The Hurricane-Tornado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Hurricane-Tornado July 1965 John S. Smith 453 THEHURRICANE-TORNADO JOHN S. SMITH Weather Bureau Forecast Center, Chicago, 111. ABSTRACT Climatological data in recent years have become sufficient for the further study of tornadoes which occur in hurricane systems. Several characteristics of the hurricane tornado are determined from data for an 8-yr. period by plotting the center positions of each hurricane and its associated tornadoes. The data show: (1) a comparison betweenhurricane and non-hurricane tornadoes; (2) a “Significant Sector” fortornado-genesis; (3) a “Preferred Quadrant” of the hurricane for tornado-genesis; (4) the mostfavorable time of dayfor tornado occurrence; (5) tornado frequencies with,respect to various speeds and distances of the hurricane on and off shore; (6) a tenative hurricane model. 1. INTRODUCTION the “Preferred Quadrant.” Other significant patterns are established from the relationship of the tornado to the Although considerable research has been done on the hurricane. forecasting problemspresented byboth tornadoes and hurricanes, relatively little investigation has been made 2. GENERALCLIMATOLOGY intothe forecasting problems of tornadoesassociated with hurricanes. In this study of the hurricane-tornado Of 15 hurricanes that entered the United States from problem,a climatological analysishas been made by the Gulf of Mexico andthrough the Atlantic Coastal plottingthe center position of eachhurricane and its States, 11 produced tornadoes. Atotal of 98 tornadoes associated tornadoes. was produced during the period from hurricane Connie in August 1955, to hurricane Carla in September 1961. Of Recognition of hurricane tornadoes prior to 1955 was the hurricanes producing tornadoes, the average number apparently limited-unless therehas beensuddena of tornadoes per hurricane is 9, although hurricanes Audrey rash of hurricane-tornadoesin recent years, for since and Carla spawned more than 20 tornadoes each. 1955, the number of tornadoes reported with hurricanes Hurricane paths from the timeof occurrence of the first hasmore than tripled. It is likely thatthe reporting known to the last known tornado produced by the hur- system has improved rather than that there has been an ricane are plotted in figure l. The geographical location actual increase inthe number of hurricane-tornadoes. of thesetornadoes is shown in figure 2. These figures Data previous to 1955 weretherefore considered in- show that hurricanes moved inland wjth greater frequency sufficiently complete tobe included inthe study. through the Gdf Coast States than through the Atlantic The data sources used were the US. Weather Bureau Coast States and that tornadoes occurred in greater num- records [5, 6, 71. The criteria for inclusion in this study ber in the Gulf Coast States than in the Atlantic Coast were: (1) thetornado occurredwithin the cyclonic States. Of the tornadoes produced by these hurricanes, circulation of the hurricane; (2) some type of verification waspossible. the greater number was produced by the Gulf Coast hur- ricanes (see Appendix). In early studies, only brief statements were made with By States, Alabama ranks first with 20 hurricane-tor- thelimited data sample that wasavailable. In one of nadoes. Texasand Louisiana are second with 14 each. the earliest studies, Mitchell [l] stated that the right-rear The northern andwestern limitsof the hurricane-tornadoes quarter of thehurricane produced themost tornadoes. are Vermont and Oklahoma. The southern and eastern As the data sample increased, Dunn [2] concluded that limits are unknown, but they havebeen reported in Cuba sufficientinformation was notavailable to designate and the Bahamas[2]. which quadrant of thehurricane produced themost Table 1 shows that tornadoes occurred in all the months tornadoes. Malkin and Galway [3] stated that tornadoes of the hurricaneseason in 1955-1961, and that theseasonal had been observed only in the forward semicircle of the hurricane. As the data sample increased (tripled), more definite patterns developed and the previous remarks can now be TABLE1.-Monthly distribution of hurricanes and tornadoes during adjusted. It will be shown that an area of greatest con- the hurricane season, 1955-1961 centration of tornadoes within a hurricane can be deline- June July August September October ated.This area will be called the “Significant Sector.” It will also be shown that one quadrant of the hurricane Hurricanes.-. -... - - - 1 2 2 5 1 Tornadoes____ ~ __._...... 23 16 8 50 1 has more tornadoes than the others and thiswill be called Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/30/21 06:08 AM UTC 454 REVIEWWEATHER MONTHLY Vol. 93, No. 7 3. TORNADOCOMPARISONS In comparing hurricane and non-hurricane tornadoes, it is notedthat thenon-hurricane tornado is approximately twice as large in path length and width. Because of the conditions within a hurricane,less than half of the tornado reports included details on path length, width,direction of movement or relatedstatistics; however, thestatistics that were availableare worth noting and comparing althoughthey may changewith improved andmore numerous data. Based on 35 reports, the hurricane- tornado traveled on the ground an average distance of 7.6 mi. and had an average widthof 97 yd. The non-hurricane tornado had anaverage path lengthof 16 mi. on the ground [SI and an average width of 250 yd. [9]. The largest reported dimensions of a hurricane-tornado were alength of 35 mi.and awidth of 800 yd. These figures are an order of magnitude smaller than the largest for the non-hurricane tornado [SI. The mly apparent similarity in thestatistics of the two types of tornadoes is theirdirection of travel. The predominant direction of travel for both types was to the FIGURE1.-Approximate paths of hurricanes during the occurrence northeast (8-point scale). The second mostfrequent, of associated tornadoes, 1955-1962. Date-time groups are to the direction of movement was tothe northwest forthe nearest 6-hr. synoptic map time. hurricane-tornado as compared to an eastward direction for the non-hurricanetornado. Hailstorms reported within the vicinity of the hurricane tornadoes were rare (7 cases), but it is interesting to note that all 7 cases occurredin the right quadrants of the hurricane. Some of the hurricane centers were over land and some over sea during the occurrence of hail. The size of the hailstones ranged from gin. in diameter to thesize of golfballs. Duration of the hailstormsvaried from a few minutes to half an hour (see Appendix). 4. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HURRICANE TORNADO Spatial distribution of tornadoes associated with hur- ricanes is shown in figure 3. Distance from tornadooccur- rence tothe hurricane center was measuredfrom the location of the tornado to the hurricane’s center position at the synoptic time nearest to the time of the tornado. Quadrants were determined by the direction of the hur- ricane’smotion duringthe time of tornado occurrence. The hurricanecenter positions at synopticobservation times were considered to be more accurate and consistent than center positions given by hourly sources. The most significant information revealed by figure 3 ist,he high concentration of tornadoes (55 tornadoes- 56 percent of the cases) in the area between the radii at FIGURE2.-Known hurricane tornadoes from1955 to 1962. 30’ and 120’ from the path of the hurricane’s movement Dashed line is path of the tornado-producing hurricane model. and 100 mi. to 250 mi. from the hurricane center. This area will be referred to as the “Significant Sector” of the hurrica.ne. The SignificantSector contained the largest maximumoccurred during themonth of September. number of tornadoeswhether the hurricanecenter was Five hurricanes spawned 50 tornadoes during this month. over land or sea. Of the tornadoes within this area, 61 The seasonal minimum occurred in the month of October percent occurred when the hurricane centerwas over land. with one hurricane producing only one tornado. By quadrants, the maximum number (46 tornadoes- Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/30/21 06:08 AM UTC July 1965 John S. Smith 45 5 PATH OF HURRICANE MOVEMENT PATHOF HURRICANEMOVEMENT LEFT FRONT RIGHT FRONT LEFT FRONTOUADRANTLEFT RIGHTOUADRANT FRONT QUADRANT QUADRANT M ,” LEFTQUADRANT REAR RIGHTQUADRANT REAR FIGURE4.-Each quadrant’s tornadoes are plotted into four 6-hr. EYE Positions ” O time periods (alternateshaded areas). Distances of tornadoes I Over Land e are estimated in the unknown-time sectors. Time is OMT. 93 Tornodoes plotted. 5occurred beyond ihe 400-mile rodius FIGURE3.-Tornadoes associated with hurricanes (1955-1962) with reference to center and direction of movement of the hurricanes. rant’s tornadoes were plotted into four 6-hr. time sectors Hurricane center positions at sea and over land are shownby open (fig. 4) to determine the most favorable time period per and solid circles respectively. Range marks are 50 n. mi. apart. “Significant Sector” (shadedarea) contains 56percent of the quadrant.The time sectors marked “unknown”were tornadoes. used when tornadoobservation times were reported as late afternoon, etc. Distances from tornado to hurricane center were estimated from the tornado location to the 51 percent) occurred inthe right-front quadrant. This nearest 6-hr. position of the hurricane. quadrant is therefore designated at the“Preferred Optimum time frequency per quadrant is most clearly Quadrant.”Fifty percent of thetornadoes in the Pre- defined bythe cluster of tornadoesin the right rear ferredQuadrant occured duringthe hurricane’s, move- quadrant between
Recommended publications
  • Historical Changes in the Mississippi-Alabama Barrier Islands and the Roles of Extreme Storms, Sea Level, and Human Activities
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE MISSISSIPPI-ALABAMA BARRIER ISLANDS AND THE ROLES OF EXTREME STORMS, SEA LEVEL, AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES Robert A. Morton 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞20'0"N Horn Island 30∞20'0"N Petit Bois Island 30∞16'0"N 30∞16'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 2005 2005 1996 Dauphin Island 1996 2005 1986 1986 30∞16'0"N Kilometers 30∞14'0"N 0 1 2 3 4 5 1966 30∞16'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1950 Kilometers 1917 0 1 2 3 4 5 1917 1848 1849 30∞14'0"N 30∞14'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞10'0"N 30∞10'0"N 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W 30∞16'0"N Cat Island Ship Island 30∞16'0"N 2005 30∞14'0"N 1996 30∞14'0"N 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞14'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1917 1848 Fort 2005 Massachusetts 1995 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞12'0"N 1950 30∞12'0"N 1917 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 1848 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W Open-File Report 2007-1161 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL HURRICANES in SOUTH CAROLINA September 10-22, 1989 N Average, South Carolina Experiences a Land-Falling Hurricane Hurricane Hugo Every Seven Years
    HISTORICAL HURRICANES IN SOUTH CAROLINA September 10-22, 1989 n average, South Carolina experiences a land-falling hurricane Hurricane Hugo every seven years. Between 1900 and 2000, 14 hurricanes Time of Landfall: 12 a.m., 9/22/1989 Saffir/Simpson Scale Category: Category 4 Omade landfall along the coast of South Carolina including three Location of Landfall: Sullivans Island, SC Estimated U.S. Damage Costs: $7 billion major hurricanes: Hurricane Hugo (1989), Hurricane Gracie (1959), Maximum Winds at Landfall: 140 mph Estimated U.S. Deaths: 49 and Hurricane Hazel (1954). These South Carolina hurricanes made the Minimum Pressure at Landfall: 27.58” (934 mb) Estimated Storm Surge: 18-20 feet Top 40 Most Intense Hurricanes in a study by scientists at the National Hurricane Center. Rankings were based on minimum central pressures SUMMARY at the time of landfall. Hugo ranked #11 on the list, followed by Hazel Hugo originated off the coast of western Africa near the Cape Verde Islands as a tropical disturbance on September 9th and quickly gained strength to a tropical storm on the 11th and hurricane on the 13th. Hugo reached maximum intensity at Category 5 on the 15th with winds estimated at 160 mph and a minimum pressure of 918 mb east of the Leeward Islands. at #13, and Gracie at #33. Although major hurricanes are rare for the The hurricane passed directly over the islands of Guadaloupe, St. Croix, and Puerto Rico over the next few days before heading northwestward toward the South Carolina coast. By 6 a.m. coastal sections of South Carolina, averaging one every 25 years, the EDT on September 21, 1989, hurricane warnings were issued for coastal South Carolina and more than 250,000 people evacuated the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Coastal Environment
    Preface The South Carolina Beachfront Management Act In the Beginning The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1977 was enacted to protect our coastal resources from unwise development. This legislation served the beaches well during its first decade, but as South Carolina became a more popular tourist destination, it became apparent that the portion of the Act that dealt with beaches was inadequate. As development crept seaward, seawalls and rock revetments proliferated, damaging the public’s beach. In many areas there was no beach left at high tide. In some areas, there was no beach at low tide, either. In 1988 and again in 1990, South Carolina’s legislators took action and amended and strengthened the Coastal Zone Management Act. The resulting Beachfront Management Act protects South Carolina’s sandy shores by increasing the state’s jurisdiction and encouraging development to move landward. South Carolina’s Beachfront Jurisdiction To find the boundaries of this jurisdiction, staff from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management must first locate the baseline, which is the crest of the primary oceanfront sand dune. Where there are no dunes, the agency uses scientific methods to determine where the natural dune would lie if natural or man-made occurrences had not interfered with nature’s dune building process. The setback line is the most landward boundary and is measured from the baseline. To find the depth of the setback line, the beach’s average annual erosion rate for the past forty years is calculated and multiplied by forty. For example, if the erosion rate is one foot per year, the results will be a setback line that stretches forty feet from the baseline.
    [Show full text]
  • BERNAL-THESIS-2020.Pdf (5.477Mb)
    BROWNWOOD: BAYTOWN’S MOST HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD by Laura Bernal A thesis submitted to the History Department, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Chair of Committee: Dr. Monica Perales Committee Member: Dr. Mark Goldberg Committee Member: Dr. Kristin Wintersteen University of Houston May 2020 Copyright 2020, Laura Bernal “A land without ruins is a land without memories – a land without memories is a land without history.” -Father Abram Joseph Ryan, “A Land Without Ruins” iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, and foremost, I want to thank God for guiding me on this journey. Thank you to my family for their unwavering support, especially to my parents and sisters. Thank you for listening to me every time I needed to work out an idea and for staying up late with me as I worked on this project. More importantly, thank you for accompanying me to the Baytown Nature Center hoping to find more house foundations. I am very grateful to the professors who helped me. Dr. Monica Perales, my advisor, thank you for your patience and your guidance as I worked on this project. Thank you to my defense committee, Dr. Kristin Wintersteen and Dr. Goldberg. Your advice helped make this my best work. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Debbie Harwell, who encouraged me to pursue this project, even when I doubted it its impact. Thank you to the friends and co-workers who listened to my opinions and encouraged me to not give up. Lastly, I would like to thank the people I interviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans: Discursive Spaces of Safety and Resulting Environmental Injustice
    HURRICANE KATRINA AND NEW ORLEANS: DISCURSIVE SPACES OF SAFETY AND RESULTING ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Andrew B. Shears August, 2011 Dissertation written by Andrew B. Shears B.S., Ball State University, 2003 M.S., Ball State University, 2005 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2011 Approved by ____________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James A. Tyner ____________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk ____________________________________ Dr. Robert M. SchwartZ ____________________________________ Dr. Scott C. Sheridan Accepted by ____________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk ____________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………..………………………………………………….iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………vi DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………………………………………...vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..1 A. DEFINING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE………………………………………….3 B. THE GAME PLAN………………………………………………………………………..19 C. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK……………………………………………..20 II. ABOUT NEW ORLEANS……………………………………………………………………...29 A. THE HISTORY OF NEW ORLEANS……………………………………………….33 B. NEW ORLEANS IN 2005…………….……………………………………………….85 C. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………...111 III. HURRICANE KATRINA……………………………………………………………………..113
    [Show full text]
  • City of League City
    CITY OF DICKINSON MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF DICKINSON 07/2017 City of Dickinson Office of Emergency Management 4000 Liggio St Dickinson TX 775393 281-337-4700 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Authority .....................................................................................................................................1-2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Section I The Planning Process ....................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Plan Update ........................................................................................................3-4 Mitigation Planning Committee (MPC) ............................................................................................4-5 Public Participation .......................................................................................................................... 6 Announcement of Hazard Mitigation Survey ...................................................................................... 7 Hazard Mitigation Survey Form ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6B.3 Synoptic Composites of the Extratropical Transition Lifecycle of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones: Factors Determining Post-Transition Evolution
    6B.3 SYNOPTIC COMPOSITES OF THE EXTRATROPICAL TRANSITION LIFECYCLE OF NORTH ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONES: FACTORS DETERMINING POST-TRANSITION EVOLUTION Robert E. Hart1, Jenni L. Evans2, and Clark Evans1 1Department of Meteorology, Florida State University 2Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY Over the past five years, the extratropical a. Datasets transition (ET) lifecycle has been defined based upon Storm composites performed here were satellite signatures (Klein et al. 2000) and objective based upon 1°×1° resolution Navy Operational measures of dynamic and thermal structure (Evans Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS; and Hart 2003). Following ET, tropical cyclones Hogan et al. 1991) operational analyses for the period (TCs) can become explosive cold-core cyclones, 1998-2003. During these six years, 34 Atlantic TCs explosive warm-seclusion cyclones, or simply decay underwent resolvable ET as diagnosed within the as a cold-core cyclone (Hart 2003; Evans and Hart cyclone phase space (CPS) 2003). Each of these three evolution paths has (http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase). dramatically different wind and precipitation field b. Methodology (Bosart et al. 2001), and ocean wave (Bowyer 2000; i. Normalizing the ET timeline Bowyer and Fogarty 2003) responses associated with The ET lifecycle defined in Evans and Hart it. Furthermore, the envelope of realized intensity is (2003) is used here, with the beginning of ET fundamentally related to the structure obtained after (labeled as TB) as the time when the storm becomes ET (Hart 2003), so incorrect forecasts of storm significantly asymmetric (B>10) and end of ET structure have the effect of also degrading the (labeled as TE) the time when the lower-tropospheric L intensity forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • 0604830570Whartonfloodmitiga
    March 28, 2008 AVO 22650 Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231 Austin, Texas 78711-3231 Attention: Mr. Gilbert R. Ward, CPG, Hydrologist RE: Wharton County, Texas Flood Mitigation Plan Dear Mr. Ward: On behalf of Wharton County and the cities of East Bernard, El Campo and Wharton and the Wharton County Flood Mitigation Planning Committee, Halff Associates, Inc. is submitting five (5) copies and one (1) CD of the Wharton County Flood Mitigation Plan that has been formally adopted by Wharton County Commissioners Court and the City Councils of East Bernard, El Campo and Wharton. Building on the planning efforts funded by TWDB, Wharton County and participating communities have initiated several of the flood mitigation actions identified in the enclosed Flood Mitigation Plan: • Wharton County, the City of El Campo and LCRA have installed additional Elevation Reference Marks (ERM’s) in developing areas in Wharton County where no FEMA or NGS marks are located. • With TWDB Flood Protection Planning Grant funding, Wharton County has initiated the county-wide Drainage Master Plan and the San Bernard River Watershed Study. • The City of El Campo has initiated a Drainage Study to compliment the Wharton County Drainage Master Plan. • Wharton County and Matagorda County have begun a coordinated effort to address drainage problems on watersheds shared by the two counties. • The TCRFC has initiated planning efforts for the 5-year update of the TCRFC all-hazards Mitigation Plan that includes Wharton County. The Wharton County Flood Mitigation Actions identified in the attached Plan will be incorporated into the TCRFC all-hazards Mitigation Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Investors As You May Might Have Heard from Different Media Outlets
    Dear investors As you may might have heard from different media outlets, the east coast of the U.S. is facing a potential threat of landfall of the major hurricane named Florence in the coming days. The storm is currently about 385 miles/620 KM southwest of BERMUDA and about 625 miles/1005 KM southeast of Cape Fear North CAROLINA, moving to the direction of North and South Carolina. The intensity is currently Cat 4, with maximum sustained wind speed very close to 140 mph. As the storm moves to the coast, the wind will intensify to Cat 5 and maximum sustained winds can reach 155 mph. Timing is more difficult to predict now as many meteorologists suggest Florence will slow on approach to the coast, with a possible stalling that could exacerbate the impacts for the area it nears the shore. Catastrophe risk modeller RMS said, “Florence will be the strongest hurricane to make landfall over North Carolina since Hazel in 1954 – this would be a major event for the insurance industry. As with all hurricanes of this intensity, Florence poses significant impacts due to damaging hurricane-force winds and coastal storm surge, but inland flooding is becoming an increasing threat. Forecasts include the possibility of Florence slowing down after landfall and causing as much as 20 inches of rain in the Carolinas. While very significant, this remains much lower than the amount of rainfall observed last year during Hurricane Harvey.” Wind Florence is expected to make landfall as a hurricane between Cat 3 and Cat 4. The wind speed can reach 110-130 mph and central pressure is estimated 962mb.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]