DOCSLIB.ORG

Tama County Multi-Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tama County Multi-Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan D EnS Tama County, Iowa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 - 2015 Executive Summary Submittal Date: September 3, 2010 Approval Date: TBD Update Deadline: TBD Plan Prepared By: Region 6 Planning Commission 903 E Main Street Marshalltown, IA 50158 Plan Authors: This is a multi-jurisdictional multi-hazard plan written in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Alicia Rosman, Planner Title 44, Part 201 pending FEMA approval. Alyson Lutz, Planner Table of Contents Special Thanks…………………………………………………………………………………4 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………….5 Prerequisites……...…………………………………….………………………………………………………..7 Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………………..11 Chapter 2: Hazard Mitigation Planning Process…………………………………………15 Chapter 3: Planning Area 3.1 - Planning Area Profile………………………………………………………………………..29 3.2 - Jurisdiction Descriptions and Capabilities……………………………………………….58 Chapter 4: Risk Assessment……………………………………………………………………………111 4.1 - Hazard Identification………………………………………………………………………….112 4.2 - Hazard Profiles…………………………………………………………………125 4.3 - Hazard Ranking………………………………………………………………166 4.4 - Vulnerability Assessment………………………………………………….172 4.4.1 - Vulnerability……………………………………………………………….173 4.4.2 - Community Assets…………………………………………………198 4.4.3 - Repetitive Loss Properties……………………………………………………………….231 Chapter 5: Mitigation Strategy………………………………………………………………………………..232 5.1 - Goals, Mitigation Actions, and Evaluation……………………………………………………232 Chapter 6: Plan Maintenance Process…………………………………………………………….295 6.1 - Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan……………………………………………..295 6.2 - Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms……………………………..297 6.3 - Continued Public Involvement…………………………………………………………………………….297 Chapter 7: Recommendations………………………………………………………………………..298 *Continue to next page for Appendices 2 Appendices A: Resolutions for Adoption B: Community Inventories C: Kick-off Meeting Materials D: Countywide Meeting #1 Materials F: Countywide Meeting #2 Materials G: STAPLEE Evaluations H: Chelsea Exception/Plan Approval Letter I: CodeRED Article J: Public Comment Documentation 3 Special Thanks The Region 6 Planning is extremely thankful to all of the people who helped in the development of this plan. We would like to specially thank Tama County Emergency Management and all other Tama County staff who assisted with plan development. We also would like to specially thank Tama County Economic Development for helping to assemble the Task Force, provide meeting space, and give support in organizing meetings. Finally, we thank the Task Force and city staff for participating in the plan development and providing the information that was essential for development and overall success of this plan. 4 Executive Summary This multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation grant is being submitted to FEMA by the Region 6 Planning Commission in Marshalltown, Iowa on behalf of one of its four jurisdictional counties, Tama County. This plan defines hazards - “any source of danger that threatens humans, property, and the environment” (FEMA 385-2/August 2001, Page iii) - and hazard mitigation planning - a proactive approach to prepare individual Tama County jurisdictions for hazards that could affect them. The entire mitigation process is outlined including the steps of organizing community resources, risk assessment and mitigation strategy, writing the plan, community comment period, submitting the plan, plan approval and adoption, and finally plan implementation by jurisdictions and counties. One of the most important steps is the risk assessment and mitigation strategy in which countywide meetings attended by each participating jurisdiction were held. Asset mapping, identifying critical facilities and vulnerable populations, as well as establishing goals and prioritizing mitigation actions are all exercises the participants completed to help Region 6 have a better idea as to the need of each jurisdiction. Background work and research was completed to produce a profile of the entire planning area, Tama County. Information including location, demographics, housing, transportation, and economic conditions gives a statistically detailed depiction of the planning area. Similar data is presented for the individual jurisdictions of Tama County, along with even more detailed information of the area including local government, services provided, resources employed, and previous mitigation efforts taken at the city level. Four school districts are also included in the planning area; profiles include enrollment and school building locations. In the Risk Assessment chapter, every hazard that could possibly affect Tama County is identified and profiled with the information of its description, historical occurrence, probability, vulnerability of the county, the maximum extent of its possible destruction, severity and speed of onset included. Based on the frequency and/or impact of each of these descriptors, the hazards are ranked with the highest, tornado, being the biggest threat to Tama County. The individual jurisdiction’s assets and vulnerable populations (identified at the countywide meetings) are displayed in the plan in order to gauge what/who needs priority when a hazard strikes. City facilities and grocery stores, and elderly and disabled populations are the most frequently identified as critical facilities and vulnerable populations. With these elements, along with the severity of the different hazards gauged, the vulnerability across all individual jurisdictions is calculated; the highest rated hazard still being, the tornado. Though all jurisdictions of Tama County are affected by several hazards, the City of Chelsea is of particular concern and priority in the plan. The Repetitive Loss Properties subsection of the plan identifies Chelsea as a jurisdiction with flood-insured properties that have been damaged by flooding repeatedly. 5 The mitigation strategy, produced by each jurisdiction takes into account their risk assessment and vulnerability to hazards to create goals with subsequent projects to help reach those goals. Some of the most popular goals include minimizing losses to structures, protecting the health and safety of residents, educating citizens of the dangers of hazards and continuity of operations of the jurisdictions and county. Projects identified to help achieve those goals include the installation of safe rooms, purchase of generators, elevation of roads, and the creation of emergency contact sheets and procedures. Projects are evaluated and ranked to set their priority to each community using the STAPLEE evaluation method. It is of the utmost importance that the maintenance and update of this plan continues in order to carry on proactive efforts in all jurisdictions of the planning area when it comes to hazards. Incorporating the plan and its ideals into everyday legislation, decisions and planning will ensure that hazards are considered in the future development and operations of cities. The opportunities of annual meetings to monitor and evaluate the plan, as well as publicizing success stories of projects will keep the public involved and informed of what hazard mitigation can and is doing for their city. Recommendations made by the plan authors give final input and advice on the smooth running and implementation of the goals set forth by each jurisdiction. 6 Prerequisites 44 CFR Requirement §201.6(c)(5): [The local hazard mitigation plan shall include] documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan (e.g., City Council, County Commission, Tribal Council). For multi-jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted. Note to reviewers: When this plan has been reviewed and approved pending adoption by FEMA Region VII, the adoption resolutions will be signed by the participating jurisdictions and added to Appendix A. The following 17 jurisdictions participated in the creation of this plan and have adopted the multi- jurisdictional plan. Refer to Figure 1 for a map of the jurisdictions included in this plan. o City of Chelsea o City of Traer o City of Clutier o City of Vining o City of Dysart o Tama County (Unincorporated) o City of Elberon o Union Community School District o City of Garwin o North Tama County Community School District o City of Gladbrook o South Tama County Community School District o City of Lincoln o Gladbrook-Reinbeck School District o City of Montour o City of Tama o City of Toledo It should be noted that the Meskwaki Settlement is located in Tama County along U.S. Highway 30 between Marshalltown and Tama. The settlement is completely independent from the county so it was not included in this hazard mitigation plan. Also, the Green Mountain-Garwin Community School District and the Benton Community School District were invited to participate in this plan process but did not respond to the invitation. Excepting the Meskwaki Settlement, the planning boundary for this multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan includes all of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Tama County, Iowa. Also, all of the school districts and associated buildings that are located in Tama County are included in the planning boundary. Refer to Figure 1 on the next page. 7 Figure 1: Tama County Participating Jurisdictions Note: Some school districts that are included in this hazard mitigation plan cross county boundaries with some buildings located in an adjacent county. For
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 81/Tuesday, April 28, 1998/Notices
    23300 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 1998 / Notices to gather this information, since it the fundraising policies included in Tazewell County includes asking visitors to evaluate National Park Service Management Cemetery Road Bridge, Candlewood Dr. services and facilities that they used Policies (1988) are being revised and within Glendale Cemetery, Washington, during their park visit. Special Directive 95±12, Special 98000467 Description of Respondents: A sample Directive 89±2, Staff Directive 84±1, and IOWA of visitors to Mount Rushmore National the October 15, 1986, Policy on Memorial. Fundraising and Philanthropy will be Hamilton County Esimated Average Number of rescinded. The new policies for Tremaine Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa Respondents: 400. donations and fundraising will be MPS), 280th St. over Boone R., Webster Estimated Average Number of issued as Director's Order #21, in City vicinity, 98000519 Responses: Each respondent will conformance with the new system of Hardin County respond only one time, so the number NPS internal guidance documents. of responses will be the same as the Alden Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa MPS) Dated: April 17, 1998. number of respondents. Main St. over Iowa R., Alden, 98000517 Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Katherine H. Stevenson, Coal Bank Hill Bridge (Highway Bridges of Response: 20 minutes. Associate Director, Cultural Resource Iowa MPS), Near Co. Rd. VV over Iowa R., Frequency of Response: One time per Stewardship and Partnerships. Eldora City vicinity, 98000527 respondent. [FR Doc. 98±11187 Filed 4±27±98; 8:45 am] Iowa Falls Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa MPS), US 65 over Iowa R., Iowa Falls, Estimated Annual Reporting Burden: BILLING CODE 4310±70±P 98000516 120 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Victim Assistance Resource Directory
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE RESOURCE DIRECTORY CRIME VICTIM COMPENSATION PROGRAM OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BONNIE J. CAMPBELL 149715 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the LO person or organization originating it. Points of View or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Iowa Dept. of Justice/Crime Victim Assistance Division to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. il 11 .1994 -1995 I I I The Crime Victim Compensation Program of the Attorney General's Office is pleased to provide you with a revised statewide directory of services available for crime victims. The directory is not a complete listing of statewide services available to victims of crime. It contains only entries for those agencies or providers who responded to a survey distributed by the Crime Victim I Compensation Program. When referring victims to appropriate services it may be helpful to check the resources in contiguous I counties. Agencies which have multi-county sen'ices are listed under each county. Inclusion or omission of a particular program or provider in the directory does Dot imply an endorsement I' by the Crime Victim Compensation Program. Enclosed in the directory is a blank copy of the survey form for your use.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS -orm 10-900-b __^- "^ \ 0MB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This <orm is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 168). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete alt items. X New Submission Amended Suomission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing HISTORIC RESOURCES OF EAST TOLEDO B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) ETHNIC SETTLEMENT OF TOLEDO (1830-1930) WORKING CLASS SETTLEMENT OF EAST TOLEDO (1852-1930) C. Form Prepared by name/title TED LIGIBEL, ANDREW SAGER & EVELYN BRAY organization UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO. URBAN AFFAIRS DEPT. date MARCH 13. 1994 street & number 2801 W. BANCROFT telephone (419) 537-3591 city or town TOLEDO state OHIO zip code 43606______ D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) / I IJant- H+r.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1998
    National Register of Historic Places 1998 Weekly Lists WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/22/97 THROUGH 12/26/97 .................................... 3 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/29/97 THROUGH 1/02/98 ...................................... 6 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/05/98 THROUGH 1/09/98 ........................................ 8 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/12/98 THROUGH 1/16/98 ...................................... 12 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/19/98 THROUGH 1/23/98 ...................................... 15 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/26/98 THROUGH 1/30/98 ...................................... 18 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/02/98 THROUGH 2/06/98 ...................................... 20 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/09/98 THROUGH 2/13/98 ...................................... 22 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/16/98 THROUGH 2/20/98 ...................................... 25 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/23/98 THROUGH 2/27/98 ...................................... 28 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/02/98 THROUGH 3/06/98 ...................................... 30 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/09/98 THROUGH 3/13/98 ...................................... 34 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/16/98 THROUGH 3/20/98 ...................................... 36 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/23/98 THROUGH 3/27/98 ...................................... 39 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/30/98 THROUGH 4/03/98 ...................................... 41 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 4/06/98 THROUGH 4/10/98 ...................................... 45 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 4/13/98 THROUGH 4/17/98 .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • FILED with Executive Secretary IOW a UTILITIES BOAR D April 09, 2010
    FILED WITH Executive Secretary April 09, 2010 IOWA UTILITIES BOARD NOI-2010-0001 BTOP Sustainable Broadband Adoption Community Anchor Institution Detail Template Please complete the Anchor Institution Details worksheet by providing information on Community Anchor Institutions that will be directly involved in or benefit from the pro project. Add rows as necessary. All community anchor institutions should be given a specified list. A Community Anchor Institution is considered a minority-serving institu post-secondary educational institution with enrollment of minority students exceedin total enrollment. The "Role" column only requires a word or two, or a short phrase, n explanation. A detailed explanation of the role of project partners and community an institutions should be provided in the essay portions of the application. The data provided via this template will be subject to automated processing. Applic therefore required to provide this upload as an Excel file, and not to convert it to a P upload. Additionally, applicants should not modify the format of this file. n all oposed type from the ution if it is a ng 50% of its not a detailed nchor cants are PDF prior to BTOP SBA Community Anchor Institutions Detail Template Title: County Executives Telecommunications Network (CETN), formerly County Executives Easy Grants ID: 7027 Minority Serving Institution Facility Name Organization Address Line 1 City State Zip Facility Type Project Role Type Other Government Implementation Point of Contact Autauga County Courthouse Autauga 134 N Court
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC County Courthouses in Iowa AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER maltiple; see inventory sheets _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT VICINITY OF STATE Iowa CODE COUNTY CODE CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X.PUBLIC —^OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE ^.MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) X.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ^-EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —KvES: RESTRICTED ^.GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC Xthematic —BEING CONSIDERED _XYES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION group NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple; see inventory sheets STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE,REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. to be found, in. courthouses, in the. respective counties STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS County Courthouses in Iowa DATE 1977-1980 -FEDERAL XSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Division of Historic Preservation, Iowa City, Iowa CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE V X —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE —RUINS .^ALTERED —MOVED DATE- V —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This thematic group nomination is for 52 county courthouses in Iowa, built between c. 1850 and 1930. Twenty-one Iowa courthouses are already listed in the National Register, either individually or as part of historic districts. There remain 29 additional courthouses, a number of which may eventually be determined eligible, which are at this time less than 50 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLIGHTS of THIS ISSUE BANKING— This Listing Does Not Affect the Legal Status of Any Document Published in This Issue
    WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 1975 WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 40 ■ Number 113 Pages 24887-24992 PRIVACY ACT OF 1974— FURTHER NOTICE TO AGENCIES The Office of the Federal Register encourages agencies to submit as much Privacy Act material as possible on magnetic tape or OCR scannable copy. This is intended to minimize the cost of publishing the large amount of material expected. Assistance and specifications are avail­ able from the Federal Register Privacy Coordinator. Call 523-5240 for further information. June 11, 1975— Pages 24887-24992 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE This listing does not affect the legal status of any document published in this issue. Detailed table of contents appears inside. MILITARY ASSISTANCE FOR AFRICAN COUNTRIES— Presidential Determination......................... —:................... - 24887 MILITARY ASSISTANCE FOR KENYA— Presidential Deter­ mination .............. .......................................... ........................... 24889 SALE OF SIDEWINDER MISSILES TO BRAZIL— Presiden­ tial Determination................................................... -........-..... 24891 X-RAY EQUIPMENT— HEW/FDA proposes to amend per­ formance standards for diagnostic systems; comments by 8 -1 1 -7 5 ........................-............ J............................ 24909 VETERANS BENEFITS— VA proposes to change evidence submission procedures; comments by 7-11-75 ...... 24920 MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION— Commerce/NOAA pro­ cedures for application processing and suspensions; effective 6 -6 —75.................. ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Introduction and Profile
    BENTON COUNTY 2021 MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN SECTION 1 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROFILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Generally, the first question asked when communities begin the process of preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is very simply, “What is a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and what is its intended purpose?” First, it is imperative to define precisely what the term mitigation entails. On definition of the term is stated most effectively by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and is as follows: “Mitigation is defined as any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from a hazard event. Mitigation, also known as prevention (when done before a disaster), encourages long-term reduction of hazard vulnerability. The goal of mitigation is to decrease the need for response as opposed to simply increasing the response capability.” (www.fema.gov). The Benton County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan was prepared for the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Benton County in response to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). DMA 2000 requires states and local governments to prepare hazard mitigation plans in order to remain eligible to receive federal funds made available in the wake of a Presidential Disaster declaration. It is important to remember that mitigation funds are distinct from response and recovery funds available from state and federal sources intended for immediate disaster relief. To produce a DMA 2000 compliant plan, municipalities must document their hazard mitigation planning process and identify hazards, potential losses, and mitigation needs, goals and strategies. With that definition in mind, a mitigation plan is a document that is intended to accomplish several things.
    [Show full text]
  • Campground & Resort, Lie on the South
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Iowa United States Highway #30 Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Nebraska/Iowa Border The Blair Bridge or Abraham Lincoln Memorial Bridge carries U.S. Route #30 across Missouri River from Nebraska into Iowa. This is where United States Highway #30 starts its run through Iowa to end at the Iowa/Illinois border where the highway crosses into Illinois over Gateway Bridge across Mississippi River in Clinton, Iowa. Altitude: 994 feet 3.2 Austin Avenue: Austin Avenue, Modale, Iowa, a city in Harrison County, Iowa, Missouri Dale Wildlife Area, 260th Street to, Horseshoe Lake, Tyson Island State Wildlife Management Area, Altitude: 1007 feet 5.3 Fremont Avenue Fremont Avenue, Community of California Junction, Iowa, Altitude: 1010 feet 6.3 Grover Avenue: Wildlife Grover Avenue, Nobles Lake, Nobles Lake State Wildlife Management Mgmt Area Area, Wilson Island State Park, Wilson Island State Recreation Area, Altitude: 1010 feet 9.2 Intersection Intersection Interstate Highway #29, Fish Lake Wildlife Area, St. Johns Wildlife Area, located north along Interstate Highway #29, Community of Clara, Iowa, City of Council Bluffs, Iowa, located south on/along Interstate Highway #29, Altitude: 1001 feet 10.6 Missouri Valley, IA N 1st Street, Loess Hills Trail, Missouri Valley, Iowa, a city in Harrison County, Iowa, Alegent Health Community Memorial Hospital, Community of Finley, Iowa, located on S 16th Street/Lima Trail to the south. Altitude: 1004 feet 13.5 County Road F58/296th County Road F58/296th Street, Persia, Iowa, a city in Harrison County, Street Iowa, located at the Junction with Iowa Highway #191.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLIGHTS of THIS ISSUE This Listing Does Not Affect the Legal Status of Any Document Published in This Issue
    WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1971 WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 36 ■ Number 212 Pages 21017-21112 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE This listing does not affect the legal status of any document published in this issue. Detailed table of contents appears inside. STABILIZATION OF THE ECONOMY— Presidential Executive order providing for designation of alternates on Pay Board and Price Commission. .. 21023 SHORT TERM SAVINGS ACCOUNTS— FHLBB regulation on distribution of earnings; effective 11-3-71 ........ 21025 TONNAGE TAX— Customs Bur. regulation re certain applications for refund_______________ 21025 NEW DRUGS— FDA exemption of specific radio­ active drugs from certain regulations_______ ______ 21026 RELEASE OF INFORMATION— Justice Dept, re­ vised guidelines relating to civil and criminal proceedings ............. .................. ................... 21028 OIL AND GAS LEASES— Interior Dept, regulation on reinstatement of terminated leases; effective 11-3-71 .............. 21035 FISHERIES— Commerce Dept, ^-regulation on inspection and certification......... ................ 21037 VIRUSES, SERUMS AND TOXINS— Agr. Dept, proposal to revise certain standard requirements; comments within 60 days........... ............... ....... 21058 FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN— FHLBB pro­ posals relating to applications for mergers, con­ solidations, and purchases of bulk assets (2 documents); comments by 12-3-71.........21066, 21067 (Continued inside) I Latest Edition Guide to Record Retention Requirements [Revised as of January 1, 1971] This useful reference tool is designed
    [Show full text]
  • Tama County Hazard Mitigation Planning Process
    EnS Tama County, Iowa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 - 2020 Executive Summary Submittal Date: October 20, 2015 Approval Date: October 26, 2015 Update Deadline: TBD Plan Prepared By: Region 6 Planning Commission 903 E Main Street Marshalltown, IA 50158 Table of Contents This is a multi-jurisdictional multi-hazard plan written in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Plan Author: Title 44, Part 201 pending FEMA approval. Julie Whitson, Planner Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 2: Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ....................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3: Planning Area ................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1: Planning Area Profile .............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.2: Jurisdiction Descriptions and Capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • Region 6 Long Range Transportation Plan
    REGION 6 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINAL Prepared by: Region 6 Resource Partners 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, Iowa 51058 www.region6resources.org Current Update: January 2021 Last Updated: February 2014 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Regional Planning Process and Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 5 REGION 6 SERVICES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE (POLICY) BOARD OF DIRECTORS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 REGION 6 EXECUTIVE (POLICY) BOARD .................................................................................................................................................. 6 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 REGION 6 STAFF ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 OTHER REPRESENTATION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 REGION
    [Show full text]