances Labeling Act con­ layed effective date are not necessary pre­ enth Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport templates such modification of the label­ requisites to the promulgation of this fishing shall be in accordance with all ing requirements under certain condi­ order, and I so find, since the Federal tions. - Hazardous Substances Labeling Act con­ applicable State regulations subject to templates such modification of the label­ the following special conditions: Effective date. This order shall be­ ing requirements under certain condi­ (1) The sport fishing season on the ref­ come effective on the date of its publica­ tions. uge extends from March 1,1966, through tion in the F ederal R egister. October 31, 1966. (Sec. 3 (c), 74 Stat. 375; 15 U.S.C. 1262) Effective date. This order shall be­ (2) Fishing permitted during daylight come effective on the date of its publica­ hours only. Dated: February 17, 1966. tion in the F ederal R egister. The provisions of this special regulation J. K . K ir k , (Sec. 3 (c ), 74 Stat; 374; 15 TJ.S.C. 1262) supplement the regulations which govern Assistant Commissioner Dated: February 17,1966. fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally for Operations. which are set forth in Title 50, Code of J. K . K irk, [F.R. Doc. 66-2002; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Federal Regulations, Part 33. 8:48 ajn.] Assistant Commissioner for Operations. F lorida [F.R. Doc. 66-2003; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; ST. MARKS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE PART 191— HAZARDOUS SUB­ 8:48 a.m.] Sport fishing on the St. Marks National STANCES; DEFINITIONS AND PRO­ Wildlife Refuge, St. Marks, Fla., is per­ CEDURAL AND INTERPRETATIVE mitted only on the areas designated by REGULATIONS Title 50— WILDLIFE AND signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 44,000 acres, ore de­ Felt Pads Impregnated With Ethylene lineated on a map available at the refuge Glycol; Exemption From Labeling FISHERIES headquarters and from the office of the Requirements Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries Regional Director, Bureau of Sport and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- There has been submitted to the Com­ Service, Department of the Interior Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. missioner of Food and Drugs, pursuant to Sport fishing shall be in accordance with section 3(c) of the Federal Hazardous PART 33— SPORT FISHING all applicable State regulations subject Substances Labeling Act and § 191.62 of to the following special conditions: the regulations thereunder, a request to Wildlife Refuges in Alabama and (1) The sport fishing season on the exempt packages of certain small felt Certain Other States refuge extends from April 1, 1966, pads impregnated with ethylene glycol The following special regulations are through October 15, 1966, on the St. from the special labeling required be­ Marks and Wakulla Units, and from cause of their ethylene glycol content. issued and are effective on date of pub­ lication in the F ederal R egister. March 1, 1966, through October 15, 1966, Although these articles contain more on certain designated areas of the Pan­ than 10 percent of ethylene glycol by § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ acea Unit north of Highway No. 372. weight and, therefore, under § 191.7 (a) ing; for individual wildlife refuge The area south of Highway No. 372 on (3), (b)(4) of the hazardous substances areas. the Panacea Unit will remain open regulations would require special label­ A labama through December 31, 1966. ing, the petitioner represents that spe­ CHOCTAW NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE (2) Fishing permitted one-half hour cial labeling is not necessary because of before sunrise until one-half hour after the small quantity of the chemical actu­ Sport fishing on the Choctaw National sunset 7 days a week. ally present in the pads. Wildlife Refuge, Jackson, Ala., is per­ (3) Boats with motors prohibited. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3118 RULES AND REGULATIONS (4) Trotlines as permitted by State (1) The sport fishing season on the through September 30, 1966. Sunrise to regulations are allowed except that lines refuge extends from March 1 through sunset. shall be taken up prior to closing hour October 31, 1966, on Ross Branch Reser­ (2) Boats with outboard motors and of fishing daily. voir, Bluff and Loakfoma Lakes, Keaton inboard motors of not more than 6 horse­ (5) Pole and line; rod and reel; arti­ Tower Pond, Parker and Pete Sloughs, power may be used. ficial baits permitted. Cypress, Jones, and Oktoc Creeks, and The provisions of this special regulation Noxubee River. supplement the regulations which govern The provisions of this special regulation (2) Road borrow pits and Betts Pond, supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally no closed season. which are set forth in Title 50, Code of fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally (3) A daily permit (50 cents) is re­ which are set forth in Title 50, Code of quired by the Mississippi State Game and Federal Regulations, Part 33. Federal Regulations, Part 33. Fish Commission to fish in Bluff and R eelfoot N ational W ildlife R efuge Louisiana Loakfoma Lakes, and tailwaters of the Sport fishing on the Reelfoot National spillways. Wildlife Refuge, Tenn., is permitted only SABINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE (4) No permit is required to fish in the on the area designated by signs as open Sport fishing on the Sabine National balance of the refuge that is open and a to fishing. These open areas, compris­ Wildlife Refuge, Sulphur, La., is per­ Federal permit is not required to enter ing 9,092 acres, are delineated on a map mitted only on the areas designated by the public fishing area. available at the refuge headquarters and signs as open to fishing. These open (5) Fishing permitted during day­ from the office of the Regional Director, areas, comprising 40,000 acres, are de­ light hours only. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, lineated on a map available at the refuge (6) Boats and motors permitted. 809 Peachtree-Seventh Building, At­ headquarters and from the office of the (7) Snag lines prohibited. lanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be Regional Director, Bureau of Sport The provisions of this special regulation in accordance with all applicable State Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- supplement the regulations which gov­ regulations subject to the following spe­ Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. ern fishing on wildlife refuge areas gen­ cial conditions: Sport fishing shall be in accordance with erally which are set forth in Title 50, (1) The sport fishing season on the all applicable State regulations subject Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33. refuge extends from February 23, 1966, to the following special conditions: through October 23, 1966. (1) The sport fishing season on the N orth Carolina (2) Boats with outboard motors and refuge extends from March 15, 1966, MACKAY ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE inboard motors of not more than 10 through October 15, 1966. horsepower may be used. (2) Fishermen must not enter refuge Sport fishing on the Mackay Island The provisions of this special regulation waters earlier than 45 minutes before National Wildlife Refuge, Knotts Island, supplement the regulations which govern sunrise and shall leave refuge waters by N.C., is permitted only on the areas fishing on wildlife refuge areas gener­ 45 minutes after sunset. designated by signs as open to fishing. ally which are set forth in Title 50, Code (3) Boats may be moored only at des­ These open areas, comprising 720 acres, of Federal Regulations, Part 33. ignated areas in Pool lb or Pool 3. Boats are delineated on a map available at the left at these mooring sites must bear refuge headquarters and from the office L ester E. S cherer, owner’s name and address. Boats found of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Acting Regional Director, Bu­ moored outside designated areas or with­ Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- reau of Sport Fisheries and out required identification will be re­ Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Wildlife. moved to refuge headquarters. All boats Sport fishing shall be in accordance with F ebruary .15,1966. must be removed from the refuge prior all applicable State regulations subject [F.R. Doc. 66-1970; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; to the close of the fishing season. to the following special conditions: 8:47 a.m.] (1) The sport fishing season on the (4) Boats may not be dragged across refuge extends from March 16, 1966, levees for access to pool areas. Travel PART 33— SPORT FISHING over the refuge is restricted to water­ through October 14, 1966. .Fishing is ways. Fishermen are not to walk canal permitted in Corey’s Ditch and in the Washita National Wildlife Refuge, canal adjacent to the Knotts Island Okla. banks or levees except in Pool lb. Boat Causeway, on a year-round basis, for access into Pool lb is restricted to bridge bank fishing only. The following special regulation is is­ sites on Road Canal. (2) Fishing permitted during daylight sued and is effective on date of publica­ (5) Boats with outboard motors no tion in the F ederal R egister. larger than 10 horsepower permitted in hours only. refuge lakes and impoundments. No size (3) No limitations on motors used on § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ restriction on boats and motors in the boats. ing; for individual wildlife refuge canals and bayous. The provisions of this special regulation areas. O klahoma The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally WASHITA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Sport fishing on the Washita National which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33. Wildlife Refuge, Okla., is permitted only Federal Regulations, Part 33. T ennessee on areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising M is s is s ip p i LAKE ISOM NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 3,367 acres, are delineated on maps avail­ NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Sport fishing on the Lake Isom Na­ able at refuge headquarters, Butler, tional Wildlife Refuge, Tenn., is per­ Okla., and from the Regional Director, Sport fishing on the Noxubee National mitted only on the areas designated by Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Wildlife Refuge, Brooksville, Miss., is signs as open to fishing. These open Post Office Box 1306, Albuquerque, N. permitted only on the areas designated areas, comprising 750 acres, are deline­ Mex., 87103. Sport fishing" shall be in by signs as open to fishing. These open ated on a map' available at the refuge accordance with all applicable State areas, comprising 1,892 acres, are headquarters and from the office of the regulations subject to the following spe­ delineated on a map available at the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish­ cial conditions: refuge headquarters and from the office eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- (1) The open season for sport fishing of the Regional Director, Bureau of Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. on the refuge extends from April 1 Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Peachtree- Sport fishing shall be in accordance with through October 15, 1966, inclusive. Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. all applicable State regulations subject (2) Seining is prohibited in all refuge Sport fishing shall be in accordance with to the following special conditions: waters. all applicable State regulations subject Cl) The sport fishing season on the (3) The use of boats and motors is to the following special conditions: refuge extends from March 16, 1966, permitted only south of State Highway

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 3119 33, provided, that boats may not exceed tions of imprints for use on fourth-class posits may be made by mail. When the speeds of 10 miles per hour. catalogs and third-class matter by non­ deposit becomes less than enough to pay The provisions of this, special regula­ profit organizations mailed at bulk rates for an entire mailing, an additional tion supplement the regulations which have been added. As so revised, § 34.4 amount must -be deposited before any govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas reads as follows: mailings are made. The postmaster will generally which are set forth in Title 50, § 34.4 Form of permit imprints. furnish a receipt for each payment on Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, Form 3544. Credit for postage is not and are effective through October 15, Permit imprints must be prepared in allowed. Postage on a mailing must be 1966. one of the forms illustrated. The addi­ paid by only one method; that is, postage B layne D. G raves, tion of extraneous matter is not per­ may not be paid partly in money and Refuge Manager, Washita Na­ mitted. tional Wildlife Refuge, Butler, partly by postage stamps, except as pro- Okla. FttSTCUSSMAIl F ebruary 16,1966. U.S. POSTACE [F.R. Doc. 66-1971; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; PAID 5{ 8:47 a.m.] PERMIT No. 1 Title 39— POSTAL SERVICE Chapter I— Post Office Department PART 33— METERED STAMPS PART 34— PERMIT IMPRINTS PART 48— UNDELIVERABLE MAIL PART 52— INSURANCE Bulk Catalog Rate U.S. POSTAGE U.S. POSTAGE 4 C PAID PAID Miscellaneous Amendments New York, N.Y. New York, N.Y. The regulations of the Post Office De­ Permit No. L Permit No. 1 partment are amended as follows: I. In Part 33 make the following changes: A. In § 33.5, the first sentence in para­ BULK RATE US. POSTAGE BULK RATE graph (a) is revised for clarification to U.S. POSTAGE read as follows: PAID 2%C PAID New York, N.Y § 33.5 Metered reply postage. PERMIT No. 1 Permit No. I (a) Meter stamps may be. used to pre­ pay reply postage on letters and post cards under the following condi­ tions: * * * Nonprofit Org. Nonprofit Org. US. POSTACE Nonprofit Organization Note: The corresponding Postal Manual i s / \ o i U.S. POSTAGE U.S. POSTAGE section is 143.5. PAID i \ /P i IV* C PAID 1/4 C PAID \ y / New York, N.Y PERMIT No. 1 B. In § 33.6, paragraph (a) is revised V' a ìl i ì Fv ' Permit No. 1 to include a cross-reference to new § 34.5(f) (2) of this chapter. No t e : The corresponding Postal Manual section is 144.4 vided in subparagraph (2) of this para­ § 33.6 Mailings. graph. Whenever the computation of B. In § 34.5, the material in present postage results in a fraction of a cent (a) Preparation. The mailer must paragraph (f) is redesignated new para­ in the total, the- next higher even cent face metered mail, except packages or graph (f) (1) and is revised to add in­ must be paid. irregular overweight mail, and secure it structions prescribing that whenever (2) Fractional postage on meter mail­ well in bundles. This prevents its be­ computation of postage results in a frac­ ings. The mailer must pay fractional coming mixed with other mail which has tion of a cent in the total, the next higher postage in cash as provided in subpara­ to be faced, canceled, and postmarked in even cent must be paid. In addition, a graph (1) of this paragraph when the the post office. Each class and denomi­ new paragraph (f) (2) is added to give meter stamps do not fully pay the mini­ nation must be bundled together if pos­ instructions governing the payment of mum per piece charge on bulk third- sible. Special delivery and airmail fractional postage by meter users whose class mailings. The postmaster will issue should always be bundled separately or meters are incapable of fully prepaying a permit under which such payments located on the top of a bundle. (See the minimum per piece charge on bulk part 24 of this chapter for mailing of shall be recorded separately from pay­ third-class mailings. As amended and ments made for regular permit imprint third-class bulk mail and see § 34.5(f) (2) revised paragraph (f) reads as follows: of this chapter regarding payment of mailings. A separate application fee fractional postage in cash when the § 34.5 Mailings with permit imprints. (see § 34.1(a) of this chapter) must be meter stamp does not fully pay the min­ ***** paid for the permit to pay fractional imum per piece charge.) Properly pre­ postage payments in cash. A statement pared metered mail can go direct to the (f) Payment of postage.—(1) Pre­ on Form 3602 for the cash portion (see distribution cases in post offices and payment in full required. The mailer paragraph (e) of this section) and a thereby be expedited in dispatch. must pay for each mailing when it is statement on Form 3602-PC for the * * * * * presented at the post office, or make an advance deposit of enough to cover more meter payment portion (see § 24.4(b) (4) Note: The corresponding Postal Manual (ii) of this chapter) shall be filed by the section is 143.61. than one mailing. Payments for post­ mailer. n . In Part 34, make the following age or deposits must be made at points changes: designated by the postmaster. These ***** A. The forms of permits illustrated in payments will hot be accepted by em­ No t e : The corresponding Postal Manual § 34.4 have been updated and illustra­ ployees handling the mail. Advance de- section is 144.56.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3120 RULES AND REGULATIONS m . In § 48.4, paragraph (b) (2) is Miscellaneous Amendments to (c) Return receipts. amended to remove the provision that Chapter (Not available for mail insured for $15 refused insured mail will be returned or less) immediately. As so amended paragraph A notice of proposed revision in Parts (1) Requested at time of mailing: (b) (2) reads as follows: 51, 52, 53, 58, 61, 132, and 133 of Title Showing to whom and when de­ 39, Code of Federal Regulations, was livered _l______------. 25 § 48.4 Retention periods. published in the F ederal R egister of Showing to whom, when, and ad­ * * * * , # January 11, 1966 (31 F.R. 294-295), and, dress where delivered______. 35 ( 2) Requested after mailing: (b) Registered, insured, C.O.D., and subsequently, typographical corrections Showing to whom and when de­ appeared in the issues of January 13, livered ___ .25 certified mail. * * * 1966 (31 F.R. 434), January 15, 1966 (31 (2) Insured and certified mail is heldF.R. 538), and January 18, 1966 (31 F.R. N ote: The corresponding Post Manual sec­ a maximum of 15 days. It is held a lesser tion is 162.21 number of days if the sender so specifies. 564). The proposed revisions would (See also § 48.2(g)(1) of this chapter.) increase rates in registry, insurance, c.o.d., money orders, and certified mail, PART 53— COD ***** and would become effective on March in . Note: The corresponding Postal Manual 26, 1966. Interested persons were given Section 53.1 is amended to read section Is 158.422. 30 days in which to submit written com­ as follows: ments with respect to the proposed in­ § 53.1 Fees (in addition to postage). § 52.5 [Amended] creases. A few written comments have been Amount to be collected or insur- COD IV. In § 52.5 Delivery, paragraphs (a) received by the Department. After most ance coverage desired: fee (3) and (4) are deleted to make renewed careful consideration, the Department $0.01 to $10------$0.60 delivery attempts for insured parcels the has reached the conclusion to adopt the $10.01 to $25__.------.70 same as those for ordinary parcels and proposed fees as published, without $25.01 to $50— _------.80 to eliminate former requirements for $50.01 to $100______.90 amendment. $100.01 to $200—„ ______1.00 payment of local rate postage. As so adopted, the amendments to be Restricted delivery------,------. 50 N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual effective on March 26, 1966, are as Notice of nondelivery------.05 sections are 162.513 and 162.514. follows: Alteration of charges or delivery------. 10 (R.S. 161, as amended; 5 U.S.C. 22; 39 U.S.C. PART 51— REGISTRY N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual sec­ 501,505) tion is 163.1 H arvey H . H annah, I. Section 51.2 paragraph (a) is Acting General Counsel. amended to read as follows: § 51.2 Fees and liability. PART 58— CERTIFIED MAIL [F.R. Doc. 66-1928; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] (a) Fees. IV. Section 58.3 is amended to read as follows: Fees (in addition to postage) § 58.3 Fees. Cents Value Fee in addition to postage------30 For articles not covered by For articles also covered by commercial or other insurance commercial or other insurance Restricted delivery------50 Return receipts: Requested at tim e of m ailing: $0.00 to $100------—— $0.75 $0.75 1.00 1.00 Showing to whom and when de­ $100.01 to $200...... -...... — livered ______10 $200.01 to $400------1.25 1.25 $400.01 to $600------1.50 1.50 Showing to whom, when, and ad­ $600.01 to $800------1.75 1.75 dress where delivered------35 $800.01 to $1,000------2.00 2.00 , Requested after mailing: $1,000.01 to $2,000------2.25 . Showing to whom and when de­ $2,000.01 to $3,000------2.50 ' $3,000.01 to $4,000...... ------— 2.75 livered------25 $4,000.01 to $5.000------3.00 $2.00 plus handling charge of 15 cents per $1,000 or fraction ote $5,000.01 to $6,000------3.25 N : The corresponding Postal Manual sec­ $6,000.01 to $7,000— ------3.50 over first $1,000. tion is 168.3 $7,000.01 to $8,000------—— 3.75 $8.000.01 to $9,000------4.00 $9,000.01 to $10,000------4.25 $10,000.01 to $ , , ...... $4.25 plus handling charge of 15 PART 61— MONEY ORDERS 1 000 000 cents per $1,000 or fraction over first $io,000. V. Section 61.1, paragraph (b) (2) is amended to read as follows: $1 000 000 01 to $15,000,000.______$152.75 plus handling charge of $151.85 plus handling charge of 10 cents pot $1,000 or fraction 10 cents per $1,000 or fraction over first $1,000,000. over first $1,000,000. § 61.1 Issuance of domestic money or­ ders. Over $15.000,000...... —- ...... Additional charges may be made based on considerations of weight, space, and value. ***** (b) Amounts, fees, payments. * * * (2) Money order fees. ADDITIONAL SERVICES PART 52— INSURANCE Extra fee H. Section 52.2 paragraph (a) is (cents) Amount of fee amended to read as follows : % Amount of money order COD (Maximum amount collectible is International $2 00) ______60 § 52.2 Fees. Domestic RESTRICTED DELIVERY------50 (a) Fees (in addition to postage). T RETURN RECEIPTS: $0.01 to $10...... $0.25 $0.45 Requested at time of mailing: $10.01 to $50------.35 . 65 Liability: Fee .75 Showing to whom and when de­ $0.01 to $15------$0.20 $50.01 to $100...... — .40 livered ------10 $15.01 to $50______.30 Showing to whom, when, and ad­ $50.01 to $100------— .40 N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual sec­ dress where delivered------35 $100.01 to $150,______.50 tion is 171.122. Requested after mailing: $150.01 to $200____ .60 Showing to whom and when de­ Liability for insured mail is limited to $200. livered ______- 25 PART 132— REGISTRATION (b) Note : The corresponding Postal Manual sec­ Restricted delivery. tion is 161.21 (Not available for mail insured for $15 VI. Section 132.3 is amended to read or less)___ - ______$0.50 as follows:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 3121 § 132.3 Fees. For Postal Union mail the fee is 75 cents. The same fee applies to registered Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE parcel post. See country items in § 168.5 Chapter XVII— Office of Emergency of this chapter. (See § 162.2 of this Planning chapter for indemnity provisions.) Note: The corresponding Postal Manual sec­ PART 1710— FEDERAL DISASTER tion is 242.3. ASSISTANCE PART 133— INSURANCE Grant in Lieu of Temporary Housing or VII. Section 133.3 is amended to read Other Emergency Shelter as follows: Section 1710.10(d) is amended by add­ § 133.3 Fees. ing the following subparagraph (3): Lim it of indemnity Fee § 1710.10 Criteria o f eligibility for finan­ Not over $15------.______$0.35 cial assistance. $15.01 to $50__ .'___ .45 ***** $50.01 to $100______.55 $100.01 to $150-______. 65 (d) * * * $150.01 to $200__ ...______. 75 (3) A Federal financial contribution $200.01 to $300______.95 $300.01 to $400______l. 15 toward the permanent replacement of $400.01 to $500______.__ j______i. 35 housing, for persons requiring such hous­ $500.01 to $600______1. 55 ing as a result of the disaster, in lieu of $600.01 to $700______1. 75 and in an amount no greater than that $700.01 to $800______l. 95 $800.01 to $900______2. 15 estimated to be required for temporary $900.01 to $1,000______„ .„ I : .. 2. 35 housing or other emergency shelter, N ote: The adoption of these international inay be authorized where such perma­ insurance and registry fees will necessitate nent replacement will expeditiously pro­ changes in the individual country items in vide essential housing: Provided, how­ § 168.5 of this chapter. This section will he ever, That this subparagraph (3) shall revised as soon as practicable to reflect these changes. There will be no change in the apply only in remote areas where satis­ limits of insurance as presently set forth in factory temporary housing or other the individual country item s in § 168.5 of emergency shelter cannot be made this chapter. readily available. (R.S. 161, as amended; 5 U.S.O. 22, 39 U.S.C. 501, 505, 506 and 507) Dated: February 18, i966.

H arvey H . H annah, F ranklin B . D ryden, Acting General Counsel. Acting Director, F ebruary 23,1966. Office of Emergency Planning. [F.R. Doc. 66-2052; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-2008; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:49 a.m.] 8:49 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3122 Proposed Rule Making

accordingly, and after adoption by the vision of personnel on other vessels being DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Commandant, the regulations as revised boarded or in the immediate area were are published in the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r . not adversely affected. In all reported Coast Guard 4. Each person or organization who cases, the use of the blue light was effec­ desires to submit comments, suggestions tive in communicating the identity of E 33 CFR Parts 80f 90, 95 ] or views in connection with the proposed the law enforcement vessel with the boats regulations set forth in the Merchant and vessels desired to be boarded com­ [ 46 CFR Part 10 1 Marine Council Public Hearing Agenda, ing to an immediate stop. The proposed [CGFR 66—5] including changes proposed in this doc­ distinctive blue light would be for addi­ ument, should submit them in triplicate tional identification purposes and would NAVIGATION AND VESSEL so that they will be received by the Com­ be used by law enforcement vessels only INSPECTION mandant (CMC), U.S. ,Coast Guard when approaching another vessel for the Headquarters, Washington, D.C., 20226, purpose of boarding, warning or other Public Hearing on Proposed Changes prior to March 18, 1966. In order to valid law enforcement action. This insure consideration of written com­ distinctive blue light when used by law 1. The Merchant Marine Council will ments and to facilitate checking and re­ enforcement vessels would be in addition hold a public hearing on Monday, March cording, it is very helpful if each com­ to the prescribed lights and day signals 21,1966, commencing at 9:30 a.m., in the ment regarding a section or paragraph required by law or regulation. The use Departmental Auditorium, between 12th of the proposed regulations in this docu­ of a distinctive light as proposed either and 14th Streets on Constitution Avenue ment would show the section number during daytime or nighttime should pro­ NW., Washington, D.C., for the purpose (if any), the subject, the proposed mote safety at sea because patrol craft of receiving comments, views, and data change, the reason or basis, and the would be readily identified and vessels on the proposed changes in the naviga­ name, business firm or organization (if observing such a light would recognize tion and vessel inspection rules and reg­ any) and the address of the submitter. their law enforcement missions. ulations. The first 12 items containing It is also very helpful if comments are 9. The proposed distinctive light con­ those proposals are described in detail in submitted on Form CG-3287, and a small sists of a blue light of low intensity with the Merchant Marine Council Public quantity of this form is attached to the a short effective range. When turned Hearing Agenda (CG-249), dated March printed copies which are being mailed on, the blue light is continually visible 21, 1966, and are generally described in direct to interested parties. Additional but pulsates by means of a rotating re­ a notice of proposed rule making (CGFR copies of the forms may be reproduced flector which gives a flashing or periodic 65-65) published in the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r by typewriter or otherwise. ; peak intensity effect. All a'round visibil­ of February 10,1966 (31 F.R. 2602—2614). 5. Each item of the Agenda has been ity is not a requirement; in fact, a shield 2. This document contains additional given a general title, intended to encom­ or fixed screen designed to restrict the proposed regulations, together with ap­ pass the Specific proposals presented. It arc of visibility may be used, particularly propriate references to statutory author­ is urged that each item be read com­ in congested areas. ities, which will be considered by the pletely because the application of pro­ 10. The Advisory Panel of State Offi­ Merchant Marine Council at the public posals to the specific employment òr cials to the Merchant Marine Council, hearing on March 21, 1966. The com­ types of vessels may be found in more U.S. Coast Guard, at a meeting held plete text of the proposed regulations is than one item. Proposals are added to November 10, 1965, recommended that a set forth herein under the appropriate Item IX and Item XI. rotating blue light be authorized as op­ headings for each topic. Printed copies tional additional equipment for use by of this document will be mailed to persons I t e m IX.—R u l e s o f t h e R oad all law enforcement vessels and that and organizations who have expressed a ixe.—DISTINCTIVE BLUE LIGHTS AUTHORIZED such authorization be incorporated into continued interest in the subjects under FOR USE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT VESSELS the rules of the road. This distinctive consideration and have requested that uniform light would be limited to marine copies be furnished them. Copies will be 7. Difficulties have been experienced law enforcement patrol craft of the also furnished upon request to the Com­ by law enforcement vessels engaged in United States, and the various States or mandant (CMC), U.S. Coast Guard, direct law enforcement action because political subdivisions thereof. Washington, D.C., 20226, so long as they there is not available a distinctive identi­ are available. After the supply of extra fication that other vessels may easily PART 80— PILOT RULES FOR INLAND printed copies is exhausted, copies will recognize. Spotlights are effective in WATERS be available for reading purposes only in communicating a desire for vessels to Room 4211, Coast Guard Headquarters, stop only at a very short range and even 11. It is proposed to add as § 80.45 to or at the offices of the various Coast when spotlights are used they often do Part 80 the following: Guard District Commanders. not indicate a definite law enforcement § 80.45 Distinctive blue light authorized 3. Comments on the proposed regula­ mission. Furthermore, the flashing of a for use by law enforcement vessels. spotlight on another vessel so as to blind tions set forth herein are invited. (a) The use of a distinctive light de­ Written comments containing construc­ the navigator or operator is prohibited by law. Sirens and loud hailers fre­ scribed in paragraph (b) of this section tive criticism, suggestions or views are is authorized for law enforcement ves­ welcome. However, acknowledgement of quently cannot be heard above the wind, sea and engine noises, and, at even a sels, and may be displayed during the the comments received or reasons why day or night, whenever the vessel may be the suggested changes were or were not short distance, are often not direc­ tionally identifiable.- engaged in direct law enforcement activ­ adopted cannot be furnished since per­ 8. A trial program was conducted by ities where identification of the law en­ sonnel are not available to handle the thè Coast Guard to test the effective-, forcement vessel is desirable or where necessary correspondence involved. ness of identification of law enforcement necessary for safety reasons. This light Each oral or written comment is con­ vessels by the use of a distinctive blue when used would be in addition to pre­ sidered and evaluated. If it is believed colored light. In the trial program no scribed lights and day signals required the comment, view or suggestion clarifies adverse effects were noted. The night by law or regulations in this part. or improves the proposed regulation or vision Of law enforcement personnel on (b) The distinctive light prescribed is amendment, such proposal is changed the Coast Guard vessels, or the night a blue colored, revolving horizontal

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3123

beam, low intensity light, rotating or I tem X I.— M erchant M arine O fficers “master of freight and towing vessels of appearing to rotate because of a pulsat­ and M erchant S eamen not more than 1,000 gross tons” who also ing effect gained by means of a rotat­ applies for endorsement as "pilot”; such ing reflector which causes a flashing or X lb .— DECK LICENSES AS MASTER AND PILOT AND AS MATE AND PILOT OF FREIGHT AND endorsement as “pilot” is not separable periodic peak intensity effect. The light from that as master and is valid only shall be located at any effective point on TOWING VESSELS OF NOT MORE THAN 1 ,0 0 0 GROSS TONS while the holder is serving in the capacity the forward exterior of the vessel. A as master or mate. shield or other device, fixed or movable, 17. In manning small inspected (2) At least one-third of the experi­ to restrict the arc of visibility may be freight or towing vessels, which do not ence required must have been acquired used if desired. exceed 1,000 gross tons in size and oper­ on vessels of more than 100 gross tons. (c) The distinctive blue light de­ate on United States’ waters requiring Experience on vessels of less than 15 scribed in this section may be displayed their navigation to be performed by gross tons will not be considered as by law enforcement vessels of the United pilots, the Coast Guard has allowed per­ qualifying. States, a State, or its political subdivi­ sons to serve in a dual capacity as (3) Six months of the experience re­ sions, including municipalities, having “master and first class pilot” or “mate quired shall have been acquired in the administrative control over use of navi­ and first class pilot.” The law provides area for which application is made; 3 gable waters, duly authorized by a con­ that a person’s pilotage qualifications months of which must have been ac­ trolling Federal or State governmental may be endorsed on licenses of masters quired within the year preceding the agency. and mates. The present requirements to application. 12. The authority to prescribe regula­obtain a license or endorsement as First (4) Any holder of a deck license of tions regarding navigation requirements Class Pilot for such small vessels now equal or superior grade may be consid­ for Inland Waters is in section 157 in appear to be unnecessarily restrictive. ered eligible for license as master and Title 33, U.S. Code; The applicable au­ The establishment of qualifications and pilot upon presentation of evidence of thorities are also cited with the present issuance of licenses as “master and pilot” service required by subparagraph (3) in regulations in 33 CFR Part 80. The or “mate and pilot” for manning of such this paragraph and satisfactory comple­ delegation of authority for the Com­ vessels appears appropriate at this time. tion of examination on subjects in mandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe It is also proposed to allow masters and § 10.05-52(a) (1), (a) (14), and (b). regulations is in Treasury Department mates who qualify for service as pilot in (5) Tonnage limitations commen­ Order 107-33, September 23, 1958, 23 those areas in which they have had ex­ surate with the experience of the appli­ F.R. 7592. perience to be licensed to serve as cant will be established by the Officer in “master and pilot” or “mate and pilot,” Charge, Marine Inspection. To be eligi­ PART 90— PILOT RULES FOR THE when meeting certain qualifications ble for the maximum limitation of 1,000 GREAT LAKES deemed necessary for pilots of such small gross tons, the applicant must have ac­ vessels. quired at least 50 percent of his qualify­ 13. It is proposed to add as § 90.30 to 18. It is proposed to add requirements ing experience on vessels of more than Part 90 the following: to present regulations governing deck 200 gross tons. § 90.30 Distinctive blue light authorized licenses which will allow the issuance of (6) The Officer in Charge, Marine In­ for use by law enforcement vessels. deck licenses to qualified persons as spection, will determine the geographi­ “master and pilot” or as “mate and pilot” N ote: The text of § 90.30 shall be the cal limitations of each license commen­ same as the text of § 80.45 in paragraph 11 of small freight and towing vessels only surate with the experience and qualifica­ of this document, and all changes in § 80.45 and subject to other limitations based on tions of the applicant. will be included in this section. the holders’ qualifications and experi­ (b) Experience requirements. T h e ence. Under the proposed concept the 14. The authority to prescribe regu­ minimum service required to qualify an holder of the license as “master and applicant for license as master and pilot lations regarding navigation require­ pilot” may only act as pilot on those ves­ ments for the Great Lakes is in section of freight and towing vessels of not more sels on which he is serving as a “master” than 1,000 gross tons is 4 years on deck 243 in Title 33, U.S. Code. The appli­ or “mate.” The holder of a license as including: cable authorities are also cited with the “mate and pilot” may only act as pilot present regulations in 33 CFR Part 90. (1) One year’s service as licensed mate on those vessels on which he is serving as and pilot; or, The delegation of authority for the Com­ a “mate.” The proposed regulations for mandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe (2) Two years’ service as unlicensed experience and examination as “master” master; or, regulations is in Treasury Department or “mate” are essentially the same as ex­ Order 120, July 31, 1950,15 F.R. 6521. (3) Two years’ service as quartermas­ isting requirements. However, the ex­ ter or wheelsman while holding a license perience and examination requirements for pilotage are less stringent than those as mate and pilot or first class pilot; or, PART 95— PILOT RULES FOR now applicable for First Class Pilots. (4) Two years’ service as unlicensed WESTERN RIVERS mate while holding a license as operator The proposed pilotage endorsement on of small passenger vessels valid within 15. It is proposed to add as § 95.80 to the licenses of “master” or “mate” will the area for which application is made; Part 95 the following: bear geographical limitations which will or, be determined on overall experience in (5) Three years’ service as unlicensed § 95.80 Distinctive blue light authorized a general area rather than specific ex­ for use by law enforcement vessels. mate. perience in a specific area as now used 20. It is proposed to insert § 10.05-36 N ote: The text of § 95.80 shall be the same for First Class Pilots. This will author­ as the text of § 80.45 in paragraph 11 of this reading as follows: document, and all changes in § 80.45 will be ize service in a much broader sense. included in th is section. § 10.05—36 Mate and pilot, freight and Subpart 10.05— Professional Require­ towing vessels not more than 1,000 16. The authority to prescribe regu­ ments for Officer's Licenses (In­ gross tons. lations regarding navigation require­ spected Vessels) ments for Western Rivers is in section (a) General. (1) This section shall 353 in Title 33, U.S. Code. The appli­ 19. It is proposed to insert § 10.05-6 apply to every applicant for a license as cable authorities are also cited with the reading aafollows: “mate of freight and towing vessels of present regulations in 33 CFR Part 95. not more than 1,000 gross tons” who also The delegation of authority for the § 10.05-6 Master and pilot, freight and applies for endorsement as “pilot”; such Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to pre­ towing vessels not more than 1,000 gross tons. endorsement as “pilot” is not separable scribe regulations is in Treasury Depart­ from that as mate and is valid only while ment Order 167-33, September 23, 1958, (a) General. (1) This section shall the holder is serving in the capacity as 23 F.R. 7592. apply to every applicant for a license as mate.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No. 38- 3124 PROPOSED RULE MAKING (2) At least one-third of the experi­ (12) Rules and regulations. edge of the area for which he has made ence required must have been acquired (13) Ship’s business. application as pilot, using local charts, on vessels of more than 100 gross tons. (14) Such further examination as the including those subjects described in Experience on vessels of less than 15 Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, § 10.05—52(b). gross tons will not be considered as may consider necessary to establish the (c) The applicant shall demonstrate qualifying. applicant’s proficiency. a satisfactory ability to navigate a vessel (3) Six months of the experience re­ (b) The applicant shall demonstrate within the area for which he has made quired shall have been acquired in the by oral examination a practical knowl­ application using such methods as are area for which application is made, 3 edge of the area for which he has made commonly used. months of which must have been ac­ application as pilot, using local charts, (d) An applicant for extension of quired within 1 year preceding the including: route shall be examined in subjects in application. (1) General geographical description subparagraphs (1) and (11) in para­ (4) Any holder of a deck license of of the area, indicating location of ports graph (a) and paragraph (b) of this sec­ equal or superior grade may be consid­ and harbors, general configuration of tion. ered eligible for license as mate and pilot waterways, and the general tidal effects 23. The authority to prescribe regu­ upon presentation of evidence of service within the area. lations governing the issuance of licenses required by subparagraph (3) herein and . (2) General traffic patterns in the area is in sections 214, 224, 224a, 225, 226, 228, satisfactory completion of examination and general type of traffic to be 230, 231, 233, 237, 367, 391a, 404, and 405 on subjects in § 10.05-58 (a) (1), (a) (11), encountered. in Title 46, U.S. Code, and section 198 in and (b). (3) • More apparent hazards to navi­ Title 50, U.S. Code. The applicable au-' (5) Tonnage limitations commensu­ gation with their general descriptions thorities are also cited with the present rate with the experience of the appli­ and locations. regulations in 46 CFR Part 10. The dele­ cant will be established by the Officer in (4) General description of major aids gations of authority for the Comman­ Charge, Marine Inspection. To be eligi­ to navigation including topographical dant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe reg­ ble for the maximum limitation of 1,000 aids. ulations are in Treasury Department gross tons, the applicant must have (5) General description of winds and Orders 120, July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 6521; acquired at least 50 percent of his quali­ currents in the area, especially those of 167-14, November 26, 1954,19 F.R. 8026; fying experience on vessels of more than peculiar force or effect. and 167-20, June 18, 1956, 21 P.R. 4894. 200 gross tons. (6) Special and peculiar hazards to Dated: February 23,1966. (6) The Officer in Charge, Marine In­ navigation. spection, will determine the geographical (7) Special rules, signals, and customs [ s e a l ] E. J. R o l a n d , limitations of each license commensu­ of the area. Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, rate with the experience and qualifica­ (8) Methods of determining courses, Commandant. distances, and positions using the chart. tions of the applicant. [F.R. Doc. 66-2055; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; (b) Experience requirements. The (c) The applicant shall demonstrate a 8:49 a.m.] minimum service required to qualify an satisfactory ability to navigate a ves­ applicant for license as mate and pilot sel within the area for which he has of freight and towing vessels of not more made application using such methods as than 1,000 gross tons is 2 years on deck are commonly used. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE including: (d) An applicant for extension of route (1) One year’s service in a watchstand­ shall be examined in subjects in subpara­ Agricultural Research Service ing capacity while holding a license as graphs (1) and (14) of paragraph (a) operator of small passenger vessels valid and paragraph (b) of this section. 17 CFR Part 3191 within the area for which application 22. It is proposed to insert § 10.05-58 is made; or, reading as follows: FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES (2) One year’s service as unlicensed § 10.05—58 Examination as mate and pi­ Importation of Nursery Stock, Plants, mate; or, lot, freight and towing vessels not and Seeds (3) Eighteen months’ service as quar­ more than 1,000 gross tons. termaster or wheelsman. Notice is hereby given under section 21. It is proposed to insert a new (a) An applicant for license as mate and pilot shall pass a satisfactory written 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act § 10.05-52 reading as follows: examination as to his knowledge of the (5 U.S.C. 1003) that, pursuant to the § 10.05—52 Examination as master and subjects listed in this paragraph: provisions of sections 7 and 9 of the pilot, freight and towing vessels not (1) Rules of the road. Plant Quarantine Act of August 20, 1912 more than 1,000 gross tons. (2) Practical use of the magnetic (7 U.S.C. 160, 162), it is proposed to (а) An applicant for license as mas­ compass. amend §§ 319.37(b) and 319.37-19(c) of ter and pilot shall pass a satisfactory (3) Instruments and accessories. the regulations relating to the importa­ written examination as to his knowledge (4) Chart navigation. tion of nursery stock, plants, and seeds of the subjects listed in this paragraph. (5) Aids to navigation. (7 CFR 319.37(b), 319.37-19(0) in the (1) Rules of the road. (6) Special signals. following respects: (2) Practical use of the magnetic com­ (7) Cargo stowage and handling. (a) Amend § 319.37(b) as follows: pass. (8) Seamanship. (1) Delete therefrom the following (3) Instruments and accessories. (9) Lifesaving and firefighting. items now appearing in the “Plant ma­ (4) Chart navigation. (10) Rules and regulations. terial”, “Foreign country or countries (5) Aids to navigation. (11) Such other examination as the from which prohibited”, and “Injurious (б) Special signals. Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, insect or plant disease determined as (7) Stability and ship construction. existing in the country or countries (8) Cargo handling and stowage. may consider necessary to establish the (9) Seamanship. applicant’s proficiency. named and capable of being transported (10) Lifesaving and firefighting. (b) The applicant shall demonstrate in the prohibited plant material” tabular (11) Ship sanitation. by oral examination a practical knowl­ columns, respectively :

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3125 ten submissions made pursuant to this Malus spp. (except vegetatively- Austria. ______Diaporthe mail Bres. (Leaf, branch and fruit produced understocks). fungus). notice wil be made available for public China______*___ Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M. inspection at such times and places and Miura (Branch canker fungus). in a manner convenient to the public Europe______Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) Honey (Brown rot of fruit). business (7 CFR 1.27(b)). Japan______Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) Honey (Brown rot of fruit). Done at Washington, D.C., this 18th Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M. day of February 1966. Miura (Branch canker fungus). Korea____ ;______Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and [ seal] R. J. A nderson, fruit fungus). Manchuria______Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) Deputy Administrator, Honey (Brown rot of fruit). Agricultural Research Service. Malus spp. South Africa..______.... ___ Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) Honey (Brown rot of fruit). [F.R. Doc. 66-2014; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Mottle leaf or mosaic chlorosis of apple 8:49 ajn.] (Virus). Prunus spp_.______Germany______.______Pox-disease virus of sweet cherry. Switzerland______Bigi cherry disease virus. Prunus spp. (except vegetatlvely- Europe, Asia, Africa. Oceania A diversity of plant diseases. produced understocks). (including Australia and New Consumer and Marketing Service Zealand). Prunus spp______;______All foreign countries, except A diversity of plant diseases. 17 CFR Part 1012] Canada, when destined to California. [Docket No. AO-347-A1] Pyrus spp. (except vegetatlvely- Europe, Japan, Manchuria, Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) produced understocks). and South Africa. Honey (Brown rot of fruit). Japan and China______Gymnosporangium haraeanum Syd. (Bust).' MILK IN TAMPA BAY MARKETING Gymnosporangium japonicum Syd. (Bust). AREA Korea______Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and fruit disease). . Notice of H earing on Proposed Amendments to Tentative Market­ (2) In lieu of the deleted items, substitute in the respective tabular columns and in alphabetical order, the following: ing Agreement and Order Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ Malus spp. All foreign countries____ A diversity of plant diseases, including but cultural Marketing Agreement Act of hot limited to: 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Diaporthe mali Bres. (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus). and the applicable rules of practice and Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) procedure governing the formulation of Honey (Brown rot of fruit). Mottle leaf or mosaic chlorosis of apple marketing agreements and marketing (Virus). orders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus). given of a public hearing to be held at “ Proliferation” (Virus). the Sheraton Tampa Motor Inn, 515 East “ King spot” (Virus). Cass Street, Tampa, Fla., beginning at 10 “Bosette” (Virus). Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M. Miura a.m., e.s.t., on March 7,1966, with respect (Branch canker fungus). to proposed amendments to the tentative Prunusspp. All foreign countries. A diversity of plant diseases, including but not limited to: marketing agreement and to the order, Pox-disease virus of sweet cherry. regulating the handling of milk in the Bigi cherry disease virus. Pyrus spp... All foreign countries.. A diversity of plant diseases, including but Tampa Bay marketing area. not limited to: The public hearing is for the purpose Gymnosporangium haraeanum Syd. (Bust). of receiving evidence with respect to the Gymnosporangium japonicum Syd. (Bust). Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) economic and marketing conditions Honey (Brown rot of fruit). which relate to the proposed amend­ Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and fruit disease). ments, hereinafter set forth, and any “Proliferation” (Virus). appropriate modifications thereof, to the tentative marketing agreement and to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3126 PROPOSED RULE MAKING Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 20250. or 9. All the text beginning with the 21stently in Class H and Class III uses gen­ may be there inspected. paragraph to and including the 29th erally to increase prices for producer paragraph (beginning with the words milk used in products other than fluid Signed at Washington, D.C., on Feb­ “ I t was not shown on the record * * *” milk products. The various pricing pro­ ruary 18, 1966. and ending with the phrase “the pro­ posals are described in more detail C l a r e n c e H. G ir a r d , posal is denied.”) are relocated to im­ below. Deputy Administrator, mediately precede subheading 4. Inci­ Producer proponents stated the fol­ Regulatory Programs. dental and conforming changes. Fur­ lowing reasons for their classification [F.R. Doc. 66-2016; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; ther, certain editorial changes were and pricing proposals: (1) To assure 8:49 a.m.] made in the first sentence of the 21st that all producer milk used to produce paragraph. cottage cheese and ice cream will be The material issues on the record of priced as Class II milk irrespective of the hearing relating to the Greater Cin­ the plant (pool or nonpool) in which [ 7 CFR Parts 1033, 1034 1 cinnati and Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, such products are processed; (2) To [Docket Nos. AO—166—A30 and AO-175-A21] milk orders are: establish prices for milk used in non­ 1. Various modifications of the Class fluid products at a competitive level but MILK IN GREATER CINCINNATI AND I, II, and III milk definitions and Class yet not sufficiently attractive to encour­ DAYTON-SPRINGFIELD, OHIO, II and Class III pricing formulas (includ­ age their production at the expense of MARKETING AREAS ing butterfat differentials) of the Greater higher valued use in fluid form; and (3) Cincinnati order, as follows: To minimize the opportunity for use of Decision on Proposed Amendments to a. Reclassification of certain or all producer milk for nonfluid products in Tentative Marketing Agreements Class i n milk products into Class n and any pool plant while other pool plants and to Orders revision of Class n and Class III pricing may be short of producer milk for fluid Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ formulas; requirements. cultural Marketing Agreement Act of b. Revision of Class II and Class III In support of such proposals producers 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), butterfat differentials; pointed to (1) the rapid Class I sales and the applicable rules of practice and c. Reclassification to Class II or Class growth in the Cincinnati market in re­ procedure governing the formulation of HI of certain milk products now classi­ cent months, increasing the opportuni­ ¡marketing agreements and marketing fied as Class I. ties for producer milk to be sold in Class orders (7 CFR Part 900), a joint public 2. Revision of location adjustments ap­ I; (2) the relatively low price applicable hearing was held at Cincinnati, Ohio, plicable to class and uniform prices under to Class m milk (primarily milk and on October 20-21, 1965, pursuant to no­ the Greater Cincinnati order; skim milk for condensing and evaporat­ tice thereof issued October 5, 1965 (30 3. Revision of the maximum adjust­ ing) especially in the months of March F.R. 12846). ment permitted under the supply- through August, which has encouraged Upon the basis of the evidence intro­ demand adjustor to the Class I prices the use of producer milk in such class duced at the hearing and the record under both orders; and while outside sources were relied upon thereof, the Deputy Administrator on 4. Incidental and conforming changes for fluid purposes; (3) the difficulty of February 1,1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. DoC. in order provisions. attracting sufficient producer milk to 66-1252), filed with the Hearing Clerk, Findings and conclusions. The follow­ the market to meet growing Class I needs U.S. Department of Agriculture, his ing findings and conclusions on the mate­ with the Cincinnati blend price lower recommended decision containing notice rial issues are based on evidence pre­ than blend prices of markets procuring of the opportunity to file written excep­ sented at the hearing and the record milk in competition with Cincinnati; tions thereto. thereof: and (4) the opportunity for nonpool The material issues, findings and con­ la. Reclassification of Class III milk cottage cheese and ice cream processors clusions, rulings, and general findings products and revision of Class II and in the Cincinnati market to purchase of the recommended decision (31 F.R. Class III pricing formulas. Present Class their ingredients from pool plants at a 2384; F.R. Doc. 66-1252) are hereby III milk, priced below Class n milk dur­ lower price under the order than pool approved and adopted and are set forth ing the months of March through Au­ handlers who process these products. in full herein subject to the following gust, should be eliminated. A new form­ The special Class m classification modifications: ula, based upon the Minnesota-Wisconsin during March through August should Under subheading la. Reclassifica­ manufacturing price series, for pricing be eliminated. At the present time'the tion of Class III milk products, etc., the the revised Class II milk should be primary uses of producer milk in Class following changes are made: adopted. i n (priced below Class II during the 1. The 10th paragraph is revised and A large producer organization pro­ months of March through August) are the first sentence of the 11th paragraph posed a merger of present Class H milk condensed skim milk and butterfat for is deleted. and Class i n milk into one class to be ultimate processing into cottage cheese, 2. In the last sentence of the 17th designated Class II milk. This proposal ice cream mix, and ice cream. Rela­ paragraph, a phrase is deleted. was supported by another large associ­ tively smaller quantities of Class III are 3. Editorial changes are made in the ation. disposed of, however, as canned evap­ first sentence of the 19th paragraph. A handler proposed the reclassification orated or condensed milk, butter, and 4. In the 21st paragraph, a phrase is to Class H milk of all milk in present cheese. Much of the condensed < skim changed in the first sentence, and in Class i n other than that used to produce milk and cream for later conversion into the last sentence, the word “proposals” evaporated and condensed milk (or skim cottage cheese or ice cream is moved and the figure “7.8” are changed to “pro­ milk) in hermetically sealed cans. Clas­ to plants in the Cincinnati marketing visions” and “6.8”, respectively. sification of milk for the latter uses in area for actual processing. When the 5. The 22d paragraph is deleted and Class i n at a price lower than Class H cottage cheese or ice cream processor in three new paragraphs are added. milk would be extended from the March- the market operates a nonpool plant the Under subheading 3. Revision of sup­ August period to the entire year. condensed skim milk or butterfat so ply-demand adjustor, the following Another handler proposed the reclas­ utilized is accounted for as a Class III changes are made: sification to Class II milk of condensed item, but if the receiving processor is a 6. The eighth paragraph is revised skim milk or other Class n i product ulti­ pool handler such skim milk or butter­ slightly. mately utilized in cottage cheese or ice fat must be reclassified to Class II milk. 7. The ninth paragraph is deleted cream processed in any nonpool plant In both instances, however, the proc­ and a revised text of this paragraph is serving the Cincinnati marketing area. essor must purchase ingredients of sim­ contained in two new paragraphs relo­ Only Class HI milk so used in a Cin­ ilar inspected quality under prevailing cated to follow immediately after the cinnati pool plant is reclassified to Class health regulations. 35th paragraph. n at the present time. Similar classification for milk utilized 8. The 19th and 20th paragraphs are Each of such proponents would re­ at both types of plants (pool and non­ deleted. vise the formulas for pricing milk pres­ pool) throughout the year will insure

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3127 similar pricing on all producer milk use. Much of the hearing discussion re­ pares with $4.19 for Dayton-Springfield, utilized for cottage cheese and ice cream lated to the problems of handlers need­ $4.18 for Columbus, $4.09 for Louisville- manufacture in the market and tend ing Class I milk in obtaining the re­ Lexington-Evansville and $4.14 for to equalize raw ingredient costs between quired supplies* Nortwestern Ohio. pool handlers engaged in cottage cheese Under the condition that there is a These price relationships tend to en­ and ice cream manufacture and their growing market for producer milk in the courage producers away from the Cin­ unregulated competitors. highest valued Class I use, little incentive cinnati market rather than toward it. The conclusion to include present should be given under order pricing to the Moreover, nearly all milk in the milk- Class III milk together with present Class manufacture of local producer milk into shed is already associated with one or II milk in a new Class H requires con­ manufactured dairy products. Use in another of such fluid markets, and there sideration of an appropriate year-round these products should be limited as is diminishing opportunity to obtain any pricing formula for the new classifica­ nearly as practicable to the daily and substantial amount of Grade A milk for tion. Producer proponents of the com­ weekend reserve supplies resulting from the fluid market by conversion of nearby bined classification proposed that the an uneven bottling pattern during the dairy farmers producing ungraded milk. Class II price formula be established at week. Pricing policy under the order At the present time, premiums or haul­ the level of the “basic formula price for should encourage reliance on outside ing subsidies are being paid on approxi­ the current month.” Certain Cincinnati sources for such nonfluid uses when pro­ mately one-third of the milk supply as handlers favored this basis of pricing ducer milk is in relatively short supply certain handlers attempt to satisfy their provided that an alternative Class n for bottling requirements. needs for fluid uses. price become effective whenever the It is significant that the Cincinnati The increase in the return for milk basic formula price exceeds by more than utilization in Class I has tended to be for Class III uses through the reclassifi­ 10 cents the value of milk for manufac­ lower than in surrounding markets even cation and pricing provisions hereby pro­ turing into butter and powder. This though for several months handlers have posed for adoption not only will encour­ basis of pricing, including the butter- requested the associations to supply more age a higher utilization of producer milk powder formula limitation, should be milk for Class I use. For the first nine in Class I but also will improve the blend­ adopted. months of 1965 Cincinnati Glass I use ed prices so as to be somewhat more The order currently provides that for averaged 67 percent of producer receipts favorable in relation to competing mar­ the months of September through Feb­ compared to 79 percent in Dayton- kets. It is estimated that for the first 8 ruary the Class m price shall be the Springfield, 74 percent in Louisville-Lex- months of 1965 adoption of these provi­ same as the Class n price. The Class n ington-Evansville, 77 percent in Colum­ sions would have improved the Cincin­ price is determined by a “butter-nonfat bus, and 75 percent in Indianapolis. nati blend by an average of 6.8 cents per dry milk solids” formula which for 1964 During the period March-August 1965 hundredweight. averaged $3.16 per hundredweight. For when the lower Class HI price was avail­ The recommended decision concluded each of the months of March through able monthly quantities ranging from 7.8 that the price of milk in all lower valued August Class HI milk is priced separately million to 19.2 million pounds of pro­ uses should be increased to the level of by a formula under which the market ducer milk were disposed of in Class III the basic formula price. At such price administrator averages the monthly while monthly quantities of fluid milk- level, which is representative of the gen­ basic, or “field,” prices paid by five milk products imported from outside regu­ eral level of manufacturing milk prices, manufacturing plants in or near the lated and unregulated plants ranged there would be significantly greater in­ Cincinnati milkshed without reflection of from 2.4 million to 5.0 million pounds. ducement to the handler with excesses any bonuses for volume, quality, or bulk The major proportion of the latter quan­ over fluid needs to release producer milk tank which may be paid by such plants. tities was allocated to Class I and Class to other pool plants where the milk may For the months of March through August II while the above producer milk quanti­ be used for fluid purposes since the price 1965 the Class i n price averaged ap­ ties were priced in Class III. of producer milk in nonfluid uses would proximately $2.76 per hundredweight. Order pricing should not permit one not be less than alternative sources of During the same 6-month period the handler to purchase producer milk at less milk, or ingredients, for such uses. The Class n price averaged $3.16 per hun­ than the general level of prices for man­ importance of price alignment with near­ dredweight. ufacturing milk to utilize in nonfluid by competing markets for milk put to The basic formula price. (Minnesota- products while other handlers are seek­ nonfluid uses, such as cottage cheese and Wisconsin manufacturing milk price ing additional supplies for fluid pur­ ice cream, also was indicated. The series) on a “current month” basis aver­ poses. Only through an increase in the latter is a highly significant factor in aged $3.18 for the year 1964 and $3.22 percentage of producer milk in Class I arriving at an appropriate level of price for the 6 months March-August 1965. can lasting improvement of producer for this market. There is an obvious need in the Cincin­ blend prices result. The proposed in­ While adoption of the basic formula nati market to induce greater utilization crease in price applicable to milk for price as the means of pricing Class H of producer milk in Class I. One han­ nonfluid uses is an appropriate step to milk would result in substantial improve­ dler last spring completed a large fluid encourage the allocation or flow of avail­ ment insofar as intermarket price align­ milk and ice cream plant in the Cincin­ able producer milk to its optimum utili­ ment is concerned, it would not neces­ nati market which is designed to serve zation in the market. sarily produce precise alignment with not only its own outlets in the Cincin­ While the highest practicable utiliza­ nearby markets for this class of milk in nati market but also outlets in other tion of available supplies in Class I is an all months of the year. The exceptions markets including Dayton. At the time immediate objective, the allocation of point out the importance of attaining the this plant was opened its Dayton plant presently available supplies to this use most precise alignment possible in light was closed and the milk supply of the may not be sufficient to satisfy future of the intermarket competition present. Dayton plant moved to the Cincinnati Class I requirements. It is likewise im­ Use of an alternative Class n price for­ location. portant, therefore, that the Cincinnati mula, as proposed at the hearing, to It is the expressed intention of this market be in position to procure milk apply whenever the basic formula price handler to increase fluid sales from this competitively with other nearby markets. exceeds the price produced by the alter­ Cincinnati plant to already established The requirements for fluid use are in­ outlets in several other markets as native formula would provide the same creasing. However, the Cincinnati mar­ Class II price as prevails in the Colum­ rapidly as a supply buildup will permit. ket is unfavorably situated at this time The handler is currently requesting pro­ from the standpoint of procurement of bus, Northwestern Ohio, Northeastern ducer organizations to furnish additional additional supplies or even of holding the Ohio, and Indianapolis markets which supplies and testified to the difficulty of current level of supplies. Blend prices are competitors with Cincinnati in supply procuring additional supplies at current in markets competing for milk have gen­ or sales, or both. Taking into account blend prices. Certain other" handlers erally been higher than for Cincinnati the pricing of all Class H milk, including also have experienced expanded sales in in 1965. For the first 8 months the Cin­ milk to butter, in the Dayton-Springfield recent months and similarly have re­ cinnati blend price averaged $4.03 per market, a very close alignment with the quested additional milk supplies for fluid hundredweight f.o.b. market. This com- latter market also may be achieved.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3128 PROPOSED RULE MAKING It is concluded that the alternative butterfat differential is the Chicago 92 cake mix in Class I simply because of its formula proposed (identical to that used score butter times 0.118 less a minor ad­ manufacture in a regulated milk plant. in the Columbus market) should be justment for skim milk replaced as the It is concluded therefore that the “fluid adopted. Such alternative formula will fat content of milk changes. milk product” definition should be modi­ permit intermarket handler competition In support of this proposal proponents fied to exclude pancake mix, thus effect­ within the region on substantially equal cited the trend toward lower butterfat ing the reclassification of any skim milk terms insofar as procurement cost is con­ content in milk and certain milk prod­ and butterfat used therein to the revised cerned. While on a yearly average basis ucts and the increasing need for solids- Class II milk. This change is consistent the alternative formula would have not-fat relative to butterfat in the Cin­ with the proponent handler’s request moderated a Class II (basic formula) cinnati market. Producers believe a bet­ that the Class II category for this product price by 2 cents per hundredweight in ter utilization of the milk supply will be be permitted in the event a two-class sys­ 1964 and for the first 10 months of 1965 encouraged by this action as well as by tem evolved from the hearing. There by 5 cents per hundredweight, individual an increase in the price for nonfluid uses. was no opposition to the reclassification monthly variations between the basic The proposed butterfat differential of requested. formula price and the alternative for­ 11.5 percent of the Chicago butter price Accounting for milk in sterilized cream. mula price in such period ranged from 0 is reasonably related to the level of the Sterilized cream received and disposed of to 12 cents per hundredweight. For ex­ revised Class II price and will reflect the in the same glass or metal hermetically ample, in the absence of the alternative same value of butterfat as that provided sealed container should be excluded from formula, a difference of as much as 12 for in the Columbus, Northeastern Ohio the definitions of “Class I milk” and cents could have prevailed in January and Northwestern Ohio markets. A rea­ “other source milk.” This will have the 1965 between the Columbus and Cincin­ sonable alignment of butterfat values effect of exempting this product (when nati Class n prices. We may not con­ will be maintained also with the Day- received and disposed of without repack­ clude on this record that such a dif­ ton-Springfield market. aging) from the reporting, classification ference is appropriate or desirable. Also, lc. Reclassification of certain fluid and pricing provisions of the order and the cooperatives, which assume substan­ milk products. Pancake mix now clas­ require only that records be maintained tial responsibility for filling the milk sified as Class I when processed by a of its receipt and disposition, similar to supply needs of Cincinnati handlers, will handler should be reclassified to Class records currently required of handlers be in better position to dispose of any n milk. Milk used for sterilized cream with respect to packaged butter and temporary surpluses left in their hands packaged in hermetically sealed metal or cheese received and disposed of without without incurring an undue price burden. glass containers which is received and repackaging. Since there are outlets for available disposed of without repackaging should Certain handlers proposed that “steril­ producer milk supplies at higher prices, be made exempt from classification by ized products packaged in hermetically the handler proposal to retain producer modifying the “Class I milk” and “other sealed containers” either be reclassified milk utilized for canned evaported or source milk” definitions. In addition, a from Class I to the lowest-priced use condensed milk in Class III at a price change should be made in defining those class or be made exempt from classifica­ which averages about 15 cents per hun­ sour cream mixtures which are desig­ tion. Testimony of proponents was con­ dredweight lower than the basic formula nated as Class II items. Milk used for cerned, however, only with sterilized price is denied. sour cream and eggnog should remain cream in such containers and therefore The handler proposal to reclassify and Class I milk. consideration is limited to the latter price as Class n milk (at a proposed level Reclassification of milk for pancake product. approximating the present Class II price) mix. Milk for pancake mix processed It was pointed out that at least one only that condensed skim milk or other in a handler’s plant should be reclas­ brand of sterilized cream for whipping is Class III product when it is utilized for sified to Class II since it is not, in its being distributed in the Cincinnati mar­ cottage cheese or ice cream in a pool or disposed form, comparable with the fluid ket. The product referred to is manufac­ nonpool plant serving the Cincinnati uses of milk and skim milk which are tured and packaged in hermetically marketing area would have the effect of the highest valued uses of producer milk. sealed glass containers by a processing pricing Class HI milk sold to nonpool The order presently provides that milk, plant located at Gustine, Calif. The plants not so serving the marketing area skim milk or cream disposed of in bulk product is received and disposed of by at a level approximately 10 cents above to any commercial food processing estab­ handlers in the Greater Cincinnati mar­ the present Class m price level during lishment where food products are pre­ ket in the original container under the the months of March through August. pared only for consumption off the handler’s own label. It was contended that some seasonal re­ premises shall be classified in the lowest A representative of the manufacturer duction in price on such milk is necessary valued manufacturing use classification testified that such sterilized cream may to guarantee that the market surplus (Class i n ) . This classification is pro­ be derived from either Grade A or un­ will be handled in the months of in­ vided so as to permit milk not required graded milk, but is usually made from creased seasonal production. for fluid purposes to be disposed of com­ ungraded milk. The product is distrib­ Although the offered price would be 10 petitively with alternative supplies, such uted to some 49 States and for all but a cents higher than the Class III price now as nonfat dry milk and condensed milk, . few (such as North Carolina and Louisi­ prevailing, it would remain substantially which are available for the processing of ana where specifically required to be below the general level of prices being nondairy food products. made from Grade A and so labeled) it paid for surplus milk in manufactured Under the terms of the present order, may be made from ungraded milk. The uses. If additional quantities of milk bulk skim milk disposed of to a com­ product being distributed in the Cincin­ are allowed to flow to fluid use in accord­ mercial establishment for the manufac­ nati market is manufactured from un­ ance with current market requirements, ture of pancake mix would be clas­ graded milk. the market should have no difficulty in sified as Class III. Although there is This sterilized cream product contains clearing its normal, temporary surpluses no evidence that disposition of milk or 30 percent butterfat and certain stabi­ at the basic formula price. The pro­ skim milk is, in fact, being made by han­ lizers. It is not subject to the pasteuriza­ posal therefore is denied. dlers in the market to commercial proc­ tion and other health standards applica­ lb. Class II and Class III butterfat essors for use in this particular pur­ ble to fresh fluid cream and may not be differentials. Producers also proposed a pose, a surplus classification is permitted labeled as “cream” in this market. It change in the butterfat differential to be when disposed of to bakeries and certain need not be distributed through the usual applicable to butterfat included in Class other food processing establishments. It marketing channels through which fresh II milk and Class III milk as presently was not shown that skim milk and but­ fluid cream is distributed. The product, defined which are combined into a new because of its long keeping qualities, may Class II milk. The butterfat differen­ terfat used in the processing of pancake tial which would be applicable to butter­ mix is required by local health author­ be disposed of directly to grocery store fat in the revised Class II milk category ities to be made from Grade A milk. chains and can be held in warehouses would be the Chicago 92 score butter We see no justification in the record for from which it may be distributed over price times 0.115. The present Class II classifying milk used in processing pan- wide areas.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3129 Under present terms of the order, this butterfat and cheese or nonmilk product ket need. In view of the expressed de­ product is classified as other source milk additives as presently called for in the sire of handlers and producers to im­ in Class I. By excluding the product order be eliminated. prove the utilization and level of blend (when received and disposed of without This proposal should be adopted. The returns to producers in this market, it repackaging) from the “Class I milk” Class II provisions defining the specialty is not apparent how encouragement to and “other source milk” definitions it will products commonly known as sour dips an adequate supply for all uses requiring be accounted for in the plant but will not or dressings should not arbitrarily ex­ producer milk, including sour cream, be subject to pricing under the order. clude such a product solely because the would result from lowering the price of It was not shown on the record that ingredient composition fails to meet the producer milk used in sour cream. In the sterilized cream product has any currently prescribed standards. There this connection, it is noteworthy that competitive advantage based upon the are no distinguishing differences based even the proponent of a lower use value cost of milk ingredients and transporta­ on form or use. for sour cream, sour cream mixtures and tion charges of moving the finished prod­ Although the current definition of eggnog likewise complained of the need uct to this market when compared to Class n actually includes most of such for a higher blend price and, correspond­ the costs of producer milk disposed of in products disposed of in the market, the ingly, the need to direct more of the the form of regular, or unsterlized, possibility remains under present class market’s supply of producer milk to fill cream. The exemption of this product definitions that similar products in­ the bottling needs of the market. The from price regulation therefore is not tended for similar use would be classi­ proposal to classify sour cream as Class expected to affect the orderly marketing fied as Class I. The record did not show n was not supported by producers or by of producer milk in the form of fluid milk that there were any distinguishing other handlers in the market. products in the area. In this connection features involving their use which justify In view of these considerations, the it may be noted that for each of the years a different (Class I) classification of cer­ proposal should not be adopted. 1963 and 1964, the amount of producer tain of such products on the basis of the Proponent handlers requesting the re­ milk in this market sold in the form of amount of butterfat and food additives classification of eggnog testified to com­ “double cream” (cream items containing content. We conclude that logically all petition in the local market with eggnog 27 percent or more butterfat) amounted products of this type should be in a made with vegetable fat and with canned to about one-tenth of 1 percent. single class. eggnog. They stated that they sell fresh Classification of sour cream items, sour Also, the limiting of Class II dips to eggnog in competition with eggnog sold cream and eggnog. Three handlers pro­ “cultured” mixtures should be elimi­ by handlers regulated under the Fort posed that certain sour cream items, sour nated. This is appropriate in light of re­ Wayne, Ind., Louisville-Lexington- cream, and eggnog be removed from the cent technical innovations in the proc­ Evansville, Dayton-Springfield, North­ fluid milk products presently designated essing of such mixtures and also because eastern Ohio, Columbus and Northwest­ as Class I and be classified as Class n of new products on the market which are ern Ohio Federal milk orders. Eggnog is milk. Principal reasons for proposing very similar to those being sold at pres­ classified as Class II in these markets, these changes were sales competition in ent but which are not clearly defined except Columbus and Northwestern Ohio these items with handlers regulated in under the present classification provi­ where such products are classified as other order markets where such products sions of the order. Proponent handlers Class I. are classified and priced at a lower use pointed out that dip specialties may now Producer milk used to produce eggnog value, and growing competition with imi­ be derived from cream coagulated by should continue, however, to be classified tation sour cream products made with organic or inorganic acids rather than as Class I as presently required under the vegetable fat. by the traditional lactic culture. Since order. For example, proponent handlers cited this is a matter of manufacturing tech­ Essentially the same reasons for con­ several brands of sour cream and sour nique and does not materially alter the tinuing sour cream as Class I apply also cream mixtures which are being sold in general form or use of the final product, to eggnog. Although market demand for stores in the Cincinnati area. Of seven the particular manufacturing process this product is seasonal, it is primarily brands of sour cream (real and imitation) used should not be a determining factor designed for the fluid market. Also, milk cited, four are “sour cream” items sold in classification. not approved by local health authorities and distributed by Cincinnati regulated Inasmuch as sour cream should re­ may not be used for eggnog. handlers. The remaining three consist main a Class I product, for reasons to 2. Location Adjustments. The area of a sour cream product from a Chicago be discussed later in these findings, it is within which no location differential is area, an imitation sour cream item from necessary to revise the definition of Class applicable should not be revised at this a Marietta, Ohio, plant and a sour cream n milk to distinguish the classification time. Zone differential rates should item from a New Bremen, Ohio, plant. of sour cream from the classification of remain unchanged. Sour cream dips, either cultured or not sour cream dips and dressings. A handler proposed revision of the cultured, should be included in the re­ The proposal to reclassify sour cream location adjustment provisions in a man­ vised Class II milk category. from Class I to Class II should not be ner that no adjustment to the Class I The order presently provides for the adopted. and blend prices would be made with classification as Class n milk of cultured The skim milk and butterfat used to respect to producer milk received at pool mixtures of skim milk and butterfat to produce sour cream for sale in the Cin­ plants within a radius of 90 miles of Cin­ which cheese or any food substance other cinnati market is required by local health cinnati. At the present time the “no than a milk product has been added in authorities to be made from Grade A differential” area is limited to a radius an amount equal to at least 3 percent of milk. Under the general scheme of of 30 miles from Cincinnati. A corollary the finished product and which contains classified pricing in Federal order mar­ proposal would revise the application of not more than 15 percent butterfat. kets, the level of price for milk and milk zone rates beyond the proposed no dif­ This designation is intended to cover products which require an approved sup­ ferential area. No supporting testimony products commonly referred to as “dip ply is established at a level higher than was given, however, with respect to the specialty products.” These dip specialty than the price level of manufacturing latter proposal. items are semisolid, coagulated cream milk unless there are compelling reasons products and are distributed in the form for a lower classification. This is ap­ The proponent handler’s pool supply of dips, dressings and toppings. Under propriate in order to compensate for the plant maintains manufacturing facilities. present provisions of the order any sim­ extra cost incurred by producers to pro­ This plant is located approximately 88 ilar specialty product which does not duce quality milk and provide sufficient miles from Cincinnati at Covington, meet these percentage requirements, un­ incentive to the producers, through the Ohio. It is subject to a location adjust­ less specifically designated in another blended price returns, to encourage the ment of 14.5 cents under the terms of the classification, would be classified as a production of those quantities of milk present order. Proponent stated that “fluid milk (Class I) product.” needed for all uses requiring inspected application of the location adjustment to Proponent handlers proposed that sour milk. the blended price results in a uniform cream dips, whether cultured or not cul­ The sour cream market is a year- price at the plant well below the uniform tured, be classified as Class n and any round market requiring regularity in the price of the Dayton-Springfield market percentage requirements with respect to supply of producer milk to meet the mar­ (f.o.b. market), making it virtually im- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3130 PROPOSED RULE MAKING possible for the plant to hold its bulk tank respective costs borne by producer and approved Interstate Milk Shippers list milk supply without payment of pre­ handler in moving can milk to the mar­ and the milk has an IMS rating of 90 or miums to producers. ket from the country supply plant. better. Currently, the premiums being paid by 3. Revision of supply-demand adjustor. Principal markets in competition with this handler exceed the 14.5 cents repre­ The maximum amount per hundred­ Cincinnati handlers for both sales and sented by the location adjustment. It is weight by which the supply-demand ad­ Grade A milk supply are Dayton-Spring­ contended that elimination of the adjust­ justor may adjust the Class I prices in field, Louisville-Lexington-Evansville, ment by including the Covington plant both the Cincinnati and the Dayton- jand Columbus. Further, certain Cin­ within the “no differential” area would Springfield markets for any one month cinnati handlers have expanded their remove the problem of supply procure­ should be reduced from 50 cents to 39 sales in recent years to include the Day­ ment and make it possible for the plant cents. ton-Springfield and Columbus markets to hold its producer milk supply. A common supply-demand “adjustor” as well as other nearby Ohio markets The location differential provisions as to Class I prices was adopted for both such as Tri-States, and have indicated proposed should not be adopted on the markets effective December 1, 1964. In also plans for expansion into other addi­ basis of the rather limited consideration the decision of the Assistant Secretary, tional sales areas. These developments, given the matter at this hearing. As issued November 5, 1964, concerning this they say, have created additional needs pointed out in opposition testimony, the matter (29 F.R. 15147), it was determined for fluid milk and further emphasizes proposal made would provide a higher that the Class I sales and producer re­ the need for close alignment of Class I Class I price at Covington than the Day- ceipts of both markets should be com­ and producer blend prices with other ton-Springfield Class I price which bears bined in computing a common supply- Ohio markets. a definite location relationship to the demand adjustment for the two markets The matter of intermarket alignment Cincinnati Class I price. Covington, like and that their respective Class I prices of prices was cited by handlers as an im­ Dayton-Springfield, is north of Cincin­ should be specifically related. It was de­ portant problem. Because of the plus nati but somewhat more distant than termined also that the maximum plus or adjustments to the Cincinnati Class I Dayton-Springfield. Thus, the effect of minus adjustment for any one month price brought about by the action of the the proposal on Class I price relation­ should be set at 56 cents per hundred­ supply-demand adjustor in recent ships would not comport with the cur­ weight. Prior to these amendments to months, it was contended that the Cin­ rently established pattern of prices in the the two orders, the adjustors in the cinnati Class I price reached a level too region. Official notice is taken of the Greater Cincinnati and Dayton-Spring­ high in relation to nearby competing November 5,1964, decision of the Assist­ field orders were limited to 50 cents and markets. In this connection, handlers ant Secretary on amendments to the 38 cents per hundredweight, respectively. stated that their proposed limit on plus Cincinnati order for the basis of such Five handlers proposed to modify the supply-demand adjustments would tend price relationship between the markets. Class I pricing provision of the Greater to increase the incentive to handlers to Moreover, according to exhibits intro­ Cincinnati order by reducing from 50 draw upon sources of milk already under duced by proponent, the prevailing haul­ cents to 20 cents, the maximum amount the order to the greatest possible extent ing rates on bulk tank milk produced on by which the adjustor may adjust the for Class I purposes before adding addi­ farms in several counties for delivery to Greater Cincinnati Class I milk price. tional producer milk. Covington as compared with delivery In light of this proposal, the Department The supply-demand adjustment was from the same counties to Cincinnati placed interested parties on notice that at its highest level in recent years for the do not differ materially. On these data, the intermarket relationship between month of October 1965 (36 cents per adoption of the proposed plan of loca­ Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield Fed­ hundred-weight), 6 cents higher than tion adjustments would tend to encour­ eral order markets, adopted in the No­ the largest adjustment in 1964, which age delivery of bulk tank milk to pro­ vember 5, 1964, decision, could be altered occurred in September. This 36-cent ponent’s supply plant when it could be by the handlers’ proposal. In order that adjustment was based upon the trend delivered directly to Cincinnati at no all aspects of such price alignment might of the markets’ relationship of supply significantly greater cost to the producer be given full consideration the Dayton- to demand indicated by the departure, and be immediately available for higher Springfield order therefore was opened or deviation, of the “mover” (e.g., the valued utilization. for review of the corresponding provision mover for the October pricing month is The order should not encourage receipt in such order. based upon the preceding 3 months of of bulk tank milk at outlying plants At the hearing, proponent handlers June, July, and August) from the pre­ when it is produced within the radius modified their original proposal to apply determined “norm,” or standard utiliza­ from which delivery may be made di­ the same 20-cent limitation to the Day­ tion percentage. The percentage of pro­ rectly from the farm to a city plant with­ ton-Springfield Class I price adjustor. ducer milk classified as Class I averaged out the cost (and charges) involved in A Dayton handler supported the 20-cent (simple) 68 percent for the period of such intermediate handling. Covington is limitation for the two orders and also mover (June, July, and August) 1965, or within such a distance from Cincinnati. proposed that there be a limit of 4 cents about 6 percentage points higher than When the milk is delivered directly to change in any adjustment one month to for the same period in 1964. This indi­ Cincinnati the location differential is the next. Another Cincinnati handler cation of a shorter supply relationship automatically eliminated, of course, since proposed a 24-cent limit (plus or minus) to sales for the pricing month of October the milk then is eligible for pricing f.o.b. to the supply-demand adjustment, like­ resulted in the 36-cent supply-demand market. Also, as pointed out previously wise to apply to both markets. adjustment. in this decision, the market needs in­ Cincinnati handlers cited as their prin­ In the November 1964 decision sup­ creased supplies for expanding fluid re­ cipal reason for proposing the reduced porting the adoption of this formula it quirements and only that milk available limit on the supply-demand adjustment, was pointed out that in reestablishing of as part of the incidental, but necessary, the recent increase in competition with standard utilization percentages (reflect­ reserve should be held for processing into handlers in certain other nearby markets ing the “normal” monthly supply- nonfluid products. for both milk supplies and sales. This demand relationship of the two markets As to can milk, it is obvious that there competition for milk sales and supply in combination) some modification was would be signficantly greater cost in­ has come about, in part, from the de­ made for the purpose of lessening the volved in the delivery of such milk di­ velopment of modem highways and ex­ possibility of contraseasonal supply- rectly from farms to Cincinnati than to pressways and the availability of im­ demand adjustments which might occur this country supply plant. Proponent proved transportation and refrigeration as a result of random seasonal shifting did not show that the present location facilities and equipment. in the relationship of production and differential no longer reasonably relates Graded milk from markets under Class I disposition in the two markets, the value of can milk at the country lo­ health jurisdictions other than that of one year to the next. As a consequence, cation and its value at the city processing Cincinnati market also may now move it could be expected that, all things being plant. Thus, it must be presumed that more freely into the Cincinnati market, equal, monthly price adjustments would the differential continues to reflect the if the shippers of such milk are on the be somewhat more sensitive to a trend

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3131

toward a shortening of supply during the A mount by Which Cincinnati Order Class I P rice A maximum limit of plus 39 cents is on the Average E xceeded Class I P rices in the low production months than would be the F ollowing Markets 3 cents higher than the highest level of case if such a trend were indicated during supply-demand adjustment reached dur­ the generally flush production months of ing 1965. This limit is expected to en­ the year. First 10 months of— courage the maximum use of producer At least a portion of this advance in milk in Class I during the rapid adjust­ the fall as compared to a year ago may 1963 1964 1965 ment in supplies and sales. be attributed, however, to the slight Provision should also be made that any Cent» Cents Cents modification of the norms. To an equal D ayton-Springñeld______26 23 10 negative supply-demand adjustment to extent, an offsetting contraseasonal Columbus______48 »36 1 9 Class I price shall not exceed 39 cents effect might be expected in the coming Indianapolis______35 29 25 Fort Wayne______43 36 32 per hundredweight. The ceiling of plus spring months of generally flush produc­ Louisville-Lexington-Evans- 39 cents and a corresponding floor of tion since an offsetting adjustment was ville______15 7 5 minus 39 cents adjustment will provide made in the norms which determine assurance that a close Class I price align­ flush period price levels. 1 Including the 14 cents added to Class I differential ment will be maintained between the As stated previously, handlers directed by amendment of May 1, 1964. Dayton-Springfield and Columbus mar­ their objections to the amount by which kets, which compete both in sales and the current supply-demand formula has A similar comparison with the more distant market of Chicago also shows procurement. The Columbus order pro­ contributed to an escalation of the Cin­ vides a limit of 38 Gents plus or minus. cinnati Class I price and resulting mis­ the same trend. The Cincinnati Class I price exceeded the Chicago 70-mile zone The appropriateness of a similar align­ alignment with other markets. Never­ ment between Cincinnati and Dayton- theless, for the 10-month period of Jan­ price on the average by 99, 92, and 86 cents per hundredweight, respectively, Springfield is evident by the close com­ uary through October 1965, the current petition for sales and supply by Dayton supply-demand formula resulted in plus for the comparable 10-month periods during 1963, 1964, and 1965. and Cincinnati handlers. It is noted adjustments to the Class I price averag­ further that handlers regulated under ing two cents lower than during the same In light of the above we may not rea­ the Tri-State order have common sales period 1964. While the Class I price sonably conclude that the current sup­ areas with handlers in the Cincinnati, averaged $4.78 during the 1965 period as ply-demand formula has adversely af­ Dayton-Springfield,-and Columbus mar­ compared to $4.71 for the same period fected the orderly marketing of fluid kets as found in a decision of the As­ 1964, the 7-cent average increase in the milk. The proposals for a 20-cent or 24- sistant Secretary issued April 23, 1965 Class I price in 1965 may be accounted / cent limit are therefore denied. For the (30 F.R. 5904), official notice of which is for by a 9-cent average increase in the same reasons, a counter proposal made by producers to apply both a ceiling and taken herewith, concerning amendments basic formula price offset by the 2-cent to the Tri-State order. The order for average decrease in the supply-demand floor on the supply-demand adjustment should not be adopted. The latter pro­ this market also has a limit of 38 cents adjustment. This increase in the Cin­ plus or minus on its supply-demand cinnati basic formula price is similar to posal would have the effect of fixing at a adjustor. that reflected in several other Federal single level of plus 22 cents the amount Although not presenting a formal pro­ order markets where the basic price the adjustor could affect price in any month. The supply-demand formula is posal one Cincinnati handler testified in formulas are similar. They reflect support of a similar level of Class I prices competitive conditions in the manufac­ designed as a supplement to other price determinants as a means of bringing for all fluid markets within a 300-mile turing segment of the industry rather radius of Cincinnati. Since orders for than intermarket competition in fluid about timely responses in price to milk. changes in the market in the relationship markets other than Cincinnati and Day­ between receipts of milk from producers ton-Springfield were not under consider­ The Cincinnati Class X price has, in ation at this hearing, the testimony may fact, increased less in recent years than and Class I sales. In the present dy­ namic market situation, more flexibility not appropriately be considered. As to Class I prices in other nearby markets. the relationship of prices between Cin­ The Cincinnati price averaged $4.73 per in pricing is needed than would be pro­ vided by the producers’ proposal. cinnati and Dayton-Springfield, this hundredweight for 1963 and remained matter is discussed elsewhere in this at that average level in 1964. For the That the two markets are in a period decision. Dayton, Columbus, Indianapolis, Fort of supply and sales transition there can be little doubt. A large milk and ice A Dayton handler proposed to estab­ Wayne, and Louisville markets the 1964 lish a 4-cent “dampener” on the month- Class I prices averaged 5, 13, 6, 7, and 8 cream plant was established in the Cin­ cents higher, respectively, over those of cinnati market during 1964 to process to-month changes in supply-demand ad­ milk to be distributed in several market justments as a corollary change to a pro­ the preceding year. posal by certain other handlers to provide Also, over a 2-year period there has areas. This and other market changes relating to the movement of milk for a 20-cent limit to the supply-demand been a trend toward a closer alignment of adjustment (discussed elsewhere in these Class I prices between the Cincinnati through channels from farm to con­ findings). market and the five other markets cited. sumer, brought about in part by improved A comparison of Class I prices for the roads and transportation systems, im­ It was the contention of this handler 10-month period January through Oc­ proved technological developments in that: (1) The supply-demand formula tober 1965 with the same period for 1963 milk storage and processing, expansion presently used in the two orders is obso­ shows the Cincinnati Class I price to of plant facilities to effect economies of lete; and (2) there is no justification for have increased on the average only 6 scale make it evident that the marketing a plus supply-demand adjustment for the cents per hundredweight, whereas the of fluid milk and milk products in the Cincinnati market based upon the cur­ five neighboring markets increased as two-market area is going through a pe­ rent relationship of Class I to producer follows: riod of rapid change. milk. This handler, however, offered no Cents It is desirable, therefore, that the limit proposal to change other factor com­ Dayton-Springfield______22 (both maximum and minimum) on the ponents of the supply-demand formula. C olum b us______13i supply-demand adjustment be set at a It was not shown on the record how Indianapolis ______16 level less than the 50-cent per hundred­ the 4-cent “dampener” might improve Port Wayne______- 17 weight now provided, and more nearly the effectiveness of the supply-demand Louisville-Lexington-Evansville_____ 16 in line with prevailing limits provided formula. Further, the appropriateness 1 Not including 14 cents added to Class I for in other nearby order markets. of the use of the 4-cent figure, in lieu of differential by amendment of May 1,1964. A limit of 39 cents per hundredweight some other amount was not made clear. The general trend toward a closer is deemed to be appropriate in view of The current formula is designed to ad­ alignment of the Cincinnati Class I price the circumstances herein discussed just Class I prices in multiples of three with prices in the nearby markets is fur­ cents. which indicate a growing interplay of The proponent handler cited as one ther demonstrated by the following competition for Class I sales between reason for the 4-cent dampener, its use table: these markets and other Ohio markets. in a number of other orders. It was not

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No. 38------4 3132 PROPOSED RULE MAKING shown, however, whether the conditions Since widely fluctuating changes in Among the items included under the which justified such a device in the Class the supply-demand adjustments are not “other source milk” definition of the I pricing formula of another order also evidenced by these data and no evidence Greater Cincinnati order are plant re­ prevail in the Cincinnati and Dayton was introduced to show how the pro­ ceipts, from any source, of manufactured markets. The proposal was not sup­ posed dampener would improve the dairy products, principally Class III, ported by other handlers or producers formula, the proposal is denied. which are reprocessed, repackaged or in either market. 4. Incidental and conforming changes. converted to another product during the Such a device is employed in the sup- There are no incidental or conforming month. This provision in the various ply-demand formulas of some orders changes necessary to the Dayton-Spring­ orders is designed generally to require principally as a means of minimizing the field order provisions. Certain corollary handlers to keep records and to account possibility of marked variations in Class changes in the Greater Cincinnati order, for the nonfluid products from other I prices which otherwise might occur however, are appropriate. sources under the circumstances de­ from unusual short-run conditions in the a. The transportation allowance from scribed so that to the extent that they relationship of supply to demand. the pool provided by the Cincinnati order are converted in the handler’s plant to a Several components of the current on certain condensed milk and frozen higher valued use, the increment of in­ supply-demand formula for the two mar­ cream should be eliminated. creased value will be reflected in the total kets, however, are designed to act as a The present order allows a transpor­ value of all producer milk in the pool. “dampener” to such short term abnor­ tation adjustment on the actual weight Without such a requirement, for ex­ mal conditions and thus provide reason­ of condensed milk or frozen cream when ample, a handler by failing to keep rec­ able stability in adjustments to Class I moved from a pool supply plant to a ords of the nonfat dry milk and similar prices. One such component is the pro­ fluid milk (pool) plant where it is proc­ products which can.be reconstituted into vision for a bracket of 3 percentage essed into a Class n product such as ice skim milk or other fluid milk products points in the standard utilization per­ cream. Thus, pool handlers purchasing would gain a competitive advantage over centage (norm) for each month. This condensed milk or frozen cream from a other handlers in the market. bracketing, together with provisions for pool supply 'plant are allowed "the ad­ The Cincinnati order provision is sim­ “rounding” the computed utilization per­ justment on the amount used in Class n ilar to that provided for in many other centage, provides a “corridor” of 4 per­ while an unregulated competitor in the orders but differs somewhat in that it centage points within which the cur­ market making a similar product does specifically excludes those nonfluid dairy rent utilization percentage may move not receive the allowance even though products received from other pool plants without effecting a price adjustment. the source of his condensed milk or which currently are designated under the frozen cream may be the same pool sup­ order as Class n products (principally Stability in adjustments also is ice cream, ice cream mix and cottage achieved, to some extent, by the provi­ ply plant. cheese) rather than Class III milk prod­ sion in the formula for a 3-month The new Class II price is applicable to ucts. This exclusionary provision no “mover” rather than a 2-month mover condensed milk, frozen cream, cottage longer appears necessary under present as in some other markets. That is, the cheese, ice cream and other nonfluid accounting procedures. use of utilization and receipts in the milk products whether sold in the market c. Provisions which were pertinent to two markets for the 3 preceding months or outside. The level of such price is in “Class III” are modified or revised in in calculating the current Class I utili­ line with the general level of manufac­ the Cincinnati order by deleting lan­ zation percentage tends to smooth out turing milk prices even though the Cin­ guage no longer applicable. Also, the the adjustments, one month to the next. cinnati market does have restriction on numerous references to “Class III” are A further dampening influence is ef­ sources of ingredients for ice cream and either deleted or changed to “Class II.” fected from the slight modification re­ cottage cheese in that the ingredients d. Other changes in Cincinnati order cently made in the “norms” to offset must be derived from Grade A milk. provisions not specifically discussed are contraseasonal price effects, as discussed The processor in the Cincinnati mar­ merely conforming changes necessary to earlier. ket, whether regulated or unregulated, implement the conclusions previously set The effectiveness of these devices as a relying on outside, or nonproducer, fourth herein. means of stabilizing adjustments is evi­ sources of milk for his ice cream or cot­ Rulings on proposed findings and con­ denced by the history of adjustments tage cheese ingredients is allowed clusions. Briefs and proposed findings since the inception of the formula in nothing from the pool for the transporta­ and conclusions were filed on behalf of the two orders effective December 1964. tion of such ingredients to the market. certain interested parties. These briefs, Except for 1 month (March 1965) Payment for transportation, as well as proposed findings and conclusions and when the amount of “change” in adjust­ price, is a matter of private arrangement the evidence in the record were con­ ment (one month to the next) was 9 between buyer and seller. Similarly, sidered in making the findings and con­ cents, such change has ranged from 3 to since producer milk for condensed milk clusions set forth above. To the extent 6 cents, averaging 4.75 cents on a and frozen cream as well as other non­ that the suggested findings and conclu­ monthly basis during the period Decem­ fluid products is priced at the manufac­ sions filed by interested parties are in­ ber 1964 through December 1965. turing level, it should not be subject to consistent with the findings and conclu­ During this 13-month period, the special consideration as to transporta­ sions set forth herein, the requests to month-to-month change in supply- tion simply because it is producer milk. make such findings or reach such con­ demand adjustments only twice reversed Purchasers of condensed milk and clusions are denied for the reasons pre­ direction, once in April and again in frozen cream in the Cincinnati mar­ viously stated in this decision. November 1965. To illustrate, the ket therefore will be on equal footing General findings. The findings and supply-demand adjustment trended with respect to transportation cost on determinations hereinafter set forth are downward from a plus 24 cents in De­ such products. The pool supply plant supplementary and in addition to the cember 1964 to a plus 6 cents for March making such indgredients at least has findings and determinations previously 1965. An upward trend in the adjust­ the natural advantage of proximity to made in connection with the issuance of ment began in April 1965 (plus 9 cents) the Cincinnati market. Consequently, the aforesaid orders and of the previously and continued to increase thereafter (in neither it nor the pool processor of such issued amendments thereto; and all of plus increments of change each month products should be disadvantaged by said previous findings and determina­ amounting to 3 or 6 cents) to an October this change in competing with outside tions are hereby ratified and affirmed, 1965 high of plus 36 cents. November sources for those ice cream and cottage except insofar as such findings and de­ 1965 again marked the beginning of a cheese outlets within the local market terminations may be in conflict with the trend downward from a plus 33 cents to which at present are benefited by the findings and determinations set forth plus 27 cents for December 1965, with the transportation adjustment. herein. addition of significant amounts of new b. A slight modification to the “other source milk” definition is appropriate in (a) The tentative marketing agree­ supplies of producer milk to the market. ments and the orders, as hereby proposed (Official notice is taken of the Greater view of the proposed consolidation of Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield mar­ the two manufacturing classifications of - to be amended, and all of the terms and ket administrator’s announcements of milk (Class n and Class HE) into the conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate Class I price for December 1965.) the new Class n classification. the declared policy of the Act;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3133 (b) The parity prices of milk as de­ for sale within the respective aforesaid amended and as hereby amended, as fol­ termined pursuant to section 2 of the Act marketing areas. lows: are not reasonable in view of the price The provisions of the proposed mar­ of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and Signed at Washington, D.C., on Feb­ ruary 21,1966. keting agreement and order amending other economic conditions which affect the order contained in the recommended market supply and demand for milk in G eorge L. M ehren, Assistant Secretary. decision issued by the Deputy Adminis­ the marketing areas, and the minimum trator, on February 1, 1966, and pub­ prices specified in the proposed market­ Order1 Amending the Order Regulating lished in the F ederal R egister on Febru­ ing agreements and the orders, as hereby the Handling of Milk in the Greater ary 4, 1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. Doc. 66- proposed to be amended, are such prices Cincinnati Marketing Area 1252), shall be and are the terms and as will reflect the aforesaid factors, in­ § 1033.0 Findings and determinations. provisions of this order, and are set forth sure a sufficient quantity of pure and in full herein subject to a revision of wholesome milk, and be in the public in­ The findings and determinations here­ § 1033.51(b). terest; and inafter sét forth are supplementary and 1. Section 1033.14 is revised to read as (c) The tentative marketing agree­ in addition to the findings and determi­ follows: ments and the orders, as hereby proposed nations previously made in connection to be amended, will regulate the han­ with the issuance of the aforesaid order § 1033.14 Other source milk. dling of milk in the same manner as, and of the previously issued amendments “Other source milk” means all skim and will be applicable only to persons in thereto; and all of said previous findings milk and butterfat contained in or rep­ the respective classes of industrial and and determinations are hereby ratified resented by : commercial activity specified in, market­ and affirmed, except insofar as such find­ (a) Receipts during the month in the ing agreements upon which hearings ings and determinations may be in con­ form of fluid milk products, except: have been held. flict with the findings and determina­ (1) Fluid milk products received from Rulings on exceptions. In arriving at tions set forth herein. other pool plants ; the findings and conclusions, and the (a) Findings upon the basis of the (2) Sterilized cream received and dis­ regulatory provisions of this decision, hearing record. Pursuant to the pro­ posed of in the same glass or metal her­ each of the exceptions received was care­ visions of the Agricultural Marketing metically sealed container; fully and fully considered in conjunction Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 (3) Inventory of fluid milk products with the record evidence pertaining U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable at the beginning of the month; and thereto. To the extent that the findings rules of practice and procedure govern­ ( 4 ) Producer milk ; and and conclusions, and the regulatory pro­ ing the formulation of marketing agree­ (b) Products other than fluid milk visions of this decision are at variance ments and marketing orders (7 CFR Part products from any source (including with any of the exceptions, such excep­ 900), a public hearing was held upon those produced at the pool plant) that tions are hereby overruled for the reasons certain proposed amendments to the ten­ are reprocessed, repackaged, or converted previously stated in this decision. tative marketing agreement and to the to another product during the month or Marketing agreements and orders. order regulating the handling of milk in for which other utilization or disposition Annexed hereto and made a part hereof the Greater Cincinnati marketing area. is not established pursuant to § 1033.33. are four documents entitled respectively, Upon the basis of the evidence introduced “Marketing Agreement Regulating the at such hearing and the record thereof, 2. Section 1033.15 is revised to read as Handling of Milk in the Greater Cincin­ it is found that: follows : nati Marketing Area,” and “Order (1) The said order as hereby amend­ § 1033.15 Fluid milk product. Amending the Order Regulating the ed, and all of the terms and conditions Handling of Milk in the Greater Cincin­ thereof, will tend to effectuate the de­ “Fluid milk product” means the fluid nati Marketing Area”; “Marketing clared policy of the Act; form of : Agreement Regulating the Handling of (2) The parity prices of milk, as de­ (a) Milk, skim milk, buttermilk, fla­ Milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, termined pursuant to section 2 of the Act, vored milk, milk drink, eggnog, concen­ Marketing Area” and “Order Amending , are not reasonable in view of the price trated milk, whipped cream, cream the Order Regulating the Handling of of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and (sweet or sour) ; and Milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, other economic conditions which affect (b) Any mixture of milk, skim milk Marketing Area” which have been de­ market supply and demand for milk in or cream including fluid, frozen or semi- cided upon as the detailed and appro­ the said marketing area, and the mini­ frozen malted milk and milk shake mix­ priate means of effectuating the fore­ mum prices specified in the order as tures containing less than 15 percent going conclusions. hereby amended, are such prices as will tdtal milk solids. It is hereby ordered, That all of this reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a suf­ (c) Excluded from this definition are: decision, except the attached marketing ficient quantity of pure and wholesome Frozen storage cream, aerated cream in agreements, be published in the F ederal milk, and be in the public interest; dispensers, ice cream and frozen des­ R egister. The regulatory provisions of (3) The said order as hereby amend­ sert mixes, pancake mix, evaporated and said marketing agreements are identical ed, regualtes the handling of milk in the condensed milk, and any sour mixture of with those contained in the orders as same manner as, and is applicable only skim milk and butterfat in nonfluid form hereby proposed to be amended by the to persons in the respective classes of in­ to which cheese or any food substance attached orders which will be published dustrial or commercial activity specified other than a milk product has been added with this decision. in, a marketing agreement upon which and which is disposed of as other than Determination of representative pe­ a hearing has been held. sour cream. riod. The month of December 1965 is ORDER RELATIVE TO HANDLING 3. Section 1033.41 is revised to read hereby determined to be the represent­ as follows: ative period for the purpose of ascer­ It is therefore ordered, That on and taining whether the issuance of the at­ after the effective date hereof, the han­ § 1033.41 Classes of utilization. tached orders, as amended and as hereby dling of milk in the Greater Cincinnati proposed ter be amended, regulating the marketing area shall be in conformity Subject to the conditions set forth in handling of milk in the Greater Cincin­ to and in compliance with the terms and §§ 1033.43 and 1033.44, the classes of nati marketing area and the Dayton- conditions of the aforesaid order, as utilization shall be as follows: Springfield, Ohio, marketing area, re­ (a) Class I milk. Class I milk shall be spectively, are approved or favored by all skim milk and butterfat: producers, as defined under the terms of 1 This order shall not become effective un­ (1) Disposed of in the form of a fluid the respective orders, as amended and as less and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure govern­ milk product except: hereby proposed to be amended, and ing proceedings to formulate marketing (i) Fluid milk products classified as who, during such representative period, agreements and marketing orders have been Class II pursuant to paragraph (b) (2), were engaged in the production of milk met. (3), and (4) of this section;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3134^ PROPOSED RULE MAKING

(ii) Sterilized cream disposed of in § 1033.45 [Amended] such price exceed an amount computed the same glass or metal hermetically 8. In § 1033.45, the phrase immediately from the sum of subparagraphs (1) and sealed container in which received ; preceding the proviso “Class I milk, Class (2) of this paragraph rounded to the (iii) Fluid milk products which are II milk, and Class HE milk for such han­ nearest cent, plus 10 cents: fortified with the addition of milk solids dler” is changed to read “Class I milk (1) From the Chicago butter price, shall be Class I in an amount equal only and Class II milk for such handler”. subtract 3.0 cents, add 20 percent of the to the weight of an equal volume of an resulting amount and then multiply 3.5; unmodified fluid milk product of the § 1033.46 [Amended] and same nature and butterf at content. 9. In § 1033.46, the following changes (2) From the weighted average of car- (2) Not accounted for as Class II milk; are made: lot prices per pound of spray process (b) Class II milk. Class II milk shall A. In paragraph (a)(1), the words nonfat dry milk for human consumption, be all skim milk and butterf at: “Class III”, where they appear in two f.o.b. Chicago area manufacturing (1) Used to produce: places, are changed to “Class »II”, and plants, as published for the month by the (1) Ice cream, frozen desserts, frozen the reference “§ 1033.41(c) (5) ” is U.S. Department of Agriculture, subtract cream, cheese, butter, and pancake mix; changed to “§ 1033.41(b)(6)”. 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5 and then mul­ (ii) Ice cream and frozen dessert B. In paragraph (a)(2)(i) , the words tiply by 0.965. mixes, excluding malted milk or milk “Class III” are changed to “Class n ”. § 1033.52 [Amended] shake mixtures containing less than 15 C. In the introductory text of para­ percent total milk solids; graph (a)(3), the phrase “the lowest- 11. In § 1033.52, paragraph (c) is re­ (iii) Milk or skipi milk and cream mix­ priced use available” is deleted and the voked and paragraph (b) is revised to tures disposed of in containers or dis­ words “Class II” are substituted thereof. read: “Class II milk. Multiply the Chi­ pensers under pressure for the purpose D. In paragraph (a) (4), the text cago butter price for the month by 0.115.” of dispensing a whipped or aerated prod­ which reads as follows is deleted: “or § 1033.53 [Amended] uct; Class m , according to the classification (iv) Any sour mixture of skim milk claimed by the handler; except that skim 12. Section 1033.53 is amended as fol­ and butterfat in nonfluid form to which milk allocated pursuant to subparagraph lows: cheese or any food substance other than (4) (ii) of this paragraph shall be sub­ A. In paragraph (a)(1), the phrase a milk product has been added and which tracted as specified in that subpara­ “or as condensed skim milk or frozen is disposed of as other than sour cream; graph”. cream” is deleted. (v) Spray and roller process nonfat E. In paragraph (a)(4) (i), the words B. In paragraph (a) (2), the words, “or dry milk solids; “or Class m ,” where they appear in two Class II”, where they appear in two (vi) Evaporated and condensed milk places, are deleted. places, are deleted. (or skim milk) either in bulk or in F. In the introductory text of para­ C. In paragraph (b), the phrase “and hermetically sealed cans; and graph (a) (4) (ii), the text enclosed in Class II milk” is deleted. (2) Skim milk contained in that por­ parenthesis is deleted. § 1033.60 [Amended] tion of fortified fluid milk products not G. In paragraph (a) (4) (ii) (c) (2), the 13. In § 1033.60, paragraph (d) is re­ classified as Class I milk pursuant to first sentence is revised to read “Should paragraph (a) (1) (iii) of this section; vised by deleting the words “Class III" such computation result in a quantity to and substituting the words “Class II” (3) Disposed of in bulk as milk, skim be subtracted from Class n which is in milk or cream to any commercial food thereof, and by deleting the parentheti­ excess of the pounds of skim milk re­ cal phrase “for other than butter”. processing establishment where food maining in Class H, the pounds of skim products are prepared only for consump­ milk in Class II shall be increased to § 1033.61 [Amended] tion off the premises; the quantity to be subtracted and the 14. In § 1033.61, paragraph (a)(l)(i) (4) Specifically, accounted for as pounds of skim milk in Class I shall be is revised by deleting the words “Class dumped, spilled or disposed of for animal decreased a like amount.” III” and substituting “Class II” thereof; feed; H. In paragraph (a) (4) (iii), the 15. In § 1033.61, paragraph (b) (4) is (5) Contained in inventories of fluid phrase “and Class i n milk” and the revised by deleting the phrase “or the milk products; phrase “or Class HI” are deleted. Class III price (for other than butter), (6) In shrinkage of skim milk and but­ I. In paragraph (a) (6), the words whichever is higher” and substituting terfat, respectively, assigned pursuant to “Class i n ” are changed to “Class H”. the parenthetical phrase “(not to be less § 1033.42(b) (1), but not in excess of 2 J. In the introductory text of para­ than the Class II price)”. percent of such milk; and graph (a) (8) (i), the phrase “of all Class (7) In shrinkage of skim milk and but­ n milk and Class m milk” is changed § 1033.72 [Amended] terfat, respectively, assigned pursuant to to read “of all Class II milk”. 16. In § 1033.72, paragraph (b) is re­ § 1033.42(b) (2). K. In paragraph (a) (8) (ii), the words vised by deleting the words “Class III” § 1033.42 [Amended] “and Class i n ”, where they appear in and substituting “Class I i” thereof, and two places, are deleted. by deleting the phrase “for other than 4. In § 1033.42(b), the words “or Class L. In paragraph (a) (10), the word butter.” i n ”, where they appear in two places, are “all” is deleted and the word “both” is deleted. substituted thereof; also the phrase “the Order1 Amending the Order Regulating lowest-priced use available” is deleted the Handling of Milk in the Dayton- § 1033.43 [Amended] Springfield, Ohio, Marketing Area and the words “Class n ” are substituted 4P 5. In § 1033.43, paragraph (c) (3) (iv) is thereof. revised by deleting the proviso and by § 1034.0 Findings and determinations. certain other changes so that paragraph § 1033.51 [Amended] The findings and determinations here­ (c) (3) (iv) now reads “To the extent that 10. Section 1033.51 is revised as fol­ inafter set forth are supplementary and Class I utilization is not so assigned to it, lows: in addition to the findings and determi­ the skim milk and butterfat so trans­ A. In the introductory text of para­ nations previously made in connection ferred shall be classified as Class II milk graph (a), the figure “50” is changed to with the issuance of the aforesaid order and;” and of the previously issued amendments 6. In § 1033.43(d) (3), the words “or “39”. Class m ”, where they appear in two B. Paragraph (c) is revoked and the places, are deleted. text of paragraph (b) is revised to read 1 This order shall not become effective un­ as follows: less and until the requirements of § 900.14 7. In § 1033.43(d) (5), the phrase “or of the rules of practice and procedure gov­ Class III, whichever is more nearly simi­ (b) Class II milk. The Class II milk erning proceedings to formulate marketing lar to the class to which allocated in the price shall be the basic formula price for agreements and marketing orders have been other order” is deleted. the month except that in no event shall met.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3135 thereto; and all of said previous findings the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient and determinations are hereby ratified quantity of pure and wholesome milk, and affirmed, except insofar as such find­ and be in the public interest; ings and determinations may be in con­ (3) The said order as hereby amended, flict with the findings and determina­ regulates the handling of milk in the tions set forth herein. same manner as, and is applicable only (a) Findings upon the basis of the to persons in the respective classes of hearing record. Pursuant to the provi­ industrial or commercial activity speci­ sions of the Agricultural Marketing fied in, a marketing agreement upon Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 which a hearing has been held. U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure govern­ ORDER RELATIVE TO HANDLING ing the formulation of marketing agree­ It is therefore ordered, That on and ments and marketing orders (7 CFR Part after the effective date hereof, the han­ 900), a public hearing was held upon cer­ dling of milk in the Dayton-Springfield, tain proposed amendments to the tenta­ Ohio, marketing area shall be in con­ tive marketing agreement and to the or­ formity to and in compliance with the der regulating the handling of milk in the terms and conditions of the aforesaid Dayton-Springfield, O hio, marketing order, as amended and as hereby area. Upon the basis of the evidence in­ amended, as follows: troduced at such hearing and the record The provisions of the proposed market­ thereof, it is found that: ing agreement and order amending the (1) The said order as hereby amended, order contained in the recommended de­ and all of the terms and conditions cision issued by the Deputy Adminis­ thereof, will tend to effectuate the de­ trator, on February 1,1966, and published clared policy of the Act: in the F ederal R egister on February 4, (2) The parity prices of milk, as deter­ 1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. Doc. 66-1252), mined pursuant to. section 2 of the Act, shall be and are the terms and provisions are not reasonable in view of the price of of this order, and are set forth in full feeds, available supplies of feeds, and herein: other economic conditions which affect § 1034.51 [Amended] market supply and demand for milk in 1. In § 1034.51, paragraph (a) is re­ the said marketing area, and the mini­ vised by changing the figure “50” to “39”. mum prices specified in the order as here­ [F.R. Doc. 66-2018; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; by amended, are such prices as will reflect 8 :4 9 a.m .]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3136 Notices

forth all facts relevant to their claims. 4. Persons claiming preference rights DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Detailed rules and regulations governing based upon valid settlement, statutory Bureau of Land Management applications, which may be filed pursuant preference or equitable claims must en­ to this notice can be foundin Title 43 of close properly corroborated statements in NEVADA the Code of Federal Regulations. support of their applications, setting Inquiries concerning these lands shall forth all facts relevant to their claims. Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey and be addressed to the Manager, Land Office, Detailed rules and regulations governing Order Providing for Opening of Bureau of Land Management, Post Office applications which may be filed pursuant Lands Box 1551, Reno, Nev. to this notice can be found in Title 43 F ebruary 17, 1966. of the Code of Federal Regulations. A. J oh n H illsamer, 1. The plat of survey of lands de­ Acting Manager, 5. Applications for these lands, which scribed below will be officially filed at Nevada Land Office. shall be filed in the Land Office at An­ the Nevada Land Office, Reno, Nev., ef­ chorage, Alaska, shall be acted upon in fective 10 a.m., on March 28, 1966. [P.R. Doc. 66-1973; Piled, Feb. 24, 1966; accordance with the regulations con­ 8:47 a.m.] tained in § 1821.2-3 of Title 43 of the Mount D iablo Meridian Code of Federal Regulations to the ex­ T. 8 N., R. 41 E. (Group 412). tent such regulations are applicable. T. 8 N., R. 42 E. (Group 412). ALASKA Applications under the homestead and 2. The resurveyed and surveyed area Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey homesite laws shall be governed by the regulations contained in §§ 2233.9-1 (a), described above aggregates 5,059.91 F ebruary 16, 1966. acres. The plat was accepted Septem­ 2211.9-1 (a), and 2211.0-6

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRipAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3137

IDAHO place in my financial interests during the duction Act of 1950, as amended, and past 6 months: Executive Order 10647 of November 28, Special Rules for Grazing Districts (1) No change. 1955, the following changes have taken Pursuant to the provisions of 43 CFR (2) No change. place in my financial interests during the 4115.2- 4, the following special rule is (3) No change. past 6 months: adopted for the Dry Creek Allotment, (4) No change. (1) No change. Shoshone, Idaho, District No. 5. Such This statement is made as of Feb­ (2) No change. rule will permit the attachment of graz­ ruary 8, 1966. (3) No change. ing privileges to the Dry Creek Associa­ (4) No change. Dated: February 8, 1966. tion lands in accordance with 43 CFR This statement is made as of Febru­ 4115.2- 2 and satisfy the base property re­ Clyde M . E ppard. ary 7,1966. quirements under 4111.2.1. [F.R. Doc. 66-1975; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Dated: February 7,1966. The Dry Creek Grazing Association 8:45 a.m.] holding grazing privileges in the Dry J. L. M cN ealey. Creek Allotment of the Bureau of Land [F.R. Doc. 66-1978; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Management, Shoshone, Idaho, District GLENN J. HALL No. 5, may use the forage production of 8:45 a.m.] its individual members’ base property in Statement of Changes in Financial excess of that pledged in support of priv­ Interests CHARLES S. McNEER ileges on individual base properties to In accordance with the requirements of satisfy the minimum base property re­ section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ Statement of Changes in Financial quirement not possessed on Association duction Act of 1950, as amended, and Interests owned or controlled land. Executive Order 10647 of November 28, In accordance with the requirements The Association members shall provide 1955, the following changes have taken the District Manager with evidence that of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ place in my financial interests during duction Act of 1950, as amended, and there is excess forage production on their the past 6 months : privately owned or controlled property. Executive Order 1064T of November 28, The excess, together with the members’ (1) None. 1955, the following changes have taken share of the forage production on the (2) FMC Corp., Howe Metals Corp., Mor- place in my financial interests during the rison-Knudsen Co., General Electric Co., past 6 months: Association owned or controlled lands Amalgamated Sugar Co., Idaho Power Có., shall be committed in support of and First Security Bank Corp., Union Carbide (1) No change. adequate to meet the minimum base Corp., West Coast Airlines, Pacific Power & (2) No change. property requirement of Association Light Co., Utah Power & Light Co., Portland (3) No change. grazing privileges. All Association graz­ General Electric Co., Washington Water (4) No change. ing privileges will remain attached to As­ Power Co., Montana Power Co., Westinghouse Electric Co. This statement is made as of Febru­ sociation owned or controlled lands. (3) None. ary 8,1966. Charles H. S toddard, . (4) None. Dated : February 8,1966. Director. This statement is made as of Febru­ C. S. M c N e e r . F ebruary 18,1966. ary 9,1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-1979; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-1972; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Dated: February 9,1966. 8:46 am .] 8:47 am .] G lenn J. H all. IF.R. Doc. 66-1976; Filed Feb. 24, 1966; JULIO A. NEGRONI Office of the Secretary 8:45 am .] HUBBELL CARPENTER Statement of Changes in Financial Interests Statement of Changes in Financial LEWIS W. LENGNICK Interests Statement of Changes in Financial In accordance with the requirements of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ In accordance with the requirements Interests duction Act of 1950, as amended, and of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense In accordance with the requirements Executive Order 10647 of November 28, Production Act of 1950, as amended, and of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ 1955, the following changes have taken Executive Order 10647 of November 28, duction Act of 1950, as amended, and Ex­ place in my financial interests during the 1955, the following changes have taken ecutive Order 10647 of November 28,1955, past 6 months: place in my financial interests during the past 6 months: the following changes have taken place (1) No change. in my financial interests during the past (2) No change. (1) No change. 6 months: (.3) No change. (2) No change. (4) No change. (3) No change. (1) No change. (4) No change. (2) Sold American Photocopy. This statement is made as of Febru­ (3) No change. ary 1966;- This statement is made as of Feb­ (4) No change. Dated: February 9,1966. ruary 7, 1966. This statement is made as of February Dated: February 7, 1966. 9,1966. J ulio A. N egroni. H ubbell Carpenter. Dated: February 9,1966. [FA Doc. 66-1980; FUed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:46 am .] [F.R. Doc. 66-1974; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:45 am .] Le w is W . Lengnick. [F.R. Doc. 66-1977; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; CLYDE M. EPPARD 8:45 a.m.] JOHN P. NEUBAUER Statement of Changes in Financial Statement of Changes in Financial Interests JOHN LAWRENCE McNEALEY Interests In accordance with the requirements Statement of Changes in Financial In accordance with the reqidrements of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Interests of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ Production Act of 1950, as amended, and duction Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, In accordance with the requirements Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ 1955, the following changes have taken

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3138 NOTICES place In my financial interests during the Dated: February 7, 1966. past6months: C. W . W atson. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (1) No change. [F.R. Doc. 66-1984; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Consumer and Marketing Service (2) No change. 8:46 am .] (3) No change. HUMANELY SLAUGHTERED (4) No change. CARL H. WILLIAMS LIVESTOCK This statement is made as of Febru­ ary 11, 1966. Statement of Changes in Financial Identification of Carcasses; Changes in List of Establishments Dated: February 11, 1966. Interests In accordance with the requirements Pursuant to section 4 of the Act of J. P. N eubauer. of section 710(b)(6) of the Defense August 27, 1958 (7 U.S.C. 1904), and the [F.R. Doc. 66-1981; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Production Act of 1950, as amended, and statement of policy thereunder in 9 CFR 8:46 am .] Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 381.1, the list (31 F.R. 1208) of estab­ 1955, the following changes have taken lishments which are operated under Fed­ place in my financial interests during eral inspection pursuant to the Meat RAFAEL R. RAMÍREZ the past 6 months: Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 71 et seq.) and Stafement of Changes in Financial (1) No change. which use humane methods of slaughter Interests (2) No change. and incidental handling of livestock is (3) No change. hereby amended as follows: In accordance with the requirements (4) No change. The reference to sheep and swine with of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ This statement is made as of Feb­ respect to Auburn Univérsity, establish­ duction Act of 1950, as amended, and ruary 7, 1966. ment 71, is deleted. Executive Order 10647 of November 28, The following table lists species at 1955, the following changes have taken Dated: February 8, 1966. additional establishments and additional place in my financial interests during the Carl H . W il l ia m s. species at previously listed establish­ past 6 months: [F.R. Doc. 66-1985; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; ments that have been reported as being (1) No change. 8:46 am .] slaughtered and handled humanely. (2) No change. (3) No change. E stablishments Slaughtering H umanely (4) No change. Dated: February 10,1966. Name of establishment Est. No. Cattle Calves Sheep Qoats Swine Horses R afael R . R amírez. 12VW n 281 ...... ' _____ (*) [F.R. Doc. 66-1982; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; R w, (ialls Hnn 73« (*) (*) 8:46 a.m.] New establishments reporting: 3. 2TJA ______n 1711 n 2« (*) LEROY J. SCHULTZ 117 ...... (*) 12fi <*) 1A2 Q Statement of Changes in Financial 171 . (*) Interests 224R _r...... (*) «4«...... (*) In accordance with the requirements «01 o «8« <*> of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro­ 747 (*) duction Act of 1950, as amended, and 7«fi A (*) 800 n Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 800 M 1955, the following changes have taken 018 n place in my financial interests during the Species added: 16. past 6 months: (1) None. Done at Washington, D.C., this 21st day of February 1966. (2) None. R . K . S omers, (3) None. Deputy Administrator, Consumer Protection, (4) None. i Consumer and Marketing Service. This statement is made as of February [F.R. Doc. 66-2017; Filed, Feb. 24,1966; 8:49 am .] 8,1966. Dated: February 8,1966. be reexported from Austria to Rumania LeR oy J. S chultz. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and that Petuch knew that the equip­ [F.R. Doc. 66-1983; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; ment was of U.S. origin and that U.S. law 8:46 a.m.] Bureau of International Commerce prohibited such reexportation without [Case No. 351] first obtaining authorization from the U.S. Government. The charging letter CHARLES W. WATSON BOLESLAW PETUCH AND was duly served on respondents. HYDRAULICS A.G. The respondents, who were repre­ Statement of Changes in Financial sented by counsel, filed an answer, but Interests Order Denying Export Privileges did not file a demand for an oral hearing. In accordance with the requirements In the matter of Mr. Boleslaw Petuch An informal hearing was held before the of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense and Hydraulics A. G. (a.k.a. Hydraulics Compliance Commissioner on December Production Act of 1950, as amended, and S.A.), 1 Wawragasse, Vienna XVI, Au­ 21, 1965, at which time evidence in sup­ Executive Order 10647 of November 28, stria, respondents; case No 351. port of the charges was presented on be­ 1955, the following changes have taken By letter dated November 19,1964, the half of the Investigations Division. The place in my financial interests during above respondents were charged with Compliance Commissioner has con­ the past 6 months: violations of the Export Control Act of sidered the record in the case and has (1) None. 1949, as amended, and regulations there­ submitted to the undersigned a written (2) None. under. It is alleged that during April report including findings of fact and (3) None. 1964 Hydraulics and its then owner, findings that violations have occurred, (4) None. Petuch, caused a shipment of U.S.-origin and he has recommended that the re­ This statement is made as of Feb­ petroleum and natural gas field equip­ medial action hereinafter set forth be ruary 7,1966. ment, valued at approximately $7,334, to taken against the respondents. On con-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3139 sidération of the record, I hereby adopt had received a telephone call from Ex­ of their import-export transactions as may the Compliance Commissioner’s: press reporting that it (Express) had be deemed appropriate. Such applications Findings of fact. 1. The respondent received a telegram from Masinimport will be considered on their merits and in the light of conditions and policies existing at Boleslaw Petuch was a resident of asking when the equipment in question that time. Export privileges may be restored Vienna, Austria, and was the owner and had been shipped and by what route. under such terms and conditions as appear operator of the respondent Hydraulics The forwarder requested written disposal to be appropriate. A.G. (also known as Hydraulics SA .), a instructions as to whether it could re­ firm which he organized in Vaduz, lease the shipment being held for export I have considered the record in the Liechtenstein. Hydraulics A.G. was the at Express. case and also thè report and recom­ European distributor for a U.S. manu­ 10. Sometime between April 6, 1964, mendation of the Compliance Commis­ facturer of oil field equipment. and April 16, 1964, Petuch gave instruc­ sioner and am of the opinion that his 2. On May 3, 1963, Hydraulics sub­ tions that the goods could be released recommendation as to the sanction that mitted a quotation to Masinimport, of for shipment to Masinimport in Ru­ should be imposed is fair and just and Bucharest, Rumania, for approximately mania. Pursuant to said instructions, calculated to achieve effective enforce­ $7,000 worth of oil field equipment manu­ Express took the goods in question (iden­ ment of the laVr. Accordingly, it is factured by the above-mentioned U.S. tified as those covered by Masinimport’s hereby manufacturer. On July 10,1963, Masin­ order of July 10, 1963) for further ship­ Ordered. I. All outstanding validated import accepted the quotation and ment for export to Rumania and deliv­ export licenses in which respondents placed an order for the equipment at a ered them to a Rumanian forwarding appear or participate in any manner or price of $7,334 with freight paid to the firm at the irrevocable disposition of capacity are hereby revoked and shall Austria-Czechoslovakia b o rd er. This Masinimport. By letter dated April 20, be returned forthwith to the Bureau of was later changed to Austria-Hungary 1964, Express notified Hydraulics of the International Commerce for cancella­ border. action it had taken in onforwarding the tion. 3. By application dated May 3, 1963, goods. II. Except as qualified in Part IV the U.S. manufacturer applied for 11. Petuch knew that it was in contra­ hereof, the respondents for the duration license to export $50,000 worth of oil vention of tliè U.S. export regulations to of export controls are hereby denied all field equipment to its distributor, Hy­ reexport the goods in question to Ru­ privileges of participating, directly or in­ draulics, in Vienna. A license was mania without first obtaining permission directly, in any manner or capacity, in granted on May 16, 1963, and permitted from the Office of Export Control, and he any transaction involving commodities resale in specified European countries, also knew at the time he authorized re­ or technical data exported from the not including Rumania. lease of the goods for shipment to Masin­ United States in whole or in part, or to 4. The items covered in Masinimport’s import that OEC had denied the request be exported, or which are otherwise sub­ order of July 10, 1963, were éxported by for such permission. ject to the export regulations. Without the U.S. manufacturer to Hydraulics in Prom the foregoing, I have concluded limitation of the generality of the fore­ Vienna sometime prior to August 23, that the respondents violated §§381.2 going, participation prohibited in any 1963, but the manufacturer did not know and 381.6 of the U.S. export regulations such transaction, either in the United at the time of exportation that Hydrau­ in that without specific authorization States or abroad, shall include partici­ lics had an order for the goods from a from the U.S. Department of Commerce pation: (a) As a party or as a repre­ Rumanian customer. they knowingly caused U.S.-origin com- sentative of a party to any validated ex­ 5. On August 23, 1963, the U.S. manu­ . modities to be reexported from Austria port license application; (b) in the facturer requested, on behalf of Hydrau­ to Rumania contrary to the provisions preparation or filing of any export li­ lics, permission from the Office of Export of the U.S. export regulations. cense application or reexportation au­ Control, Bureau of International Com­ In commenting on Petuch’s conduct in thorization, or document to be submitted merce, to reexport to Masinimport, the matter and in recommending the therewith; (c) in the obtaining or using Bucharest, Rumania, the equipment sanction that should be imposed on the of any validated or general export li­ .covered in Masinimport’s order of July respondents, the Compliance Commis­ cense or other export control documents; sioner said: (d) in the carrying on of negotiations 10,1963. Permission for such reexporta­ with respect to, or in the receiving, tion was denied by the Office of Export The conduct of Petuch in releasing the ordering, buying, selling, delivering, Control on November 1, 1963, and due goods for reexportation to Rumania was a notification was issued. deliberate violation of the U.S. export regu­ storing, using, or disposing of any com­ 6. While the request for permission to lations. The release was given with knowl­ modities or technical data; (e) in the reexport was pending, Petuch, on behalf edge that the Office of Export Control had financing, forwarding, transporting, or denied the request for permission to re­ other servicing of such commodities or of Hydraulics proceeded with arrange­ export the goods in question to Rumania. technical data. ments for the sale of the equipment to As above pointed out, Petuch’s difficulties HI. Such denial of export privileges Masinimport. On October 29, 1963, stemmed from the fact that he agreed shall extend not only to the respondents, Masinimport opened a letter of credit in to sell the goods in question to a customer but also to their successors, representa­ favor of Hydraulics at a Swiss bank in in Rumania without first finding out if the the amount of $7,334 to cover the goods goods could be delivered to that country in tives, agents, and employees, and also to in Masinimport’s order of July 10, 1963. conformity with the U.S. export regulations. any person, firm, corporation, or other 7. In October 1963 the freight for­ As a distributor of U.S. goods, it was in­ business organization with which they warding company which had been hold­ cumbent upon him, before entering into now or hereafter may be related by an obligation to deliver goods in a foreign affiliation, ownership, control, position of ing the goods for Hydraulics, at the country, to ascertain whether such delivery responsibility, or other connection in the request of Masinimport, turned the goods could be made in conformity with U.S. law. conduct of trade or services connected over to a second forwarding firm in This he failed to do, but on the contrary he therewith. Vienna; namely, Express Internationale obligated himself to deliver the goods be­ Spedition. Petuch instructed his freight fore permission was requested to reexport IV. Three years after the effective forwarder that the goods were not to be them to Rumania. It would appear that date of this order the respondents may released for onshipment except on his Petuch had decided before entering into the apply to have the effective denial of their contract with the foreign purchaser that he export privileges held in abeyance while written instructions, and his freight for­ would make delivery irrespective of the re­ they remain on probation. Such appli­ warder, in turn, gave the same instruc­ quirements of the US. export regulations. tions to Express. cations as may be filed by said respond­ To achieve the remedial purpose of sanc­ ents shall be supported by evidence 8. In January 1964, Masinimport tions in a case of this type, I recommend made the funds available to pay for the that the respondents be denied export showing compliance with the terms of goods on the letter of credit which it had privileges for the duration of export controls this order and such disclosure of details opened at the Swiss bank and thereafter with the privilege of applying after. three of their activities as may be necessary Petuch, on behalf of Hydraulics, received years to have their export privileges restored to determine their compliance with this payment on the letter of credit. ¡conditionally while they remain bn pro­ order. Such applications will be con­ bation. Such applications should be sup­ sidered on their merits and in the light 9. On April 6, 1964, Hydraulics’ for­ ported by evidence showing compliance with of conditions and policies existing at that warder wrote to Petuch stating that it the terms of the order and such disclosure time. The respondents’ export privi-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No.34 -5 3140 NOTICES

leges may be restored under such terms The evidence and recommendation of ownership, control, position of responsi­ and conditions as appear to be appro­ the Compliance Commissioner have been bility, or other connection in the conduct priate. considered. On the evidence presented, of trade or services connected therewith. V. During the time when any respond­there is reasonable basis to believe that IV. This order shall take effect forth­ ent or other person within the scope of the respondent Rad Reps (Factors) Ltd,, with and shall remain in effect for a pe­ this order is prohibited from engaging is a dealer in automotive spare parts and riod of 60 days from the date hereof, in any activity within the scope of Part has a place of business in Hounslow, Mid­ unless it is hereafter extended, amended, II hereof, no person, firm, corporation, dlesex, England; that the respondent An­ modified, or vacated in accordance with partnership, or other business organiza­ thony G. Hopkinson is a director in said the provisions of the U.S. Export tion, whether in the United States or firm and one of its principal officials; Regulations. elsewhere, without prior disclosure to that the respondent Hopkinson acted on V. No person, firm, corporation, part­ and specific authorization from the Bu­ behalf of the firm in the transactions in nership or other business organization, reau of International Commerce, shall question; that the respondent firm has whether in the United States or else­ do any of the following acts, directly or purchased substantial quantities of auto­ where, without prior disclosure to and indirectly, in any manner or capacity, motive spare parts from the United specific authorization from the Bureau on behalf of or in any association with States; that after delivery of said spare of International Commerce, shall do any any respondent or other person denied parts to the United Kingdom, the re­ of the following acts, directly or indirect­ export privileges within the scope of this spondents reexported them to Cuba with ly, or carry on negotiations with respect order, or whereby any such respondent knowledge that the reexportations were thereto, in any manner or capacity, on or such other person may obtain any in violation of the U.S. Export Regula­ behalf of or in any association with re­ benefit therefrom or have any interest tions. Further, there is reasonable basis spondents or any related party, or where­ or participation therein, directly or in­ to believe that said respondents will con­ by the respondents or related party may directly: (a) Apply for, obtain, transfer, tinue such conduct in contravention of obtain any benefit therefrom or have or use any license, shipper’s export dec­ the Export Control Act and Regulations any interest or participation therein, di­ laration, bill of lading, or other export unless U.S. export privileges are tempo­ rectly or indirectly: (a) Apply for, ob­ control document relating to any expor­ rarily denied. Formal charges have been tain, transfer, or use any license, Ship­ tation, reexportation, transshipment, or brought against the respondents charg­ per’s Export Declaration, bill of lading, diversion of any commodity or technical ing them with the said violations. I find or other export control document re­ data exported or to be exported from the that an order temporarily denying ex­ lating to any exportation, reexporta­ United States, by, to, or for any such port privileges to the respondents is rea­ tion, transshipment, or diversion of any respondent or other person denied ex­ sonably necessary for the protection of commodity or technical data exported port privileges within the scope of this the public interest and national security. or to be exported from the United States, order; or (b) order, buy, receive, use, Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: by, to, or for any such respondent or re­ sell, deliver, store, dispose of, forward, I. All outstanding validated export li­lated party denied export privileges; or transport, finance, or otherwise service censes in which respondents appear or (b) order, buy, receive, use, sell, deliver, or participate in any exportation, re­ participate in any manner or capacity store, dispose of, forward, transport, exportation, transshipment, or diversion are hereby revoked and shall be returned finance, or otherwise service or partici­ of any commodity or technical data ex­ forthwith to the Bureau of International pate in any exportation, reexportation, ported or to be exported from the United Commerce for cancellation. transshipment, or diversion of any com­ States. n . The respondents, their successors, modity or technical data exported or to This order shall become effective on assigns, partners, representatives, agents, be exported from the United States. February 25, 1966. and employees hereby are denied all VI. A copy of this order shall be served privileges of participating, directly or in­ upon the respondents. Dated: February 16, 1966. directly, in any manner or capacity, in VII. In accordance with the provisions R auer H. M eyer, any transaction involving commodities of § 382.11(c) of the Export Regulations, Director, or technical data exported from the the respondents or any related party Office of Export Control. United States in whole or in part, or to be may move at any time to vacate or mod­ exported, or which are otherwise subject ify this temporary denial order by filing [F.R. Doc. 66-1925; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; to the Export Regulations. Without lim­ an appropriate motion therefor, sup­ 8:45 a.m.] itation of the generality of the foregoing, ported by evidence, with the Compliance participation prohibited in any such Commissioner and may request an oral [File 23 (65)-55] transaction, either in the United States hearing thereon which, if requested, shall or abroad, shall include participation, be held before the Compliance Commis­ RAD REPS (FACTORS) LTD., ET AL. directly or indirectly, in any manner or sioner in Washington, D.C., at the Order Temporarily Denying Export capacity: (a) As a party or as a repre­ earliest convenient date. Privileges sentative of a party to any validated ex­ This order shall become effective port license application; (b) in the prep­ forthwith. In the matter of Rad Reps (Factors) aration or filing of any export license Ltd., and Anthony G. Hopkinson, Law­ application or reexportation authoriza­ Dated: February 18,1966. rence Estates, Green Lane Hounslow, tion, or any document to be submitted R atter H. M eyer, Middlesex, England, respondents; File therewith; (c) in the obtaining or using ^ Director, Office of Export Control. 23 (65)-55. of any validated or general export license [F.R. Doc. 66-2043; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; The Director, Investigations Division, or other export control document; (d) in 8:49 ajn.] Office of Export Control, Bureau of In­ the carrying on of negotiations with ternational Commerce, U.S. Department respect to, or in the receiving, ordering, of Commerce, pursuant to the provisions buying, selling, delivering, storing, using, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ of § 382.11 of the Export Regulations or disposing of any commodities or tech­ (Title 15, Chapter m , Sub-chapter B, nical data in whole or in part exported Code of Federal Regulations), has ap­ or to be exported from the United States; CATION, AND WELFARE plied to the Compliance Commissioner and (e) in the financing, forwarding, Food and Drug Administration for an order temporarily denying all ex­ transporting, or other servicing of such port privileges to the above-named re­ commodities or technical data. FUNGICIDE DODINE spondents. The Compliance Commis­ HI. Such denial of export privileges Notice of Extension of Temporary sioner has reviewed the application and shall extend not only to the respond­ Tolerance the evidence presented in support there­ ents, but also to their agents and em­ of and has submitted his report, together ployees and to any successor and to any American Cyanamid Co., Post Office with his recommendation that the ap­ person, firm, corporation, or business Box 400, Princeton, N.J., 08540, was plication be granted and that a tempo­ organization with which they now or granted an extension of a temporary tol­ rary denial order be issued for 60 days. hereafter may be related by affiliation, erance of 5 parts per million for residues

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3141 of the fungicide dodine in or on the raw Dated: February 17,1966. tion (FAP 6B1927> has been filed by agricultural commodity peaches. This J.K.K irk , Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., Post temporary tolerance will expire February Assistant Commissioner Office Box 200, Pisgah Forest, N.C., 26,1966. for Operations. 28768, proposing an amendment to Because of the very dry growing season § 121.2507 Cellophane to provide for the in the experimental use areas during [F.R. Doc. 66-2005; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; safe use of additional optional sub­ 1965, extension of the temporary toler­ 8:48 ajn.] stances in the manufacture of food­ ance has been requested again to permit packaging cellophane, as follows: additional tests. The Commissioner of NICKEL SULFATE AND MANEB Dialkyl ketones: Food and Drugs has determined that such Behenone. extension of the temporary tolerance will Notice of Extension of Temporary Laurone. protect the public health. Conditions Tolerances for Pesticide Chemicals Stearone. under which the temporary tolerance is Defoaming agents identified in § 121.2557. extended are as follows: Rohm & Haas Co., 22 West Washing­ Di(2-ethylbutyl) phthalate. 1. The total amount of the finished ton Square, Philadelphia, Pa., 19105, was Dihydfoabietyl phthalate. granted a temporary tolerance of 45 parts Glyoxal. product containing 65 percent dodine to Polyethylene glycol (400) monolaurate. be used under the experimental permit per million for residues of the fungicide Polyethyleneglycol (600) monolaurate. issued by the U.S. Department of Agri­ nickel sulfate (calculated as Ni) and a Polyethylene glycol (400) monooleate. culture will not exceed 91,800 pounds. temporary tolerance of 2 parts per mil­ Polyethylene glycol (600) monooleate. Distribution will be under the American lion for residues of the fungicide maneb Polyethylene glycol (400) monostearate. Cyanamid Co. name. in or on the raw agricultural commodi­ Polyethyleneglycol (600) monostearate. 2. The fungicide will not be marketed ties grain and straw of oats and wheat. Sodium lauroyl sarcosinate. for general use on peaches but will be These temporary tolerances will expire Stannous oleate. supplied to qualified persons, as indicated February 15,1966. Dated: February 17,1966. in the experimental permit, for bona fide Because of the low incidence of rust experimental use. disease in oats and wheat on which these J. K . K irk, 3. The American Cyanamid Co. will fungicides were tested, further extension Assistant Commissioner comply with the requirements of § 120.31 of the temporary tolerances has been for Operations. (e) (3) and (4) of the pesticide chemical requested to permit additional tests dur­ [F.R. Doc. 66-2007; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; regulations (21 CFR Part 120). ing the coming year. The Commissioner 8:49 a.m.] This temporary tolerance expires Feb­ of Food and Drugs has determined that ruary 26,1967. such additional extension of the tempo­ This action is taken pursuant to the rary tolerances will not adversely affect authority vested in the Secretary of the public health. Conditions under CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Health, Education, and Welfare by the which these temporary tolerances are [Docket 16928] Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act extended are as follows: (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 516; 21 U.S.C. 346a 1. The total amount of the finished DETROIT-TORONTO, ERIE-TORONTO (j)) and delegated by him to the Com­ product containing 19 percent anhydrous ROUTE CASE missioner (21 CFR 2.90). nickel sulfate and 53 percent maneb to be used under the experimental permit Notice of Postponement of Prehearing Dated: February 17, 1966. issued by the U.S. Department of Agri­ Conference J . K . K irk, culture will not exceed 25,000 pounds. Notice hereby is given that the pre- Assistant Commissioner Distribution will be under the Rohm & hearing conference in the above-indi­ for Operations. Haas Co. name. cated proceeding, now assigned to be 2. The fungicides will not be marketed [F.R. Doc. 66-2004; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; held March 1, 1966, is postponed until for general use but will be supplied to 2 p.m. (local time), March 2, 1966, in 8:48 a.m.] qualified persons for bona fide experi­ mental use. Room 726, Universal Building, 1825 Con­ 3. The Rohm & Haas Co. Will comply necticut Avenue NW„ Washington, D.C. INTERNATIONAL MINERALS AND with the requirements of § 120.31(e) (3) Dated at Washington, D.C., February CHEMICAL CORP. and (4) of the pesticide chemical regu­ 18,1966. lations (21 CFR Part 120). Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding [ seal] H erbert K. B ryan, These temporary tolerances expire Hearing Examiner. a Pesticide Chemical February 15,1967. This action is taken pursuant to the [F.R. Doc. 66-2012; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ 8:49 a.m.] eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. authority vested in the Secretary of 408(d)(1), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a Health, Education, and Welfare by the (d) (1) ), notice is given that a petition Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (PP 6F0471) has been filed by Markel (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 516; 21 UJS.C. 346a ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and Hill, Munsey Building, Washington, (j )) and delegated by him to the Com­ D.C., 20004, on behalf of International missioner (21 CFR 2.90). [Docket No. 50-246] Minerals and Chemical Corp., Wasco, Dated: February 17,1966. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION Calif., 93280, proposing the establish­ ment of an exemption from the require­ J. K . K irk, Notice of Issuance of Facility License ment of a tolerance for residues of the Assistant Commissioner for Operations. Please take notice that, no request for insecticide containing viable spores of a hearing or petition to intervene having the micro-organism Bacillus thuringien- [F.R. Doc. 66-2006; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; been filed following publication of the 8:48 a.m .] sis Berliner in or on collards, grapes, kale, notice of proposed action in the F ed­ mustard greens, strawberries, sweet corn, eral R egister, the Atomic Energy Com­ and turnip greens. OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP. mission has issued, effective as of the The analytical method proposed in the date of issuance, Facility License No. petition for determining residues of Notice of Filing of Petition for Food CX-24 to the Gefteral Dynamics Corp. viable spores of Bacillus thuringiensis Additive Cellophane authorizing operation of the Annular Berliner is a spore-count assay that con­ Core Reactor Experiment nuclear reactor sists of a standard plate count procedure . Pursuant to the provisions of the facility on the corporation’s laboratory using a heat-treated suspension (60° C. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act site at Torrey Pines Mesa, Calif. for 60 minutes) of the material to be (sec. 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. The license was issued as set forth in tested. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a peti­ the notice of proposed issuance pub-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3142 NOTICES llshed in the F ederal R egister, January mission, Washington, D.C., 20545, At­ cated within their respective districts, for 19,1966, 31 F.R. 719, except that the staff tention: Director, Division of Reactor a change of office location not more than requested and obtained from General Licensing. one-half mile from the existing location Dynamics Corp. a clarifying amendment Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 16th day provided that such authorization shall to its application (which constitutes the of February 1966. not extend to cases wherein the proposed technical specifications to the license) change of location would necessitate an to assure that the end reflectors or plugs For the Atomic Energy Commission. amendment to the Charter of the appli­ of the experiment tube are in place dur­ R . L . D o a n , cant association. ing core loading. Director, Resolved further, that said Presidents Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 17th day Division of Reactor Licensing. are hereby authorized to give final ap­ of February 1966. proval to such applications for a change [License No. R-84; Arndt. No. 9] of office location beyond one-half mile For the Atomic Energy Commission. Am endm ent to Facility License but not more than 1 mile from the exist­ E. G. Case, The Atomic Energy Commission (herein­ ing location provided that such authori­ Director, after referred to as “the Commission”) hav­ zation shall not extend to cases wherein Division of Reactor Licensing. ing found that: the proposed change of location would a. The application for amendment dated necessitate an amendment to the Char­ [F.R. Doc. 66-2009; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; October 12, 1965, complies w ith the require­ ter of the applicant association: Pro­ 8:49 a.m.] ments of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as vided, further, That, with respect to each amended, and the Commission’s regulations such application, the Bank President set forth in Title 10, Chapter 1, CFR; [Docket No. 50-170] b. Operation of the reactor in accordance shall first give notice of the proposed with the license, as amended, will not pre­ move to all institutions considered by him ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGY sent undue hazard to the health and safety to have a legitimate competitive interest RESEARCH INSTITUTE of the public and will not be inimical to the in the proposal, that he shall give due common defense and security; weight to all views expressed in response Notice of Issuance of Facility License c. Prior public notice of proposed issu­ to such notice, and, in the event he re­ Amendment ance of the amendment is not required since ceives any objection, he shall refer the the amendment does not involve significant Please take notice that the Atomic hazards considerations different from those application to the Board for its consid­ Energy Commission has issued, effective previously evaluated. eration and formal action. as of the date of issuance, Amendment License No. R-84, issued to Armed Forces Resolved further, that, with respect to No. 9, set forth below, to Facility Li­ Radiobiology Research Institute, is hereby all applications for a change of office cense No. Rr-84. The license authorized amended in the following respects: location by associations, other than Armed Forces Radiobiology Research In­ (1) Paragraph 3.B. is revised in its en­ Federal associations, incorporated, or­ tirety to read as follows: ganized, or doing business in the District stitute (AFRRI) to operate its DASA- “3.B. Pursuant to the Act and Title 10, TRIGA Mark F nuclear reactor located CFR, Chapter 1, Part 70, ‘Special Nuclear of Columbia, the President of the Fed­ on the National Naval Medical Center Material,’ to receive, possess and use up to eral Home Loan Bank of Greensboro is site in Bethesda, Md. The amendment 5.0 kilograms of contained uranium-235 for hereby authorized to give final approval (1) authorizes AFRRI to change the use in connection with operation of the to the same extent, and subject to the physical structure of the fast neutron ex­ reactor.” same limitations, as the Presidents of the posure room to permit entry of an (2) In addition to the activities pre­ several Federal Home Loan Banks are au­ underground beamport extending from viously authorized by the Commission in thorized by this resolution with respect License No. R-84, as amended, Armed Forces to applications by Federal savings and the new positive ion accelerator build­ Radiobiology Research Institute is author­ ing, (2) authorizes AFRRI to discharge ized: loan associations. all reactor building effluents to a new (a) To change the physical structure of Resolved further, that the Secretary stack, and (3) changes the amount of the fast neutron exposure room to permit to the Board is directed to transmit the contained uranium 235 that may be re­ the entry of an underground beamport ex­ foregoing to the Office of the Federal ceived, possessed and used under the tending from the new positive ion acceler­ Register for publication. license from 8.2 kilograms to 5.0 kilo­ ator building, and (b) To discharge all reactor building By the Federal Home Loan Bank grams, as described in the application effluents to a new stack, as described in the Board. amendment dated October 12, 1965. application for license amendment dated Within 15 days from the date of pub­ October 12, 1965. [seal] H arry W. Caulsen, lication of this notice in the F ederal This amendment is effective as of the date Secretary. R egister, the applicant may file a re­ of issuance. [F.R. Doc. 66-1994; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; quest for a hearing, and any person For the Atomic Energy Commission. 8:47 a.m.] whose interest may be affected by this proceeding may file a petition for leave Date of issuance: February 16, 1966. to intervene. Requests for a hearing Director, and petitions to intervene shall be filed Division of Reactor Licensing. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION in accordance with the provisions of the [F.R. Doc. 66-1963; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; FARRELL LINES, INC., AND DELTA Commission’s regulations (10 CFR Part 8:45 a.m.] 2). If a request for a hearing or a peti­ STEAMSHIP LINES, INC. tion for leave to intervene is filed within Notice of Agreement Filed for the time prescribed in this notice, the Commission will issue a notice of hear­ FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD Approval ing or an appropriate order. [No. 19,728] -Notice is hereby given that the follow­ For further details with respect to ing agreement has been filed with the this amendment, see (1) the licensee’s FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN Commission for approval pursuant to application for license amendment dated ASSOCIATIONS section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as October 12,1965, and (2) a related Safety amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Evaluation prepared by the Test and Approvals of Change of Office U.S.C. 814). Power Reactor Safety Branch of the Location Interested parties may inspect and ob­ Division of Reactor Licensing, both of tain a copy of the agreement at the F ebruary 17, 1966. which are available for public inspec­ Washington office .of the Federal Mari­ tion at the Commission’s Public Docu­ Resolved, that the Presidents of the time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., ment Room, 1717 H Street NW., Wash­ Federal Home Loan Banks, as Supervi­ Room 609; or may inspect agreements at ington, D.C. A copy of item (2) above sory Agents of the Federal Home Loan the offices of the District Managers, New may be obtained at the Commission’s Bank Board, are hereby authorized to York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San Public Document Room or upon request give final approval to applications, by Francisco, Calif. Comments with ref­ addressed to the Atomic Energy Com­ Federal savings and loan associations lo­ erence to an agreement including a re-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3143 quest for hearing, if desired, may be sub­ It is further ordered, That the Direc­ to prove up the economics of the pro­ mitted to the Secretary, Federal Mari­ tor, Bureau of Domestic Regulation posed lateral construction, we conclude time Commission, Washington, D.C., forthwith revoke license No. 703 if the that the public convenience and neces­ 20573, within 20 days after publication licensee fails to comply with this order. sity requires a formal hearing in these of this notice in the F ederal R egister. It is further ordered, That a copy of matters and shall so order. Additionally, A copy of any such statement should also this order to show cause and all subse­ in view of the possibility that Tennessee be forwarded to the party filing the quent orders in this matter be served could provide any required additional agreement (as indicated hereinafter) upon the licensee and be published in the service to Hartford in the North Bloom­ and the comments should indicate that F ederal R egister. field area, without detriment to the pres­ ent or foreseeable demands of its existing this has been done. [seal] T homas Lis i , Notice of agreement filed for approval Secretary. customers, through use of its existing by: facilities traversing the area, we will now [F.R. Doc. 66-2013; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; issue and consolidate in such hearing an Mr. J. Gerald Shea, Traffic Manager-Opera­ 8:49 a.m.] tions, Farrell Lines, Inc., 1 Whitehall Street, order to show cause why Tennessee New York, N.Y., 10004. should not be required, under section 7 (a) of the Natural Gas Act, to establish Agreement 9526, between Farrell Lines, a physical connection of its facilities Inc., and Delta Steamship Lines, Inc., FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION with those of Hartford and to sell to establishes a through billing arrange­ [Docket Nos. CP65-340, CP66-263] Hartford volumes of gas necessary for ment for movement of cargo between the rendition of service to the new area. U.S. Gulf ports and the Liberian ports ALGO N Q UIN GAS TRANSMISSION This show cause proceeding will, of of Harbel, Buchanan, Sinoe, and Cape CO. AND TENNESSEE GAS TRANS­ course, not be limited solely to the ques­ Palmas with transshipment at Monrovia, MISSION CO. tion of whether Tennessee could provide Liberia, in accordance with terms and the service directly to Hartford consist­ conditions set forth in the agreement. Order To Show Cause, Consolidating ent with the standards of section 7(a), This agreement upon approval will su­ and Setting Date of Hearing but should also include the comparative persede and. cancel F.M.C. Agreement F ebruary 16,1966. benefits, if any, if such service were to 8426 between the same parties and in be rendered by Algonquin either by ex­ the same trade. On September 29, 1965, we issued a notice of “Petition To Amend” filed by change agreement with Tennessee or by Dated: February 21, 1966. transportation by Tennessee for the ac­ Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. (Al­ count of Algonquin. By order of the Federal Maritime gonquin) in Docket No. CP65-340. In The Commission orders: Commission. said filing Algonquin seeks amendment (A) An order to show cause is hereby T homas Li s i , of the authorization granted by the Secretary. Commission on August 24, 1965, in issued against Tennessee Gas Transmis­ Docket No. CP65-340, so as to now con­ sion Co. why it should not be required, [F.R. Doc. 66-1997; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; under section 7(a) of the Natural Gas 8:48 a.m.] struct an additional 23.6-mile, 16-inch lateral pipeline from its existing facili­ Act, to establish a physical connection ties in Connecticut to the vicinity of of its facilities with those of Hartford [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder North Bloomfield, Conn., at an estimated Gas Co. and to sell to said company License 703] cost of $2,887,000. These facilities are volumes of gas necessary for the rendi­ tion of service to the above-mentioned INTERSTATE AUTO SHIPPERS, INC. proposed to be used essentially to de­ liver to the Hartford Gas Co. (Hartford), new area. Order To Show Cause an existing customer of Algonquin, (B) Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. volumes of gas previously authorized to shall within 15 days of the issuance of On February 1, 1966, the New be delivered through other facilities au­ this order respond to the “Order To Hampshire Insurance Co. (Eimieke & thorized in our above-mentioned order Show Cause” and shall, further, be pre­ Loren, Inc., agents), notified the Com­ of August 24,1965. However, the capac­ pared, upon the hearing date set herein, mission that the surety bond filed pur­ ity of the proposed new line appears to be to present witnesses to testify in regard suant to section 44(c), Shipping Act, considerably greatly in excess of Hart­ to matters set forth in said response. 1916 (46 U.S.C. 1245) by Interstate Auto ford’s needs as projected over the next (C) Pursuant to the authority con­ Shippers, Inc., 205 West 34th Street, New 3-year period for the area involved. ferred on the Federal Power Commission York, N.Y., would be canceled effective The new area proposed to be served by by the Natural Gas Act and the Commis­ 12:01 a.m., March 4, 1966. Hartford, through use of the volumes sion’s rules of practice and procedure, a Section 44(c) of the Shipping Act, to be delivered off of the proposed Al­ consolidated hearing will be held on 1816 (46 U.S.C. 841b) and § 510.5(f) of gonquin lateral, is presently traversed March 21, 1966, at 10 a.m., e.s.t., in a General Order 4 (46 CFR) provide that by Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. hearing room of the Federal Power Com­ no license shall remain in force unless (Tennessee). Thus the proposed Al­ mission, 441 G Street NW., Washington, such forwarder shall have furnished a gonquin lateral would, if constructed, D.C., respecting the matters set forth in bond. parallel and duplicate the existing 16- the instant application filed by Algon­ Section 44(d) of the Shipping Act, 1916 inch pipeline of Tennessee. Although it quin Gas Transmission Co. and the or­ (46 U.S.C. 841b) provides that licenses der to show cause directed to Tennessee may, after notice and hearing, be appears that Tennessee could deliver to suspended or revoked for willful failure Hartford, at the very least, the requisite Gas Transmission Co. to comply with any provision of the Act, volumes of gas necessary for the im­ By the Commission. or with any lawful rule of the Commis­ mediate institution of service to the new area at a comparatively minor expendi­ [ seal] G ordon M. G rant, sion promulgated thereunder. * ture, no petition to intervene or a com­ Acting Secretary. Therefore, it is ordered, That Inter­ petitive proposal was submitted by [F.R. Doc. 66-1967; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; state Auto Shippers, me., on or before Tennessee. 8:45 a.m.] February 28, 1966, either (1) submit a In view of (1) the necessity of accu­ valid bond effective on or before March 4, rately determining the market require­ 1966, or (2) show cause in writing or ments of the new area and (2) the re­ [Docket No. CP66-264] request a hearing to be held at 10 a.m., lated impact on the economic feasibility NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. OF on March 2, 1966, in Room 505, Federal of the proposed lateral when viewed, par­ AMERICA Maritime Commission, 1321 H Street ticularly, in juxtaposition to our previous NW.t Washington, D.C., 20573, to show authorization herein for the construction Notice of Application cause why its license should not be of other facilities requested by Algonquin F ebruary 17,1966. suspended or revoked pursuant to sec­ so as to enable it to deliver to Hartford Take notice that on February 11, 1966, tion 44 (d), Shipping Act, 1916. the very volumes it now seeks to utilize Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3144 NOTICES

(Applicant), 122 South Michigan Ave­ securities exchanges: Atchison, Topeka nue, Chicago, 111., 60603, filed in Docket OFFICE OF EMERGENCY & Santa Fe Railway Co., File 7-2515. No. CP66-264 an application pursuant to Upon receipt of a request, on or before section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for PLANNING March 7, 1966, from any interested per­ a certificate of public convenience and son, the Commission will determine necessity authorizing the sale and deliv­ AMERICAN SAMOA whether the application shall be set ery of an additional 2,000 Mcf of gas per Notice of Major Disaster down for hearing. Any such request day to Interstate Power Co. (Interstate), should state briefly the nature of the an existing customer of Applicant, all as Pursuant to the authority vested in interest of the person making the re­ more fully set forth in the application me by the President under Executive quest and the position he proposes to which is on file with the Commission and Order 10427 of January 16, 1953, Execu­ take at the hearing, if ordered. In addi­ open to public inspection. tive Order 10737 of October 29, 1957, and tion, any interested person may submit Applicant states that it has been in­ Executive Order 11051 of September 27, his views or any additional facts bearing formed by letter dated February 2, 1966, 1962 (18 F.R. 407, 22 F.R. 8799, 27 F.R. on the said application by means of a that Interstate requires an additional 9683); Reorganization Plan No. 1 of letter addressed to the Secretary, Secu­ firm service of 2,000 Mcf of gas per day 1958, Public Law 85-763, and Public Law rities and Exchange Commission, Wash­ due to a depletion in its storage service, 87-206; by virtue of the Act of Septem­ ington, D.C., 20549, not later than the the addition of a number of new firm cus­ ber 30, 1950, entitled “An Act to au­ date specified. If no one requests a tomers, a shortage of propane for use in thorize Federal assistance to States and hearing, this application will be deter­ its peak shaving facilities and an ex­ local governments in major disasters, mined by order of the Commission on the tended period of extreme temperature. and for other purposes” (42 U.S.C. 1855- basis of the facts stated therein and The proposed additional service will in­ 1855g), as amended; notice is hereby other information contained in the offi­ crease Applicant’s deliveries to Interstate given of a declaration of “major dis­ cial files of the Commission pertaining to a total of 27,934 Mcf of gas per day. aster” by the President in his letter dated thereto. The application states that the pro­ February 10, 1966, reading in part as follows: For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ posed sale volumes will be obtained gated authority). through the utilization of Applicant’s I have determined that the damage in existing unallocated capacity of 26,962 various areas of the Territory of American [ seal] O rval L. D uB o is, Mcf of gas per day. The application Samoa adversely affected by a typhoon and Secretary. further states that upon the grant of extreme tidal conditions beginning on or about January 29, 1966, is of sufficient [F.R. Doc. 66-1986; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; authorization requested by the instant 8:46 a.m.] application, together with the receipt of severity and magnitude to warrant Federal assistance to supplement Territorial and authorization to sell 1,000 Mcf of gas per local efforts. day out of unallocated capacity, which [File No. 1-3421] authorization was applied for by Appli­ I do hereby determine the entire CONTINENTAL VENDING MACHINE cant on February 9, 1966, in Docket No. Territory of American Samoa to have CP66-262, Applicant’s unallocated capac­ been adversely affected by the catas­ CORP. ity will be 23,962 Mcf. trophe declared a major disaster by the Order Suspending Trading Applicant states that no additional fa­ President in his declaration of Febru­ cilities will be required to implement the ary 10, 1966. F ebruary 18, 1966. proposed additional service. Dated: February 18, 1966. The common stock, 10 cents par value, Protests or petitions to intervene may of Continental Vending Machine Corp., be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ F ranklin B . D ryden, being listed and registered on the Amer­ sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ Acting Director, ican Stock Exchange and having un­ ance with the rules of practice and pro­ Office of Emergency Planning. listed trading privileges on the Philadel- cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ [F.R. Doc. 66-1966; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; phia-Baltimore-Washington Stock Ex­ lations under the Natural Gas Act 8:45 a .m.] change; and the 6 percent convertible (157.10) on or before March 10, 1966. subordinated debentures due September Take further notice that, pursuant to 1,1976, being listed and registered on the the authority contained in and subject American Stock Exchange, pursuant to to the jurisdiction conferred upon the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE provisions of the Securities Exchange Federal Power Commission by sections 7 Act of 1934; and and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the COMMISSION It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ [File 7-2515] change Commission that the summary cedure, a hearing will be held without suspension of trading in such securities further notice before the Commission on ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE on such Exchanges and otherwise than this application if no protest or petition RAILWAY CO. on a national securities exchange is re­ to intervene is filed within the time re­ quired in the public interest and for the quired herein, if the Commission on its Application for Unlisted Trading protection of investors; own review of the matter finds that a Privileges and Opportunity for It is ordered, pursuant to sections grant of the certificate is required by the Hearing 15(c)(5) and 19(a)(4) of the Securities public convenience and necessity. If a Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in protest or petition for leave to intervene F ebruary 18, 1966. such securities on the American Stock is timely filed, or if the Commission on In the matter of application of the Exchange, the Philadelphia-Baltimore- its own motion believes that a formal Boston Stock Exchange for unlisted Washington Stock Exchange and other­ hearing is required, further notice of such trading privileges in a certain security. wise than on a national securities ex­ hearing will be duly given. The above named national securities change be summarily suspended, this Under the procedure herein provided exchange has filed an application with order to be effective for the period Feb­ for, unless otherwise advised, it will be the Securities and Exchange Commission ruary 21, 1966, through March 2, 1966, unnecessary for Applicant to appear or pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of the both dates inclusive. be represented at the hearing. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 12f—1 thereunder, for unlisted trad­ By the Commission. J oseph H. G utride, ing privileges in the 5 percent noncumu- [seal] O rval L. DuBors, Secretary. lative preferred stock of the following Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 66-1968; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; company, which security is listed and [F.R. Doc. 66-1987; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] registered on one or more other national 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3145

[812—1919] and on or prior to March 15, 1986, into Applicant submits that it is appro­ common stock of International. Any priate in the public interest and con­ INTERNATIONAL UTILITIES OVERSEAS additional debt securities of applicant sistent with the protection of investors CAPITAL CORP. which may be issued to or held by the and the purposes fairly intended by the public will be guaranteed by Interna­ policies and provisions of the Act for Filing of Application for Order tional in a manner similar to the guar­ the Commission to enter an order ex­ Exempting Company antee of the Bonds. empting applicant from each and every F ebruary 18,1966. \ It is intended that at least 85 percent provision of the Act for the following of all the assets of the applicant will be reasons: (1) A significant purpose of Notice is hereby given that Interna­ invested in or loaned to foreign sub­ the applicant is to assist in improving tional Utilities Overseas Capital Corp. sidiaries of International or other for­ the balance-of-payments program of the (“applicant”), 3219 Philadelphia Pike, eign companies (including U.S. com­ United States by obtaining funds for Claymont, Del., 19703, has filed an ap­ panies all or substantially all of whose foreign operations in foreign countries; plication pursuant to section 6(c) of the business is carried on abroad) in which (2) the payment of the Bonds, which is Investment Company Act of 1940 International directly or indirectly has, guaranteed by International, and the (“Act”) for an order exempting it from or will acquire, an equity interest of 10 value of the right to convert the Bonds by all provisions of the Act and the rules percent or more. Not more than 15 per­ exchanging them for shares of Interna­ and regulations thereunder. All inter­ cent of applicant’s assets may be in­ tional common stock, do not depend on ested persons are referred to the appli­ vested in or loaned to unrelated foreign the operation or investment policy of the cation on file with the Commission for a companies. Applicant will proceed as applicant, for Bond holders may ulti­ statement of the representations therein, expeditiously as practicable with the in­ mately look to the business enterprise of which are summarized below. vestment of its assets in the manner International; (3) none of the securities The applicant was organized by In­ described above. Pending the develop­ of the applicant, other than debt securi­ ternational Utilities Corp. (“Interna­ ment of final investment plans, and from ties, will be held by any person other tional”) under the laws of the State of time to time thereafter in connection than International or a wholly owned Delaware on February 16, 1966. Inter­ with changes in long-term investments, subsidiary of International; (4) appli­ national will subscribe for all of the capi­ the assets of applicant may be invested cant will not deal or trade in securities; tal stock of the applicant to be issued, on a short-term basis outside the United (5) applicant’s security holders will have consisting of 300 shares of common stock States or in time deposits in banks the benefit of the disclosure and report­ with a par value of $100 per share. In­ abroad. ing provisions of the Securities Ex­ ternational will pay an aggregate amount The Bonds are to be sold to under­ change Act of 1934 and of the New York of $300,000 in cash, securities, or other writers under conditions which are in­ Stock Exchange because of the fact that property for such stock on or before tended to assure that the Bonds will the common stock of International is March 1, 1966. International will, not not be sold to nationals or residents listed; (6) the Bonds will be sold only to later than September 1, 1966, make a of the United States or its territories foreign nationals and the burden of the capital contribution to the applicant or possessions. The managing under­ interest equalization tax will discourage consisting of additional cash, securi­ writer will agree to sell the Bonds resale to any U.S. national or resident. ties or other property so that the capital (i) only to foreign underwriters who of applicant will not be less than $1,500,- Notice is further given that any inter­ 000 at that date. Any additional securi­ will agree not to directly or indirectly ested person may, not later than March sell, offer to sell, buy, offer to buy 7,1966, at 12:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ ties which the applicant may issue, other or otherwise effect any transaction in the than debt securities, will be issued only mission in writing a request for a hear­ United States or its territories or pos­ ing on the matter accompanied by a to International. International will sessions or offer to sell the Bonds to any continue to own all shares of the appli­ statement as to the nature of his interest, cant’s common stock and any additional person who is a resident or national of the reason for such request and the is­ the United States or its territories or sues, if any, of fact or of law proposed securities of the applicant so acquired possessions; and (ii) only to United and will not dispose of the securities of to be controverted, or he may request States underwriters who will agree not that he be notified if the Commission applicant except to the applicant itself to directly or indirectly sell or offer to or to another wholly owned subsidiary should order a hearing thereon. Any sell the Bonds to any person who is a such communication should be ad­ of International. resident or national of the U.S. or its ter­ International, a Maryland corpora­ dressed: Secretary, Securities and Ex­ ritories or possessions. In addition, the change Commission, Washington, D.C., tion, operates public utility companies managing underwriter will agree to sell in Western Canada, shipping companies 20549. A copy of such request shall be engaged in foreign trade, a trucking or allow the sale of the Bonds only to served personally or by mail (airmail dealers who agree not to sell or offer to if the person being served is located more company operating throughout the sell, directly or indirectly, the Bonds to United States, bus companies with routes than 500 miles from the point of mail­ in Western Canada, several industrial any person who is a resident or national ing) upon applicant at the address stated of the United States or its territories or above. Proof of such service (by affi­ companies in the United States and possessions. overseas, and a company which holds a davit or in case of an attorney at law diversified portfolio of securities. Counsel has advised the applicant that by certificate) shall be filed contempo­ A principal purpose for organizing the U.S. persons will be required to report raneously with the request. At any time applicant was to provide assistance in and pay interest equalization tax with after said date, as provided by Rule 0-5 improving the balance-of-payments respect to acquisitions of the Bonds, ex­ of the rules and regulations promulgated position of the United States, in com­ cept where a specific statutory exemp­ under the Act, an order disposing of the pliance with the voluntary cooperation tion is available. Thus, by financing its application herein may be issued by the program instituted by the President in foreign operations through the appli­ Commission upon the basis of the infor­ February, 1965, while at the same time cant rather than through sale of its own debt obligations, International will uti­ mation stated in said application, unless continuing the expansion and develop­ an order for hearing upon said applica­ ment of International’s operations out­ lize an instrumentality the acquisition of whose debt obligations by U.S. persons tion shall be issued upon request or upon side the United States. Applicant in­ the Commission’s own motion. tends to issue and sell an aggregate of would, generally, subject such persons $15,000,000 principal amount of its Guar­ to interest equalization tax, thereby For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ anteed Convertible Bonds (“Bonds”). tending to discourage them from pur­ gated authority). International will guarantee the pay­ chasing such debt securities. ment of principal, premium, if any, in­ Upon conversion of the Bonds into [ seal] O rval L. DuBois, terest and sinking fund payments on the shares of common stock of International, Secretary. Bonds. The Bonds will be convertible the applicant will register such shares [F.R. Doc. 66-1988; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; at any time on and after August 1, 1967, under the Securities Act of 1933. 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3146 NOTICES

PINAL COUNTY DEVELOPMENT these proceedings for oral hearing, if any, thority in MC 2567 to transport com­ ASSOCIATION will be by Commission order which will modities which because of size or weight be served on each party of record. require special equipment. If a hearing Order Suspending Trading The publications hereinafter set forth is deemed necessary, applicant requests F ebruary 17,1966. reflect the scope of the applications as it be held at Washington, D.C., or New filed by applicants, and may include de­ York, N.Y. It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ scriptions, restrictions, or limitations No. MC 2900 (Sub-No. 124), filed Feb­ change Commission that the summary which are not in a form acceptable to the ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: RYDER suspension of trading in the 5% percent Commission. Authority which ulti­ TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box Industrial Development Revenue Bonds mately may be granted as a result of the 8418, Greensboro, N.C., 27410. Appli­ of Pinal County Development Associa­ applications here noticed will not neces­ cant’s representative: Reagan Sayers, tion due April 15, 1989, otherwise than sarily reflect the phraseology set forth in Century Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., on a national securities exchange is re­ the application as filed, but also will elim­ 76102. Authority sought to operate as quired in the public interest and for the inate any restrictions which are not ac­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, protection of investors; ceptable to the Commission. over irregular routes, transporting: Alu­ It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15 No. MC 1630 (Sub-No. 8) , filed Feb­ minum sulphate, in bhlk, in tank vehi­ (c)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act ruary 7, 1966. Applicant; D. D. JONES cles, from Naheola, Ala., to points in of 1934 that trading in such bonds be Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, summarily suspended, this order to be ef­ TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE COM­ PANY, INCORPORATED, 225 West and Tennessee. N o te: If a hearing is fective for the period February 18, 1966, Main Street, Norfolk, Va. Applicant’s deemed necessary, applicant -requests it through February 27, 1966, both dates representative: Morton E. Kiel, 140 Ce­ be held at New Orleans, La. inclusive. dar Street, New York, N.Y., 10006. Au­ No. MC 3252 (Sub-No. 38), filed Feb­ By the Commission. thority sought to operate as a common ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: PAUL E. MERRILL, doing business as MERRILL [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Secretary. routes, transporting: Such commodities, TRANSPORT CO., 1037 Forest Avenue, as are dealt in by gasoline service stations Portland, Maine. Applicant’s represent­ [F.R. Doc. 66-1989; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; (except commodities in bulk), between ative: Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 536 Gran­ 8:47 a.m.] Chesapeake and Norfolk, Va., on the one ite Street, Braintree, Mass., 02184. Au­ hand, and, on the other, points on the thority sought to operate as a common Delmarva Peninsula in Delaware and carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular INTERSTATE COMMERCE Maryland, south of the Intracoastal wa­ routes, transporting: (1) Petroleum terway of C & D Canal. N ote : If a hear­ products, in bulk, in tank vehicles (ex­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ cept those which are classified as acids COMMISSION quests it be held at Norfolk, Va. and chemicals in Appendix XV in De­ [Notice 883] No. MC 2392 (Sub-No. 48), filed Febru­ scription in Motor Carrier Certificates, ary 7, 1966. Applicant: WHEELER 61 M.C.C. 209), (2) liquified petroleum MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER gas, and (3) liquid petroleum base as­ CARRIER AND FREIGHT FOR­ TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., Post Of­ fice Box 432, Genoa, Nebr. Authority phalt, from Albany, and Rensselaer, WARDER APPLICATIONS sought to operate as a common carrier, N.Y., to points in New Hampshire, south F ebruary 18,1966. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, and west of a line beginning at the Ver­ The following applications are gov­ transporting: Fertilizer solutions, in mont-New Hampshire State line, and bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plant- extending along U.S. Highway 4 to junc­ erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the tion U.S. Highway 3, and thence along Commission’s general rules of practice site of the Phillips Petroleum Co., liquid fertilizer plant .at or near Aurora, Nebr., U.S. Highway 3 to the New Hampshire- (49 CFR 1.247), published in the F ederal Massachusetts State line including R egister, issue of December 3, 1963, ef­ to points in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing is points on the indicated portions of the fective January 1,1964. These rules pro­ highways specified. N ote: Applicant vide, among other things, that a protest deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr. states any duplicating authority to be to the granting of an application must be eliminated. If a hearing is deemed nec­ filed with the Commission within 30 days No. MC 2567 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb­ essary, applicant requests it be held at after date of notice of filing of the appli­ ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: BELBEY Albany, N.Y. cation is published in the F ederal R eg­ TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, No. MC 3560 (Sub-No. 27), filed Feb­ ister. Failure seasonably to file a pro­ 520 Belleville Turnpike, Kearny, N.J. ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: GENERAL test will be construed as a waiver of op­ Applicant’s representative: Morton E. EXPRESSWAYS, INC., 1205 South position and participation in the pro­ Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y., Platte River Drive, Denver, Colo., 80223. ceeding. A protest under these rules 10006. Authority sought to operate as Applicant’s representative: O. Russell should comply with § 1.40 of the general a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Jones, 207 Bokum Building, 142 West rules of practice which requires that it over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Palace Avenue, Santa Fe, N. Mex., 87501. set forth specifically the grounds upon Such commodities, new or used, which Authority sought to operate as a common which it is made and specify with partic­ because of size or weight require the use carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular ularity the facts, matters, and things re­ of special equipment, (2) such commodi­ routes, transporting: Commodities of un­ lied upon, but shall not include issues ties, new or used, which do not require usual value (except those which shipper or allegations phrased generally. Pro­ special equipment because of size or requires carrier to furnish armed guards tests not in reasonable compliance with weight, when moving in the same ship­ or armored equipment), (1) serving Chi­ the requirements of the rules may be re­ ment or the same vehicle with commodi­ cago Heights, 111., and points in Illinois jected. The original and six (6) copies ties, new or used, requiring the use of spe­ within 5 miles of Chicago Heights, as off- of the protest shall be filed with the cial equipment, (a) between New York, route points in connection with carrier’s Commission, and a copy shall be served N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, authorized regular route operations to concurrently upon applicant’s represent­ Newark and Harilson, N.J., and points and from Chicago, 111.; (2) between Bos­ ative, or applicant if no representative is within three (3) miles of Harrison, N.J., ton, Mass., and Washington, D.C.: From named. If the protest includes a request ancTTb) between points in New Jersey, Boston over U.S. Highway 1 to junction on the one hand, and, on the other, Fall Alternate U.S. Highway 1 (formerly for oral hearing, such request shall meet River, New Bedford, and Taunton, Mass., the requirements of § 1.247(d) (4) of the portion U.S. Highway 1), near'Wickford, points in Connecticut, and Rhode Is­ R.I., thence over Alternate U.S. Highway special rule. Subsequent assignment of land, points in that part of New York, 1 to junction U.S. Highway 1, near Wake­ 1 Copies of Special Rule 1.247 can be ob­ on and east of New York Highway 14, field, R.I., thence over U.S. Highway 1 tained by writing to the Secretary, Interstate and points in that part of Pennsylvania to Poquonock Bridge, Conn., thence over Commerce Commission, W ashington, D.C., east of the Susquehanna River. N o te: unnumbered highway via Groton, Conn., 20423. Applicant states it presently holds au­ to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 1, at

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3147 or near New London, Conn., thence over to Jersey City, N.J., thence over U.S. ted; and Pawtucket, Providence, East Alternate U.S. Highway 1 to junction Highway 9 to junction U.S. Highway 9W. Providence, Narragansett, and Westerly, U.S. Highway 1. at or near East Lyme, Thence over U.S. Highway 9W to R.I., for traffic other than that moving to Conn. Albany, and return over the same route; or from points in that part of Massachu­ Thence over U.S. Highway 1 via Phila­ (13) between Stratford, Conn., and setts on and east of Massachusetts High­ delphia, Pa., to Washington (also from Canaan, Conn.; From Stratford over way 12; and the intermediate and off- Philadelphia over U.S. Highway 13 to Connecticut Highway 110 to Shelton, route points within 15 miles of Boston, junction U.S. Highway 40, thence over Conn., thence over Connecticut Highway Mass., those within 5 miles of Spring- U.S. Highway 40 to Baltimore, Md., 8 to Winsted, Conn., thence over U.S. field, Mass., those within 10 miles of thence over U.S. Highway 1 to Washing­ Highway 44 to Canaan, and return over Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, and ton), and return over the same routes; the same route; (14) between Boston, Bridgeport, Conn., those on Long Island, (3) between Boston, Mass., and junction Mass., and Worcester, Mass.: From N.Y., those in New York and New Jersey Massachusetts Highway 12 and U.S. Boston over Massachusetts Highway 9 within 25 miles of New York, N.Y., those Highway 20: From Boston over Massa­ to Worcester, and return over the same in Pennsylvania and New Jersey within chusetts Highway 2 to junction Massa­ route; (15) between Providence, R.I., 15 miles of Philadelphia, Pa., and those chusetts Highway 2A, near East Acton, and Groton, Conn.: From Providence within 5 miles of Baltimore, Md. Service Mass., thence over Massachusetts High­ over Rhode Island Highway 3 (portion in connection with the above-specified way 2A via Littleton Common, Littleton, formerly unnumbered highway) via regular route operations (in 1-16 above) Ayer, and Lunenburg, Mass., to Fitch­ Wyoming, Hope Valley, and Hopkinton, is not authorized between New York, burg, Mass., thence over Massachusetts R.I., to junction Interstate Highway 95 N.Y., and points in New York within 25 Highway 12 to junction U.S. Highway 20, (formerly portion Rhode Island High­ miles of New York, N.Y., on the one and return over the same route; (4) be­ way 3), thence over Interstate Highway hand, and, on the other, authorized New tween Westfield, Mass., and Albany, N.Y.: 95 to the Rhode Island-Connecticut Jersey points, Wilmington, Del., and From Westfield over U.S. Highway 20 to State line, thence over Connecticut Philadelphia, Pa., and points within 15 Albany, and return over the same route; Highway 95 (formerly Connecticut High­ miles of Philadelphia; or between Wil­ (5) between Norwalk, Conn., and Lenox, way 84) to Groton, and return over the mington, Del., on the one hand, and, on Mass.: From Norwalk over U.S. Highway same route; (16) between Great Bar­ the other, Philadelphia, Pa., and points 7 to Lenox, and return over the same rington, Mass., and Valatie, N.Y.: From within 15 miles of Philadelphia; (17) route; (6) between Milldale, Conn., and Great Barrington over Massachusetts between Chicago, 111., and Niagara Falls, Waterbury, Conn.: From Milldale over Highway 23 to junction Massachusetts N.Y.: (a) From Chicago over U.S. High­ Alternate U.S. Highway 6 to Waterbury, Highway 71, thence over Massachusetts way 20 to junction Ohio Highway 120, and return over the same route; (7) be­ Highway 71 to the Massachusetts-New thence over Ohio Highway 120 to Toledo, tween Hartford, Conn., and Winsted, York State line, thence over New York Ohio. Conn.: From Hartford over U.S. Highway Highway 71 to Green River, N.Y., thence Thence over Ohio Highway 2 to 44 to Winsted, and return over the same over New York Highway 22 to Austerlitz, Lorain, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway route; (8) between Albany, N.Y., and N.Y. 57 to junction Ohio Highway 254, thence Camillus, N.Y.: From Albany over New Thence over New York Highway 203 to over Ohio Highway 254 to Cleveland, York Highway 5 to Camillus, and return Valatie, and return over the same route; Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to over the same route; (9) between Bos­ serving intermediate and off-route points junction U.S. Highway 62, thence over ton, Mass., and New Haven, Conn.: From in connection with the above-specified U.S. Highway 62 to Buffalo, N.Y., thence Boston over U.S. Highway 20 to Spring- regular route operations as follows: In­ over New York Highway 384 to Niagara field, Mass. termediate points of Chester, Marlboro, Falls, and return over the same route; Thence over U.S. Highway 5 to Hart­ North Attleboro, Palmer, Pittsfield, Rus­ (b) from Chicago to Buffalo as specified ford, Conn., thence over unnumbered sell, Springfield, Westfield, and Woro- above, thence over New York Highway highway to junction U.S. Highway 5, noco, Mass.; Bridgeport, Hartford, New 266 to Niagara Falls, and return over the thence over UJ5. Highway 5 to New Haven, and Waterbury, Conn.; Trenton, same route, serving all intermediate Haven, and return over the same route; N.J.; Philadelphia and Marcus Hook, Pa.; points, and the off-route points of Ross- (10) between Providence, R.I., and Wilmington, Del.; Baltimore, Elkton, ford, Ohio, in (a) and (b) above; (18) Peekskill, N.Y.: Prom Providence over Laurel, and Hyattsville, Md.; Albany, between Lorain, Ohio, and Akron, Ohio: U.S. Highway 6 to Willimantic, Conn., Amsterdam, Fayetteville, Frankfort, From Lorain over Ohio Highway 57 to thence over Connecticut Highway 32 to Little Falls, Rensselaer, Schenectady, Elyria, Ohio, thence over unnumbered junction Connecticut Highway 31, thence Scotia, Sherrill, Solvay, Syracuse, and highway (formerly portion Ohio High­ over Connecticut Highway 31 via South Utica, N.Y.; those on that portion of the way 57) to junction Ohio Highway 57, Coventry, Conn., to junction Alternate route between Boston, Mass., and Wash­ at or near Laporte, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 44, at or near Coventry, ington, D.C., extending from Westerly, Ohio Highway 57 to Medina, Ohio, thence Conn., thence over Alternate U.S. High­ R.I., over U.S. Highway 1 to unnumbered over Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and re­ way 44 to junction U.S. Highway 44, highway, thence over unnumbered high­ turn over the same route, serving all in­ thence over U.S. Highway 44 to Hart­ way to Alternate U.S. Highway 1, thence termediate points; (19) between Cleve­ ford, Conn., thence over Connecticut over Alternate U.S. Highway 1 to U.S. land, Ohio, and Akron, Ohio: (a) From Highway 4 to junction Connecticut Highway 1, and thence over U.S. High­ Cleveland over Ohio Highway 176 (for­ Highway 10, thence over Connecticut way 1 to Penns Neck, N.J.; those on that merly portion U.S. Highway 21) to junc­ Highway 10 to junction Connecticut portion of the route between Boston, tion unnumbered highway (formerly Highway 72, thence over Connecticut Mass., and New Haven, Conn., extending portion U.S. Highway 21), at or near Highway 72 to junction U.S. Highway 6, from Springfield, Mass., over U.S. High­ Ghent, Ohio, thence over unnumbered thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Peekskill, way 5 to Hartford, Conn. highway to Montrose, Ohio, thence over and return over the same route; (11) Thence over unnumbered highway to Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and return between Springfield, Mass., and New U.S. Highway 5, and thence over U.S. over the same route; (b) from Cleveland Haven, Conn.: From Springfield over Highway 5 to New Haven, Conn.; those to Ghent, Ohio, as specified above. U.S. Highway 20 to Westfield, Mass., on that portion of the route between Thence over Ohio Highway 176 to thence over Massachusetts Highway 10 Providence, R.I., and Peekskill, N.Y., ex­ junction Ohio Highway 18, thence over to Massachusetts-Connecticut State tending from junction Connecticut High­ Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and return line, thence over Connecticut Highway way 31 (formerly portion Alternate U.S. over the same route, serving all inter­ 10 to New Haven, and return over the Highway 6) and Alternate U.S. Highway mediate points in (a) and (b) above; same route; (12) between New York, 44 over Alternate U.S. Highway 44 to (20) between Buffalo, N.Y., and James­ junction U.S. Highway 44; and those on town, N.Y.; from Buffalo over U.S. High­ N.Y., and Albany, N.Y.: (a) From New thé authorized portions of U.S. Highways York over U.S. Highway 9 to Albany, way 62 to junction U.S. Highway 20, 6, 7, 9, 9W, 44, and 202, Massachusetts thence over U.S. Highway 20 to Silver and return over the same route; (b) Highways 2, 2A, and 12, and Connecticut Creek, N.Y., thence over New York High­ from New York across the Hudson River Highways 4, 8,10, 72, and 110, unrestric­ way 5 to Dunkirk, N.Y., thence over New

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No. 38- 3148 NOTICES

York Highway 60 to Jamestown, and re­ A, thence over County Highway A to junction New Jersey Highway 28 and turn over the same route, serving all in­ Hopkinton, Iowa, thence over Iowa High­ U.S. Highway 1 near Elizabeth, N.J.: termediate points; (21) between Mar­ way 38 via Delaware, Iowa, to Greeley, From Canton over U.S. Highway 30 to shalltown, Iowa, and Cedar Rapids, Iowa, thence over County Highway E to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike near Iowa: From Marshalltown over unnum­ Edgewood, Iowa, thence over Iowa High­ Irwin, Pa., thence over Pennsylvania bered highway to junction U.S. Highway way 3 via Strawberry Point, Iowa, to Turnpike to junction U.S. Highway 11, 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junc­ junction Iowa Highway 154, thence over thence over U.S. Highway 11 to Harris­ tion Iowa Highway 146, thence over Iowa Highway 154 to junction Iowa burg, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 22 Iowa Highway 146 to junction unnum­ Highway 150, thence over Iowa Highway to junction unnumbered highway near bered highway, thence over unnumbered 150 via Maynard, Iowa, to Cedar Rapids, Paxtonia, Pa. highway via Montour, Iowa, to Tama, and thence return over the same route* Thence over unnumbered highway via Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to serving all intermediate points and the Paxtonia, Manadahill, Grantville, East junction Iowa Highway 212, thence over off-route point of Rowley, Iowa; (26) be­ Hanover, Jonestown, and Fredericks­ Iowa Highway 212 to Belle Plaine, Iowa, tween Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and junction burg, Pa., to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence over Iowa Highway 131 to junc­ Iowa Highway 21 and U.S. Highway 30: thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junc­ tion unnumbered highway, thence over From Cedar Rapids over County High­ tion unnumbered highway near Bethel, unnumbered highway to Luzerne, Iowa, way M via Palo, Iowa to Shellsburg, Iowa, Pa., thence over unnumbered highway thence over unnumbered highway to thence over Iowa Highway 202 to junc­ via Bethel and Strausstown, Pa., to junc­ junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over tion U.S. Highway 218, thence over U.S. tion U.S. Highway 22, thence over U.S. U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa High­ Highway 218 to Vinton, Iowa, thence Highway 22 to junction unnumbered way 200, thence over Iowa Highway 200 over County Highway K to Garrison, highway near Walbert, Pa., thence over to junction Iowa Highway 199, thence Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 198 to unnumbered highway via Allentown, over Iowa Highway 199 to Van Horne, junction U.S. Highway 218, thence over Bethlehem, Butztown, and Wilson, Pa., Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 82 to U.S. Highway 218 to junction Iowa High­ to Easton, Pa., thence over U.S. High­ Blairstown, Iowa, thence over unnum­ way 8, thence west over Iowa Highway 8 way 22 to junction unnumbered highway bered highway via Watkins, Iowa, to to Traer, Iowa, thence return over Iowa (formerly portion U.S. Highway 22), Norway, Iowa, thence over Iowa High­ Highway 8 to junction County Highway thence over unnumbered highway to way 201 to junction U.S. Highway 30, C, thence over County Highway C to Clinton, N.J., thence over unnumbered thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Vining, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highway via Annandale, Lebanon, Pot- Iowa Highway 280. highway to Elberon, Iowa, thence over terstown, and Whitehouse, N.J., to junc­ Thence over Iowa Highway 280 to New- Iowa Highway 171 to junction Iowa tion U.S. Highway 22, thence over U.S. hall, Iowa, thence over unnumbered Highway 21, thence over Iowa Highway Highway 22 to junction New Jersey highways via Atkins, Iowa, to Cedar 21 to junction U.S. Highway 30, and re­ Highway 28, thence over New Jersey Rapids, and return over the same route, turn over the same route, serving all in­ Highway 28 to junction U.S. Highway 1 serving all intermediate points; (22) be­ termediate points; (27) between Stan- near Elizabeth, N.J., and return over tween Marshalltown, Iowa, and Moline* wood, Iowa, and Clinton, Iowa: From the same route, serving no intermediate 111.; From Marshalltown over route spec­ Stanwood over U.S. Highway 30 to Clin­ points; (34) between Canton, Ohio, and ified immediately above to Tama, Iowa, ton, and return over the same route* junction U.S. Highways 322 and 1 near thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Cedar serving no intermediate points; (28) be­ Chadds Ford, Pa.: From Canton to Har­ Rapids, Iowa, thence over unnumbered tween Cleveland, Ohio, and Canton, risburg as specified in (33) above, thence highway to junction Iowa Highway 150 Ohio: From Cleveland over U.S. Highway over U.S. Highway 230 to Lancaster, Pa., (formerly Iowa Highway 94), thence over 422 to junction Ohio Highway 8. thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa Highway 150 to junction U.S. High­ Thence over Ohio Highway 8 to Can­ Business Route U.S. Highway 30 (for­ way 30 at or near Mount Vernon, Iowa, ton* and return over the same route, merly portion U.S. Highway 30). thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Stan- serving the intermediate points of Shak­ Thence over Business Route U.S. wood, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway er Heights, Warrensville, Bedford, Highway 30 to Downingtown, Pa., thence 38 to Tipton, Iowa, thence over Iowa Northfield, Boston Heights, Uniontown, over U.S. Highway 322 to junction U.S. Highway 150 to Davenport, Iowa, thence Greentown, and North Canton, Ohio, Highway 1 near Chadds Ford, Pa., and over U.S. Highway 6 to Moline, and re­ and the off-route points of Louisville and return over the same route, serving no turn over the same route, serving all in­ Alliance, Ohio; (29) between Cleveland, intermediate points; Restriction: Routes termediate points, and off-route points Ohio, and Edinburg, Ohio: From Cleve­ (33) and (34) above shall be subject to in the Davenport-Rock Island and Mo­ land over Ohio Highway 14 to Edinburg, restrictions as follows: (1) That carrier line commercial zone, as defined by the and return over the same route, serving in operating over the Pennsylvania Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (23) be­ the intermediate points of Maple Turnpike shall handle only traffic which tween Marshalltown, Iowa and Des Heights, Bedford, and Ravenna, Ohio; is moving between points in Massachu­ Moines, Iowa: From Marshalltown over (30) between Cleveland, Ohio, and junc­ setts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Iowa highway 330 to junction unnum­ tion U.S. Highway 422 and Ohio High­ the metropolitan area of New York, N.Y., bered highway (formerly portion U.S. way 91: From Cleveland over U.S. High­ including Jersey City, Newark, and Highway 30), thence over unnumbered way 422 to junction Ohio Highway 91, Elizabeth, N.J.,. on the one hand, and, highway via State Center, Iowa, to junc­ and return over the same route, serving on the other, points west of the Ohio- tion U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. the intermediate point of Shaker Iridiana State line and points in Ohio Highway 30 to Ames, Iowa, thence over Heights, Ohio; (31) between Akron, north of U.S. Highway 30 and Lima, U.S. Highway 69 to Des Moines, and re­ Ohio, and junction Ohio Highway 91 Ohio, on U.S. Highway 30; or that which turn over the same route, serving all in­ and U.S. Highway 20 near Willoughby, is moving between points south of Eliza­ termediate points, and all off-route Ohio: From Akron over Ohio Highway beth, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the points within twelve (12) miles of the 91 to junction U.S. Highway 322, thence other, points west of the Illinois-Indiana Central Post Office, Des Moines, Iowa, over U.S. Highway 322 to South Euclid, State line, including Gary, Ind., and (2) except Altoona, Ankeny, Carlisle, and Ohio, thence return over U.S. Highway that authority applicable to the two said Norwalk, Iowa; (24) between Davenport, 322 to junction Ohio Highway 91, thence routes shall continue only so long as Iowa, and Bettendorf, Iowa: From Dav­ over Ohio Highway 91, to junction U.S. carrier shall, by reason of other au­ enport over U.S. Highway 67 to Betten­ Highway 20 near Willoughby, Ohio, and thority granted, be entitled or author­ dorf, and return over the same route, return over the same route, serving the ized to operate over other routes between serving from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, over intermediate points of Tallmadge, the termini of the said above specified loop route to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, all in­ Twinsburg, and South Euclid, Ohio; (32) two routes; (35) between Chicago, 111., termediate points; (25) from Cedar between Massillon, Ohio, and Canton, and Fort Wayne, Ind.: (a) from Chicago Rapids over U.S. Highway 151 via Mar­ Ohio: From Massillon over U.S. High­ over U.S. Highway 12 to Michigan City, ion, Iowa, to junction Iowa Highway 13. way 30 to Canton, and return over the Ind., thence over U.S. Highway 35 to La Thence over Iowa Highway 13 via Cog- same route, serving no intermediate Porte, Ind., thence over Indiana High­ gon, Iowa, to junction County Highway points; (3) between Canton, Ohio, and way 2 to South Bend, Ind., thence over

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3149

U.S. Highway 33 to Fort Wayne, and thence over unnumbered highway via Illinois Highway 29 (formerly portion return over the same route, (b) from Dwight, 111., to junction U.S. Highway 66, U.S. Highway 6), near Spring Valley, 111., Chicago over U.S. Highway 20 to junc­ thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction thence over Illinois Highway 29 via tion U.S. Highway 421, thence over U.S. unnumbered highway, near Odell, 111., Depue, 111., to junction unnumbered high­ Highway 421 to Michigan City, Ind. thence over unnumbered highway via way (formerly portion U.S. Highway 6), Thence to Fort Wayne as specified Odell, 111., to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over unnumbered highway to above, and return over the same route, thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction junction U.S. Highway 6. serving no intermediate points in (a) unnumbered highway, near Pontiac, 111., Thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Shef­ and (b) above; (36) between Fort thence over unnumbered highway to field. HI., thence over unnumbered high­ Wayne, Ind., and Toledo, Ohio: (a) Junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over way to Buda, and return over the same From Fort Wayne over Indiana Highway U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnum­ route, serving the intermediate points 37 to the Indiana-Ohio State line, thence bered highway, near Chenoa, 111., thence of Chicago and Zion, 111., Racine and over Ohio Highway 2 via .Hicksville, over unnumbered highway via Chenoa, Kenosha, Wis., and those between Chi­ Ohio, to junction U.S. Highway 127 111., to junction U.S. Highway 66. cago and Buda, 111., and the off-route (formerly portion Ohio Highway 2), at Thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junc­ points of Cudahy, Fox Point, Greendale, or near Bryan, Ohio, thence over U.S. tion unnumbered highway, near Lexing­ West Milwaukee, Shorewood, Wauwa­ Highway 127 to junction unnumbered ton, 111., thence over unnumbered high­ tosa, West Allis, and Whitefish Bay, Wis.; highway (formerly portion Ohio High­ way to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence (45) between Moline, 111., and Des way 2) near Pulaski, Ohio, thence over over U.S. Highway 66 to Bloomington, Moines, Iowa: From Moline over U.S. unnumbered highway to junction Ohio and return over the same route, serving Highway 6 to junction Iowa Highway 90 Highway 2, at or near Stryker, Ohio, all intermediate points; (40) between (formerly portion U.S. Highway 6), thence over Ohio Highway 2 to Toledo, Moline, 111., and Bloomington, 111., from thence over Iowa Highway 90 to Des and return over the same route; (b) Moline over U.S. Highway 150 to Bloom­ Moines, and return over the same route, from Fort Wayne to Hicksville, Ohio, as ington, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points and off- specified in (a) above, thence over Ohio serving all intermediate points, and off- route points in the Davenport-Rock Is­ Highway 18 to junction U.S. Highway route points in the Davenport-Rock Is­ land and Moline commercial zone as de­ 127, thence over U.S. Highway 127 to land and Moline, commercial zone as de­ fined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. West Unity, Ohio, thence over unnum­ fined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557, and those within twelve (12) miles bered highway to Alvordton, Ohio, 557; (41) between Sterling, 111., and Ful­ of the Central Post Office, Des Moines, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junction ton, 111.: From Sterling over U.S. High­ Iowa, except Altoona, Ankeny, Carlisle, Ohio Highway 120, thence over Ohio way 30 to junction Alternate U.S. High­ and Norwalk, Iowa; (46) between Chi­ Highway 120 to Toledo, and return over way 30 (formerly portion U.S. Highway cago, 111., and Milwaukee, Wis.: From the same route, (c) from Fort Wayne over 30), thence over Alternate U.S. Highway Chicago over Illinois Highway 21 to U.S. Highway 27 to Waterloo, Ind., thence 30 to Fulton, and return over the same junction Illinois Highway 83 (formerly over U.S. Highway 6 to junction Ohio route, serving all intermediate points; portion Illinois Highway 21), thence over Highway 192, thence over Ohio High­ (42) between Peoria, 111., and South Pe­ Illinois Highway 83 to the Illinois-Wis­ way 192 to Bryan, Ohio, thence over U.S. kin, 111.: From Peoria over Illinois High­ consin State line, thence over Wiscon­ Highway 127 to junction U.S. Highway way 29 to South Pekin, and return over sin Highway 83 to junction ‘Wisconsin 20, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junc­ the same route, serving all intermediate Highway 75, thence over Wisconsin High­ tion Ohio Highway 120, thence over points; (43) between Chicago, 111., and way 75 to junction Wisconsin Highway Ohio Highway 120 to Toledo, and return Muscatine, Iowa: From Chicago over Al­ 20 near Beaumont, Wis., thence over over the same route, serving all inter­ ternate U.S. Highway 30 to Dixon, 111., Wisconsin Highway 20 to junction U.S. mediate points, and the off-route points thence over unnumbered highway via Highway 45, thence over U.S. Highway of Pioneer and Kunkle, Ohio; (37) be­ Prairieville, 111., to junction Alternate 45 to Durham, Wis., thence over Wiscon­ tween Chicago, 111., and Fort Wayne, U.S. Highway 30, thence over Alternate sin Highway 36 to Milwaukee, and return Ind.: From Chicago over U.S. Highway U.S. Highway 30 to Sterling, 111., thence over the same route, serving all inter­ 41 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over Illinois Highway 2 to Silvis, 111., mediate points, and the off-route points over U.S. Highway 30 to junction un­ thence over Illinois Highway 92 to junc­ of Cudahy, Fox Point, Greendale, West numbered highway, near Winona Lake, tion U.S. Highway 6, thence over U.S. Milwaukee, Shorewood, Wauwatosa, Ind., thence over unnumbered highway Highway 6 to Davenport, Iowa. West Allis, and Whitefish Bay, Wis.; via Lorane, Ind., to Columbia City, Ind. Thence over U.S. Highway 67 to junc­ (47) between points in New York as fol­ Thence over unnumbered highway tion Illinois Highway 92, thence over lows: (a) From Buffalo over New York (formerly portion U.S. Highway 30) to Illinois Highway 92 to junction Illinois Highway 5 to Albany, and return over junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over Highway 192, thence over Illinois High­ the same route; (b) from Batavia over U.S. Highway 30 to Fort Wayne, and re­ way 192 via Taylor Ridge and Edgington, New York Highway 33 to Rochester. turn over the same route, serving no in­ 111., to junction Illinois Highway 92, Thence over New York Highway 31 termediate points; (38) between Chi­ thence over Illinois Highway 92 to the to Weedsport, and thence over New York cago, 111., and Moline, 111.: From Chicago Mississippi River, thence across the Mis­ Highway 3IB to junction New York over U.S. Highway 34 to junction Illinois sissippi River to Muscatine, and return Highway 5, and return over the same Highway 65, thence over Illinois High­ over the same route, serving all inter­ route; (c) from Herkimer over New York way 65 to Aurora, 111., thence over Illinois mediate points, the off-route point of Highway 28 to Middleville, thence over Highway 31 to Oswego, 111., thence over Grandview, Iowa, and those in the New York Highway 29 to Johnstown, U.S. Highway 34 to Princeton, 111., thence Davenport-Rock Island and Moline thence over New York Highway 30A over U.S. Highway 6 to Briarbluff, 111., commercial zone, as defined by the Com­ (formerly New York Highway 148) to thence over Illinois Highway 84 to Silvis, mission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (44) between Fonda, and return over the same route; 111., thence over Illinois Highway 92 to Milwaukee, Wis., and Buda, 111.: From (d) from Oswego over New York High­ Moline, and return over the same route, Milwaukee over unnumbered highway to way 57 to Syracuse, and return over the serving all intermediate points, and the junction Wisconsin Highway 100, thence same route; (e) from junction New off-route points in the Davenport-Rock over Wisconsin Highway 100 to junc­ York Highways 5 and 78 over New York Island and Moline commercial zone as tion Wisconsin Highway 32, thence over Highway 78 to Lockport, and return over defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. Wisconsin Highway 32 to the Wisconsin- the same route; (f) from Batavia over 557; (39) between Chicago, 111., and Illinois State line, thence over Illinois New York Highway 63 to Pavilion, and Bloomington, 111.: From Chicago over Highway 42 to junction Illinois Highway return over the same route; (g) from U.S.. Highway 66 to junction Alternate 173, thence over Illinois Highway 173 to Utica over New York Highway 49 to U.S. Highway 66, thence over Alternate junction U.S. Highway 41, thence over Rome, and return over the same route; U.S. Highway 66 to Gardner, 111., thence U.S. Highway 41 to Chicago, 111., thence (h) from Albany over New York High­ over U.S. Highway 66 to junction un­ over Illinois Highway 4A to Joliet, 111., way 32 to junction New York Highway numbered highway, near Dwight, 111., thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction 7, thence over New York Highway 7 to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3150 NOTICES

Troy, and return over the same route, Illinois Highway 173 and U.S. Highway tion: Routes (A) and (B) above shall be serving all intermediate points in (a) 41: From Milwaukee over U.S. Highway subject to restrictions as follows: through (h) above; (48) between Buf­ 41 to junction Illinois Highway 173, and (1) That carrier in operating over the falo, N.Y., and Batavia, N.Y.: Prom return over the same route, serving no Pennsylvania Turnpike shall handle only Buffalo over New York Highway 33 to intermediate points or termini except as traffic which is moving between points Batavia, and return over the same route, otherwise authorized; (55) between in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Con­ serving no intermediate points; (49) be* Toledo, Ohio, and Cleveland, Ohio: From necticut, and the metropolitan area of tween junction New York Highway 5 and Toledo over Ohio Highway 120 to junc­ New York, N.Y., including Jersey City, New York Highway 365A, and Schenec­ tion Ohio Highway 51, thence over Ohio Newark, and Elizabeth, N.J., on the one tady, N.Y..\ Prom junction New York Highway 51 to junction U.S. Highway hand, and, on the other, points west of Highway 5 and New York Highway 365A, 20 near Gibsonburg Junction, Ohio, the Ohio-Indiana State line and points near Oneida, N.Y., over New York High­ thence over U.S. Highway 20 to Cleve­ in Ohio north of U.S. Highway 30 and way 365A to Oneida, N.Y. land, and return over the same route, Lima, Ohio, on U.S. Highway 30; or Thence over New York Highway 365 to serving no intermediate points; (56) be­ that which is moving between points Rome, N.Y., thence over New York High­ tween Sandusky, Ohio, and Medina, south of Elizabeth, N.J., on the one hand, way 69 to Utica, N.Y., and thence over Ohio: and, on the other, points west of the New York Highway 5S to Schenectady, From Sandusky over U.S. Highway 250 Ulinois-Indiana State line, including and return over the same route, serving to Norwalk, Ohio, thence over Ohio High­ Gary, Ind., (2) that authority applicable no intermediate points; (50) between way 18 to Medina, and return over the to the said routes shall continue only so Toledo, Ohio, and Perrysburg, Ohio: same route, serving no intermediate long as carrier or its company affiliates Prom Toledo over U.S. Highway 25 to points; (57) between Bellevue, Ohio, and shall, by reason of other authority grant­ Perrysburg, and return over the same Elyria, Ohio: From Bellevue over Ohio ed, jointly be entitled or authorized to route, serving no intermediate points; Highway 113 to Elyria, and return over operate over other routes between the (51) between Kendallville, Ind., and La­ the same route, serving no intermediate termini of the said above specified routes, grange, Ind.: From Kendallville over points; (58) between Cleveland, Ohio, and (3) that the authority granted here­ U.S. Highway 6 to junction Indiana and junction Ohio Highway 176 and un­ in is restricted to the movement of traffic Highway 9, thence over Indiana High­ numbered highway (formerly portion which originates at or is destined to way 9 to Lagrange, and return over the U.S. Highway 21), near Richfield, Ohio: points west of Kansas City, Mo. N o te: same route, serving all intermediate From Cleveland over U.S. Highway 21 to Applicant states that he intends to tack points. Alternate routes for operating junction unnumbered highway (formerly the authority sought in this application convenience only: (A) Between Chicago, portion U.S. Highway 21), thence over to its presently held authority and also 111., and La Porte, Ind.: From Chicago unnumbered highway to junction Ohio intends to interline with other carriers. over Illinois Highway 1A (formerly Highway 176 near Richfield, and return Applicant also states that he seeks au­ Illinois Highway 1) to junction U.S. over the same route, serving no inter­ thority, in the above proposed operation, Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 mediate points; (59) between Akron, to delete from all of the operating au­ to junction Indiana Highway 2, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to Edinburg, Ohio, thorities granted up to the present time, over Indiana Highway 2 to La Porte, and thence over Ohio Highway 14 to the the exception which reads “those (com­ return over the same route; serving no Ohio-Pennsylvania State line, near East modities) of unusual value” and to add intermediate points, as an alternate Palestine, Ohio, thence over Pennsyl­ the following exception to those certifi­ route for operating convenience only; vania Highway 51 to Pittsburgh, and cates which presently have the “com­ (B) between Des Moines, Iowa, and return over the same route, serving no modities of unusual value” exception: junction Iowa Highway 64 and U.S. intermediate points; Alternate routes for “authority to transport such commodi­ Highway 30: Prom Des Moines over Iowa operating convenience only: (A) Be­ ties except those which shipper requires Highway 64 to junction U.S. Highway 30, tween St. Louis, Mo., and junction Inter­ carrier to furnish armed guards or and return over the same route, serving state Highway 70 and the Pennsylvania armored equipment.” If a hearing is no intermediate points as an alternate Turnpike, near Irwin, Pa.: deemed necessary, applicant requests it route, for operating convenience only; From St. Louis over Interstate High­ be held at Denver, Colo., or Salt Lake (C) between Vining, Iowa, and junction way 70 (also U.S. Highway 40) via Indi­ City, Utah. U.S. Highway 30 and unnumbered high­ anapolis, Ind., to junction Interstate No. MC 4966 (Sub-No. 15), filed Febru­ way about 2 miles south of Vining: Highway 70 and U.S. Highway 40 at or ary^, 1966. Applicant: JONES TRANS­ From Vining over unnumbered high­ near Washington, Pa., thence over Inter­ FER COMPANY, a corporation, 111 way to junction U.S. Highway 30, and state Highway 70 to junction Pennsyl­ Jones Avenue, Monroe, Mich. Appli­ return over the same route, serving no vania Turnpike, and return over the cant’s representative: Frank J. Kerwin, intermediate points, as an alternate same route, in connection with carrier’s Jr., 1800 Buhl Building, Detroit, Mich., route, for operating convenience only; authorized regular route operations over 48226. Authority sought to operate as (52) between junction U.S. Highway 11 the Pennsylvania Turnpike, serving no a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and Interstate Highway 83, located near intermediate points and serving the regular routes, transporting: General Harrisburg, Pa., and Baltimore, Md.: junction of Interstate Highway 70 to commodities (except those of unusual Prom junction U.S. Highway 11 and In­ junction Pennsylvania Turnpike for value, and except dangerous explosives, terstate Highway 83, located near Har­ purpose of joinder only, as an alternate household goods as defined in Practices risburg, over Interstate Highway 83 to route, for operating convenience only; of Motor Common Carriers of Household Baltimore, and return over the same (B) between Springfield, 111., and junc­ Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in route in connection with carrier’s regu­ tion Interstate Highway 70 and the bulk, • commodities requiring special lar route operations, serving no inter­ Pennsylvania Turnpike near Irwin, Pa.: equipment and those injurious or con­ mediate points, and serving junction U.S. From Springfield over U.S. Highway 36 taminating to other lading), (1) between Highway 11 and Interstate Highway 83 tc Indianapolis, Ind., thence over Inter­ Fayette, Ohio, and Morenci, Mich., as for purpose of joinder only; (53) between state Highway 70 (also U.S. Highway 40) follows: From Fayette, over U.S. High­ Chicago, 111., and junction Eden’s Ex­ to junction Interstate Highway 70 and way 20 to junction Ohio Highway 108, pressway and U.S. Highway 41 some­ U.S. Highway 40 at or near Washington, thence over Ohio Highway 108 to what north of Lake Avenue: From Chi­ Pa., thence over Interstate Highway 70 Morenci, and return over the same route, cago over Eden’s Expressway to junction to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike, and serving no intermediate points; and (2) U.S. Highway 41 and return over the return over the same route, in connection between Fayette, Ohio, and Adrian, same route, serving no intermediate with carrier’s regular route operations Mich., as follows: From Fayette, over points, but carrier may join or tack said over the Pennsylvania Turnpike, serving U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio High­ authority over Expressway to authority no intermediate points and serving the way 109, thence over Ohio Highway 109 held over U.S. Highway 41, but it is not junction of Interstate Highway 70 and to the Michigan-Ohio State line, thence to be construed as authorizing service the Pennsylvania Turnpike for purpose over Michigan Highway 52 to Adrian, and at any point not already authorized; (54) of joinder only, as an alternate route return over the same route, serving no between Milwaukee, Wis., and junction for operating convenience only. Restric­ intermediate points. N o te: If a hearing

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3151 No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 168), filed Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 25 (also is deemed necessary, applicant requests it over Interstate Highway 75) through be held at Detroit or Lansing, Mich. February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Dayton, Lima, Findley, and Toledo, Ohio, No. MC 18088 (Sub-No. 43), filed Feb­ to Detroit and return over the same ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: FLOYD & Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought BEASLEY TRANSFER COMPANY, to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ route, serving no intermediate points INC., Post Office Drawer 8, Sycamore, tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ except Cincinnati, Ohio, for the purpose Ala. Applicant’s representative: John porting: Frozen foods, from St. James of interchange with applicant’s wholly and Madelia, Minn., to points in Indi­ owned affiliate Johnson Freight Lines W. Cooper, 805 Title Building, Birming­ Co., Inc., only: (2) Between Indianapolis, ham, Ala. Authority sought to operate ana, Michigan, and Ohio. N o te: If a as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Ind., and Detroit, Mich.; from Indianap­ over irregular routes, transporting: Gen­ requests it be held at Minneapolis, Minn. olis over Indiana Highway 37 to Fort eral commodities (except those of un­ No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 169), filed Wayne, Ind., thence over U.S. Highway usual value, classes A and B explosives, February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS 24 to Toledo, Ohio, thence over Inter­ livestock, household goods as defined by LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, state Highway 75 (also over U.S. High­ the Commission, commodities in bulk, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought way 25) to Detroit and return over the and commodities requiring special equip­ to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ same route, serving no intermediate ment) , between the plantsite of Revere tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ points and serving Indianapolis, Ind., as Copper & Brass, Inc., at or near Scotts- porting: Meat, and meat products, meat a point of joinder with applicant’s pres­ boro, Ala., on the one hand, and, one byproducts, dairy products and articles ently held authority, only; (3) between the other, points in Alabama, Tennessee, distributed by meat packinghouses, as junction U.S. Highways 127 and 24 (ap­ Georgia, and South Carolina. Note: If described in sections A, B, and C of ap­ proximately 12 miles east of Antwerp, a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant pendix I to the report in Descriptions in Ohio), and Jackson, Mich., over U.S. requests it be held at Birmingham JU a. Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. Highway 127, serving no intermediate No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 164), filed Feb­ 209 and 766, from Decatur, Detroit, and points and serving the junction of U.S. ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, Plainwell, Mich., to points in Delaware, Highways 127 and 24 for joinder only; INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshall­ Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West (4) between junction U.S. Highway 30S town, Iowa. Authority sought to oper­ Virginia, and the District of Columbia. and Interstate Highway 75 (at or near ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Lima, Ohio), and junction U.S. Highways hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: applicant requests it be held at Detroit, 127 and 24 (approximately 12 miles east Canned and preserved foodstuff, from Mich. of Antwerp, Ohio); from junction Inter­ Delphos and Van Wert, Ohio, and Hop- No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 170), filed Feb­ state Highway 75 and U.S. Highway 30S peston, HI., to points in Nebraska and ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, (at or near Lima, Ohio), over U.S. High­ Kansas. Note: If a hearing is deemed INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshall­ way 30S to Delphos, Ohio, thence over necessary, applicant requests it be held town, Iowa. Authority sought to op­ U.S. Highway 30 to Van Wert, Ohio. at Minneapolis, Minn. erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ Thence over U.S. Highway 127 to No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 165), filed hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: junction U.S. Highway 24 (approxi­ February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS Frozen foods, from Cleveland, Ohio, to mately 12 miles east of Antwerp, Ohio) LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, points in Illinois (except Chicago and and return over the same route, serving Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought points in its commercial zone), Iowa, no intermediate points and serving all to operate as a common carrier, by motor Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, and junctions for the purpose of joinder vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing is only; (5) between Jackson, Mich., and ing: Dry animal and poultry feed and deemed necessary, applicant requests it Detroit, Mich., over Interstate Highway dry animal and poultry feed ingredients be held at Cleveland, Ohio. 94, serving the ^intermediate points of (except canned animal feeds) and in­ No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 171), filed Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Romulus, and secticides in mixed loads with the com­ February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS Inkster, Mich., and the off-route points modities specified above, from Mount LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, of Willow Run and Wayne, Mich.; (6) Vernon, Ind., to points in Illinois, Indi­ Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought between Lansing, Mich., and Detroit, ana, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee, to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ Mich.; from Lansing over U.S. Highway and rejected shipments, on return. tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ 127 to junction Interstate Highway 96 Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary, porting: Canned or preserved foodstuff, south of Lansing, thence over Interstate applicant requests that it be held at from Delphos and Van Wert, Ohio, to Highway 96 to Detroit and return over Nashville, Tenn. Hoopeston, 111. N o te: If a hearing is the same route, serving no intermediate No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 166), filed deemed necessary, applicant requests it points; (7) between Lansing, Mich., and February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS be held at Minneapolis, Minn. Flint, Mich., over Michigan Highway 78, LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, No. MC 22229 (Sub-No. 39) (Amend­ serving the intermediate points of East Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought ment), filed August 30, 1965, published Lansing and Swartz Creek, Mich.; (8) to operate as a common carrier, by motor F ederal R egister issue of September 15, between Detroit, Mich., and Bay City, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ 1965, amended January 27, 1966, and re­ Mich.; from Detroit over Interstate ing: Foodstuffs, from points in Michigan, published as amended this issue. Appli­ Highway 75 to junction Michigan High­ north of Michigan Highway 21, to points cant: TERMINAL TRANSPORT COM­ way 13 (near Saginaw, Mich.), thence in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin. PANY, INC., 248 Chester Avenue SE., At­ over Michigan Highway 13 to Bay City Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, lanta, Ga. Applicant’s representative: and return over the same route, serving applicant requests it be held at Chicago, Guy H. Postell, Suite 693, 1375 Peach­ the intermediate points of Troy, Pon­ 111. tree Street NE., Atlanta, Ga., 30309. Au­ tiac, Flint, and Saginaw, Mich.; (9) be­ No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 167), filed thority sought to operate as a common tween Midland, Mich., and Saginaw, February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Mich.; from Midland over Michigan LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, routes, transporting: General commodi­ Highway 47 to junction Michigan High­ Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought ties (except those of unusual value, way 46 (west of Saginaw). to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ classes A and B explosives, livestock, Thence over Michigan Highway 46 to tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ household goods as defined by the Com­ Saginaw and return over the same route, porting: Lumber, millwork, roofing and mission, commodities in bulk and those serving no intermediate points; (10) be­ materials and supplies used by roofing, requiring special equipment), (1) be­ tween Midland, Mich., and Bay City, building, and paving contractors, from tween Atlanta, Ga., and Detroit, Mich.; Mich., over U.S. Highway 10, serving points in Jackson County, Iowa, and from Atlanta over U.S. Highway 41 (also no intermediate points; (11) between points within ten (10) miles thereof, to over Interstate Highway 75) to Chatta­ junction Michigan Highway 13 and points in Wisconsin and the Upper Pe­ nooga, Tenn., thence over U.S. Highway Interstate Highway 75 (near Saginaw, ninsula of Michigan. Note : If a hearing 27 to junction Interstate Highway 75 Mich.) and junction interstate Highway is deemed necessary, applicant requests at or near Lexington, Ky., thence over 75 and U.S. Highway 10 (approximately it be held at Chicago, 111. Interstate Highway 75 to Cincinnati, 2 miles west of Bay City, Mich.), over

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3152 NOTICES

Interstate Highway 75, serving no inter­ sary, applicant does not specify a loca­ ucts and articles distributed by meat mediate points; and (12) between Jack- tion. packinghouses, as described in sections son, Mich., and Lansing, Mich., over U.S. No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 210), filed A and C of appendix 1 to the report in Highway 127, serving no intermediate February 3,1966. Applicant: KROBLIN Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ points. N ote; Applicant states that it REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except intends to tack the above proposed au­ Office Box 5000, 2125 Commercial Street, hides and commodities in bulk, in tank thority with that authority previously Waterloo, Iowa. Applicant’s repre­ vehicles), from Salina, Kans., to points granted in Certificate No. MC 22229, sentative: Truman A. Stockton, The 1650 in Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hli- wherein applicant is authorized to serve Grant Street Building, Denver, Colo. nois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, points in the States of Florida, Georgia, Authority sought to operate as a com­ Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Alabama. Applicant proposes to regular routes, transporting: Frozen Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Ver­ serve every point it is presently au­ foods, from Detroit, Mich., to points in mont, Wisconsin, and the District of thorized to serve in MC 22229 and all Missouri, Tennessee, Iowa, and Wiscon­ Columbia, restricted to traffic originating subs thereto, except it does not propose sin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed neces­ at the plantsite of the Beverly Packing to operate between the proposed terri­ sary, applicant requests that it be held Co., at or near Salina, Kans. N o te: If tory, on the one hand, and, on the other, at New York, N.Y. a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Chicago, HI., Indianapolis, Ind., and No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 211), filed Feb­ requests it be held at Washington, D.C., Cincinnati, Ohio. Applicant also pro­ ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN or Kansas City, Mo. poses to serve any additional territory REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 215), filed Feb­ over and above that it is authorized to Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN serve direct in the south through inter­ Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s rep­ REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 change with other carriers, and the resentative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, same applies as to points beyond its pro­ The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s rep­ posed authority in Michigan by inter­ 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a resentative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., change with other carriers at points in common carrier, by motor vehicle, over The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver Michigan. The purpose of this republi­ irregular routes, transporting: Candy 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as cation is to add the above note. If a and confectionery, from Pewaukee, Wis., a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over hearing is deemed necessary, applicant to points in Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, irregular routes, transporting: Novelties, requests it be held at Jacksonville, Fla., Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas. Note: decorations, and party goods, from or Detroit, Mich. If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Shippensburg, Pa., to points in Minne­ No. MC 25869 (Sub-No. 59), filed Feb­ cant requests it be held at Milwaukee, sota, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: NOLTE Wis. Oklahoma, and Colorado. N o te: If a BROS. TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 212), filed Feb­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Box 7184, South Omaha-, Nebr. Ap­ ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN requests it be held at Washington, D.C. plicant’s representative: Duane W. Ack- REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 No. MC 49304 (Sub-No. 14), filed Feb­ lie, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: BOWMAN Authority sought to operate as a com­ Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Post mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ representative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., Office Box 6, Stephens City, Va. Appli­ regular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver cant’s representative: Eston H. Alt, Post from the plantsite of American Home 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate Office Box 81, Winchester, Va., 22601. Foods, Inc., at or near La Porte, Ind., to as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Authority sought to operate as a common points in Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and over irregular routes, transporting: Tile, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Colorado. N o te: Common control may floor and wall, mastic, tools, equipment, routes, transporting: Lime and lime­ be involved. If a hearing is deemed nec­ and supplies, used in the installation of stone products (except open hearth essary, applicant does not specify a place tile, floor or wall, from points in Carroll, limestone), from points in Stonewall of hearing. Cuyahoga, Franklin, Muskingum, Stark, Magisterial District, Frederick County, No. MC 30061 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ and Summit Counties, Ohio, and Cook Va., to points in Delaware, District of ruary 8, 1966. Applicant: JOSEPH (except points north of U.S. Highway 6), Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey (ex­ BEDNER, doing business as JOSEPH Grundy, and Kankakee Counties, 111., to cept transportation of such commodities BEDNER TRANSFER LINE, Sun Prairie, points in Nebraska, South Dakota, and in bulk to points in Cumberland, Salem, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Claude Iowa. N o te: If a hearing is deemed Gloucester, Cape May, Atlantic, Cam­ J. Jasper, 111 South Fairchild Street, necessary, applicant requests it be held den, and Burlington Counties, N.J.), Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority sought at Omaha, Nebr. North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, to operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 213), filed Feb­ West Virginia, and points in New York, vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN N.Y., commercial zone as defined by the porting: Water conditioners and ma­ REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post Commission. N o te: If a hearing is terials, equipment and supplies used and Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Appli­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it useful in the production of water con­ cant's representative: Truman A. Stock- be held at Washington, D.C. ditioners, between Madison, and Deer­ ton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, No. MC 50069 (Sub-No. 341), filed Feb­ field, Wis. N ote : If a hearing is deemed Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to op­ ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: REFINERS necessary, applicant requests it be held erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ TRANSPORT & TERMINAL CORPO­ at Madison, Wis. hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ RATION, 930 North York Road, Hins­ No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 209), filed ing: Frozen foods, from Chickasha, dale, HI., 60521. Authority sought to February 3,1966. Applicant: KROBLIN Okla., to points in Indiana and Ohio. operate as a common carrier, by motor REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Ap­ applicant requests that it be held at Dal­ ing: Liquid chemicals, in bulk, in tank plicant’s representative: Truman A. las, Tex. vehicles, from Weston, Mich., and points Stockton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 214), filed Feb­ in Raisin Township, Lenawee County, Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN Mich., to points in niinois, Indiana, Mis­ sought to operate as a common carrier, REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post souri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. N o te: If a by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Appli­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant transporting: Foodstuffs, from Vineland, cant’s representative: Truman A. Stock- requests it be held at Washington, D.C. N.J., to points in Colorado, Illinois, ton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, No. MC 51146 (Sub-No. 32), filed Feb­ Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michi­ Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to op­ ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: SCHNEIDER gan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New erate as a common carrier, by motor TRANSPORT & STORAGE, INC., 817 York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wiscon­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ McDonald Street, Green Bay, Wis. Ap­ sin. N ote : If a hearing is deemed neces­ ing; Meats, meat products, meat "byprod­ plicant’s representative: Charles W.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3153

Singer, 33 North La Salle Street, Chi­ M.C.C. 209 and 766, from points in is restricted against the transportation cago, HI., 60602. Authority sought to Morgan and Logan Counties, Colo., to of steel articles; and (2) machinery, con­ operate as a common carrier, by motor points in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, tractors’ equipment, and steel articles, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Mis­ fabricated beyond the primary state, ing: Cellulose materials, and products; souri. N o te: If a hearing is deemed which do not require special handling or cellulose materials and products joined necessary, applicant requests it be held rigging when moving in the same ship­ to or combined with paper, plastics, syn­ at Denver, Colo. ment or in the same vehicle with heavy thetics, or cloth; sanitary paper and No. MC 55236 (Sub-No. 124), filed Feb­ machinery, contractors’ equipment, or paper products; sanitary paper and pa­ ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: OLSON steel articles which require specialized per products joined to or combined with TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a cor­ handling or rigging, between points in paper, plastics, synthetics or cloth; ma­ poration, 1970 South Broadway, Post that part of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, terials, equipment and supplies used in Office Box 1187, Green Bay, Wis. Au­ Michigan, and Wisconsin within 300 the manufacture and distribution of the thority sought to operate as a common miles of Chicago, 111., including Chicago, above described commodities; and re­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular except that service to and from Kenosha, lated premiums and advertising mate­ routes, transporting: General commodi­ Milwaukee, and Racine, Wis., is re­ rials when shipped with such products, ties (except classes A and B explosives stricted against the transportation of between Cheboygan, Mich., on the one and household goods, as defined by the steel articles. Note: Applicant states hand, and, on the other, points in Boone, Commission), (1) between junction U.S. that it presently holds the authority in Cook, De Kalb, Du Page, Grundy, Iro­ Highway 45 (formerly Wisconsin High­ (1) above and is not requesting any quois, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, way 55) and Fond du Lac County High­ extension of territory. Applicant states La Salle, McHenry, Will, and Winne­ way V, located at Eden, Wis., and that it is seeking only an extension of bago Counties, 111.; Adams, Allen, Ben­ junction U.S. Highway 45 (formerly Wis­ authority in (2) above. If a hearing is ton, Blackford, Boone, Carroll, Cass, consin Highway 55), located near Kewas- deemed necessary, applicant requests it Clinton, De Kalb, Delaware, Elkhart, kum, Wis., over Fond du Lac County be held at Chicago, 111. Payette, Franklin, Fulton, Grant, Ham­ Highway V, serving the intermediate No. MC 75330 (Sub-No. 12) (Amend­ ilton, Hancock, Henry, Howard, Hunt­ point of Campbellsport, Wis.; and (2) ment), filed September 24, 1965, pub­ ington, Jasper, Jay, Kosciusko, Lagrange, between junction U.S. Highway 45 (for­ lished F ederal R egister issue of Decem­ Lake, La Porte, Madison, Marion, Mar­ merly Wisconsin Highway 55) and Wis­ ber 23, 1965, amended January 21, 1966, shall, Miami, Newton, Noble, Porter, consin Highway 67, and Campbellsport, and republished, as amended, this issue. Pulaski, Randolph, Rush, St. Joseph, Wis., over Wisconsin Highway 67, serv­ Applicant: MORRIS DRAYING COM­ Starke, Steuben, Tippecanoe, Tipton, ing no intermediate points. N ote : Appli­ PANY, a corporation, 190 98th Avenue, Union, Wabash, Wayne, Wells, White, cant states that he is presently author­ Oakland, Calif. Applicant’s representa­ and Whitley Counties, Ind.; Allen, Ash­ ized to traverse the above outlined routes tive: Daniel W. Baker, 405 Montgomery land, Ashtabula, Auglaize, Butler, Cham­ and to serve the intermediate point of Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Au­ paign, Clark, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Campbellsport, Wis., as sought in the thority sought to operate as a common Darke, Defiance, Delaware, Erie, Frank­ above proposed operation, restricted, carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular lin, Fulton, Geauga, Greene, Hamilton, however, to the transportation of routes, transporting: General commodi­ Hancock, Hardin, Henry, Huron, Lake, “Cheese, materials, supplies and equip­ ties, (1) between San Francisco and Logan, Lorain, Lucas, Madison, Marion, ment used or useful in the production of Salinas, Calif.: From San Francisco over Medina, Mercer, Miami, Montgomery, cheese.” If a hearing is deemed neces­ U.S. Highway 101 (also from junction Morrow, Ottawa, Paulding, Preble, Put­ sary, applicant requests that it be held U.S. Highway 101 and California High­ nam, Richland, Sandusky, Seneca, Shel­ at Milwaukee, Wis. way 82 at San Francisco, over California by, Summit, Union, Van Wert, Wayne, No. MC 71743 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb- Highway 82 to junction U.S. Highway Williams, Wood, and Wyandot Counties, bruary 2, 1966. Applicant: BELLM 101 at San Jose) to Salinas, (2) between Ohio; points in Michigan, Wisconsin, FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1819 North 17th Salinas and Monterey, Calif., over Cali­ and Kentucky (in the Cincinnati, Ohio Street, St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought fornia Highway 68, (3) between Watson­ commercial zone). N o te: If a hearing to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ ville and Monterey, Calif., over Cali­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests tor vehicle, over regular routes, trans­ fornia Highway 1, (4) between Redding it be held at Washington, D.C. porting: General commodities (except and Kingsburg, Calif., from Redding No. MC 52110 (Sub-No. 92) filed Feb­ those of unusual value, classes A and B over Interstate Highway 5 to junction ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: BRADY explosives, household goods as defined by with California Highway 16, over Califor­ MOTORFRATE, INC., 1223 Sixth Ave­ the Commission, commodities in bulk, nia Highway 16 to junction with U.S. nue, Des Moines, Iowa. Applicant’s and those requiring special equipment), Highway 99 at Sacramento (also from representative: Homer E. Bradshaw, 5th serving Beardstown, 111., as an off-route junction Interstate Highway 5 and U.S. Floor Central National Building, Des point in connection with applicant’s reg­ Highway 99E at Red Bluff, over U.S. Moines, Iowa, 50309. Authority sought ular route operations. N o te: If a hear­ Highway 99E to junction California to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Highway 20, thence over California tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ quests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., or Highway 20 to junction California High­ porting: Foodstuffs, from the plantsite Springfield, 111. way 65, over California Highway 65 to and warehouse facilities of American No. MC 72243 (Sub-No. 17), filed Feb­ junction Interstate Highway 80, and Home Foods at or near La Porte, Ind., ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: THE AETNA thence over Interstate Highway 80 to to points in Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Ne­ FREIGHT LINES, INCORPORATED, junction U.S. Highway 99) and thence braska, South Dakota, and Minnesota. 2507 Youngstown Road SE., Post Office over U.S. Highway 99 to Kingsburg, (5) N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Box 350, Warren, Ohio. Applicant’s rep­ between Williams and Marysville, Calif., applicant requests it be held at Chicago, resentative: James M. Burtch, Colum­ over California Highway 20, (6) between 111. bus Center; 100 East Broad Street, Co­ San Francisco and Sacramento, Calif., No. MC 53965 (Sub-No. 49), filed Feb­ lumbus, Ohio, 43215. Authority sought over Interstate Highway 80, (7) between ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: GRAVES to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ Davis and Oroville, Calif., over California TRUCK LINE, INC., Salina, Kans. Ap­ tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ Highway 113 to junction California plicant’s representative: John E. Jan- porting: (1) Heavy machinery, contrac­ Highway 99. dera, 641 Harrison Street, Topeka, Kans., tors’ equipment, and steel articles, fab­ Thence over California Highway 99 to 66603. Authority sought to operate as ricated beyond the primary stage and junction California Highway 20, thence a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over requiring specialized handling or rigging over California Highway 20 to junction irregular routes, transporting: Meats, because of size or weight, between points California Highway 70, thence over Cali­ meat products, meat byproducts, and in that part of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, fornia Highway 70 to Oroville, (8) be­ articles distributed by meat packing­ Michigan, and Wisconsin within 300 tween San Francisco and Stockton, houses, as described in sections A and C miles of Chicago, HI., including Chi­ Calif., over Interstate Highway 580 to of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ cago, except that service to and from junction Interstate Highway 205, thence tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 Kenosha, Milwaukee, and Racine, Wis., over Interstate Highway 205 to junction

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3154 NOTICES

Interstate Highway 5, thence over Inter­ rected February 9, 1966, and republished off-route point, in connection with ap­ state Highway 5 to Stockton, (9) be­ as corrected and amended this issue. plicant’s regular route operations, for tween junction U.S. Highway 40 near Applicant: L & F GRANITE HAULING purpose of interchanging of traffic at Fairfield, Calif., and junction U.S. High­ CO., INC., 42 Maywood Avenue, Ham­ said terminal site. N o te: If a hearing is way 99, near Lodi, Calif., over California burg, N.Y. Applicant’s representative: deemed necessary, applicant requests it Highway 12, (10) between Oakland and William J. Hirsch, 43 Niagara Street, be held at Chicago, HI. Oroville, Calif., from Oakland over Cali­ Buffalo, N.Y., 14202. Authority sought No. MC 103066 (Sub-No. 22), filed Feb­ fornia Highway 24 to junction Interstate to operate as a common carrier, by motor ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: STONE Highway 680 at Walnut Creek, thence vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ TRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation, over Interstate Highway 680 to junction ing: Granite, granite monuments, Post Office Box 2014, Tulsa, Okla. Appli­ California Highway 4, thence over Cali­ marble, marble monuments, stone, and cant’s representative: W. T. Brunson, fornia Highway 4 to junction California stone monuments, from Buffalo and 419 Northwest Sixth Street, Oklahoma Highway 160, thence over California Hamburg, N.Y., to points in that part City, Okla. Authority sought to oper­ Highway 160 to Sacramento, and thence of Pennsylvania on and bounded by U.S. ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ over California Highway 70 to Oroville, Highway 15 commencing at the New hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ (11) between junction California High­ York-Pennsylvania State line, thence ing: Plastic conduit, pipe or tubing, with way 4 and Interstate Highway 80, near over U.S. Highway 15 to junction U.S. or without valves or fittings, compound, Pinole, Calif., and Stockton, Calif., over Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 joint sealer, bonding cement, primer, California Highway 4, (12) between to junction U.S. Highway 62, thence over coating, thinner and accessories used in junction California Highway 33 and In­ U.S. Highway 62 to the Pennsylvania- the installation of such conduit, pipe or terstate Highway 205, near Tracy, Calif., Ohio State line, thence north to Lake tubing, from the Oklahoma Ordnance and junction California Highway 180, Erie, and returned shipments of the Works (Mayes County), Okla., to points near Mendota, Calif., over California above commodities on return. N ote: in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Highway 33, (13) between junction Cali­ Applicant states that he intends to tack Georgia, Hlinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisi­ fornia Highways 33 and 180 and Fresno, the above proposed operation with au­ ana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Calif., over California Highway 180, (14) thority presently held. The purpose of Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mex­ between Watsonville, Calif., and junction this republication is to correctly identify ico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennes­ U.S. Highway 99, near Califa, Calif., over the destination territory and to indicate see, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming, California Highway 152, (15) between applicant’s intention to tack the above and South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing Vernalis and Modesto, Calif., over Cali­ proposed authority with that presently is deemed necessary, applicant requests fornia Highway 132, and (16) between held. If a hearing is deemed necessary, it be held at Oklahoma City or Tulsa, Gustine and Merced, Calif., over Califor­ applicant requests that it be held at Okla., Dallas or Houston, Tex., or Kansas nia Highway 140, serving all intermedi­ Buffalo, N.Y. City, Mo. ate points in (1) through (16) above, and No. MC 87720 (Sub-No. 48), filed No. MC 103191 (Sub-No. 19), filed Feb­ points on and within twenty (20) miles February 3, 1966. Applicant: HASS ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: THE GEO. A. of the described highways. N o te: Ap- TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., Star RHEMAN CO., INC., Post Office Box licant states it does not propose to trans­ Route A, Old Croton Road, Flemington, 2095, Station A, Charleston, S.C. Appli­ port any shipments of the following: N.J. Applicant’s representative: Bert cant’s representative: Frank A. Graham, (a) Used household goods and per­ Collins, 140 Cedar Street, New York 6, Jr., 707 Security Federal Building, Co­ sonal effects not packed in accordance N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a lumbia, S.C. Authority sought to oper­ with the crated property requirements, contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ (b) automobiles, trucks, and buses, irregular routes, transporting: Poly vinyl hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: namely, new and used, finished or unfin­ chloride, dry, in bulk, in tank or hopper Alum, in bulk, frpm points in York Coun­ ished passenger automobiles (including vehicle, from Pottstown, Pa., to Trenton, ty, S.C., to points in Georgia, North Car­ jeeps), ambulances, hearses, and taxis, N.J. Restriction: Proposed service will olina, and Tennessee. N o te: If a hear­ freight automobiles, automobile chassis, be performed under contract with Amer­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ trucks, truck chassis, truck trailers, ican Biltrite Rubber Co., Inc. N o te: If quests it be held at Columbia, S.C. trucks and trailers combined, buses and a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant No. MC 103435 (Sub-No. 173), bus chassis, (c) livestock, (d) commod­ requests it be held at Washington, D.C. (Amendment), filed December 13, 1965, ities requiring the use of special refriger­ No. MC 92983 (Sub-No. 494), filed published in F ederal R egister, issue of ation or temperature control in specially February 1, 1966. Applicant: ELDON February 10, 1966, amended, and repub­ designed and constructed refrigerator MILLER, INC., Post Office Drawer 617, lished as amended this issue. Applicant : equipment, (e) liquids, compressed Kansas City, Mo., 54141. Authority UNITED-BUCKINGHAM FREIGHT gases, commodities in semiplastic form sought to operate as a common carrier, LINES, a corporation, East 915 Spring- and commodities in suspension in liquids by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, field Avenue, Spokane, Wash. Appli­ in bulk, in tank trucks, tank trailers, transporting: Acids and chemicals, in cant’s representative: George R. LaBis- tank semitrailers or a combination of bulk, from points in Colorado, to points soniere, 533 Central Building, Seattle, such highway vehicles, (f) commodities in Oklahoma and Texas. N ote: If a Wash., 98104. Authority sought to oper­ when transported in bulk' in dump trucks hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ or in hopper type trucks, (g) commod­ requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo. hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: ities when transported in motor vehicles No. MC 103017 (Sub-No. 21), filed Feb­ Commodities which, because of size or equipped for mechanical mixing in ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: MERCURY weight, require the use of special equip­ transit, (h) fruits, fresh or green (not MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., 954 ment, (1) between points in Washington, cold pack or frozen) and vegetables, Hersey Street, St. Paul, Minn. Author­ Oregon, Idaho, and Montana; and (2) fresh or green (not cold pack or frozen), ity sought to operate as a common car­ between points in Washington, Oregon, including mushrooms, fresh, when the rier, by motor vehicle, over regular Idaho, and Montana, on the one hand, point of destination is a cannery, accu­ routes, transporting: General commodi­ and, on the other, points in California, mulation station, cold storage plant, pre­ ties (except those of unusual value, Nevada, Wyoming, North Dakota, South cooling plant or winery, and (i) metal classes A and B explosives, livestock, Dakota, and Colorado. N ote : Applicant cans or can tops, bottoms or ends. household goods as defined by the Com­ states that it intends to tack authority as The purpose of this republication is to mission, commodities in bulk, and those sought under the second part of the ap­ more clearly set forth the proposed requiring special equipment), serving the plication with authority already existing operations. If a hearing is deemed nec­ terminal site of Cooper-Jarrett, Inc., on and authorized in applicant’s existing essary, applicant requests it be held at Frontage Road (formerly old U.S. High­ certificates, the same being contained in San Francisco, Calif. way 66) and now parallel to new U.S. Docket MC 103435 (Sub-Nos. 30, 32, 39, No. MC 84420 (Sub-No. 8) (Correc­ Highway 66 and Interstate Highway 55, and 89), which authorities already au­ tion) (Amendment), filed January 10, approximately one-half mile west of thorize commodities which, because of 1966, published in F ederal R egister issue County Line Road, in an unincorporated size or weight, require the use of special of February 3, 1966, amended and cor­ portion of Du Page County, 111., a s a n equipment between points in Wyoming,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3155

North Dakota, South Dakota, and Mon­ products thereof, from Louisville, Ky., to chusetts and Rhode Island. N ote: The tana, The purpose of the above amend­ points in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, purpose of this republication is to clearly ment is restrictive in nature and is a re­ Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, set forth the authority sought. If a duction from the application as origi­ Virginia, and West Virginia, and dam­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant nally filed in that it seeks authority on aged, returned, and rejected shipments requests it be held at Providence, R.I. a nonradial basis in Washington, Ore­ o f the commodities specified above, on No. MC 108676 (Sub-No. 15), filed Feb­ gon, Idaho, and Montana; and, under the return. N o te: I f a hearing is deemed ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: A. J. METLER second part thereof, it seeks authority necessary, applicant requests it be held HAULING AND RIGGING, INC., 117 on a radial basis between the States at Atlanta, Ga. Chicamauga Avenue NE., Knoxville, named in the first part of (2) above on No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 285), filed Tenn. Applicant’s representative: Rob­ the one hand and the States names in the. February 2, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- ert M. Pearce, Central Building, 1033 second part of (2) above on the other MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post State Street, Bowling Green, Ky. Au­ hand. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- thority sought to operate as a common applicant requests it be held at Seattle, son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s represent­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Wash. atives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Trans­ routes, transporting: Iron and steel, and No. MC 103880 (Sub-No. 354) (Amend­ portation Building, Washington, D.C., iron and steel articles, between points in ment) , filed December 23,1965, published 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr. (same ad­ Tennessee on and east of U.S. Highway in F ederal R egister, issue of January 20, dress as applicant). Authority sought 127, on the one hand, and, on the other, 1966, amended February 7, 1966, and re­ to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ points in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, published as amended this issue. Appli­ tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, cant; PRODUCERS TRANSPORT, INC., porting: Chemical solvents, in bulk, in Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, West 215 East Waterloo Road, Akron, Ohio. tank vehicles, from Baton Rouge, La., Virginia, and South Carolina. N o te: Ap­ Applicant’s representative: Carl L. to points in California, Connecticut, plicant states it intends to tack the pro­ Steiner, 39 South La Salle Street, Chi­ Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, posed authority with its present author­ cago, 111., 60603. Authority sought to and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is ity in MC 108676 and MC 108676 Subs 10 operate as a common carrier, by motor deemed necessary, applicant requests it and 14 wherein it is authorized to oper­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ be held at Washington, D.C. ate in the States of Tennessee, Alabama, ing: Anhydrous ammonia, in bulk, from No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 286), filed Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Flor­ Joliet, 111., to points in Iowa, Michigan, February 7, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- ida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio, and Missouri. N ote : The purpose Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North of this republication is to more clearly son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s represent­ Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, set forth the commodity description. If atives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Trans­ South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, West a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant portation Building, Washington, D.C., Virginia, and the District of Columbia. requests it be held at Chicago, 111. 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr. (same ad­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ No. MC 104523 (Sub-No. 36), filed Feb­ dress as applicant). Authority sought cant requests it be held at Washington, ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: WILLIAM to operate as a common carrier, by motor D.C. HAROLD HUSTON, doing business as vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 108676 (Sub-No. 16), filed Feb­ HUSTON TRUCK LINE, Friend, Nebr. ing: Liquid alum, in bulk, in tank vehi­ ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: A. J. MET­ Applicant’s representative: James E. cles, from Naheola, Ala., to points in LER HAULING AND RIGGING, INC., Ryan,'214 Sharp Building, Lincoln, Nebr., Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, 117 Chicamauga Avenue NE., Knoxville, 68508. Authority sought to operate as a Mississippi, and, Tennessee. N o te: If a Tenn. Applicant’s representative: Rob­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ert M. Pearce, 1033 State Street, Bowl­ irregular routes, transporting: Mineral requests it be held at Birmingham, Ala., ing Green, Ky. Authority sought to and high protein meals for livestock, or Washington, D.C. operate as a common carrier, by motor from points in Brown County, Tex., to No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 287), filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ points in Kansas, Nebraska, Utah, New February 7, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- ing: (1) Commodities which because of Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming, North Da­ MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post size or weight require the use of special kota, South Dakota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- equipment or handling, (2) commodities Minnesota, Illinois, Oklahoma, Arkansas, son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s represent­ which because of size or weight do not Louisiana, M issouri, and Colorado. atives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Trans­ require the use of special equipment or Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, portation Building, Washington, D.C., handling moving in the same shipment applicant requests it be held at Omaha, 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr., Post Office or same vehicle with commodities which Nebr. Box 1250, Jackson, Miss., 39205. Au­ because of size or weight require the use No. MC 106400 (Sub-No. 63), filed Feb­ thority sought to operate as a common of special equipment or handling, be­ ruary 2,1966. Applicant: KAW TRANS­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular tween Knoxville, Tenn., and points with­ PORT COMPANY, a corporation, 701 routes, transporting: Benzene, in bulk, in 75 miles of Knoxville, Tenn., on the North Sterling, Sugar Creek, Mo., 64054. in tank vehicles, from Cheek, Tex, and one hand, and, on the other, points in Authority sought to operate as a common points within ten (10) miles thereof, to Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular points in Mississippi. N o te: If a hear­ Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Virginia. N o te: Applicant states it in­ in tank vehicles, from Wood River, 111., quests it be held at Jackson, Miss., or tends to tack the above proposed author­ and points within 5 miles thereof, to Baton Rouge, La. ity with that authority previously points in Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, No. MC 107286 (Sub-No. 18) (Amend­ granted in MC 108676 and Subs 10 and Nebraska, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, ment), filed January 5, 1966, published 14. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Illinois. N o te: F ederal R egister issue of January 27, applicant requests it be held at Knox­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ 1966, amended February 2, 1966, and ville, Tenn. cant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., republished as amended" this issue. Ap­ No. MC 108859 (Sub-No. 43) . filed Feb­ or Chicago, 111. plicant: M. PASCALE TRUCKING, INC., ruary 11, 1966. Applicant: CLAIR- No. MC 106674 (Sub-No. 54), filed Feb­ 8-10 Rice Street, South Attleboro, Mass., MONT TRANSFER CO., a corporation, ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: SCHILLI 02774. Applicant’s representative: Rus­ 1803 Seventh Avenue North, Escanaba, MOTOR LINES, INC., Schilli Building, sell B. Cumett, 36 Circuit Drive, Edge- Mich. Applicant’s representative: John East St. Louis, HI., 62201. Applicant's wood Station, Providence, R.I., 02905. L. Bruemmer, 121 West Doty Street, representative: Thomas F. Kilroy, 1341 Authority sought to operate as a com­ Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority sought G Street NW., Colorado Building, Wash­ mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor ington, D.C., 20005. Authority sought to regular routes, transporting: Brick and vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ operate as a common carrier, by motor tile, in vehicles equipped with mechanical ing: General commodities (except those vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ loading and unloading devices, between of unusual value, classes A and B ex­ ing: Sugar and blends, mixtures and Attleboro, Mass., and points in Massa­ plosives, household goods as defined by

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No. 38------7 3156 NOTICES

the Commission, commodities in bulk, Mich. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ White Sands Missile Range, N. Mex., from commodities requiring special equip­ liam D. Parsley, Union Savings and Loan Oro Grande over unnumbered highway ment, and those injurious or contami­ Building, 117 West Allegan Street, to the White Sands Missile Range, and nating to other lading), serving the site Lansing, Mich., 48933. Authority sought of the Milwaukee County Council, Boy return over the same route, serving no to operate as a common carrier, by motor intermediate points. N o te: Applicant Scouts of America Camp, located ap­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ states no duplicating authority sought. proximately five (5) miles west of Wis­ ing: General commodities (except classes If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ consin Highway 32 near Wabeno, Forest A and B explosives), (1) between Flint, plicant requests it be held at Roswell, County, Wis., and the site of the Black- Mich., and points in Bay, Saginaw, Tus­ N. Mex. well Job Corps Conservation Center, cola, Huron, Sanilac, St. Clair, Lapeer, No. MC 110505 (Sub-No. 66), filed Blackwell, Forest County, Wis., as off- Genesee, Shiawassee, Clinton, Eaton, February 7, 1966. Applicant: RINGLE route points in connection with appli­ Ingham, Livingston, Oakland, Macomb, TRANSPORT, INC., 405 South Grant cant’s regular-route operations in Mich­ Wayne, Washtenaw, Jackson, Gratiot, Avenue, Fowler, Ind. Applicant’s repre­ igan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ionia, Kent, and Calhoun Counties, sentative: Robert C. Smith, 620 Illinois Kentucky. N ote: If a hearing is deemed Mich., (2) between Battle Creek, Mich., Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Au­ necessary, applicant requests it be held and points in Calhoun, Branch, St. thority sought to operate as a common at Madison, Wis. Joseph, Cass, Kalamazoo, Eaton, Ing­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 109132 (Sub-No. 22), filed Feb­ ham, Jackson, Shiawassee, Clint, Ionia, routes, transporting: Foodstuffs (except ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: FREIGHT Kent, Ottawa, Allegan, and Genesee in bulk, in tank vehicles), from the plant- WAYS, INC., 1309 North Mosley, Wich­ Counties, Mich., and (3) between Grand site of American Home Foods Corp., La ita, Kans. Authority sought to operate Rapids, Mich., and points in Kent, Porte, Ind., to points in Illinois, Wiscon­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Ottawa, Muskegon, Montcalm, Ionia, sin, Michigan, Ohio, Missouri, and Ken­ over irregular routes, transporting: Gratiot, Clinton, Ingham, Eaton, Cal­ tucky. N o te: If a hearing is deemed Meats, meat products, meat "byproducts, houn, Kalamazoo, Allegan, Shiawassee, necessary, applicant requests it be held and articles distributed by meat pack­ and Genesee Counties, Mich. N ote : Ap­ at Chicago, 111. inghouses, as described in sections A and plicant states the service by motor vehi­ No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 768), filed C of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ cle shall be limited to service which is February 3, 1966. Applicant: CHEMI­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 auxiliary to or supplemental of rail serv­ CAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 M. C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities ice of Grand Truck Western Railroad Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. in bulk in tank vehicles), from Salina, and all shipments shall move on a Applicant’s representative: Leonard A. Kans., and points within 5 miles thereof, through bill of lading involving an im­ Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street NW., Madi­ to points in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, mediately prior or subsequent movement son Building, Washington, D.C., and and Missouri, and points in Dane, Green, by rail. Carrier shall not serve any point Edwin H. van Deusen, 520 East Lan­ Jefferson, Kenosha, Rock, Walworth,, not a station on the rail line of the rail­ caster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Au­ and Waukesha Counties* Wis. N ote : If road. If a hearing is deemed necessary, thority sought to operate as a common a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant applicant requests it be held at Lansing, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular requests it be held at Wichita, Kans. Mich. routes, transporting: Coal tar pitch, dry, No. MC 109136 (Sub-No. 28), filed No. MC 110264 (Sub-No. 33), filed in bulk, in tank or hopper type ve­ February 1, 1966. Applicant: ORIOLE January 26, 1966. Applicant: ALBU­ hicles, from Ironton, and Cleveland, CHEMICAL CARRIERS, INC., 9722 QUERQUE PHOENIX EXPRESS, INC., Ohio, to points in Illinois, Indiana, Mich­ Pulaski Highway, Baltimore, Md., 21220. 4500 McLeod Road, NE., Post Office Box Applicant’s representative: Maxwell A. igan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and 404, Albuquerque, N. Mex. Applicant’s West Virginia. N o t e : If a hearing is Howell, 1511 K Street NW., Washington, representative: Paul F. Sullivan, 1341 G deemed necessary, applicant requests it D.C., 20005. Authority sought to operate Street NW., Colorado Building, Suite 913, be held at Washington, D.C. as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, Washington, D.C., 20005. Authority No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 769), filed over irregular routes, transporting: sought to operate as a common carrier, February 7, 1966. Applicant: CHEMI­ Liguid caustic potash, in bulk, in tank by motor vehicle, over regular routes, CAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 vehicles, from the plantsite of Diamond transporting: General commodities (ex­ East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Alkali Co. at Delaware City, Del., to cept those of unusual value, classes A Pa. Applicant’s representatives: Leon­ points in New Jersey, Maryland, that and B explosives, household goods as ard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street NW., part of Pennsylvania on and east of U.S. defined by the Commission, commodities Washington, D.C., 20005, and Edwin H. Highway 220, that part of Virginia on in bulk, and commodities requiring spe­ van Deusen, 506 East Lancaster Avenue, and east of a line beginning at the Vir­ cial equipment), (1) between El Paso, Downingtown, Pa. Authority sought to ginia-North Carolina State line and ex­ Tex., and Tularosa, N. Mex.: From El operate as a common carrier, by motor tending along U.S. Highway 220 to and Paso over U.S. Highway 54 to Tularosa, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ including Roanoke, Va., and thence and return over the same route, serving ing: Foundry facing, in bulk, from West along U.S. Highway 11 to the Virginia- all intermediate points and the off-route Elizabeth, Allegheny County, Pa., to West Virginia State line, that part of point of Ruidoso, N. Mex.; (2) serving Bridgeport, Conn. N ote : If a hearing is New York on, east, south and west of a points in New Mexico located east of U.S. deemed necessary, applicant requests it line beginning at the New York-Pennsyl- Highway 285 within 30 miles of Carlsbad, be held at Washington, D.C. vania State line and extending along N. Mex., as off-route points in connection No. MC 110541 (Sub-No. 7), filed Feb­ New York Highway 34 to Waverly, N.Y., with applicant’s presently authorized ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: MARK E. thence along New York Highway 17 to regular route operations; (3) between YODER, INC., 41 Parkway, Schuylkill Binghamton, N.Y., thence along New Tularosa, N. Mex., and Vaughn, N. Mex.: Haven, Pa. Applicant’s representative: York Highway 7 to and including Troy, From Tularosa over U.S. Highway 54 to Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front N. Y., thence along U.S. Highway 4 to Vaughn, and return over the same route, Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Authority junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along serving all intermediate points; (4) be­ sought to operate as a common carrier, U.S. Highway 9 to junction U.S. Highway tween Alamogordo, N. Mex., and Artesia, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, 6, thence along U.S. Highway 6 to the N. Mex.: From Alamogordo over U.S. transporting: (1) Anthracite coal, in bulk New York-Connecticut State line, and Highway 54 to junction New Mexico in dump vehicles, from points in Carbon the District of Columbia. N o te: If a Highway 83, thence over New Mexico and Schuylkill Counties, Pa., to the hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Highway 83 to Artesia, and return over plantsite of Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc requests it be held at Washington, D.C. the same route, serving aH intermediate Co., at Spelter, Harrison County, W. Va., No. MC 109475 (Sub-No. 4), filed points, and the site of the U.S. Govern­ and (2) bituminous coal, in bulk in dump January 17, 1966. Applicant: ment Solar Furnace located approxi­ vehicles, from points in Monongalia, Ma­ CHARLES D. BRUCE, Jr., doing busi­ mately 3.5 miles north of Cloudcrouft, N. rion, and Barbour Counties, W. Va., to ness as BRUCE CARTAGE COMPANY, Mex., as an off-route point; and (5) be­ the plantsite of the New Jersey Zinc Co. 3460 East Washington Road, Saginaw, tween Oro Grande, N. Mex., and the in Palmerton, Carbon County, Pa.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3157 transporting: General commodities (ex­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, see, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and applicant requests it be held at Washing­ Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deem­ cept those of unusual value and except ton, D.C. ed necessary, applicant requests it be dangerous explosives, corpses, household No. MG 110988 (Sub-No. 168), filed held at Chicago, 111. goods as defined in Practices of Motor January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 172), filed Common Carriers of Household Goods, TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, com­ nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- modities requiring special equipment and E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: those injurious or contaminating to Building, Washington, D.C. Authority E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation other lading), (1) between Little Rock, sought to operate as a common carrier, Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Au­ Ark., and St. Louis, Mo., over U.S. High­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, thority sought to operate as a common way 67, serving Hoxie and Coming, Ark., transporting: Dry fertilizers, in bulk, in carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular for purpose of joinder only; and (2) tank or hopper type vehicles, from the routes, transporting: Starch, in bulk, between Little Rock, Ark., and junction warehouse or storage facilities of Con­ from Hammond, Ind., to points in Illi­ U.S. Highway 62 and Arkansas High­ sumers Cooperative Associations, at or nois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Mis­ way 135, located near Coming, Ark., as near Council Bluffs, Iowa, to points in souri, and Kentucky. N o te: If a hear­ follows: From Little Rock, over U.S. Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Col­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Highway 67 to junction Arkansas High­ way 14, thence over Arkansas Highway 14 orado, and South Dakota. N ote: If a quests that it be held at Chicago, HI. hearing is deemed necessary, applicant No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 173), filed to junction Arkansas Highway 39, thence requests it be held at Chicago, 111. January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO over Arkansas Highway 39 to junction No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 169), filed TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- Arkansas Highway 1, thence over Ar­ January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: kansas Highway 1 to junction Arkansas TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Highway 135, thence over Arkansas nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Au­ Highway 135 to junction U.S. Highway E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation thority sought to operate as a common 62, located near Coming, Ark., serv­ Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Au­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregu­ ing Jonesboro, Ark., for purpose of thority sought to operate as a common lar routes, transporting: Fertilizer and joinder only, as an alternate route, for carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular fertilizer ingredients, in bulk, from operating convenience only, to be used routes, transporting: Animal fats, animal Joliet, 111., to points in Iowa, Michigan, in conjuction with applicant’s regular oils and vegetable oils, including products Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, route operations. Note: If a hearing is and blends of such commodities, from Ohio, and Missouri. N o te: If a hearing deemed necessary, applicant requests Chicago, 111., to points in Alabama, Ar­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Little Rock, Ark. kansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illi­ it be held at Chicago, 111. No. MC 111729 (Sub-No. 135), filed nois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 132), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: AR­ Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minne­ February 3, 1966. Applicant: JONES MORED CARRIER CORPORATION, sota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma 222-17 Northern Boulevard, Bayside, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Rus­ Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, sought to operate as a common carrier, sell S. Bernhard, 1625 K Street NW., Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Washington, D.C., 20066. Authority Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. transporting: Lubricating oils, petroleum sought to operate as a common carrier, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, lubricating products, proprietary anti­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, freeze, alcohol compounds, carbon gum transporting: Commercial papers, busi­ 111. and sludge removing compounds, greases, ness papers, records, and audit and ac­ No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 170), filed core oils and compounds, and automobile counting media, between points in January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO chemicals and compounds, from Dan­ Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties, TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- ville, 111., to points in Indiana, Ohio, Mich., on the one hand, and, on the nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Kentucky, Minnesota, Tennessee, West other, points in Ohio (except Cleveland). Wilmer B. Hill, Transportation Build­ Virginia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New N o te: Applicant is authorized to con­ ing, Washington, D.C., 20006. Author­ York, Michigan, Maryland, Delaware, duct operations as a nontract carrier in ity sought to operate as a common car­ Virginia, and the District of Columbia. permit MC 112750 and subs; therefore, rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, dual operations may be involved. If a routes, transporting: Dry plastics, in applicant does not specify a location. hearing is deemed necessary, applicant bulk, in tank vehicles, and plastic lines, No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 133), filed requests it be held at Detroit, Mich. in mixed loads from Detroit, Mich., February 7, 1966. Applicant: JONES No. MC 112520 (Sub-No. 137) (Amend­ to points in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma ment) , filed January 21, 1966, published N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority in F ederal R egister, issue of February applicant requests it be held at Detroit, sought to operate as a common carrier, 10, 1966, amended, and republished as Mich. by motor vehicle, over regular routes, amended this issue. Applicant: MC­ No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 171), filed transporting: General commodities (ex­ KENZIE TANK LINES, INC., New January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO cept classes A and B explosives, livestock, Quincy Road, Post Office Box 1200, TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- household goods, and commodities re­ Tallahassee, Fla. Applicant’s repre­ nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: quiring special equipment), between sentative: Sol H. Proctor, 1730 American E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Conway, Ark., and site of Lock and Dam Heritage Life Building, Jacksonville, Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Au­ No. 8 on the Arkansas River, as follows: Fla., 32202. Authority sought to operate thority sought to operate as a common From Conway, over Arkansas Highway as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregu­ 60 to junction unnumbered access road over irregular routes, transporting: Sul­ lar routes, transporting: Corn syrup, and thence over unnumbered access road furic acid, from Pierce, Fla., to Valdosta liquid sugar, and blends and mixtures to site of Lock and Dam No. 8 on the and Adel, Ga. N ote : The purpose of this thereof, products of corn, such as corn Arkansas River, and return over the republication is to add Adel, Ga., as a starch, corn gluten feed, and corn glu­ same route, serving no intermediate destination point. If a hearing is ten meal, from Elk Grove Village, 111., to points. N o te: If a hearing is deemed deemed necessary, applicant requests it points in Arkansas, Alabama, Colorado, necessary, applicant does not specify a be held at Washington, D.C., or Jack­ Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, In­ location. sonville, Fla. diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisi­ No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 134), filed No. MC 113255 (Sub-No. 48), filed ana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, February 7, 1966. Applicant: JONES February 7, 1966. Applicant: MILK Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office Box Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority 2698, New Brighton, Minn. Applicant’s Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, sought to operate as a common carrier, representative: Val M. Higgins, 1000 South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennes­ by motor vehicle, over regular routes, First National Bank Building, Minne-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3158 NOTICES

apolis, Minn., 55402. Authority sought No. MC 113463 (Sub-No. 6) (Correc­ No. MC 115594 (Sub-No. 12) (Amend­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor tion), filed November 1, 1965, published ment), filed September 3, 1965, pub­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ in F ederal R egister issue of November lished F ederal R egister issue of Sep­ ing : Cleaning, scouring and washing 18, 1965, and republished as corrected, tember 29, 1965, amended February 4, compounds, in bulk, in tank vehicles, this issue. Applicant: CONTRACT 1966, and republished as amended this from St. Paul, Minn., to Pisgah Forest, CARRIERS, INC., 830 Broadway NE., Al­ issue. Applicant: HOLLOWAY MOTOR N.C. N o te: If a hearing is deemed buquerque, N. Mex., 87102. Applicant’s EXPRESS, INC., Piedmont Highway, necessary, applicant requests it be held representative: V. L. Brown, 606 Bank of East Gadsden, Ala. Applicant’s repre­ at Minneapolis, Minn. New Mexico Building, Albuquerque, sentative: John W. Cooper, 805 Title No. MC 113336 (Sub-No. 82), filed N. Mex., 87101. Authority sought to op­ Building, Birmingham, Ala., 35203. Au­ February 1, 1966. Applicant: PETRO­ erate as a contract carrier, by motor thority sought to operate as a common LEUM TRANSIT COMPANY, INC., Post vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Office Box 921, Lumberton, N.C. Ap­ ing: Malt beverages, from Golden, Colo., routes, (7) serving off-route points in plicant’s representative: James E. Wil­ to Hobbs, N. Mex., and empty malt bever­ Georgia enclosed by and including points son, 1735 K Street NW., Washington, age containers, on return. N o te: The or* the following boundaries: Beginning D.C., 20006. Authority sought to oper­ purpose of this republication is to correct at the Alabama-Georgia State line, ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ the docket number which was assigned thence over U.S. Highway 78 to Atlanta, hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ MC 34865 Sub-No. 40 in error. The thence over U.S. Highway 41 to Marietta, ing: Petroleum products, in containers, docket number should be MC 113463 Sub- thence over Georgia Highway 5 to the from Tampa, Fla., to points in Georgia, No. 6. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Georgia-Tennessee State line, thence in South Carolina,_ Alabama, and Missis­ applicant requests it be held at Albuquer­ a westerly direction along the Georgia- sippi, and refused, damaged, and re­ que, N. Mex. Tennessee State line to junction Ala­ jected shipments, on return. N ote : Com­ No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. 235), filed bama-Georgia State line, thence in a mon control may be involved. If a hear­ February 8, 1966. Applicant: CURTIS, southerly direction along the Alabama- ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ INC., 770 East 51st Avenue, Denver, Colo., Georgia State line to the point of be­ quests it be held at Tampa, Fla. 80216. Applicant’s representative : ginning. N ote: The purpose of this re­ No. MC 113362 (Sub-No. 103), filed Duane W. Acklie, Post Office Box 2028, publication is to add (7) above to the February 7, 1966. Applicant: ELLS­ Lincoln, Nebr. Authority sought to op­ previous publication. If a hearing is WORTH FREIGHT LINES, INC., 220 erate as a common carrier, by motor deemed necessary, applicant requests it East Broadway, Eagle Grove, Iowa. Ap­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ be held at Atlanta, Ga., Birmingham, plicant’s representative: Donald L. ing: Aninj.al, poultry, and fish feed, and Ala., or Kansas City, Mo. Stem, 630 City National Bank Building, feed ingredients, and supplements there­ No. MC 115716 (Sub-No. 12), filed Omaha, Nebr., 68102. Authority sought of (except in bulk, in tank vehicles), be­ February 7, 1966. Applicant: DENVER- to operate as a common carrier, by motor tween points in Wyoming, Montana, LIMON-BURLINGTON TRANSFER vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Nebraska, Iowa, and Kansas, on the one COMPANY, a corporation, 3650 Chest­ ing: Meats, packinghouse products, and hand, and, on the other, points in Con­ nut Place, Denver, Colo. Applicant’s commodities used by packinghouses, as necticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, representative: Edward C. Hastings, 330 described in appendix I, Ex Parte MC- Rhode Island, and New York. N ote: If Petroleum Club Building, Denver, Colo., 45, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except com­ a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant 80202. Authority sought to operate as modities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from requests it be held at Lincoln, Nebr. a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over the plantsite of Geo. A. Hormel & Co., No. MC 114106 (Sub-No. 50), filed a regular route, transporting: Classes A at or near Bureau, 111., to points in February 8, 1966. Applicant: MAY- and B explosives, between Denver, Colo., Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Mas­ BELLE TRANSPORT COMPANY, a cor­ and Colby, Kans., over U.S. Highway 24, sachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, poration, Post Office Box 573, Lexington, serving all intermediate points. N o te: New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, N.C. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Vir­ liam P. Sullivan, 1825 Jefferson Place cant requests it be held at Denver, Colo. ginia, Iowa, Minnesota, and the District NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. Author­ No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 128), filed of Columbia. Restriction: Traffic re­ ity sought to operate as a common car­ February 1, 1966. Applicant: W. J. DIG- stricted to that originating at the above rier, by motor vehicle, over -irregular BY, INC., Post Office Box 5088 Terminal named plantsite. N o te: If a hearing is routes, transporting: Corn products and Annex, Denver, Colo., 80217. Authority deemed necessary, applicant requests it blends of com products and sugar, in sought to operate as a common carrier, be held at Washington, D.C. bulk, from Greer, S.C., and points within by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 113387 (Sub-No. 2), filed Jan­ 5 miles thereof to points in North Caro­ transporting: Meats, meat products, uary 26, 1966. Applicant: SECURITY lina, South Carolina, and Georgia. meat byproducts, and articles distrib­ STORAGE COMPANY OF WASHING­ N o te: Applicant is also authorized to uted by meat packinghouses, as described TON, a corporation, 1701 Florida Avenue conduct operations as a contract carrier in sections A and C of appendix I to the NW., Washington, D.C., 20009. Appli­ in Permit No. MC 115176 and subs there­ report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier cant’s representative: Irving Abrams, under therefore, dual operations may be Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (ex­ 1776 Broadway, New York, N.Y., 10019. involved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ cept commodities in bulk, in tank ve­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ sary, applicant requests it be held at hicles) , from Billings, Mont., to points in mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Raleigh, N.C. Nevada, California, Wisconsin, Illinois, regular routes, transporting: Household and Colorado. N o te: If a hearing is goods, as defined by the Commission No. MC 114194 (Sub-No. 121), filed deemed necessary, applicant requests (including unaccompanied baggage) February 7,1966. Applicant: KREIDER that it be held at Billings, Mont. having a prior or subsequent movement TRUCK SERVICE, INC., 8003 Collins­ No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 129), filed in interstate or foreign commerce, be­ ville Road, East St. Louis, 111. Authority February 1,1966. Applicant: W. J. DIG- tween Washington, D.C., Alexandria, sought to operate as a common carrier, BY, INC., Post Office Box 5088 Terminal Va., and points in Arlington, Fairfax, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Annex, 1960 31st Street, Denver, Colo., Prince William, and Loudoun Counties, transporting: Syrups, sweeteners, blende 80217. Authority sought to operate as Va., and Anne Arundel, Howard, Prince thereof and corn products, from Clinton, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Georges, Charles, and Montgomery Cedar Rapids, Keokuk, and Muscatine, irregular routes, transporting: Inedible Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on Iowa, to points in New Mexico, Colorado, packinghouse products, and packing^ the other, New York, N.Y., and Balti­ Wyoming, Montana, Arizona, Utah, house products unfit for human con­ more, Md., and points in the commercial Idaho, California, Nevada, Oregon, and sumption (restricted against transporta­ zones of New York, N.Y., and Baltimore, Washington, and rejected shipments, on tion of commodities in bulk, in tank ve­ Md. N ote : If a hearing is deemed nec­ return. N o te: If a hearing is deemed hicles), from Salt Lake City, Utah, to essary, applicant requests it be held at necessary, applicant requests it be held Crete, Nebr.; Lynn Center, 111.; Port­ Washington, D.C. at St. Louis, Mo.. land, Oreg.; and Los Angeles, Oakland,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3159 points in Adams County, Nebr., to points and San Francisco, Calif. N o te: If a lor of New York, N.Y. N o te: If a hear­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, requests that it be held at Salt Lake quests it be held at Washington, D.C. Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, City, Utah. No. MC 116763 (Sub-No. 74), filed Feb­ Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. N ote : No. MC 115876 (Sub-No. 8), filed Feb­ ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: CARL SUB- Applicant states it proposes to transport ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: ERWIN LER TRUCKING, INC., North West exempt commodities, on return. If a HURNER, 2605 South Rivershore Drive, Street, Versailles, Ohio. Authority hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Moorhead, Minn. Applicant’s represent­ sought to operate as a common carrier, requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr. ative: Alan Foss, First National Bank by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 45), filed Feb­ Building, Fargo, N. Dak., 58102. Author­ transporting: Frozen foods, from the ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAM­ ity sought to operate as a contract car­ plantsite and warehouse facilities of Ore- RICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Ida Foods, Inc., near Greenville, Mich., Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s, repre­ routes, transporting: Dairy materials to points in Delaware, Kentucky, Mary­ sentative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor, land, Missouri, and New Jersey. Restric­ Continental Life Building, Fort Worth, and supplies, (1) from Moorhead, Minn., Tex., 76102. Authority sought to operate to points in North Dakota, South Dakota, tion: The authority granted herein is restricted to the transportation of ship­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Montana, and Wisconsin; and (2) from over irregular routes, transporting: Wyandotte, Mich., to points in Minne­ ments originating at the said plantsite and warehouse facilities and destined to Meat, meat products, meat byproducts, sota and Fargo, N. Dak. N o te: Appli­ and articles distributed by meat packing­ cant is also authorized to conduct opera­ points in the States specified herein. houses as described in Appendix I to the tions as a common carrier in certificate N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier No. MC 117148; therefore, dual opera­ applicant requests it be held at Lansing, Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (ex­ tions may be involved. If a hearing is Mich. ., cept commodities in bulk and tank ve­ deemed necessary, applicant requests No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 339), filed hicles), from Schuyler, Nebr., to points it be held at Fargo, N. Dak. February 3, 1966. Applicant: WILLIS in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, No. MC 116014 (Sub-No. 24), filed Feb­ SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Springs, Ark. Applicant’s representa­ Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: OLIVER Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. N ote : TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., North tive: John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Applicant states it proposes to transport Bloomfield Road, Winchester, Ky. Ap­ Fayetteville, Ark. Authority sought to exempt commodities, on return. If a plicant’s representative: Robert M. operate as a common carrier, by motor hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Pearce, 1033 State Street, Bowling Green, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr. Ky., 42101. Authority sought to operate ing: (1) Foodstuffs, from Springdale, No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 46) . filed Feb­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Ark., to points in Kansas, Missouri, Ken­ ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAM­ over irregular routes, transporting: Oil tucky and to Alton, Cairo, Carbondale, RICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, and greases, in drums and cases, from Centralia, East Saint Louis, Eldorado, Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s represen­ Bradford, Pa., and St. Mary’s, W. Va., Granite City, Marion, Mount Vernon, tative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor Con­ to Paducah and Lexington, Ky. N o te: Murphysboro, Staunton, Litchfield, tinental Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Quincy, and Scott Air Force Base, HI.; 76102. Authority sought to operate as a cant requests that it be held at Wash­ and (2) foodstuffs and baby supplies, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over ington, D.C. from Fort Smith, Ark., to points in Kan­ irregular routes, transporting: Food­ No. MC 116073 (Sub-No. 57), filed Feb­ sas, Missouri, Kentucky and to Alton, stuffs, from La Porte, Ind., to points in ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: BARRETT Cairo, Carbondale, Centralia, East Saint Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, MOBILE HOME TRANSPORT, INC., Louis, Eldorado, Granite City, Marion, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, 1825 Main Avenue, Moorhead, Minn. Mount Vernon, Murphysboro, Staunton, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Applicant’s representative: Donald E. Litchfield, Quincy, and Scott Air Force Texas. Note: Applicant states it pro­ Cross, Munsey Building, Washington Base, 111. N o te: If a hearing is deemed poses to transport exempt commodities, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a necessary, applicant requests that it be on return. If a hearing is deemed neces­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over held at Chicago, 111., or Little Rock, Ark. sary, applicant does not specify a loca­ irregular routes, transporting: Trailers No. MC 117165 (Sub-No. 22), filed Jan­ tion. designed to be drawn by passenger auto­ uary 27, 1966. Applicant: C. J. DAVIS, No. MC 118196 (Sub-No. 58), filed Feb­ mobiles, in initial movements, in truck- doing business as ST. LOUIS FREIGHT ruary 7,1966. Applicant: RAYE & COM­ away service, from Winchester, Va., to LINES, West Relief Highway US. 20, PANY TRANSPORTERS, INC., Highway points in the United States, including Michigan City, Ind. Applicant’s repre­ 71 North, Post Office Box 613, Carthage, Alaska, but excluding Hawaii. N ote: If sentative: Rex Eames, 1800 Buhl Build­ Mo. Authority sought to operate as a a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ing, Detroit, Mich., 48226. Authority common carrier, by motor vehicle, over does not specify a particular location. sought to operate as a common carrier, irregular routes, transporting: Meats, No. MC 116628 (Sub-No. 7), filed Feb­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, meat products, meat byproducts, and ar­ ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: SUBURBAN transporting: Salt and salt mixtures and ticles distributed by meat packinghouses, TRANSFER SERVICE, INC., Post Office salt products with additives, from Mid­ as described in sections A and C of ap­ Box 168, Rutherford, N.J., 07070. Ap­ land, St. Louis, Port Huron, Marysville, pendix I to the report in Descriptions in plicant’s representative: Clarence D. St. Clair and Manistee, Mich., to points Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 Todd, 1825 Jefferson Place NW., Wash­ in Kentucky. N o te: If a hearing is and 766 (except commodities in bulk, ington, D.C. Authority sought to operate deemed necessary, applicant requests it in tank vehicles), from points in Morgan as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, be held at Lansing or Detroit, Mich. and Logan Counties, Colo., to points in over irregular routes, transporting: Such No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 44), filed Feb­ Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, •merchandise as is dealt in by retail de­ ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAM­ Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Illinois, partment stores, and materials and sup­ RICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missis­ plies used in the operation of such stores, Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s represen­ sippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New including packaging materials for such tative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor, Con­ Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, Okla­ merchandise, between New York, N.Y., tinental Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., homa, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Stamford, and West Hartford, Conn., 76102. Authority sought to operate as a Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Carlstadt, Millbum, and Paramus, N.J., common carrier, by motor vehicle, over N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Philadelphia, Pa., points in Westchester irregular routes, transporting: Meat, applicant requests it be held at Denver, County, and Long Island, N.Y., Boston, meat products, meat byproducts, and ar­ Colo. Mass., and the District of Columbia. Re­ ticles distributed by meat packinghouses, No. MC 118288 (Sub-No. 8), filed Feb­ striction: The operations authorized as described in appendix I to the report ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: STEPHEN F. shall be limited to a transportation serv­ in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ FROST, 14750 Boyle Avenue, Fontana, ice to be performed under a continuing cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except com­ Calif. Authority sought to operate as a contract, or contracts, with Lord & Tay­ modities in bulk and tank vehicles), from common carrier, by motor vehicle, over

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3160 NOTICES

irregular routes, transporting: Bananas, No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 153), filed Iowa; (12) between points in Utah and and fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, and February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER points in Illinois; (13) between points fresh berries, when moving in the same TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 in Utah and points in Missouri; and (14) vehicle with bananas, from points in South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. between points in Utah. N ote: Appli­ California, to points in Idaho north of Applicant’s representative: Fred H. cant is also authorized to conduct opera­ a line running due east and west through Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, tions as a contract carrier in Permit No. Moscow, Idaho, and including Moscow, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a MC 115504 and subs thereunder; there­ Idaho. N ote: Applicant states he pro­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over fore, dual operations may be involved. poses to transport exempt commodities, irregular routes, transporting: Food If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ on return. If a hearing is deemed neces­ products, and materials, and supplies, cant requests it be held at Salt Lake City, sary, applicant requests it be held at and advertising matter, when moving in Utah. Los Angeles, Calif. conjunction therewith, from Lancaster, No. MC 120283 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ No. MC 118318 (Sub-No. . 11Y, filed Ohio, to Louisville, Ky., St. Louis, Mo., ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: MAHR February 7, 1966. Applicant: EDA-CAL and points in Illinois, Indiana, and the FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1439 Route Five, FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1798 Floral Lower Peninsula of Michigan. N o te: If South Windsor, Conn. Applicant’s rep­ Avenue, Post Office Box 422, Twin Falls, a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant resentative: Reubin Kaminsky, Suite Idaho. Applicant’s representative: Mar­ requests it be held at Chicago, 111. 223, 410 Asylum Street, Hartford, Conn. vin Handler, 405 Montgomery Street, No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 155), filed Authority sought to operate as a common Suite 1401, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. February 14, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Authority sought to operate as a com­ TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 routes, transporting: Brick, in flatbed mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. equipment, equipped with mechanical regular routes, transporting: Such mer­ Applicant’s representative: Fred H. loading and unloading devices, from the chandises as is dealt in by wholesale, re­ Figge (same address as applicant). Au­ plantsite of Kelsey Ferguson Brick Co. tail, and chain grocery and food business thority sought to operate as a common at Middleboro, Mass., to points in Con­ houses, and in connection therewith, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular equipment, materials, and supplies used necticut, and refused, damaged, and re­ routes, transporting: Meats, packing­ jected shipments on return. N o te: If a in the conduct of such business, when house products, and commodities used by hearing is deemed necessary, applicant moving to, from, or between such estab­ packinghouses as described in Part A, requests it be held at Hartford, Conn. lishments, from points in California on B, C, and D of appendix I, in Descriptions No. MC 123048 (Sub-No. 81), filed Feb­ and south of a line beginning at Fort in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: DIAMOND Bragg, Calif., and extending along Cali­ 209 and 766, restricted against the trans­ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INC,, fornia Highway 20 to junction U.S. portation of hides, and commodities in 1919 Hamilton Avenue, Racine, Wis. Au­ Highway 40, thence along U.S. Highway bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plant- thority sought to operate as a common 40 to the California-Nevada State line, site of Geo. A. Hormel & Co., at or near carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular to Billings, and Great Falls, Mont. Bureau, 111., to points in Minnesota and routes, transporting: Agricultural imple­ N o te: Common control may be involved. Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is ments and farm machinery, from Verona, If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it Wis., to points in Georgia, Kentucky, cant requests it be held at San Francisco, be held at Washington, D.C. Maryland, Ohio, North Carolina, South -Calif. No. MC 119777 (Sub-No. 53), filed No. MC 118318 (Sub-No. 12), filed Carolina, and Tennessee, and rejected February 3, 1966. Applicant: LIGON shipments, on return. N o te: If a hear­ February 7, 1966. Applicant: IDA-CAL SPECIALIZED HAULER, INC., Post ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1798 Floral Ave­ Office Box 31, Madisonville, Ky. Ap­ quests it be held at Milwaukee or Mad­ nue, Post Office Box 422, Twin Falls, plicant’s representative: Robert M. ison, Wis., or Chicago, 111., respectively. Idaho. Applicant’s representative: Mar­ Pearce, Central Building, 1033 State No. MC 123048 (Sub-No. 82), filed Feb­ vin Handler, 405 Montgomery Street, Street, Bowling Green, Ky., 42101. Au­ ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: DIAMOND Suite 1401, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. thority sought to operate as a common TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INC,, Authority sought to operate as a com­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 1919 Hamilton Avenue, Post Office Box mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ routes, transporting : Ferro-chrome, A, Racine, Wis. Applicant’s representa­ regular routes, transporting: Meat, meat ferro-chrome silicon, ferro-silicon, silico- tives Paul C. Gartzke, 121 West Doty products, and meat byproducts, as de­ manganese, ferro-manganese, silicon Street, Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority scribed in section A of appendix I to the metal, and scrap iron, between Calvert sought to operate as a common carrier, report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier City, Ky., and points in Delaware. N ote : by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ transporting: Experimental and show Billings, Mont., to points in California cant requests it be held at Washington, display tractors, and farm and industrial on and south of a line beginning at D.C. machinery and equipment, which, at the Fort Bragg, Calif., and extending along No. MC 119848 (Sub-No. 14), filed Feb­ time of movement, are being transported California Highway 20 to junction U.S. ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: KENISON for purposes of display and experiment, Highway 40, thence along U.S. Highway TRUCKING, INC., Post Office Box 324, and not for sale, and incidental para­ 40 to the California-Nevada State line. 1975 South 1045 West, Salt Lake City, phernalia, moving in the same vehicle N ote : Common control may be involved. Utah. Authority sought to operate as a and at the same time, and rejected ship­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over ments, between points in the United cant requests it be held at San Francisco, irregular routes, transporting: Scrap Calif. States (except Hawaii and Alaska). iron, steel scrap metals and junk, and N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 152), filed sewage sludge and sewage r sludge applicant requests it be held at Madison, February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER products, (1) between points in Utah and Wis., Chicago, 111., or Washington, D.C. TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 points in North Dakota; (2) between No. MC 123900 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. points in Utah and points in South Da­ ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: MARVIN Applicant’s representative: Fred H. kota; (3) between points in Utah and SATENSTEIN and SAM PRAVDER, a Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, points in Minnesota; (4) between points partnership, doing business as WEST Wis. Authority sought to operate as a in Utah and points in Montana; (5) be­ SIDE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over tween points in Utah and points in 75 Varick Street, New York, N.Y. Appli­ irregular routes, transporting: Animal Idaho; (6) between points in Utah and cant’s representative: Bert Collins 140 and poultry feed, animal and poultry points in Wyoming; (7) between points Cedar Street, New York, N.Y., 10006. feed concentrates, and animal and poul­ in Utah and points in Colorado; (8) be­ Authority sought to operate as a con­ try feed ingredients, between points tween points in Utah and points in New tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Mexico; (9) between points in Utah and regular routes, transporting: Books, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. N ote: If a points in Nevada; (10) between points pamphlets, brochures, loose, in cartons, hearing is deemed necessary, applicant in Utah and points in Wisconsin; (11) on skids and pallets; printed and unu requests it be held at Madison, Wis. between points in Utah and points in printed paper, loose, on skids or pallets,

FEDERAL ï, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3161

(1) between Englewood Cliffs, N.J., on thority sought to operate as a common is deemed necessary, applicant requests the one hand, and, on the other, West carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular it be held at Kansas City, Mo. Nyack, N.Y., in an interplant or ware­ routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ No. MC 125708 (Sub-No. 40), filed ucts, meat byproducts, and articles dis­ January 28, 1966. Applicant: HUGH house service for Prentice-Hall, Inc., (2) MAJOR, 150 Sinclair, South Roxana, 111. from West Nyack, N.Y., to New York, tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ scribed in sections A and C of appendix Authority sought to operate as a com­ N.Y., points in Nassau, Suffolk, and mon carrier, hy motor vehicle, over ir­ Westchester Counties, N.Y., and points I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and regular routes, transporting: Canned in Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Hudson, and processed foodstuffs, from Collins­ Union, Somerset, Middlesex, and Morris 766, from points in Colfax County, Nebr., Counties, N.J., (3) from New York, N.Y. to points in Indiana, Michigan, and ville, HU to points in Iowa. Note: Ap­ Ohio. Note: Common control may be plicant holds contract carrier authority to Saddle Brook, N.J., and returned, re­ in MC 116434 and subs thereunder, there­ jected, and damaged shipments on re­ involved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ sary, applicant requests it be held at fore dual operations may be involved. turn. Note: Applicant states the pro­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ posed operations will be under contract fY in g Vi o W p h f No. MC 124236 (Sub-No. 18), filed Feb­ cant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. with Prentice-Hall, Inc., at a new loca­ No. MC 125764 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ tion in West Nyack, N.Y. If a hearing is ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL deemed necessary, applicant requests it EXPRESS, INC., 3300 Republic National ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: LILAC CITY Bank Building, Dallas, Tex., 75201. Ap­ EXPRESS, INC., East 10222 4th Avenue, be held at New York, N.Y. . Spokane, Wash. Applicant’s representa­ No. MC 123934 (Sub-No. 11), filed Feb­ plicant’s representative: William D. ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: KREVDA White, Jr., 2505 Republic National Bank tive: Donald A. Ericson, Suite 708, Old BROS. EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box Tower, Dallas, Tex., 75201. Authority National Bank Building, Spokane 1, sought to operate as a common carrier, Wash. Authority sought to operate as a 68, Gas City, Ind. Applicant’s repre­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over sentative: Donald W. Smith, Suite 511 by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Cement, in bulk, from irregular routes, transporting: Canned Fidelity Building, Indianapolis, Ind., and bottled foodstuffs, from points in 46204. Authority sought to operate as a Douro (Ector County), Tex., to points in contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over Oklahoma. Note : If a hearing is deemed Solano and Santa Clara Counties, Calif., irregular routes, transporting: Glass necessary applicant requests it be held at to points in Spokane County, Wash. containers, from Knox, Parker, Marien- DdllSiS Tex • Note: Applicant states it proposes to No. MC 124834 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ transport exempt commodities on re­ ville and points in Elk Township, Clarion ruary 3, 1966. Appliant: COFFEE turn. If a hearing is deemed necessary, County, Pa., to Des Moines, Iowa, and TRANSPORT CORPORATION, 345 But­ applicant requests it be held at Spokane, pallets and skids, on return. Note : Ap­ ler Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. Applicant’s Wash. plicant has a pending common carrier representative: George A. Olsen, 69 Ton- No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 6), filed Feb­ application in MC 127705. If a hearing nele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J., 07306. ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: ERICKSON is deemed necessary, applicant requests Authority sought to operate as a con­ REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT COR­ it be held at Indianapolis, Ind., Pitts­ tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ PORATION, 6801L Street, Omaha, Nebr. burgh, Pa., or Chicago, HI. regular routes, transporting: (1) Frozen Authority sought to operate as a com­ No. MC 123934 (Sub-No. 12), filed Feb­ foods, and edible nuts (a) between Carl- mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ ruary 7, 1966. Applicant:' KREVDA stadt, N.J., and New York, N.Y., and (b) regular routes, transporting: Frozen BROS. EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box between New York, N.Y., on the foods and potato products, not frozen, 68, Gas City, Ind. Applicant’s repre­ one hand, and, on the other, points in from Robbinsville, N.J., to points in Illi­ sentative: Donald W. Smith, Suite 511 New Jersey and (2) coffee, between New nois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Fidelity Building, Indianapolis, Ind., York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, 46204. Authority sought to operate as other, points in New Jersey. Note: If a contract carrier, by motpr vehicle, over Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin, a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant and the District of Columbia. Note: If irregular routes, transporting: Glass requests it be held at Washington, D.C. a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ containers, from points in Elk Township, No. MC 125117 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ cant does not specify a location. Clarion County, Pa., to points in Indiana, ruary 2, 1966. Applicant: CLAUDE Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ken­ No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 7), filed Feb­ HAYES, doing business as BROWNING ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: ERICKSON tucky, and St. Louis, Mo., and points in TRUCK LINE, Ohio and Washington New York on and west of a line begin­ REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORP., Streets, Clinton, Mo. Applicant’s repre­ 6801 L Street, Omaha, Nebr. Authority ning at the New York-Pennsylvania sentative: Joseph R. Nacy, 117 West High State line and extending along U.S. sought to operate as a common carrier, Street, Jefferson City, Mo., 65101. Au­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Highway 11 to Binghamton, N.Y., thence thority sought to operate as a common along New York Highway 12 to Clayton, transporting: Meats, meat products, carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular meat byproducts, and articles distributed N.Y., and pallets and skids, on return. routes, transporting: General commodi­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, by meat packinghouses, as described in ties (except classes A and B explosives, sections A and C of appendix I to the applicant requests it be held at Indian­ those of unusual value, household goods apolis, Ind., Pittsburgh, Pa., or Wash­ report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier as defined by the Commission, commodi­ Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from ington, D.C. ties in bulk, commodities requiring spe­ No. MC 124078 (Sub-No. 187), filed Salina, Kans., to points in Maine, Ver­ cial equipment, and those injurious or mont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, February 7,1966. Applicant: SCHWER- contaminating to other lading), (1) be­ MAN TRUCKING CO., a corporation, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, tween points in the Kansas City, Mo.- New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, 611 South 28th Street, Milwaukee, Wis., Kansas City, Kans., commercial zone and 53246. Applicant’s representative: Delaware, Ohio, Michigan, and Wash­ Warsaw, Mo.; from points in the Kansas ington, D.C. Note: If a hearing is James R. Ziperski (same address as ap­ City, Mo.-Kansas City, Kans., commer­ deemed necessary, applicant did not plicant). Authority sought to operate cial zone over U.S. Highway 50 to Sedalia, specify a location. as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Mo., thence over U.S. Highway 65 to over irregular routes, transporting: Warsaw, and return over the same route, No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 8), filed Chemicals, in bulk, from Memphis, serving aU intermediate points, and serv­ February 4, 1966. Applicant: ERICK­ Tenn., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, ing the off-route points of Ionia, Cole SON REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Mis­ Camp, and Kaysinger Dam; and (2) CORPORATION, 6801 L Street, Omaha, sissippi. Note: If a hearing is deemed between Clinton, Mo., and Lincoln, Mo., Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a necessary, applicant requests it be held from Clinton over Missouri Highway 7 common carrier, by motor vehicle, over at Chicago, m. to junction Henry Comity Route C, irregular routes, transporting: Food­ No. MC 124211 (Sub-No. 87), filed Feb­ thence over Henry County Route C and stuffs, from Westfield, N.Y., and North ruary 7,1966. Applicant: HILT TRUCK Benton County Route C to Lincoln, and East, Pa., to points in Colorado, Iowa, LINE, INC., 3751 Simmer Street, Post return over the same route, serving no Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Office Box 824, Lincoln 1, Nebr. Au­ intermediate points. Note: If a hearing and Wisconsin. Note: If a hearing is

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3162 NOTICES deemed necessary, applicant does not Candy Corp., Atlanta, Ga.; (3) raw ma­ specify a particular location. INC., 1101 Kipling Road, Elizabeth, N.J. terials, necessary in the manufacture Applicant’s representative: Herpaan B. J No. MC 126094 (Sub-No. 5), filed Feb­ and shipping of candy (to include but Weckstein, 1060 Broad Street, Newark ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: ARTHUR not be limited to sugar, peanuts, coconut, 2, N.J. Authority sought to operate as a TROTZKE, Post Office Box 126, Farmers- corn syrup, packaging and shipping ma­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over burg, Ind. Applicant’s representative: terials), from points in Texas, Louisiana, irregular routes, transporting: Jewelry, Robert T. Lawley, 306-308 Reisch Build­ Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia, and materials and supplies used in the ing, Springfield, 111., 62701. Authority Arizona, and California, to Atlanta, Ga.; manufacture or repair of jewelry, ster­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, (4) dry chemicals, packaged in paper ling, and plated silverware, in packages by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, bags and drums, between the plantsites or envelopes not exceeding 35 pounds, transporting: Unfinished lumber and of Mayo Chemical Co., located in Smyrna between points in New Jersey on and scaled logs, for the account of National and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, north of New Jersey Highway 526, on the Lumber Co., between points in Kentucky, Tenn.; (5) dry chemicals, packaged in one hand, and, on the other, points in the Michigan, and Indiana. N o te: If a paper bags and drums, from the plant- New York, N.Y., commercial zone as de­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant sites of Mayo Chemical Co. in Smyrna fined by the Commission in 1 M.C.C. 665. requests it be held at Springfield, 111. and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 126724 (Sub-No. 6), filed Feb­ Tenn., to customers of Mayo Chemical applicant requests it be held at Newark ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: DOBSON Co., located at points in the United N.J. MILK TRANSIT, INC., Box 206, Orford- States (excluding points in Alaska and No. MC 127899, filed February 2, 1966. ville, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Hawaii); (6) defective, rejected or re­ Applicant: JAMES H. CHENEY, doing David J. MacDougall, One East Milwau­ possessed chemical products, manufac­ business as L. A. BOAT MOVERS, 1026 kee, Suite 305, Janesville, Wis., "53545. tured by Mayo Chemical Co., from cus­ Cristobal Avenue, Wilmington, Calif., Authority sought to operate as a con­ tomers of Mayo Chemical Co., located at 90744. Authority sought to operate as a tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ points in the United States (excluding common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: Dairy prod­ points in Alaska and Hawaii), to the irregular routes, transporting: Boats, ucts, as described in section B of ap­ plantsites of the Mayo Chemical Co. lo­ between points in Los Angeles, Orange, pendix I to the report in Descriptions in cated in Smyrna and Dalton, Ga., and and San Bernardino Counties, Calif., the Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 Chattanooga, Tenn.; (7) dry chemicals, port of entry on the international bound­ and 766, in shipper owned trailers, for manufactured, packaged in paper bags ary line between the United States and the account of Bancroft Dairy, from and drums, from suppliers of Mayo Mexico, located at Calexico, Calif., boat Madison, Wis., to points in Florida. Chemical Co., located at points in Ohio, landings in Nevada, located on the shores N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, of Lake Mead, boat landings on the- applicant requests it be held at Madison, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Del­ Arizona and Nevada shores of Lake Wis. aware, Maryland, West Virginia, and Mojave, at or near Davis Dam, and Bull­ No. MC 127042 (Sub-No. 13), filed Texas, to customers of Mayo Chemical head City, Ariz. N o te: If a hearing is January 28, 1966. Applicant: HAGEN, Co., located at points in the United deemed necessary, applicant requests it INC., 4120 Floyd Street, Sioux City, Iowa. States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii); be held at Los Angeles, Calif. Applicant’s representative: J. Max and (8) dry chemicals, packaged in paper No. MC 127900, filed January 21, 1966. Harding, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, bags and drums, for reprocessing or Applicant: GROOME TRANSPORTA­ Nebr., 68501. Authority sought ,to op­ manufacture of company chemical prod­ TION, INC., Richmond Byrd Airport, erate as a common carrier, by motor ucts, from suppliers of the Mayo Chemi­ Sandston, Va. Applicant’s representa­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cal Co. located in the origin States listed tive: M. B. Morgan, 201 Azar Building, ing: Meat, meat products, meat byprod­ in (7) above, to the plantsites of Mayo Glen Burnie, Md., 21061. Authority ucts and articles distributed by meat Chemical Co., located in Smyrna and sought to operate as a common carrier, packinghouses, as described in sections Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, A and C of appendix I to the Report in N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, transporting: General commodities (ex­ Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certif­ applicant requests it be held at Atlanta, cept dangerous articles, commodities in icates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except Ga. bulk, commodities requiring special hides and commodities in bulk in tank No. MC 127806 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ equipment, commodities contaminating vehicles), from York, Nebr., to points in ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: BEER to other lading, and household goods), Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minne­ TRANSPORT, INC., 88 River Street, between Friendship Airport, Glen Bur­ sota, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Bridgeport, Conn. Applicant’s repre­ nie, Md., Dulles Airport, Chantilly, Va., South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. sentative: A. David Millner, 1060 Broad National Airport, Arlington, Va., Byrd N o te: Applicant holds contract carrier Street, Newark, N.J., 07102. Authority Airport, Sandston, Va., Patrick Henry authority in MC 115915, therefore dual sought to operate as a contract carrier, Airport, Warwick, Va., and Norfolk operations may be involved. If a hear­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Municipal Airport, Norfolk, Va. N o te: ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ transporting: Malt beverages in contain­ Applicant states the proposed service to quests it be held at Omaha, Nebr. ers (other than in bulk, in tank vehicles) be restricted to freight having prior or No. MC 127681 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ and advertising materials and displays, subsequent movements by air, and to ruary 1, 1966. Applicant: JOE JONES, from the plantsites of Rheingold Brew­ shipments received from or delivered to JR., doing business as JOE JONES eries, Inc., in New York, N.Y., and Orange, airlines or air freight forwarders at TRUCKING CO., 9 1/2 Ashby Street NW., N.J., to West Hartford, Willimantic, aforementioned airports, and further re­ Atlanta, Ga. Applicant’s representa­ Fairfield, Torrington, and Norwalk, stricted to be applicable only on traffic tive: Glover McGhee, 1614 Fulton Na­ Conn., and Medford, West Bridgewater, moving on air bills of lading. If a hear­ tional Bank Building, Atlanta, Ga., Framingham, Somerville, and Lawrence, ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ 30303. Authority sought to operate as a Mass., and empty containers and pallets quests it be held at Richmond, Va. contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over used for the transportation of such malt No. MC 127901, filed January 24, 1966. irregular routes, transporting: (1) beverages, and returned and rejected Applicant: ELROY V. GRIFFIN, High­ Candy, from Atlanta, Ga., to points in shipments on return. N o te: Applicant way 79 East, Paris, Tenn. Authority South Carolina, North Carolina, Vir­ states the proposed operations will be per­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, ginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, formed under a continuing contract with by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, the Rheingold Breweries, Inc., Brooklyn, transporting: Clay and clay products, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio, Illi­ N.Y., and C. Carbone & Co., Somerville, from points in Tennessee and Kentucky nois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Mass. If a hearing is deemed necessary, west of the Tennessee River to points in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, applicant requests it be held at New Virginia, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Ken­ and Alabama; (2) defective, rejected and York, N.Y. tucky, Missouri, Indiana, and Tennessee. repossessed candy products, from points No. MC 127896 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, in the destination States specified in (1) ruary 4,1966. Applicant: NEW JERSEY applicant requests it be held at Paris, above, to the plantsite of the Sophie Mae JEWELERS MESSENGER SERVICE, Tenn.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3163 No. MC 127913, filed February 7, 1966. No. MC 127902, filed January 26, 1966. transporting: Treated piling, treated ]bridge timbers, treated lumber and Applicant: BROADUS W. GOODE, do­ Applicant: M. L. DIETZ, doing business ing business as GOODE MOTOR LINES, as DIETZ MOTOR LINES, Post Office treated post, from Fordyce, Ark., to points in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Route 3, Forest City, N.C. Applicant’s Box 757, Hickory, N.C. Applicant’s rep­ representative: Boyce A. Whitmire, Hen­ resentative: H. Overton Hemp, Room Missouri, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and Ar­ kansas. N o te: If a hearing is deemed dersonville, N.C. Authority sought to 101, 327 North Tryon Street, Post Office operate as a common carrier, by motor Box 20202, Charlotte, N.C., 28202. Au-n. necessary, applicant requests it be held at Fordyce, Ark. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ thority sought to operate as a common ing: Used automobiles, requiring special carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 127909, filed February 3, 1966. Applicant J. SUPOR TRUCKING CO., equipment, (1) from* Baltimore, Md., routes, transporting: New furniture, Philadelphia, Pa., and Washington, D.C., from points in Alexander, Burke, Cald­ INC., 83 Charlton Avenue, Lodi, N.J. Applicant’s representative: George A. to points in Rutherford County, N.C., well, Catawba, Lincoln, and Iredell Coun­ (2) from points in Rutherford County, ties, N.C., to points in Alabama, and Olsen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J., 07306. Authority sought to operate N.C., to Bristol, Tenn., and (3) from rejected, refused, and damaged ship­ Bristol, Tenn., to points in Rutherford ments on retdrn. Note: If a hearing is as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Iron County, N.C. N o te: If a hearing is. deemed necessary, applicant requests it deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Charlotte, N.C. and steel bars, rods, sheejts, angles, plates, No. MC 127903, filed January 28, 1966. and structural steel, between Harrison, be held at Charlotte, N.C. Applicant: H & M TRANSPORT CO., N.J., on the one.hand, and, on the other, No. MC 127918, filed February 2, 1966. INC., Rudd, Iowa. Applicant’s repre­ Philadelphia, Pa., and points in New Applicant; MARVIN R. SHOOP, doing sentative: Clayton L. Wornson, 206 Brick York. N ote : Applicant states the pro­ business as ELMWOOD TRANSFER, 204 and Tile Building, Mason City, Iowa. posed operation will be performed under West Evergreen, Elmwood, 111., 61529. Authority sought to operate as a com­ a continuing contract with Newark Steel Applicant’s representative: John W. mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ Warehouse, Inc., Harrison, N.J. If a Murray, 1370 Frank Street, Galesburg, ular routes, transporting: Anhydrous hearing is deemed necessary, applicant 111. Authority sought to operate as a ammonia, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from requests it be held at Washington, D.C. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Gamer, Iowa, and points within five (5) No. MC 127910, filed February 7, 1966. regular routes, transporting: General miles thereof, and Muscatine, Iowa, to Applicant: C.B.W. TRANSPORT SERV­ commodities (except those of unusual points in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North ICE, INC., Post Office Box 48, Hedge value, and except classes A and B ex­ Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. Road, Wood River, 111. Applicant’s rep­ plosives, household goods as defined in N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, resentative: Ernest A. Brooks II, 1301- Practices of Motor Common Carriers of applicant does not specify a location. 02 Ambassador Building, St. Louis, Mo., Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, com­ No. MC 127905, filed February 1, 63101. Authority sought to operate as modities in bulk, and commodities re­ 1966. Applicant: LYNN H. SCOTT, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over quiring special equipment), (1) between 8533 Blossvale Road, Blossvale, N.Y., irregular routes transporting: Petroleum Peoria and Gilson, 111.; from Peoria over 13308. Applicant’s representative: products, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Illinois Highway 8 to junction County Herbert M. Canter, Mezzanine, Warren Wood River, 111., and points within five Road (commonly called Gilson Corner), Parking Center, 345 South Warren (5) miles thereof, to points in Arkansas, and thence over County Road approxi­ Street, Syracuse, N.Y., 13202. Authority Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mich­ mately y* mile to Gilson, and return over sought to operate as a common carrier, igan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, the same route, serving all intermediate by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennes­ points, and the off-route point of Peabody transporting: Sand, from the town of see, Wisconsin, Georgia, Texas, and West Coal Co., Edwards Mine, near Edwards, Annsville (Oneida County), N.Y. and Virginia. N ote: Applicant is also au­ 111., (2) between Peoria and Victoria, 111.; the town of Fort Edward (Washington thorized to conduct operations as a con­ from Peoria over U.S. Highway 150 to County), N.Y., to points in New York, tract carrier in Permit No. MC 115975, junction Illinois Highway 78, thence over Connecticut, Delaware, the District of and subs thereunder; therefore, dual op­ Illinois Highway 78 to West Jersey, 111., Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachu­ erations may be involved. Applicant thence over County Road to junction setts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, states no duplicating authority is sought. Illinois Highway 180, thence over Illinois Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Highway 180 to junction Illinois High­ Virginia, and West Virginia. N ote: If cant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., way 167, and thence over Illinois High­ a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ or Chicago, HI. way 167 to Victoria, and return over the cant requests it be held at Syracuse, No. MC 127912, filed February 7, 1966. same route, serving all intermediate N.Y. Applicant: RICHARDSON LUMBER points, (3) between Peoria, 111., and junc­ No. MC 127906, filed February 1, 1966. CO., INC., Otter Creek, Maine. Appli­ tion Illinois Highways 180 and 1 67; from Applicant: HENRY A. BRUBAKER, 122 cant’s representative: V. Baker Smith, Peoria over U.S. Highway 150 to junction South Grant Street, Manheim, Pa. Ap­ 2107 Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Build­ Illinois Highway 180, and thence over plicant’s representative: John M. Mus- ing, Philadelphia, Pa., 19109. Author­ Illinois Highway 180 to junction Illinois selman, 400 North Third Street, Post Of­ ity sought to operate as a contract car­ Highway 167, and return over the same fice Box 46, Harrisburg, Pa., 17108. Au­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular route, serving all intermediate points, thority sought to operate as a contract routes, transporting: (1) Lumber, from and (4) between junction Illinois High­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Ellsworth, Rockwood, Wiscasset, and ways 8 and 78 and junction U.S. High­ routes, transporting: Building materials, Ashland, Maine, and the port of entry way 150 and Illinois Highway 78, over electrical and gas appliances, and equip­ on the international boundary line be­ Illinois Highway 78, serving no inter­ ment and parts, from points in Ephrata tween the United States and Canada mediate points, as an alternate route for Township, Lancaster County, Pa., to located at or near Champlain, N.Y., to operating convenience only, in connec­ points in Delaware, Maryland, and New points in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and tion with the proposed routes in (1), (2), Jersey. N o te: Applicant states service Long Island, N.Y., and (2) lumber, from and (3), above. N o t e : If a hearing is will be performed under a continuing the ports of entry on the international deemed necessary, applicant requests it contract or contracts with the Wickes boundary line between the United States be held at Springfield, 111. Lumber Co., Division of the Wickes and Canada located at or near Jack- No. MC 127922, filed January 27, 1966. Corp., Saginaw, Mich. If a hearing is man Station, Corburn Gore, and Calais, Applicant: NELLO PISTORESI & SON, deemed necessary, applicant requests it Maine, to points in Maine. N ote : Appli­ INC., Hospital Road and Washington be held at Harrisburg, Pa. cant states the proposed operations will PSH 22 (Post Office Box 432), Toppenish, No. MC 127907, filed February 1, 1966. be performed under a continuing con­ Wash. Authority sought to operate as a Applicant: RAYMOND CEARLEY, doing tract or contracts with Philip Carchman, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over business as CEARLEY TRANSPORTA­ doing business as Salem Forest Products. irregular routes, transporting: Wood TION CO., Kingsland, Ark. Authority If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ shavings, loose, or in bales or bags, and sought to operate as a contract carrier, cant requests it be held at Washington, straw, loose, or in bales or bags, from by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, D.C. or Philadelphia, Pa. points in Yakima and Kittitas Counties,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 No. 38------8 3164 NOTICES

Wash., to points in Umatilla, Wallowa, man Building, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Canyon, Ariz. N o te: The purpose o f Union, and Baker Counties, Oreg. N ote : Authority sought to operate as a con­ this republication is to more clearly set Applicant states it proposes to transport tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ forth the territory description. I f a ordinary livestock (exempt) , on return. regular routes, transporting: Fertilizer, hearing is deemed necessary, applicant If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ fertilizer materials, and agricultural in­ requests it be held at Las Vegas, Nev. cant requests it be held at Yakima, secticides, fungicides and herbicides, No. MC 127822, filed December 13, Wash. from Fostoria and Canton, Ohio, to 1965. Applicant: CHRIS T. DODSON No. MC 127923, filed February 4, 1966. points in that part of Pennsylvania on AND DON LANDERS, doing business as Applicant: CASE MOTOR CORP., 835 and west of a line beginning at the New MERCURY BUS LINE, a partnership, Lenox Avenue, Miami Beach, Fla. Ap­ York-Pennsylvania State line, thence 1916 Oak Street, Lawton, Okla. Appli­ plicant’s representative: Robert M. Mc- along Pennsylvania Highway 46 to junc­ cant’s representative: E. Mac Townsend, Closky, Suite 501, 350 Lincoln Road, tion U.S. Highway 120, thence along U.S. 121 North Ninth Street, Post Office Box Miami Beach, Fla. Authority sought Highway 120 to junction U.S. Highway 638, Frederick, Okla., 73542. Authority to operate as a common carrier, by 219, thence along U.S. Highway 219 to sought to operate as a common carrier, motor vehicle, over irregular routes, the Pennsylvania-West Virginia State by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: Motor vehicles, with and line, including points on the specified transporting: Passengers and their bag­ without baggage, personal effects and highways. N ote: Applicant states that gage, and express, mail, and newspapers, pets in driveaway service, between points the above proposed operation is to be in the same vehicle with passengers, from in Florida, on the one hand, and, on under a continuing contract or contracts Lawton, Okla., to Frederick Okla.; from the other, points in the United States with Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., of Lawton over Interstate Highway 277 to including Alaska but excluding Hawaii. Oklahoma City, Okla. If a hearing is junction Oklahoma Highway 36, thence N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, deemed necessary, applicant requests over Oklahoma Highway 36 to junction applicant requests it be held at Miami, that it be held at Columbus, Ohio. Oklahoma Highway 5, and thence over Fla. No. MC 127930, filed February 2, 1966. Oklahoma Highway 5 to Frederick, and No. MC 127924, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: WARRENVILLE CARTAGE return over the same route, serving the Applicant: EMIL BECKER, doing busi­ CO., INC., Box 388, Warrenville, 111. Au­ intermediate points of Faxon and Chat­ ness as BECKER TRUCKING CO., thority sought to operate as a common tanooga, Okla., restricted against trans­ 5482 Mill Creek Boulevard, Boardman, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular portation of passengers and express be­ Ohio, 44512. Applicant’s representative: routes, transporting: General commodi­ tween Lawton, Okla., and Chattanooga, Richard H. Brandon, Hartman Build­ ties (except livestock, household goods, Okla., and intermediate points, except ing, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Authority appliances, explosives, and commodities traffic originating in Frederick, Okla. sought to operate as a contract carrier, of unusual value), between points in N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Winnebago, Boone, McHenry, Lake, Lee, applicant requests it be held at Lawton transporting: Slag, in bulk, in dump ve­ Bureau, La Salle, De Kalb, Will, Du Page, or Oklahoma City, Okla. hicles (1) from points in Lawrence Cook, Kankakee, Grundy, Livingston, County, Pa., to points in Columbiana, Kendall, and Ogle Counties, HI., and A pplications for B rokerage Licenses Mahoning, and Trumbull Counties, Ohio, Porter, and Lake Counties, Ind. N o te: MOTOR CARRIER OF PASSENGERS and (2) from points in Mahoning and If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Trumbull Counties, Ohio, to points in cant requests it be held at Chicago, HI. No. MC 12600 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ Beaver, Butler, Crawford, Lawrence, ruary 3, 1966. Applicant: HATTIE Mercer and Venango Counties, Pa., and M otor Carriers of P assengers MAGDALENE KELVINGTON, doing points in Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chau­ No. MC 1934 (Sub-No. 21), filed Feb­ business as KELVINGTON TOURS AND tauqua, Erie, and Onondaga Counties, ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: THE ARROW TRAVEL SERVICE, 108 South Walnut N.Y. N o te: Applicant states that the LINE, INC., 70 Florence Street, East Street, East Palestine, Ohio. Applicant’s operations will be conducted under con­ Hartford, Conn. Applicant’s representa­ representative: Earl N. Merwin, 85 East tract with the Standard Slag Co., tive: Thomas W. Murrett, 410 Asylum Gay Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Youngstown, Ohio. If a hearing is Street, Hartford, Conn. Authority For a license (BMC 5) to engage in oper­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it sought to operate as a common carrier, ations as a broker at East Palestine, be held at Columbus, Ohio. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Ohio, in arranging for transportation by No. MC 127926, filed February 7, 1966. transporting: Passengers and their bag­ motor vehicle in interstate or foreign Applicant: DEL VALLE EXPRESS gage when moved in the same vehicle commerce of Passengers and their bag­ CORP., 3133 Broadway, New York, N.Y. therewith, in special round-trip opera­ gage, in special or charter operations, in Authority sought to operate as a com­ tions, between New Haven and Water- round-trip tours, beginning and ending mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over regu­ bury, Conn., on the one hand, and, on at points in Columbiana, Mahoning, lar routes, transporting: Household the other, Suffolk Downs Race Track, Jefferson, and Carroll Counties, Ohio, goods as defined by the Commission, (1) Boston, Mass. N ote: If a hearing is and extending to points in the United from New York, N.Y., to Hartford, Conn., deemed necessary, applicant requests it States west of the Mississippi River, in­ as follows: From New York over Bruck­ be held at New Haven, Conn. cluding Alaska. ner Boulevard to junction Interstate No. MC 109148 (Sub-No. 20) (Amend­ F reight F orwarder A pplications Highway 95, thence over Interstate ment), filed October 5, 1965, published No. FF—331 BEKINS MOVING & Highway 95 to junction Interstate in F ederal R egister issue of October 21, Highway 91, and thence over Interstate 1965, as amended February 14, 1966, and STORAGE CO. (Washington corpo­ Highway 91 to Hartford, and return over republished as amended, this issue. Ap­ ration) Freight Forwarder Application— the same route, serving the intermediate plicant: LAS VEGAS-TONOPAH-RENO filed January 14, 1966, amended Febru­ points of Stamford and Bridgeport, STAGE LINE, INC., 917 Stewart Street, ary 9, 1966. Applicant: BEKINS Conn.; and (2) between New York, N.Y., Las Vegas, Nev. Applicant’s represent­ MOVING & STORAGE CO., a Washing­ and Newark, N.J., as follows: Over city ative: Richard R. Hanna, Post Office Box ton corporation, 9401 Aurora Avenue streets, through the Lincoln Tunnel to 648, Carson City, Nev. Authority sought North, Seattle, Wash. Applicant’s rep­ the New Jersey Turnpike, thence over to operate as a common carrier, by motor resentative: Floyd L. Newland, Suite the New Jersey Turnpike to Newark, N.J., vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ 1210, 1411 4th Avenue Building, Seattle, serving the intermediate points of Jer­ ing : Passengers and their baggage, in the Wash., 98101. Authority sought under sey City and Union City, N.J. N ote: If same vehicle with passengers, in special section 410, Part IV of the Interstate a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ operations, (1) between Las Vegas, Nev., Commerce Act to extend operations as a cant requests it be held at New York, and points within ten (10) air-line miles freight forwarder in interstate or foreign N.Y. thereof, on the one hand, and, on the commerce, through use of the facilities No. MC 127927, filed February 7, 1966. other, Hoover Dam, Ariz., and (2) be­ of common carriers by railroad, express, Applicant: ROLAN D. FELLER, Zoar- tween Las Vegas, Nev., and points within water or motor vehicle in the transpor­ ville, Ohio, 44698. Applicant’s repre­ ten (10) air-line miles thereof, on the tation of used household goods only from sentative: Richard H. Brandon, Hart­ one hand, and, on the other, Grand points in Washington, Oregon, and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3165

Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 named in the F ederal R egister publica­ Idaho, to points in the United States tion, within 15 calendar days after the (including Alaska and Hawaii). in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half date notice of the filing of the applica­ A pplications in W h ich H andling W it h ­ mile south of junction Minnesota High­ tion is published in the F ederal R egister. out O ral H earing H as B een R equested ways 49 and 55; (5) manufactured fertil­ One copy of such protest must be served on the applicant, or its authorized rep­ MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY izer, from the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota resentative, if any, and the protest must lio. MC 43421 (Sub-No. 32), filed Feb­ Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota certify that such service has been made. ruary 4, 1966. Applicant: DOHRN County, Minn., located approximately The protest must be specific as to the TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, one-half mile south of junction Minne­ service which such protestant can and Post Office Box 1237, Rock Island, 111., sota Highways 49 and 55, to Baldwin, will offer, and must consist of a signed 61202. Applicant’s representative: Wis., and points within 15 miles of Bald­ original and six (6) copies. David Axelrod, 39 South La Salle Street, win; (6) general commodities (except A copy of the application is on file, Chicago, 111. Authority sought to oper­ those of unusual value, classes A and B and can be examined, at the Office of the ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ explosives, commodities in bulk, com­ Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com­ hicle, over regular routes, transporting: modities requiring special equipment, mission, Washington, D.C., and also in General commodities (except those of and those injurious or contaminating to the field office to which protests are to unusual value, livestock, classes A and other lading), between points in the be transmitted. B explosives, household goods, as de­ towns of Hammond, Rush River, Pleas­ M otor Carriers of P roperty fined by the Commission, commodities ant Valley, Warren, and Erin Prairrie, in bulk, and commodities requiring spe­ located in St. Croix County, Wis., on the No. MC 61401 (Sub-No. 10 TA), filed cial equipment), serving the site of a one hand, and, on the other, the site of February 16, 1966. Applicant: MARX terminal proposed to be constructed by the Spector Freight System, Inc., ter­ TRUCK LINE, INC., Third and Plymouth Spector Freight System, Inc., located on minal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Streets, Sioux City, Iowa, 51101. Ap­ Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Town­ Township, Dakota County, Minn., located plicant’s representative: R. W. Wigton, ship, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of 710 Badgerow Building, Sioux City, Iowa, approximately one-half (V2 ) mile south junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55; 51101. Authority sought to operate as a of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and (7) refrigerators, coolers, and cooling contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over 55, as an off-route point in connection equipment, /rom River Falls and Roberts, irregular routes, transporting: Meats, with applicant’s regular route operations. Wis., to the site of the Spector Freight meat products, meat byproducts and No. MC 5117 (Sub-No. 14), filed Feb­ System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota articles distributed by meat packing­ ruary 7, 1966. Applicant: VAN SOMER- Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota houses, as described in sections A and C EN TRANSFER, INC., Baldwin, Wis. County, Minn., located approximately of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ Applicant’s representative: David Axel­ one-half mile south of junction Minne­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 rod, 39 South La Salle Street, Chicago, sota Highways 49 and 55, and, (8) equip­ M. C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities 111., 60603. Authority sought to operate ment, materials, and supplies used in the in bulk in tank vehicles), from Sioux as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, manufacture of the above specified com­ City, Iowa, to points in Illinois (except over regular and irregular routes, trans­ modities, from the site of the Spector Bushnell, Chicago, and Rochelle), Min­ porting: Regular: (1) General commodi­ Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minne­ nesota, and Wisconsin (except Madison ties (except those of unusual value, sota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Da­ and Milwaukee), for 180 days. Support­ classes A and B explosives, manufactured kota County, Minn., located approxi­ ing shippers: Swift & Co., 115 West Jack- fertilizer, household goods as defined by mately one-half mile south of junction son Boulevard, Chicago, 111., 60604; Floyd the Commission, commodities in bulk, Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to River Valley Packing Co., Sioux City, Iowa, and commodities requiring special equip­ Falls and Roberts, Wis. 51107; Rasking Packing Co., Inc., Post ment) , serving the site of a terminal pro­ No. MC 127919, filed February 1, 1966. Office Box 4, Stockyard Station, Sioux posed to be constructed by Spector Applicant: ANDRE FISETTE, 405 St. City, Iowa, 51106; Needham Packing Co., Freight System, Inc., on Minnesota High­ Paul Street, Coaticook, Quebec, Canada. Inc., Sioux City Dressed Beef Division, way 49 in Egan Township, Dakota Coun­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ 1911 Warrington Road, Sioux City, Iowa, ty, Minn., located approximately one- mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ 51107; Sioux Quality Packers, Inc., Post half mile south of junction Minnesota regular routes, transporting: Lumber, Office Box 25, Stockyards Station, Sioux Highways 49 and 55, as an off-route from the ports of entry on the interna­ City, Iowa, 51107. Send protests to: points in connection with applicant’s reg­ tional boundary line between the United Carroll Russell, District Supervisor, Bu­ ular route operations. Irregular routes: States and Canada, at or near Norton reau of Operations and Compliance, In­ (2) feed and grain, from the site of the and Derby, Vt., to points in Massachu­ terstate Commerce Commission, 304 Post Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on setts and Vermont. Office Building, Sioux City, Iowa, 51101. Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Town­ No. MC 100666 (Sub-No. 79 TA), filed ship, Dakota County, Minn., located ap­ By the Commission. February 16,1966. Applicant: MELTON proximately one-half mile south of junc­ [seal] H. N eil G arson, TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box tion Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to Secretary. 7295, Shreveport, La., 71107. Applicant’s Hammond, Woodville, and Spring Valley, representative: Max Morgan, 443 Ameri­ Wis.; (3) farm machinery and twine, [F.R. Doc. 66-1953; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; can Building, Oklahoma City, Okla. Au­ from the site of the Spector Freight Sys­ 8:45 a.m.] thority sought to operate as a common tem, Inc., terminal on Minnesota High­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular way 49 in Egan Township, Dakota Coun­ routes, transporting: Roofing and siding ty, Minn., located approximately one-half [Notice 135] products, including materials and acces­ mile south of junction Minnesota High­ MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY sories incidental to the application there­ ways 49 and 55, to points in the towns AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS of, from Camden, Ark., to points in Mis­ of Forest, Glenwood, Springfield, Cady, sissippi, for 180 days. Supporting ship­ Eau Galle, Baldwin, Emerald, Cylon, F e b r u a r y 21,1966. per: Allied Chemical Corp., Barrett Erin Prairie, Hammond, Rush River, The following are notices of filing of Division, 40 Rector Street, New York, Pleasant Valley, Kinnickinnic, Warren, applications for temporary authority un­ N. Y., 10006, F. A. Kwiatkowshi, traffic Richmond, and Hudson, located in St. der section 210a(a) of the Interstate manager of Barrett Division of Allied Croix County, Wis., not including the in­ Commerce Act provided for under the Chemicals. Send protests to:. William corporated cities or villages of New Rich­ new rules in Ex Parte No. MC 67, (49 R. Atkins, District Supervisor, Bureau of mond, Glenwood, Wilson, Woodville, Deer CFR Part. 240), published in the F ederal Operations and Compliance, Interstate Park, and Hudson. R egister, issue of April 27,1965, effective Commerce Commission, T-4009 Federal (4) Empty containers, from Baldwin, July 1, 1965. These rules provide that Office Building, New Orleans, La., 70113. Hammond, Woodville, and Roberts, Wis., protests to the granting of an applica­ No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 357 TA), filed to the site of the Spector Freight System, tion must be filed with the field official February 16, 1966. Applicant: ALTER-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3166 NOTICES

MAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., 2424 troit, Mich., for 180 days. Support­ No. MC 127946 TA, filed February 16 Northwest 46th Street, Post Office Box ing shipper: Anamet Corp., 13460 1966. Applicant: MARTIN ALAN, INC., 458, Allapattah Station, Miami, Fla., Klinger Avenue, Detroit, Mich., Harold Rural Route No. 4, Post Office Box 780, 33142. Applicant’s representative: Ford F. Moran, president. Send protests to: 13th and Ferguson Road, Fort Wayne’, W. Sewell (same address as above). Au­ J. A. Niggemyer, District Supervisor, Bu­ Ind. Applicant’s representative: Robert thority sought to operate as a common reau of Operations and Compliance, W. Loser, 409 Chamber of Commerce carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Interstate Commerce Commission, 531 Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Au­ routes, transporting: Juices and drinks Hawley Building, Wheeling, W. Va., thority sought to operate as a contract or "beverages (other than citrus), not re­ 26003. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular quiring refrigeration, from Bradenton No. MC 127935 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed routes, transporting: Film, flash lamps, and Cocoa (Port Canaveral), Fla., to February 16, 1966. Applicant: ELIZA­ photographic supplies, supplies used in points in Ohio, Indiana, Lower Peninsula BETH J. MOORE, doing business as the printing or reproduction industries, of Michigan, and Chicago, 111., for 180 AUTO DRIVEAWAY CO., 612 Americus picture frames and similar decorative days. Supporting shipper: Tropicana Street, Gretna, La., 70053. Authority articles, and advertising literature and Products, Inc., General Offices, Braden­ sought to operate as a common carrier, dealer aids moving therewith (excluding ton, Fla. Send protests to: Joseph B. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, motion picture film used primarily for Teichert, District Supervisor, Bureau of transporting: Automobiles (passenger), commercial theater and television ex­ Operations and Compliance, Interstate from New Orleans, La., to points in the hibition), between the offices, labora­ Commerce Commission, Room 1621, 51 United States (Excluding Alaska and tories, and facilities of Howard’s Photo Southwest First Avenue, Miami, Fla., Hawaii), for 180 days. Supporting Laboratories, Inc., and Howard Co., Inc., 33130. shippers: United Detective Agency, Suite in or near Fort Wayne, Ind., Allen No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 500 TA), filed 371, Claiborne Towers, New Orleans, La., Comity, Ind., on the one hand, and on February 16, 1966. Applicant: QUAL­ 70112; M. G. Maher & Co., Inc., Sanlin the other, points in Indiana, Michigan, ITY CARRIERS, INC., 100 South Calu­ Building, 442 Canal Street, New Orleans, and Ohio, service to be limited to a met Street, Post Office Box 339, Burling­ La., 70130. Send protests to: William R. continuing contract or contracts with ton, Wis., 53105. Applicant’s represen­ Atkins, District Supervisor, Bureau of Howard’s Photo Laboratories, Inc., and tative: Fred H. Figge (same address as Operations and Compliance, Interstate Howard Co., Inc., for 180 days. Sup­ applicant). Authority sought to operate Commerce Commission, T-4009 Federal porting shippers: Howard Photo Labora­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Office Building, New Orleans, La., 70113. tories, Inc., Ferguson Road, Baer Field, over irregulär routes, transporting: No. MC 127941 TA, filed February 16, Fort Wayne, Ind.; Howard Co., Inc., 112 Textile softener, in bulk, in stainless steel 1966. Applicant: M. W. DALTON, West Wayne Street, Fort Wayne, Ind. insulated tank vehicles, from Clinton, ROBERT D. DALTON and MAURICE Representative: Charles W. Howard, Iowa, to Trion, Ga., for 180 days. Sup­ WAYNE DALTON, a partnership, doing president. Send protests to: Heber porting shipper: Clinton Com Process­ business as M. W. DALTON & SONS, Dixon, District Supervisor, Bureau of ing Co., Clinton, Iowa, 52733, H. P. Han­ 709 E. Street, Hamburg, Iowa, 51640. Operations and Compliance, Interstate sen, assistant traffic manager. Send Applicant’s representative: Martin & Commerce Commission, 308 Federal protests to: W. F. Sibbald, Jr., District WCnger, Hamburg, Iowa, 51640. Au­ Building, Fort Wayne, Ind., 46802. Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and thority sought to operate as a con­ Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com­ tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over By the Commission. mission, 108 West Wells Street, Room 511, irregular routes, transporting: (A) [ seal] H. N eil G arson, Milwaukee, Wis., 53203. Plastic pipe, plastic awnings and re­ Secretary, No. MC 126276 (Sub-No. 2 TA), filed lated plastic products manufactured February 16, 1966. Applicant: FAST in Hamburg, Iowa, from Hamburg, [F.R. Doc. 66-1995; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; MOTOR SERVICE, INC., 7521 West 62d Iowa, to points in Illinois, Missouri, 8:47 a.m.] Street, Summit, 111., 60608. Applicant’s Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, South representative: Robert H. Levy, 29 South Dakota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin, [Notice 1304] La Salle Street, Chicago, HI., 60603. Au­ (B) dry fertilizer and dry feed (in bulk MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER thority sought to operate as a contract and in bags), from St. Joseph, Mo., to carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular points within a 30-mile radius of Ham­ PROCEEDINGS routes, transporting r (1) Metal contain­ burg, Iowa, for 180 days. Supporting F ebruary 21, 1966. ers, (a) from, the plantsite of Crown shipper: For (A) Crown-Line Plastics, Synopses of orders entered pursuant Cork & Seal Co., Inc., at St. Louis, Mo., to ¡Inc., Hamburg, Iowa, for (B) Inter- to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ Chicago, 111., and Kenosha, Wis., (b) State Nurseries, Hamburg, Iowa; Reid merce Act, and rules and regulations from the plantsite of Crown Cork & Seal Grain Co., Hamburg, Iowa. Send pro­ prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part Co., Inc., at Chicago, 111., to St. Louis, tests to: Keith P. Kohrs, District Super­ 179), appear below: Mo., and Berkeley, Mo., and (2) mate­ visor, Bureau of Operations and Com­ As provided in the Commission’s spe­ rials used in the manufacturing or pliance, Interstate Commerce Commis­ cial rules of practice any interested per­ shipping of metal containers, from Chi­ sion, 705 Federal Offiee Building, Omaha, son may file a petition seeking recon­ cago, 111., to St. Louis and Berkeley, Mo., Nebr., 68102. sideration of the following numbered for 150 days. Supporting shipper: No. MC 127945 TA, filed February 16, proceedings within 20 days from the date Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 9300 Ashton 1966. Applicant: ROBERT JAMES of publication of this notice. Pursuant to Road, Post Office Box 6208, Philadelphia, MACHELL, doing business as MACHELL section 17 (8) of the Interstate Commerce Pa.j 19136. Send protests to: Charles J. TRUCKING, Hargitt Road, Matsqui, Act, the filing of such a petition will Kudelka, District Supervisor, Bureau of British Columbia, Canada. Authority postpone the effective date of the order Operations and Compliance, Interstate sought to operate as a contract carrier, in that proceeding pending its dis­ Commerce Commission, Room 1086, 219 by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, position. The matters relied upon by South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 111., transporting: Lumber, from points in petitioners must be specified in their 60604. Washington to ports of entry on the in­ petitions with particularity. No. MC 126480 (Sub-No. 3 TA), filed ternational boundary line between the No. MC-FC-68349. By order of Feb­ February 16, 1966. Applicant: ED­ United States and Canada in the State ruary 17, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ WARD D. DUNN, Route 5, Salem, Ohio, of Washington, for 180 days. Support­ proved the transfer to Robert Jeske, 44460. Applicant’s representative: Je­ Glenwood City, Wis., of a portion of the rome B. Greenbaum, 1836 Guardian ing shipper: Nicholson & Cates, Ltd., Post Office Box 160, North Vancouver, certificate in No. MC-35113, issued Oc­ Building, Detroit, Mich., 48226. Au­ tober 4, 1965, to Harris M. Samb, Spring thority sought to operate as a con­ British Columbia. Send protests to: Valley, Wis., authorizing the transporta­ tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over E. J. Casey, District Supervisor, Bureau tion of: Agricultural commodities and irregular routes, transporting: Vitreous of Operations and Compliance, Inter­ livestock, from points in the towns of enameling scrap iron, from Alliance, state Commerce Commission, 6130 Ar­ Glenwood and Springfield, St. Croix Salem, and Youngstown, Ohio, to De­ cade Building, Seattle, Wash., 98101. County, Wis., to South St. Paul, St. Paul,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 NOTICES 3167

Minn., Hastings, Chaska, and Red Wing, goods and emigrant movables, between and those in a described portion of Dela­ Minn.; and general commodities, exclud­ Avon, S. Dak., and points in South Da­ ware. Herman B. J. Weckstein, 1060 ing household goods, commodities in kota within 20 miles of Avon, on the one Broad Street, Newark, N.J., 07102, at­ bulk, and other specified commodities, hand, and, on the other, points in Ne­ torney for applicants. from South St. Paul, St. Paul, Minn., braska, Iowa, and North Dakota. Live­ No. MC-FC-68463. By order of Febru­ Hastings, Chaska, and Red Wing, Minn., stock and feed, between Avon, S. Dak., ary 17, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ to points in the towns of Glenwood and and Sioux City, Iowa, and points in Ne­ proved the transfer to Crossman’s Van Springfield, St. Croix County, Wis. A. R. braska and South Dakota. Don A. & Storage Co., Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., Fowler, 2288 University Avenue, St. Paul, Bierle, Law Building, Yankton, S. Dak., of the operating rights in certificate No. Minn., 55114, counsel for applicants. attorney for applicants. MC-19806, issued October 4, 1960, to No. MC-FC-68411. By order of Feb­ No. MC-FC-68434. By order of Feb­ Lester A. Crossman, doing business as ruary 17, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ ruary 17, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ Crossman’s Storage, Philadelphia, Pa., proved the transfer to Ricci Transporta­ proved the transfer - to Nello (Neil) authorizing the transportation, over ir­ tion Co., Inc., Pomona, N.J., of a portion Rocco, doing business as Rocco Truck­ regular routes, of: Household goods as of thfe certificate in No. MC-977, issued ing Co., Kearney, N.J., of the operating defined by the Commission, between April 15, 1963, to Henry R. Tomkinson rights in certificate No. MC-34805, is­ Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, and, Associates, Inc., doing business as Henry’s sued August 23, 1943, to Nello Rocco, on the other, points in Connecticut, Express, Egg Harbor City, N.J., author­ Harrison, N.J., authorizing the trans­ Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, izing the transportation of: Empty tin portation of : Steel building products, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Virginia, cans and equipment therefor, from Balti­ over irregular routes, from Harrison, West Virginia, and the District of Co­ more, Md., to Germania, and returned N.J., to points and places in the New lumbia. Between points in that part of or rejected shipments, from Germania, York, N.Y., commercial zone, as defined Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and N.J., to Baltimore, Md. Harry C. Max­ by the Commission in 1 M.C.C. 665, with Maryland within 60 miles of Philadel­ well, 200 Penn Square Building, Juniper no transportation for compensation on phia, Pa., including Philadelphia. Be­ and Filbert Streets, Philadelphia, Pa., return. Frank P. Gelenitis, 205 Kearney tween Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, 19107, counsel for applicants. Avenue, Kearney, N.J., 07032, attorney and, on the other, points in Maine, New No. MC-FC-68416. Republication.1 By for applicants. Hampshire, Illinois, Indiana, North order of January 25, 1966, the Transfer No. MC-FC-68456. By order of Feb­ Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Board approved the transfer to Orvan ruary 18, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ Florida. Maurice Abrams, 1405 Locust Tjeerdsma, Avon, S. Dak., of the op­ proved the transfer to Marsh Motor Street, Philadelphia, Pa., attorney for erating rights in certificate Nos. MC- Haulage, Inc., Elizabeth, N.J., of that applicants. 4233 issued July 25, 1944, and MC-4233 portion of the operating rights of Dis­ No. MC-FC-68464. By order of Feb­ (Sub-No. 1) issued February 4, 1960, to play Movers & Storage, Inc., North ruary 18, 1966, the Transfer Board ap­ James A. Janssen, Avon, S. Dak., author­ Brunswick, N.J., in certificate No. MC- proved the transfer to George Deliantis, izing the transportation, over regular and 48809, issued September 18, 1962, au­ doing business as Deliantis Trucking Co., irregular routes of: General commodi­ thorizing the transportation, over irregu­ 40-12 25th Avenue, Long Island City, ties, except those of unusual value, classes lar routes, of household goods, from New N.Y., of the operating rights in certifi­ A and B explosives, household goods as York, N.Y., and points in Connecticut, cate No. MC-80727, issued August 2, defined by the Commission, commodities New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania 1957, to Deliantis Trucking Co., Inc., 40- in bulk, commodities requiring special within 50 miles of New York, N.Y., to 12 25th Avenue, Long Island City, N.Y., equipment, and those injurious or con­ points in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, authorizing the transportation, over ir­ taminating to other lading, between Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachu­ regular routes, of: Household goods, be­ Avon, S. Dak., and Sioux City, Iowa, serv­ setts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New tween points in the New York, N.Y., ing intermediate and off-route points in Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, commercial zone as defined by the Com­ Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, mission, on the one hand, and, on the South Dakota within 20 miles of Avon. Virginia, and the District of Columbia, From Avon over South Dakota Highway other, points in Connecticut, Delaware, and from points in Connecticut, Dela­ District of Columbia, Maryland, Massa­ 50 to junction U.S. Highway 77, thence ware, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, chusetts, New Jersey, New York, Penn­ over U.S. Highway 77 to Sioux City, and Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hamp­ sylvania, and Rhode Island. return over the same route. Household shire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Is­ [seal] H. N eil G arson, Secretary. 1 Republished to include the operating land, Vermont, Virginia, and the District rights in certificate No. MC-4233 inadvert­ of Columbia, to Philadelphia, Pa., points [F.R. Doc. 66-1996; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; ently omitted from previous publication. in Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966 3168 FEDERAL REGISTER

CUMULATIVE LIST OF CFR PARTS AFFECTED— FEBRUARY

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during February.

3 CFR Page 7 CFR—Continued Pase 14 CFR—Continued page P roclamation: I486------9.QRA 3212 (terminated by Proc. 1488______97------2532, 2584, 2889 3703)------1295 157------1269 Proposed Rules: 221-----2------2424 3701 ------.------1231 26 _ 3702 ______1265 225------2927 319 295------2681 3703 ------1295 729______3704 ------2811 370------1298 813______P roposed R u l e s: E xecutive O rders : 905______I ------2485 3406 (revoked In part by PLO 906______3924)------2548 II ------2903 967______21------2485 10033 (amended by EO 11269) _ 2813 991______11269------2813 992______27------2485 11270- .------2989 29------2485 1003______33------2486 11271— ------29911012______11272------__ 3111 35------2487 1013______39------3078 P residential D ocuments O ther 1016______67—------1312 T han P roclamations and E xec­ 1033______utive O rders: 71------1312, 1034______2436, 2437, 2488-2490, 2552, 2553, Letter of Jan. 29,1966______2469 1063______Memorandum of February 16; 2660, 2661, 2732, 2903, 2904 1067______3078-3080. 1966------2993 1068______Statement of February 16, 1966_ 2995 73------2969, 3080 1097______75------2614 5 CFR 1102______213—------1233, 1106______15 CFR 1270, 1271, 2373, 2471, 2583, 2645 1108______8— ------2817 1138______2932,3069,3113. 16 CFR 338______8 CFR 713 15______103______303 ______6 CFR 212______P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 73______214______301 _ 245____ 7 CFR Proposed Rules : 17 CFR i 214______231______li______240______15______9 CFR 241______51______54 P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 55 78______240_ 56______94______249______70 304_____ 259______81 Proposed Rules: 274______312______319______18 CFR c 401 1 0 CFR 701 2 ______Proposed Rules: P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 709 Ch. I______2______717 _ 140___ ,____ 718______14______719 __ 1 2 CFR 154______722 400 ______19 CFR 724 543______8______1237, 1238, 1297, 2414, 2590, 2645 Proposed Rules: 10______728 581 ____ 13______' 730_ 582 ____ 775 16______811_ 1 3 CFR 24______25______------2546 850______2648 107___ _ ------2815 851_ _ 112______200______113______P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 905______13______906 1 4 CFR 907_ 21______20 CFR 908 _ 2 5 ______910 39______2422, 2649, 2650, 2681, 2887, 2927,’ P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 912 _ 405______913 __ 3015,3063,3064. 944 .... 21 CFR 970 _ 2002, 2422, 2423, 2473-2475, 2531,’ ______3003 971 __ 2650, 2651, 2717, 2888, 3064, 3065 2653, 3003, 3008 1269, 2002, 2583 10------3003 1068------_____ 2696 2475, 2777, 2888 27------2896 95______51------s u e FEDERAL REGISTER 3169

21 CFR—Continued Page 32A CFR Page 43 CFR—Continued Page 121_!______- 1271,BDSA (Ch. V I): P u b l i c L a n d O r d e r s —C ontinued 2425, 2476, 2547, 2833, 2896, 2897, BDSA Reg. 2, Amdt. 8______3009 3875 (amended by P L O 3936) _ 2692 2960,3116. M -11A ______2657, 3009 3921 ______- 2547 130______2653 3922 ______2547 33 CFR 3923_.______2547 146 _ 2653, 3003 82__ —______—___ - 2427 3924______2548 164______2653, 3003 207______2898 3925 ______'.______2548 166______1239 303______2898 191______3003, 3116, 3117 3926 ______2548 400______2778 3927 ______2549 P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 3928 ______2549 45___ 3028 1______2602 130______2967 3929 ______2549 66______2602 3930 ______2549 22 CFR 80____ — ____ — __ 2602, 3122 3931 ______2691 502______2426 82 ______2602 3932 ______2691 90______2602, 3122 3933 ______2692 24 CFR 95______2602, 3122 3934 ______2692 203______2477, 2887 100______2602 3935 ______2692 213______2477 144______2602 3936 ______2692 234______2478 36 CFR 3937 _;— ______2692 26 CFR 501______2597 45 CFR 1271, 2427 1______37 CFR 81______1302 31___ — ______2596 90______2900 251______2377 P roposed R u l e s : 201______— 2614 170______— ______2477 601______2818 801-______2657, 2693, 2902, 2928 P roposed R u l e s : 38 CFR P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 1______3016 3 2782 85______1312 28 CFR 14 _ 2782, 3059 21____ ■;______3010 46 CFR o______2427 2 2 1 ______— _____ 3015 200______3069 39 CFR 309______1240 29 CFR 17______3073 P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 800______2657 33 ______3119 10______— ______2602, 2972, 3122 1602-______2832 34 ______- ______3119 25______— 2602 P roposed R u l e s: 48 ______3074, 3119 30______2602 60______2436 51 3120 32 ______— _____ ,______2602 1508______3027 52 3119, 3120 33 ______2602 53 ___ 3120 35______— ______2602 30 CFR 58______3120 38______2602 42______2378 61______3120 40______2602 400______2897 112______2428 70______2602 P roposed R u l e s : 114______2428 72 ______2602 221_____ — 2614 132 ____ 3120 73 ______2602 133 ______3121 75 ______2602 31 CFR 168__ 2428 203______2596 76 ______2602 533___ 2429 77 ______2602 32 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 78 ______2602 46___ —______2384 90______2602 41______2887 61______2384 111______2681 92______2602 553______2834 41 CFR 94 ______2602 591 ______2367 5-3______2689 95 _____ ^______2602 592 ______2368 5-6______2689 96— ______2602 593 ______2368 5B -1______2597 97 ______2602 594 ______2369 5B -2_____ 2597 98 ______2602 595 ______- ___ 2369 5B -16______2600 110______;____ 2602 599 ______2370 11-1______2898 111______2602 600 ____ — ___ 2370 101-25______2471 113______2602 602______2370 101-47_____ 2658 146______2602 603______2371 157______2602 606______2371 43 CFR 160______2602 610______— 2371 19 ______3010 167______2602 1001______2681 20 ______2512 173______2602 1002______2684 3320______3013 176______2602 1003______2684 3630______3013 181______2602 1004______2685 P ublic Land Orders: 187______2602 1006______2685 509 (revoked by PLO 3932) ___ 2691 1007-1______2686 577 (revoked in part by PLO 47 CFR 1010______2687 3922)— — ______— 25470 ______3074 1013______2687 684 (revoked in part by PLO 1 ______2549, 2600, 3074 1015 ______2688 3922)___ 2547 19______2721 1016 ______2688 1394 (revoked in part by PLO 21______2600 1017 ______2688 3926)______2548 73__ — ______2932, 3075 1018 ______2688 3263 (revoked in part by PLO 91______2550 1030______2688 95— ______2551, 2600 1053______1303, 2688 3934)______2692 ,1054______2689 3447 (revoked in part by PLO P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 1057-______2689 3931)______2691 1______2904 1450______2928 3485 (see PLO 3931)_____ 2691 73______2438, 2554, 2555, 2970, 3080 1710______3121 3870______2380 74— ______2904 3170 FEDERAL REGISTER

49 CFR Page 0__ ------2718 77 ___ 2950 95_. 1303, 2692 136. ___ 2380 205. ___ 3077 P roposed R u l e s: 72 --- 3017 73 ------3017 74 - 3017 77------3017 95-97------3081 178------______2662, 2663 191------3081 50 CFR 28------2383, 2717 32------1303 33 ------2383, 2551, 2583, 3014, 3117, 3118 262_------2783 P roposed R u l e s: 32______2784