DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Aut 02.Pmd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Aut 02.Pmd interview On Prudence and Restraint in Foreign Policy Susan Windybank talks to Owen Harries wen Harries was, until July 2001, the founding to Right. In a profile of you published in The Bulletin Editor-in-Chief of the influential, Washington- in 1984, you were described as a ‘left-wing Laborite’ Obased, foreign policy journal, The National who became a ‘star in the American right’. When did Interest. The journal rose to mainstream prominence with you begin to change? the publication of Francis Fukuyama’s ‘The End of History?’ in the summer of 1989, although it was no OH: You must remember that I grew up in a South stranger to spirited debate—in the very first issue, Harries Wales mining valley during the Depression, in a place ran an article by publisher Irving Kristol dismissing the that at one point had an unemployment level of 57%. very concept of ‘national interest’ as ‘dead beyond I don’t think I saw a live conservative for the first 20 resurrection’. years of my life. It was only after I came to Australia to Born in Wales, and educated at the University of Wales take up a teaching position in adult education at the and Oxford, Harries taught at both the University of Department of Tutorial Studies at Sydney University Sydney and New South Wales, before becoming Senior that I really started moving away from a leftist position. Advisor to shadow Foreign Affairs Minister, Andrew I had Harry Eddy on one side and Esmond Higgins, Peacock, in 1974. He then successively became head of who was an ex-leading member of the Australian policy planning in the Department of Foreign Affairs, Communist Party, on the other. In a small department, and Senior Advisor to former Prime Minister Malcolm I was a new factor that was fought over, so to speak. Fraser. The director and co-author of an influential study of Australia’s relations with the Third World, dubbed ‘The SW: Who ended up converting you? Harries Report’, he was appointed Australian Ambassador to UNESCO in 1982. He then joined leading US think OH: I think largely myself, though Harry Eddy was tank, The Heritage Foundation, as a Visiting Fellow, before certainly influential. He was an ex-Trotskyist who had founding The National Interest in 1985. moved away to become a very strong anti-communist. Once described as a ‘man who enjoys talk the way He was polemically very powerful and he just out-argued others enjoy football’, Owen Harries recently returned to me. At least I had the sense to realise I was being out- Australia. He is now a Senior Fellow at The Centre for argued, and I started to shift. Independent Studies. He remains Consulting Editor and Editor Emeritus of The National Interest. SW: Despite this shift, you voted for Whitlam in 1972. What was it that attracted you to Whitlam? SW: Given that this issue of Policy contains several articles exploring the use—and misuse—of labels, I would like to begin by discussing your shift from Left Susan Windybank is Editor of Policy. Autumn 2002 27 ON PRUDENCE AND RESTRAINT IN FOREIGN POLICY OH: It was more push than pull. It was the push of Calvert, who is currently head of the department, wrote Billy McMahon. I felt it was impossible to vote for him. some chapters in it. Des Moore was influential on the The Liberals had a very bad spell. They were split economic side. It was a very good, very enjoyable year. internally. Gorton had been a mixed bag, and We worked intensely. It involved interviewing McMahon was really bad. At that time I was running a extensively, and sorting out internally on the committee. television programme on Channel Nine and I was We only had one member who dissented. Everything interviewing people every week. One week I interviewed else we managed to resolve without smoothing it all Gough and at the end of the programme in the makeup out into a bland custard. room I told him that at the next election I was going to vote for him. And he said, ‘Well, Owen, if you’re going SW: You went on to become Senior Advisor to Malcolm to vote for me, I’m going to win.’ Fraser, before accepting the post of Australian Ambassador to UNESCO. How long were you at SW: Within a few years of voting for Whitlam you were UNESCO? advising shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, Andrew Peacock, before becoming head of policy planning in OH: I was at UNESCO for about a year and a half. I the Department of Foreign Affairs. During that time, went there at the beginning of 1982, but then Malcolm you largely wrote the Report of the Fraser lost the election in 1983. As a Committee on Australia’s Relations political appointee I was required to with the Third World, which became submit my resignation, and the Labor widely known as ‘the Harries report’. I spent a very Party wanted to find somewhere for Why did the government feel that such happy year and Gough Whitlam to get him out of a report was needed, and what was the Australia. So I offered my resignation, reaction to it? a half getting it was accepted, and I left. And then it America and was a question of what I was going to OH: You must remember that from Britain to do. I didn’t particularly want to go back 1973, when OPEC made its first move and teach at the University of New and forced up the price of oil, when withdraw from South Wales. I had already become America was very much on the defensive UNESCO. pretty disillusioned at what was after Vietnam and Watergate, the Third happening to universities, so some World was at its most militant. It was friends suggested I went to riding high, it was exerting a lot of pressure on the West, Washington. I joined a think tank there, the Heritage and in those circumstances, it was felt—by Peacock and Foundation, where I spent a very happy year and a half Fraser—that Australia was particularly vulnerable as a getting America and Britain to withdraw from sort of outpost of the West with a lot of Third World UNESCO. neighbours. It was rightly felt that we needed to give serious consideration to what all this meant. SW: On what grounds? As for the reaction to it, it was very favourable, though not uniformly so. There were some attacks on OH: That under its director general, M’Bow, it was it from the Left, but by and large it got a very good corrupt, that it was grossly inefficient, and that it was press indeed. It was pointed out that this was the first grossly anti-Western. America and Britain were paying time that a report like this, a serious intellectual report, to get their values undermined and attacked. Even by had been produced by an Australian government on UN standards, UNESCO was pretty outrageous, and I the question of foreign policy. The British Foreign Office always argued that even those who believed in the UN was very interested in it, and I conducted a seminar on should have wanted to criticise and attack UNESCO it for them in London. The Japanese seriously thought because it was giving the UN a bad name. of translating it into Japanese. So it was pretty much a success. Let me emphasise that while I chaired it, and wrote ON PRUDENCE AND RESTRAINT something like over half of it, there were a lot of other important contributions from other people. Ashton SW: How would you describe yourself now? 28 Policy vol. 18, no. 1 ON PRUDENCE AND RESTRAINT IN FOREIGN POLICY OH: I would describe myself as a conservative. New Order, to impose its will on the world, to promote democracy very actively. SW: What’s the difference between a neoconservative Now I had two serious objections to this. One was and a conservative? that it is not doable. Democracy is not an export commodity. It’s much more a do-it-yourself project. OH: Irving Kristol famously described a neoconservative Americans should have realised this because for several as a liberal who’d been mugged by reality, and I guess generations they had been using their influence in the there’s an element of that. But I think I became Carribbean and Central America, right next door to increasingly aware that, as compared with a lot of the them and with very small countries, and even there they neoconservatives that I worked amongst and that I had couldn’t do it. So why they thought they could do it as colleagues and friends in America, my position tended elsewhere in the world was a bit mysterious. Also, I more towards what you might call classical don’t think the United States is particularly good at conservatism. After the Cold War ended, a lot of the understanding other cultures and other societies. neoconservatives reverted to their liberalism, particularly The other thread of the argument is that if you are in foreign policy, whereas I didn’t. In the sole remaining superpower, you fact, conditions after the Cold War should be very careful and restrained tended to strengthen my realist, in the use of your power. As anyone conservative approach to foreign policy. Democracy is who has studied international history I think I spent most of the 1990s not an export and politics knows, the fate of arguing not against the Left but against dominant powers that are very active the neoconservatives, arguing for commodity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lee Kuan Yew the Press GalleryS Love Affair with Mr Keating Interviewed by Owen Harries Looks Like ItS Over
    INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS LIMITED (Incorporated in the ACT) ISSN 1030 4177 IPA REVIEW Vol. 43 No. I June-August 1989 ki Productivity: the Prematurely r Counted Chicken John Brunner New figures show that plans for a national wage 2 IPA Indicators rise based on productivity gains are misplaced. In 30 years government expenditure per head in Australia has more than doubled. 13 Industrial Relations: the British Alternative 3 Editorials Joe Thompson The death throes of communism will be long and painful. Economic reform in Australia is moving The "British disease" has become a thing of the too slowly. Mr Keating on smaller government. past. Now Australia should take the cure. 8 - Press Index E Lee Kuan Yew The press gallerys love affair with Mr Keating Interviewed by Owen Harries looks like its over. Mr Macphee wins hearts, but Singapores experienced and astute PM on issues not where it counts. ranging from Gorbachev to regional trade. 11 Defending Australia 32 Myth and Reality in the Conservation Harry Gelber Debate The massacre in Beijing has burst the bubble of Ian Hore-Lacy illusion surrounding China. A cool assessment of the facts in an emotional debate. 16 Around the States Les McCaffrey 38 Big Governments Threat to the Rule If governments want investment they must stop of Law forever changing the rules. Denis White Youth Affairs How regulations can undermine the law. 25 Cliff Smith 48 Militarism and Ideology One hundred young Australians debate their Michael Walker countrys future. For Marxists in power the armed struggle continues. 26 Strange Times Ken Baker 50 Terms of Reference The Sex Pistols corrupted by capitalism; Billy John Nurick Bragg on being inspired by Leninism.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia
    BenvenutiMyth and Misrepresentation and Jones in Australian Foreign Policy Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia ✣ Andrea Benvenuti and David Martin Jones In 1960 the deputy leader of the Australian Labor Party, Gough Whitlam, declared that Australia “has for ten years missed the opportunity to interpret the new nations to the old world and the old world to the new na- tions.”1 Throughout the 1960s, Labor spokesmen attacked the foreign policy of Sir Robert Menzies’s Liberal–Country Party coalition government (1949– 1966) for both its dependence on powerful friends and its alleged insensitivity to Asian countries.2 This criticism of Liberal foreign policy not only persisted in later decades but also became the prevailing academic and media ortho- doxy.3 As we show here, Labor’s criticism constitutes the basis of a tenacious political myth that demands critical reevaluation. Menzies’s political opponents and, subsequently, his academic critics have claimed that his attitude toward Asia was permeated by suspicion and conde- scension. From the 1970s, an inchoate Labor left and academic understand- ing contended that conservative Anglo-centrism “had placed Australia on the losing side of almost every external engagement from the Suez Crisis to Viet- nam.”4 A decade later, analysts writing in the context of the Labor-driven doc- trine of “enmeshment” with Asia reinforced this emerging foreign policy or- 1. Gordon Greenwood and Norman Harper, eds., Australia in World Affairs 1956–1960 (Melbourne: Cheshire, 1963), p. 96. 2. See, for instance, Mads Clausen, “‘Falsiªed by History’: Menzies, Asia and Post-Imperial Australia,” History Compass, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • National Asset: 50 Years of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre~ANU Press
    A NATIONAL ASSET 50 YEARS OF THE STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE A NATIONAL ASSET 50 YEARS OF THE STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE EDITED BY DESMOND BALL AND ANDREW CARR Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: A national asset : 50 years of the Strategic & Defence Studies Centre (SDSC) / editors: Desmond Ball, Andrew Carr. ISBN: 9781760460563 (paperback) 9781760460570 (ebook) Subjects: Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre--History. Military research--Australia--History. Other Creators/Contributors: Ball, Desmond, 1947- editor. Carr, Andrew, editor. Dewey Number: 355.070994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents About the Book . vii Contributors . ix Foreword: From 1966 to a Different Lens on Peacemaking . xi Preface . xv Acronyms and Abbreviations . xix List of Plates . xxi 1 . Strategic Thought and Security Preoccupations in Australia . 1 Coral Bell 2 . Strategic Studies in a Changing World . 17 T.B. Millar 3 . Strategic Studies in Australia . 39 J.D.B. Miller 4 . From Childhood to Maturity: The SDSC, 1972–82 . 49 Robert O’Neill 5 . Reflections on the SDSC’s Middle Decades . 73 Desmond Ball 6 . SDSC in the Nineties: A Difficult Transition . 101 Paul Dibb 7 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2003-2004 Annual Report (Complete Report)
    through australian eyes The National Broadcaster through australian eyes Eric Campbell ANNUAL REPORT 04 australian broadcasting corporation Annual Report 2003-04 through australian eyes Over the last seven years Eric Campbell has Eric Campbell reported to Australians from some of the most remote and challenging places on earth. ‘To me, Foreign Correspondent as a journalist, being a foreign correspondent is the pinnacle. You get entrée to extraordinary people and places and to intense experiences. It’s special. You are doing something that people in other parts of the industry are not. It’s very rare to meet a reporter from another Australian network.’ His assignments have included reporting the wars in Chechnya, Afghanistan and the Balkans, tracking polar bears in the Arctic, filming at secret military bases in central Russia and travelling by sled with nomadic reindeer herders in Siberia. Eric joined the ABC in 1986 and worked with The Investigators and Quantum as well as news and current affairs. He applied for several overseas positions, ‘I spent a year learning Japanese thinking I’d probably go there’. Finally in 1996 he was given the Moscow posting for three years. He found it very interesting although, ‘when I was there it was still fairly grim—they were trying to come to terms with the new order.’ In marked contrast to correspondents from overseas networks ABC reporters operate as a compact unit—usually just the reporter and a cameraman. ‘ABC foreign correspondents are on duty 24/7. Most days are 12 to 14 hours, but if travelling, an 18-hour day is not unusual.’ Eric is writing a book about the last seven years, there are so many stories and memories and friendships.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia, the United States, and Southeast Asian Détente
    With Friends Like These: Australia, the United States, and Southeast Asian Détente Andrea Benvenuti, David Martin Jones Journal of Cold War Studies, Volume 21, Number 2, Spring 2019, pp. 27-57 (Article) Published by The MIT Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/726149 Access provided at 7 Jun 2019 05:49 GMT from UNSW Library With Friends Like These Australia, the United States, and Southeast Asian Détente ✣ Andrea Benvenuti and David Martin Jones The death of former Australian Labor Party (ALP) leader Edward Gough Whitlam in October 2014 offered an opportunity to reassess his politi- cal legacy. Most obituaries praised his tenure as prime minister (December 1972–October 1975). For Australian columnist Troy Bramston, Whitlam “was inimitable.”1 Paul Kelly, the Australian newspaper’s editor-at-large, main- tained that Whitlam “bequeathed to his successors a series of policy glories to be defended,” including “a more independent national ethos.” Indeed, “he was a rare leader who changed the nation’s direction.”2 Summarizing Whit- lam’s purported achievements, former Australian prime minister and Labor leader Paul Keating concluded that the election of Whitlam’s Labor Party to office in December 1972 released Australia “from the torpor of the Menzies era.”3 It also rescued Australia from its historic dependence on great and pow- erful friends. However, those of a more skeptical disposition found Whitlam’s achievements less impressive. Neil Brown, a columnist at the Spectator Aus- tralia and former Liberal Party deputy leader, thought Whitlam “a charmer, but a loser,” who could not exercise power.4 Australian economist Henry Er- gas argued that “Whitlam displayed a rigidity, compounded by arrogance.
    [Show full text]
  • US Withdrawal from Unesco
    U.S. WITHDRAWAL FROM UNESCO HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEES ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOEEIGN AEFAIES HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 25, 26, AND MAY 2, 1984 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. WITHDRAWAL FROM UNESCO HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEES ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOKEIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATTV^S NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 25, 26, AND MAY 2, 1984 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 34-887 O WASHINGTON : 1984 u-«ntat«-*«i COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida, Chairman LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana WILLIAM S. BROOMFIELD, Michigan GUS YATRON, Pennsylvania LARRY WINN, Jr., Kansas STEPHEN J. SOLARZ, New York BENJAMIN A. OILMAN, New York DON BONKER, Washington ROBERT J. LAGOMARSINO, California GERRY E. STUDDS, Massachusetts JOEL PRITCHARD, Washington j ANDY IRELAND, Florida JIM LEACH, Iowa . DAN MICA, Florida TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin C MICHAEL D. BARNES, Maryland OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine HOWARD WOLPE, Michigan HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois GEO. W. CROCKETT, Jr., Michigan GERALD B. H. SOLOMON, New York SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut DOUGLAS K. BEREUTER, Nebraska MERVYN M. DYMALLY, California MARK D. SILJANDER, Michigan TOM LANTOS, California ED ZSCHAU, California PETER H. KOSTMAYER, Pennsylvania ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey LAWRENCE J. SMITH, Florida HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HARRY M. REID, Nevada MEL LEVINE, California EDWARD F. FEIGHAN, Ohio TED WEISS, New York GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ROBERT GARCIA, New York John J.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Coral Bell's Alliance Politics
    12. Coral Bell’s Alliance Politics: Practitioner and Pundit William T Tow Coral Bell was Australia’s premier expert on alliance politics during and after the Cold War. Former US Secretary of State Dean Acheson’s famous book title, Present at the Creation, applies equally to this remarkable Australian figure who was both a practitioner in and pundit on this subject.1 She was ‘in the room’ as an officer with Australia’s Department of External Affairs when the ANZUS (Australia New Zealand United States) Treaty was signed in San Francisco on 1 September 1951. One of her most avid interests pursued during a subsequent and distinguished career as an academic and think-tank adviser was assessing American leadership of its global alliance system and continually evaluating how Australia fared in and should respond to Washington’s strategic policies. Her book Dependent Ally: A Study in Australian Foreign Policy (three editions were published) remains a seminal work on how Australia—one of the United States’ smaller allies—was able to calibrate its security relationship with an American superpower in ways that facilitated its maturity as an independent security actor.2 During her later years, she became increasingly preoccupied with how the Australian–American alliance would function in a world undergoing rapid structural change and where global multipolarity and great power concerts would prevail. To what extent her viewpoints will be proven to be correct or misplaced is far less important than her success in initiating the debate about international order-building which had to take place within official policy circles, think-tanks, and academe.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam
    Vietnam Generation Volume 3 Number 2 Australia R&R: Representation and Article 1 Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam 1-1991 Australia R&R: Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1991) "Australia R&R: Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol3/iss2/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THIS SITE WILL BE ERECTED A MEMORIAL FOR THOSE WHO DIED & SERVED IN THE VIETNAM WAR maoKJwmiiMisanc? wmmEsnp jnauKi«mmi KXm XHURST rw svxr Representations and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam Edited by Jeff Doyle & Jeffrey Grey Australia ReJR Representations and Reinterpretations o f Australia's war in Vietnam Edited by Jeff Doyle & Jeffrey Grey V ietnam Generation, I n c & Burning Cities Press Australia ReJR is published as a Special Issue of Vietnam Generation Vietnam Generation was founded in 1988 to promote and encourage interdisciplinary study of the Vietnam War era and the Vietnam War generation. The journal is published by Vietnam Generation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation devoted to promoting scholarship on recent history and contemporary issues. Vietnam Generation, Inc. Vice-President President Secretary, Treasurer HERMAN BEAVERS KALI TAL CYNTHIA FUCHS General Editor Newsletter Editor Technical Assistance KALI TAL DAN DUFFY LAWRENCE E HUNTER Advisory Board NANCY AN1SFIELD MICHAEL KLEIN WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and the Vietnam War: a Select Bibliography Jeffrey Grey
    Vietnam Generation Volume 3 Number 2 Australia R&R: Representation and Article 11 Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam 1-1991 Australia and the Vietnam War: A Select Bibliography Jeffrey Grey Jeff oD yle Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Grey, Jeffrey and Doyle, Jeff (1991) Aus" tralia and the Vietnam War: A Select Bibliography," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 11. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol3/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australia and Vietnam War—A Select Bibliography. Jeff Doyle and Jeffrey Grey Introduction In keeping with the wide range of concerns of the essays in this volume the bibliography has attempted to cover as many “subject headings” as seemed possible. Thus while the title “Select Bibliography” suggests that the compilers have collected only the major “texts” of concern, the following lists are an attempt to be as complete as possible at the time of final compilation. “Select” is meant to convey the fact that the editors are certain (most likely the only certainty prevailing in scholarly life) that the lists are not complete. This incompletion applies to some areas more than to others. Newspapers and the general daily print media, and their radio and television equivalent news industries are the chief areas of extreme selection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Asian Engagement: Ideas, Institutions, and Academics
    MURDOCH RESEARCH REPOSITORY This is the author’s final version of the work, as accepted for publication following peer review but without the publisher’s layout or pagination. The definitive version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2009.1522a.x Beeson, M. and Jayasuriya, K. (2009) The politics of asian engagement: Ideas, institutions, and academics. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 55 (3). pp. 360-374. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/7357/ Copyright: © 2009 School of History. It is posted here for your personal use. No further distribution is permitted. The Politics of Asian Engagement: Ideas, Institutions, and Academics MARK BEESON University of Birmingham 1 AND KANISHKA JAYASURIYA Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University The study of Australia’s Asian engagement — just as much as the history of the process itself — has been shaped by structural shifts in the international system and the global political economy as they reverberate through domestic political debates. As a consequence, ideas about Asian engagement tell us as much about the character of national political debates as they do about Australian policy-makers’ perceptions of the region. Understandings of Asia as a transnational political space are shaped by national conflicts and struggles over issues such as communism or national identity. Ideas and disputes over Australia’s relationship with Asia become closely aligned with conflict between conservative and radical academic approaches to Asia. With the end of the Cold War in the 1980s and 1990s, the triumph of neoliberalism and the waning of ideological politics of the 1960s were mirrored in academic approaches that adopted a policy or cultural approach to Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEOCONSERVATIVE MOMENT" by FRANCIS FUKUYAMA Is an Important New Essay in the Latest Edition of the National Interest
    From “The Washington Note” – by Steve C. Clemons, August 13th, 2004 "THE NEOCONSERVATIVE MOMENT" BY FRANCIS FUKUYAMA is an important new essay in the latest edition of The National Interest. The link only provides an excerpt -- but a subscription to this magazine is a cheap price to pay to read what may be the beginnings of a civil war among neoconservatives. I attended a dinner last week hosted by The National Interest and the Nixon Center featuring Francis Fukuyama discussing this article. The rules for the meeting were not presented, but I am going to respect the non-attribution rule of many such in house discussions as I want to make sure I'm invited back. It was one of the most fascinating roundtable discussions I've participated in in quite a long time. Among those in attendance at the 25 person dinner were Nixon Center President and former Nixon advisor Dimitri Simes, former Defense and Energy Secretary James Schlesinger, U.S. News and World Report's Michael Barone, Eisenhower Institute President Susan Eisenhower, former UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, Georgetown University's Charles Kupchan, former National Security Advisor Robert McFarlane, National Interest Editor John O'Sullivan, and recent Department of Defense Comptroller Dov Zakheim -- who now works in the same firm of Booz Allen and Hamilton with James Woolsey, who has received some attention in this column. I mention these folks not to name drop but to make the point that these are serious people -- most of them realists, but not all. Kupchan classifies himself as a liberal internationalist, which some think is pretty close to enlightened realism anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Fukuyama Postpones the End of History About:Reader?Url=
    Francis Fukuyama Postpones the End of History about:reader?url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/0... newyorker.com Francis Fukuyama Postpones the End of History By Louis Menand The political scientist argues that the desire of identity groups for recognition is a key threat to liberalism. 1 of 19 9/1/18 9:44 AM Francis Fukuyama Postpones the End of History about:reader?url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/0... The desire for recognition, Fukuyama argues, is an essential threat to liberalism. Illustration by Aude Van Ryn In February, 1989, Francis Fukuyama gave a talk on international relations at the University of Chicago. Fukuyama was thirty-six years old, and on his way from a job at the RAND Corporation, in Santa Monica, where he had worked as an expert on Soviet foreign policy, to a post as the deputy director of policy planning at the State Department, in Washington. It was a good moment for talking about international relations, and a good moment for Soviet experts especially, because, two months earlier, on December 7, 1988, Mikhail Gorbachev had announced, in a speech at the United Nations, that the Soviet Union would no longer intervene in the affairs of its Eastern European satellite states. Those nations could now become democratic. It was the beginning of the end of the Cold War. 2 of 19 9/1/18 9:44 AM Francis Fukuyama Postpones the End of History about:reader?url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/0... At RAND, Fukuyama had produced focussed analyses of Soviet policy.
    [Show full text]