92 on the Principal Constructions Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

92 on the Principal Constructions Of 92 ON THE PRINCIPAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF BREECH -LOADING MECHANISM FOR SMALL ARMS, AND THEIR RELATIVE. MECHANICAL ADVANTAGES. BY MR. WILLIAM P. MARSHALL. The general adoption of Breech-Loading Small Aims that has now taken place has caused a number of mechanical contrivances to be brought out, of great ingenuity and interest, for overcoming the difficulties met with in obtaining a satisfactory breech-loading action. The objects to be effected are-lst, to open the breech of the gun and close it again rapidly and securely by a simple and convenient movement, without removing the hand far from the trigger, and without shifting the hold of the gun by the other hand ; %id, to extract the empty cartridge-case of the previous charge by the same movement as that which opens the breech, so as to present the open barrel ready for instant re-loading; and 3rd, to have the whole mechanism of a simple, strong, and durable character, free from risk of derangement either by accident, long wear and tear, rough usage in active service, exposure to wet or sand, or fouling from long continued firing. In the case of military guns the latter requirements are of special importance, as the whole value of a breech-loading gun in increased rapidity of fire would be outweighed by any increased liability to failure in action. When the formidable and conflicting Tharacter of these requirements is considered, it will be seen how much mechanical credit is involved in the very complete and successful manner in which they have now been met. Breech-loading guns were first adopted by the Prussian army, in which the celebrated Needle-gun has now been in use for more than twenty years, and for many years has been the universal arm there used ; but the introduction of the principle into other countries is only of recent date, and in this country, although breech-loaders BREECH-LOADING RIFLES. 93 have for fourteen years been in use to a limited extent for the cavalry carbines, it is only within the last five years that the principle has been adopted for the army generally. In the case of the cavalry carbines, breech-loading was adopted solely for the purpose of overcoming the difficulty of loading whilst on horseback the muzzle-loading rifles then in general use for the army, in which the charge had to be driven home by the ramrod in loading. The breech-loading action then adopted for the purpose was required by the military authorities to fire a paper cartridge, ignited by the ordinary percussion cap, which had to be put on for each charge, involving the consequent loss of time and inconvenience in loading. A great objection was felt at that time by the military authorities of this country to any considerable increase in the facility for rapidity of fire, on the ground of a supposed risk of ammunition being wasted by too rapid firing before the men came within effective range, leaving them then unduly short of ammunition. The extension of breech-loaders for military purposes was consequently checked in this country for many years, although the principle came into universal use for sporting purposes on account of the great advantages experienced in convenience of loading and rapidity of fire. But the continued experience of the Prussian needle-gun proved conclusively that the objection of risk of wasting ammunition had no real foundation, and that with men properly trained to the use of breech-loaders there was no more risk of ammunition being wasted with them than with any other gun ; whilst on the other hand the overpowering command given by the great increase in rapidity of fire made it a case of simple necessity for all other troops to be armed also with breech-loaders, in order to prevent their being placed under a heavy disadvantage. With the use of breech-loaders it has been found that each man is enabled to fire about ten shots whilst advancing from 400 yards to 200 yards range, each shot being fired with defi,nite aim from the knee, and 45 per cent. of the shots hitting a target of 6 feet height and 2 feet width. Troops armed with muzzle-loaders would be at a heavy disadvantage opposed to {ucha force j and the great power of defence given by breech-loaders tgainst approaching cavalry renders an attack impracticable on open 94 BREECH-LOADING RIFLES. grouud, the infantry being enabled to fire as many as twelve volleys during the time of the cavalry approaching after having come within range. Several distinct principles of action have been followed in the different constructions of breech-loading mechanism, the main object in each being to provide the means of rapidly opening the breech and loading the gun, and then closing the breech again so as to resist securely the force of the explosion in firing. The first principle tried was that of the celebrated Prussian 'Needle-gun, shown in Figs. 1to 6, Plates 21 and 22, in which the breech is opened by drawing back a bolt B in a line with the barrel, and the front end of the bolt forms a conical cup that closes the breech, when pressed home by turning the handle of the bolt down on one side into an inclined catch. The explosion of the cartridge C is effected by a steel needle N, Fig. 1, which is driven forwards by a spiral spring, and piercing the base of the paper cartridge passes through the powder, and st,rikes the fulminate inside a cap situated within the cartridge and immediately behind the bullet, as shown in Fig. 3. The base of the bullet is fitted into a sabot made of compressed paper, which is forced into the grooves of the ri%e by the discharge, and causes the bullet to rotate with it. The spiral spring and needle-carrier A are contained in a tube D which slides within another longitudinal tube B ; and this outer tube has also an independent longitudinal sliding movement, and forms a long bolt with a knob handle projecting at the side, as in Figs. 1to 4. The first action in loading the gun is to withdraw the needle from the barrel by means of the thumb-piece E in the rear of the lock, as shown in Fig. 1, pressing at the same time on tt spring-catch F, which requires releasing to allow of the withdrawal. The second action is to draw back the bolt B, carrying the needle and spring within it, as in Figs. 1 and 2, thus opening the breech; the bolt handle is first struck upwards into the position shown in Fig. 2, so as to release it from the side catch into which it fits when the breech is closed. The third action is to insert a fresh cartridge into the barrel through the opened breech, as in Fig. 1. The fourth action is to close the BREECH-LOADINQ RIFLES. 95 breech again, by pushing the bolt forwards into its first position, as in Fig. 5, turning the handle down sideways to lock the bolt, as in Fig. 4. The fifth action is cocking the gun by pushing in the end thumb-piece E to its original position, as in Fig. 6, in which it is then retained by the spring-catch F; this compresses the spiral spring, as the shoulder on the needle-holder A is held fast by the trigger-catch I, which allows it to pass backwards when the sliding bolt B is withdrawn, as in Fig. 1, but catches and detains the needle-holder when the bolt is pushed forwards again for closing the breech, as in Figs. 5 and 6. The end thumb-piece E, when pushed forwards for cocking the gun, enters a slot in the back end of the sliding bolt, as in Fig. 6, and holds it from turning, thus preventing any possibility of the breech being opened while the gun remains cocked. The sixth action is firing the gun by pulling the trigger T, which releases the needle-holder A and allows it to be driven forwards by the compressed spring, as in Fig. 3. This Needle-gun was invented in an imperfect form more than forty years since by J. N. Dreyse, a gunmaker of Somerda in Prussia; and after a long series of experiments with the aid of the Prussian government it was brought to its present form, and has been adopted generally for the Prussian army for the last twenty years. At the commencement of that period the arm generally in use in this country and elsewhere was the old smooth-bore musket, until the invention shortly afterwards of the Mini6 expanding bullet, which allowed of the general use of rifled barrels for muzzle-loaders. In the Prussian needle-gun the means of closing the breech so as to prevent the escape of gas backwards from the barrel at the moment of firing is by a conical cup at the front end of the sliding bolt, which fits over a corresponding conical end of the barrel, as shown at G in Figs. 3 and 5, and is forced into close contact by the slightly inclined face of the catch into which the handle of the bolt is pressed when turned down sideways, as in Fig. 4. In practice however it is found that this joint is not sufficiently tight tfo prevent the occurrence of a ‘‘ spitting ” or escape of gas into the face of the firer, which becomes inconveniently great after a long continued use of the gun.
Recommended publications
  • 1.0 Firearms History
    1.0 Firearms History 1.0.1 Introduction While a history of firearms should start with the earliest of hand cannons, progressing through the It may seem that a history of firearms is an illogical wheel lock, miquelet and so on. For this book, way to begin this book, but any competent forensic however, it will start at the flintlock, as it is unlikely firearms examiner needs to have a good working that anything earlier would be encountered in every- knowledge of this subject matter. As such, it should day case work. A much more comprehensive history form part of the court qualification process at the of firearms is offered in Appendix 4. beginning of any trial. Having said that, though, it would be unreasonable to expect a firearms examiner with many years’ experience to be able to give, for 1.0.2 The flintlock (Figure 1.0.1) example, a precise date for the introduction of the Anson and Deeley push button fore-end. Such an The flintlock ignition system really signalled the esoteric piece of firearms history may have formed advent of an easy-to-use firearm with a simple part of the examiner’s training many years ago, but mechanism for the discharge of a missile via a unless s/he had a particular interest in shotgun powdered propellant. In this type of weapon, the history it would be unlikely that s/he would remem- propellant was ignited via a spark produced by ber little other than an approximate date or period. striking a piece of flint against a steel plate.
    [Show full text]
  • International Military Cartridge Rifles and Bayonets
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY CARTRIDGE RIFLES AND BAYONETS The following table lists the most common international military rifles, their chambering, along with the most common bayonet types used with each. This list is not exhaustive, but is intended as a quick reference that covers the types most commonly encountered by today’s collectors. A Note Regarding Nomenclature: The blade configuration is listed, in parentheses, following the type. There is no precise dividing line between what blade length constitutes a knife bayonet vs. a sword bayonet. Blades 10-inches or shorter are typically considered knife bayonets. Blades over 12-inches are typically considered sword bayonets. Within the 10-12 inch range, terms are not consistently applied. For purposes of this chart, I have designated any blade over 12 inches as a sword bayonet. Country Rifle Cartridge Bayonet (type) Argentina M1879 Remington 11.15 x 58R Spanish M1879 (sword) Rolling-Block M1888 Commission 8 x 57 mm. M1871 (sword) Rifle M1871/84 (knife) M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1891 (sword) M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. None Cavalry Carbine M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1891/22 (knife) Engineer Carbine [modified M1879] M1891/22 (knife) [new made] M1909 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1909 First Pattern (sword) M1909 Second Pattern (sword) M1909/47 (sword) M1909 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1909 Second Cavalry Carbine Pattern (sword) M1909/47 (sword) FN Model 1949 7.65 x 53 mm. FN Model 1949 (knife) FN-FAL 7.62 mm. NATO FAL Type A (knife) FAL Type C (socket) © Ralph E. Cobb 2007 all rights reserved Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Wood, Christopher Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Original Citation Wood, Christopher (2013) Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/19501/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Were the developments in 19th century small
    [Show full text]
  • Future of War in Its Technical Economic and Political Relations
    The FUTURE OF WAR IN ITS TECHNICAL ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RELATIONS BY JEAN DE BLOCK TRANSLATED BY R. C. LONG, AND WITH A CONVERSATION WITH THE AUTHOR BY W. T. STEAD, AND AN INTRODUCTION BY EDWIN D. MEAD BOSTON THE WORLD PEACE FOUNDATION 1914 COPYRIGHT, i899, BY DOUBLEDAY & McCLURE CO. 514.10 tgfre fltfrcnaeum $£*** GINN & COMPANY~*PRO. PRIETORS . BOSTON • U.S.A. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION, BY EDWIN D. MEAD. CONVERSATIONS WITH THE AUTHOR, BY W. T. STEAD vii AUTHOR'S PREFACE . biiii PART I MILITARY AND NAVAL DEVELOPMENTS CHAP. PAGE I. How WAR WILL BE WAGED ON LAND . 3 II. PLANS OF CAMPAIGN : POSSIBLE AND IMPOSSIBLE 63 III. THE FUTURE OF NAVAL WARFARE. 93 IV. DOES RUSSIA NEED A NAVY? . 113 V. WHAT WARS HAVE COST IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY 128 "g VI. WHAT THEY WILL COST IN THE FUTURE . 140 <D § VII. THE CARE OF THE WOUNDED ... 146 CD CONTENTS PART II ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES IN TIME OF WAR CHAP. PAGE I. IN RUSSIA . „ .163 II. IN BRITAIN . 0 . .251 III. IN GERMANY 266 IV. IN FRANCE 277 V. EFFECT OF WAR ON THE VITAL NEEDS OF PEOPLES 294 VI. PROBABLE LOSSES IN FUTURE WARS . 319 VII. MILITARISM AND ITS NEMESIS . ­ 347 LIST OF MAPS AND DIAGRAMS Map of Russian Defensive System . 74 Map of Paths of Advance of the Austro-German Armies from Points of Concentration to the Vistula-Bug-Narev Theatre of War 77 Map of Paths of Advance of the German and Austrian Armies on the Vistula-Bug-Narev Theatre of War, from Pierron and Brailmont . 78 Plan of Invasion by Russia of Prussian Territory .
    [Show full text]
  • On Groundbreaking Innovations in Weapons Technology and the Long Wave
    On groundbreaking innovations in weapons technology and the long wave DISSERTATION of the University of St. Gallen, School of Management, Economics, Law, Social Sciences and International Affairs to obtain the title of Doctor of Philosophy in Management submitted by Johannes Gerhard from Germany Approved on the application of Prof. Dr. Rainer Metz and Prof. Dr. Martin Hilb Dissertation no. 4769 Joh. Wagner & Söhne, Frankfurt, 2019 The University of St. Gallen, School of Management, Economics, Law, Social Sciences and International Affairs hereby consents to the printing of the present dissertation, without hereby expressing any opinion on the views herein expressed. St. Gallen, May, 22, 2018 The President: Prof. Dr. Thomas Bieger Dedicated to Nikolai Kondratieff I thank Professor Metz as well as Professor Hilb for their support and patience. Table of contents Table of contents I Table of figures VIII List of tables IX Table of abbreviations X Abstract XI Zusammenfassung XIII 1. Introductory part 1 1.1. Meaning for research and practice 3 1.1.1. Meaning for research 3 1.1.2. Meaning for practice 4 1.2. Objective 5 1.3. Procedure 5 2. General theoretical part 7 2.1. Theories related to the topic of this dissertation 9 2.1.1. Time frame of this dissertation and countries under analysis 9 2.1.2. The Kondratieff cycle 10 2.1.2.1. Predecessors and the meaning of Nikolai Kondratieff 10 2.1.2.2. The work of Nikolai Kondratieff 11 2.1.2.3. Critique regarding Kondratieff‟s work 11 2.1.2.4. Long waves in rolling returns of the S&P 500 from 1789 to 2017 13 2.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Military During 1870
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1964 The rF ench military during 1870,: in light of the tradition and strategy of Napoleon Bonaparte. Robert Fernand Forest University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Forest, Robert Fernand, "The rF ench military during 1870,: in light of the tradition and strategy of Napoleon Bonaparte." (1964). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1519. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1519 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIVE COLLEGE DEPOSITORY THE FRENCH MILITARY DURING 1870 IN LIGHT OF THE TRADITION AND STRiVTEGY OF NAPOLEON 30NAPi\RTE by Robert F. Forest B.S.E. Westfield State College M.Ed. University of Massachusetts Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. University of Massachusetts, Amherst May, 1964 In the preparation of this paper, I am indebted to my wife, Barbara, for her patience and assistance and to Paul A, Gagnon, whose guidance and suggestions were indispensable for the completion of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. NAPOLEONIC ARMIES ... ' • »••• 3 III. CHANGES FROM NaPOLEON I TO 1870 13 Changes in Prussia 13 Material and Technological Developments ....oo,. •••• 20 Changes in French Military Doctrine Before 1851 26 Changes During the Second Empire , 32 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplying an Army Prussian and German Military Planning and the Concept of Force Multiplication in Three Conflicts by Samuel A
    Multiplying an Army Prussian and German Military Planning and the Concept of Force Multiplication in Three Conflicts by Samuel A Locke III Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY May 2020 Multiplying an Army Prussian and German Military Planning and the Concept of Force Multiplication in Three Conflicts Samuel A Locke III I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: 4/18/20 Samuel A Locke III, Student Date Approvals: 4/25/20 Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date 4/25/20 Dr. Brian Bonhomme, Committee Member Date 4/25/20 Dr. Kyle Starkey, Committee Member Date 4/25/20 Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT In this thesis the researcher discusses the implementation of force multipliers in the Prussian and German military. Originating with the wars of Frederick the Great and the geographical position of Prussia, force multipliers were key to the defense of the small state. As time continued, this tactic would become a mainstay for the Prussian military in the wars for German unification. Finally, they would be carried through to a grim conclusion with the Second World War and the belief that this tactic would easily make up for Germany’s shortcomings in material and manpower.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 French 1866 Chassepot Bayonet 2 Argentine 1891 Mauser Bayonet 3
    1 French 1866 Chassepot bayonet 2 Argentine 1891 Mauser bayonet 3 French Napoleonic Cutlass marked ProtoLunde on spine sword with sheath 4 Unmarked sword/machete with horn handle and brass guard with leather sheath 5 Brass handled French briquet with stacked cannonball mark 6 US Trapdoor Springfield bayonet with sheath nice condition 7 German quillback model 1898 bayonet dated 1913 on spine 8 Knights Templar masonic sword and sheath Pettibone Bros Cincinnati 9 Indian talwar antique sword 10 US Militia Indian War Period sword, unmarked 1870-1880 11 Model 1902 US Army Officers sword B Abrahams Philadelphia 12 French heavy calvary sword brass hilt and guard and scabbard 13 Model 1895 Spanish cavalry sword with scabbard 14 German sword acid etched blade and scabbard WWI vintage 15 Argentine military early 1900 vintage sword made in France 16 German WWI Artillery sword 17 British Napoleonic officers sword and scabbard unmarked 18 Philippine native sword made from Japanese sword blade WW2 19 US Marine Officers dress sword German made with scabbard 20 Japanese type 32 cavalry sword model 1899 WW2 with scabbard 21 Prussian artillery officers sword WWI and scabbard 22 Luigi Gazzan marked Turkish officers sword and scabbard 23 Early 1900's Siamese Naval Sword and scabbard 24 Japanese type 98 Army officers sword with scabbard and leather combat cover 25 (vacant) 26 Carl Eichorn WWI German dress sword and scabbard 27 Spanish WWI model 1907 Artillery Sword and scabbard 731.987.2847 Darrell Ridgely Office Auctioneer & Real Estate Broker 731.694.6213
    [Show full text]
  • It Will Cost What It Will!” Tour and Gravelotte-St
    At Any Cost: Metz 1870 is a game simulating the situation west of the Metz fortress during those few days of August 1870. The AT ANY COST: game is designed to be a playable, two-player brigade-scale game that allows players to experience the unique tactical warfare matchups that characterized fighting during the Franco- Prussian War. This era, though generally overlooked in the METZ 1870 gaming industry, is a fascinating study in Napoleonic tactics (and uniforms) slamming head-on into modern killing technology. The Prussian military juggernaut is armed with the new steel Krupp breach-loading artillery pieces that far outclassed the French guns. Prussian doctrine, adapted to the lessons learned during the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, allowed junior officers to exercise initiative and aggressiveness. The French army, meanwhile, was armed with the modern and deadly Chassepot rifle, a firearm so advanced that many argue its deployment alone should have won the war for the French. In addition, the French army was now equipped with their ultimate secret weapon - the Mitrailleuse, which was the first machinegun used en masse. Moreover, the game system makes clear that the French soldier, despite misconceptions to the contrary, fought valiantly during these battles. By all rights, they could have – and should have – won many of these engagements. But leadership, morale and tenacity won the day for the Prussians. All these factors are seamlessly embedded into the At Any Cost game system and players will be challenged to utilize their advantages
    [Show full text]
  • Mauser Military Rifles of the World P-147.Pdf
    Y1287pg134-189.FM Page 147 Friday, April 15, 2011 12:06 PM GERMANY • 147 The cut-off of the Kropatschek functions more smoothly and could handle. The smaller size of these cartridges did not require the reliably than that of the M71/84. In the M71/84, once the bolt is large M1871 action, so Mauser developed a small-size M1871 action. withdrawn, depressing the cartridge lifter forces the selector lever Figure 8.1 shows a rifle with such an action. This piece is a schutzen towards the butt. In this position it is impossible to replace the bolt into weapon chambered in 8.15 x 46R for target shooting. The components, the receiver. This difficulty is remedied only by disassembling the piece unequivocally of Oberndorf origin, bear the markings “Gebruder and pushing the lifter upwards from the bottom of the receiver. Mauser & Co.” on the barrel. Note that Wilhelm Mauser died in 1882, Additional differences exist in the cam action of the bolts. The M71/84 and in 1884 the factory changed its name to Waffenfabrik Mauser A.G. uses the lug positioned on the left rear of the bolt to bear upon a recess Because the 8.15 x 46R cartridge appeared after 1890, the illustrated in the receiver wall for cocking. The Kropatschek M1886 utilizes the weapon was fabricated around that time using older barrels projection of the cartridge lifter hinge from the receiver floor, which manufactured during 1880-1884. The action manufacture date cannot contacts a cam recess on the underside of the bolt, for cocking.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    1.0 Firearms History 1.0.1 Introduction While a history of firearms should start with the earliest of hand cannons, progressing through the It may seem that a history of firearms is an illogical wheel lock, miquelet and so on. For this book, way to begin this book, but any competent forensic however, it will start at the flintlock, as it is unlikely firearms examiner needs to have a good working that anything earlier would be encountered in every- knowledge of this subject matter. As such, it should day case work. A much more comprehensive history form part of the court qualification process at the of firearms is offered in Appendix 4. beginning of any trial. Having said that, though, it would be unreasonable to expect a firearms examiner with many years’ experience to be able to give, for 1.0.2 The flintlock (Figure 1.0.1) example, a precise date for the introduction of the Anson and Deeley push button fore-end. Such an The flintlock ignition system really signalled the esoteric piece of firearms history may have formed advent of an easy-to-use firearm with a simple part of the examiner’s training many years ago, but mechanism for the discharge of a missile via a unless s/he had a particular interest in shotgun powdered propellant. In this type of weapon, the history it would be unlikely that s/he would remem- propellant was ignited via a spark produced by ber little other than an approximate date or period. striking a piece of flint against a steel plate.
    [Show full text]
  • “Chassepot” Bayonets
    1 THE SPANISH “CHASSEPOT” BAYONETS The French Model 1866 Yataghan Bayonet, commonly known as the “Chassepot Bayonet”, was copied by many nations, due to its attractive design. The grooved brass hilt bears a chamfered T-mortise with a long guide slot into the muzzle ring. The locking mechanism is a simple press stud with flat spring secured by a rivet. Another rivet pins the grip to the tang. The steel crossguard has a hooked quillon with a rounded finial. The muzzle ring is adjustable, using a spanner screw. The blade is a bright single-edged fullered yataghan. French Model 1866 yataghan-bayonet; 572 x 30 mm blade, 17.5 mm muzzle ring diameter, overall length 696 mm. The Spanish manufactured “replicas” of this bayonet do not reproduce it exactly and my description of them is simplified by establishing two different types, those with Toledo Factory markings and those with no manufacturer’s markings at all: I will call the first ones “Toledanas” and the second ones “Vascongadas” (of Basque manufacture), as they were made by the Basque weapons industry. THE “TOLEDANAS” These are the closest to the French model and ,similar to this model , their muzzle ring which is open at the top , is tightened by a screw which can be either , longitudinally slotted for a standard flat screwdriver , or with double orifices as in the French original . The following sword-bayonets, with blades respectively inscribed “Fca DE TOLEDO 1870” and “Fca D TOLEDO 1860” illustrate both types, and in the second one we can also notice that the hilt is identical to that of the Spanish Model 1858 sword-bayonet for Marine Infantry, evidence that the 2 manufacture of “Chassepot” bayonets at the Toledo Factory was both, of “new manufacture” and of “conversion” type, same as with many other models or projects.
    [Show full text]