Near Failure at Nagasaki

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Near Failure at Nagasaki Near Failure at Nagasaki The first atomic mission was executed perfectly. On the second one, almost everything went wrong. By John T. Correll iroshima lay in ruins. for Japan to continue, but no one knew the evening of Aug. 8, it was loaded Eighty thousand people how long that would take. The invasion aboard the B-29 that would deliver it. had been killed instantly plan called for the commitment of a Thus began the chain of events that and two-thirds of the US force of 1,865,000. Another year would culminate in the detonation city destroyed by the of war plus an invasion of Japan prob- of the atomic bomb at Nagasaki the Hatomic bomb dropped ably meant US casualties in the range next day. by the B-29 Enola Gay on Aug. 6, of a quarter million and similar losses Whereas Hiroshima was a perfectly 1945. For Japan, the war had been lost for the Japanese. executed operation, almost nothing went for some time. Since the beginning of The alternative was to drop another right on the second atomic mission, and the year, American B-29s had been atomic bomb. A second bomb was in it came close to failure. This mission systematically demolishing Japan’s place at North Field on Tinian in the drew less attention, both in news at the urban areas and industrial centers with Mariana Islands, home base of the time and by historians later, than did incendiary bombs. 509th Composite Group, which had the bombing of Hiroshima. The main The military regime refused to ac- flown the Hiroshima mission. No other problems with the Nagasaki operation cept defeat. Japan still had five million atomic bombs were yet available, but have been known since 1945, but the troops, 10,000 airplanes—more than the United States wanted the Japanese extent of difficulties and the discord half of them configured for suicide to believe there was an unlimited supply. among participants were not fully dis- missions—and a seven-month supply The mission was planned for Aug. 11 closed until the 1990s. of aviation fuel. The United States but a forecast for bad weather moved The pilot in command for Nagasaki resumed the firebombing missions and it up to Aug. 9. The bomb, called “Fat was Maj. Charles W. Sweeney, 25, continued planning for an invasion of Man,” was stored under tight security chosen for the assignment by the 509th Japanese home islands. and controlled conditions in an air- commander, Col. Paul W. Tibbets Jr., Sooner or later, the bombing and naval conditioned hut with a rubberized who had flown the Hiroshima mission interdiction would make it impossible floor to prevent accidental sparks. On himself. Sweeney was commander of 60 AIR FORCE Magazine / July 2011 Bockscar en route to Japan, carrying Fat Man, the nuclear bomb that would be dropped on Nagasaki. Near Failure at Nagasaki USAF photo the 393rd Bomb Squadron. He had and drop the bomb. The Great Artiste was servation/photo airplane, inelegantly been on the Hiroshima mission, fly- still rigged with the instrument package named Big Stink. According to Swee- ing the instrument plane, The Great it carried at Hiroshima, so Sweeney ney, Hopkins had a noncooperative Artiste, which measured the effects of and Capt. Frederick C. Bock switched attitude, possibly because the mission the detonation. Over Hiroshima, he was airplanes. Sweeney and his crew took commander was his junior. He walked 30 feet off the right wing of Tibbets’ Bockscar and Bock and his crew flew away from Sweeney’s reminder about plane, the Enola Gay. Sweeney had The Great Artiste, which would again the rendezvous plan, saying, “I know drawn that assignment because Tibbets serve as the instrument plane. how to make a rendezvous.” intended him to fly the next mission, if To avoid identification as atomic There were two weather airplanes. there was one, and wanted him to have bomb aircraft, the six B-29s bore the Enola Gay, flown by Capt. George the step-by-step experience. triangle N tail marking of the 44th Bomb Marquardt, would go ahead to report The primary target for the next mis- Group instead of the forward arrow of conditions from the primary target, sion was not Nagasaki. It was Kokura, the 509th. None of the mission aircraft Kokura, and Laggin’ Dragon, flown about 95 miles southwest of Hiroshima, had their names painted on the nose. by Capt. Charles F. McKnight, would where one of the largest arsenals in This led to confusion for William L. scout the weather at Nagasaki. Capt. Japan was located, surrounded by urban Laurence of the New York Times, who Ralph Taylor would position the sixth industrial structures. Nagasaki was the was authorized to go along and write a B-29, Full House, at Iwo Jima as a secondary target, to be struck only if first-person account. He thought Swee- backup aircraft. circumstances ruled out the attack on ney was still flying The Great Artiste Three mission specialists augmented Kokura. and so reported in his article. In fact, Sweeney’s regular crew on Bockscar: a Laurence himself was aboard The Great radar countermeasures officer and two The Aircraft Artiste, which was flown by Bock. weaponeers with special knowledge Six B-29s were allocated to the mis- Lt. Col. James I. Hopkins Jr., the and understanding of the atomic bomb. sion. Sweeney would fly the lead aircraft group operations officer, flew the ob- The senior weaponeer was Navy Cmdr. AIR FORCE Magazine / July 2011 61 replaced them with red arming plugs. The bomb was ready to go. The original plan had been for the three aircraft to reassemble over Iwo Jima, which had been the rendezvous for the Hiroshima mission. On Aug. 9, a typhoon was gathering momentum around Iwo Jima so the rendezvous point was Yakushima, a small island off the coast of Kyushu. “Because of bad weather at lower altitudes and our proximity to the Japanese mainland, the rendezvous would be at 30,000 feet instead of 8,000 as on the Hiro- shima mission,” Sweeney said, which consumed additional fuel. MIssed Rendezvous The Great Artiste was at the ren- dezvous point but Big Stink was not. Bockscar and crew (note the missing nose art). Capt. Kermit Beahan (wearing The orders from Tibbets were explicit. glasses), whom many believe saved the mission from failure, stands next to Maj. Make a single 360-degree circle of the Charles Sweeney (dark shirt), the pilot and mission commander. rendezvous area, then proceed. “My orders were to wait 15 minutes and Frederick L. Ashworth, who had man- Complications then leave for the target, but the mission aged the field testing of the atomic The crews briefed shortly before brief also called for three airplanes to bomb at Los Alamos, N.M. midnight, had their pre-mission break- proceed to the target,” Sweeney said. A Sweeney had no previous combat fast at the mess hall and were driven message from Marquardt in the Enola experience, but Ashworth had com- out to their airplanes at 1 a.m. The Gay said the weather at Kokura was clear manded a squadron of Grumman TBF first big problem came when flight for bombing, but Sweeney circled the Avengers at Guadalcanal. In the after- engineer MSgt. John D. Kuharek rendezvous for 45 minutes. Unknown math of the mission it would be said, notified Sweeney that the fuel in the to Sweeney, who was maintaining radio notably by Tibbets, that Sweeney had reserve tank in Bockscar’s rear bomb silence, Hopkins in Big Stink was circling deferred too much to Ashworth. bay bladder was not pumping. Of 7,250 at 39,000 feet, 9,000 feet higher than he “The job of Ashworth was to arm gallons of fuel aboard, 600 gallons was supposed to be. the bomb, assure its readiness to be were in the reserve tank. Sweeney “When only one plane showed up, I dropped, and, ultimately, make the ‘no climbed out of the aircraft and went to told Sweeney that I wanted to be sure drop’ call if something went wrong with talk with Tibbets, who was watching that we had the instrument-carrying the detonating system,” Tibbets said. from the ramp. aircraft with us,” Ashworth said. “Why “Those tasks defined the realm of his Tibbets told Sweeney he did not Sweeney didn’t tell me that the instru- authority aboard Bockscar.” need the fuel in the bladder, it was ment aircraft was already with us, I It is sometimes argued that Sweeney only there to balance the weight of don’t know.” In later years, Tibbets and Ashworth were in “joint command.” the bomb in the forward bomb bay, said Sweeney’s delay may have been That is wrong. Sweeney was clearly but if Sweeney disagreed, he had the due to pressure from Ashworth, a point the mission commander. Ashworth’s authority as commander to cancel the that Ashworth vigorously denied. authority covered decisions about mission. Sweeney decided to go. Tib- Sweeney said, “When Hopkins the bomb because of his specialized bets pointed out that he was off to a failed to make the rendezvous and knowledge. Influence was another mat- late start and that he should not linger couldn’t find us, for some inexplicable ter, and Ashworth exerted a powerful at the rendezvous point if the escort reason he broke radio silence and ra- influence on Sweeney. aircraft did not show up. dioed back to Tinian, ‘Has Sweeney Fat Man was loaded into Bockscar’s Bockscar roared down the runway aborted?’ The message got garbled bomb bay at 10 p.m.
Recommended publications
  • The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay: the Crew
    AFA’s Enola Gay Controversy Archive Collection www.airforcemag.com The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay From the Air Force Association’s Enola Gay Controversy archive collection Online at www.airforcemag.com The Crew The Commander Paul Warfield Tibbets was born in Quincy, Ill., Feb. 23, 1915. He joined the Army in 1937, became an aviation cadet, and earned his wings and commission in 1938. In the early years of World War II, Tibbets was an outstanding B-17 pilot and squadron commander in Europe. He was chosen to be a test pilot for the B-29, then in development. In September 1944, Lt. Col. Tibbets was picked to organize and train a unit to deliver the atomic bomb. He was promoted to colonel in January 1945. In May 1945, Tibbets took his unit, the 509th Composite Group, to Tinian, from where it flew the atomic bomb missions against Japan in August. After the war, Tibbets stayed in the Air Force. One of his assignments was heading the bomber requirements branch at the Pentagon during the development of the B-47 jet bomber. He retired as a brigadier general in 1966. In civilian life, he rose to chairman of the board of Executive Jet Aviation in Columbus, Ohio, retiring from that post in 1986. At the dedication of the National Air and Space Museum’s Udvar- Hazy Center in December 2003, the 88-year-old Tibbets stood in front of the restored Enola Gay, shaking hands and receiving the high regard of visitors. (Col. Paul Tibbets in front of the Enola Gay—US Air Force photo) The Enola Gay Crew Airplane Crew Col.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT of the International Peoples' Tribunal on the Dropping
    JUDGEMENT Of The International Peoples' Tribunal On the Dropping of Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and Nagasaki July 16, 2007 Judges Lennox S. Hinds Carlos Vargas IE Masaji Prosecutors Mr. ADACHI Shuichi Mr. INOUE Masanobu Ms. SHIMONAKA Nami Mr. AKIMOTO Masahiro Mr. CHE Bong Tae Amicus Curiae Mr. OHKUBO Kenichi 1 PLAINTIFFS A-Bomb Survivors Citizens of Hiroshima Citizens of Nagasaki Any Other Supporters of A-Bomb Survivors DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA US. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt U.S. President, Harry S. Truman James F. Byrnes, Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of War George C. Marshall, Army Chief of Staff Thomas T. Handy, Army Acting Chief of Staff Henrry H. Arnold, Commander of the Army Air Forces Carl A. Spaatz, Commander of the US Strategic Air Force Curtis E. LeMay, Commander of the 20th Bomber Command Paul W. Tibbets, Pilot of B-29 “Enola Gay” William S. Parsons, Weaponeer of B-29 “Enola Gay” Charles W. Sweeny, Pilot of B-29 “Book s Car” Frederick L. Ashworth, Weaponeer of B-29 “Bocks Car” Leslie R. Groves, Head of the Manhattan Project J. Robert Oppenheimer, Director of the Los Alamos Laboratory REGISTRY TSUBOI Sunao, SASAKI Takeya, TANAKA Yuki, FUNAHASHI Yoshie YOKOHARA Yukio, TOSHIMOTO Katsumi, OKUHARA Hiromi KUNO Naruaki, HINADA Seishi 2 A: Universal Jurisdiction of the Court 1. In accordance with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Charter of the International Peoples' Tribunal on the Dropping of Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Tribunal has jurisdiction over crimes committed against the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the victims of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9, 1945, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Trivia Questions
    TRIVIA QUESTIONS Submitted by: ANS Savannah River - A. Bryson, D. Hanson, B. Lenz, M. Mewborn 1. What was the code name used for the first U.S. test of a dry fuel hydrogen bomb? Castle Bravo 2. What was the name of world’s first artificial nuclear reactor to achieve criticality? Chicago Pile-1 (CP-1), I also seem to recall seeing/hearing them referred to as “number one,” “number two,” etc. 3. How much time elapsed between the first known sustained nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago and the _____ Option 1: {first use of this new technology as a weapon} or Option 2: {dropping of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima} A3) First chain reaction = December 2nd 1942, First bomb-drop = August 6th 1945 4. Some sort of question drawing info from the below tables. For example, “what were the names of the other aircraft that accompanied the Enola Gay (one point for each correct aircraft name)?” Another example, “What was the common word in the call sign of the pilots who flew the Japanese bombing missions?” A4) Screenshots of tables from the Wikipedia page “Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” Savannah River Trivia / Page 1 of 18 5. True or False: Richard Feynman’s name is on the patent for a nuclear powered airplane? (True) 6. What is the Insectary of Bobo-Dioulasso doing to reduce the spread of sleeping sickness and wasting diseases that affect cattle using a nuclear technique? (Sterilizing tsetse flies; IAEA.org) 7. What was the name of the organization that studied that radiological effects on people after the atomic bombings? Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinian: Not Just an Island in the Pacific
    TINIAN: NOT JUST AN ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC It is a small island, less than 40 square miles, a flat green dot in the vastness of Pacific blue. Fly over it and you notice a slash across its north end of uninhabited bush, a long thin line that looks like an overgrown dirt runway. If you didn't know what it was, you wouldn't give it a second glance out your airplane window. On the ground, you see the runway isn't dirt but tarmac and crushed limestone, abandoned with weeds sticking out of it. Yet this is arguably the most historical airstrip on earth. This is where World War II was won. This is Runway Able On July 24, 1944, 30,000 US Marines landed on the beaches of Tinian. Eight days later, over 8,000 of the 8,800 Japanese soldiers on the island were dead (vs. 328 Marines), and four months later the Seabees had built the busiest airfield of WWII - dubbed North Field – enabling B-29 Superfortresses to launch air attacks on the Philippines, Okinawa, and mainland Japan. Late in the afternoon of August 5, 1945, a B-29 was maneuvered over a bomb loading pit, then after lengthy preparations, taxied to the east end of North Field's main runway, Runway Able, and at 2:45am in the early morning darkness of August 6, took off. The B-29 was piloted by Col. Paul Tibbets of the US Army Air Force, who had named the plane after his mother, Enola Gay. The crew named the bomb they were carrying Little Boy.
    [Show full text]
  • Weapon Physics Division
    -!! Chapter XV WEAPON PHYSICS DIVISION Introduction 15.1 At the time of its organization in August 1944, the Weapon Physics or G Division (G for gadget, code for weapon) was given a directive to carry out experiments on the critical assembly of active materials, to de- vise methods for the study of the implosion, and to exploit these methods to gain information about the implosion. In April 1945, the G Division directive was extended to fnclude the responsibility for the design and procurement of the hnplosion tamper, as well as the active core. In addition to its primary work with critical assemblies and implosion studies, G Division undertook the design and testing of an implosion initiator and of electric detonators for the high explosive. The Electronics Group was transferred from the Experi- mental Physics Division to G Division, and the Photographic Section of the Ordnance Division became G Divisionts Photographic Group. 15.2 The initial organization of the division, unchanged during the year which this account covers, was as follows: G-1 Critical Assemblies O. R. Frisch G-2 The X-Ray Method L. W. Parratt G-3 The Magnetic Method E. W. McMillan G-4 Electronics W. A. Higginbotham G-5 The Betatron Method S. H. Neddermeyer G-6 The RaLa Method B. ROSSi G-7 Electric Detonators L. W. Alvarez G-8 The Electric Method D. K. Froman G-9 (Absorbed in Group G-1) G-10 Initiator Group C. L. Critchfield G-n Optics J. E. Mack - 228 - 15.3 For the work of G Division a large new laboratory building was constructed, Gamma Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Quarterly
    01 Fall 07 masters.2bak:Winter 03-04 MASTERS.1 8/8/07 11:11 AM Page 1 THE GustavusGustavus Adolphus College Fall 2007 QUARTERLY BigBig stinkstink onon campuscampus Plus I Three Views of Virginia I Stadiums Come and Go I Stringing Along with the Rydell Professor 01 Fall 07 masters.2bak:Winter 03-04 MASTERS.1 8/8/07 11:11 AM Page 2 G THE GUSTAVUS QUARTERLY Fall 2007 • Vol. LXIII, No. 4 Managing Editor Steven L. Waldhauser ’70 [email protected] Alumni Editors Randall M. Stuckey ’83 [email protected] Barbara Larson Taylor ’93 [email protected] Design Sharon Stevenson [email protected] Contributing Writers Laura Behling, Kathryn Christenson, Gwendolyn Freed, Teresa Harland ’94, Tim Kennedy ’82, Donald Myers ’83, Brian O’Brien, Paul Saulnier, Dana Setterholm ’07, Randall Stuckey ’83, Matt Thomas ’00, Thomas Young ’88 Contributing Photographers Anders Björling ’58, Ashley Henningsgaard ’07, Joel Jackson ’71, Joe Lencioni ’05, Tom Roster, Wayne Schmidt, Sharon Stevenson, Matt Thomas ’00, Stan Waldhauser ’71 Articles and opinions presented in this magazine do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors or official policies of the College or its board of trustees. The Gustavus Quarterly (USPS 227-580) is published four times annually, in February, May, August, and November, by Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minn. Periodicals postage is paid at St. Peter, MN 56082, and additional mailing offices. It is mailed free of charge to alumni and friends of the College. Circulation is approximately 35,000. Postmaster: Send address changes to The Gustavus Quarterly, Office of Alumni Relations, Gustavus Adolphus College, 800 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagasaki and the Hibakusha Experience of Sumiteru Taniguchi: the Painful Struggles and Ultimate Triumphs of Nagasaki Hibakusha
    Volume 18 | Issue 16 | Number 1 | Article ID 5447 | Aug 15, 2020 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Nagasaki and the Hibakusha Experience of Sumiteru Taniguchi: The Painful Struggles and Ultimate Triumphs of Nagasaki Hibakusha Sumiteru Taniguchi Introduction by Peter J. Kuznick Abstract: Sumiteru Taniguchi was one of the Many of the more than 250,000 who lived in “lucky” ones. He lived a long and productive Nagasaki on August 9, 1945 were not so lucky. life. He married and fathered two healthy Tens of thousands were killed instantly by the children who gave him four grandchildren and plutonium core atomic bomb the U.S. dropped two great grandchildren. He had a long career that day from the B29 Bockscar, captained by in Japan’s postal and telegraph services. As a Major Charles Sweeney. The bomb, nicknamed leader in Japan’s anti-nuclear movement, he “Fat Man,” exploded with a force equivalent to addressed thousands of audiences and21 kilotons of TNT and wiped out an area that covered three square miles, shattering hundreds of thousands of people. Many of the windows eleven miles away. Some 74,000 were more than 250,000 who lived in Nagasaki on dead by the end of the year. The death toll August 9, 1945 were not so lucky. reached 140,000 by 1950. Included among the victims were thousands of Korean slave Keywords: Nagasaki, atomic bomb, hibakusha, laborers, who toiled in Japanese mines, fields, Sumiteru Taniguchi, the atomic decision and factories. Since then, atomic bomb-related injuries and illnesses have claimed thousands more victims and caused immense suffering to Sumiteru Taniguchi was one of the “lucky” many of the survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity 7: Can the Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Be Justified?
    Activity 7: Instructions World War II Activity 7: Can the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be justified? Purpose To examine historic evidence to draw conclusions and reach informed opinions. Curriculum Focus History - Understand the diverse experiences and ideas, beliefs and attitudes of men, women and children in past societies, identify and explain change and continuity within and across periods of history identify, select and use a range of historical sources, evaluate the sources used in order to reach reasoned conclusions, present and organise accounts and explanations about the past that are coherent, structured and substantiated, use chronological conventions and historical vocabulary. Communication – Oracy, reading, writing. ICT - Structure, refine and communicate information, produce a presentation. Thinking Skills - Identify the problem and set the questions to resolve it, suggest a range of options as to where and how to find relevant information and ideas, ask probing questions, build on existing skills, knowledge and understanding, evaluate options, use prior knowledge to explain links between cause and effect and justify inferences/ predictions, identify and assess bias and reliability, consider others’ views to inform opinions and decisions, determine success criteria and give some justification for choice. P4C – Feeling empathy. Materials Included in this pack: Activity sheet 7a – Student introduction Activity sheet 7b – Hiroshima before and after the bombing Activity sheet 7c – Detonations of the atomic bombs Activity sheet 7d – The effects of the atomic bombs (Warning: Contains graphic images of survivors of the bombings) Activity sheet 7e – Enola Gay and Bockscar Activity sheet 7f – Statistics Activity sheet 7g – Eyewitness accounts You will also need: Internet access, rope Groupings Whole class, four or five ©Imaginative Minds Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Should America Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb?
    Should America have dropped the Atomic Bomb? Learning outcomes: 1. To describe different viewpoints on the Atomic bomb. 2. To categorise arguments into points for and against the bomb. 3. To judge whether America was justified in dropping the Atomic Bomb. Starter The facts • On August 6, 1945, during World War II (1939-45), an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. • The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people. • Tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure. • Three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people. • Japan’s Emperor Hirohito announced his country’s unconditional surrender in World War II in a radio address on August 15. Summarise the above points into your exercise books. No surrender for Japan • The Allied powers had already defeated Germany in Europe. • Japan, however, vowed to fight to the bitter end in the Pacific, despite clear indications (as early as 1944) that they had little chance of winning. • In fact, between mid-April 1945 (when President Harry Truman took office) and mid-July, Japanese forces inflicted Allied casualties totalling nearly half those suffered in three full years of war in the Pacific, proving that Japan had become even more deadly when faced with defeat. • In late July, Japan’s militarist government rejected the Allied demand for surrender put forth in the Potsdam Declaration, which threatened the Japanese with “prompt and utter destruction” if they refused.
    [Show full text]
  • Sept09frontiers.Pdf
    Frontierswww.boeing.com/frontiers SEPTEMBERAUGUSTJUNE 2009 20092009 / / / Volume VolumeVolume VIII, VIII,VIII, Issue IssueIssue IV VII Space for growth The arrival of Boeing’s newest satellite is opening doors to opportunities in the commercial market SEPTEMBER 2009 / BOEING FRONTIERS BOEING FRONTIERS / SEPTEMBER 2009 / VOLUME VIII, ISSUE V On the Cover 14 New bird Nearly one-third of the approximately 300 commercial satellites in orbit today were built by Boeing at its million- square-foot satellite factory in El Segundo, Calif. The latest model, known as the Boeing 702B, opens the door to many opportunities in the commercial market, where customers are looking for adaptable, medium- power satellites. Four years in development, the 702B from Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems made its debut in July. COVer IMAge: MiKE ConneLLY, Boeing InteLSAT PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OPERATIONS (LEFT), AND MIKE NEUMAN, 702B PROGRAM DIRECTOR, LEAD SPACE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS’ 702B SATELLITE PROGRAM. DANA REIMER/BOEING AND BOB FERGUSON/BOEING PHOTO: SPACECRAFT TECHNICIAN PAUL IM OF BOEING’S EL SEGUNDO, CALIF., SATELLITE FACTORY, ASSEMBLES A BATTERY PANEL USED ON THE 702B. BOB FERGUSON/BOEING BOEING FRONTIERS / SEPTEMBER 2009 / VOLUME VIII, ISSUE V 3 Frontiers Publisher: Tom Downey Table of contents Editorial director: Anne Toulouse EDITORIAL TEAM Executive editor: Paul Proctor: 312-544-2938 Editor: James Wallace: 312-544-2161 Managing editor: Vineta Plume: 312-544-2954 Art director: Brandon Luong: 312-544-2118 24 Commercial Airplanes editor: Julie O’Donnell: 206-766-1329 Super trip in 82 days Engineering, Operations & Technology Earlier this year, a Boeing-led team that included two Super Hornets circled the globe, editor: stopping in a number of countries to perform at air shows and display the jet fighters.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Boy, the Antichristchild. the Beast in the Nuclear
    UTTLE BOY, THE ANTICHRISTCHILD: THE BEAST IN THE NUCLEAR AGE EDDIE TAFO YA University of New México, USA (Resumen) El presente trabajo intenta demostrar cómo el "anticristo" de John Divine está hoy presente en la bomba atómica. La bomba no sólo ha atraido la atención de h'deres y empresas mundiales quienes la cuestionan y se preguntan "¿Quién puede luchar contra ella?" sino que además ejerce un control totalitario sobre el planeta. Al igual que el "corazón" de John, la bomba en un principio devolvió la paz a un mundo caótico, hizo iimumerables promesas y dijo numerosas blasfemias antes de asumir el papel del dios de la era moderna. The Wonum, the Beast and the Voice in the WUdaness In 1964, Robert Mosely stalked, stabbed, raped, and murdered Kitty Genovese on a New York City Street while 38 people listened to her cries and did nothing. Some even puUed chairs up to their windows to watch the horror.' While this is a sad commentary on U.S. culture, it is a paradigm theological moment. It is the Parable of the Good Samaritan transplanted from Luke's Gospel into modern times. On a theological level, the cries were not merely those of Kitty Genovese but the cries of the eternal Other, the person in need. While Christianity smce the time of Constantino has been a tool for the oppressing of gays, women, non-capitalists, and others, there is a persisten! line of thought which advócales that Jesús' message was not as much a matter of orthodoxy as it is a matter of orthopraxies; it is not so much a religión of repentance as it is a religión of divine duty predicated on listening and responding to the voice of the Other.
    [Show full text]