Protoperidinium Bolmonense Sp. Nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protoperidinium Bolmonense Sp. Nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae) Phycologia Archimer July 2008, Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 392–403 Archive Institutionnelle de l’Ifremer http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/PH07-82.1 http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/ © 2008 International Phycological Society Protoperidinium bolmonense sp. nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae), a small dinoflagellate from a brackish hypereutrophic lagoon (South of ailable on the publisher Web site France) Nicolas Chomérat1, * and Alain Couté2 1 IFREMER, Laboratoire Environnement et Ressources/Finistère Bretagne-Nord 13, rue de Kérose, F-29187 Concarneau Cedex, France 2 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département R.D.D.M. – USM 505, 57, Rue Cuvier – Case 39, F-75005 Paris, France blisher-authenticated version is av *: Corresponding author : N. Chomérat, email address : [email protected] Abstract: Described is a new Protoperidinium species from a brackish and hypereutrophic lagoon in the South of France, the Bolmon lagoon (‘Étang de Bolmon’). Protoperidinium bolmonense sp. nov. is a small dinoflagellate with a plate formula of Po, X, 4′, 3a, 7″, 3c, 4(?)s, 5‴ and 2″″. Its peculiar features are the presence of only three cingular plates, the marked extension of the second intercalary plate (2a) which abuts the second precingular plate (2″), the marked dorsoventral flattening and the shape of characteristic plates. Different variations of the epithecal plate pattern were observed in P. bolmonense population, involving the division or the fusion of pre-existing plates. Only one other Protoperidinium species, P. vorax, is known to possess only three cingular plates, but the thecal plate arrangement is not exactly the same. The relationship with other congeneric species and the position within the genus are discussed. From an ecological point of view, P. bolmonense was present in spring, in an oligo-mesohaline range of the salinity, which is not usual for Protoperidinium species. Because of the hypereutrophic conditions pertaining in the lagoon, the phytoplankton was abundant with dominant Planktothrix agardhii (cyanoprokaryota) and other autotrophic species. So, the latter ccepted for publication following peer review. The definitive pu might represent an important source of food for some marine heterotrophic dinoflagellates, especially those that can tolerate brackish water. In such environments, where large amounts of phytoplankton species are mixed, the identification of small dinoflagellates can be tedious. Scanning electron microscopy is very useful, and a simple method is described to isolate, prepare and observe a few dinoflagellate cells. Keywords: Brackish water, Dinoflagellates, Dinophyceae, Ecology, Coastal lagoon, Mediterranean area, Peridiniales, Phytoplankton, Salinity, Scanning electron microscopy, Taxonomy Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article a 1 Introduction Protoperidinium Bergh is a large genus of dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae), usually without chloroplasts and regarded as heterotrophic (Olseng et al., 2002). Because of its extreme diversity, this genus has had a long and complex taxonomic history (Gribble & Anderson, 2006). Most of the species had been formerly described as Peridinium Ehrenberg species, which included marine and freshwater organisms, and, originally, also species now placed in different genera. Bergh (1881) noticed that thecal plates always exhibit a certain basic pattern common within a genus and he introduced the genus Protoperidinium which included species with distinct sulcal lists, but leaving in Peridinium those with antapical horns or without sulcal lists. The importance of the morphology in identifying dinoflagellates was emphasized by Schütt (1895) and the genus Peridinium was divided by several workers into subgroups based on the cell outline and girdle displacement. Kofoid (1909) proposed a detailed description of thecal plates, upon which the current and generally accepted classification is based. Subsequently, Jörgensen (1912), emphasized the importance of thecal plate pattern in identifying species, and proposed new groups. Species with three intercalary plates were maintained in the genus Peridinium, whose subdivisions were based on the shape of the first apical 1′ plate, and the shape and position of the second intercalary 2a plate. The new genus Archaeperidinium was proposed for species with only two anterior intercalary plates. Some workers preferred to consider these genera as two sub-genera of Peridinium but used the subdivisions system of Jörgensen (Lebour, 1925) or adapted it (Paulsen, 1931). However, some investigators noticed that the number and shape of cingular and sulcal plates could be of a great interest in Perididium (sensu lato) taxonomy (cf. Taylor, 1976). Balech (1963) and Loeblich (1968) realized that marine 3 species of Peridinium were all found to possess three cingular plates plus a transitional plate, which contrasted with freshwater species that may have more cingular plates. Bourrelly (1968) investigated the cingular plates of twelve freshwater species and found that there were five or six plates. Balech (1974) transferred 231 marine species of Peridinium to the genus Protoperidinium. It included species with ortho, meta and para apical 1′ plate, intercalary plate with quadra, penta and hexa-type, four cingular plates, and six sulcal plates. Species with ortho-type of 1′ plate, five or six cingular plates and six sulcal plates were retained in Peridinium. Moreover, Balech (1974) found the subgenera useful to distinguish some abnormal plate numbers in the genus Protoperidinium, e.g. two intercalary plates in Archaeperidinium, six precingular in Minusculum and Protoperidinium for species with the typical plate formula Po, X, 4′, 3a, 7′′, 4c, 6(7)s, 5′′′, 2′′′′. Brackish waters are defined as a mixing of fresh water and sea water and exhibit biological communities with peculiar characteristics, which differentiate them from adjacent marine and continental biomes. As brackish waters, and especially coastal lagoons, are an area of colonization of freshwater and marine organisms, species well adapted to the conditions of low salinity and specific to these habitats cohabit with halotolerant species from the adjacent sea and freshwater tributaries (Remane & Schlieper, 1971). Since the separation of Peridinium and Protoperidinium into two distinct genera, the former is now considered as a freshwater or brackish genus while the latter is regarded as a strictly marine and cosmopolitan genus (Sournia, 1986; Steidinger & Tangen, 1996). However, coastal lagoons are generally highly productive systems (Barnes, 1980) and blooms of autotrophic species may be favourable to the presence of heterotrophic marine dinoflagellates (Sarno et al., 1993; Chomérat et al., 4 2004). In such conditions, some euryhaline Protoperidinium species may be present in brackish plankton (Caroppo, 2000). The identification of Protoperidinium and Peridinium species in light microscopy is mainly based upon the observation of the cell size and shape, the presence of horns or spines, the shape of apical plate 1′, intercalary plates, the apical pore complex (APC), ornamentation of thecal plates, the displacement of the cingulum, and the number of cingular and sulcal plates. In plankton from brackish areas, where both of these genera can occur mixed in abundant plankton, a correct identification can be tedious when cells are small, rounded and without a characteristic outline shape and antapical appendages. Hence, the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can greatly help to ensure a correct identification. For better results, this requires an isolation of cells and several dehydration steps prior to the observation (Couté, 2002). Unavoidably, some cells to be identified are lost during the preparation process, which can be detrimental when only a few specimens are available. To minimize losses inherent to the dehydration, we propose here a simple method to prepare a few cells to be observed under SEM, and consequently, particularly adapted for the preparation of rare or ‘precious’ taxa. This paper illustrates the thecal plate morphology of a new Protoperidinium, P. bolmonense, collected in a brackish hypereutrophic lagoon, which is an unusual habitat for a Protoperidinium species. This small dinoflagellate has a plate pattern and morphological features that do not correspond to any previously described within the genus. 5 Material and methods Samples collection. Material was collected from the Bolmon lagoon (43°25′ N, 5°11′ E) which is a brackish (oligo-mesohaline) and hypereutrophic lagoon located in the South of France, near Marseille. It measures about 5 km long, up to 1.5 km wide, and is 0.58 km2 in area. Its depth does not exceed 2.2 m. A further description of this ecosystem and of the ten stations sampled is detailed in Chomérat (2005) and Chomérat et al. (2007). Samples were collected with a sampling bottle just under the water surface to avoid floating detritus and were fixed with buffered formaldehyde for subsequent identification and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Analyses of environmental parameters were carried out according to Chomérat et al. (2007). Light microscopy. Cells were first isolated from field samples with a micropipette under an inverted microscope, and then observed and dissected with a Zeiss Universal compound microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with plan-apochromatic objectives, Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC), a digital camera and a drawing tube. Pictures and drawings were realized with the objectives 40/0.75
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrons De Biodiversité À L'échelle Globale Chez Les Dinoflagellés
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emerciements* ! Remerciements* A!l'issue!de!ce!travail!de!recherche!et!de!sa!rédaction,!j’ai!la!preuve!que!la!thèse!est!loin!d'être!un!travail! solitaire.! En! effet,! je! n'aurais! jamais! pu! réaliser! ce! travail! doctoral! sans! le! soutien! d'un! grand! nombre! de! personnes!dont!l’amitié,!la!générosité,!la!bonne!humeur%et%l'intérêt%manifestés%à%l'égard%de%ma%recherche%m'ont% permis!de!progresser!dans!cette!phase!délicate!de!«!l'apprentiGchercheur!».!
    [Show full text]
  • Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)
    Protocols for monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for sustainable aquaculture and coastal fisheries in Chile (Supplement data) Provided by Kyoko Yarimizu, et al. Table S1. Phytoplankton Naming Dictionary: This dictionary was constructed from the species observed in Chilean coast water in the past combined with the IOC list. Each name was verified with the list provided by IFOP and online dictionaries, AlgaeBase (https://www.algaebase.org/) and WoRMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/). The list is subjected to be updated. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Achnanthales Achnanthaceae Achnanthes Achnanthes longipes Bacillariophyta Coscinodiscophyceae Coscinodiscales Heliopeltaceae Actinoptychus Actinoptychus spp. Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Akashiwo Akashiwo sanguinea Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Amphidinium Amphidinium spp. Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Naviculales Amphipleuraceae Amphiprora Amphiprora spp. Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiophysales Catenulaceae Amphora Amphora spp. Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Anabaenopsis Anabaenopsis milleri Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema Anagnostidinema amphibium Anagnostidinema Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema lemmermannii Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Microcoleaceae Annamia Annamia toxica Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Aphanizomenon Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Mediterranean Free-Living Dinoflagellates Institutional Rate: € 938,-/Approx
    Botanica Marina Vol. 46,2003, pp. 215-242 © 2003 by Walter de Gruyter • Berlin ■ New York Subscriptions Botanica Marina is published bimonthly. Annual subscription rate (Volume 46,2003) Checklist of Mediterranean Free-living Dinoflagellates Institutional rate: € 938,-/approx. SFr1 50 1 in the US and Canada US $ 938,-. Individual rate: € 118,-/approx. SFr 189,-; in the US and Canada US $ 118,-. Personal rates apply only when copies are sent to F. Gómez a private address and payment is made by a personal check or credit card. Personal subscriptions must not be donated to a library. Single issues: € 178,-/approx. SFr 285,-. All prices exclude postage. Department of Aquatic Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan, [email protected] Orders Institutional subscription orders should be addressed to the publishers orto your usual subscription agent. Individual subscrip­ tion orders must be sent directly to one of the addresses indicated below. The Americas: An annotated checklist of the free-living dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) of the Mediterranean Sea, based on Walter de Gruyter, Inc., 200 Saw Mill River Road, Hawthorne, N.Y. 10532, USA, Tel. 914-747-0110, Fax 914-747-1326, literature records, is given. The distribution of 673 species in 9 Mediterranean sub-basins is reported. The e-mail: [email protected]. number of taxa among the sub-basins was as follows: Ligurian (496 species), Balear-Provençal (360), Adri­ Australia and New Zealand: atic (322), Tyrrhenian (284), Ionian (283), Levantine (268), Aegean (182), Alborán (179) and Algerian Seas D. A. Information Services, 648 Whitehorse Road, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Peridinium Quinquecorne Var. Trispiniferum Var
    Acta Botanica Mexicana 94: 125-140 (2011) PERIDINIUM QUINQUECORNE VAR. TRISPINIFERUM VAR. NOV. (DINOPHYCEAE) FROM A BRACKISH ENVIRONMENT JOSÉ ANTOLÍN AKÉ -CA STILLO 1 A ND GA BRIEL A VÁZQUEZ 2 1Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ciencia Marinas y Pesquerías. Calle Hidalgo 617, Colonia Río Jamapa, 94290 Boca del Río, Veracruz, México. [email protected] .2Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Red de Ecología Funcional. Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México. ABSTRACT Peridinium quinquecorne is a marine dinoflagellate that bears four characteristic thick spines on the hypotheca. Some specimens, which characteristics of shape, number and arrangement of plates matched those of this species, were found in phytoplankton samples collected at the Sontecomapan coastal lagoon, Mexico, in 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2007. However, the organisms collected bore three spines on the hypotheca instead of four, as described for P. quinquecorne. The number of spines and their position on antapical plates were features consistently observed over at least a nine years period. From October 2002 to October 2003, we followed the dynamics of the phytoplankton community at the lagoon and this organism was found only in February and June, when salinity values were lower than 21‰ and temperatures higher than 24.5 °C. In February 2003, this organism reached high cell densities and became the dominant species in the phytoplankton community. Based on observations on the morphology of this dinoflagellate under the light and electron microscopes and its constant possession of only three spines, we propose the new variety name Peridinium quinquecorne var. trispiniferum for this taxon which caused a bloom in this tropical brackish system.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrippsiella Trochoidea (F.Stein) A.R.Loebl
    MOLECULAR DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE CALCAREOUS DINOPHYTES (THORACOSPHAERACEAE, PERIDINIALES) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München zur Begutachtung vorgelegt von Sylvia Söhner München, im Februar 2013 Erster Gutachter: PD Dr. Marc Gottschling Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Susanne Renner Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 06. Juni 2013 “IF THERE IS LIFE ON MARS, IT MAY BE DISAPPOINTINGLY ORDINARY COMPARED TO SOME BIZARRE EARTHLINGS.” Geoff McFadden 1999, NATURE 1 !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+! +"!,-"!'-.&/%)$"-"!0'* 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2& ")3*'4$%/5%6%*!+1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 7! 8,#$0)"!0'*+&9&6"*,+)-08!+ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 :! 5%*%-"$&0*!-'/,)!0'* 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ;! "#$!%"&'(!)*+&,!-!"#$!'./+,#(0$1$!2! './+,#(0$1$!-!3+*,#+4+).014!1/'!3+4$0&41*!041%%.5.01".+/! 67! './+,#(0$1$!-!/&"*.".+/!1/'!4.5$%"(4$! 68! ./!5+0&%!-!"#$!"#+*10+%,#1$*10$1$! 69! "#+*10+%,#1$*10$1$!-!5+%%.4!1/'!$:"1/"!'.;$*%."(! 6<! 3+4$0&41*!,#(4+)$/(!-!0#144$/)$!1/'!0#1/0$! 6=! 1.3%!+5!"#$!"#$%.%! 62! /0+),++0'* 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111<=!
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Brachidinium Capitatum (Dinophyceae) from the Gulf of Mexico Indicates Membership in the Kareniaceae1
    J. Phycol. 47, 366–374 (2011) Ó 2011 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00960.x PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF BRACHIDINIUM CAPITATUM (DINOPHYCEAE) FROM THE GULF OF MEXICO INDICATES MEMBERSHIP IN THE KARENIACEAE1 Darren W. Henrichs Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA Heidi M. Sosik, Robert J. Olson Department of Biology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA and Lisa Campbell2 Department of Oceanography and Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA Brachidinium capitatum F. J. R. Taylor, typically ITS, internal transcribed spacer; ML, maximum considered a rare oceanic dinoflagellate, and one likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony which has not been cultured, was observed at ele- ) vated abundances (up to 65 cells Æ mL 1) at a coastal station in the western Gulf of Mexico in the fall of 2007. Continuous data from the Imaging FlowCyto- Members of the genus Brachidinium have been bot (IFCB) provided cell images that documented observed in samples from throughout the world, yet the bloom during 3 weeks in early November. they remain poorly known because they have always Guided by IFCB observations, field collection per- been recorded at extremely low abundances. The mitted phylogenetic analysis and evaluation of the type species, B. capitatum, originally described by relationship between Brachidinium and Karenia. Taylor (1963) from the southwest Indian Ocean, Sequences from SSU, LSU, internal transcribed has also been identified from the Pacific Ocean spacer (ITS), and cox1 regions for B. capitatum were (Hernandez-Becerril and Bravo-Sierra 2004, Gomez compared with five other species of Karenia; all 2006), the northeast Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterra- B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigment-Based Chloroplast Types in Dinoflagellates
    Vol. 465: 33–52, 2012 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 28 doi: 10.3354/meps09879 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Pigment-based chloroplast types in dinoflagellates Manuel Zapata1,†, Santiago Fraga2, Francisco Rodríguez2,*, José L. Garrido1 1Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, CSIC, c/ Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain 2Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Subida a Radio Faro 50, 36390 Vigo, Spain ABSTRACT: Most photosynthetic dinoflagellates contain a chloroplast with peridinin as the major carotenoid. Chloroplasts from other algal lineages have been reported, suggesting multiple plas- tid losses and replacements through endosymbiotic events. The pigment composition of 64 dino- flagellate species (122 strains) was analysed by using high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition to chlorophyll (chl) a, both chl c2 and divinyl protochlorophyllide occurred in chl c-con- taining species. Chl c1 co-occurred with chl c2 in some peridinin-containing (e.g. Gambierdiscus spp.) and fucoxanthin-containing dinoflagellates (e.g. Kryptoperidinium foliaceum). Chl c3 occurred in dinoflagellates whose plastids contained 19’-acyloxyfucoxanthins (e.g. Karenia miki- motoi). Chl b was present in green dinoflagellates (Lepidodinium chlorophorum). Based on unique combinations of chlorophylls and carotenoids, 6 pigment-based chloroplast types were defined: Type 1: peridinin/dinoxanthin/chl c2 (Alexandrium minutum); Type 2: fucoxanthin/ 19’-acyloxy fucoxanthins/4-keto-19’-acyloxy-fucoxanthins/gyroxanthin diesters/chl c2, c3, mono - galac to syl-diacylglycerol-chl c2 (Karenia mikimotoi); Type 3: fucoxanthin/19’-acyloxyfucoxan- thins/gyroxanthin diesters/chl c2, c3 (Karlodinium veneficum); Type 4: fucoxanthin/chl c1, c2 (K. foliaceum); Type 5: alloxanthin/chl c2/phycobiliproteins (Dinophysis tripos); Type 6: neoxanthin/ violaxanthin/a major unknown carotenoid/chl b (Lepidodinium chlorophorum).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Clarification of the Dinophyte Peridinium Acuminatum Ehrenb., ≡ Scrippsiella Acuminata, Comb
    Phytotaxa 220 (3): 239–256 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.220.3.3 Taxonomic clarification of the dinophyte Peridinium acuminatum Ehrenb., ≡ Scrippsiella acuminata, comb. nov. (Thoracosphaeraceae, Peridiniales) JULIANE KRETSCHMANN1, MALTE ELBRÄCHTER2, CARMEN ZINSSMEISTER1,3, SYLVIA SOEHNER1, MONIKA KIRSCH4, WOLF-HENNING KUSBER5 & MARC GOTTSCHLING1,* 1 Department Biologie, Systematische Botanik und Mykologie, GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, D – 80638 München, Germany 2 Wattenmeerstation Sylt des Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Hafenstr. 43, D – 25992 List/Sylt, Germany 3 Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Südstrand 44, D – 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany 4 Universität Bremen, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften – Fachrichtung Historische Geologie/Paläontologie, Klagenfurter Straße, D – 28359 Bremen, Germany 5 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8, D – 14195 Berlin, Germany * Corresponding author (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Peridinium acuminatum (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae) was described in the first half of the 19th century, but the name has been rarely adopted since then. It was used as type of Goniodoma, Heteraulacus and Yesevius, providing various sources of nomenclatural and taxonomic confusion. Particularly, several early authors emphasised that the organisms investigated by C.G. Ehrenberg and S.F.N.R. von Stein were not conspecific, but did not perform the necessary taxonomic conclusions. The holotype of P. acuminatum is an illustration dating back to 1834, which makes the determination of the species ambiguous. We collected, isolated, and cultivated Scrippsiella acuminata, comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes Functioned in Kleptoplastids of Dinophysis Are Derived From
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genes functioned in kleptoplastids of Dinophysis are derived from haptophytes rather than from Received: 30 October 2018 Accepted: 5 June 2019 cryptophytes Published: xx xx xxxx Yuki Hongo1, Akinori Yabuki2, Katsunori Fujikura 2 & Satoshi Nagai1 Toxic dinofagellates belonging to the genus Dinophysis acquire plastids indirectly from cryptophytes through the consumption of the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Dinophysis acuminata harbours three genes encoding plastid-related proteins, which are thought to have originated from fucoxanthin dinofagellates, haptophytes and cryptophytes via lateral gene transfer (LGT). Here, we investigate the origin of these plastid proteins via RNA sequencing of species related to D. fortii. We identifed 58 gene products involved in porphyrin, chlorophyll, isoprenoid and carotenoid biosyntheses as well as in photosynthesis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the genes associated with chlorophyll and carotenoid biosyntheses and photosynthesis originated from fucoxanthin dinofagellates, haptophytes, chlorarachniophytes, cyanobacteria and cryptophytes. Furthermore, nine genes were laterally transferred from fucoxanthin dinofagellates, whose plastids were derived from haptophytes. Notably, transcription levels of diferent plastid protein isoforms varied signifcantly. Based on these fndings, we put forth a novel hypothesis regarding the evolution of Dinophysis plastids that ancestral Dinophysis species acquired plastids from haptophytes or fucoxanthin dinofagellates, whereas LGT from cryptophytes occurred more recently. Therefore, the evolutionary convergence of genes following LGT may be unlikely in most cases. Plastids in photosynthetic dinofagellates are classifed into fve types according to their origin1. Plastids in most photosynthetic dinofagellates are bound by three membranes and contain peridinin as the major carotenoid. Although peridinin is considered to have originated from an endosymbiotic red alga1, this hypothesis remains controversial2.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of Dinoflagellates with a Diatom Endosymbiont
    Title Origin and Evolution of Dinoflagellates with a Diatom Endosymbiont Author(s) Horiguchi, Takeo Citation Edited by Shunsuke F. Mawatari, Hisatake Okada., 53-59 Issue Date 2004 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/38506 Type proceedings International Symposium on "Dawn of a New Natural History - Integration of Geoscience and Biodiversity Studies". 5- Note 6 March 2004. Sapporo, Japan. File Information p53-59-neo-science.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Origin and Evolution of Dinoflagellates with a Diatom Endosymbiont Takeo Horiguchi Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan ABSTRACT The origin and evolutionary scenario of a small group of dinoflagellates with unusual chloroplasts are discussed. These dinoflagellates are known to possess an endosymbiotic alga of diatom origin. These are Durinskia baltica, Kryptoperidinium foliaceum, Peridinium quinquecorne, Durinskia sp., Gymnodinium quadrilobatum, Peridiniopsis rhomboids, Dinothrix paradoxa and a new coccoid di- noflagellate from Palau (P-18 strain). Although these eight species share a similar type of endosym- biont, morphologically they are so diverse that they may be classified as different entities, even to the ordinal level, using the current taxonomic criteria. To investigate the origin(s) and phylogenetic affinities of these dinoflagellates, the SSU rRNA and rbcL genes of D. baltica, K foliaceum, Durinskia sp., Peridiniopsis rhomboids, Dinothrix paradoxa and P-18 strain were sequenced and analysed. Phylogenetic trees based on nuclear encoded SSU rRNA gene strongly suggested that all these endosymbiotic dinoflagellates are monophyletic. The phylogenetic analyses based on the plas- tid encoded rbcL gene also revealed that all the endosymbiotic algae formed a unique clade within the diatom clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variations in Planktonic Community Structure and Production in an Atlantic Coastal Pond: the Importance of Nanoflagellates C
    Seasonal Variations in Planktonic Community Structure and Production in an Atlantic Coastal Pond: The Importance of Nanoflagellates C. Dupuy, M. Ryckaert, S. Le Gall, H. J. Hartmann To cite this version: C. Dupuy, M. Ryckaert, S. Le Gall, H. J. Hartmann. Seasonal Variations in Planktonic Community Structure and Production in an Atlantic Coastal Pond: The Importance of Nanoflagellates. Microbial Ecology, Springer Verlag, 2007, 10.1007/s00248-006-9087-z. hal-01248036 HAL Id: hal-01248036 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01248036 Submitted on 26 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Microbial Ecology Seasonal Variations in Planktonic Community Structure and Production in an Atlantic Coastal Pond: The Importance of Nanoflagellates C. Dupuy1, M. Ryckaert2, S. Le Gall1 and H. J. Hartmann1 (1) CRELA, UMR 6217, Poˆle Science Av. Michel Cre´peau, 17042 La Rochelle, France (2) DEL/IFREMER BP 5, 17137 L’Houmeau, France Received: 31 March 2006 / Accepted: 18 April 2006 / Online publication: 3 April 2007 Abstract was high. We suggest, first, that nanoflagellates represented the primary resource available in the pond and could The structure and summertime production of planktonic constitute an important food resource for higher trophic communities and the role of nondiatom planktonic cells levels, such as oysters, farmed in this type of pond.
    [Show full text]