DOCSLIB.ORG

Norwegian Tunnelling Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norwegian Tunnelling Technology NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY NORWEGIAN Are you looking for tunneling technology and experience? NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Check out: TECHNOLOGY www.tunnel.no The Tunneling Technology Website NORWEGIAN T UNNELLING T ECHNOLOGY You will find: – Consultants and experts – Contractors – Equipment and Suppliers – Applied technology – Project descriptions – Publications A NFF (Norwegian Tunnelling Society) PUBLICATION NO. 23 NO. PUBLICATION NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY initiative to promote modern, cost and time efficient tunnelling PUBLICATION NO. 23 nORWegian TUnneLLing sOCieTY REPRESENTS EXPERTISE IN • Hard Rock Tunneling techniques • Rock blasting technology • Rock mechanics and engineering geology Used in THe design and CONSTRUCTION OF • Hydroelectric power development, including: - water conveying tunnels - unlined pressure shafts - subsurface power stations - lake taps - earth and rock fill dams • Transportation tunnels • Underground storage facilities • Underground openings for for public use NORSK FORENING FOR FJELLSPRENGNINGSTEKNIKK Norwegian Tunnelling Sosiety [email protected] - www.tunnel.no - www.nff.no nORWegian TUnneLLing sOCieTY REPRESENTS EXPERTISE IN • Hard Rock Tunneling techniques • Rock blasting technology • Rock mechanics and engineering geology NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Used in THe design and TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION OF Publication No. 23 • Hydroelectric power development, including: - water conveying tunnels NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY - unlined pressure shafts - subsurface power stations - lake taps 2014 - earth and rock fill dams • Transportation tunnels • Underground storage facilities • Underground openings for for public use NORSK FORENING FOR FJELLSPRENGNINGSTEKNIKK Norwegian Tunnelling Sosiety [email protected] - www.tunnel.no - www.nff.no DESIGN/PRINT BY HELLI - VISUELL KOMMUNIKASJON, OSLO, NORWAY NorwegiaN TunnelliNg SocieT y PublicaTioN No. 23 PUBLICATION NO. 23 © Norsk Forening for Fjellsprengningsteknikk NFF ISBN 978-82-92641-30-9 Front page: Stetind, courtesy: Norwegian Public Roads Administration Layout/Print: HELLI - Visuell kommunikasjon AS [email protected] www.helli.no DISCLAIMER “Readers are advised that the Publications from Norwegian Tunnelling Society NFF are issued solely for informational purposes. The opinions and statements included are based on reliable sources in good faith. In no event, however, shall NFF and/or the authors be liable for direct or indirect inciden- tal or consequential damages resulting from the use of this information” 4 NorwegiaN TunnelliNg SocieT y PublicaTioN No. 23 FOREWORD The present publication, No. 23 in the English language series from the Norwegian Tunnelling Society NFF, has – as always – the intention of sharing with our col- leagues and friends internationally the latest news and experience gained in the use of the underground; this time with focus on tunnelling technology in general. Publication No 1 - “Norwegian Hard Rock Tunnelling” issued 32 years ago may have given an impression of a mountainous country with entirely solid, competent rock. The picture is more complicated, several incidents underscore variety. Developers set new benchmarks for safety and quality, more pre-investigation is necessary, plans and specifications are more detailed as are the contract documents. The basic situation, however, is unchanged. Cooperation, contribution and flex- ibility are still common approach, modifications take place when appropriate and in the context of durability and maintenance costs as seen from the owners; safety and reliability as seen from the public; methods, techniques and materials as seen from scientists, advisers, suppliers and contractors. Publication 23 is prepared by NFF members. Some details on the authors are included in Annex I. On behalf of NFF it is a privilege to express our sincere thanks to the Editorial Committees and the Authors. Without their efforts the preparing of this publication would not have been possible. Oslo, May 2014 Norwegian Tunnelling Society International Committee 5 CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................................................ 5 01. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Background .........................................................................................................................................................13 Development of Tunneling in Norway ...............................................................................................................14 In the Hall of the Mountain King .......................................................................................................................15 Norway, a nation of notorious risk takers? And why? .......................................................................................15 Concluding remark .............................................................................................................................................16 02. GROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING.......................................................... 19 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................19 2 Investigation stages ........................................................................................................................................19 3 Pre-construction investigation methods .........................................................................................................22 4 Construction stage investigation methods......................................................................................................29 5 Investigations during operation ................................................................................................................................................31 6 Extent of investigation ...................................................................................................................................32 7 Concluding remarks .......................................................................................................................................33 References ..........................................................................................................................................................33 03. EXCAVATION AND SUPPORT METHODS ................................................................................................... 35 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................35 2 Excavation methods .......................................................................................................................................35 3 Water control ..................................................................................................................................................36 4 Contracts ........................................................................................................................................................36 5 Rock Support Philosophy and Practices ........................................................................................................37 6 Geological Pre-Investigations and Feasibility Studies ..................................................................................37 7 Investigations during tunnel excavation ........................................................................................................38 8 Expertise at the tunnel face during scaling and geological mapping ............................................................38 9 Permanent Rock Support Strategy .................................................................................................................39 10 Ground freezing............................................................................................................................................41 References ..........................................................................................................................................................43 04. TUNNEL AND CAVERN SUPPORT SELECTION IN NORWAY, BASED ON ROCK MASS ­cLASSIFICATION WITH THE Q-SYSTEM.................................................................................................. 45 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................45 2 How and why Q was developed ................................................................................................................45 3 Classification method briefly described .........................................................................................................45 4 Examples of core-logging with Q .................................................................................................................47 5 Additional advice concerning core logging ...................................................................................................48 6 Characterizing surface exposures with examples ..........................................................................................49 7 Additional advice concerning surface exposure logging ...............................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stability and Water Leakage of Hard Rock Subsea Tunnels
    Stability and water leakage of hard rock subsea tunnels B. Nilsen The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway A. Palmstrøm Norconsult as, Sandvika, Norway ABSTRACT: The many undersea tunnels along the coast of Norway offer excellent opportunities to study the key factors determining stability and water leakage in hard rock subsea tunnels. About 30 such tunnels have been constructed in Norway the last 20 years, all of them excavated by drill and blast. The longest tunnel is 7.9 km with its deepest point 260 metres below sea level. Although all tunnels are located in Precambrian or Palaeozoic rocks, some of them have encountered complex faulting or less competent rocks like shale and schist. The severe tunnelling problems met in these tunnels emphasise the need of a better understanding of the key factors determining stability and water leakage of such projects. This has been discussed based on the experience from several completed projects. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSEA TUNNELS In Norway, about 30 subsea tunnels, comprising Compared to conventional tunnels, subsea tunnels more than 100 km have been built the last 20 years. are quite special in several ways. Concerning Most of these are 2 or 3 lane road tunnels, but some engineering geology and rock engineering, the are also for water, sewage, or oil and gas pipelines. following factors are the most important (see also All tunnels so far are drill and blast. The locations of Figure 4): some key projects, and tunnels being discussed later • Most of the project area is covered by water. in this paper, are shown in Figure 1, and some main Hence, special investigation techniques need to figures concerning length and depth are given in be applied, and interpretation of the investigation Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mulighetsstudie - Evakueringsrom
    Mulighetsstudie - Evakueringsrom Ove Njå Rapport - 2017/140 © Kopiering er kun tillatt etter avtale med IRIS eller oppdragsgiver. International Research Institute of Stavanger AS er sertifisert etter et kvalitetssystem basert på NS-EN ISO 9001 og NS-EN ISO 14001:2004 www.iris.no © Kopiering er kun tillatt etter avtale med IRIS eller oppdragsgiver. International Research Institute of Stavanger AS er sertifisert etter et kvalitetssystem basert på NS-EN ISO 9001 og NS-EN ISO 14001:2004 Prosjektnummer: 7351039 Prosjektets tittel: Mulighetsstudie Evakueringsrom Oppdragsgiver(e): VRI Rogaland / Rogaland fylkeskommune og EUREKA/Align ISBN: 978-82-490-0889-6 Gradering: Åpen Kvalitetssikrer: Geir Sverre Braut, SuS Stavanger, 25.08.2017 Ove Njå Einar Leknes Prosjektleder Direktør IRIS Samfunnsforskning Prosjektet er støttet av Norges forskningsråd gjennom programmet Virkemidler for regional FoU og innovasjon – VRI © Kopiering er kun tillatt etter avtale med IRIS eller oppdragsgiver. International Research Institute of Stavanger AS er sertifisert etter et kvalitetssystem basert på NS-EN ISO 9001 og NS-EN ISO 14001:2004 © Kopiering er kun tillatt etter avtale med IRIS eller oppdragsgiver. International Research Institute of Stavanger AS er sertifisert etter et kvalitetssystem basert på NS-EN ISO 9001 og NS-EN ISO 14001:2004 International Research Institute of Stavanger www.iris.no Forord Tunnelsikkerhet har vært viktig i Rogaland siden Arne Rettedal gjennom sitt virke i Rogaland fylkeskommune fikk bygget Rennfast-tunnelene. Det var nybrottsarbeid, hvor tunnelbrann ikke ble ansett som styrende for beredskapen. Ulykker inntraff, men det ble ikke de samme hendelsene som man erfarte i Sør-Europa. En brann i Mastrafjordtunnelen i 2006 kunne fått fatale følger, men heldigvis klarte Kystbussen å snu i en havarinisje like før alle ble innhyllet i røyk.
    [Show full text]
  • Hele Rapporten Og Dens Enkelte Deler
    TØI rapport 1542/2016 Tor-Olav Nævestad Karen Ranestad Beate Elvebakk Sunniva Meyer Kartlegging av kjøretøybranner i norske vegtunneler 2008-2015 TØI-rapport 1542/2016 Kartlegging av kjøretøybranner i norske vegtunneler 2008-2015 Transportøkonomisk institutt (TØI) har opphavsrett til hele rapporten og dens enkelte deler. Innholdet kan brukes som underlagsmateriale. Når rapporten siteres eller omtales, skal TØI oppgis som kilde med navn og rapportnummer. Rapporten kan ikke endres. Ved eventuell annen bruk må forhåndssamtykke fra TØI innhentes. For øvrig gjelder åndsverklovens bestemmelser. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1823-0 Papirversjon ISBN 978-82-480-1821-6 Elektronisk versjon Oslo, desember 2016 Tittel: Kartlegging av kjøretøybranner i norske Title: Vehicle fires in Norwegian road tunnels vegtunneler 2008-2015 2008-2015 Forfattere: Tor-Olav Nævestad Authors: Tor-Olav Nævestad Karen Ranestad Karen Ranestad Beate Elvebakk Beate Elvebakk Sunniva Meyer Sunniva Meyer Dato: 12.2016 Date: 12.2016 TØI-rapport 1542/2016 TØI Report: 1542/2016 Sider: 96 Pages: 96 ISBN papir: 978-82-480-1823-0 ISBN Paper: 978-82-480-1823-0 ISBN elektronisk: 978-82-480-1821-6 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1821-6 ISSN: 0808-1190 ISSN: 0808-1190 Finansieringskilde: Statens vegvesen, Financed by: Norwegian Public Roads Vegdirektoratet Administration Prosjekt: 4398 – Vegtunnelbrann2016 Project: 4398 – Vegtunnelbrann2016 Prosjektleder: Tor-Olav Nævestad Project Manager: Tor-Olav Nævestad Kvalitetsansvarlig: Rune Elvik Quality Manager: Rune Elvik Fagfelt: 24 Sikkerhet og organisering Research Area: 24 Safety and organisation Emneord: Vegtunnel Keywords: Road tunnels Branner Fires Undersjøiske vegtunnel Undersea tunnel Tunge kjøretøy Heavy vehicles Sammendrag: Summary: Det er godt over 1100 vegtunneler i Norge.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski Touring in the Narvik Region
    SKI TOURING IN THE NARVIK REGION TOP 5 © Mattias Fredriksson © Mattias Narvik is a town of 14 000 people situated in Nordland county in northern Norway, close to the Lofoten islands. It is also a region that serves as an excellent base for alpine ski touring and off-piste skiing. Here, you are surrounded by fjords, islands, deep valleys, pristine lakes, waterfalls, glaciers and mountain plateaus. But, first and foremost, wild and rugged mountains in seemingly endless terrain. Imagine standing on one of those Arctic peaks admiring the view just before you cruise down on your skis to the fjord side. WHY SKI TOURING IN THE NARVIK REGION? • A great variety in mountain landscapes, from the fjords in coastal Norway to the high mountain plateaus in Swedish Lapland. • Close to 100 high quality ski touring peaks within a one- hour drive from Narvik city centre. • Large climate variations within short distances, which improves the chances of finding good snow and weather. • A ski touring season that stretches from the polar night with its northern lights, to the late spring with never- ending days under the midnight sun. • Ascents and descents up to 1700 metres in vertical distance. • Some of the best chute skiing in the world, including 1200-metre descents straight down to the fjord. • Possibilities to do train accessed ski touring. • A comprehensive system of huts that can be used for hut-to-hut ski touring or as base camps. • 5 alpine skiing resorts within a one-hour car drive or train ride • The most recognised heli-skiing enterprise in Scandinavia, offering access to over 200 summits.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandvika Før- Og Etterundersøkelser Fuglelivet I Engervannet Rapport
    NYTT DOBBELTSPOR SKØYEN – ASKER PARSELL LYSAKER - SANDVIKA FØR- OG ETTERUNDERSØKELSER FUGLELIVET I ENGERVANNET RAPPORT 02 Rapport ferdigstilt 20.06.2015 RS ER ER Rev. Revisjonen gjelder Dato Utarb. av Kontr. av Godkj. av Ant. sider Askerbanen km 7,7-13,4 26 Lysaker – Sandvika Produsent Asplan Viak AS Før- og etterundersøkelser fuglelivet i Prod. dok. nr. Engervannet Erstatning for Erstattet av Prosjekt: Skøyen - Asker Dokument nr. Rev. Parsell: Lysaker - Sandvika USA50-4-R-030419 02 Dokument nr. Før – og etterundersøkelser fuglelivet ved Enger- vannet, Sandvika i forbindelse med utbygging av parsell dobbeltspor Lysaker-Sandvika og turveg på sørsiden av Engervannet Forord Asplan Viak og Biofokus har på oppdrag fra Jernbaneverket utbygging foretatt naturfaglige registreringer av fugl ved Engervann i perioden 2006–2013. Vidar Tveiten har vært kontaktperson hos Jernbaneverket. Terje Blindheim (BioFokus) og Esben Rude (Asplan Viak) har vært prosjektansvarlig i ulike perioder. Rune Solvang og Heiko Liebel (Asplan Viak) har stått for kartleggingen. Rune Solvang har stått for rapporteringen. Terje Bøhler (foretaket Senatur) har kvalitetssik- ret rapporten og kommer med faglige innspill. Oslo/Sandvika 1. april 2015 Rune Solvang 2 SAMMENDRAG Bakgrunn Det er i perioden 2006-2013 gjort systematiske tellinger av vannfugl i Engervannet, Sand- vika i forbindelse med utbygging av dobbeltspor Lysaker-Sandvika og utbygging av turveg rundt Engervannet. Formålet har vært å registrere eventuelle endringer av forekomsten av vannfugl i forbindelse med utbyggingene. Det er gjennomført et år med tellinger før utbyg- ging (2006), fem år med tellinger ifbm med utbygging (2007-2011) og to år med tellinger etter utbygging av dobbeltspor (2012-2013). Beskrivelse av fuglelivet Engervannet er et svært viktig raste-, myte(fjærfelling)- og næringsområde for våtmarks- fugl, spesielt andefugl.
    [Show full text]
  • F R Id T Jo F Nansens in St It U
    VOLOS -R" RECEIVED WO* 2 9 899 oari Olav Schram Stokke Subregional Cooperation and Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment: The Barents Sea INSTITUTT POLOS Report No. 5/1997 NANSENS Polar Oceans Reports FRIDTJOF 3 1-05 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTE THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Olav Schram Stokke Subregional Cooperation and Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment: The Barents Sea POLOS Report No. 5/1997 ISBN 82-7613-235-9 ISSN 0808-3622 ---------- Polar Oceans Reports a publication series from Polar Oceans and the Law of the Sea Project (POLOS) Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, Postboks 326, N-1324 Lysaker, Norway Tel: 67111900 Fax: 67111910 E-mail: [email protected] Bankgiro: 6222.05.06741 Postgiro: 5 08 36 47 © The Fridtjof Nansen Institute Published by The Fridtjof Nansen Institute DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Polar Oceans and the Law of the Sea Project (POLOS) POLOS is a three-year (1996-98) international research project in international law and international relations, initiated and coordinated by the Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI). The main focus of POLOS is the changing conditions in the contemporary international community influencing the Arctic and the Antarctic. The primary aim of the project is to analyze global and regional solutions in the law of the sea and ocean policy as these relate to the Arctic and Southern Oceans, as well as to explore the possible mutual relevance of the regional polar solutions, taking into consideration both similarities and differences of the two polar regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruter and the Municipality of Bærum Sign Micromobility Contract with TIER
    PRESS RELEASE 23 APRIL 2020 Ruter and the Municipality of Bærum sign micromobility contract with TIER TIER has been confirmed as the new supplier of micromobility solutions for the Municipality of Bærum. The municipality’s bike hire scheme will now be expanding to include electric scooters and electric bicycles. Ruter, the Public Transport Authority of Oslo and the former Akershus region, has entered into a public-public collaboration with the Municipality of Bærum. The purpose of the collaboration is to establish a wide range of mobility services for Bærum. The procurement process has now been concluded, with TIER GmbH being selected as the municipality’s supplier of micromobility solutions. – This will be the first time Ruter integrates micromobility solutions into our existing public transport system. Our collaboration with the municipality is working very well, and we believe this is going to be an important step towards the future of mobility services," says Endre Angelvik, director of mobility services at Ruter. The partnership’s plan is to integrate shared e-bikes and e-scooters into the existing public transport system – first in Lysaker, Sandvika and Fornebu in 2020, then in other parts of the municipality during springtime next year. Ruter and the municipality of Bærum intend for the new micromobility scheme to become a valuable and safe addition to the environments where they are introduced. To this end, the partnership will aim to keep in close touch with the municipality’s general population, for purposes of receiving feedback and making adjustments. Formally, the purpose of the contract is to develop a scheme that • complements existing public transport services by allowing travellers seamless movement from transport hubs all the way to their final destination • provides the aforementioned scheme to the city's inhabitants, visitors, businesses and municipal employees – Bærum is on the way towards becoming a climate-smart municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutetabell for Buss Bærum–Oslo
    1 Rutetabeller, Bærum – Oslo Gjelder fra 5. juli 2021 • 130 Sandvika -Skøyen • 140 Bekkestua - Østerås - Skøyen • 140E Hosle - Nationaltheatret • 150 Gullhaug - Oslo bussterminal • 150E Gullhaug - Nationaltheatret • 160 Rykkinn -Oslo bussterminal • 160E Rykkinn - Nationaltheatret 2 Sandvika - Skøyen 130 Gyldig fra: 05.07.2021 Mandag - fredag Monday - Friday Sandvika bussterminalEvje Valler skoleLillehagveienPresteveienFossveien DragveienHøvikveienSnoveien KrokvoldenStabekk kinoClausenbakkenTrudvangveienJar skole LillengveienLysaker Skøyen stasjonSkøyen Første first 0519 0521 0522 0524 0525 0526 0528 0530 0531 0532 0534 0535 0536 0537 0538 0541 0544 0547 0534 0536 0537 0539 0540 0541 0543 0545 0546 0547 0549 0550 0551 0552 0553 0556 0559 0602 0549 0551 0552 0554 0555 0556 0558 0600 0601 0602 0604 0605 0606 0607 0608 0611 0614 0617 0604 0606 0607 0609 0610 0611 0613 0615 0616 0617 0619 0620 0621 0622 0623 0626 0629 0632 0619 0621 0622 0624 0625 0626 0628 0630 0631 0632 0634 0635 0636 0637 0638 0641 0644 0647 Fra from 0631 0633 0634 0636 0637 0638 0640 0642 0643 0644 0646 0647 0648 0649 0650 0653 0656 0659 Hvert every 41 43 44 46 47 48 50 52 53 54 56 57 58 59 00 03 06 09 10 min 51 53 54 56 57 58 00 02 03 04 06 07 08 09 10 13 16 19 01 03 04 06 07 08 10 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 23 26 29 11 13 14 16 17 18 20 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 33 36 39 21 23 24 26 27 28 30 32 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 43 46 49 31 33 34 36 37 38 40 42 43 44 46 47 48 49 50 53 56 59 Til to 0851 0853 0854 0856 0857 0858 0900 0902 0903 0904 0906 0907 0908 0909 0910 0913 0916 0919
    [Show full text]
  • Annual and Sustainability Report 2018
    Annual and Sustainability Report 2018 We build for a better society. B Skanska Annual and Sustainability Report 2018 Operations Skanska’s operations consist of Construction and Project Development, including Residential Development, Commercial Property Development and, until 2018, Infrastructure Development. Business units within these streams collaborate in various ways, creating operational and financial synergies that generate increased value. Residential Commercial Property Infrastructure Construction Development Development Development 1 Constructs and renovates build- Develops new residential projects, Develops customer-focused office Secures and manages the value ings, infrastructure and homes, including single and multi-family buildings, shopping centers and of Skanska’s existing public- along with facilities manage- housing, built by the Construction logistics properties built by the private partnership (PPP) assets. ment and other related services. business stream. Construction business stream. 1 As of January 1, 2019, Infrastructure Development is no longer a business stream and is reported in Central on a separate line. Well diversified, Percentage of total revenue in 2018 with a leading market position Skanska’s diversification across various business streams with operations in eleven countries and several market segments strengthens the Group’s 40% SwedenSweden competitive standing and ensures FinlandFinland Norway a balanced and diversified risk profile. USA 38% Denmark United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic SlovakiaSlovakia Hungary 22% Romania Green revenue in 2018 Green market value in 2018 Green financing in 2018 Percentage of total Construction revenue Percentage of Commercial Property Percentage of total central debt 3 that is that is Green and Deep green, as defined Development market value from Green Green, according to the Skanska Green by the Skanska Color Palette™ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining NMT As Part of the NATM SCL Debate, Barton. N
    Defining NMT as part of the NATM SCL debate Sep 2012 Nick Barton, International tunnelling consultant, Oslo/SãoPaulo In response to Feedback to the TunnelTalk NATM and SCL article earlier this month, I suggested the addition of NMT to the pool of tunnelling method names. If we are seeking definitions, as per the longer Feedback definition of SCL contributed to the original article (Rekindled NATM debate - SCL debate opens - TunnelTalk, Aug 2012), then let me try defining and describing NMT a bit more thoroughly, as it is very different from NATM and quite different from SCL. The desk of NMT development The Norwegian Method of Tunnelling (NMT) has as one might expect from the name, an origin mostly from Norway. Numerous case records, eventually more than 1,250, were also finally mostly from Norway, but many of the early cases were from Sweden. It is this (and numerous single-shell caverns from many other countries too) that stimulated the original development of the Q-system of rock mass classification and tunnel support class definition. Q was developed in response to a State owner's question - 'why so variable deformations in Norwegian powerhouse caverns'? The Q-system was always based on economic 'single shell' tunnel and cavern reinforcement and support concepts, for mostly hard jointed rock, which however can often be faulted and have numerous clay- bearing joints and major clay-filled discontinuities. Sometimes solutions are needed for swelling clays as well. All of the above explains why the combination B+S(fr) (rockbolting and fibre reinforced shotcrete) is needed, as both the internal friction and the cohesive strength of the rock mass may be inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Resultater
    TINESTAFETTEN 2011 NADDERUD STADION ÅPEN KLASSE BARNESKOLEN NR. TID STARTNR. SKOLE 1 4,22,1 13 Stabekk 2 4,33,7 26 Stabekk 3 4,38,3 25 Stabekk 4 4,40,8 8 Løkeberg 5 4,43,1 16 Eikeli 6 4,49,1 21 Løkeberg 7 4,50,0 53 Jar 8 4,50,4 7 Høvik 9 4,53,8 10 Montessori 10 4,55,6 140 Jar 11 4,56,1 141 Jar 12 5,07,1 23 Skui 13 5,07,2 9 Løkeberg 14 5,08,8 52 Jar 15 5,10,8 36 Jar 16 5,11,8 6 Høvik 17 5,12,4 11 Skui 18 5,15,8 19 Høvik 19 5,16,7 12 Skui 20 5,18,6 5 Eiksmarka 21 5,20,3 31 Gullhaug 22 5,24,1 125 Hosle 23 5,26,7 20 Høvik 24 5,28,9 3 Eikeli 25 5,33,1 17 Eiksmarka 26 5,37,1 22 Skui 27 5,43,2 4 Eiksmarka 28 5,46,3 18 Eiksmarka 29 5,55,3 14 Bryn 6. trinn NR. TID STARTNR. SKOLE 1 4,24,0 118 Hosle 2 4,24,8 123 Snarøya 3 4,27,8 34 Høvik 4 4,29,4 90 Levre 5 4,29,5 100 Haslum 6 4,31,5 114 Bryn 7 4,32,3 110 Gullhaug 8 4,33,5 35 Høvik Verk 9 4,34,1 109 Emma Hjort 10 4,35,7 83 Haslum 11 4,40,0 45 Bærums Verk 12 4,40,8 50 Høvik 13 4,41,3 59 Steinerskolen 14 4,41,5 116 Eiksmarka 15 4,41,7 43 Stabekk 16 4,55,8 27 Bryn 17 4,41,8 57 Skui 17 4,41,8 60 Tanum 19 4,42,8 122 Løkeberg 20 4,42,9 91 Lysaker 21 4,43,3 44 Bryn 22 4,43,7 71 Løkeberg 23 4,44,2 55 Løkeberg 24 4,44,5 121 Levre 25 4,47,1 49 Hosle 25 4,47,1 74 Stabekk 27 4,48,4 128 Jar 28 4,48,9 117 Emma Hjort 29 4,49,8 42 Tanum 30 4,49,9 47 Eiksmarka 31 4,50,6 112 Lysaker 32 4,51,1 51 Høvik Verk 32 4,51,1 111 Haslum 34 4,51,7 61 Bryn 35 4,54,4 29 Eikeli 36 4,55,4 46 Eikeli 37 4,55,5 28 Bærums Verk 37 4,55,5 84 Hosle 39 4,55,8 103 Jar 40 4,56,3 67 Høvik 41 4,56,8 102 Høvik Verk 42 4,56,9 120 Jar 43 4,57,4
    [Show full text]
  • Resultatliste
    Resultatliste Skolesprint 2017 24.05.2017 Plass Navn Klubb Startnr Tid Etter Km-tid G 1 Michael Meling Høvik Verk 907 13:57 2 Sebastian Hagan Evje 1246 14:00 00:03 3 Thorvald Veire Haslum 1148 14:22 00:25 4 Henrik Glomsaker Haslum 1149 14:24 00:27 5 Simon Tegnander Evje 1260 14:44 00:47 6 Magnuns Moltzau Fjeltvedt Evje 1245 15:01 01:04 7 Martin Kielland Hov Eikeli 924 15:02 01:05 8 Daniel Aamodt Eikeli 925 15:08 01:11 9 Leo Olafsson Eikeli 917 15:27 01:30 10 Ola Aarnes-Grandre Eikeli 921 15:44 01:47 11 Patrick Aleksander Mathisen Eikeli 912 15:55 01:58 12 Michael Sandeman-Kiste Hosle 963 15:59 02:02 13 Alexander John Barstad Løkeberg 1092 16:19 02:22 14 August Mørup Andersen Evje 1250 16:25 02:28 15 Eivind Urnes Berg Evje 1251 16:28 02:31 16 Marcus Hauge Cheyne Haslum 1131 16:29 02:32 17 Andreas Waldjac Honerud Hosle 971 16:40 02:43 18 Marius Skattum Bastiansen Eikeli 931 16:52 02:55 19 David Luangtep Vangen Hosle 970 16:56 02:59 20 Aksel Kanli Grav 893 16:57 03:00 21 Robert Fagervik Høvik 1265 16:58 03:01 22 Jonas Paxal Vestnes Hosle 1036 17:06 03:09 23 August Løvbukten Haslum 1130 17:07 03:10 24 Oscar Vincent Thue Hosle 1033 17:08 03:11 25 Oscar Røine Lesterud 1004 17:21 03:24 26 Nicolay Sorknes Blume Hosle 988 17:26 03:29 27 Mats Øygard Rykkinn 1169 17:36 03:39 28 William Webb Høvik Verk 916 17:38 03:41 29 Oskar Fykerud Løkeberg 1109 17:43 03:46 30 Ola Noreng Carlsson Løkeberg 1116 17:45 03:48 30 Magnus Nagelgaard Høvik 1264 17:45 03:48 32 Oskar Finholdt Rykkinn 1214 17:46 03:49 33 Oskar Bekkevold Haslum 1175 17:49 03:52 34 Henrik Schultz Lind Hosle 1045 17:51 03:54 35 Christopher Armand Statle Haslum 1176 17:54 03:57 36 Andrew Win Evje 1272 17:55 03:58 37 Tobias Nystad Skeie Grav 902 17:56 03:59 38 Thomas R.H.
    [Show full text]