DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies, and Spaceports January 2007 HQ-002407.INDD 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Space Competitions . .1 Expendable Launch Vehicle Industry . .2 Reusable Launch Vehicle Industry . .2 Reentry Vehicles and In-Space Technologies . .3 Enabling Technologies . .3 Spaceports . .3 Significant 2006 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Wirefly X Prize Cup . .6 America’s Space Prize . .7 Centennial Challenges . .7 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 – Lockheed Martin Corporation/ULA . .9 Delta 2 – The Boeing Company/ULA . .10 Delta 4 – The Boeing Company/ULA . .11 Minotaur 1 and 4 – Orbital Sciences Corporation . .11 Pegasus – Orbital Sciences Corporation . .12 Taurus – Orbital Sciences Corporation . .12 Zenit-3SL – Sea Launch Company, LLC . .12 ELV Development Efforts . .13 ALV – Alliant Techsystems . .13 Aquarius – Space Systems/Loral . .13 Eagle S-series – E’Prime Aerospace Corporation . .14 FALCON SLV – Lockheed Martin Michoud Operations . .14 Nanosat Launch Vehicle – Garvey Spacecraft Corporation . .15 Eagle SLV – Microcosm, Inc. .15 QuickReach – AirLaunch LLC . .16 Z-1 – Zig Aerospace, LLC . .16 Zenit-3SLB – Sea Launch Company, LLC, and Space International Services . .17 NASA Exploration Launch Vehicles . .17 Ares 1 . .17 Ares 5 . .18 Sounding Rockets . .18 Black Brant – Bristol Aerospace Limited . .18 Oriole – DTI Associates . .18 Terrier-Orion – DTI Associates . .19 Hybrid Sounding Rocket Program – Lockheed Martin-Michoud . .19 Norwegian Sounding Rocket Program – Lockheed Martin-Michoud . .19 SpaceLoft XL – UP Aerospace . .20 Reusable Launch Vehicles . .21 Commercial RLV Development Efforts . .21 Quad – Armadillo Aerospace . .21 New Shepard – Blue Origin . .22 Sea Star – Interorbital Systems . .22 Neptune – Interorbital Systems . .22 XA 1.0 – Masten Space Systems . .23 K-1 – Rocketplane Kistler . .23 Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation iii Contents 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Rocketplane XP – Rocketplane Kistler . .24 SpaceShipTwo – Scaled Composites, LLC/Virgin Galactic . .25 Dream Chaser – SpaceDev . .25 Falcon 1 – Space Exploration Technologies Corporation . .26 Falcon 9 – Space Exploration Technologies Corporation . .26 Altairis – Sprague Astronautics . .27 Michelle-B – TGV Rockets, Inc. .27 Xerus – XCOR Aerospace . .28 Government RLV Development Efforts . .28 Space Shuttle . .28 Affordable Responsive Spacelift . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Launch Vehicles Exos Aerospace Is Making
    Reusable Launch Vehicles Exos Aerospace is making SPACEavailable…TM The 4 FAA/AST The other 6 of 10 Licensed Reusable EXOS AEROSPACE is… “Non-Reusable Rocket Launch Rocket” Launch Providers Providers companies of companies of 1 4 IN THE 1 10 in the United WORLD with a licensed States with an Active reusable rocket. Launch License $ <10% reuse cost Access to space $$ 25% reuse cost is too inflexible Air Launch Provides for increased flexibility $$ reuse cost… % unknown (Exos, Virgin Orbit, Lockheed Martin) Reusability Enables increased ROI through cost reductions (Exos, SpaceX, Blue Origin) 1- Ignition 2- Clean Lox Ethanol Engine (launch) Apogee SARGE Flight 1 3- Drogue Return to 4.- Canopy Return from reenter the atmosphere Rocket flight 3 Our team has built hundreds of rocket engines and dozens of suborbital flying vehicles designed for reusability TEAM’S PAST EXPERIENCE Vehicle Evolution (20+ Years) Armadillo 4 Launches and 3 Rocket Racing st J Aerospace Lunar recoveries on 1 League SARGE vehicle Founded by Lander development SARGE a st John Carmack Challenge 1 Today program Super Mod Aug 2018 – Oct 2019 SARGE-LW Place g u a r 2000 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2015 2020 Apr 2020 Air Force X-Prize Lunar lander 2010-2013 Stig Exos Aerospace Hypersonic Challenge2009 flies to 95km acquires assets of Contract Competition Armadillo Aerospace Armadillo prize $ w/Pixel and and brings on the team Testing SARGE R2 J Texel Round 1 winner- NASA with new management for return to flight Winners Morpheus Sale supporting commercial post COVID 19 a objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180006397 2019-08-31T18:36:43+00:00Z NASA’s Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat: Phase II Outcomes and Phase III Competition Overview Prater, T.J.1, T. Kim2, M. Roman2, R. Mueller3 1NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Materials and Processes Laboratory 2NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Centennial Challenges Program Office 3NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Senior Technologist The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge is part of NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program. NASA’s Centennial Challenges seek to accelerate innovation in aerospace technology development through public competitions. The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge, launched in 2015, is part of the Centennial Challenges portfolio and focuses on habitat design and development of large-scale additive construction systems capable of fabricating structures from in situ materials and/or mission recyclables. The challenge is a partnership between NASA, Caterpillar (primary sponsor), Bechtel, Brick and Mortar Ventures, and Bradley University. Phase I of the challenge was an architectural concept competition in which participants generated conceptual renderings of habitats on Mars which could be constructed using locally available resources. Phase II asked teams to develop the printing systems and material formulations needed to translate these designs into reality. Work under the phase II competition, which concluded in August 2017 with a head to head competition at Caterpillar’s Edward Demonstration Facility in Peoria, Illinois, is discussed, including the key technology development outcomes resulting from this portion of the competition. The phase III competition consists of both virtual and construction subcompetitions. Virtual construction asks teams to render high fidelity architectural models of a habitat and all the accompanying information required for construction of the pressure retaining and load bearing portions of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborbital Platforms and Range Services (SPARS)
    Suborbital Capabilities for Science & Technology Small Missions Workshop @ Johns Hopkins University June 10, 2019 Mike Hitch, Giovanni Rosanova Goddard Space Introduction Flight Center AGENDAWASP OPIS ▪ Purpose ▪ History & Importance of Suborbital Carriers to Science ▪ Suborbital Platforms ▪ Sounding Rockets ▪ Balloons (brief) ▪ Aircraft ▪ SmallSats ▪ WFF Engineering ▪ Q & A P-3 Maintenance 12-Jun-19 Competition Sensitive – Do Not Distribute 2 Goddard Space Purpose of the Meeting Flight Center Define theWASP OPISutility of Suborbital Carriers & “Small” Missions ▪ Sounding rockets, balloons and aircraft (manned and unmanned) provide a unique capability to scientists and engineers to: ▪ Allow PIs to enhance and advance technology readiness levels of instruments and components for very low relative cost ▪ Provide PIs actual science flight opportunities as a “piggy-back” on a planned mission flight at low relative cost ▪ Increase experience for young and mid-career scientists and engineers by allowing them to get their “feet wet” on a suborbital mission prior to tackling the much larger and more complex orbital endeavors ▪ The Suborbital/Smallsat Platforms And Range Services (SPARS) Line Of Business (LOB) can facilitate prospective PIs with taking advantage of potential suborbital flight opportunities P-3 Maintenance 12-Jun-19 Competition Sensitive – Do Not Distribute 3 Goddard Space Value of Suborbital Research – What’s Different? Flight Center WASP OPIS Different Risk/Mission Assurance Strategy • Payloads are recovered and refurbished. • Re-flights are inexpensive (<$1M for a balloon or sounding rocket vs >$10M - 100M for a ELV) • Instrumentation can be simple and have a large science impact! • Frequent flight opportunities (e.g. “piggyback”) • Development of precursor instrument concepts and mature TRLs • While Suborbital missions fully comply with all Agency Safety policies, the program is designed to take Higher Programmatic Risk – Lower cost – Faster migration of new technology – Smaller more focused efforts, enable Tiger Team/incubator experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Launchers
    SMALL SATELLITE LAUNCHERS NewSpace Index 2020/04/20 Current status and time from development start to the first successful or planned orbital launch NEWSPACE.IM Northrop Grumman Pegasus 1990 Scorpius Space Launch Demi-Sprite ? Makeyev OKB Shtil 1998 Interorbital Systems NEPTUNE N1 ? SpaceX Falcon 1e 2008 Interstellar Technologies Zero 2021 MT Aerospace MTA, WARR, Daneo ? Rocket Lab Electron 2017 Nammo North Star 2020 CTA VLM 2020 Acrux Montenegro ? Frontier Astronautics ? ? Earth to Sky ? 2021 Zero 2 Infinity Bloostar ? CASIC / ExPace Kuaizhou-1A (Fei Tian 1) 2017 SpaceLS Prometheus-1 ? MISHAAL Aerospace M-OV ? CONAE Tronador II 2020 TLON Space Aventura I ? Rocketcrafters Intrepid-1 2020 ARCA Space Haas 2CA ? Aerojet Rocketdyne SPARK / Super Strypi 2015 Generation Orbit GoLauncher 2 ? PLD Space Miura 5 (Arion 2) 2021 Swiss Space Systems SOAR 2018 Heliaq ALV-2 ? Gilmour Space Eris-S 2021 Roketsan UFS 2023 Independence-X DNLV 2021 Beyond Earth ? ? Bagaveev Corporation Bagaveev ? Open Space Orbital Neutrino I ? LIA Aerospace Procyon 2026 JAXA SS-520-4 2017 Swedish Space Corporation Rainbow 2021 SpinLaunch ? 2022 Pipeline2Space ? ? Perigee Blue Whale 2020 Link Space New Line 1 2021 Lin Industrial Taymyr-1A ? Leaf Space Primo ? Firefly 2020 Exos Aerospace Jaguar ? Cubecab Cab-3A 2022 Celestia Aerospace Space Arrow CM ? bluShift Aerospace Red Dwarf 2022 Black Arrow Black Arrow 2 ? Tranquility Aerospace Devon Two ? Masterra Space MINSAT-2000 2021 LEO Launcher & Logistics ? ? ISRO SSLV (PSLV Light) 2020 Wagner Industries Konshu ? VSAT ? ? VALT
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017 A Nasdaq-100 Company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¶VKLVWRULFDOO\ORZSD\79VDWLVIDFWLRQZLWK³7XQHG,Q7R<RX´D',6+79SURPLVHWROLVWHQWRDQG ILJKWIRUFXVWRPHUV:HLQWURGXFHGZKROHKRPHKDQGVIUHH79DVWKHILUVWSD\79SURYLGHUWRLQWHJUDWH$OH[DYRLFHFRQWURO $VWKH\HDUFORVHG',6+79ZDVUDQNHGLQ&XVWRPHU6HUYLFHQDWLRQDOO\E\-'3RZHUDQGRXUFXVWRPHUV 6OLQJ79ZDVWKHILUVWDQGUHPDLQVWKHOHDGLQJOLYHDQGRQGHPDQGVWUHDPLQJVHUYLFH:HEXLOWDGLIIHUHQWPRGHOWKDWJLYHV
    [Show full text]
  • Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites Presented by: Dr. Michael Gazarik Associate Administrator, Space Technology Mission Directorate August 12, 2013 www.nasa.gov/spacetech Why Invest in Space Technology? • Enables a new class of NASA missions Addresses National Needs beyond low Earth Orbit. A generation of studies and reports • Delivers innovative solutions that (40+ since 1980) document the need dramatically improve technological for regular investment in new, capabilities for NASA and the Nation. transformative space • Develops technologies and capabilities that technologies. make NASA’s missions more affordable and more reliable. • Invests in the economy by creating markets and spurring innovation for traditional and emerging aerospace business. • Engages the brightest minds from academia in solving NASA’s tough technological challenges. Who: Value to NASA Value to the Nation The NASA Workforce Academia Industry & Small Businesses Other Government Agencies The Broader Aerospace Enterprise 2 Challenges for Deep Space Exploration Trends in Space Technology Space Technology Portfolio Early Stage Innovation Technology Technology Technology Crosscutting Game Changing Small Spacecraft Breakthroughs Demonstration Transformative & Transformative Development (ETD/CSTD) Missions (ETD/CSTD) Technologies (CSTD) Concepts/ Concepts/ Pioneering Pioneering Innovation Innovation Developing Developing Community NASA Innovative Space Technology Center Innovation
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Present, and Future
    Rockets: Past, Present, and Future Robert Goddard With his Original Rocket system Delta IV … biggest commercial Rocket system currently in US arsenal Material from Rockets into Space by Frank H. Winter, ISBN 0-674-77660-7 MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Earliest Rockets as weapons • Chinese development, Sung dynasty (A.D. 960-1279) – Primarily psychological • William Congreve, England, 1804 – thus “the rockets red glare” during the war of 1812. – 1.5 mile range, very poor accuracy. • V2 in WWII MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems First Principle of Rocket Flight • “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Isaac Newton, 1687, following Archytas of Tarentum, 360 BC, and Hero of Alexandria, circa 50 AD. • “Rockets move because the flame pushes against the surrounding air.” Edme Mariotte, 1717 • Which one is correct? MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Isaac Newton explains how to launch a Satellite MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems The Reaction-propelled Spaceship of Hermann Ganswindt (1890) • The fuel for his spaceship consisted of heavy steel cartridges with dynamite charges. They were to be fed machine gun style into a reaction chamber where they would fire and be dropped away. • “Shock absorbers protected the travelers” MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems The Three Amigos of Spaceflight Theory • Konstantin Tsiolkovsky • Hermann Oberth • Robert Goddard • Independent and parallel development of Rocket theory MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Three Amigos • Goddard • Oberth • Tsiolkovsky MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Konstantin Tsiolkovsky 1857 - 1935 • Deaf Russian School Teacher - fascinated with space flight, started by writing Science Fiction Novels • Discovered that practical space flight depended on liquid fuel rockets in the 1890’s, and developed the fundamental Rocket equation in 1897.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHOSPHERE LLC Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM S-4 Registration of securities issued in business combination transactions Filing Date: 2011-07-01 SEC Accession No. 0001104659-11-037405 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER ECHOSPHERE LLC Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S. MERIDIAN 9601 S. MERIDIAN CIK:920433| IRS No.: 840833457 | State of Incorp.:CO | Fiscal Year End: 1231 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 Type: S-4 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-175277-01 | Film No.: 11943572 3037231277 SIC: 4841 Cable & other pay television services DISH Network LLC Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S MERIDIAN BLVD 9601 S MERIDIAN BLVD CIK:920436| IRS No.: 841114039 | State of Incorp.:CO | Fiscal Year End: 1231 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 Type: S-4 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-175277-03 | Film No.: 11943574 3037231000 SIC: 4841 Cable & other pay television services DISH DBS CORP Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S. MERIDIAN BLVD. 9601 S. MERIDIAN BLVD. CIK:1042642| IRS No.: 841328967 | State of Incorp.:CO | Fiscal Year End: 1231 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 Type: S-4 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-175277 | Film No.: 11943571 3037231277 SIC: 4899 Communications services, nec DISH NETWORK SERVICE LLC Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S. MERIDIAN BLVD. 9601 S. MERIDIAN BLVD. CIK:1175721| IRS No.: 841195952 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 Type: S-4 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-175277-04 | Film No.: 11943575 3037231277 DISH OPERATING L.L.C. Mailing Address Business Address 9601 S MERIDIAN BLVD 9601 S MERIDIAN BLVD CIK:1285646| IRS No.: 200715965 | State of Incorp.:CO | Fiscal Year End: 1231 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 Type: S-4 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-175277-02 | Film No.: 11943573 3037231000 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launch Vehicles a 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser
    Small Launch Vehicles A 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser An update to this survey will be presented at the 2016 Internaonal Astronau9cal Congress 1 Agenda Overview of Small Launch Vehicles Launch Method/Locations Launch Performance Projected Launch Costs Individual Rocket Details Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 2 Listing Criteria Have a maximum capability to LEO of 1000 kg (definition of LEO left to the LV provider). The effort must be for the development of an entire launch vehicle system (with the exception of carrier aircraft for air launch vehicles). Mentioned through a web site update, social media, traditional media, conference paper, press release, etc. sometime after 2010. Have a stated goal of completing a fully operational space launch (orbital) vehicle. Funded concept or feasibility studies by government agencies, patents for new launch methods, etc., do not qualify. Expect to be widely available commercially or to the U.S. Government No specific indication that the effort has been cancelled, closed, or otherwise disbanded. Correc&ons, addi&ons, and comments are welcomed and encouraged! Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 3 We did not … … Talk to the individual companies … Rely on any proprietary/confidential information … Verify accuracy of data found in public resources Ø Primarily relied on companies’ web sites Funding sources, when listed, are not implied to be the vehicles sole or even majority funding source. We do not make any value judgements on technical or financial credibility
    [Show full text]
  • A Low-Cost Launch Assistance System for Orbital Launch Vehicles
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Aerospace Engineering Volume 2012, Article ID 830536, 10 pages doi:10.1155/2012/830536 Review Article A Low-Cost Launch Assistance System for Orbital Launch Vehicles Oleg Nizhnik ERATO Maenaka Human-Sensing Fusion Project, 8111, Shosha 2167, Hyogo-ken, Himeji-shi, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Oleg Nizhnik, [email protected] Received 17 February 2012; Revised 6 April 2012; Accepted 16 April 2012 Academic Editor: Kenneth M. Sobel Copyright © 2012 Oleg Nizhnik. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The author reviews the state of art of nonrocket launch assistance systems (LASs) for spaceflight focusing on air launch options. The author proposes an alternative technologically feasible LAS based on a combination of approaches: air launch, high-altitude balloon, and tethered LAS. Proposed LAS can be implemented with the existing off-the-shelf hardware delivering 7 kg to low-earth orbit for the 5200 USD per kg. Proposed design can deliver larger reduction in price and larger orbital payloads with the future advances in the aerostats, ropes, electrical motors, and terrestrial power networks. 1. Introduction point to the progress in the orbital delivery systems for these additional payload classes. Spaceflight is the mature engineering discipline—54 years old as of 2012. But seemingly paradoxically, it still relies solely 2. Overview of Previously Proposed LAS on the hardware and methodology developed in the very beginning of the spaceflight era. Modernly, still heavily-used A lot of proposals have been made to implement nonrocket Soyuz launch vehicle systems (LVSs) are the evolutionary LASandarelistedinTable 1.
    [Show full text]