DOCSLIB.ORG

Diving in Football, a Social Performance Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diving in Football, a Social Performance Table of Contents CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY Prifysgol Fetropolitan Caerdydd CARDIFF SCHOOL OF SPORT DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) SPORT STUDIES 2015-6 Diving in football, a social performance. Socio-Cultural George Richard Hunt Cardiff Metropolitan University Prifysgol Fetropolitan Caerdydd Certificate of student By submitting this document, I certify that the whole of this work is the result of my individual effort, that all quotations from books and journals have been acknowledged, and that the word count given below is a true and accurate record of the words contained (omitting contents pages, acknowledgements, indices, tables, figures, plates, reference list and appendices). I further certify that the work was either deemed to not need ethical approval or was entirely within the ethical approval granted under the code entered below. Ethical approval code: Exempt_____________________ (enter code or 'exempt') Word count: 11857 Name: George Hunt Date: 10/3/16 Certificate of Dissertation Supervisor responsible I am satisfied that this work is the result of the student’s own effort and was either deemed to not need ethical approval (as indicated by 'exempt' above) or was entirely within the ethical approval granted under the code entered above. I have received dissertation verification information from this student. Name: Date: Notes: The University owns the right to reprint all or part of this document. Diving in football, a social performance Table of Contents Acknowledgements Abstract CHAPTER 1. 1.0 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Symbolic Interactionism 2.2 Performance 2.3 Impression Management 2.4 Interaction order CHAPTER 3. 3.0 METHODS 3.1 Research Paradigm 3.2 Sampling strategy 3.3 Data Collection 3.4 Ethics 3.5 Data Analysis 3.6 Judgement Criteria CHAPTER 4. 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Game Theory 4.2 Civil Inattention 4.3 Glance Theory & Face-to-Face behaviours 4.4 Impression Management 4.5 Performance 4.6 Stigma 4.7 Face-to-Face behaviour 4.8 Referees 4.9 Culture 4.10 Hegemonic Masculinity 4.11 Metro sexuality CHAPTER 5. 5.0 CONCLUSION REFERENCES APPENDICES Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my appreciation to my tutor Doc David Brown for the support of my Dissertation study, for his knowledge, patience and motivation. His guidance assisted me throughout the process. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my dissertation study. I thank my friends for the ongoing motivation, support and friendship. Finally, I would like to thank my family: My parents and my brother for supporting me throughout the process. Abstract The focal point of this study is to investigate diving in football and draw upon Goffman’s (1959, 1982) symbolic interactionism. Moreover, the study illuminates how football players dive and explore what are the motivations. It is clear that the literature in this topic area is incomplete however, using Goffman’s theories and the existing literature regarding diving, the study is able to piece together the puzzle of diving. The study is motivated by three research questions: (1) How to football players complete an ‘authentic’ dive? (2) What are the motivations to dive? (3) What are the consequences of a dive? In this dissertation, I propose a model of Goffman’s theories including Game theory, Civil inattention, Glance theory, Face-to-Face behaviours, impression management and performance to expose the process of a dive. In addition, stigma and referees will be carefully examined to gain an insight to the repercussions of diving. Finally, masculinity will be explored to identify the relationship with diving. An interpretive method approach was used to obtain the information needed.The results revealed that diving is a complex series of process and there is substantial evidence to report that the diving process is not fully individual; it incorporates referees, who play a vital role in the social interaction. This study advances our understanding of the diving process and offers a unique insight in how it is conducted. 1.0 Introduction Reily and Williams (2003) state “Football is the world’s most popular form of sport, being played in every nation without exception”. Football, too many is more than simply a game as Kuper (2010) suggests “Soccer is much more than just the most popular game in the world. It is a matter of life and death”. Football is vastly important to our daily lives by and is entertaining however, like all sports, football has elements of cheating/gamesmanship and one of these is diving. The paper explores diving an aims to understand why players dive and how they conduct a dive. The study consults scholars, pundits and current football players to understand the enigma that is diving. Diving in football is worthy of philosophical scrutiny and to investigate further as it can influence the outcome of matches, reproduce negative connotations and resit moral obligations. It is best summarised by FIFA vice president Jim Boyce, who states "It's becoming a cancer within the game”. This language used by many to describe the antics on the pitch, highlight the need to investigate this topic. Trevor Sinclair and Watson respectively states "A player has a right to go down; football is not this Walt Disney world a lot of people think it is." And "It's not Diego Maradona handballing the ball into the net. It's still the referee's decision at the end of the day; he doesn't have to give a penalty." This paper aims to differentiate the cartoon fiction of diving, and illustrate factual findings. The study reviews symbolic interactionism to gain an understanding of diving. Symbolic interaction was chosen to highlight the interaction between individuals as social actors to explain diving. Fine (1993) states Symbolic interactionism, encourages us to think theoretically to situations and to analyse why individuals act in certain ways. The study will use a documentary analysis to gather the necessary literature and material in order to answer the research question. To conclude the study, the analysis and conclusion will weigh up the information collected and provide an explanation and clearly present how players dive, and get away with it. Whitehead (1998, 58; 2002, 93) sums up why masculinity should be included when discussing tensions within sexuality by suggesting there is confusion over who actually is a hegemonically masculine man—“Is it John Wayne or Leonardo DiCaprio; Mike Tyson or Pele? Or maybe, at different times, all of them?” This shows, and reflects, that both diving and masculinity has elements of ambiguity which is central to the study. To commence this paper, the literature review will be consulted. 2.0 Literature review Consulting the existing literature, it is clear that symbolic interactionism and masculinity are topics that are frequently used to study sport in society. However, it is evident that the literature regarding social performance of diving is incomplete. As a result, this project will consult media data and historical records in which will be analysed through a conceptual lense. Diving in football deserves sociological scrutiny as it is an under studied phenomenon, which has caused outrage, annoyance by many from the sporting community and also challenges morality. Firstly, this literature review discusses Symbolic interactionalism and its core ideas of ‘performance’ and the ‘interaction order’. Secondly, the literature surrounding masculinity and its applications to and in sport will be examined. 2.1 Symbolic Interactionism Dewey (1981) states humans are best understood in comparison to their environment. Mead (1934) links “the conservation of gestures” and “the use of significant symbols” to symbolic interactionism. He suggests people respond to gestures and interaction through what it means to them. Symbolic interactionism according to Blumer (1962:180) “refers, of course, to the peculiar and distinctive character of interaction as it takes place between human beings”. He adds that human beings “define” each other’s actions as opposed to reacting to their action. Symbolic interaction identifies that individuals are ‘social actors’ and act in a specific manner or behaviour, which has been influenced by their background, environment and their moral compass. Therefore, Symbolic interactionism is a tool to understand social performance and individual behaviour. This study will primarily use Goffman’s theory of symbolic interactionism and his theory of social performance to address the research question. Goffman (1983) is interested in the “interaction order” and “social order”. Larossa and Reitzes (1993) point out that “symbolic interactionalism focuses on the connection between shared meanings and interactions” (p.135). Furthermore, Denzin (cited in Flick et.al 2004, p.82) states symbolic interactionism is the, Analysis of the development course of action that occurs when two or more persons (or agents) with agency (reflectivity) join their individual lines of action together into joint action It portrays that interaction with others become intertwined and individuals respond to interaction of each other. When a dive occurs, the players involved are acting under the constraints of the game, therefore adjust their social interaction accordingly. Blumer (1969) points out “Human beings in interacting with one another have to take account of what each other is doing or is about to do; they are forced to direct their own conduct or handle their situations in terms of what they take into account (p.6). Before, during and after a dive, the interaction between the individuals depends on the motives and reactions of themselves. The individuals adjust their reaction in what they believe the individual intended to achieve. Blumer (1969) states “The actions of others enter to set what one plans to do, may oppose or prevent such plans, may require revision of such plans” (p.6). The interaction between players on the field influence decision making and thought process which could change social interactions verbally, physically and cognitively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gamesmanship Beliefs of High School Coaches
    Gamesmanship Beliefs of High School Coaches by Brad Strand, North Dakota State University a coach yells at or challenges game officials, his or her actions are critiqued by athletes, parents, spectators, fans, and the media who Abstract are in attendance or participating in the competition. Depending on This study evaluated gamesmanship beliefs of high school the perception of an individual, a coach can be viewed as passionate coaches from a rural Midwestern state in the United States. Two or pathetic, demanding or demeaning. Coaches tend to talk about hundred and fifty-six coaches participated in this study with sportsmanship and fair play, but often, while in the heat of a game, comparisons drawn by gender, highest level of participation, formal they take the “win at all cost” approach, and pull out all the stops coaching training, years of experience, and officiating experience. to earn a victory (Garbin, 2010). This “win at all cost” approach is Participants completed a 25-statement survey. The survey consisted found in youth league sports as well as high school sports (Garber, of 25 gamesmanship statements that asked subjects to indicate if an 2006; Garner, 2013). action was clearly acceptable (1), acceptable (2), unacceptable (3), Sport scholars have long studied sportsmanship, ethical beliefs, or clearly unacceptable (4). Chronbach's Alpha measure (a=.938) and moral reasoning of athletes and coaches (Beller & Stoll, indicated a high consistency and reliability for the statements on 1995; Doty, 2006; Hahm, 1989; Kavussanu & Roberts, 2001; the survey instrument. A crosstabs analysis provided Pearson Chi- Rees, Howell & Miracle, 1990; Rudd & Stoll, 2004; Weiss & Square or Fischer Exact tests to identify statistical significance Bredemeirer, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11: Ethics and Violence in Sport Practice Questions
    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CHAPTER 11: Ethics and violence in sport Practice questions - text book pages 155 - 156 1) We often talk about sports performers playing fairly. Which of the following options best describes gamesmanship? a. playing within the written rules. b. it’s not whether you won or lost that matters, it’s how you played the game. c. the intention to compete to the limit of the rules and beyond if you can get away with it. d. fair, generous and polite behaviour, especially when playing a sport or game. Answer: c. Explanation: Gamesmanship describes behaviour to the limit and outside the rules of sport. 2) Which one of the following is not an example of sportsmanship-like behaviour? a. respect for an opponent. b. win-at-all-costs attitude. c. punish foul behaviour. d. use drug testing procedures to eliminate cheats. Answer: b. 3) The win ethic is evident in modern day elite sports. Which one of the following is an example of this ethic? a. outcomes over-ride the process of participating. b. allow everyone to compete on a level playing field. c. play within the spirit of the game. d. lend a player to the opposition team who have arrived with one player short. Answer: a. Explanation: The win ethic is based on the statement ‘winning isn’t the most important thing – it’s the only thing. 4) An example of positive deviance is: a. using bribes to influence the outcome of a match. b. continue playing through an injury. c. using performance enhancing drugs. d.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Play, Cheating and Gamesmanship in Young Basketball Teams
    Journal of Physical Education & Health, 2016, vol. 5 (8), 29-33 FAIR PLAY, CHEATING AND GAMESMANSHIP IN YOUNG BASKETBALL TEAMS F.J. Ponseti; J. Cantallops; A. Muntaner-Mas University of Balearic Islands Abstract The aim of this study was to analyse young basketball players’ attitudes towards fair play, winning, enjoyment, hard play and the acceptability of antisocial behaviour in the context of sports teams, such as cheating and gamesmanship. The sample included 230 adolescents (139 boys and 91 girls) with a mean age of 12.5 years (Range: 10-15 years; SD = 2.09 years). Results showed the importance of fun in sports, and the greater acceptance of gamesmanship and cheating among female players. Key words: Fair play, cheating, gamesmanship, team sports, young players. disadvantage through the use of gamesmanship, Introduction including faking injury, wasting time, or trying to Sport is considered an appropriate instrument for unnerve the opponent [12]. All these behaviours the transference of the practical values of result in negative consequences for the personal and social development, such as: opponent and reflect an absence or diminution of improvement, integration, respect for people and fair play [1, 6]. their different capacities, tolerance, cooperation While there are numerous studies aimed at and fair play. The concept of fair play in sports analysing behaviours associated with fair play teams can be observed through behaviours such and sportsmanship [1, 13, 4], there are few as throwing the ball away when an opponent is studies dedicated to examining the acceptance injured, not exploiting a disadvantaged opponent, of antisocial behaviours by team players and, recognizing one's own failure to comply with the specifically, acceptance of cheating and rules, and truthfully indicating whether the ball gamesmanship [9, 5].
    [Show full text]
  • “He's Taken a Dive”: Cultural Comparisons of Elite Referee
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) “He’s taken a Dive”: Cultural Comparisons of Elite Referee Responses to Reduced Player Behaviour in Association Football Tom Webb & Richard Thelwell Sport Business and Management: An International Journal Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to consider the cultural similarities and differences between elite referees concerning their preparation and performance in dealing with reduced player behaviour. Design: Semi-structured interviews were employed to collect the data. The 37 participants from England, Spain and Italy were selected through the use of purposive sampling, and all were working in the field of refereeing as current elite level referees, ex-elite level referees, referee assessors, referee coaches, or managers and administrators from bodies that manage and train referees. Inductive content analysis was employed to generate themes from the raw data. Findings: Referees have identified particular issues related specifically to player behaviour and also identified specific traits pertaining to players from certain countries. Furthermore, results demonstrate that referees have begun to alter their preparation and performance due to the pressure they perceive exists within Association Football and, more specifically, from the players themselves. Originality: This study is the first to compare cross-cultural elite referee responses regarding their preparation and performance related to player behaviour. Key words: Association Football, elite referees, cultural comparison, player behaviour, simulation. Paper type: Research paper. 1 Introduction There is a body of work that has examined the existence of several factors concerning player behaviour in team sports, such as aggression in ice hockey and field hockey (Shapcott, Bloom, and Loughead 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Deception in Sport: a Conceptual and Ethical Analysis
    Deception in Sport: A Conceptual and Ethical Analysis Adam Pfleegor Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Master of Arts in Applied Health Sciences (Health & Physical Education) Supervisor: Dr. Danny Rosenberg Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario Adam Pfleegor © December, 2010 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................5 Chapter I: Introduction .................................................................................................................6 Introduction and Overview ..........................................................................................................6 Theoretical Foundations.............................................................................................................19 Main Questions ..........................................................................................................................25 Rationale and Need for the Study ..............................................................................................26 Limitations and Delimitations ....................................................................................................27 Chapter Development ................................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of Professional Football
    The work of professional football Most professional footballers don’t have a Ferrari, a mansion, a celebrity girl- friend or a lucrative book deal. Few of them will ever play at Wembley. Their careers are short, insecure, and played out under constant scrutiny. The Work of Professional Football offers a sociological study of the working lives of ‘ordinary’ professional footballers. Based on extensive research, including in- depth interviews with players who have achieved varying degrees of professional success, it provides unprecedented insight into this ‘closed’ world, and a unique sociological exploration of a contemporary working culture. It examines: ● The labour of professional sport ● The drama and performance of a career in the public eye ● How players deal with the fragile and uncertain nature of their careers ● The role of footballers’ working and family relationships ● Changing attitudes and ideals over the course of a career The book focuses on career turning points, such as injury and transfer, and demonstrates how players’ identities are built around basic needs for security and self-esteem. The Work of Professional Football will be of great interest to students and researchers working in the sociology of sport and the sociology of work, foot- ball studies, coaching studies, business and management. Martin Roderick is Lecturer in Sociology at Durham University, UK and a former professional footballer. The work of professional football A labour of love? Martin Roderick I~ ~~o~!!;n~~~up LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2006 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2006 Martin Roderick Typeset in Goudy by GreenGate Publishing Services,Tonbridge The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Sportsmanship, Gamesmanship, and Cheating
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Robert Daly/OJO© Jones images/Getty Images. & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER 2 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORSportsmanship, SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning,Gamesmanship, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION and Cheating © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION age by using text messaging to get answers or ▸ How People Win “Googling” during exams. Everyone likes to win! Adults and children Cheating in one’s private life ultimately leads to negative outcomes for the cheater © Jones &alike Bartlett enjoy the Learning, exuberance ofLLC winning, but it © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC is also clear that some people like to win more while affecting other people and business inter- NOT FORthan SALE others. OR The DISTRIBUTION subject of this chapter is how ests. CheatingNOT in FOR one’s SALEpersonal ORlife can DISTRIBUTION trans- people win. Should we concern ourselves with late to lost income—this can certainly occur how people get into the winner’s circle, or by if you are a world-class athlete. Professional what means they use to prevail? After all, no Golf Association (PGA) golfer Tiger Woods’ one remembers who finished second in the marital infidelities were splashed across world © Jones & Bartlett Learning,Super Bowl. LLC © Jonesheadlines & Bartlett when Learning,his conduct LLCwas exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Moral Decision-Making Attitudes of Elite
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(3): 378-385, 2018 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060303 Examination of Moral Decision-making Attitudes of Elite Male Basketball Players and Wrestlers According to Variables of Sport Experience i and Mother, Father Education Fethi Arslan1,*, Mehmet Akif Ziyagil1,2, Canan Bastık3 1School of Physical Education and Sports, Mersin University, Turkey 2Giresun University, Turkey 3Department of Physical Education and Bursa, Bursa Technical University, Turkey Copyright©2018 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The purpose of this research was to examine abilities of individuals, that can be performed by means or the extent to which at sport moral decision making no means in the framework of certain rules for leisure time attitudes were applied by the athletes, and the factors that or competition with its social, spiritual, physical as well as caused it. The research was based on the causal mental effects on human beings Erkal, Güven &Ayan [10]. comparative research model. The research group consisted Although there was agreement related to sports of a total of 475 athletes, of which 195 were basketball participation in that it builds moral character and fosters athletes randomly selected from seven geographical moral functioning Shields & Bredemeier [31], several regions and 280 were wrestling athletes. Lee, Whitehead, anti-social behaviors including doping, foul play, injuring & Ntoumanis [23] used data collection tools to measure an opponent, aggression, cheating and gamesmanship are the moral decision-making attitudes of athletes (Attitude observed in most of sport situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamesmanship and Criminal Process
    Washington and Lee University School of Law Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons Scholarly Articles Faculty Scholarship 2020 Gamesmanship and Criminal Process John D. King Washington and Lee University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation John D. King, Gamesmanship and Criminal Process, 58 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 47 (2020). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES GAMESMANSHIP AND CRIMINAL PROCESS John D. King* ABSTRACT We ®rst learn formal structures of rules, procedures, and norms of conduct through games and sports. These lessons illuminate and inform human behav- ior in other contexts, including the adversarial world of criminal litigation. As critiques of the legitimacy and fairness of the criminal justice system increase, the philosophy and jurisprudence of sport offer a comparative legal system to examine criminal litigation. Allegations of gamesmanshipÐthe aggressive and strategic use of rules that violate some sense of decorum or culture yet remain within the formal rules of engagementÐcut across both contexts. This Article examines what sports can teach us about gamesmanship in criminal litigation. After distinguishing gamesmanship from cheating, this Article compares several examples of gamesmanship in sport and criminal litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Interests of Baseball Clause and the Astros' "High Tech" Sign-Stealing Scandal
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 31 Issue 2 Article 3 2021 The Commissioner Goes Too Far: The Best Interests of Baseball Clause And The Astros' "High Tech" Sign-Stealing Scandal Walter T. Champion Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Walter T. Champion, The Commissioner Goes Too Far: The Best Interests of Baseball Clause And The Astros' "High Tech" Sign-Stealing Scandal, 31 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 215 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol31/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHAMPION – ARTICLE 31.2 5/18/2021 10:33 PM ARTICLES THE COMMISSIONER GOES TOO FAR: THE BEST INTERESTS OF BASEBALL CLAUSE AND THE ASTROS’ “HIGH TECH” SIGN- STEALING SCANDAL WALTER T. CHAMPION INTRODUCTION The Commissioner of Baseball, Rob Manfred, penalized the Houston Astros for sign-stealing in 2017, allegedly using “high tech” methods in opposition to the rules of Major League Baseball.1 In a scathing nine-page report the Commissioner made sure to indicate that there was absolutely no evidence that Jim Crane, the Astros’ owner, was aware of any misconduct.2 The Commissioner accused Astros employees in the video replay review room of using live game feed from the center field camera to attempt to decode and transmit opposing teams’ sign sequences. These employees would communicate the sign sequence information by text message which was received on the Apple watch of a staff member on the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheating, Gamesmanship, and the Concept of a Practice”
    “Cheating, Gamesmanship, and the Concept of a Practice” Brian P. Palmiter Harvard University In 1980, the Virginia Senate had to decide whether to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment. In order for ratification to succeed, an absolute majority of the Senate (21 of 40) was required to support the amendment. Leading up to the vote, support for ratification was evenly split, with twenty senators in favor and twenty opposed. If a tie occurred on the official vote, Senate rules provided that the Senate’s presiding officer, Lieutenant Governor Charles Robb, would be granted a vote to break the tie. On this issue, Robb was projected to support ratification. Thus, the anticipated result was that the amendment would be ratified, 21-20. In practice, however, ratification of the E.R.A. failed despite no one changing his or her mind on the merits of ratification. Paradoxically, the amendment was defeated because Senator John Chichester, an E.R.A. opponent, decided not to vote against the bill, choosing instead to abstain. By abstaining, his vote counted neither for nor against the amendment, making the final vote 20-19, with one abstention. Since Chichester’s abstention meant there was no tie, and thus no need for the lieutenant governor to cast a tiebreaking vote, the amendment failed to meet the twenty-one vote threshold required for ratification. After the amendment’s defeat, Lieutenant Governor Robb observed that Chichester’s decision was one the senator would “have to wrestle over with his own conscience,” implying Chichester’s voting trick was ethically dubious despite being consistent with the existing rules.1 This incident, recounted in William Riker’s classic The Art of Political Manipulation, is a paradigmatic example of gamesmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamesmanship1
    Gamesmanship 213 JOURNAL OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SPORT, 2004, XXXI, 212-225 © 2004 by the International Association for the Philosophy of Sport Gamesmanship1 Leslie A. Howe “What are you prepared to do to win?” This is a question that any serious competitor will at one time or another have to consider. The answer that one is inclined to make, I shall argue, is revealing of the deeper character of the individual participant in sport as both physical competitor and moral person. To that end, I examine one of the classic responses to the question, gamesmanship, which can be characterized as an attempt to win one game by playing another. I contend that gamesmanship is a deliberate strategy of competition that has certain paradoxical outcomes; although it might produce an enhanced competitive environment that calls forth superior performances from participants, its more aggravated manifes- tations are, in the long term, athletically self-destructive for those who rely on it as a competitive device. I argue the presence of more profound underlying moral failings, as well. I shall begin by considering what gamesmanship is and what it is not. At this point, the explication of the practice is neutral with respect to its moral value, rather than its efficacy in achieving sport-specific aims. Because gamesmanship is a strategy designed for winning regardless of athletic excellence, I examine the relationship between winning and excellence and how each contributes to the defi- nition of sport. I shall argue that sport is less about results than about the process leading to results and thus that sport is ultimately not about statistics alone but about the athlete who produces those statistics.2 I defend the view that sport is about the athlete as a person who willingly undergoes various kinds of trial—physical, psychological, and ultimately moral—because he or she is always confronted with the possibility of failure and the choice of how to respond to that possibility.
    [Show full text]