Tama County Hazard Mitigation Planning Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tama County Hazard Mitigation Planning Process EnS Tama County, Iowa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 - 2020 Executive Summary Submittal Date: October 20, 2015 Approval Date: October 26, 2015 Update Deadline: TBD Plan Prepared By: Region 6 Planning Commission 903 E Main Street Marshalltown, IA 50158 Table of Contents This is a multi-jurisdictional multi-hazard plan written in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Plan Author: Title 44, Part 201 pending FEMA approval. Julie Whitson, Planner Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 2: Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ....................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3: Planning Area ................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1: Planning Area Profile .............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.2: Jurisdiction Descriptions and Capabilities .................................................................................................... 56 Chapter 4: Risk Assessment .............................................................................................................................................. 99 4.1: Hazard Identification .............................................................................................................................................. 99 4.2: Hazard Profiles and Risk Assessment .......................................................................................................... 122 4.3: Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 179 4.3.1: Vulnerability ................................................................................................................................................... 180 4.3.2: Community Assets ........................................................................................................................................ 231 4.3.3: Repetitive Loss Properties ........................................................................................................................ 274 Chapter 5: Mitigation Strategy ...................................................................................................................................... 276 5.1: Goals, Mitigation Actions, and Evaluation .................................................................................................. 276 Chapter 6: Plan Maintenance Process ........................................................................................................................ 343 6.1: Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan ........................................................................................ 343 6.2: Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms ................................................................................. 345 6.3: Continued Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................ 345 Chapter 7: Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................... 346 Appendix A: Tama County Meeting Minutes .......................................................................................................... 347 Appendix B: Action Updates........................................................................................................................................... 350 Appendix C: Examples of Public Notification .......................................................................................................... 360 Appendix D. Flash Flood Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 361 Appendix E. Tama County Floodplain Maps ............................................................................................................ 367 Appendix F. City of Chelsea, Iowa and Tama County Historic River Flooding News Articles ............ 376 Appendix G. Tama County Historic Weather and Hazardous Materials Data ......................................... 381 Appendix G. List of Levees Within 75 Miles of Tama County ........................................................................... 399 Appendix I. Fixed Hazardous Materials Hazard Areas ....................................................................................... 401 Appendix J. Pipeline Hazard Areas ............................................................................................................................. 414 Appendix K. Rail Transportation Hazard Areas .................................................................................................... 422 Appendix L. Special Flood Hazard Areas ................................................................................................................. 426 Appendix M. Dam Hazard Areas in Tama County ................................................................................................ 439 Appendix O. Grass and Wildland Fire Hazard Areas ........................................................................................... 441 Appendix P. Results of Mitigation Action Prioritization .................................................................................... 454 Appendix Q. Resolutions ................................................................................................................................................. 465 Appendix R: Data Sources Used in Plan .................................................................................................................... 466 2 Executive Summary This multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan is being submitted to FEMA by the Region 6 Planning Commission in Marshalltown, Iowa on behalf of one of its four jurisdictional counties, Tama County. This plan defines hazards - “any source of danger that threatens humans, property, and the environment” (FEMA 385-2/August 2001, Page iii) - and hazard mitigation planning - a proactive approach to prepare individual Tama County jurisdictions for hazards that could affect them. The entire mitigation process is outlined including the steps of organizing community resources, risk assessment and mitigation strategy, writing the plan, community comment period, submitting the plan, plan approval and adoption, and finally plan implementation by jurisdictions and counties. Background work and research was completed to produce a profile of the entire planning area – Tama County. Information including location, demographics, housing, transportation, and economic conditions gives a statistically detailed depiction of the planning area. Similar data is presented for the individual jurisdictions of Tama County, along with even more detailed information of the area including local government, services provided, resources employed, and previous mitigation efforts taken at the city level. Profiles for the four school districts are also included in the planning area. In the Risk Assessment chapter, every hazard that could possibly affect Tama County is identified and profiled with the information of its description, historical occurrence, probability, vulnerability, severity of impact, and speed of onset included. Based on the frequency and/or impact of each of these descriptors, the hazards are scored according to which hazards pose the largest threat to Tama County. A mitigation strategy is produced by each jurisdiction and takes into account their risk assessment and vulnerability to hazards to create goals with subsequent projects to help reach those goals. Some of the most popular goals include minimizing losses to structures, protecting the health and safety of residents, educating citizens of the dangers of hazards and continuing the operations of the jurisdictions and county without disruption during a hazard. Projects identified to help achieve those goals include the installation of safe rooms, purchase of generators for critical facilities, elevation of roads, and the creation of emergency contact sheets and procedures. Projects are evaluated and ranked to set their priority to each community using several evaluation criteria. This plan identifies individual jurisdiction’s assets and vulnerable populations in order to gauge what/who needs priority when a hazard strikes. City facilities and grocery stores, and elderly and disabled populations are the most frequently identified as critical facilities and vulnerable populations. All of these exercises helped Region 6 have a better idea as to the need of each jurisdiction. 3 Much progress has been made for the communities of Tama County during the previous planning process as they removed structures from the floodplain, installed
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 81/Tuesday, April 28, 1998/Notices
    23300 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 1998 / Notices to gather this information, since it the fundraising policies included in Tazewell County includes asking visitors to evaluate National Park Service Management Cemetery Road Bridge, Candlewood Dr. services and facilities that they used Policies (1988) are being revised and within Glendale Cemetery, Washington, during their park visit. Special Directive 95±12, Special 98000467 Description of Respondents: A sample Directive 89±2, Staff Directive 84±1, and IOWA of visitors to Mount Rushmore National the October 15, 1986, Policy on Memorial. Fundraising and Philanthropy will be Hamilton County Esimated Average Number of rescinded. The new policies for Tremaine Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa Respondents: 400. donations and fundraising will be MPS), 280th St. over Boone R., Webster Estimated Average Number of issued as Director's Order #21, in City vicinity, 98000519 Responses: Each respondent will conformance with the new system of Hardin County respond only one time, so the number NPS internal guidance documents. of responses will be the same as the Alden Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa MPS) Dated: April 17, 1998. number of respondents. Main St. over Iowa R., Alden, 98000517 Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Katherine H. Stevenson, Coal Bank Hill Bridge (Highway Bridges of Response: 20 minutes. Associate Director, Cultural Resource Iowa MPS), Near Co. Rd. VV over Iowa R., Frequency of Response: One time per Stewardship and Partnerships. Eldora City vicinity, 98000527 respondent. [FR Doc. 98±11187 Filed 4±27±98; 8:45 am] Iowa Falls Bridge (Highway Bridges of Iowa MPS), US 65 over Iowa R., Iowa Falls, Estimated Annual Reporting Burden: BILLING CODE 4310±70±P 98000516 120 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Victim Assistance Resource Directory
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE RESOURCE DIRECTORY CRIME VICTIM COMPENSATION PROGRAM OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BONNIE J. CAMPBELL 149715 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the LO person or organization originating it. Points of View or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Iowa Dept. of Justice/Crime Victim Assistance Division to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. il 11 .1994 -1995 I I I The Crime Victim Compensation Program of the Attorney General's Office is pleased to provide you with a revised statewide directory of services available for crime victims. The directory is not a complete listing of statewide services available to victims of crime. It contains only entries for those agencies or providers who responded to a survey distributed by the Crime Victim I Compensation Program. When referring victims to appropriate services it may be helpful to check the resources in contiguous I counties. Agencies which have multi-county sen'ices are listed under each county. Inclusion or omission of a particular program or provider in the directory does Dot imply an endorsement I' by the Crime Victim Compensation Program. Enclosed in the directory is a blank copy of the survey form for your use.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS -orm 10-900-b __^- "^ \ 0MB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This <orm is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 168). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete alt items. X New Submission Amended Suomission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing HISTORIC RESOURCES OF EAST TOLEDO B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) ETHNIC SETTLEMENT OF TOLEDO (1830-1930) WORKING CLASS SETTLEMENT OF EAST TOLEDO (1852-1930) C. Form Prepared by name/title TED LIGIBEL, ANDREW SAGER & EVELYN BRAY organization UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO. URBAN AFFAIRS DEPT. date MARCH 13. 1994 street & number 2801 W. BANCROFT telephone (419) 537-3591 city or town TOLEDO state OHIO zip code 43606______ D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) / I IJant- H+r.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1998
    National Register of Historic Places 1998 Weekly Lists WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/22/97 THROUGH 12/26/97 .................................... 3 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/29/97 THROUGH 1/02/98 ...................................... 6 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/05/98 THROUGH 1/09/98 ........................................ 8 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/12/98 THROUGH 1/16/98 ...................................... 12 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/19/98 THROUGH 1/23/98 ...................................... 15 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 1/26/98 THROUGH 1/30/98 ...................................... 18 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/02/98 THROUGH 2/06/98 ...................................... 20 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/09/98 THROUGH 2/13/98 ...................................... 22 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/16/98 THROUGH 2/20/98 ...................................... 25 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 2/23/98 THROUGH 2/27/98 ...................................... 28 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/02/98 THROUGH 3/06/98 ...................................... 30 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/09/98 THROUGH 3/13/98 ...................................... 34 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/16/98 THROUGH 3/20/98 ...................................... 36 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/23/98 THROUGH 3/27/98 ...................................... 39 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 3/30/98 THROUGH 4/03/98 ...................................... 41 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 4/06/98 THROUGH 4/10/98 ...................................... 45 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 4/13/98 THROUGH 4/17/98 .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • FILED with Executive Secretary IOW a UTILITIES BOAR D April 09, 2010
    FILED WITH Executive Secretary April 09, 2010 IOWA UTILITIES BOARD NOI-2010-0001 BTOP Sustainable Broadband Adoption Community Anchor Institution Detail Template Please complete the Anchor Institution Details worksheet by providing information on Community Anchor Institutions that will be directly involved in or benefit from the pro project. Add rows as necessary. All community anchor institutions should be given a specified list. A Community Anchor Institution is considered a minority-serving institu post-secondary educational institution with enrollment of minority students exceedin total enrollment. The "Role" column only requires a word or two, or a short phrase, n explanation. A detailed explanation of the role of project partners and community an institutions should be provided in the essay portions of the application. The data provided via this template will be subject to automated processing. Applic therefore required to provide this upload as an Excel file, and not to convert it to a P upload. Additionally, applicants should not modify the format of this file. n all oposed type from the ution if it is a ng 50% of its not a detailed nchor cants are PDF prior to BTOP SBA Community Anchor Institutions Detail Template Title: County Executives Telecommunications Network (CETN), formerly County Executives Easy Grants ID: 7027 Minority Serving Institution Facility Name Organization Address Line 1 City State Zip Facility Type Project Role Type Other Government Implementation Point of Contact Autauga County Courthouse Autauga 134 N Court
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC County Courthouses in Iowa AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER maltiple; see inventory sheets _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT VICINITY OF STATE Iowa CODE COUNTY CODE CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X.PUBLIC —^OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE ^.MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) X.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ^-EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —KvES: RESTRICTED ^.GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC Xthematic —BEING CONSIDERED _XYES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION group NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple; see inventory sheets STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE,REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. to be found, in. courthouses, in the. respective counties STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS County Courthouses in Iowa DATE 1977-1980 -FEDERAL XSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Division of Historic Preservation, Iowa City, Iowa CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE V X —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE —RUINS .^ALTERED —MOVED DATE- V —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This thematic group nomination is for 52 county courthouses in Iowa, built between c. 1850 and 1930. Twenty-one Iowa courthouses are already listed in the National Register, either individually or as part of historic districts. There remain 29 additional courthouses, a number of which may eventually be determined eligible, which are at this time less than 50 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Tama County Multi-Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
    D EnS Tama County, Iowa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 - 2015 Executive Summary Submittal Date: September 3, 2010 Approval Date: TBD Update Deadline: TBD Plan Prepared By: Region 6 Planning Commission 903 E Main Street Marshalltown, IA 50158 Plan Authors: This is a multi-jurisdictional multi-hazard plan written in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Alicia Rosman, Planner Title 44, Part 201 pending FEMA approval. Alyson Lutz, Planner Table of Contents Special Thanks…………………………………………………………………………………4 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………….5 Prerequisites……...…………………………………….………………………………………………………..7 Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………………..11 Chapter 2: Hazard Mitigation Planning Process…………………………………………15 Chapter 3: Planning Area 3.1 - Planning Area Profile………………………………………………………………………..29 3.2 - Jurisdiction Descriptions and Capabilities……………………………………………….58 Chapter 4: Risk Assessment……………………………………………………………………………111 4.1 - Hazard Identification………………………………………………………………………….112 4.2 - Hazard Profiles…………………………………………………………………125 4.3 - Hazard Ranking………………………………………………………………166 4.4 - Vulnerability Assessment………………………………………………….172 4.4.1 - Vulnerability……………………………………………………………….173 4.4.2 - Community Assets…………………………………………………198 4.4.3 - Repetitive Loss Properties……………………………………………………………….231 Chapter 5: Mitigation Strategy………………………………………………………………………………..232 5.1 - Goals, Mitigation Actions, and Evaluation……………………………………………………232 Chapter 6: Plan Maintenance Process…………………………………………………………….295 6.1 - Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating
    [Show full text]
  • Region 6 Long Range Transportation Plan
    REGION 6 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINAL Prepared by: Region 6 Resource Partners 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, Iowa 51058 www.region6resources.org Current Update: January 2021 Last Updated: February 2014 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Regional Planning Process and Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 5 REGION 6 SERVICES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE (POLICY) BOARD OF DIRECTORS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 REGION 6 EXECUTIVE (POLICY) BOARD .................................................................................................................................................. 6 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 REGION 6 STAFF ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 OTHER REPRESENTATION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 REGION
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Generation Feasibility Study for Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi In
    Wind Generation Feasibility Study For Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa Meskwaki Nation by Wind Utility Consulting, PC March 19, 2013 March 19, 2013 Mr. Larry C. Lasley, Economic Development Director Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa 349 Meskwaki Road Tama, Iowa 52339 Dear Larry: Subject: Draft Wind Generation Feasibility Report for Review Please find attached a review draft of the wind generation feasibility study for the Meskwaki casino and hotel complex. Please let me know if you need any additional information or clarifications in the report. After I incorporate any additional information I will issue the final draft of the report. I look forward to our meeting with the Meskwaki staff about this report. Sincerely yours, Thomas A. Wind, PE Wind Utility Consulting, PC Attachment: Wind Generation Feasibility Study Thomas A. Wind, PE [email protected] 1639 320TH STREET, JAMAICA, IOWA 50128 Wind Generation Feasibility Study for Meskwaki Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 2 ANALYSIS OF MET TOWER DATA .......................................................................................... 5 POTENTIAL WIND TURBINE SITES AND ENERGY PRODUCTION ................................. 12 CONNECTING TO THE GRID ................................................................................................... 21 USING WIND TURBINE PRODUCTION ................................................................................. 24
    [Show full text]