Ice Effect on Coast and Seabed in Baydaratskaya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ice Effect on Coast and Seabed in Baydaratskaya Stanislav Ogorodov1*, Vasiliy Arkhipov2,1, Osip Kokin1, Aleksey Marchenko3,2, Paul Overduin4, Donald Forbes5 1 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leninskiye Gory; 119991 Moscow, Russia; Tel: 7 495 939-22-38; Fax: 7 (495) 932-88-36 * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] 2 Zubov State Oceanographic Institute, Kropotkinskiy pereulok, 6, 119034, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] 3 The University Centre in Svalbard, Pb. 156 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway; e-mail: [email protected] GEOGRAPHY 4 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 21 5 Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] ICE EFFECT ON COAST AND SEABED IN BAYDARATSKAYA BAY, KARA SEA ABSTRACT. For the engineering design of INTRODUCTION underwater pipelines and communication cables in freezing seas, reliable estimates Sea ice, as a zonal factor associated with of the frequency and penetration depth the high latitudes of Arctic seas, plays an of ice-keel scour on the seabed and important role in the evolution of northern shoreface are required. Underestimation coasts. The ongoing development of oil and of ice gouging intensity on the seabed can gas fields and the construction of relevant lead to the infrastructure damage, while engineering facilities in the coastal and shelf overestimation leading to excessive burial areas (including navigation channels, coastal depth raises the cost of construction. Here terminals, drilling platforms, submarine we present results from recent studies of pipelines, and artificial islands) require new ice gouge morphology in Baydaratskaya information on the effects of sea ice on Bay, Kara Sea. The direct impact of ice coastal and seabed dynamics [Løset et al., gouging by floes on the seabed and shores 2006: Lanan et al., 2011]. This is one of is described, generalized and systematized: the most important factors determining the the depth of the gouges varies from the first selection of pipeline landfall sites, shore- centimeters up to 2 m; the most intensive crossing design, and required depths of ice gouging is observed near the fast ice burial. rim, due to the maximum impact executed by ice ridges frozen into large floe. We Until recently, little work has been done in propose a zonation of Baydaratskaya Bay Russia on the interaction between sea ice based on the types of ice formation and and the sea floor in coastal regions, whereas the intensity of ice impacts on the coasts abroad, especially in Canada and the USA, and sea floor. there is a long history of research on this topic. American and Canadian researchers KEY WORDS: Kara Sea, arctic coastal have documented the occurrence and dynamics, geotechnical safety, sea ice, ice processes of bottom scour and related ridges, ice gouging, bottom topography, the seabed forms associated with pressure intensity of ice influence, zoning. ridges and grounded ridges (stamukhi). ggi313.inddi313.indd 2211 226.08.20136.08.2013 99:22:11:22:11 Pioneering studies were undertaken on the In Russia, special studies of the sea ice Alaska shelf [e.g. Carsola, 1954; Rex, 1955; impacts (first of all, the effect of ice gouging) Reimnitz and Barnes, 1974; Barnes, 1982; started significantly later and were carried Reimnitz and Kempema, 1984; Barnes et al., out in the areas of submarine pipeline 1984]. With the help of echo sounders and construction (Baydaratskaya Bay of the Kara diving surveys, later augmented by sidescan Sea, the Pechora Sea, and the Sakhalin Island sonar, ice gouges were found on the sea floor shelf [Environmental conditions..., 1997; at depths of 0-65 m (a few deeper), with the Vershinin, 2005; Zubakin, 2006]. highest density in depths of 20–40 m. They GEOGRAPHY were up to 2 km long, incised as deep as 2,5 m In 2011, the so-called “Nord-Stream Gas into the sea floor, and were up to 67 m wide Pipeline” directly connected Russia and 22 [Barnes et al., 1984]. In the Canadian Beaufort Germany through the seabed of the Baltic Sea, seminal work by Shearer and Blasco Sea. In 2013 this pipeline will reach full [1975], Lewis [1977], Hnatiuk and Brown capacity. To provide gas for this pipeline, in [1977] established that ice scour occurred 2005, the “Yamal-Europe” pipeline project out to about 55 m depth, was most intense [Environmental conditions..., 1997], the lines if the depth range of 15–40 m, and that of which would cross Baydaratskaya Bay, was depths of scour penetration were typically revived and by August 2007, the construction <1 m but as deep as 7,6 m. Later syntheses of of the underwater crossing of the main gas results were provided by Rearic et al. [1990] pipeline across the Baydaratskaya Bay was for the Alaska shelf and Hill et al. [1991] for underway. This was to connect gas fields of the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Barrette [2011] the Yamal Peninsula with the pipeline network provides a recent review of issues related to in the European part of Russia by the shortest pipeline protection from ice gouging and route (Fig.1). The length of the underwater Wadhams [2012] provides new estimates of part of the pipeline is approximately 65 km, extreme depths and scour frequencies in the the maximum bottom depth in the crossing Beaufort Sea, recognizing the evidence for area is 22–23 m. In connection with the a reduction in gouging rates [Blasco et al., renewing of the project, investigations of 2004], possibly related to a reduction in the coastal zone dynamics and sea ice effects frequency of multiyear ice incursion. continued in 2005 after a 10-year hiatus. In order to assess the impact of the ice on the Ice gouging is a destructive mechanical impact of ice on the underlying ground surface. This impact on the shore and the floor of the Arctic seas is driven by the ice cover dynamics and mobility, hummocking (ridging), and formation of grounded hummocks (pressure ridges) controlled by hydrometeorological factors and coastal topography [Ogorodov, 2003]. Ice scour and push can extend onto and across the beach as ice pile-up and ice ride-up [Kovacs and Sodhi, 1980; Shapiro et al., 1984; Reimnitz et al., 1990; Forbes and Taylor, 1994], while underwater ice gouging is observed in the coastal zone out to depths of 55 m or more below the sea level (much deeper in regions of iceberg grounding). In direct observations from submarines, keels of large hummock formations reaching 50 m depth have been Fig. 1. “Yamal-Europe” gas pipelines crossing recorded [Lisitsyn, 1994]. Baydaratskaya Bay in the Kara Sea ggi313.inddi313.indd 2222 226.08.20136.08.2013 99:22:11:22:11 sea bottom, a wide range of investigations The sea ice of Baydaratskaya Bay consists of has been carried out, including field studies drift ice and fast ice (Fig. 2a). Close to the as well as mathematical modeling. Some open parts of the Yamal and Ural coasts, fast of the results and scientific conclusions of ice forms 20–30 days after the initial freeze- the work in which the authors participated up, with a thickness of approximately 30 cm. directly are presented in this paper. This young, relatively thin, fast ice is very unstable in the initial stages and therefore ICE CONDITIONS it can be easily broken strong wind shear or sea-level rise. However, with the growth of sea The autumn ice formation in Baydaratskaya ice thickness (up to 0.5 m) and the formation GEOGRAPHY Bay usually occurs in the absence of residual of ice hummocks and stamukhas, stabilizing ice, i.e. in open water. At the beginning ice conditions, the fast ice resistance 23 of October, as the radiation balance and increases considerably. Stable fast ice forms surface water temperature descend to near the Yamal coast and in the inner part negative values, the first, usually unstable of the bay only. Next to the Ural coast, fast ice appears. The climatic mean freeze-up ice is less stable and in the last several years, date for the formation of stable ice is about cases of its break-away have been observed. 15–20 October. Year-to-year variations in the In the early part of the season, the fast ice hydro-meteorological conditions determine spreads seaward quickly, its outer border the temporal range of freeze-up. In seasons reaching the 5–7 m isobath in November when cold air masses from the Arctic Ocean and the 8–10 m isobath in December. In or the cooled continent prevail, ice formation February-March the seaward border of fast starts early (the first 10 days of October); in ice corresponds to the isobath of 15 m at the contrast, when warm air from the Atlantic Yamal coast, where its width is 7–9 km, and dominates the autumn season, ice formation to the isobaths of 10–12 m off the Ural coast, occurs late (end of November or even into where its width is approximately 5–7 km. December). In more seaward parts of the bay remote from the shore, freeze-up occurs 10– Outside the fast ice limits, the central part 15 days later the ice formation close to shore. of Baydaratskaya Bay, in depths of more than 10–15 m, is the area of mobile pack After the ice cover reaches the grey-white ice. Compared with the immobile fast ice, stage, the rate of further growth in ice in the same equal conditions, the thickness thickness is directly proportional to the of drifting ice is generally less. Along the intensity of the underlying surface cooling interface between fast ice and pack ice, as and poorly correlated to the date of stable ice well as on the borders of drifting ice fields, formation.
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Assessment for the Baydaratskaya Bay Crossing of the Yamai - West Europe Gas Pipeline System
    Proceedings of the Seventh (1997) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Honolulu, USA, May 25-30, 1997 Copyright © 1997 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers ISBN 1-880653.-28-1 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-29-X (Vol. I) Environmental Impact Assessment for the Baydaratskaya Bay Crossing of the Yamai - West Europe Gas Pipeline System Alexander V. Beloshapkov, Vladimir B. Leschinsky and Alexander S. Tsvetsinsky EPS EcoSystem Moscow, Russia Konstantin A. Kashunin JSC Petergaz BV Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT BOVANENKOVSKOE GAS FIELD~ The Baydaratskaya Bay crossing in the Kara Sea is a part of the Yamal - West Europe gas system project, It is the fast ° experience of the large-diameter gas pipeline engineering in the Russian Arctic seas. The Environmental Impact Assessment of the construction for the fast two lines of the crossing is based on the results of six-year scientific program of Baydaratskaya r YAMAL Bay environmental studies. Laws, rules and regulations MARRE-SALE applicable to Environmental Impact Assessment in the Russian Federation are considered. The sources and types of possible impact during construction and operation stages are shown. % q4} KEY WORDS: Environment, impact, assessment, pipeline, underwater crossing, ecological examination. O q/. INTRODUCTION URAI \, B s ° The development of the Bovanenkovskoye gas field on the Z~ 20 40 km Yamal Peninsula in Northwest Siberia by JSC Gazprom, the Russian Gas company, requires a gas transport system to be PIPELINE i laid across the Baydaratskaya Bay in the Kara Sea. The .... PIPELINEUNDERWATER CROSSING i underwater crossing of main gas pipeline will connect the Yamal gas fields and onshore pipelines in the Yamal Peninsula with the Ural - West Europe pipeline system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicionarioct.Pdf
    McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Earth Science Second Edition McGraw-Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be repro- duced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 0-07-141798-2 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: 0-07-141045-7 All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please contact George Hoare, Special Sales, at [email protected] or (212) 904-4069. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw- Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decom- pile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill’s prior consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded Daily to the Geodetic Survey Division in Ottawa, Where They Are Reviewed for Quality Control, Archived, and Uploaded to the International GPS Service
    Arctic Coastal Dynamics Report of the 4th International Workshop VNIIOkeangeologia, St. Petersburg (Russia), 10-13 November 2003 Edited by Volker Rachold and Georgy Cherkashov Volker Rachold, Alfred Wegener Institute, Research Unit Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany Georgy Cherkashov, VNIIOkeangeologia (Institute for Geology and Mineral Resources of the Ocean), Angliysky prospect 1, 190121 St. Petersburg, Russia Preface Arctic Coastal Dynamics (ACD) is a joint project of the International Arctic Sciences Committee (IASC) and the International Permafrost Association (IPA) and a regional project of IGBP-LOICZ (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme – Land- Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone). Its overall objective is to improve our understanding of circum-Arctic coastal dynamics as a function of environmental forcing, coastal geology and cryology and morphodynamic behavior. The fourth IASC-sponsored ACD workshop was held in St. Petersburg, Russia, on November 10-13, 2003. Participants from Canada (7), Germany (7), Great Britain (2), the Netherlands (1), Norway (1), Russia (32), Ukraine (1) and the United States (8) attended. During the first part of the workshop, 63 papers dealing with regional and/or circum-Arctic coastal dynamics were presented. Based on the material presented, five thematic working groups were identified: (1) GIS working group to develop of a circum-Arctic coastal GIS system, (2) coastal permafrost working group to discuss processes involved in the transition of onshore to offshore permafrost, (3) biogeochemistry working group with the focus on transport and fate of eroded material (4) biodiversity working group to initiate planning of an Arctic Coastal Biodiversity research agenda, (5) environmental data working group to discuss coastal dynamics as a function of environmental forcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Beltcov Andrei.Pdf (5.892Mb)
    Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER’S THESIS Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, 2016 Offshore Technology/ Marine and Subsea Technology Open Writer: Andrei Y. Beltcov ………………………………………… (Writer’s signature) Faculty supervisor: Professor Ove Tobias Gudmestad (University of Stavanger) External supervisor(s): Professor Anatoly Borisovich Zolotukhin (Gubkin University) Title of thesis: «Development concepts for Sakhalin's offshore field development» Credits (ECTS):30 Key words: Pages: 15 + enclosure: 4 Concept development, Concept selection, Sakhalin’s Island offshore development, Concept selection criteria. Stavanger, June, 15, 2016 Abstract When a company undertakes to develop an oilfield, certain activities represent the foundation of the development, ranging from information about the metocean conditions at the site to marketing. The concept phase itself includes screening of concepts, selection of concept and concept development. Use of engineering data and calculations that represents a feasibility study of offshore oil and gas field is essentially the screening of concepts. The selection of concept consists of finding a solution that would meet world technical, environmental and safety demands. Despite the fact that Sakhalin Island shelf contains enormous hydrocarbon reserves, it is also a very environmentally sensitive region. High environmental risks and extreme weather conditions entail high capital expenditures, which put significant burden of responsibility on the project team during the development concept stage. This is of great importance during the early stages of concept selection. Selecting the optimum Sakhalin Shelf development concept is the aim of my thesis. Significance in the concept selection chain affects selection of various parameters affecting the optimum development concept and subsequent prioritization. Special attention is paid to challenges and peculiarities that can be faced at the Sakhalin Region and could affect the concept of field development.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Dredging in the Arctic and Other Deep Ocean Locations
    Proceedings of Western Dredging Association and Texas A&M University Center for Dredging Studies' "Dredging Summit and Expo 2015" CHALLENGES OF DREDGING IN THE ARCTIC AND OTHER DEEP OCEAN LOCATIONS R. E. Randall1 and C. K. Jin2 ABSTRACT Dredging in the Arctic Ocean is challenging due to ice cover, permafrost, iceberg scour, whaling season, ice gouging, and remote location. In the deep ocean 1000 m (3280 ft), dredging is a technique for recovering minerals from the deep ocean waters where water depth is a major challenge for the pumping system. Another application for dredging in the deep ocean and beneath ice covered waters is for recovering petroleum reserves. This paper reviews the recent literature of current systems used for deep ocean mining and the need for developing oil and gas development beneath ice covered water. Conceptual ideas are discussed for overcoming the dredging challenges that include the use of remotely operated vehicles, trenchers, hopper dredges and self-propelled cutter suction dredges. Keywords: Dredging, trenching, arctic, ocean mining, deep water. INTRODUCTION The demand for essential industrial resources, such as oil and gas, has been increasing, which accelerates the decrease in such resources on land and in coastal regions. Accordingly, expanding the exploration to harsh environmental regions, especially the Arctic and deep oceans, turns out to be a promising solution since they are far less developed. For example, it is reported that the area north of the Arctic Circle comprises 13% and 30% of the undiscovered oil and gas in the world, respectively (Gautier et al. 2009). As one of the most important applications in a severe ocean environment, dredging has been utilized to excavate material and minerals, or even improve the environment (Bray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dynamics of the Pechora and Kara Seas
    DOI: 10.15356/2071-9388_03v09_2016_04 Stanislav A. Ogorodov1*, Alisa V. Baranskaya2, Nataliya G. Belova3, Anatoly M. Kamalov4, Dmitry E. Kuznetsov5, Paul P. Overduin6, Natalya N. Shabanova7, Aleksey P. Vergun8 1 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; e-mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author ENVIRONMENT 2 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; 53 e-mail: [email protected] 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; e-mail: [email protected] 5 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; e-mail: [email protected] 6 Department of Geosciences, division of periglacial research, Alfred Wegener Institute Telegrafenberg A43, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 7 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; e-mail: [email protected] 8 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia, Tel: + 7-495-939 25 26 Fax: + 7-495-932 88 36; Zubov State Oceanographic Institute, Kropotkinskiy pereulok, 6, 119034, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] COASTAL DYNAMICS OF THE PECHORA AND KARA SEAS UNDER CHANGING CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND HUMAN DISTURBANCES ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceberg 1 Iceberg
    Iceberg 1 Iceberg For other uses, see Iceberg (disambiguation). An iceberg is a large piece of freshwater ice that has broken off a glacier or an ice shelf and is floating freely in open water. It may subsequently become frozen into pack ice (one form of sea ice). As it drifts into shallower waters, it may come into contact with the seabed, a process referred to as seabed gouging by ice. Etymology The word "iceberg" is a partial loan translation from Dutch ijsberg, literally meaning ice mountain, cognate to Danish isbjerg, German Eisberg, Low Saxon Iesbarg and Iceberg at Baffin Bay, Greenland Swedish isberg. Overview Because the density of pure ice is about 920 kg/m³, and that of seawater about 1025 kg/m³, typically only one-tenth of the volume of an iceberg is above water. The shape of the underwater portion can be difficult to judge by looking at the portion above the surface. This has led to the expression "tip of the iceberg", for a problem or difficulty that is only a small manifestation of a larger problem. Icebergs generally range from 1 to 75 metres (3.3 to 246.1 ft) above sea level and weigh 100,000 to 200,000 metric tons (110,000 to 220,000 short tons). The largest known iceberg in the North Atlantic was 168 metres (551 ft) above sea level, reported by the USCG icebreaker East Wind in 1958, making it the height of a 55-story building. These icebergs originate from the glaciers of western Greenland and may have an interior temperature of −15 to −20 °C (5 to −4 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Offshore Pipelines Against Drifting Ice: a Discussion on Standards and Guidelines Barrette, Paul; Sudom, Denise; Babaei, Hossein
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Protecting offshore pipelines against drifting ice: a discussion on standards and guidelines Barrette, Paul; Sudom, Denise; Babaei, Hossein This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-42090 Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2015, May 31-June 5, 2015, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, 2015-05-31 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ae5751ff-866f-46fd-b271-2480437e6fe4 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ae5751ff-866f-46fd-b271-2480437e6fe4 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Patches and Their Influence on Coastal Erosion at Baydaratskaya
    water Article Snow Patches and Their Influence on Coastal Erosion at Baydaratskaya Bay Coast, Kara Sea, Russian Arctic Daria Bogatova (Aleksyutina) 1,*, Sergey Buldovich 2 and Vanda Khilimonyuk 2 1 Geoecology of the Northern Territories, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia 2 Geocryology Department, Faculty of Geology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (V.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-495-939-2526 Abstract: The Arctic coastal environment is a very dynamic system and sensitive to any changes. In our research we demonstrate that nivation (snow patch activity) impacts the Arctic landscape especially in the coastal dynamic at the western part of Russian Arctic. During fieldwork, snowbanks were described and studied and their qualitative role in the development of coastal systems was revealed for Baydaratskaya Bay coast, the Kara Sea. On one side, the large snow cover protects the coastal slope from thermodenudation and thermoabrasion; on the other side, a thick layer of snow affects the ground temperature regime. During snow melting, snow patches contribute to the removal of material from the coastal slope. The quantitative effect of snow on the ground temperature regime was assessed according to numerical simulations. The critical snow thickness was determined based on a calculation. Critical snow thicknesses based on simulation and field data correlated well. The numerical simulation showed the talik formation under the snow patch. Talik size essentially depends on the freezing temperature of sediment (influenced by salinity). The Citation: Bogatova (Aleksyutina), D.; changes of ground temperature regime might further generate thawing settlement of sediment under Buldovich, S.; Khilimonyuk, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Kara Sea) Based on Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data
    remote sensing Article Dynamics of Permafrost Coasts of Baydaratskaya Bay (Kara Sea) Based on Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data Anna Novikova 1,*, Nataliya Belova 1, Alisa Baranskaya 1 , Daria Aleksyutina 1, Alexey Maslakov 1, Egor Zelenin 2, Natalia Shabanova 1 and Stanislav Ogorodov 1 1 Laboratory of Geoecology of the North, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (N.B.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (D.A.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (S.O.) 2 Laboratory of Neotectonics and Modern Geodynamics, Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky lane, 7, 119017 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-495-939-2526 Received: 8 August 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018; Published: 16 September 2018 Abstract: Arctic coasts composed of frozen deposits are extremely sensitive to climate change and human impact. They retreat with average rates of 1–2 m per year, depending on climatic and permafrost conditions. In recent decades, retreat rates have shown a tendency to increase. In this paper, we studied the coastal dynamics of two key sites (Ural and Yamal coasts) of Baydaratskaya Bay, Kara Sea, where a gas pipeline had been constructed. Based on multi-temporal aerial and satellite imagery, we identified coastal erosion rates at several time lapses, in natural conditions and under human impact, and discussed their temporal variability. In addition to planimetric (m/yr), we calculated volumetric (m3/m/yr) retreat rates of erosional coasts using ArcticDEM.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RESPONSE of DENSE SAND to the ICE GOUGING EVENT By
    THE RESPONSE OF DENSE SAND TO THE ICE GOUGING EVENT by © Afrouz Nematzadeh A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2019 St. John's Newfoundland Canada ABSTRACT The integrity of subsea pipelines in the Arctic regions are threatened by ice-related subsea geohazard. A common practice for physical protection of the pipelines against the ice loads is to burying them inside the subsea trenches. However, determining the minimum burial depth of the pipeline to minimize the construction cost is a challenging design aspect of Arctic offshore pipelines. This requires an in-depth understanding of the ice-soil-pipe interaction, which in turn is significantly affected by ice-soil interaction and the foucuse of this thesis. Mohr-Coulomb soil model is conventionally used for continuum modeling of dense sand by adopting the constant friction and dilation angles. However, this approach neglects the pre-peak hardening and the post-peak softening behavior of dense sand. In this study, two smart self-correcting soil models were incorporated into an advanced Coupled Eulerian- Lagrangian (CEL) analysis to automatically update the shear strength parameters by the magnitude of plastic strains. The analysis was conducted using ABAQUS/ Explicit scheme incorporating the soil model that was coded into a user-defined subroutine. The soil strength parameters are self- corrected to model the nonlinear hardening, softening and pressure dependency behavior of dense sand by considering the ice keel bearing pressure and octahedral shear strain.
    [Show full text]
  • Project SHEET Baydaratskaya Bay, Russia Pipeline Crossing
    PROJECT SHEET BAYdaratskaYA BAY, RUSSIA PIPELINE CROSSING INTRODUCTION features The Baydaratskaya Bay Project is located in the Client Yamalgas invest (Gazprom) Kara Sea in the North of Russia. The Kara Sea is bordered on its western side by Novaya Zemlya Period July - November 2008 and on the east by the North Siberian Coast. Location Baydaratskaya Bay, Kara Sea, Baydaratskaya Bay is located in the south of the Russian Federation Kara Sea between the Ural Coast and the Yamal Peninsula . Yamalgasinvest (Gazprom) is planning Main Contractor Mezhregiontrubo provo destroy (MRTS) the construction of four pipelines and two cable crossings at Baydaratskaya Bay for the exploitation of the Bovanenkova and Harasawejskoje gas field on the Yamal Peninsula. The pipeline trajectory continues to Uktha an important industrial city in the Komi Republic of North Western Russia. The gas mainline system Bovanenkova-Uktha is part of the Yamal-Europe gas mainline projected for natural gas supply to the gas-transport network of Central Russia an d further on to Western Europe. Mezhregiontruboprovods troy (MRTS) was awarded the works as the main contractor for the A installation of 2 pipelines (main and reserve) with an outside diameter of 1,219 mm. The de sign A Location map capacity of these two subsea pipeline s is 68.5 B Work in progress billion m3 per year. The overall scope covered the C Due to its northern location the area is characterized by a dredging of a 40 km long trench from 7 km severe arctic climate allowing operations only to take place from July until October offshore from the Yamal Coast to 21 km offshore from the Ural Coast.
    [Show full text]