DOCSLIB.ORG

Detailed Pilot Overview Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detailed Pilot Overview Report Detailed pilot overview report (Detailed pilot description and demonstration plan/ Detailed pilot partner and structures description) Vienna, December 2017, v1.0 C-Roads pilot overview report Version 1.0 Table of contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. The Austrian Pilot site ...................................................................................................... 6 Pilot overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 Location ............................................................................................................................... 7 Involved partners ................................................................................................................. 7 Services and technologies covered by the Austrian pilot ...................................................... 8 Schedule .............................................................................................................................. 8 Demonstration plan .............................................................................................................. 8 3. The Belgium (Flanders) Pilot site ................................................................................... 10 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 10 Location ............................................................................................................................. 10 Implementing bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Services and technologies covered by the Belgium (Flanders) pilot ................................... 11 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 11 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 11 4. The Czech Pilot site ....................................................................................................... 13 Location ............................................................................................................................. 14 Implementing bodies .......................................................................................................... 15 Services and technologies covered by the Czech pilot ....................................................... 16 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 17 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 17 5. The French Pilot site ...................................................................................................... 20 Pilot overview (C-Roads France) ........................................................................................ 20 Location ............................................................................................................................. 20 Involved partners ............................................................................................................... 21 Services and technologies covered by the French pilot ...................................................... 21 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 21 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 22 Pilot overview (InterCor – French part) ............................................................................... 22 Location ............................................................................................................................. 22 Involved partners ............................................................................................................... 23 Services and technologies covered by the French pilot ...................................................... 23 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 23 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 23 6. The German (Hessia, Lower Saxony) Pilot site.............................................................. 24 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 24 Location ............................................................................................................................. 25 Implementing bodies .......................................................................................................... 26 Services and technologies covered by the German pilot .................................................... 27 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 27 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 28 7. The Dutch Pilot site ....................................................................................................... 29 Location ............................................................................................................................. 29 Implementing bodies .......................................................................................................... 29 Services and technologies covered by the Dutch pilot ........................................................ 30 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 30 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 31 8. The Slovenian Pilot site ................................................................................................. 33 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 33 Location ............................................................................................................................. 33 1 C-Roads pilot overview report Version 1.0 Involved partners ............................................................................................................... 34 Services and technologies covered by the Slovenian pilot ................................................. 34 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 35 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 35 9. The UK Pilot site ............................................................................................................ 36 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 36 Location ............................................................................................................................. 36 Involved partners ............................................................................................................... 37 Services and technologies covered by the UK pilot ............................................................ 37 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 37 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 37 10. The Belgium (Wallonia) Pilot site ................................................................................... 39 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 39 Location ............................................................................................................................. 39 Involved partners ............................................................................................................... 39 Services and technologies covered by the Belgium (Wallonia) pilot ................................... 40 Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 40 Demonstration plan ............................................................................................................ 40 11. The Danish Pilot site ...................................................................................................... 42 Pilot overview ..................................................................................................................... 42 Location ............................................................................................................................. 42 Involved partners ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call for Sites 2021 Justification Statement V3
    Planning Justification Statement Representation to Hertsmere Local Plan Process Commercial Redevelopment Land and Buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH March 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The Site 4 3. The Proposal 7 4. Exceptional Circumstances 12 5. Economic Need 16 6. Green Belt and Landscape 25 7. Transport and Accessibility 31 8. Flood Risk 34 9. Ecology and Trees 37 10. Heritage 40 11. Other Technical Matters 41 12. Case of Exceptional Circumstances 43 13. Conclusion 51 Appendix A: Site Planning History 1 1. Introduction This Planning Justification Statement is submitted by Warner Planning on behalf of Regen Properties LLP. This submission is made to the Hertsmere Borough Council 'Employment Land Call for Sites' 2021. We promote land and buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH for allocation for B8 with ancillary B1 commercial development. The hotel has been struggling for several years, which has been further compounded by the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the hotel is due to close in late 2021/early 2022. This statement, therefore, provides representations in respect of the whole site, including the hotel buildings and the land to the south-east of the building, which is part of the same plot. Through this statement, we will demonstrate that this is a credible and deliverable opportunity with no technical issues. This submission is supported by a wealth of technical reports, including: • Masterplans – UMC • Economic Benefits Assessment - Lichfields • Landscape Visual Overview – CSA Environmental • Ecology Overview- CSA Environmental • Aboricultural Assessment – DCCLA • Flood Risk and Drainage Apprisal – EAS • Transport Review – EAS • Desk Based Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – TRC • This Statement – Warner Planning • Market Report – Knight Frank • Employment Call for Sites Submission Form There are limited alternatives to this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Supply Chain Sustainability: South-East Finland Case Study
    Lähdeaho et al. Journal of Shipping and Trade (2020) 5:16 Journal of Shipping https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-020-00073-z and Trade ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Maritime supply chain sustainability: South- East Finland case study Oskari Lähdeaho1*, Olli-Pekka Hilmola1,2 and Riitta Kajatkari3 * Correspondence: oskari.lahdeaho@ lut.fi Abstract The article processing charge for this manuscript is supported by Emphasis on sustainability practices is growing globally in the shipping industry due China Merchants Energy Shipping. to regulations on emissions from transportation as well as increasing customer 1Kouvola Unit, LUT University, demand for sustainability. This research aims to shed light on the environmental Prikaatintie 9, FIN-45100 Kouvola, Finland sustainability of companies involved in maritime logistics at the major Finnish Full list of author information is seaport, HaminaKotka. This seaport is a part of International Maritime Organization’s available at the end of the article (IMO) Baltic and North Sea emission control area, with special emission-reducing measures contributing directly to United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by mitigating negative impacts of industrial activity on environment and climate change. Two semi-structured interviews with companies at HaminaKotka were carried out to construct a case study examining the sustainability challenges at hand. In addition, experience of one of the authors in a managerial position at the studied seaport complex, as well as the sustainability communications of the companies situated in the area were used to support the findings. The companies improve environmental sustainability by using multimodal transport chains, alternative fuels in the transports, and environmental sustainability demands towards their partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Corridor Work Plan
    Mediterranean Work Plan of the European Coordinator Laurens Jan Brinkhorst Transport MAY 2015 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. 1. Towards the Mediterranean Corridor work plan On 1 January 2014 a new era has begun in European infrastructure policy with the setting up of nine core network corridors led by a European coordinator and the creation of the Connecting Europe Facility as financing instrument. This new framework includes not only the Member States but also all other stakeholders of the Corridor: infrastructure managers (for road, rail, ports, inland waterways, airports and multi-modal terminals), regions and representatives of the transport industry as users of the infrastructure. All these stakeholders come together in the Corridor Forum: four meetings of the Corridor Forum have been held in 2014 and have functioned as unique platform allowing a transparent and constantly deepening dialogue. Furthermore, the Corridor Forum served as the “testing ground” of many of the findings and recommendations presented in this document. This work plan is largely based on the study of the Mediterranean corridor (the Corridor Study) carried out in 2014. It is presented as the result of the collaborative efforts of the Member States, the European Commission, external consultants and chaired by the European Coordinator. The work plan has been elaborated in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 which establishes Union guidelines for the development of the trans- European transport network (the Regulation)1. The concept of core network corridors rests on three pillars: modal integration, interoperability and the coordinated development of its infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brochure Visit Adriatic Museums: from Italy to the Balkans
    Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans This document has been produced with the financial assistance the museumcultour project 04 of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme. The project partners 05 contents of this document are the sole responsibility of DELTA the adriatic photo exhibition 08 2000 soc. Cons a .rl. under no circumstances be regarded museums’ network 11 as reflecting the position of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border italy Cooperation Programme Authorities. museo del mare di san benedetto del tronto 13 Pubblication realized by DELTA 2000, Consortium Company with limited liability, musei della cartiera papale di ascoli piceno 18 Ostellato (ITALY) www.deltaduemila.net museo natura di sant’alberto 25 In cooperation with: ecomuseo di argenta 30 Ecomuseo di Argenta (FE - ITALY) www.vallidiargenta.org manifattura dei marinati comacchio 35 Manifattura dei Marinati, Comacchio (FE - ITALY) www.aqua-deltadelpo.com museo del territorio di ostellato 40 Musei della Cartiera Papale di Ascoli Piceno (AP - ITALY) www.museicartierapapale.it Museo del Cervo e del Bosco della Mesola, Mesola (FE - ITALY) www.prolocomesola.it museo del cervo e del bosco della mesola 45 Museo del Mare di San Benedetto del Tronto (AP - ITALY) www.museodelmaresbt.it slovenia Museo del Territorio di Ostellato (FE - ITALY) www.atlantide.net Museo NatuRa, Sant’Alberto (RA - ITALY) www.atlantide.net notranjski muzej postojna 51 Muzeumet Berat (ALBANIA) www.muzeumet-berat.al postojnska jama cave-grotte-höhle
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • The M1 Motorway (Junctions 5 – 6A
    THE M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 5–6A) TEMPORARYOVERNIGHT CLOSURES Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited(a) intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway,inthe County of Hertfordshire, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closureofthe following – (a) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 5(A41, A4008); (b) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 6(A405); and (c) the link road leading from the southbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 6A to both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 21. These measures would be in the interest of road safety to enable contractors to undertake cyclical maintenance work. It is expected that the work would take place for approximately 1-2nights for each closureat(a) –(c) above every two months at the following times: Monday-Thursday nights 22:00 –05:30 Friday nights 23:00 –06:00 Saturday nights 22:00 –06:00 Sunday nights 22:30 –05:30 The Order would come into force on 1August2017 and have amaximum duration of twelve months. During the closures outlined above, traffic affected would be diverted using other junctions of the M1, the A41, the A405 and the A410. The slip road closures, link road closureand diversion routes would be clearly indicated by traffic signs throughout the works periods. MTaylor, an official of Highways England Company Limited Ref: HA/M1/35/3/1894 (a)Registered in England and Wales under company no.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION of the EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.8.2003
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.8.2003 SEC(2003) 849 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ANNEXES TO the TEN Annual Report for the Year 2001 {COM(2003) 442 final} COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ANNEXES TO the TEN Annual Report for the Year 2001 Data and Factsheets The present Commission Staff Working Paper is intended to complementing the Trans- European Networks (TEN) Annual Report for the Year 2001 (COM(2002)344 final. It consists of ten annexes, each covering a particular information area, and providing extensive information and data reference on the implementation and financing of the TEN for Energy, Transport and Telecommunications. 2 INDEX Pages Annex I : List of abbreviations .....................................................................................................4 Annex II : Information on TEN-T Priority Projects ......................................................................6 Annex III : Community financial support for Trans-European Network Projects in the energy sector during the period from 1995 to 2001 (from the TEN-energy budget line) ......24 Annex IV Progress achieved on specific TEN-ISDN / Telecom projects from 1997 to 2001....36 Annex V: Community financial support in 2001 for the co-financing of actions related to Trans-European Network Projects in the energy sector .............................................58 Annex VI : TEN-Telecom projects financed in 2001 following the 2001 call for proposals .......61 Annex VII : TEN-T Projects/Studies financed in 2001 under Regulation 2236/95
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 Report Annual Svevia Content
    Svevia Annual Report 2010 Content Svevia in figures 1 Comments from the CEO 2 Vision, goals and strategies 4 Business world and the market 6 Annual Report 2010 Core operation — road management 8 and maintenance Core operation — civil engineering 10 Strategic specialty operations 12 Organisation 14 Control for higher profitability 16 Svevia’s sustainability report 18 Corporate Governance Report 32 Board of Directors and management 36 Financial reports 38 Administration report 39 More information about Svevia 80 Own path Svevia Box 4018 SE-171 04 Solna Sweden www.svevia.se Svevia Annual Report 2010 Contents Svevia in figures 1 Comments from the CEO 2 Vision, goals and strategies 4 Business world and the market 6 Annual Report 2010 Core operation — road management 8 and maintenance Core operation — civil engineering 10 Strategic specialty operations 12 Organisation 14 Control for higher profitability 16 Svevia’s sustainability report 18 Corporate Governance Report 32 Board of Directors and management 36 Financial reports 38 Administration report 39 More information about Svevia 80 Own path Svevia Box 4018 SE-171 04 Solna Sweden www.svevia.se This is Svevia Leading in infrastructure Addresses Solna Head office Regional Office, Central Svevia Box 4018 SE-171 04 Solna Visit address: Hemvärnsgatan 15 Tel: +46 (0(8-404 10 00 Fax: +46 (0(8-404 10 50 Own path Reliability and consideration Attractive workplace Svevia is a company that has chosen its own Svevia is the reliable and considerate contrac- Svevia aims to be an exemplary employer Umeå path. We focus on building and maintaining ting company that dares to be innovative.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 24.04.2020
    DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. Reporting time: 13.30 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 1-2 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia:.no delays. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 1-2 km long waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 2-3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 10 minutes (1 truck). As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap. The trucks from Serbia that are transiting through Romania can use Vatin border crossing. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. B OSN I A AND HERZEGO VINA Gradiška: • 30 trucks waiting on BiH exit. • There is a waiting line at the Croatian checkpoint on BiH entry, waiting time 5 hours. • There are a lot of vehicles at the customs terminal Gardiška.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-3), M25
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-3), M25 MOTORWAYJUNCTION 23, AND A1 TRUNK ROAD TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M25 Motorway in the County of Hertfordshire and the London Boroughs of Barnet and Hendon, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works are proposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closure, in phases, of:- a) the entirecirculatory carriageway of the roundabout at M25 Junction 23 (A1(M)/A1); b) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); c) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the A1(M)/A1 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); d) the southbound carriageway of the A1 between Bignell’sCorner (M25 Junction 23) and Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); e) the road leading from the southbound carriageway of the A1 at Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); f) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between Junction 1(A406) and the tip of the nosing of the entry slip road at Junction 3 (London Gateway Services); g) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); h) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); i) theroads connecting to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 2(A1); and j) all of the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services.
    [Show full text]