Lee Kuan Yew the Press Gallery S Love Affair with Mr Keating Interviewed by Owen Harries Looks Like It S Over
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SENATE Official Hansard
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard THURSDAY, 27 NOVEMBER 1997 THIRTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIFTH PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE CANBERRA CONTENTS THURSDAY, 27 NOVEMBER Order of Business— Days and Hours of Sitting and Routine of Business ............. 9595 Leave of Absence ..................................... 9595 Native Title Amendment Bill 1997— Second Reading ...................................... 9595 Questions Without Notice— Native Title ......................................... 9644 Aboriginal Reconciliation ............................... 9646 Native Title ......................................... 9647 Arts Policy ......................................... 9648 Native Title ......................................... 9650 Native Title ......................................... 9652 Native Title ......................................... 9653 Greenhouse Gases .................................... 9653 Native Title ......................................... 9655 Mr Robert ‘Dolly’ Dunn ................................ 9656 Answers to Questions Without Notice— Taxation ........................................... 9657 Small Business ....................................... 9658 Fringe Benefits Tax ................................... 9658 Commonwealth Bank of Australia ......................... 9659 Current Account Data .................................. 9660 Travel Allowances .................................... 9660 Native Title ......................................... 9661 Petitions— Logging -
MS 5110 National Aboriginal Conference, National Office And
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library MS 5110 National Aboriginal Conference, National Office and Resource Centre records, 1974-1975, 1978-1985 CONTENTS COLLECTION SUMMARY .......…………………………………………………....…........ p.3 CULTURAL SENSITIVITY STATEMENT ……………………………………........... p.3 ACCESS TO COLLECTION .………………………………...…….……………….......... p.4 COLLECTION OVERVIEW ………...……………………………………..…....…..…… p.5 ADMNISTRATIVE NOTE …............………………………………...…………........….. p.6 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... p.7 SERIES DESCRIPTION ………………………………………………………..……….... p.8 Series 1 NAC, National Executive, Meeting papers, 1974-1975, 1978-1985 p.8 Subseries 1/1 National Aboriginal Congress, copies of minutes of meetings and related papers, 1974-1975 ................................................ p.8 Subseries 1/2 National Aboriginal Conference, Minutes of meetings and related papers, 1979-1985 ......................................................... p.9 Subseries 1/3 National Aboriginal Conference, Resolutions and indexes to resolutions, 1978-1983 .............................................................. p.15 Subseries 1/4 Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Portfolio meeting papers, 1983-1984 .................................................................................. p.16 Series 2 NAC, National Office, Correspondence and telexes, 1979-1985.... p.20 Subseries 2/1 Correspondence registers, 1983-1985 ………………………… p.20 Subseries -
Australian Historians Networking, 1914–1973 Geoffrey Bolton1
10 Australian Historians Networking, 1914–1973 Geoffrey Bolton1 TheOxford English Dictionary defines networking as ‘the action or process of making use of a network of people for the exchange of information, etc., or for professional or other advantage’.2 Although recently prominent in management theory, the art of networking has been practised over many centuries in many societies, but its role in the Australian academic community has been little explored. This essay represents a preliminary excursion into the field, raising questions that more systematic researchers may follow in time, and drawing unashamedly on the resources of the Australian Dictionary of Biography. Beginning on the eve of the First World War, the essay is bounded by the formation of the Australian Historical Association in 1973, at which date the profession provided itself with 1 This essay is a lightly edited version of the paper prepared by Geoffrey Bolton for the ‘Workshop on Biographies and Autobiographies of Historians’ held at The Australian National University in July 2015. Professor Bolton had intended to make further revisions, which included adding some analysis of the social origins of the Australian historians who participated in the networks he had defined. In all essential respects, however, we believe that the essay as presented here would have met with his approval, and we are very grateful to Carol Bolton for giving permission to make the modest editorial changes that we have incorporated. For biographical information and insights, see Stuart Macintyre, Lenore Layman and Jenny Gregory, eds, A Historian for all Seasons: Essays for Geoffrey Bolton (Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 2017). -
Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia
BenvenutiMyth and Misrepresentation and Jones in Australian Foreign Policy Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia ✣ Andrea Benvenuti and David Martin Jones In 1960 the deputy leader of the Australian Labor Party, Gough Whitlam, declared that Australia “has for ten years missed the opportunity to interpret the new nations to the old world and the old world to the new na- tions.”1 Throughout the 1960s, Labor spokesmen attacked the foreign policy of Sir Robert Menzies’s Liberal–Country Party coalition government (1949– 1966) for both its dependence on powerful friends and its alleged insensitivity to Asian countries.2 This criticism of Liberal foreign policy not only persisted in later decades but also became the prevailing academic and media ortho- doxy.3 As we show here, Labor’s criticism constitutes the basis of a tenacious political myth that demands critical reevaluation. Menzies’s political opponents and, subsequently, his academic critics have claimed that his attitude toward Asia was permeated by suspicion and conde- scension. From the 1970s, an inchoate Labor left and academic understand- ing contended that conservative Anglo-centrism “had placed Australia on the losing side of almost every external engagement from the Suez Crisis to Viet- nam.”4 A decade later, analysts writing in the context of the Labor-driven doc- trine of “enmeshment” with Asia reinforced this emerging foreign policy or- 1. Gordon Greenwood and Norman Harper, eds., Australia in World Affairs 1956–1960 (Melbourne: Cheshire, 1963), p. 96. 2. See, for instance, Mads Clausen, “‘Falsiªed by History’: Menzies, Asia and Post-Imperial Australia,” History Compass, Vol. -
KRAMER, Leonie
36 THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2015–16 DAME LEONIE KRAMER ac dbe 1924–2016 fellow · elected 1974 In 1968 she was offered the Sydney Chair in Australian Literature, succeeding the first appointee, G. A. Wilkes, and remained there until her retirement in 1989. Established in 1963 in response to a public fundraising campaign, the Sydney chair was the first and for many years the only chair in the world dedicated to the study of Australian literature. Dame Leonie’s contribution to the teaching of Australian literature at Sydney was arguably the major achievement of her career. In the 1960s, Australian literature was still a relatively new academic subject and it had a limited role in the undergraduate curriculum, with the English major dominated by the British canon. Her appointment was soon followed, in the early 1970s, by the establishment of a course dedicated to Australian literature. It proved extremely popular with students and was developed into a major with greatly expanded curriculum. Then and since, these innovations have met with fierce opposition but can be seen in retrospect as the necessary and enabling conditions for the subject’s development. The late 1970s to the early 1990s saw a continuous photo: courtesy of university of sydney expansion of the Australian literature courses. At its peak in the early 1990s, fuelled by strong numbers of overseas ame Leonie Kramer was appointed to the staff of students, the curriculum comprised over 300 titles, many Dthe University of Sydney in 1968 as Professor of by living writers. This had an incalculably positive effect Australian Literature; she retired as its Chancellor in on the publication and informed reception of Australian 2001. -
Dame Leonie Kramer AC DBE
Emeritus Professor Dame Leonie Kramer AC DBE The degree of Doctor of Letters (honoris causa) was conferred upon Emeritus Professor Dame Leonie Kramer AC DBE at the Faculty of Arts graduation ceremony held at 2.00pm on 8 March 2009. The Chancellor Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC CVO (left) conferring the honorary degree upon Emeritus Professor Dame Leonie Kramer AC DBE (right), photo, copyright Memento Photography. Citation Chancellor, I present Dame Leonie Kramer, Companion of the Order of Australia, Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire for admission to the degree of Doctor of Letters (honoris causa). Dame Leonie Kramer was the Chancellor of this University between 1991 and 2001. Before that, for some years, she served as Deputy Chancellor. It was a time of great change. She devoted herself with supreme dedication to the University and to its place of excellence amongst the universities of the world. She brought her established reputation as a teacher, thinker and writer about Australian literature as well as her role as a public intellectual and greatly accomplished woman to the manifold duties of Chancellor. She was the first woman in nearly a hundred and fifty years to be elected Chancellor of the University. This was but one of many glass ceilings that she challenged and overcame during her glittering career. It is in part because of Dame Leonie's place as an outstanding role model and fearless champion for her views that the University honours her today. We acknowledge her enormous devotion to the University and the dedication evident in the countless graduations, Senate meetings, committees and functions that she attended as the principal public face of the University. -
Australian Federation As Unfinished Business” Melbourne Journal of Politics 27: 47-67
The Constitution We Were Meant To Have Re-examining the origins and strength of Australia’s unitary political traditions Dr A J Brown Griffith University Senate Occasional Lecture Friday, 22 April 2005, 12.15pm–1.15pm Main Committee Room Parliament House, Canberra In 2005, New South Wales and Victoria celebrate the 150th anniversary of Australia’s first state constitutions. But despite their long history, how secure are the states in the culture and practice of Australian federalism? In another 150 years, will state governments exist as we know them today? In this paper Dr A J Brown reviews how Australia’s constitutional evolution has been strongly influenced by active and concrete ideas about a unitary constitutional system, beginning with under-recognised plans of the British Government dating from the late 1830s and repeated through a variety of home-grown proposals in most decades since. These traditions have a persistence which contemporary political science is often at a loss to explain, but which are here suggested to reflect a widely shared sense of a constitutional structure that Australia was ‘meant to have’, according to many citizens’ foundational political values, notwithstanding the specific twists and turns of postcolonial history. Alongside competing interpretations of federal values which have also been poorly understand, this vein of unitary political theory helps identify the extent to which Australian constitutional practice has become a mix of the worst of two traditions, rather than a balance or merging of their best elements as we might otherwise like to believe. Both the influence of unitary values, and their poorly reconciled relationship with federal principles continue to be strongly visible in contemporary politics, prompting the question whether or when we will again reinvest in an effective public discourse around the structural or territorial legitimacy of Australian federalism and intergovernmental relations. -
1He Australian National University Research School of Social Sciences
- 1HE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES HISTORY OF IDEAS UNIT ANNUAL REPORT 1985 Professor and E. Kamenka, BA Syd., Head of Unit PhD ANU, FASSA, FAHA Professorial Fellow R.R. Brown, BA New Mexico, PhD Lond., FASSA, FAHA Senior Fellow S.L. Goldberg, BA Melb., Blitt Oxon, FAHA Senior Research Fellow A. Walicki, Dr. Warsaw, Dr. habil. Polish Academy of Sciences Senior Research Fellow K. Haakonssen, Mag.Art. Copenhagen, (Research Fellow till 1 July) PhD Edinburgh Visiting Fellows Emeritus Professor J.A. Passmore (Australian National University) Mr. G. Bradshaw (St. Andrews) Professor Cai Sheng-ning (Institute of Marxism, Leninism and Mao-Zedong Thought, Peking) Dr. Mark Francis (University of Canterbury) Emeritus Professor R.E. Lane (Yale University) Dr. Michael Tanner (Cambridge) Mr. Yu Xing-zhong (Northwest School of Politics and Law, Xian) Research Assistants Mrs. E.Y. Short, MA Edinburgh Miss A. Lane BA Qld.,MA Adel., (part-time) Secretary Mrs. V. Wetselaar Secretarial Staff Mrs. W. Woods (temporary) History of ideas Unit - 2 The History of Ideas Unit, throughout its life, 'has been a very active and "visible" part of the University', with recent changes in the balance of its work and new initiatives indicating a continuing vitality, the Committee appointed to review the Unit reported to the Research School of Social Sciences and the Board of the Institute of Advanced Studies in September 1985. The Committee, consisting of Professor Max Neutze (Chairman),Professor Paul Bourke, Dr L.J. Hume, Professor Dame Leonie Kramer and Dr T.H. Rigby, said that full-time members of the Unit 'have produced a large volume of books and articles and .. -
The Liberal Face of Liberalism
FEATURES 12 The Liberal Face o f LIBERALISM Dissatisfaction with 'economic rationalism' is not confined to the Left of the spectrum. Shaun Carney interviewed Jim Ritchie, the leading figure of a new Liberal breakaway group. im Ritchie is the spokesperson for Is it fair to characterise the Liberal Reform Movement as a revolt against economic rationalism? the Liberal Reform Movement, a group formed largely from disaf I think it's a response to the collapse of a number of fected members of the Victoria philosophical strains, rather than a revolt. In response to Liberal Party, many of whom were previously the Liberal Reform Movement I have had telephone calls supporters of state Liberal MP Ian Macphee. Its from former communists and arch conservatives, both complaining about the inadequacy of their former initial stated purpose is to campaign against philosophical positions, So it's not just about economic economic rationalism, the 'level playing field', rationalism, it's much broader than that. Perhaps i could and the Goods and Services Tax. Ritchie, 44, now put that into context. Let's take three strands of political a businessman, is a former ASIO officer and philosophy: Rousseau; John Locke; and socialism. Over the last decade, each of those three has been fundamentally Branch President of the Liberal Party, ALB : DECEMBER 1991 affected by changes in our society. The Rousseauian belief that a state of nature is an ideal, that nine-tenths of the worth of a particular thing is generated by nature and one-tenth by the ingenuity of man, has found its logical home in the environmental movement. -