DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1: the Prose Works of Sir Walter Ralegh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix 1: The Prose Works of Sir Walter Ralegh The following survey of the prose works of Ralegh is intended to com­ plement the preceding chapters. It is necessary because of the absence of a modem, critical edition of Ralegh's works, and should be consulted alongside other, more substantial, bibliographical tools, such as the Index of Literary Manuscripts and the Short Title Catalogue of English Books. The original date of composition for each work is given, together with informa­ tion about subsequent editions. For each work it should be possible to ascertain the relationship between manuscript and printed texts. Selected texts receive more detailed coverage because more bibliographical information is needed for an understanding of the related chapter. This is not intended to be a definitive analysis of the prose canon. The problems facing an editor of Ralegh's work are formidable, and an entire study could be devoted to the subject. As Peter Heal, the editor of the Index of Literary Manuscripts points out, 'since so few of his works were pub­ lished in his lifetime, and since many anonymous poems and tracts were posthumously attributed to him, the canon is highly problematical' (1. ii. 365). These difficulties were no doubt responsible for the decision, taken by the Clarendon Press some years ago, to abandon the preparation of an edition of the collected works. The most recent contribution to this area of study is Sir Walter Ralegh: An Annotated Bibliography, compiled by Chris­ topher M. Armitage (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987). The texts are organised by date of writing, rather than by date of pub­ lication. M.C. selected information about surviving manuscript copies. F.P. date and form of first publication. 1591: A Report of the Trvth of the fight about the Iles of Afores, this last Sommer. Betwixt the Reuenge, one of her Maiesties Shippes. And an Armada of the King of Spaine. M.C.: None known. F.P.: 1591; anonymous pamphlet, entered in Stationer's Register, 23 November: London: J. Windet for W. Ponsonbie. First edition ascribed to Ralegh: 1599 I 1600, Richard Hakluyt, Principal Navigations. February 1592/3: On the Succession. M.C.: Hatfield House, Cecil Papers 139/139-40v, AUTOGRAPH. Only sur­ viving MS. F.P.: 1960; Pierre Lefranc, Etudes Anglaises, 13 (1960) 38-46. 1595: The Discoverie of the large, rich and bewtiful Empire of Guiana. M.C.: c.1595(?) Lambeth Palace, MS Tenison 250, ff.315a-337 (without ded­ ications). Only surviving MS. F.P.: 1596 (three editions). 179 180 Sir Walter Ralegh and his Readers Summer 1596: A Relation of the Action at Cadiz. M.C.: Dr Williams Library, MS Jones B60, pp. 1-15, directed to the Earl of Northumberland. Only one other MS. F.P.: 1700; Echard, Laurence, An Abridgement of Sir Walter Raleigh's History of the World in Five Books ... with some genuine remains publ. by P. Raleigh, (London: Matthew Gelliflower). 1596: Opinions Delivered by the Earl of Essex, Lord Burleigh, Lord Willoughby, Lord North, Sir William Knollys, Sir Walter Raleigh, and Sir George Carew, on the Alarm of an Invasion from Spain in the Year 1596, and the Measures proper to be taken on the occasion. M.C.: MS Tanner 235, ff.18-22. Only one other MS. F.P.: 1829; Works. c.1602-3: Considerations concerning Reprisalls. M.C.: Public Record Office, S.P. 12.253.117, AUTOGRAPH. F.P.: 1864; J. P. Collier, N.Q. 5 (1864) 208. 1603: A Discourse touching a War with Spain, and of the protecting of the Netherlands. M.C.: MS Tanner 103 and numerous other copies. F.P.: 1702; in Three Discourses of Sir Walter Ralegh as Of a War with Spain, and our protecting the Netherlands. 1608-10 (?):A Discourse of the Invention of Ships, Anchors, Compass & c. M.C.: British Library, Sloane MS 1856, ff.50v--6v. Five other copies. F.P.: 1650; Judicious and Select Essayes and Observations by that Renowned and Learned Knight Sir Walter Ralegh (London: Humphrey Moseley). 1608-10 (?): Of the Art of Warre by Sea. (fragments of plans and contents pages) M.C.: British Library, Cotton MS Titus B VIII, ff.226, 228, AUTOGRAPH: Dr. William's Library, MS Jones B60, pp. 230-4, AUTOGRAPH. F.P.: 1968; Pierre Lefranc, Sir Walter Ralegh, ecrivain (Paris: Librarie Armand). 1597--8, 1607-10 and after 1612: Observations and Notes concerning the Royal Navy and Sea-Service. (Some versions are ascribed to Sir Arthur Gorges.) Three distinct manuscript versions. M.C.: 1597--8. For Folger library (MS J.a.1, not listed in ILM) see Gossett (1987). 1608. British Library, Add. MS 9298, ff.39-54v: 'Excellent Obser­ vations and Notes, concerning the Royall Navy and Sea Service written by sr Walter Rawleigh and by him Dedicated to the most noble and illustrious Prince, Henry, Prince of Wales: H:H.' Carries no mention of the death of Prince Henry. Post-1612. Introductions written after Henry's death. MS Ballard 52, ff.125-36v (c.1640s) published by Sandison in Modem Language Association of America, ed., Essays and Studies in Honor of Carleton Brown (New York: New York University Press, 1940). Two manu­ scripts ascribed to Arthur Gorges: British Library, Harley MS 4311 and R.P. 3898 (microfiche), a presentation copy from Gorges. F.P.: 1625; Ilands Voyage printed in Purchas his Pi/grimes (London). Observations (1608 version) printed 1650 in Judicious and Select Essayes and Observations by that Renowned and Learned Knight Sir Walter Ralegh. The Prose Works of Sir Walter Ralegh 181 1609 (?): Instructions to his Son and to Posterity. M.C.: British Library, Add. MS 22587, ff.ll-16 (chapters I-IX only and letter): Inner Temple, Petyt MS 538, Vol. 18, f.215. No other MSS. F.P.: 1632; six more editions before 1636, with the addition of the Advice of a Loving Son to his Aged Father (attributed to Ralegh). Published with Maxims of State (also attributed to Ralegh) in 1642, 1650, 1651, etc. 1612 (?): Touching a Marriage between Prince Henry of England and a Daughter of Savoy (possibly a later date if it refers to Prince Charles) M.C.: 'Copy in volume of tracts owned by Ralegh' (I.L.M.). This volume is in the possession of a private collector who will not permit access. Numerous other copies including British Library, MS Carte 77, ff.89-102. F.P.: 1750; The Interest of England with regard to Foreign Alliances, explained in two discourses. 1612: Concerning a Match propounded by the Savoyan, between the Lady Eli­ zabeth and the Prince of Piedmont. M.C.: 'Copy in volume of tracts owned by R' (I.L.M.); see above. Numerous other MSS from early to mid-seventeenth century. F.P.: 1750; The Interest of England with regard to Foreign Alliances, explained in two discourses. 1610-14 (?): Notebook. M.C.: British Library, Add. MS 57555, AUTOGRAPH. F.P.: 1952-68; extracts printed in The Times, 29 November 1952; Walter Oakeshott, The Queen and the Poet, 1960; and Walter Oakeshott, 'Sir Walter Ralegh's Library', Library, 23 (1968) 285-327. 1614: The History of the World. M.C.: No manuscript copies; notes for The History appear in Notebook (see above). F.P.: 1614; anonymous publication. See John Racin, Sir Walter Ralegh as Historian, (Salzburg: Institut fiir Englische Sprache und Literatur, 1974) for further details of publication. 1615: A Dialogue between a Counsellor of State and a Justice of Peace (published in 1628 with the title The Prerogative of Parliaments in England). M.C.: There are two distinct versions of the text; one complete, the other considerably abridged. For ease of reference these will be indicated as Text 1 (complete) and Text 2 (abridged). Both Texts 1 and 2 were submitted to King James late in 1615. All manuscript copies have roughly, if not pre­ cisely, similar variants to the printed edition, unless otherwise stated. Comparison of manuscript with print version reveals such minor variants as: inversions of syntax, abbreviations of words (unto/upon becomes to/ on), plural to singular, and vice versa. More important are the infrequent changes in the sense of the text. The MS often gives a 'better' (in terms of meaning and interest) reading, although this is not always the case. Points of interest in each MS are noted in bold. Bradfer Lawrence 61, ff.148-70v. 'Copy with a few minor autograph corrections and additions in the ded­ icatory epistle to King James, in a volume of tracts owned by R. (I.L.M.)' This manuscript was until recently owned by Bradfer-Lawrence family, 182 Sir Walter Ralegh and his Readers but was then sold to a 'secretive' private collector by Quaritch. All attempts to pursue this private collector have failed. S.P. 14/85 (Text 1) Date: 1615. S.P. 14/84/44 (Text 2) Date: (December?) 1615. Marked as 'Sr Walter Ralegh Dialogue 1615'. British Library, Harley MS 6191 (Text 1) Date: late (?) seventeenth century: heavily annotated. The similar MS variants suggest there was a transmission tradition stretching into the late seventeenth century which did not refer to the printed edition. Dr William's Library, MS Jones 56, ff.36v-46v (Incomplete text 1) Date:(?) Ends at p. 17 of 1628 published edition. Port Eliot, Cornwall annotated by John Eliot. Property of Lord Eliot (Text 1) Date: 1620s. Carries Sir John Eliot's marginal annotations. Exeter College, Oxford, MS 139, ff.190v-2. (Text 1) Date: (?) early-mid-seventeenth century. In a collection of parliamentary material. Title given is: 'A Dialogue ... of the Successe of Parliam15 since the conquest to this time written in the Tower of London by Sir Walter Raleigh and dedicated to King James our soueraigne Lord.
Recommended publications
  • Who Was Sir Walter Raleigh?

    Who Was Sir Walter Raleigh?

    Who Was Sir Walter Raleigh? Sir Walter Raleigh was an English explorer, soldier and writer. At age 17, he fought with the French Huguenots and later studied at Oxford. He became a favourite of Queen Elizabeth after serving in her army in Ireland. He was knighted in 1585, and within two years became Captain of the Queen's Guard. Between 1584 and 1589, he helped establish a colony near Roanoke Island (present-day North Carolina), which he named Virginia. Accused of treason by King James I, Sir Walter Raleigh was imprisoned and eventually put to death. When Was Sir Walter Raleigh Born? Historians believe Walter Raleigh was born in 1552, or possibly 1554, and grew up in a farmhouse near the village of East Budleigh in Devon. Early Life The youngest of five sons born to Catherine Champermowne, his father, Walter Raleigh, was his mother’s second husband. Like young Raleigh, his relatives, Sir Richard Grenville and Sir Humphry Gilbert were prominent during the reigns of Elizabeth I and James I. Raised as a devout Protestant, Raleigh’s family faced persecution under Queen Mary I, a Catholic, and as a result, young Raleigh developed a life-long hatred for Roman Catholicism. Sir Walter Raleigh and Queen Elizabeth I Between 1579 and 1583, Raleigh fought in the service of Queen Elizabeth I in Ireland. Tall, handsome and superbly self-confident, Raleigh rose rapidly at Elizabeth I’s court upon his return and quickly became a favourite. She rewarded him with a large estate in Ireland, monopolies, trade privileges, a knighthood and the right to colonize North America.
  • Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton

    Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton

    C01.qxd 8/18/08 14:44 Page 1 Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton In 1645, Milton published most but not all of the poems he had composed by that date. The publisher Humphrey Moseley had been bringing out volumes of lyric poetry by royalist poets such as Edmund Waller, and it was likely, as he claims in the intro- duction to the volume, that he approached Milton and encouraged him to publish his verse. Moseley also arranged for the engraved portrait of Milton by William Marshall (see Figure 1), beneath which Milton, who considered the engraving unflattering, placed a witty Greek epigram ridiculing it in a language neither Marshall nor Moseley under- stood. Unlike most contemporary poets, Milton neither wrote a preface, solicited commendatory poems, nor acknowledged a patron. He organized his volume more or less chronologically, thus displaying his poetic development, but also carefully grouped together poems of similar themes and genres. With the Latin tag from Virgil’s Eclogues on the title page (“Baccare frontem / Cingite, ne vati noceat mala lingua futuro” – “Bind my forehead with foxglove, lest evil tongues harm the future Bard”), he promises future poems on even greater themes. In the Latin ode sent with a replacement copy of the volume to John Rouse, librar- ian of the Bodleian Library at Oxford, Milton describes the 1645 volume as a “twin book, rejoicing in a single cover, but with a double title page.” The first section of the volume presents his vernacular poems (mostly in English, but also including a mini-sonnet sequence in Italian), and concludes with A MASK Presented At LUDLOW- Castle.
  • 1 Pp. 1-29 [The Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh]

    1 Pp. 1-29 [The Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh]

    1 pp. 1-29 [The Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh]: After that Sir Walter Raleighe was broughte to the barr, he satt downe vpon a stoole within the place made of purpose for the prisoners to be in ... wente backe with the Sheriffe to prison, with admirable erection, yett in such sorte as a Condempned man should doe. Account of the trial of Sir Walter Raleigh in 1603, based on the eye- witness account attributed to Sir Thomas Overbury (1581-1613), and later published as The Arraignment and Conviction of Sir Walter Raleigh (London, 1648) (Wing A3744, Thomason Tracts E. 435 (19)); see also State Trials i, col. 1-38. 2 Letters of Sir Walter Raleigh. (For other transcripts of letters from him, see Castell Gorfod MS 1, ff. 7 v-24, and Carreg-lwyd Deeds and Documents i, 1003, ii, 346). pp. 31-2 Transcript of letter, [21 January 1603/4] from Sir Walter Raleigh to James I of England, written after sentence of death: The life which I had moste mightie Prince, the lawe hath taken from me ... and shall willinglie and patientlie sufferr whatsoever it shall please your Majestie to laye vpon me. Printed in State Trials i, col. 38-9, see also IELM i, pt. 2, p. 372 (x). pp. 33-4 Transcript of letter, [?early 1610s] from Sir Walter Raleigh to Queen Anne, consort of James I: The same blessinges which God doth continue to your Majestie will I hope putt your Majestie in mynde of your Charitie towardes others ... from whose reverence and service (noe power but that of God by death) shall ever seperate me, but that I will rest / your moste humble vassall.
  • From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921)

    From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921)

    Greenwood - Ben Jonson and Shakespeare 61 From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921) Sir George Greenwood HE sheet anchor of the traditional belief with regard to the authorship of t he plays and poems of Shakespeare is undoubtedly Ben Jonson. It is to the Jonsonian utterances that the apostles of the Stratfordian faith always makeT their appeal. That faith we are told is based on the “irrefragable rock” of Ben Jonson’s testimony. Well, it was not so very long ago that we used to be told that the truth of a universal deluge and the preservation of mankind and animals of every kind and species, in Noah’s Ark, was established on the “impregnable rock” of Holy Scripture, and yet to-day we find even high Church digni taries—with whom Mr. J. M. Robertson would certainly be in entire agreement here—disavowing any belief in this interesting mythological tradition. Is it not, then, possible that the Jonsonian testi mony may prove no more “irrefragable” or “impregnable” than that of those old chronicles, which age-long tradition has ascribed to the authorship of “Moses”? As a distinguished writer, well-known both in the political and the literary world, has written to me, the difficulties in the way of the orthodox “Shakespearian” belief seem to be insuperable. Are the Jonsonian utterances of such weight as to outweigh them all? I reply, put Jonson in one scale and all the difficulties and improbabilities — if not impossibilities — of the “Stratfordian” hypothesis in the other, and old Ben will kick the beam. Now let us briefly consider this Jonsonian testimony.
  • The Passionate Shepherd to His Love the Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd

    The Passionate Shepherd to His Love the Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd

    Pastoral Poems and Sonnets The Passionate Shepherd to His Love RL 4 Determine the meaning Poem by Christopher Marlowe of words and phrases as they are used in the text; analyze the The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone. Poem by Sir Walter Raleigh VIDEO TRAILER KEYWORD: HML12-312A Meet the Authors Christopher Christopher Marlowe was the first great in verse, including Raleigh’s “The Marlowe English playwright. In his brief career, Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd.” The two 1564–1593 he transformed theater by showing the poems present sharply contrasting views potential power and beauty of blank verse on love. dialogue. Freethinker . and Criminal? Marlowe Rise to Fame The son of a poor was a freethinker who questioned shoemaker, Marlowe attended Cambridge established authority and religious University on a scholarship. By age 23, teaching, which gained him enemies in he was the best-known playwright in Elizabethan England. He was accused of England. His most famous play, Dr. being an atheist, a spy, a counterfeiter, Faustus, is about a scholar who sells his a traitor, and a murderer. Although soul to the devil in return for knowledge, he spent time in prison, he was never power, and pleasure. Marlowe also convicted of any crime. He died from a distinguished himself as a poet; his poem stab wound in a tavern brawl at age 29. “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” Some biographers speculate that he was was so popular that it inspired responses murdered for political reasons. Sir Walter Like his friend Christopher Marlowe, Sir Losing It All When the queen found Raleigh Walter Raleigh met a violent end.
  • Poetry of Witness

    Poetry of Witness

    POETRY OF WITNESS The Tradition in English, 1^,00—2001 EDITED BY Carolyn Forche AND Duncan Wu W. W. NORTON & COMPANY NEW YORK • LONDON Contents Introduction by Duncan Wu i Reading the Living Archives: The Witness of Literary Art by Carolyn Forche 17 A Note on Texts 27 Acknowledgments 29 I • THE ACE OF TYRANNY 31 St. Thomas More (1478-1535) 34 Lewis the Lost Lover 35 Davy the Dicer 35 Sir Thomas Wyatt (c. 1503-1542) 36 Sometime I fled the fire that me brent 37 Who list his wealth and ease retain 37 In court to serve, decked with fresh array 38 The pillar perished is whereto I leant 39 The flaming sighs that boil within my breast 40 Sighs are my food, drink are my tears 41 Thomas Seymour, Baron Seymour of Sudeley (b. in or before 1509, d. 1549) 41 Forgetting God 42 John Harington (c. 1517-1582) 43 A Sonnet Written Upon My Lord Admiral Seymour 43 viii • Contents Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey (1516/1517-1547) 44 So cruel a prison how could betide, alas 45 Hi' Assyrians' King, in peace with foul desire 47 Psalm 55 48 The storms are passed, these clouds are overblown 49 Anne Askew (c. 1521-1546) 5o Ballad Written in Newgate 5i Elizabeth I (1533-1603) 53 Writ With Charcoal on a Shutter at Woodstock 54 Written With a Diamond on a Window at Woodstock 54 Sir Edmund Spenser (1552-1599) 55 The Faerie Queene Book 5, Canto 12 (extract) 56 Sir Walter Ralegh (1554-1618) 64 My body in the walls captived 65 The End of the Books of the Ocean's Love to Cynthia, and the Beginning of the 22nd Book, Entreating of Sorrow 66 What Is Our Life? 67 Even such is time, which takes in trust 67 Chidiock Tichborne (1558-1586) 68 My prime of youth is but a frost of cares 69 Sir John Harington (bap.
  • Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe

    Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe

    UNTIMELY DEATHS IN RENAISSANCE DRAMA UNTIMELY DEATHS IN RENAISSANCE DRAMA: SHAKESPEARE, MIDDLETON, MARLOWE By ANDREW GRIFFIN, M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University ©Copyright by Andrew Griffin, July 2008 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2008) McMaster University (English) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Untimely Deaths in Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe AUTHOR: Andrew Griffin, M.A. (McMaster University), B.A. (Queen's University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Helen Ostovich NUMBER OF PAGES: vi+ 242 ii Abstract In this dissertation, I read several early modem plays - Shakespeare's Richard II, Middleton's A Chaste Maid in Cheapside, and Marlowe's Dido, Queene ofCarthage ­ alongside a variety of early modem historiographical works. I pair drama and historiography in order to negotiate the question of early modem untimely deaths. Rather than determining once and for all what it meant to die an untimely death in early modem England, I argue here that one answer to this question requires an understanding of the imagined relationship between individuals and the broader unfolding of history by which they were imagined to be shaped, which they were imagined to shape, or from which they imagined to be alienated. I assume here that drama-particularly historically-minded drama - is an ideal object to consider when approaching such vexed questions, and I also assume that the problematic of untimely deaths provides a framework in which to ask about the historico-culturally specific relationships that were imagined to obtain between subjects and history. While it is critically commonplace to assert that early modem drama often stages the so-called "modem" subject, I argue here that early modem visions of the subject are often closely linked to visions of that subject's place in the world, particularly in the world that is recorded by historiographers as a world within and of history.
  • Sir Walter Ralegh and the Cult of Elizabeth I

    Sir Walter Ralegh and the Cult of Elizabeth I

    Proceedings of the HUSSE10 Conference, 27–29 January 2011 Literature & Culture Volume HUSSE10–LitCult Edited by KINGA FÖLDVÁRY , ZSOLT ALMÁSI AND VERONIKA SCHANDL Hungarian Society for the Study of English Debrecen 2011 TRIAL MODE − Click here for more information Reviewers Zsolt ALMÁSI Kinga FÖLDVÁRY Veronika SCHANDL © Authors, 2011 © Magyar Anglisztikai Társaság / Hungarian Society for the Study of English, 2011 ISBN 978-963-08-2793-5 TRIAL MODE − Click here for more information Contents CONTENTS Preface …………………………………………………………………………............. ix Kinga Földváry Celebration Prof. Donald Morse – A Founding Father of the Fulbright Commission in Hungary..... 2 Huba Brückner Medieval and Early Modern Literature and Culture Early Irish Penitentials…………………………………………………………............. 12 Katalin Czottner “In Wele and Wo” – Trothplights of Friends in Medieval English Literature …............ 17 Zsuzsanna Simonkay Petrarchan Love or Politics? – Sir Walter Ralegh and the Cult of Elizabeth I................. 25 Erzsébet Stróbl Self and Reflection – Studies in Poetry The Reader’s Pilgrimage – Narration and Textual Levels in Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage ............................................................................................................... 38 Júlia Bácskai-Atkári Representing the Trauma of Parting: Mourning Emerson’s “Hyacinthine Boy”............. 46 Gyula Somogyi Tricks of the Trade: Emily Dickinson on Writing Poetry................................................ 53 Judit Kónyi “Suicides have a special language”—Suicide
  • Of Sir Walter Ralegh 1940 C

    Of Sir Walter Ralegh 1940 C

    Experience as reflected in the poetry of Sir Walter Raleigh Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Vickers, Martha Huxtable, 1915- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 21:47:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553541 EXPERIENCE AS REFLECTED IN THE POETRY OF SIR WALTER RALEGH by Martha Huxtable Vickers A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Department of English In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1940 Approved: C. % * ____ H 1 V ^ * Major Professor Date %7 Crtl. 2— TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 I. THE COURTIER, AN AMBITIOUS POET............... 1 II. THE LOVER, A CONVENTIONAL POET............... 30 III. THE TRANSITION............................... 46 IV. THE PRISONER, A SERIOUS "OFT................. 63 CONCLUSION........................................... 82 ? BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................... 83 13U73li IHTRODUGTIOH The greatest Influenee shaping Ralegh’s poetry was his experience. The literary significance of Ralegh's poetry lies in his representation of the change from Renaissance love poetry to Jacobean metaphysical poetry* My purpose in making a study of Ralegh as a poet is to reveal the circum­ stances which caused the change in M s poems. This thesis purposes to show that Ralegh* s experience# Influenced the character of his poems. While a favorite in Elizabeth’s court, his struggle for favor induced him to use poetry for a self-seeking end.
  • Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: the Survival of the London Theatre Community

    Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: the Survival of the London Theatre Community

    Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: The Survival of the London Theatre Community By Mary Alex Staude Honors Thesis Department of English and Comparative Literature University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2018 Approved: (Signature of Advisor) Acknowledgements I would like to thank Reid Barbour for his support, guidance, and advice throughout this process. Without his help, this project would not be what it is today. Thanks also to Laura Pates, Adam Maxfield, Alex LaGrand, Aubrey Snowden, Paul Smith, and Playmakers Repertory Company. Also to Diane Naylor at Chatsworth Settlement Trustees. Much love to friends and family for encouraging my excitement about this project. Particular thanks to Nell Ovitt for her gracious enthusiasm, and to Hannah Dent for her unyielding support. I am grateful for the community around me and for the communities that came before my time. Preface Mary Alex Staude worked on ​Twelfth Night​ 2017 with Alex LaGrand who worked on ​King Lear​ 2016 with Zack Powell who worked on ​Henry IV Part II ​2015 with John Ahlin who worked on ​Macbeth​ 2000 with Jerry Hands who worked on ​Much Ado About Nothing​ 1984 with Derek Jacobi who worked on ​Othello ​1964 with Laurence Olivier who worked on ​Romeo and Juliet​ 1935 with Edith Evans who worked on ​The Merry Wives of Windsor​ 1918 with Ellen Terry who worked on ​The Winter’s Tale ​1856 with Charles Kean who worked on ​Richard III 1776 with David Garrick who worked on ​Hamlet ​1747 with Charles Macklin who worked on Henry IV​ 1738 with Colley Cibber who worked on​ Julius Caesar​ 1707 with Thomas Betterton who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1661 with William Davenant who worked on ​Henry VIII​ 1637 with John Lowin who worked on ​Henry VIII ​1613 with John Heminges who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1603 with William Shakespeare.
  • The King's Men's Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews

    The King's Men's Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews

    1 The King’s Men’s Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin My paper will focus on the immediately post-Shakespearean seventeenth century: the King’s Men’s repertory in the wake of Shakespeare’s retirement, and specifically the plays written by Fletcher (and his co-authors) while he was principal dramatist for the King’s Men. I will argue that the company was the first group to make Shakespeare “Shakespeare” and to imagine themselves in a specifically post-Shakespearean moment, for even after Shakespeare’s death the company self-consciously cultivated a Shakespearean repertory style in order to provide continuity with their earlier drama. In this way, Shakespeare became a guiding ideal for the company as much as a former sharer, his descendants’ works less derivative and more working within a specific house style. Particularly, I plan to examine two moments in Fletcher’s career. The first is the period 1620-22, in which Fletcher wrote a cluster of plays that were heavily influenced by The Tempest. I will argue that these plays served as a form of advance marketing for the First Folio, and constructed a particular image of “Shakespeare” that a reader opening to the first page of the Folio would immediately recognize. The second moment concerns the group of plays written by Fletcher (and Beaumont) for the King’s Men from Philaster on. The influence of Beaumont and Fletcher’s tragicomedy on Shakespeare has long been acknowledged, but I will argue that as Fletcher began to write for the King’s Men before, during, and after Shakespeare’s quasi-retirement in 1610, he cultivated a Shakespearean style, especially intrigued by the elder playwright’s focus on active heroines.
  • Article Reference

    Article Reference

    Article For the Stage and the Page ERNE, Lukas Christian Abstract Argues that Shakespeare wrote his plays not only for the theatrical stage but also for the printed page. Reference ERNE, Lukas Christian. For the Stage and the Page. Around the Globe, 2004, vol. 26, p. 36-37 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:14904 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 36 PLATFORM STAGE PLATFORM STAGE 37 Shakespeare was a man of the theatre; a playwright, not a literary dramatist. He didn't write his plays to be read. Or did he? Lukas Erna questions the truth of a mouldy old tale. It is one of the more enduring myths in thinking about for the London stage, shorter versions of the same plays Shakespeare that he was indifferent to his literary reputation, need to be explained away as something different to the publication of his plays, and to their afterlife. In the and inferior. As a result of these mutually reinforcing early 18th century, Alexander Pope wrote that Shakespeare assumptions, the view of Shakespeare as indifferent `grew Immortal in his own despight', and many variations to his literary reputation and his works' survival could upon this theme have followed since. Like all myths, the remain safely in place. present one has served an important purpose, allowing us A close look, however, will reveal that none of the four to see Shakespeare, the natural genius, 'warbling his native pillars that have supported this traditional construction of woodnotes wild', in opposition to the bookish Ben Jonson.