DOCSLIB.ORG

Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the Scornful Lady by John Fletcher the Scornful Lady by John Fletcher

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the Scornful Lady by John Fletcher the Scornful Lady by John Fletcher Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Scornful Lady by John Fletcher The Scornful Lady by John Fletcher. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 659205a979b784a4 • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. The Scornful Lady by John Fletcher. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 659205a97c84c41f • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. The Scornful Lady by John Fletcher. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 659205a98c2184e0 • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Wikipedia. This text was copied from Wikipedia on 1 June 2021 at 6:01AM. The Scornful Lady is a Jacobean era stage play, a comedy written by Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, and first published in 1616, the year of Beaumont's death. It was one of the pair's most popular, often revived, and frequently reprinted works. Contents. Performances. The title page of the 1616 first edition states that the play was premiered by the Children of the Queen's Revels; it later passed into the possession of the King's Men, who revived the play in 1624. [1] (The company's clown, John Shank, played the Curate in their 1624 production.) The King's Men acted The Scornful Lady on 19 October 1633, when Sir Henry Herbert, the Master of the Revels, refused to let them perform The Woman's Prize. Prince Charles, the future King Charles II, attended a performance of the play at the Cockpit-in-Court Theatre on Twelfth Night, 6 January 1642. While the theatres were closed during the English Civil War and the Interregnum (1642–60), material was extracted from The Scornful Lady to form a droll called The False Heir and Formal Curate, published by Kirkman in The Wits . The play was revived early in the Restoration and became a standard in the repertory. In his Diary, Samuel Pepys recorded seeing it on 27 November 1660 and on 4 January 1661, both times with male actors in the title role, as was standard up to that time. Then Thomas Killigrew staged the play with women in the female parts; Pepys saw that production on 12 February 1661. Pepys saw the play again on 27 December 1666, 16 September 1667, and 3 June 1668. Charles Hart and Edward Kynaston were among the actors of the day who played in it. [2] The Scornful Lady remained in the repertory until the middle of the 18th century. [3] Some early actresses acquired reputations for their work in the play; Anne Marshall was noted for her portrayal of the title character in the 1660s, while in the next century Mrs. Macklin, the wife of Charles Macklin, was a popular success as the servant Abigail. Authorship. The play was entered into the Stationers' Register on 19 March 1616; both the Register entry and the first edition assign the play to Beaumont and Fletcher. Cyrus Hoy, in his survey of authorship problems in the canon of Fletcher and his collaborators, produced this breakdown in the two writers' contributions: [4] Beaumont — Act I, scene 1; Act II, 2; Act V, 2; Fletcher — Act I, scene 2; Act II, 2 and 3; Act III; Act IV; Act V, scenes 1, 3, and 4. Hoy's schema is in general agreement with the work of earlier researchers. [5] A few early critics suggested the participation of Philip Massinger, though that possibility has generally been rejected due to lack of evidence. Based on references and allusions to contemporary events, scholars generally date the play to the 1613–16 period, though dates as early as 1610 have also been proposed. [6] [7] [8] The Scornful Lady participates in a complex inter-relationship with several other plays of its era, a set of dramas that includes Marston's The Dutch Courtesan, Fletcher and Massinger's The Little French Lawyer, Massinger's The Parliament of Love, and A Cure for a Cuckold by John Webster and William Rowley. [9] All the plays exploit the idea of a woman who wants her beloved to duel with and kill his closest friend. Texts. The play went through multiple editions in the 17th century, leaving it with a complex publication history. [10] The 1616 first edition, published in quarto by the bookseller Miles Partridge, with the printing probably done by Richard Bradock. Q2, 1625, published by Thomas Jones, the printing presumably done by Augustine Matthews. Q3, 1630, issued again by Thomas Jones, printed by Bernard Alsop and Thomas Fawcett. Q4, 1635, published and printed by Augustine Matthews, the printer of Q2. Q5, 1639, issued by Robert Wilson, printing by Marmaduke Parsons. Q6, 1651, published by Humphrey Moseley; the printer was probably William Wilson. Two pirated editions of Moseley's Q6, issued by Francis Kirkman, both with the false date "1651." Q7, 1677, which, in light of the previous piracies, pointedly identifies itself as "The Seventh Edition" on its title page; "As it is now Acted at the Theatre Royal" in Drury Lane. The likely publishers were Thomas Collins and Dorman Newman, acting through the bookseller Simon Neale. Q8, 1691, from Dorman Newman. Subsequent editions followed in the 18th century. Like other already-published Beaumont/Fletcher plays, The Scornful Lady was omitted from the first Beaumont and Fletcher folio of 1647, but was included in the second folio of 1679. Thomas Shadwell borrowed from the Beaumont/Fletcher play for his own The Woman-Captain (1680), [11] which was revived in 1744 as The Prodigal. References. ^ E. K. Chambers, The Elizabethan Stage, 4 Volumes, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1823; Vol. 3, p. 229. ^ Arthur Colby Sprague, Beaumont and Fletcher on the Restoration Stage, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1926; pp. 42-3. ^ Sprague, p. 124. ^ Terence P. Logan and Denzell S. Smith, eds., The Later Jacobean and Caroline Dramatists: A Survey and Bibliography of Recent Studies in English Renaissance Drama, Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska Press, 1978; p. 63. ^ E. H. C. Oliphant, The Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher: An Attempt to Determine Their Respective Shares and the Shares of Others, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1927; p. 210. ^ Chambers, Vol. 3, pp. 229-30. ^ Oliphant, p. 209. ^ Logan and Smith, p. 63. ^ Rupert Brooke, John Webster and the Elizabethan Drama, New York, John Lane, 1916; pp. 261- 74. ^ Fredson Bowers, general editor, The Dramatic Works in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon, Vol. 2., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970. Cyrus Hoy, Textual Introduction, pp. 451-5. ^ Albert Stephens Borgman, Thomas Shadwell: His Life and Comedies, New York, New York University Press, 1928; reprinted New York, Benjamin Blom, 1969; pp. 185-90. External links. 1 Annotation. in Aqua Scripto on 16 Nov 2005 • Link. your copy available here: http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12110 quote:"Kiss till the cow comes home:" II. ii. "There is no other puratory but a woman" III. i. Log in to post an annotation. If you don't have an account, then register here. References. Chart showing the number of references in each month of the diary’s entries. The Works of Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher in Ten Volumes Volume I. By: John Fletcher (1579-1625) The first collected edition of the plays of Beaumont and Fletcher was published in 1647, in folio (12 1/2 ins. x 8 1/8 ins. is the measurement of the copy used for the purpose of collation). The title page runs thus: Comedies and Tragedies. Never printed before, And now published by the Authours Originall Copies. Si quid habent veri Vatum præsagia, vivam.London , Printed for Humphrey Robinson , at the three Pidgeons , and for Humphrey Moseley at the Princes Armes in St Pauls . This collection, which is referred to as the First Folio throughout the present edition, contained all the authors' previously unpublished plays (34) except The Wild Goose Chase , which, at the date of the Folio, was supposed to be lost.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH the AGES an Investigation of the Stage
    f [ THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH THE AGES An investigation of the stage history of Ben Jonson's play by JAMES CUNNINGHAM CARTER B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 196 8 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT. OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1972 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date 27 QclAtt ii ABSTRACT THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH THE AGES An Investigation of the Stage History of Ben Jonson's Play This study was made to trace the stage history of The Alchemist and to see what effect theatrical productions can have in developing critical awareness of Jonson's dramatic skill in this popular play. Therefore an attempt has been made to record all performances by major companies between 1610 and 197 0 with cast lists and other pertinent information about scenery/ stage action and properties. The second part of the thesis provides a detailed analysis of four specific productions considered in light of their prompt books, details of acting and production, and overall critical reception.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton
    C01.qxd 8/18/08 14:44 Page 1 Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton In 1645, Milton published most but not all of the poems he had composed by that date. The publisher Humphrey Moseley had been bringing out volumes of lyric poetry by royalist poets such as Edmund Waller, and it was likely, as he claims in the intro- duction to the volume, that he approached Milton and encouraged him to publish his verse. Moseley also arranged for the engraved portrait of Milton by William Marshall (see Figure 1), beneath which Milton, who considered the engraving unflattering, placed a witty Greek epigram ridiculing it in a language neither Marshall nor Moseley under- stood. Unlike most contemporary poets, Milton neither wrote a preface, solicited commendatory poems, nor acknowledged a patron. He organized his volume more or less chronologically, thus displaying his poetic development, but also carefully grouped together poems of similar themes and genres. With the Latin tag from Virgil’s Eclogues on the title page (“Baccare frontem / Cingite, ne vati noceat mala lingua futuro” – “Bind my forehead with foxglove, lest evil tongues harm the future Bard”), he promises future poems on even greater themes. In the Latin ode sent with a replacement copy of the volume to John Rouse, librar- ian of the Bodleian Library at Oxford, Milton describes the 1645 volume as a “twin book, rejoicing in a single cover, but with a double title page.” The first section of the volume presents his vernacular poems (mostly in English, but also including a mini-sonnet sequence in Italian), and concludes with A MASK Presented At LUDLOW- Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921)
    Greenwood - Ben Jonson and Shakespeare 61 From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921) Sir George Greenwood HE sheet anchor of the traditional belief with regard to the authorship of t he plays and poems of Shakespeare is undoubtedly Ben Jonson. It is to the Jonsonian utterances that the apostles of the Stratfordian faith always makeT their appeal. That faith we are told is based on the “irrefragable rock” of Ben Jonson’s testimony. Well, it was not so very long ago that we used to be told that the truth of a universal deluge and the preservation of mankind and animals of every kind and species, in Noah’s Ark, was established on the “impregnable rock” of Holy Scripture, and yet to-day we find even high Church digni taries—with whom Mr. J. M. Robertson would certainly be in entire agreement here—disavowing any belief in this interesting mythological tradition. Is it not, then, possible that the Jonsonian testi mony may prove no more “irrefragable” or “impregnable” than that of those old chronicles, which age-long tradition has ascribed to the authorship of “Moses”? As a distinguished writer, well-known both in the political and the literary world, has written to me, the difficulties in the way of the orthodox “Shakespearian” belief seem to be insuperable. Are the Jonsonian utterances of such weight as to outweigh them all? I reply, put Jonson in one scale and all the difficulties and improbabilities — if not impossibilities — of the “Stratfordian” hypothesis in the other, and old Ben will kick the beam. Now let us briefly consider this Jonsonian testimony.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Early Modern Low Countries 1 (2017) 1, pp. 30-50 - eISSN: 2543-1587 30 ‘Before she ends up in a brothel’ Public Femininity and the First Actresses in England and the Low Countries Martine van Elk Martine van Elk is a Professor of English at California State University, Long Beach. Her research interests include early modern women, Shakespeare, and vagrancy. She is the author of numerous essays on these subjects, which have appeared in essay collections and in journals like Shakespeare Quarterly, Studies in English Literature, and Early Modern Women. Her book Early Modern Women’s Writing: Domesticity, Privacy, and the Public Sphere in England and the Low Countries has been pub- lished by Palgrave Macmillan (2017). Abstract This essay explores the first appearance of actresses on the public stage in England and the Dutch Republic. It considers the cultural climate, the theaters, and the plays selected for these early performances, particularly from the perspective of public femininity. In both countries antitheatricalists denounced female acting as a form of prostitution and evidence of inner corruption. In England, theaters were commercial institutions with intimate spaces that capitalized on the staging of privacy as theatrical. By contrast, the Schouwburg, the only public playhouse in Amsterdam, was an institu- tion with a more civic character, in which the actress could be treated as unequivocally a public figure. I explain these differences in the light of changing conceptions of public and private and suggest that the treatment of the actress shows a stronger pub- lic-private division in the Dutch Republic than in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Othello and Its Rewritings, from Nineteenth-Century Burlesque to Post- Colonial Tragedy
    Black Rams and Extravagant Strangers: Shakespeare’s Othello and its Rewritings, from Nineteenth-Century Burlesque to Post- Colonial Tragedy Catherine Ann Rosario Goldsmiths, University of London PhD thesis 1 Declaration I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. 2 Acknowledgements Firstly, I want to thank my supervisor John London for his immense generosity, as it is through countless discussions with him that I have been able to crystallise and evolve my ideas. I should also like to thank my family who, as ever, have been so supportive, and my parents, in particular, for engaging with my research, and Ebi for being Ebi. Talking things over with my friends, and getting feedback, has also been very helpful. My particular thanks go to Lucy Jenks, Jay Luxembourg, Carrie Byrne, Corin Depper, Andrew Bryant, Emma Pask, Tony Crowley and Gareth Krisman, and to Rob Lapsley whose brilliant Theory evening classes first inspired me to return to academia. Lastly, I should like to thank all the assistance that I have had from Goldsmiths Library, the British Library, Senate House Library, the Birmingham Shakespeare Collection at Birmingham Central Library, Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust and the Shakespeare Centre Library and Archive. 3 Abstract The labyrinthine levels through which Othello moves, as Shakespeare draws on myriad theatrical forms in adapting a bald little tale, gives his characters a scintillating energy, a refusal to be domesticated in language. They remain as Derridian monsters, evading any enclosures, with the tragedy teetering perilously close to farce. Because of this fragility of identity, and Shakespeare’s radical decision to have a black tragic protagonist, Othello has attracted subsequent dramatists caught in their own identity struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit “Intriguing Heroines and Scheming Servants. Unconventional Female and Lower-Class Characters in Selected Plays by Susanna Centlivre and Mary Davys” Verfasserin Christine Grossberger angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2008 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 344 353 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: LA Anglistik und Amerikanistik Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margarete Rubik CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by OTHES 2 3 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margarete Rubik, the first female Professor of English Literature at the University of Vienna, for sparking my interest in Restoration and eighteenth-century drama and for her ongoing support during the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank Jessica Munns, editor of Restoration and Eighteenth- Century Theatre Research for making Jane Milling’s valuable article “A Gotham Election: Women and Performance Politics” available for me. Additionally, I would like to thank Susan Glover for providing me with bibliographical reference of her article “Laying Claim to Title: Mary Davys and Authorial Dispossession.” Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my partner, Michael Schmid, and to the fulfilment of our dreams, to my parents, Silvia and Alfred, to my siblings Gabriele, Gerhard, and Günter Grossberger, and to my second family, Roswitha and Peter Schmid. Thank you all for your loving and understanding support, motivation, and encouragement. 4 5 CONTENTS I. SETTING THE PLAYS AND THEIR PLAYWRIGHTS IN CONTEXT ............. 9 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 9 2. Establishing the historical and political context............................... 12 2.1. End of the Interregnum and Restoration of the Stuart monarchy .
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and Gender: the ‘Woman’S Part’
    Shakespeare and gender: the ‘woman’s part’ Article written by:Clare McManus Themes:Shakespeare’s life and world, Gender, sexuality, courtship and marriage Published:15 Mar 2016 In Shakespeare's day, female parts were played by male actors, while more recently, actresses have taken on some of his most famous male roles such as Hamlet and Julius Caesar. Clare McManus explores gender in the history of Shakespeare performance. Shakespearean performance is an arena for exploring desire, sexuality and gender roles and for challenging audience expectations, especially when it comes to the female performer. Actresses have long claimed their right to Olympian roles like Hamlet: Sarah Bernhardt’s 1899 performance sits in a long tradition, most recently added to by Maxine Peake in her performance at Manchester’s Royal Exchange in 2014. Bernhardt’s performance divided audiences: this was certainly at least partly to do with the crossing of gender boundaries, with one early London reviewer revealing how polarised ideas of gender could be when he complained that ‘A woman is positively no more capable of beating out the music of Hamlet than is a man of expressing the plaintive and half-accomplished surrender of Ophelia’.[1] That said, it had become increasingly common by the turn of the 20th century for star actresses to take male parts, often called ‘breeches’ roles, and it is possible that one difficulty for London audiences lay in the fact that Bernhardt’s Hamlet was not Shakespeare’s text but a prose translation. Over a century later, Maxine Peake’s interpretation was widely praised, though reviewers still focussed on the presence of a female actor in the role, contextualising it against the rich history of female Hamlets and interrogating the opportunities open to women in theatre in the early 21st century.[2] Postcard of Sarah Bernhardt as Hamlet in 1899 The French actress, Sarah Bernhardt, crossed gender boundaries when she played the male hero in Hamlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: the Survival of the London Theatre Community
    Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: The Survival of the London Theatre Community By Mary Alex Staude Honors Thesis Department of English and Comparative Literature University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2018 Approved: (Signature of Advisor) Acknowledgements I would like to thank Reid Barbour for his support, guidance, and advice throughout this process. Without his help, this project would not be what it is today. Thanks also to Laura Pates, Adam Maxfield, Alex LaGrand, Aubrey Snowden, Paul Smith, and Playmakers Repertory Company. Also to Diane Naylor at Chatsworth Settlement Trustees. Much love to friends and family for encouraging my excitement about this project. Particular thanks to Nell Ovitt for her gracious enthusiasm, and to Hannah Dent for her unyielding support. I am grateful for the community around me and for the communities that came before my time. Preface Mary Alex Staude worked on ​Twelfth Night​ 2017 with Alex LaGrand who worked on ​King Lear​ 2016 with Zack Powell who worked on ​Henry IV Part II ​2015 with John Ahlin who worked on ​Macbeth​ 2000 with Jerry Hands who worked on ​Much Ado About Nothing​ 1984 with Derek Jacobi who worked on ​Othello ​1964 with Laurence Olivier who worked on ​Romeo and Juliet​ 1935 with Edith Evans who worked on ​The Merry Wives of Windsor​ 1918 with Ellen Terry who worked on ​The Winter’s Tale ​1856 with Charles Kean who worked on ​Richard III 1776 with David Garrick who worked on ​Hamlet ​1747 with Charles Macklin who worked on Henry IV​ 1738 with Colley Cibber who worked on​ Julius Caesar​ 1707 with Thomas Betterton who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1661 with William Davenant who worked on ​Henry VIII​ 1637 with John Lowin who worked on ​Henry VIII ​1613 with John Heminges who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1603 with William Shakespeare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beestons and the Art of Theatrical Management in Seventeenth-Century London
    THE BEESTONS AND THE ART OF THEATRICAL MANAGEMENT IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY LONDON by Christopher M. Matusiak A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Christopher M. Matusiak (2009) Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-61029-9 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-61029-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Poor Player That Struts and Frets His Hour Upon the Stage…”
    “A POOR PLAYER THAT STRUTS AND FRETS HIS HOUR UPON THE STAGE…” THE ENGLISH THEATRE IN TRANSITION A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Christin N. Gambill May, 2016 “A POOR PLAYER THAT STRUTS AND FRETS HIS HOUR UPON THE STAGE…” THE ENGLISH THEATRE IN TRANSITION Christin N. Gambill Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Mr. James Slowiak Dr. John Green _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. Adel Migid Dr. Chand Midha _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Date Dr. Hillary Nunn _______________________________ School Director Dr. J. Thomas Dukes ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. “THIS ROYAL THRONE THIS SCEPTERED ISLE…” THE THEATRE OF THE ENGLISH RENAISSANCE ............................................................................................... 1 II. THE COMING STORM .............................................................................................. 14 III. THE AXE FALLS ...................................................................................................... 29 IV. UNDER THEIR NOSES ............................................................................................ 42 V. THE NEW ORDER ..................................................................................................... 53 VI. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Men's Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews
    1 The King’s Men’s Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin My paper will focus on the immediately post-Shakespearean seventeenth century: the King’s Men’s repertory in the wake of Shakespeare’s retirement, and specifically the plays written by Fletcher (and his co-authors) while he was principal dramatist for the King’s Men. I will argue that the company was the first group to make Shakespeare “Shakespeare” and to imagine themselves in a specifically post-Shakespearean moment, for even after Shakespeare’s death the company self-consciously cultivated a Shakespearean repertory style in order to provide continuity with their earlier drama. In this way, Shakespeare became a guiding ideal for the company as much as a former sharer, his descendants’ works less derivative and more working within a specific house style. Particularly, I plan to examine two moments in Fletcher’s career. The first is the period 1620-22, in which Fletcher wrote a cluster of plays that were heavily influenced by The Tempest. I will argue that these plays served as a form of advance marketing for the First Folio, and constructed a particular image of “Shakespeare” that a reader opening to the first page of the Folio would immediately recognize. The second moment concerns the group of plays written by Fletcher (and Beaumont) for the King’s Men from Philaster on. The influence of Beaumont and Fletcher’s tragicomedy on Shakespeare has long been acknowledged, but I will argue that as Fletcher began to write for the King’s Men before, during, and after Shakespeare’s quasi-retirement in 1610, he cultivated a Shakespearean style, especially intrigued by the elder playwright’s focus on active heroines.
    [Show full text]