Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe UNTIMELY DEATHS IN RENAISSANCE DRAMA UNTIMELY DEATHS IN RENAISSANCE DRAMA: SHAKESPEARE, MIDDLETON, MARLOWE By ANDREW GRIFFIN, M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University ©Copyright by Andrew Griffin, July 2008 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2008) McMaster University (English) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Untimely Deaths in Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe AUTHOR: Andrew Griffin, M.A. (McMaster University), B.A. (Queen's University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Helen Ostovich NUMBER OF PAGES: vi+ 242 ii Abstract In this dissertation, I read several early modem plays - Shakespeare's Richard II, Middleton's A Chaste Maid in Cheapside, and Marlowe's Dido, Queene ofCarthage ­ alongside a variety of early modem historiographical works. I pair drama and historiography in order to negotiate the question of early modem untimely deaths. Rather than determining once and for all what it meant to die an untimely death in early modem England, I argue here that one answer to this question requires an understanding of the imagined relationship between individuals and the broader unfolding of history by which they were imagined to be shaped, which they were imagined to shape, or from which they imagined to be alienated. I assume here that drama-particularly historically-minded drama - is an ideal object to consider when approaching such vexed questions, and I also assume that the problematic of untimely deaths provides a framework in which to ask about the historico-culturally specific relationships that were imagined to obtain between subjects and history. While it is critically commonplace to assert that early modem drama often stages the so-called "modem" subject, I argue here that early modem visions of the subject are often closely linked to visions of that subject's place in the world, particularly in the world that is recorded by historiographers as a world within and of history. I argue that one can begin to make sense of deaths in terms of their timeliness or untimeliness only by recognizing historically specific senses of the narrativized subject and the imagined relationship between that subject and history. iii For Bob and Elaine Griffin, and for Sylvia Bowerbank. iv Acknowledgements Helen Ostovich has been an ideal mentor, supervisor, colleague, and friend since 2001, when I first met her in a classroom while studying for my MA. She has often corrected my gaffes, cheered my successes, challenged me to think clearly, and provided me with all varieties of support. She has provided me with a place to live and write in Toronto when she's away, she has introduced me to friends and ideas, she has insisted on an editor's precision, she has insisted on the Oxford comma, she has employed me, and she has taught me - by laughing easily - how to enjoy early modem drama. This project and I would both be far poorer if not for her efforts and care. Melinda Gough has been a generous interlocutor and a good friend over the past five years. Her seriousness and her professionalism have encouraged me to attempt seriousness and professionalism. I am inspired by the pleasure she takes in the work of criticism, and I am excited by the excitement that she unapologetically exhibits when discussing literature and ideas. She has been an excellent role model. Working with her while writing this dissertation has been both rewarding and fun. Mary Silcox has often put me at ease by showing confidence in both me and this project from the outset. In the classroom, she taught me how to read more carefully than I would have, and she demonstrated - again and again - that good scholars can have good senses of humour. On occasion, she gave me more than enough rope to hang myself, which is an excellent pedagogical strategy. Steph Morley, Gary Kuchar, Graham Roebuck, Sylvia Bowerbank, Carolyn Casey, Jed Rasula, and David Clark have generously contributed significant intellectual and personal resources to this project and to others. They have talked me through problems, provided me with new problems, fed me, housed me on research trips, and pointed me in new directions. This dissertation and I are much obliged. My time at McMaster has included many valuable conversations and great weekends: Suzanne, Shawna, Evan, Jaime, Tim, Emily, Kaley, Brandi Lee, Ben, Justin, and the members of Discipline and Punishment, the departmental softball team, are owed many thanks. I also owe thanks to old friends, Mark, Phil, Matt, Ben, Al, Andrew, Rich, and Marc, and especially Liz, who has been with me for the long haul. As anyone who knows her will recognize, June Cheng deserves more than thanks. She has been a help and a riot. This project was funded primarily by a Canadian Graduate Scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Other funding for this project came from an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and from a McMaster University Graduate Scholarship and from the Marion Northcott Schweitzer Travel Bursary. v Table of Contents Untimely Deaths in Renaissance Drama 1 On a Regal Lifespan: Richard II 34 Middleton and the Urban Untimely 88 Tragedy and Epic in Marlowe's Dido, Queene ofCarthage 154 Horatio's Infelicity 214 vi Introduction Untimely Deaths in Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Middleton, Marlowe In the three stanzas that Chidiock Tichbome included in a letter to his wife on 19 September 1586 - the day before he was executed for participating in the Babington Plot - he describes the unusualness of his position: about 28 years old, he is a young man, but he is also preparing for his death. My prime of youth is but a frost of cares, My feast of joy is but a dish of pain, My crop of com is but a field of tares, And all my good is but vain hope of gain. The day is past, and yet I saw no sun, And now I live, and now my life is done. My tale was heard and yet it was not told, My fruit is fallen and yet my leaves are green; My youth is spent and yet I am not old, I saw the world and yet I was not seen. My thread is cut and yet it is not spun, And now I live, and now my life is done. I sought my death and found it in my womb, I looked for life and saw it was a shade; I trod the earth and knew it was my tomb, And now I die, and now I was but made. My glass is full, and now my glass is run, And now I live, and now my life is done. I quote the entirety of the poem now known as "Tichbome's Elegy" because its dreary repetition and its copia of paradoxes speak to the sense of bafflement that characterizes thinking on untimely deaths. Even though Tichbome will be disemboweled alive the day after writing this poem - an execution so horrific that Queen Elizabeth I will insist it not be repeated on the remaining conspirators -he is more concerned here with his death's Ph. D. Thesis: A. Griffin McMaster'University, Department of English and Cultural Studies 2 nonsensicalness than he is with the fact of his death and its attendant agonies. Tichborne is stunned specifically because he is dying and because he is simultaneously too young to die. This preoccupation with the untimeliness of death rather than the state of his soul is particularly striking when one considers that his piety led him to the situation in which he finds himself. At the end of his life, this dedicated Catholic writes a poem that fails to mention God or Church. Rather than contemplating repentance or God or mortality in general, Tichborne here is primarily concerned with the severe disjuncture between the stories that he has imagined proleptically about his life and the current situation in which he finds himself. To distil Tichborne's paradoxes, he presumes that there is something called "his life" which should continue, even though "his life" is coming to an end. Just as the poem frustratingly refuses to develop - each perfectly balanced line repeats the structure and tropes from the previous line, each stanza repeats the structure of the stanza before it - Tichborne imagines his life in terms of a developmental failure: both his poem and his life end, but neither reaches a satisfying conclusion. The close relationship between the poem's form and its content is perhaps the point of this work because Tichborne imagines his life here in literary, or at least narrative, terms. Though it is a lyric, the poem gestures towards narrative by invoking images of organic development in the form of fruit, trees, and crops, but the lyric qua lyric refuses to develop this narrative potential. In lieu of a story is a slew of paradoxes that describe an organic promise nipped in the bud before it blossoms. 1 1 This relationship between confused seasons and untimely deaths is a common topos in the period. See, for instance, Don Andrea in Kyd's The Spanish Tragedy as he complains that "in the harvest of my summer joys I Death's winter nipp 'd the blossoms of my bliss" ( 1.1.12-13 ). On the "unseasonable destruction of Ph. D. Thesis: A. Griffin McMaster University, Department of English and Cultural Studies 3 Tichbome juxtaposes this vision of biological unfolding, however, with other images that complicate any vision of his death as a straightforwardly biological anomaly. The poem's organic imagery is set against his allusion to the Fates who have cut his un­ spun thread, and here an ambiguously classical sense of fate becomes apparent.
Recommended publications
  • MAY 2020 NEW TITLES FICTION WOLF HALL BRING up the BODIES Beautiful Hilary Mantel New Hilary Mantel
    MAY 2020 NEW TITLES FICTION WOLF HALL BRING UP THE BODIES Beautiful Hilary Mantel New Hilary Mantel Winner of the Man Booker Prize Jackets! Winner of the Man Booker Prize 2012 Shortlisted for the Orange Prize Winner of the 2012 Costa Book of the Year Shortlisted for the Costa Novel Award Shortlisted for the 2013 Women’s Prize for Fiction `Dizzyingly, dazzlingly good' Daily Mail ‘Simply exceptional…I envy anyone who hasn’t yet read it’ Daily Mail ‘Our most brilliant English writer’ Guardian ‘A gripping story of tumbling fury and terror’ Independent England, the 1520s. Henry VIII is on the throne, but has no on Sunday heir. Cardinal Wolsey is his chief advisor, charged with securing the divorce the pope refuses to grant. Into this With this historic win for Bring Up the Bodies, Hilary Mantel atmosphere of distrust and need comes Thomas Cromwell, becomes the first British author and the first woman to be first as Wolsey's clerk, and later his successor. awarded two Man Booker Prizes. Cromwell is a wholly original man: the son of a brutal By 1535 Thomas Cromwell is Chief Minister to Henry VIII, his blacksmith, a political genius, a briber, a charmer, a bully, a fortunes having risen with those of Anne Boleyn, the king’s man with a delicate and deadly expertise in manipulating new wife. But Anne has failed to give the king an heir, and people and events. Ruthless in pursuit of his own interests, he Cromwell watches as Henry falls for plain Jane Seymour. is as ambitious in his wider politics as he is for himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Stuart and Elizabeth 1 Notes for a CE Source Question Introduction
    Mary Stuart and Elizabeth 1 Notes for a CE Source Question Introduction Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1587) Mary was the daughter of James V of Scotland and Mary of Guise. She became Queen of Scotland when she was six days old after her father died at the Battle of Solway Moss. A marriage was arranged between Mary and Edward, only son of Henry VIII but was broken when the Scots decided they preferred an alliance with France. Mary spent a happy childhood in France and in 1558 married Francis, heir to the French throne. They became king and queen of France in 1559. Francis died in 1560 of an ear infection and Mary returned to Scotland a widow in 1561. During Mary's absence, Scotland had become a Protestant country. The Protestants did not want Mary, a Catholic and their official queen, to have any influence. In 1565 Mary married her cousin and heir to the English throne, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley. The marriage was not a happy one. Darnley was jealous of Mary's close friendship with her secretary, David Rizzio and in March 1566 had him murdered in front of Mary who was six months pregnant with the future James VI and I. Darnley made many enemies among the Scottish nobles and in 1567 his house was blown up. Darnley's body was found outside in the garden, he had been strangled. Three months later Mary married the chief suspect in Darnley’s murder, the Earl of Bothwell. The people of Scotland were outraged and turned against her.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry of Witness
    POETRY OF WITNESS The Tradition in English, 1^,00—2001 EDITED BY Carolyn Forche AND Duncan Wu W. W. NORTON & COMPANY NEW YORK • LONDON Contents Introduction by Duncan Wu i Reading the Living Archives: The Witness of Literary Art by Carolyn Forche 17 A Note on Texts 27 Acknowledgments 29 I • THE ACE OF TYRANNY 31 St. Thomas More (1478-1535) 34 Lewis the Lost Lover 35 Davy the Dicer 35 Sir Thomas Wyatt (c. 1503-1542) 36 Sometime I fled the fire that me brent 37 Who list his wealth and ease retain 37 In court to serve, decked with fresh array 38 The pillar perished is whereto I leant 39 The flaming sighs that boil within my breast 40 Sighs are my food, drink are my tears 41 Thomas Seymour, Baron Seymour of Sudeley (b. in or before 1509, d. 1549) 41 Forgetting God 42 John Harington (c. 1517-1582) 43 A Sonnet Written Upon My Lord Admiral Seymour 43 viii • Contents Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey (1516/1517-1547) 44 So cruel a prison how could betide, alas 45 Hi' Assyrians' King, in peace with foul desire 47 Psalm 55 48 The storms are passed, these clouds are overblown 49 Anne Askew (c. 1521-1546) 5o Ballad Written in Newgate 5i Elizabeth I (1533-1603) 53 Writ With Charcoal on a Shutter at Woodstock 54 Written With a Diamond on a Window at Woodstock 54 Sir Edmund Spenser (1552-1599) 55 The Faerie Queene Book 5, Canto 12 (extract) 56 Sir Walter Ralegh (1554-1618) 64 My body in the walls captived 65 The End of the Books of the Ocean's Love to Cynthia, and the Beginning of the 22nd Book, Entreating of Sorrow 66 What Is Our Life? 67 Even such is time, which takes in trust 67 Chidiock Tichborne (1558-1586) 68 My prime of youth is but a frost of cares 69 Sir John Harington (bap.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Elizabethan England, 1558-88 REVISION SHEET Key Topic 1
    Early Elizabethan England, 1558-88 REVISION SHEET Key topic 1: Queen, government and religion, 1558-69 Society Government Hierarchy in countryside Hierarchy in towns Court – Noblemen who advised 1. Nobility 1. Merchants the queen 2. Gentry 2. Professionals Parliament – Houses of Lords 3. Yeomen 3. Business owners and Commons. Advised 4. Tenant farmers 4. Skilled craftsmen Elizabeth’s government 5. Landless and working poor 5. Unskilled workers Privy Council – Nobles who 6. Homeless and beggars 6. Unemployed helped govern the country Elizabeth’s problems when she became queen in 1558: She was young and inexperienced. She was Protestant so not supported by English Catholics. Many people (especially Catholics) thought she was illegitimate and had no right to the throne. She was unmarried. Financial weaknesses – The Crown (government) was £300,000 in debt. Mary I had sold off Crown lands (making it hard for Elizabeth to raise money) and borrowed from foreign countries (who charged high interest rates). Challenges from abroad – France, Spain and Scotland were all Catholic countries and believed Mary, Queen of Scots had a stronger claim to the throne of England than Elizabeth. France and Scotland were old allies. Elizabeth’s character – She was very well educated, confident and charismatic. She believed in her divine right to rule. She had an excellent understanding of politics. She was strong willed and stubborn. Religious Divisions in 1558 Catholic Protestant Puritan Pope is head of the church No pope Very strict Protestants Priests can forgive sins Only God can forgive sins (shared many beliefs but Bread and wine become the body and Bread and wine represent the body and more extreme, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Plots Early Life 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600
    Elizabethan England: Part 1 – Elizabeth’s Court and Parliament Family History Who had power in Elizabethan England? Elizabeth’s Court Marriage The Virgin Queen Why did Parliament pressure Elizabeth to marry? Reasons Elizabeth chose Group Responsibilities No. of people: not to marry: Parliament Groups of people in the Royal What did Elizabeth do in response by 1566? Who was Elizabeth’s father and Court: mother? What happened to Peter Wentworth? Council Privy What happened to Elizabeth’s William Cecil mother? Key details: Elizabeth’s Suitors Lieutenants Robert Dudley Francis Duke of Anjou King Philip II of Spain Who was Elizabeth’s brother? Lord (Earl of Leicester) Name: Key details: Key details: Key details: Religion: Francis Walsingham: Key details: Who was Elizabeth’s sister? Justices of Name: Peace Nickname: Religion: Early Life 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 Childhood 1569 1571 1583 1601 Preparation for life in the Royal The Northern Rebellion The Ridolfi Plot The Throckmorton Plot Essex’s Rebellion Court: Key conspirators: Key conspirators: Key conspirators: Key people: Date of coronation: The plan: The plan: The plan: What happened? Age: Key issues faced by Elizabeth: Key events: Key events: Key events: What did Elizabeth show in her response to Essex? The Catholic Plots Elizabethan England: Part 2 – Life in Elizabethan Times Elizabethan Society God The Elizabethan Theatre The Age of Discovery Key people and groups: New Companies: New Technology: What was the ‘Great Chain of Being’? Key details: Explorers and Privateers Francis Drake John Hawkins Walter Raleigh Peasants Position Income Details Nobility Reasons for opposition to the theatre: Gentry 1577‐1580 1585 1596 1599 Drake Raleigh colonises ‘Virginia’ in Raleigh attacks The Globe Circumnavigation North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Elizabethan England Revision Booklet NAME:______
    Early Elizabethan England Revision Booklet NAME:____________ Contents Tick when complete Topic 1 • How did Elizabeth’s Early Life affect her later decisions? p 2-3 What were the • What were the threats to Elizabeth’s succession? P 3-5 early threats to • How did Elizabeth govern? P6 Elizabeth’s reign? • What was the Religious Settlement? 7-10 • How serious was the Puritan Challenge? P 11-12 • Why was Mary Queen of Scots a Threat 1858-1868? p 12-13 • Knowledge and Exam Question Checklist p 14 Topic 2 • What were the causes of the Revolt of the Northern Earls p15-16 What were the Catholic • Which Plot was the greatest threat to Elizabeth? P 17-19 Plots that threatened • Why was Mary Queen of Scots executed in 1587? P20-21 Elizabeth? Why did England go to War with • Why did England go to war with Spain in 1585? p22-24 Spain in 1585? Why was • Why was the Spanish Armada defeated in 1588? p24-26 the Armada defeated in • Knowledge and Exam Question Checklist p 27 1588? Topic 3 • Why did poverty increase in Elizabethan England? p28-29 Elizabethan Society in • Why were Elizabethans so scared of Vagabonds? p30-33 the Age of exploration • Why did Drake and Raleigh go on voyages around the world and what did they discover? p33-36 • Why did the Virginia colonies fail? p37-40 • Was there a Golden Age for all Elizabethans? P41-43 • Knowledge and Exam Question Checklist p 44 Quizzes • Topic 1 p 45-46 • Topic 2 p 47-48 • Topic 3 p 49-50 Learning Ladder • 16 mark p 51 • 12 mark p 52 • 4 mark p 53 1 Topic 1 pages 2-14 How did Elizabeth’s Early Life affect her later decisions? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Examination of Mary Queen of Scots
    Some matters appertaining to the accusation, trial, and execution of Mary Queen of Scots Being letters and records of that perilous time with Clarification and Notes by ye humble Editrix Maggie Pierce Secara Selected, Edited, Mapped, and Adapted for Modern Readers from History of the Life of Mary Queen of Scots, 1681 The Contents The Examination of Mary Queen of Scots .......................................................................................... 4 Wednesday, 12 October ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Thursday, 13 October ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Friday, 14 October ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Queen Elizabeth’s Letter directed to Sir Amyas Paulet, Knight, keeper of the Queen of Scots, at the castle of Fotheringay ........................................................................................................................ 14 The Scottish Queen’s Letter to Anthony Babington ............................................................................ 15 Anthony Babington a Letter written by him to the Scottish Queen ...................................................... 16 The answer of the Scottish Queen to a Letter written by Anthony Babington, the Traitor, as followeth
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Threat to Elizabeth I? Elizabeth I’S Life Was Constantly in Danger
    What Was the Threat to Elizabeth I? Elizabeth I’s life was constantly in danger. Without an heir, the throne could easily be snatched by an assassin’s knife and taken by Elizabeth’s Catholic cousin Mary Queen of Scots. There were hundreds of attempts and plots on Elizabeth’s life, below are just some of them. Can you determine the key characteristics of these threats and if there are any common themes? Somerville John Somerville was a Catholic from Warwickshire. He had been stirred up Barge Incident by anti-Elizabeth propaganda created and distributed by a growing Jesuit Elizabeth was nearly assassinated whilst travelling on a barge on the river (Catholic) presence in the country. Thames in London in 1571. Somerville wanted to “see her head on a pole, for she was a serpent and a One of her guards was shot with the arrow and she promised him he would viper” and boasted of his intent publicly. want for nothing as he had saved her life. Somerville was tracked down, arrested and sentenced to death in 1583. Northern Uprising Ridolfi Plot This was an unsuccessful uprising in 1569 of many Catholic Lords from the Roberto Ridolfi was a Florentine banker and an agent of the Pope’s. He acted as North of England to rise up against Queen Elizabeth with Mary Queen of Scots. a go-between for Spain and the Duke of Norfolk. The Duke of Norfolk aimed to marry Mary Queen of Scots, assassinate Queen Elizabeth and put Mary on the The uprising was quashed by Elizabeth’s many troops, but some leaders escaped throne as Catholic Queen.
    [Show full text]
  • Printing Discovered and Intercepted Letters in England, 1571–1600
    Propaganda, Patriotism, and News: Printing Discovered and Intercepted Letters In England, 1571–1600 GARY SCHNEIDER University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Abstract: In this article I propose that the relatively few intercepted and discovered letters printed during the reign of Elizabeth I fall chiefly into three categories: they were published as propaganda, as patriotic statement, and as news reportage. Although Elizabeth and her ministers published intercepted and discovered letters on a strictly ad hoc and contingent basis, the pamphlets and books in which these letters appear, along with associated ideo- logical and polemical material, reveals determined uses of intercepted and discovered let- ters in print. Catholics likewise printed intercepted letters as propaganda to confront Eliz- abeth’s anti-Catholic policies through their own propaganda apparatus on the continent. Intercepted letters were also printed less frequently to encourage religious and state patri- otism, while other intercepted letters were printed solely as new reportage with no overt ideological intent. Because intercepted and discovered letters, as bearers of secret infor- mation, were understood to reveal sincere intention and genuine motivation, all of the pub- lications assessed here demonstrate that such letters not only could be used as effective tools to shape cultural perceptions, but could also be cast as persuasive written testimony, as legal proof and as documentary authentication. he years of the English civil wars are the ones usually associated with
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Relations with Spain Lead to War in 1588? What Were Key Issues That Impacted Elizabeth’S Foreign Policy Aims?
    How did relations with Spain lead to war in 1588? What were key issues that impacted Elizabeth’s foreign policy aims? • England was smaller and poorer than Spain & France • There were tensions between Protestants and Catholics at home meaning she had to be careful what she did abroad Reasons for relations to break down between Elizabeth and Philip 1. Commercial Rivalry English merchants began exploring the new world looking for new trading opportunities Spain controlled The Netherlands (Antwerp) and much of the New World To trade in the New World, you needed a licence from Spain. Most English merchants traded without a licence, even attacking Spanish ports and ships 2. Drake 3. Indirect intervention in the Netherlands Following the Spanish Inquisition, they were putting Elizabeth under immense pressure to help the Protestant Dutch rebels. Will she or wont she…. Robert Dudley William Cecil Earl of Leicester Chief Advisor Write these 4 concerns of Elizabeth in rank order of most concerning to least Elizabeth was very reluctant to help the Dutch Protestants in case it started a war with Spain. Instead she hoped to apply some pressure on Spain to allow the Dutch to govern themselves without Spanish interference as had been agreed back in 1548. • Elizabeth allowed Spanish shipping and colonies to come under attack from English privateers, this might drag away troops and resources from the Netherlands • Pursuing friendly relations with France – She offered a promise to marry the Duke of Anjou of France, the French heir • Encourage others (Anjou) to fight the Spanish in the Netherlands giving him £70,000 • Funding (secretly) John Casimir to attack with 6000 troops – she said he ‘volunteered’ Were Elizabeth’s actions so far acceptable? Clever? … 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristocratic Women at the Late Elizabethan Court: Politics, Patronage and Power
    Aristocratic Women at the Late Elizabethan Court: Politics, Patronage and Power Joanne Lee Hocking School of Humanities, Department of History University of Adelaide November 2015 Table of Contents Abstract i Thesis declaration iii Acknowledgments iv List of Abbreviations v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 The Political Context, 1580-1603 28 Chapter 3 The Politics of Female Agency: 54 Anne Dudley, Countess of Warwick Chapter 4 The Politics of Family and Faction: 132 Anne, Lady Bacon and Elizabeth, Lady Russell Chapter 5 The Politics of Favour: the Essex Women 195 Chapter 6 Conclusion 265 Appendices Appendix A – the Russell family 273 Appendix B – the Dudley family 274 Appendix C – the Cooke family 275 Appendix D – the Devereux family 276 Appendix E – Countess of Warwick’s 277 Patronage Network Appendix F –Countess of Warwick’s will 292 Bibliography 305 Abstract This thesis examines the power of aristocratic women in politics and patronage in the final years of the Elizabethan court (1580 to 1603). Substantial archival sources are analysed to evaluate the concepts of female political agency discussed in scholarly literature, including women’s roles in politics, within families, in networks and as part of the court patronage system. A case study methodology is used to examine the lives and careers of specific aristocratic women in three spheres of court politics – the politics of female agency, the politics of family and faction, and the politics of favour. The first case study looks at Elizabeth’s long-serving lady-in-waiting, Anne Dudley, Countess of Warwick, and demonstrates that female political agents harnessed multiple sources of agency to exercise power at court on behalf of dense patronage networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Spying and Surveillance in Shakespeare’s Dramatic Courts Richard Angus Smith A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Department of English The University of Sydney Contents Declaration of originality ii Abstract iii Acknowledgments iv Note on editions used v 1. Introduction: Elizabethan espionage and the behavioural equivocation of Elizabethan spies 1-62 2. Much Ado About Nothing: surveillance and self-deception 63-96 3.
    [Show full text]