DOCSLIB.ORG

Gamesmanship and Criminal Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gamesmanship and Criminal Process Washington and Lee University School of Law Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons Scholarly Articles Faculty Scholarship 2020 Gamesmanship and Criminal Process John D. King Washington and Lee University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation John D. King, Gamesmanship and Criminal Process, 58 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 47 (2020). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES GAMESMANSHIP AND CRIMINAL PROCESS John D. King* ABSTRACT We ®rst learn formal structures of rules, procedures, and norms of conduct through games and sports. These lessons illuminate and inform human behav- ior in other contexts, including the adversarial world of criminal litigation. As critiques of the legitimacy and fairness of the criminal justice system increase, the philosophy and jurisprudence of sport offer a comparative legal system to examine criminal litigation. Allegations of gamesmanshipÐthe aggressive and strategic use of rules that violate some sense of decorum or culture yet remain within the formal rules of engagementÐcut across both contexts. This Article examines what sports can teach us about gamesmanship in criminal litigation. After distinguishing gamesmanship from cheating, this Article compares several examples of gamesmanship in sport and criminal litigation. These examples address the Crawford right of confrontation, the Brady obligation to disclose favorable evi- dence to the defendant, and the Batson prohibition against using race in jury selec- tion. This Article uses the jurisprudence of sport to propose a framework within which to view these claims in the criminal justice context. Recognizing the asym- metrical nature of the adversarial criminal justice system and the dual role of pros- ecutors as advocates and ministers of justice, this Article argues that prosecutorial gamesmanship poses a different and more acute danger to the legitimacy of the criminal adjudication system than does such behavior by defense lawyers. This Article concludes that gamesmanship is not only an inevitable part of any rule-based adversarial contest but also a positive and productive phenomenon that forces those invested in a system to de®ne which values and objectives are fundamental to that system. Only when an instance of gamesmanship is inconsis- tent with these broader values or objectives should it be regulated or eliminated. * James P. More®eld Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law. LL.M., Georgetown University Law Center, 2005; J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 1996; B.A., Brown University, 1992. I would like to thank Mitchell Berman, Stephanos Bibas, Johanna Bond, Youngjae Lee, Alice Ristroph, Jonathan Shapiro, Kate Weisburd, and Ty Alper for their helpful comments and suggestions, as well as Kimberly Blasey for her outstanding research assistance, and the Frances Lewis Law Center for its ®nancial support. © 2021, John D. King. 47 48 AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 58:47 INTRODUCTION ............................................ 48 I. WHY LOOK AT SPORTS RULES? ............................ 51 A. Comparing ªLegalº Regimes ......................... 52 B. The Long History of Comparing Law to Sport ... 53 C. Limitations of the Analogy Between Law and Sport ... 57 II. CHARGES OF GAMESMANSHIP IN CRIMINAL LITIGATION AND IN SPORT ... 60 A. Charges of Gamesmanship in Sport .................... 60 1. Violating a Core Rule of the Game . 60 2. Losing on Purpose ............................. 63 3. ªOver-Enforcingº an Obscure Rule Against an Opponent . 65 B. Allegations of Gamesmanship in Criminal Litigation . 67 1. Confrontation and Discovery Rights . 68 2. Disclosure of Favorable Evidence . 72 3. Jury Selection ................................. 74 III. GAMESMANSHIP, CHEATING, AND HOW TO RESPOND . 77 A. Gamesmanship De®ned ............................. 78 B. Gamesmanship Distinguished from Cheating . 79 C. Regulatory Responses to Gamesmanship in Sport . 87 IV. WHAT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CAN LEARN FROM SPORTS . 90 CONCLUSION .............................................. 95 INTRODUCTION We ®rst learn formal structures of rules and norms of conduct through games and sports. Notions of fair play, sportsmanship, and cheating are developed from an early age on basketball courts, playgrounds, and soccer ®elds. Today, as many critique the legitimacy of the American criminal justice system in sev- eral different respects, those who care about the integrity of the criminal jus- tice system can learn from ideas and philosophies of fairness and cheating in the sports context. Speci®cally, the idea of ªgamesmanshipº in criminal proce- dure has fruitful analogies in the world of sport. In the adversarial world of American criminal adjudication, prosecutors and defense attorneys occasion- ally accuse each other of ªplaying gamesº instead of playing fair. But what one person would characterize as gamesmanship, another would characterize as zealously using the rules to the advantage of one's client or cause. And whereas ªcheatingº (in the sense of violating the constitutional or statutory rules that govern criminal practice) provides relatively clear lines of accept- ability, the more interesting and dif®cult questions instead involve the aggres- sive use of rules that might violate some sense of decorum or culture, but stay within the formal rules of engagement. The concept of gamesmanship is notoriously tricky to de®ne, but one useful def- inition from the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport is ªa strategy designed for 2020] GAMESMANSHIP AND CRIMINAL PROCESS 49 winning regardless of athletic excellence.º1 Translated to the criminal litigation context, this idea might imperfectly be expressed as ªa strategy designed for win- ning regardless of the factual and legal merits of the case.º Such a de®nition reso- nates with the negative connotations of the term in litigation: one side may use it to accuse the other side of engaging in tactics that have nothing to do with the true goal or ultimate systemic objective of the litigation. Others looking at the concept of gamesmanship from a philosophical angle have found a meaningful distinction between ªthe rules of the gameº and ªthe code of fair play.º2 The code of fair play, which is an unwritten set of shared expectations among the participants about the range of acceptable behavior, overlaps but is not co-extensive with the of®cial rules of the game.3 Some actions do not violate the rules but would offend notions of fair play, while other actions that violate the rules would not be seen as outside of the code of fair play.4 One such example is the intentional foul in basketball, which is against the rules of the game but is in no way seen as violating notions of fair play. Conversely, some litigators take the position that objecting during an opponent's opening statement or closing argument to a jury violates some shared expectation or norm of conduct, although doing so is certainly within the of®cial rules of engagement and in fact might be necessary to enforce those formal rules. Although usually invoked in a pejorative sense in sport and in criminal practice, gamesmanship can serve an important and productive purpose. By clarifying the boundaries of acceptable practice and by bringing into stark relief the limitations of existing rules, gamesmanship forces us to establish and defend which objectives are essential and which values are central to a system. Only where a practice of gamesmanship subverts or undermines an overarching goal is it problematic.5 The overall professed goals of the criminal justice system are familiar: the ascertain- ment of truth and application of just verdicts within a system that protects individ- ual rights and human dignity.6 If gamesmanship subverts these ends, it should be discouraged in criminal litigation. But the prescription depends entirely on how one de®nes the goals of the system within which gamesmanship is deployed. Often, what appears to be gamesmanship may be perfectly aligned with a broader goal and so should not only be tolerated but also encouraged.7 1. Leslie A. Howe, Gamesmanship, 31 J. PHIL. SPORT 212, 212 (2004). 2. DAVID PAPINEAU, KNOWING THE SCORE: WHAT SPORTS CAN TEACH US ABOUT PHILOSOPHY (AND WHAT PHILOSOPHY CAN TEACH US ABOUT SPORTS) 54 (2017). 3. See id. at 54 (de®ning the code of fair play as ªthe expectations that the athletes have of each other, their sense of what is and is not acceptable behaviourº and noting that fair play is ªoften consistent with breaking a game's rulesº). 4. See generally FREDERICK SCHAUER, PLAYING BY THE RULES: A PHILOSOPHICAL EXAMINATION OF RULE- BASED DECISION-MAKING IN LAW AND IN LIFE (1991) (discussing the difference between norms and rules). 5. See Howe, supra note 1, at 216, 218. 6. See, e.g., Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 415 (1966) (ªThe basic purpose of a trial is the determination of truth . .º). 7. Howe, supra note 1, at 221 (arguing that not using certain types of gamesmanship is ªdisrespectful of the opponentÐit implies that the other competitor is not signi®cant enough to warrant one's full attentionº). 50 AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 58:47 An important caveat in comparing sports to criminal litigation is the asymmetry in role and resources between the contestants. Although a general requirement of sport is that each participant faces the same restrictions, is bound by the same rules, and pursues the same goals,8 our tradition of criminal justice assigns different objectives to prosecutors and defense lawyers. Because of these different roles, rules of gamesmanship should apply differently to the different players in the crim- inal justice system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Astros' Sign-Stealing Scandal
    The Astros’ Sign-Stealing Scandal Major League Baseball (MLB) fosters an extremely competitive environment. Tens of millions of dollars in salary (and endorsements) can hang in the balance, depending on whether a player performs well or poorly. Likewise, hundreds of millions of dollars of value are at stake for the owners as teams vie for World Series glory. Plus, fans, players and owners just want their team to win. And everyone hates to lose! It is no surprise, then, that the history of big-time baseball is dotted with cheating scandals ranging from the Black Sox scandal of 1919 (“Say it ain’t so, Joe!”), to Gaylord Perry’s spitter, to the corked bats of Albert Belle and Sammy Sosa, to the widespread use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) in the 1990s and early 2000s. Now, the Houston Astros have joined this inglorious list. Catchers signal to pitchers which type of pitch to throw, typically by holding down a certain number of fingers on their non-gloved hand between their legs as they crouch behind the plate. It is typically not as simple as just one finger for a fastball and two for a curve, but not a lot more complicated than that. In September 2016, an Astros intern named Derek Vigoa gave a PowerPoint presentation to general manager Jeff Luhnow that featured an Excel-based application that was programmed with an algorithm. The algorithm was designed to (and could) decode the pitching signs that opposing teams’ catchers flashed to their pitchers. The Astros called it “Codebreaker.” One Astros employee referred to the sign- stealing system that evolved as the “dark arts.”1 MLB rules allowed a runner standing on second base to steal signs and relay them to the batter, but the MLB rules strictly forbade using electronic means to decipher signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Doping
    Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs | Science News for Students 3/16/20, 6:42 AM HEALTH & MEDICINE Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs As new ways of doping emerge, scientists develop ways to catch the cheaters Athletes train to get stronger, run faster and jump higher. But some may turn to an illegal short-cut: performance-enhancing drugs. Scientists are working to find these cheaters. JACOB AMMENTORP LUND/ISTOCKPHOTO By Sarah Zielinski August 15, 2016 at 6:00 am MANCHESTER, England — Keen viewers of the Rio Olympics this week may notice that one country’s team is a lot smaller than usual. Russia brought only about 70 percent of the athletes it had expected would compete. Some 30 percent — including all weightlifters and all but one track and field athletes — were banned from the competition. The reason? They were caught up in a cheating scandal. The type of cheating these athletes had participated in is known as “doping.” It involves the use of drugs to improve performance. These drugs have medical purposes for people who are ill. But in healthy athletes, they can provide an illegal advantage by boosting muscle growth or offering other benefits. And it’s not just using these substances that can get an athlete in trouble. Athletes also can get banned for refusing to participate in (or tampering with) efforts to find others who use doping drugs. The Russian scandal involved an elaborate plot to https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/even-some-olympic-athletes-cheat-drugs Page 1 of 5 Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs | Science News for Students 3/16/20, 6:42 AM interfere with these tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamesmanship Beliefs of High School Coaches
    Gamesmanship Beliefs of High School Coaches by Brad Strand, North Dakota State University a coach yells at or challenges game officials, his or her actions are critiqued by athletes, parents, spectators, fans, and the media who Abstract are in attendance or participating in the competition. Depending on This study evaluated gamesmanship beliefs of high school the perception of an individual, a coach can be viewed as passionate coaches from a rural Midwestern state in the United States. Two or pathetic, demanding or demeaning. Coaches tend to talk about hundred and fifty-six coaches participated in this study with sportsmanship and fair play, but often, while in the heat of a game, comparisons drawn by gender, highest level of participation, formal they take the “win at all cost” approach, and pull out all the stops coaching training, years of experience, and officiating experience. to earn a victory (Garbin, 2010). This “win at all cost” approach is Participants completed a 25-statement survey. The survey consisted found in youth league sports as well as high school sports (Garber, of 25 gamesmanship statements that asked subjects to indicate if an 2006; Garner, 2013). action was clearly acceptable (1), acceptable (2), unacceptable (3), Sport scholars have long studied sportsmanship, ethical beliefs, or clearly unacceptable (4). Chronbach's Alpha measure (a=.938) and moral reasoning of athletes and coaches (Beller & Stoll, indicated a high consistency and reliability for the statements on 1995; Doty, 2006; Hahm, 1989; Kavussanu & Roberts, 2001; the survey instrument. A crosstabs analysis provided Pearson Chi- Rees, Howell & Miracle, 1990; Rudd & Stoll, 2004; Weiss & Square or Fischer Exact tests to identify statistical significance Bredemeirer, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11: Ethics and Violence in Sport Practice Questions
    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CHAPTER 11: Ethics and violence in sport Practice questions - text book pages 155 - 156 1) We often talk about sports performers playing fairly. Which of the following options best describes gamesmanship? a. playing within the written rules. b. it’s not whether you won or lost that matters, it’s how you played the game. c. the intention to compete to the limit of the rules and beyond if you can get away with it. d. fair, generous and polite behaviour, especially when playing a sport or game. Answer: c. Explanation: Gamesmanship describes behaviour to the limit and outside the rules of sport. 2) Which one of the following is not an example of sportsmanship-like behaviour? a. respect for an opponent. b. win-at-all-costs attitude. c. punish foul behaviour. d. use drug testing procedures to eliminate cheats. Answer: b. 3) The win ethic is evident in modern day elite sports. Which one of the following is an example of this ethic? a. outcomes over-ride the process of participating. b. allow everyone to compete on a level playing field. c. play within the spirit of the game. d. lend a player to the opposition team who have arrived with one player short. Answer: a. Explanation: The win ethic is based on the statement ‘winning isn’t the most important thing – it’s the only thing. 4) An example of positive deviance is: a. using bribes to influence the outcome of a match. b. continue playing through an injury. c. using performance enhancing drugs. d.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Recourse for Victims of Gaming Fraud
    SMITH FORMATTED 5.22.17.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/30/17 2:23 PM CHEATER’S JUSTICE: JUDICIAL RECOURSE FOR VICTIMS OF GAMING FRAUD Jordan T. Smith* I. INTRODUCTION Legends of extrajudicial “cheater’s justice” dealt upon gaming con-artists and swindlers have deep historical roots. In the Old West, a card shark may have been shot on sight.1 Later, when the mob (allegedly) ran Las Vegas, a hustler might have been given the choice of “hav[ing] the money and the hammer or [walking] out of here,” but not both.2 Gradually, as gambling became more socially acceptable and government regulation of it increased, disputants transitioned from wielding brutish self-help remedies to pursuing legal retribution.3 Today, courts largely accept that a party cheated in a gambling game can recover any losses in a civil action without necessarily being limited to administrative remedies through a state’s gaming regulators.4 * Mr. Smith is an attorney in Nevada. The views expressed in this Article belong solely to the Author and do not reflect the views of any employer or client. 1 See People v. Grimes, 64 P. 101, 103 (Cal. 1901) (“The deceased may have treated the appellant unfairly and unjustly in the matter of the game of cards, but that treatment gave appellant no legal excuse or justification for taking his life.”); see also State v. Vansant, 80 Mo. 67, 73–74, 1883 WL 9952, *5 (1883); Johnson v. State, 10 S.W. 235, 236 (Tex. App. 1888); State v. Shadwell, 57 P. 281 (Mont. 1899).
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Play, Cheating and Gamesmanship in Young Basketball Teams
    Journal of Physical Education & Health, 2016, vol. 5 (8), 29-33 FAIR PLAY, CHEATING AND GAMESMANSHIP IN YOUNG BASKETBALL TEAMS F.J. Ponseti; J. Cantallops; A. Muntaner-Mas University of Balearic Islands Abstract The aim of this study was to analyse young basketball players’ attitudes towards fair play, winning, enjoyment, hard play and the acceptability of antisocial behaviour in the context of sports teams, such as cheating and gamesmanship. The sample included 230 adolescents (139 boys and 91 girls) with a mean age of 12.5 years (Range: 10-15 years; SD = 2.09 years). Results showed the importance of fun in sports, and the greater acceptance of gamesmanship and cheating among female players. Key words: Fair play, cheating, gamesmanship, team sports, young players. disadvantage through the use of gamesmanship, Introduction including faking injury, wasting time, or trying to Sport is considered an appropriate instrument for unnerve the opponent [12]. All these behaviours the transference of the practical values of result in negative consequences for the personal and social development, such as: opponent and reflect an absence or diminution of improvement, integration, respect for people and fair play [1, 6]. their different capacities, tolerance, cooperation While there are numerous studies aimed at and fair play. The concept of fair play in sports analysing behaviours associated with fair play teams can be observed through behaviours such and sportsmanship [1, 13, 4], there are few as throwing the ball away when an opponent is studies dedicated to examining the acceptance injured, not exploiting a disadvantaged opponent, of antisocial behaviours by team players and, recognizing one's own failure to comply with the specifically, acceptance of cheating and rules, and truthfully indicating whether the ball gamesmanship [9, 5].
    [Show full text]
  • “He's Taken a Dive”: Cultural Comparisons of Elite Referee
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) “He’s taken a Dive”: Cultural Comparisons of Elite Referee Responses to Reduced Player Behaviour in Association Football Tom Webb & Richard Thelwell Sport Business and Management: An International Journal Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to consider the cultural similarities and differences between elite referees concerning their preparation and performance in dealing with reduced player behaviour. Design: Semi-structured interviews were employed to collect the data. The 37 participants from England, Spain and Italy were selected through the use of purposive sampling, and all were working in the field of refereeing as current elite level referees, ex-elite level referees, referee assessors, referee coaches, or managers and administrators from bodies that manage and train referees. Inductive content analysis was employed to generate themes from the raw data. Findings: Referees have identified particular issues related specifically to player behaviour and also identified specific traits pertaining to players from certain countries. Furthermore, results demonstrate that referees have begun to alter their preparation and performance due to the pressure they perceive exists within Association Football and, more specifically, from the players themselves. Originality: This study is the first to compare cross-cultural elite referee responses regarding their preparation and performance related to player behaviour. Key words: Association Football, elite referees, cultural comparison, player behaviour, simulation. Paper type: Research paper. 1 Introduction There is a body of work that has examined the existence of several factors concerning player behaviour in team sports, such as aggression in ice hockey and field hockey (Shapcott, Bloom, and Loughead 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalizing Match-Fixing As America Legalizes Sports Gambling
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 31 Issue 1 Fall Article 2 2020 Criminalizing Match-Fixing as America Legalizes Sports Gambling Jodi S. Balsam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Jodi S. Balsam, Criminalizing Match-Fixing as America Legalizes Sports Gambling, 31 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 1 () Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol31/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BALSAM – ARTICLE 31.1 12/17/2020 8:47 PM ARTICLES CRIMINALIZING MATCH-FIXING AS AMERICA LEGALIZES SPORTS GAMBLING JODI S. BALSAM INTRODUCTION1 In May 2018, the Supreme Court decided Murphy v. NCAA,2 striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) that prohibited states from allowing sports betting.3 At this writing, more than two years after PASPA’s judicial repeal, eighteen states have enacted legal sports betting, five states plus Washington, D.C. have passed legislation that is pending launch, and twenty-four more have introduced sports gambling bills.4 Somewhat myopically, these legislative efforts fail to address the game integrity concerns flagged by the sports leagues and other entities that create the contests on which Associate Professor of Clinical Law, Director of Externship Programs, Brooklyn Law School. I received excellent research assistance from Nick Rybarczyk, Matthew Schechter, Madison Smiley, and Katherine Wilcox. Thank you to Daniel Wallach and to participants in the Brooklyn Law School Faculty Workshop for their time and helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diving in Football, a Social Performance Table of Contents
    CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY Prifysgol Fetropolitan Caerdydd CARDIFF SCHOOL OF SPORT DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) SPORT STUDIES 2015-6 Diving in football, a social performance. Socio-Cultural George Richard Hunt Cardiff Metropolitan University Prifysgol Fetropolitan Caerdydd Certificate of student By submitting this document, I certify that the whole of this work is the result of my individual effort, that all quotations from books and journals have been acknowledged, and that the word count given below is a true and accurate record of the words contained (omitting contents pages, acknowledgements, indices, tables, figures, plates, reference list and appendices). I further certify that the work was either deemed to not need ethical approval or was entirely within the ethical approval granted under the code entered below. Ethical approval code: Exempt_____________________ (enter code or 'exempt') Word count: 11857 Name: George Hunt Date: 10/3/16 Certificate of Dissertation Supervisor responsible I am satisfied that this work is the result of the student’s own effort and was either deemed to not need ethical approval (as indicated by 'exempt' above) or was entirely within the ethical approval granted under the code entered above. I have received dissertation verification information from this student. Name: Date: Notes: The University owns the right to reprint all or part of this document. Diving in football, a social performance Table of Contents Acknowledgements Abstract CHAPTER 1. 1.0 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Symbolic Interactionism 2.2 Performance 2.3 Impression Management 2.4 Interaction order CHAPTER 3. 3.0 METHODS 3.1 Research Paradigm 3.2 Sampling strategy 3.3 Data Collection 3.4 Ethics 3.5 Data Analysis 3.6 Judgement Criteria CHAPTER 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Weber Writes 2010 Weber Writes 2010  I 2
    1 Weber Writes 2010 2 Weber Writes 2010 i Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................ii Research and Argument .................................................................1 Maryam Ahmad, “France’s War on Religious Garb” .............3 Liz Borg, “When it Comes to Sex and Jr.” ..............................9 Brandi Christensen, “Communism and Civil War”............. 13 Casey Crossley, “Integrity Deficit: The Scarcity of Honor in Cable News” .................................................... 18 Chris Cullen, “The Power of Misconception” .................... 28 Chase Dickinson, “Are Kids on a One-Way Path to Violence?” ............................................................ 35 Melissa Healy, “Lessons from a Lionfish”............................ 39 Feliciana Lopez, “The Low Cost of Always Low Prices” .......................................................... 43 Sarah Lundquist, “Women in the Military: The Army Combat Exclusion” ............................................... 48 Jamie Baer Mercado, “Radical or Rational?” ........................ 57 Olivia Newman, “Science Friction” ...................................... 63 Jason Nightengale, “Cheating and Steroids” ........................ 68 Paulette Padilla, “Grotesque Entertainment: Should It Be Legal?” ........................................................ 76 Dolly Palmer, “The Social and Physiological Separation of Space” ....................................................... 82 Michael Porter, “Are
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Weekly Bulletin 17-30 March 2020
    INTEGRITY IN SPORT Bi-weekly Bulletin 17-30 March 2020 Photos International Olympic Committee INTERPOL is not responsible for the content of these articles. The opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not represent the views of INTERPOL or its employees. INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin 17-30 March 2020 INVESTIGATIONS Pakistan PCB Charges Umar Akmal for Breaching Anti-Corruption Code Controversial Pakistan batsman Umar Akmal has been charged on Friday for two separate breaches of the Pakistan Cricket Board's Anti-Corruption Code. Umar, who was provisionally suspended on February 20 and barred from playing for his franchise, Quetta Gladiators in the Pakistan Super League, has been charged for failing to disclose corrupt approaches to the PCB Vigilance and Security Department (without unnecessary delay). If found guilty, Akmal could be banned from all forms of cricket for anywhere between six months and life. He was issued the charge sheet on March 17 and has been given time to respond until March 31. This was a breach under 2.4.4 for PCB's anti- corruption code. A Troubled Career Umar, 29, has had a chequered career since making his debut in August, 2009 and has since just managed to play 16 Tests, 121 ODIs and 84 T20 internationals for his country despite making a century on Test debut. His last appearance came in last October during a home T20 series against Sri Lanka and before that he also played in the March- April, 2019 one-day series against Australia in the UAE.
    [Show full text]
  • Nondestructive Testing Detects Altered Baseball Bats
    From NDT Technician , Vol. 11, No. 4, pp: 1 –5. Copyright © 2012 The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. The American Society for Nondestructive Testing www.asnt.org FOCUS Nondestructive Testing Detects Altered Baseball Bats Daniel A. Russell* Corked Wood Baseball Bats The prevalence of corked bats in X-rays and CT scans. Pete Rose Major League Baseball is not known was frequently accused of using The history of the game of baseball because players are caught only corked bats during his 1985 chase is peppered with interesting stories when the doctored bat breaks, of the all-time hits record, but no of attempts to break the rules. revealing the cork interior. For broken bats ever exposed cork. Managers have been caught stealing example, in 1974, New York Several of Rose’s bats from 1985 signs; groundskeepers have altered Yankees’ Graig Nettles shattered his are now in private collections. Cthe playing conditions of the field bat, sending several superballs Recent X-ray scans of two of these to the advantage of the home team; bouncing around home plate. In bats show that they were indeed pitchers have used petroleum jelly, 1987, Houston Astros outfielder corked. 3 mud, emery boards, or thumbtacks Billy Hatcher’s bat broke and one of Following the Sosa corked bat to alter the surface of the baseball; the pieces ended up in the hands of incident in 2003, the Major League and Major League Baseball players Chicago Cubs third baseman Keith Baseball commissioner’s office like Albert Belle, Norm Cash, Graig Moreland, who promptly showed ordered that X-ray scans be taken Nettles, and Sammy Sosa, have used the exposed cork filling to the of the rest of Sosa’s bats, including 1,4 corked bats.
    [Show full text]