DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 6 Appendix F1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 6 Appendix F1 Appendix F Flood Mitigation Plan Santa Rosa County, Florida Flood Mitigation Plan A Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan for: The City of Gulf Breeze The Town of Jay The City of Milton and Santa Rosa County, Florida Produced by the Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Task Force November 2009; updated by SRC November 2015 In cooperation with: CRS Max Consultants, Inc. The experts in CRS rate improvement Coconut Creek, Florida Santa Rosa County, Florida Flood Mitigation Plan Produced by the Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Task Force November 2009; updated by SRC November 2015 In cooperation with: CRS Max Consultants, Inc. The experts in CRS rate improvement Coconut Creek, Florida Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section Number Topic - Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Background and Purpose 2.1 Consistency with the Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy 2.2 Consistency with the Community Rating System Floodplain Management Planning Process 2.3 Consistency with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 2.4 Flood Mitigation Assistance Program Grants Section 3 The Planning Process 3.1 Organize to Prepare the Plan 3.2 Involve the Public 3.3 Public Meetings in Affected Areas 3.4 Questionnaire Distributed to the Public 3.5 Comments and Recommendations Solicited From Local Stakeholders 3.6 Explain the Planning Process to the Public 3.7 Other Information Activities to Encourage Public Input 3.8 Solicitation of Input on the Draft Action Plan Section 4 Coordination with Other Agencies 4.1 Needs, Goals and Plans 4.2 Solicitation of Input from Other Agencies and Organizations 4.3 Meetings with Other Agencies and Organizations Section 5 Assessment of the Hazard 5.1 Types of Flooding 5.1.1 Riverine Flooding 5.1.2 Coastal Surge 5.1.3 Overland Sheet Flow and Ponding 5.2 Flood Hazards 5.2.1 Tropical Cyclones 5.2.2 Thunderstorms 5.2.3 Probability of Future Events 5.2.4 Mitigative Techniques Employed to Reduce Vulnerabilities to Flood Hazards 5.3 Flood Insurance Rate Map 5.3.1 Flood Insurance Rate Map Modernization Program 5.4 Previous Flooding Section 6 Assessment of the Problem 6.1 Vulnerability Assessment - City of Gulf Breeze 6.2 Vulnerability Assessment - Town of Jay 6.3 Vulnerability Assessment - City of Milton 6.4 Repetitive Loss Properties 6.4.1 Repetitive Loss Claims 6.4.2 Flood Insurance Claim History and Repetitive loss Properties in Unincorporated Santa Rosa County 6.4.3 Repetitive Loss Areas in Unincorporated Santa Rosa County 6.4.4 Flood Insurance Claim History Repetitive Loss Properties in the City of Milton 6.4.5 Flood Insurance Claim History and Repetitive Loss Properties in the City of Gulf Breeze 6.4.6 Flood Insurance Claim History Repetitive Loss Properties in the Town of Jay Section 6 6.5 Flood Insurance Claims 6.6 Impact of Flooding 6.6.1 Impact on Health and Safety 6.6.2 Impact on Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section Number Topic 6.6.3 Impact on the Economy and Tax Base 6.6.4 Impact on the Population 6.7 Existing Built Environment Exposed to Flooding 6.8 Current and Future Vulnerability Based on Land Use 6.9 Warning of Impending Flooding 6.10 Evacuations and Shelters 6.11 Natural and Beneficial Functions 6.12 Development and Redevelopment Section 7 Set Goals Section 8 Review of Possible Activities Section 9 Action Plan Section 10 Adoption of the Plan Section 11 Implementation, Evaluation and Revision Appendix Appendix A - Flood Mitigation Questionnaire Appendix B - Conformance with Other Plans and Documents Appendix C - Waterways of Santa Rosa County Appendix D - Storm Surge and Stormwater Problem Areas Maps Appendix E - Flood Zone Maps Appendix F - Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis Appendix G - March 2009 Flood Event Appendix H - Repetitive Loss Flood Insurance Claims Appendix I - Flood Mitigation Projects Detail Appendix J - All Flood Insurance Claims Appendix K - Critical Facilities Appendix L - Population Density Appendix M - Mobile Home Locations Appendix N - HAZUS-MH Hurricane Event Report Appendix O - Evacuations and Shelters Appendix P - Future Land Use Appendix Q - Public Information Outreach Strategy Appendix R - Post Disaster Mitigation Policy and Procedures Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Flood Mitigation Task Force Meeting Documentation Exhibit 2 - Notice of Public Meetings Exhibit 3 - Request Input From the Public in the Affected Areas Exhibit 4 - Explain the Planning Process Exhibit 5 - Other Information Activities to Encourage Public Input Exhibit 6 - Request Comments on the Draft Action Plan Exhibit 7 - Request Input From Agencies and Organizations Exhibit 8 - Review of Activities Exhibit 9 - Resolution to Adopt the Plan Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Plan Section One INTRODUCTION Santa Rosa County, Florida is located along the Gulf of Mexico in the panhandle of Northwest Florida. It covers a total of 1,174 square miles; approximately 1,017 square miles of land and 157 square miles of water. The three incorporated communities in Santa Rosa County are Milton, which is the county seat, Gulf Breeze and Jay. Unincorporated communities in the County include Chumuckla, Midway, Navarre, Navarre Beach, Oriole Beach, Bagdad and Pace. The County shares its western border with Escambia County, Florida across the Escambia River. Escambia County, Alabama borders on the north while Okaloosa County, Florida borders on the east. The southern border is the shoreline of the Gulf of Mexico. Santa Rosa County was established in 1842. Industry in the county is located in the greater Milton area. Incorporated in 1844, Milton is among the oldest cities in Florida. At that time the Blackwater River provided transportation for the timber, brick and shipbuilding industries that supported the area. Milton’s commercial opportunities were greatly expanded by the Arcadia mill and the L&N Railroad. As World War II approached, Milton was chosen as the site for NAS Whiting Field, and the community continues to embrace the service members and their families today. Milton is a progressive city that balances small town charm and modern urban life. The terrain of Santa Rosa County is varied. The southern portion is characterized mostly by sand hills and pine flatwoods with swampy areas along the rivers. The northern portion is almost exclusively rolling, forested hills with elevations reaching 300 feet. Eglin Air Force Base, in the southeastern corner of the county, is composed mostly of sand hills with swamp along the Yellow River. The five member Board of County Commissioners serves as the legislative and policy setting body for Santa Rosa County. As such, the Board enacts all legislation and authorizes programs and expenditures for the County. The Board appoints a professionally trained County Administrator, who is responsible for policy and budget development and implementation. CRS MAX CONSULTANTS, INC. November 2009; updated by SRC November 2015 Section 1 Page 1 Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Plan Section Two BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Flood mitigation plans form the foundation for a community's long-term strategy to reduce flood losses and break the cycle of flood damage, followed by reconstruction, and repeated damage. It creates a framework for risk-based decision making to reduce damages to lives, property, and the economy from future floods. Flood mitigation is sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from flooding. Local governments are required to develop a flood mitigation plan as a condition for receiving certain types of non-emergency disaster assistance. Santa Rosa County has developed a Flood Mitigation Plan that provides a comprehensive set of strategies for flood mitigation and includes a list of activities that can further mitigation goals. The purpose of this Flood Mitigation Plan is to: help reduce flood losses improve local flood hazard mitigation capability increase public and private sector awareness by educating about the hazards, loss reduction measures, and the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains address and protect cultural, economic and natural resources This Flood Mitigation Plan (FMP) is intended to accomplish this purpose and to promote a sustainable and flood-resistant community. The County’s efforts have demonstrated a strong commitment to flood mitigation and have served to minimize the impacts of flooding. There is an ongoing commitment to improvement that is further demonstrated by this plan. This Flood Mitigation Plan is intended to provide direction and to identify the actions necessary to advance the numerous facets of Santa Rosa County’s overall flood mitigation efforts. This Flood Mitigation Plan has been purposefully developed to be consistent with: the Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy 2005 – 2010 (LMS), the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System Floodplain Management Planning Process, and the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Santa Rosa County Flood Mitigation Plan Section Two, Background and Purpose 2.1 Consistency with the Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy This Plan is consistent with the Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy 2005 – 2010 (LMS), and is intended to become an appendix to the Santa Rosa County 2010- 2015 LMS (as updated November 2015). Although the 2005 – 2010 LMS included a flood mitigation section, the County determined there was a need for strengthening this component of the strategy and incorporating increased public input as part of the plan development process. 2.2 Consistency with the Community Rating System Floodplain Management Planning Process In addition to serving as a guide recommending mitigation solutions to flooding, this document has also been prepared to qualify as a “floodplain management plan” under the Community Rating System (CRS). The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) CRS was implemented in 1990 as a program for recognizing and encouraging community floodplain management activities that exceed the minimum NFIP standards. Under the CRS, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from community activities that meet the three goals of the CRS: 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation
    State of Florida State Expenditure Plan Initial SEP Program RESTORE Act Compliance SANTA ROSA COUNTY Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation PROJECT NO. 2-1 Project Description OVERVIEW AND LOCATION Financial Integrity The Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program comprises three components that will directly contribute to the restoration of water quality in Santa Rosa Sound by reducing loads of nutrients, bacteria, and heavy metals delivered to the sound. The frst two components of the program will expand the existing centralized sewer system to allow for the abandonment Overall Consistency of 758 septic systems in two areas on the Fairpoint Peninsula. The third component involves the relocation of the effuent outfall from the Navarre Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility (NBWWTF) to eliminate the discharge of up to 900,000 gallons per day (gpd) of treated effuent into Santa Rosa Sound. This program will be implemented in southeastern Santa Rosa County (see Figure 2-1A). Proposed Projects NEED AND JUSTIFICATION Santa Rosa Sound is about 35 miles long, connecting the Pensacola Bay estuary to Choctawhatchee Bay. It is bordered along much of its northern edge by the Fairpoint Peninsula and is separated from the Gulf of Mexico by Figure 2-1A. Location of Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Santa Rosa Island to the south. Santa Rosa Island is part Improvement Program components in Santa Rosa County. of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, and the associated Implementation waters of the sound are designated Outstanding Florida Waters. Santa Rosa Sound supports seagrass beds, which are important habitat and foraging areas for numerous fsh and invertebrate species, including many of commercial and recreational signifcance.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix — Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No
    RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix — Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No. 1505-0250 Applicant Name: Santa Rosa County, FL 1. MULTIYEAR PLAN VERSION (INITIAL OR AMENDMENT NUMBER): Initial 2a. DATE OF INITIAL MULTIYEAR PLAN ACCEPTANCE (mm/dd/yyyy): n/a 2b. DATE OF LAST MULTIYEAR PLAN ACCEPTANCE: n/a 3. CUMULATIVE DIRECT COMPONENT ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO APPLICANT: $5,093,598.25 4. TOTAL ALLOCATIONS PLUS KNOWN FUNDS NOT YET DEPOSITED IN TRUST FUND FOR DIRECT COMPONENT: $29,179,124.98 5. Primary Direct Component Eligible 8. Estimated Total Funding Contributions For Proposed Activity(ies)(refer to Instructions) 9. Proposed Start Date 10. Proposed End Date Activity Further Described in Application 6. Activity Title (Static Field) 7. Location (Static Field) 11. Status (refer to Instructions) 8a. Direct Component 8b. Other RESTORE Act 8c. Other Third Party 8d. Total Contribution mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy (Static Field) Contribution Contribution Contribution Infrastructure projects benefitting Dirt Road Paving Santa Rosa County, FL $525,000.00 $670,000.00 $1,195,000.00 08-2017 08-2019 the economy or ecological Districts 1, 4, 5 resources, including port infrastructure Infrastructure projects benefitting Driftwood, Navy Cove, Berry City of Gulf Breeze $356,540.00 $356,540.00 $713,080.00 08-2017 08-2019 the economy or ecological Stormwater Improvements resources, including port infrastructure Restoration and protection of the Santa Rosa County Oyster Santa Rosa County, FL $300,000.00 $25,000.00 $325,000.00 08-2017
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Security Disclosure
    MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 For the City of Miami Beach, Florida and The Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency (A Component Unit of the City of Miami Beach, Florida) MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE City of Miami Beach, Florida For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Prepared by: The City of Miami Beach Finance Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida • 33139 Tel: (305) 673 – 7466 • Fax: (305) 673 – 7795 Last updated July 13, 2020 City of Miami Beach, Florida Report of Annual Financial Information For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 This Report of Annual Financial Information is being filed with the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA), a service of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). The following is a list of all outstanding bonds and other obligations for the City of Miami Beach at September 30, 2019, in accordance with provisions regarding continuing disclosure set forth in: Outstanding Bonds Original Description Resolution Resolution Commitment Amount Number Date Date $22,500,000 Gulf Breeze Fixed Rate Loan, Series 1985E No. 2001-24500 June 26, 2001 August 1, 2001 (used to repay a portion of the outstanding principal from the Sunshine State Loan and renovation and improvement of two City owned golf courses and their related facilities), (“2001 Gulf Breeze Loan”) $62,465,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 (used No. 2003-25240 June 11, 2003 July 22, 2003 to improve neighborhood infrastructure in the City, consisting of streetscape and traffic calming measures, shoreline stabilization, Fire Safety Projects and Beaches Projects) (Note: The outstanding balance on the above City of Miami Beach, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 were fully refunded by the Series 2019 bonds at September 30, 2019.) $13,590,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans: Discursive Spaces of Safety and Resulting Environmental Injustice
    HURRICANE KATRINA AND NEW ORLEANS: DISCURSIVE SPACES OF SAFETY AND RESULTING ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Andrew B. Shears August, 2011 Dissertation written by Andrew B. Shears B.S., Ball State University, 2003 M.S., Ball State University, 2005 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2011 Approved by ____________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James A. Tyner ____________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk ____________________________________ Dr. Robert M. SchwartZ ____________________________________ Dr. Scott C. Sheridan Accepted by ____________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk ____________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………..………………………………………………….iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………vi DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………………………………………...vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..1 A. DEFINING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE………………………………………….3 B. THE GAME PLAN………………………………………………………………………..19 C. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK……………………………………………..20 II. ABOUT NEW ORLEANS……………………………………………………………………...29 A. THE HISTORY OF NEW ORLEANS……………………………………………….33 B. NEW ORLEANS IN 2005…………….……………………………………………….85 C. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………...111 III. HURRICANE KATRINA……………………………………………………………………..113
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hurricane-Tornado
    July 1965 John S. Smith 453 THEHURRICANE-TORNADO JOHN S. SMITH Weather Bureau Forecast Center, Chicago, 111. ABSTRACT Climatological data in recent years have become sufficient for the further study of tornadoes which occur in hurricane systems. Several characteristics of the hurricane tornado are determined from data for an 8-yr. period by plotting the center positions of each hurricane and its associated tornadoes. The data show: (1) a comparison betweenhurricane and non-hurricane tornadoes; (2) a “Significant Sector” fortornado-genesis; (3) a “Preferred Quadrant” of the hurricane for tornado-genesis; (4) the mostfavorable time of dayfor tornado occurrence; (5) tornado frequencies with,respect to various speeds and distances of the hurricane on and off shore; (6) a tenative hurricane model. 1. INTRODUCTION the “Preferred Quadrant.” Other significant patterns are established from the relationship of the tornado to the Although considerable research has been done on the hurricane. forecasting problemspresented byboth tornadoes and hurricanes, relatively little investigation has been made 2. GENERALCLIMATOLOGY intothe forecasting problems of tornadoesassociated with hurricanes. In this study of the hurricane-tornado Of 15 hurricanes that entered the United States from problem,a climatological analysishas been made by the Gulf of Mexico andthrough the Atlantic Coastal plottingthe center position of eachhurricane and its States, 11 produced tornadoes. Atotal of 98 tornadoes associated tornadoes. was produced during the period from hurricane Connie in August 1955, to hurricane Carla in September 1961. Of Recognition of hurricane tornadoes prior to 1955 was the hurricanes producing tornadoes, the average number apparently limited-unless therehas beensuddena of tornadoes per hurricane is 9, although hurricanes Audrey rash of hurricane-tornadoesin recent years, for since and Carla spawned more than 20 tornadoes each.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Conservation in Marine Protected Areas Conservación De
    Coral Reef Conservation in Marine Protected Areas A Case Study of Parque Nacional del Este, Dominican Republic Part 3 of 3 in a Series on Science Tools for Marine Park Management Edited by Mark Chiappone Translated into Spanish by Maria Bello and Georgina Bustamante Conservación de Arrecifes Coralinos en Áreas Marinas Protegidas Estudio del Parque Nacional del Este, República Dominicana Parte 3 de una serie de 3 documentos para el manejo de parques marinos Editado por Mark Chiappone Traducido por María Bello y Georgina Bustamante Coral(inside)-R1.id 1 11/5/01, 4:55 PM Copyright © 2001, The Nature Conservancy. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, without permission in writing from the publishers. For more information, contact: The Nature Conservancy Caribbean Division 4245 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, Virginia 22203, USA Telephone: (703) 841-4860 Coral Reef Conservation in Marine Protected Areas: A Case Study of Parque Nacional del Este, Dominican Republic ISBN: 1-886765-12-X Edited by Mark Chiappone Translated into Spanish by Maria Bello and Georgina Bustamante Cover photographs: Patrice Ceisel Layout & Design: Francisco Vasquez Published by: Publications for Capacity Building, The Nature Conservancy Headquarters, 4245 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203, USA - Tel.: (703) 841-4880, email: [email protected] This publication was made possible through support provided by the Offi ce LAC/RSD/, Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, U.S. Agency for International Development, under terms of Grant No. LAG-A-00-95-00026-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress
    Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panhandle Birding Trail
    The Great Florida Birding Trail is a project of the Florida Fish and Wildlife PANHANDLE FLORIDA Conservation Commission BIRDING TRAIL In partnership with : Wildlife Foundation of Florida U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Park Service Florida Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Many thanks to our generous sponsors : www.gulfpower.com The Great Florida Birding Trail www.nfwf.org www.FloridaBirdingTrail.com 05/06 Printed on recycled paper Getting Started... Ciity Locator Loaner optics are available free of charge at all Gateways, as well as at City Map City Map additional sites as marked in the site Apalachicola I Laguna Beach G descriptions! Bristol J Marianna F Carrabelle I Mexico Beach H Chattahoochee J Milton C Trail Tips Chipley F Panama City G When birding: Crawfordville M Pensacola B Crestview C Port St. Joe H • Take sunscreen, water and bug spray. De Funiak Springs E Quincy K • Make reservations in advance for "by-appointment Destin D Sopchoppy M only" sites. Ft. Walton Beach D St. Marks M • Check seasonality of site; are you visiting at the Grayton Beach D Sumatra I right time of year? Gulf Beach A Tallahassee L Gulf Breeze B Birder Vocabulary Some words used in this guide are specific to bird- How were these sites selected? ers and birdwatching. Bone-up on the following lingo Each of the sites in this guide was chosen for its bird- so you’ll blend in at your next birding dinner party! watching characteristics, accessibility and ability to Birding by ear: the ability to identify birds by their withstand birder use.
    [Show full text]