Nagasaki and the Hibakusha Experience of Sumiteru Taniguchi: the Painful Struggles and Ultimate Triumphs of Nagasaki Hibakusha

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nagasaki and the Hibakusha Experience of Sumiteru Taniguchi: the Painful Struggles and Ultimate Triumphs of Nagasaki Hibakusha Volume 18 | Issue 16 | Number 1 | Article ID 5447 | Aug 15, 2020 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Nagasaki and the Hibakusha Experience of Sumiteru Taniguchi: The Painful Struggles and Ultimate Triumphs of Nagasaki Hibakusha Sumiteru Taniguchi Introduction by Peter J. Kuznick Abstract: Sumiteru Taniguchi was one of the Many of the more than 250,000 who lived in “lucky” ones. He lived a long and productive Nagasaki on August 9, 1945 were not so lucky. life. He married and fathered two healthy Tens of thousands were killed instantly by the children who gave him four grandchildren and plutonium core atomic bomb the U.S. dropped two great grandchildren. He had a long career that day from the B29 Bockscar, captained by in Japan’s postal and telegraph services. As a Major Charles Sweeney. The bomb, nicknamed leader in Japan’s anti-nuclear movement, he “Fat Man,” exploded with a force equivalent to addressed thousands of audiences and21 kilotons of TNT and wiped out an area that covered three square miles, shattering hundreds of thousands of people. Many of the windows eleven miles away. Some 74,000 were more than 250,000 who lived in Nagasaki on dead by the end of the year. The death toll August 9, 1945 were not so lucky. reached 140,000 by 1950. Included among the victims were thousands of Korean slave Keywords: Nagasaki, atomic bomb, hibakusha, laborers, who toiled in Japanese mines, fields, Sumiteru Taniguchi, the atomic decision and factories. Since then, atomic bomb-related injuries and illnesses have claimed thousands more victims and caused immense suffering to Sumiteru Taniguchi was one of the “lucky” many of the survivors. ones. He lived a long and productive life. He The scene of death and destruction defied married and fathered two healthy children. He description. Corpses, many of which had been had a long career in Japan’s postal and charred by the blast, lay everywhere. Susan telegraph services. As a leader in Japan’s anti- Southard, in her groundbreaking book nuclear movement, he addressed thousands of Nagasaki: Life After Nuclear War, describes audiences and hundreds of thousands of the scene that U.S. occupation troops people. He traveled to at least 23 countries. encountered when they landed on September The organizations in which he played a23, 1945: “The Urakami Valley had vanished prominent role were nominated several times from existence, corpses were burning on for the Nobel Peace Prize. cremation pyres, skulls and bones were piled 1 18 | 16 | 1 APJ | JF on the ground, and people were walking Enemy Situation.” The section on the through the ruins with beleaguered and empty “Possibility of Surrender” clearly stated: expressions.” Among the troops was Keith Lynch, a sailor from Nebraska. Lynch wrote to his parents that he had just seen “a sight I hope The Japanese ruling groups are aware of my children, if I am so fortunate, will never the desperate military situation and are have to see, hear of, or ever think of. It was increasingly desirous of a compromise horrible and when you get to thinking, peace, but still find unconditional unbelievable…. Such a thing as I saw yesterday surrender unacceptable….a considerable cannot be described in words. You have to see portion of the Japanese population now it and I hope no one ever has to see such a consider absolute military defeat to be thing again.” probable….An entry of the Soviet Union into the war would finally convince the The death toll was even higher and the Japanese of the inevitability of complete destruction greater in Hiroshima, which the defeat. U.S. had obliterated three days earlier with a uranium core atomic bomb. There, some 200,000 were dead by 1950. The Nagasaki Truman recognized the growing desperation of bomb was more powerful than the one that Japanese leaders, whose citizens were leveled Hiroshima, but damage was limited by becoming increasingly demoralized. The U.S. the fact that the bomb missed its target and had firebombed and largely destroyed more that the mountains surrounding Nagasaki, than 100 Japanese cities, leaving millions which is located in a valley, contained the blast. homeless. With the food supply shrinking and However, in Urakami Valley, the center of the transportation system in tatters, starvation Nagasaki’s Christian population, where the loomed. Energy supplies had run so low that bomb landed, nearly 70 percent of thenew Japanese pilots could barely undertake the population perished. training flights needed to prepare for battle. U.S. forces had decimated Japan’s air force and Questions about the atomic bombings have navy. And, as the July 6 report indicated, persisted ever since those fateful days in Japanese leaders were looking for a way out August 1945. Renowned journalist Edward R. and American leaders knew it. Truman Murrow asked President Truman in a 1958 described the intercepted July 18 cable television interview, “When the bomb was between officials in Tokyo and Moscow as “the dropped, the war was near to ending anyway. telegram from the Jap emperor asking for Was this the result of a miscalculation of the peace.” Based on other recently intercepted Japanese potential? Was our intelligence faulty cables, his close advisors concurred. They knew in this area?” Truman correctly denied that he that giving the Japanese assurances that they had miscalculated or that the intelligence had could keep the emperor, thereby easing been faulty. He knew exactly what he was Japanese fears that the emperor would be tried doing. For months, in fact, Allied intelligence as a war criminal and possibly executed, would had been accurately reporting Japan’s growing likely bring surrender. Secretary of War Henry desire to quit and the fact that there were Stimson pushed Truman and Secretary of State alternatives to using atomic bombs to end the James Byrnes to drop the demand for war. On July 6, 1945, in preparation for the unconditional surrender and inform the Potsdam Conference, the CombinedJapanese that the emperor could stay. Most of Intelligence Committee of the Combined Chiefs Truman’s top military and civilian advisors of Staff issued a top secret “Estimate of the joined Stimson in that endeavor. General 2 18 | 16 | 1 APJ | JF Douglas MacArthur, Southwest PacificAtomic Bomb and the Apocalyptic Narrative” Supreme Commander, later declared, perhaps The Asia-Pacific Journal July 12, 2007.) Many somewhat overoptimistically, that the Japanese scientists knew he wasn’t exaggerating. would have happily surrendered in May if U.S. Physicist Edward Teller had been pushing for leaders had changed the surrender terms. He immediate development of hydrogen bombs for later told former President Herbert Hoover that years. Fellow Hungarian Leo Szilard warned if Truman had acted on Hoover’s “wise and that the destructive force in such bombs could statesmanlike” memo of May 30, 1945be almost unlimited in size. Los Alamos advocating changing the surrender terms, it scientific director J. Robert Oppenheimer had “would have obviated the slaughter atearlier warned top government and military Hiroshima and Nagasaki in addition to much of leaders that within three years the U.S. would the destruction …by our bomber attacks. That likely have weapons between 700 and 7,000 the Japanese would have accepted it and gladly times as powerful as the relatively primitive I have no doubt.” bomb that would flatten Hiroshima. In less than a decade, scientists were indeed testifying But that was not the only way to induce before Congress about the feasibility of surrender without use of the atomic bombs. developing a thermonuclear explosive with the U.S. leaders could also have waited for the power of 700,000 Hiroshima bombs. Insanity Soviets to declare war against Japan and begin was the order of the day. As Lewis Mumford the invasion of Japanese-occupied territories wrote, “madmen,” calmly, rationally planning and perhaps Japan itself. The U.S. had pressed annihilation, had seized the levers of power. As repeatedly for Soviet involvement and, at Yalta Sumiteru Taniguchi understood, they have not in February 1945, Stalin had finally agreed to relinquished it since. invade three months after the end of the war in Europe. Truman was confident that this would The question that plagues many historians is do the trick. When he got Stalin’s confirmation not whether the bombs needed to be used to at Potsdam that the Soviets were coming in, he prevent an invasion that was not even wrote in his diary on July 17, “He’ll be in the scheduled to begin for another three months Jap War on August 15. Fini Japs when that against a foe that had clearly been defeated. comes about.” He wrote to his wife the next Obviously, they did not. Seven of America’s day, exulting, “We’ll end the war a year sooner eight five star officers in 1945 are on record now, and think of the kids who won’t be saying as much. Admiral William D. Leahy, killed!” Truman’s personal Chief of Staff, said that in using the atomic bombs, the U.S. “adopted an But Truman’s responsibility goes beyond ethical standard common to the barbarians of slaughtering innocent civilians. Makingthe dark ages.” Even the National Museum of Truman’s actions totally indefensible was the the U.S. Navy in Washington, DC acknowledges fact that Truman knew that he was beginning a that the vast death and destruction wreaked by process that could end all life on the planet and atomic bombings “made little impact on the said so on at least three occasions. While at Japanese military. However, the Soviet invasion Potsdam, most famously, he reacted to an in- of Manchuria…changed their minds.” The depth briefing on the incredible power of the question is not whether the atomic bombs were Alamogordo bomb test by shuddering, “It may militarily or morally justifiable—they clearly be the fire destruction prophesied in the were not.
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear War: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and a Workable Moral Strategy for Achieving and Preserving World Peace
    2018 Canadian Peace Research Association (CPRA) Conference, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, May 30 - June 1, 2018 Nuclear War: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and A Workable Moral Strategy for Achieving and Preserving World Peace Raymond G. Wilson* Illinois Wesleyan University Caution: This document graphically reveals what happens to people caught one mile away from a small primitive nuclear weapon . Why world peace is necessary That Day: Monday, August 6, 1945, 8:15 AM : In the center of Hiroshima, just above Shima Hospital, it seemed like the sun had descended to the earth, followed by the sky blasting down like a Richter-10 cosmic quake from the gods, “rattling the earth’s axis,” scorching, searing, roasting, irradiating, blasting, and crushing everything and everyone below. It was as if the sun touched Hiroshima, creating a blazing inferno with no escape; hell was overflowing down onto the city; neutron radiation from the bomb made people’s bones radioactive (radio-chemical warfare ). Blast winds in excess of 200 miles per hour (mph), with blast overpressure blowing out ear drums and forcing eyeballs out of their sockets (like globe luxation ); it hurled and slammed people into stone walls. Scorched blistered skin sloughed and peeled off their bodies, dragging on the ground as they tried to escape the city. The retinas of eyes looking up were burned. Stone and concrete buildings were fire-gutted to their cores, the blast-shattered glass window fragments sharply tearing into the bodies of those within, and without. This happened to Hiroshima citizens, the children and families, within seconds on August 6. Birds and butterflies never had a chance.
    [Show full text]
  • This Defend Life Newsletter
    Promoting the Culture of Life and Fighting the Culture of Death since 1987 CATHOLIC • PRO-LIFE • PRO-FAMILY July - August 2011, Vol. 22 No. 4, Circ. 4164 www.defendlife.org • [email protected] Voice Mail: (410) 296-LIVE • Pro-Life Action News: (410) 296-BORN Tour takes the truth to the streets and the President Jack Ames knew something was up when, driving up to the Face the Truth Tour stop on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C., July 26, he saw a couple of Secret Service cars parked on the wrong side of the street. “Then some limousines pulled up in front of the Norwegian Embassy,” recalled the Defend Life director. “I saw the Secret Service men unloading these huge, 6-foot-long Tommy guns. Then here comes the presidential motorcade up Massa- chusetts Avenue: motorcycles, lim- ousines, a van, an ambulance.” The motorcade passed pro-lifers holding graphic signs of aborted ba- bies before turning right onto 34th Photo by Peter Shinn, Pro-Life Unity Street, to the side entrance of the Jack Ames (left) and Maggie Egger wave to the Presidential motorcade Norwegian embassy. as it leaves the Norwegian embassy in Washington, D.C. President Obama had come to deliver a speech in memory of the saw the huge photos of babies killed WFRD in Frederick, Fox 45 in Bal- Norwegians killed in the July 22 ter- by abortion as Defend Life’s eleventh timore, a great article in the Bel Air rorist attack. Annual Face the Truth Tour swept Aegis, and others.” Later, when the President left across Maryland, making 15 stops Motorists throughout the tour the embassy in his motorcade, “We along streets and highways from July responded to pro-lifers’ “Honk for had two ‘Choice’ signs; I was hold- 25-29.
    [Show full text]
  • 606 Atomic Bomb Suffering and Chernobyl Accident Lessons Learnt from International Medical Aid Programs
    JAERI-Conf 2005-001 606 Atomic Bomb Suffering and Chernobyl Accident Lessons learnt from International Medical Aid Programs Shunichi YAMASHITA* Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan T8528523 SitTffK^ 1-12-4, E-mail: [email protected] mm 3 hj ^- * Current position; Scientist at the Department of Radiation Program, Sustainable Development and Healthy Environment, WHO/HQ in Geneva, [email protected] - 387 - JAERI-Conf 2005-001 Abstract The cooperative medical projects between Nagasaki University and countries of the former USSR have had being performed in mainly two regions: Chernobyl and Semipalatinsk since 1990 and 1995, respectively. The 21st Center of Excellence (COE) program of "International Consortium for Medical Care of Hibakusha and Radiation Life Science" recently established in Nagasaki University can now serve our knowledge and experience much more directly. Its activity can be further extended to the radiocontaminated areas around the world, and based on the lessons of the past, it can indeed contribute to the future planning of the Network of Excellence (NOE) for Radiation Education Program as well as Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness and Assistance under the auspices of the WHO-REMPAN. Within the frame of International Consortium of Radiation Research, a molecular epidemiology of thyroid diseases are now conducted in our departments in addition to international medical assistance. The clue of radiation-associated thyroid carcinogenesis may give us a new concept on experimental and epidemiological approaches to low dose radiation effects on human health, including those of internal radiation exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT of the International Peoples' Tribunal on the Dropping
    JUDGEMENT Of The International Peoples' Tribunal On the Dropping of Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and Nagasaki July 16, 2007 Judges Lennox S. Hinds Carlos Vargas IE Masaji Prosecutors Mr. ADACHI Shuichi Mr. INOUE Masanobu Ms. SHIMONAKA Nami Mr. AKIMOTO Masahiro Mr. CHE Bong Tae Amicus Curiae Mr. OHKUBO Kenichi 1 PLAINTIFFS A-Bomb Survivors Citizens of Hiroshima Citizens of Nagasaki Any Other Supporters of A-Bomb Survivors DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA US. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt U.S. President, Harry S. Truman James F. Byrnes, Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of War George C. Marshall, Army Chief of Staff Thomas T. Handy, Army Acting Chief of Staff Henrry H. Arnold, Commander of the Army Air Forces Carl A. Spaatz, Commander of the US Strategic Air Force Curtis E. LeMay, Commander of the 20th Bomber Command Paul W. Tibbets, Pilot of B-29 “Enola Gay” William S. Parsons, Weaponeer of B-29 “Enola Gay” Charles W. Sweeny, Pilot of B-29 “Book s Car” Frederick L. Ashworth, Weaponeer of B-29 “Bocks Car” Leslie R. Groves, Head of the Manhattan Project J. Robert Oppenheimer, Director of the Los Alamos Laboratory REGISTRY TSUBOI Sunao, SASAKI Takeya, TANAKA Yuki, FUNAHASHI Yoshie YOKOHARA Yukio, TOSHIMOTO Katsumi, OKUHARA Hiromi KUNO Naruaki, HINADA Seishi 2 A: Universal Jurisdiction of the Court 1. In accordance with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Charter of the International Peoples' Tribunal on the Dropping of Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Tribunal has jurisdiction over crimes committed against the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the victims of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9, 1945, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads of Technical Information
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Nuclear Spaces: Simulations of Nuclear Warfare in Film, by the Numbers, and on the Atomic Battlefield Donald J. Kinney Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NUCLEAR SPACES: SIMULATIONS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE IN FILM, BY THE NUMBERS, AND ON THE ATOMIC BATTLEFIELD By DONALD J KINNEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Donald J. Kinney defended this dissertation on October 15, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Dissertation Joseph R. Hellweg University Representative Jonathan A. Grant Committee Member Kristine C. Harper Committee Member Guenter Kurt Piehler Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Morgan, Nala, Sebastian, Eliza, John, James, and Annette, who all took their turns on watch as I worked. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Kris Harper, Jonathan Grant, Kurt Piehler, and Joseph Hellweg. I would especially like to thank Ron Doel, without whom none of this would have been possible. It has been a very long road since that afternoon in Powell's City of Books, but Ron made certain that I did not despair. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinian: Not Just an Island in the Pacific
    TINIAN: NOT JUST AN ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC It is a small island, less than 40 square miles, a flat green dot in the vastness of Pacific blue. Fly over it and you notice a slash across its north end of uninhabited bush, a long thin line that looks like an overgrown dirt runway. If you didn't know what it was, you wouldn't give it a second glance out your airplane window. On the ground, you see the runway isn't dirt but tarmac and crushed limestone, abandoned with weeds sticking out of it. Yet this is arguably the most historical airstrip on earth. This is where World War II was won. This is Runway Able On July 24, 1944, 30,000 US Marines landed on the beaches of Tinian. Eight days later, over 8,000 of the 8,800 Japanese soldiers on the island were dead (vs. 328 Marines), and four months later the Seabees had built the busiest airfield of WWII - dubbed North Field – enabling B-29 Superfortresses to launch air attacks on the Philippines, Okinawa, and mainland Japan. Late in the afternoon of August 5, 1945, a B-29 was maneuvered over a bomb loading pit, then after lengthy preparations, taxied to the east end of North Field's main runway, Runway Able, and at 2:45am in the early morning darkness of August 6, took off. The B-29 was piloted by Col. Paul Tibbets of the US Army Air Force, who had named the plane after his mother, Enola Gay. The crew named the bomb they were carrying Little Boy.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge and Power in Occupied Japan: U.S. Censorship of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2018 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2018 Knowledge and Power in Occupied Japan: U.S. Censorship of Hiroshima and Nagasaki May E. Grzybowski Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018 Part of the Asian History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Grzybowski, May E., "Knowledge and Power in Occupied Japan: U.S. Censorship of Hiroshima and Nagasaki" (2018). Senior Projects Spring 2018. 134. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018/134 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Knowledge and Power in Occupied Japan: U.S. Censorship of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Senior Project Submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College by May Grzybowski Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2018 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter One: Censorship Under SCAP………………………………………………………………..5 Chapter Two: Censored Texts…………………………………………………………..……….…....20 Chapter Three: Effects of Censorship………………………………………………………………...52 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………….66 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………...……69 Acknowledgements I would not have been able to finish this project without the support of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Should America Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb?
    Should America have dropped the Atomic Bomb? Learning outcomes: 1. To describe different viewpoints on the Atomic bomb. 2. To categorise arguments into points for and against the bomb. 3. To judge whether America was justified in dropping the Atomic Bomb. Starter The facts • On August 6, 1945, during World War II (1939-45), an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. • The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people. • Tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure. • Three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people. • Japan’s Emperor Hirohito announced his country’s unconditional surrender in World War II in a radio address on August 15. Summarise the above points into your exercise books. No surrender for Japan • The Allied powers had already defeated Germany in Europe. • Japan, however, vowed to fight to the bitter end in the Pacific, despite clear indications (as early as 1944) that they had little chance of winning. • In fact, between mid-April 1945 (when President Harry Truman took office) and mid-July, Japanese forces inflicted Allied casualties totalling nearly half those suffered in three full years of war in the Pacific, proving that Japan had become even more deadly when faced with defeat. • In late July, Japan’s militarist government rejected the Allied demand for surrender put forth in the Potsdam Declaration, which threatened the Japanese with “prompt and utter destruction” if they refused.
    [Show full text]
  • Orientalia Parthenopea
    ISBN 978-88-97000-26-6 ISSN 1972-3598 Orientalia Parthenopea XVII [2017] a cura di Giovanni Borriello Orientalia Parthenopea Edizioni Veronica De Pieri Kintsugi identities in the post-catastrophe Japan: the hibakusha in the post-1954 and post-2011 literature Introduction Kintsugi (金継ぎ) refers to a Japanese term to identify the ancient art of repairing broken pottery using lacquer mixed up with powdered gold, silver or platinum. The result that comes up is a new artefact whose beauty resides precisely in the emphasis given to its injuries. The surface of the manufacture is crossed by gold and silver ribs, proudly sparkling like a knight who fiercely shows his wounds. A philosophical message is steeped into those shining ribs: past might have hurt you, but it is part of you and it is exactly what makes you precious. In contemporary Japan kintsugi represents a metaphor to reveal the fragmented nature of Japanese society. Although six years have already passed from the nuclear fallout occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (原発), Japanese national identity still appears disjointed and its open scars reflect the unsolved problems the mismanagement at the Power Plant caused. Japanese people, who always have appeared to be unanimous in face of a catastrophic event, turned to be split up in multiple small groups: the evacuees at the refugee camps are still seeking aids from the Japanese government; the workers at the Fukushima Daiichi are still fighting to obtain justice for the violation of any occupational safety regulations by TEPCO; the collective burials have swept 212 Veronica De Pieri away the identity of those injured to death by the tsunamis and survivors are still struggle to restore those lives, in order to not let them fell into oblivion.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History
    3 ASIAN HISTORY Porter & Porter and the American Occupation II War World on Reflections Japanese Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The Asian History series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hägerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Members Roger Greatrex, Lund University Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University David Henley, Leiden University Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: 1938 Propaganda poster “Good Friends in Three Countries” celebrating the Anti-Comintern Pact Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 259 8 e-isbn 978 90 4853 263 6 doi 10.5117/9789462982598 nur 692 © Edgar A. Porter & Ran Ying Porter / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Longer Extract from a Song for Nagasaki
    A Song for Nagasaki by Paul Glynn, Marist Fathers books, Hunters hill, NSW, 1988, 168pp. I will forever be grateful for the frienD who sent me this book. It is one of the most influential books in my life, anD I maDe more marks anD unDerlining in it than in any other book I have ever reaD. Here I met one of the worlD’s great Peacemakers: Doctor Takashi Nagai (“The well that lasts”). Nagai belongeD to a Japanese meDical family committeD to the Shinto faith. However by the time he graDuated from high school he was a convinced atheist. An avid reader, he studied at Nagasaki meDical University, graDuating in 1932. The scientific rationalism at university strengtheneD his unbelief. He was most annoyeD by a sense of the crassness of ‘foreign gods’ being worshipped in the Cathedral at Urakami, a suburb of Nagasaki. Nagai’s passion was science; he believeD it held the key to every door that barred human progress. He also loveD Japanese poems from the seventh anD eighth century CE. This helpeD keep him sensitive to the Japanese iDeographs (symbols useD in writing systems to represent concepts), which he read each day, and which kept him aware of the importance of feelings and intuition. At high school Nagai had read in Pascal’s Pensees and pondered much his thought: “man is a thinking reeD”. At university he came across Pascal as the inventor of the syringe anD the barometer. So he continued to stuDy the Pensees, aware that it was written by that rare combination of scientist anD mystic.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Fukushima
    Comment Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Fukushima 1–3 In this issue of The Lancet, three Series papers and shaped current health management practices and the See Editorial page 403 a Viewpoint4 commemorate 70 years of caring for institutions that run them, as well as public responses See Comment page 407 survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and to these events. The contexts of 1945 and 2011 are See Series pages 469, 479, and 489 Nagasaki, as well as the more recent extension of clearly very diff erent, and intervening events have See Viewpoint page 498 that care to those aff ected by the Fukushima nuclear also shaped current discourse about Fukushima. The accident. As a result of this unwelcome triple legacy, post-war introduction of nuclear energy to Japan was Japan has become a uniquely important site for initially distant from medical discussion, given Cold understanding radiation-related health eff ects1 and the War concerns with nuclear weaponry. During this time aftermath and eff ects of nuclear accidents.2,3 As the From attitudes were also infl uenced by the Lucky Dragon Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Fukushima Series makes incident of 1954—when Japanese fi shermen aboard clear, the three Japanese locations are linked by more the Daigo Fukuryu Maru (Lucky Dragon) were aff ected by than tragedy. The events of 1945 shaped institutions a US hydrogen bomb test at Bikini Atoll—from which and research programmes that came to play a major Japanese antinuclear activism can be dated.7 A series part in Fukushima prefecture 66 years later. of large industrial pollution incidents in the 1950s and 70 years after the end of World War 2, the monitoring of 1960s, along with the subsequent occurrence of small Japanese atomic bomb survivors, known as hibakusha, for nuclear plant accidents, have also kept the spectre radiation-related health problems continues.
    [Show full text]