DOCSLIB.ORG

Value Island Biodiversity It’S Our Life!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Value Island Biodiversity It’S Our Life! VALUE ISLAND BIODivERSITY It’s Our Life! Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme 1 CONTENTS Introduction Introduction David Sheppard, Director SPREP 3 VALUE ISLAND BIODIVERSITY Campaign Launch Kosi Latu, Deputy Director SPREP 5 It’s Our Life! Pacific getting ready to meet new targets 6 Emerald of the Isles 7 David Sheppard, Director, SPREP Rare giant box crab 7 he Pacific islands region swung into action The hive of activity across the region culmi- Micronesia’s Go Local 9 T with determination to observe 2010 as the nated at the 10th Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD International Year of Biodiversity (IYOB). COP10) in Nagoya, Japan. The region’s COP10 Climate Change and Invasive Species 10 communication strategy, The Pacific Voyage, The Biodiversity Bus 11 In 2009 following discussions with participants a flower, was used to convey the over-arch- highlighted the unique biodiversity of the Pa- at the Nature Conservation Roundtable held in ing message that we are all intertwined with cific islands and showcased our PYOB activities Pacific Ocean for your Children 12 Solomon Islands, a draft framework for imple- nature. to the world. The Pacific Voyage also served to menting the International Year of Biodiversity enable the Pacific islands to be heard during The slogan, Value Island Biodiversity – it’s our life, (IYOB) in the Pacific was circulated regionally negotiations and discussions as one voice. And Island Wear Biodiversity and Fashion 13 resounded well with many of SPREP’s Pacific for comment and input. Member countries and we were successful! Issues of importance to island members and was used extensively in territories then endorsed the framework at the the region – invasive species, climate change, Polynesia, Micronesia Challenged 18 correspondence and other publications, and 20th SPREP Meeting held in Apia in 2009 and coastal and marine biodiversity and financing on stickers and posters. We were proud to see © Stuart Chape committed to taking action to observe a Pacif- – were placed firmly on the negotiating table Development and Poverty Alleviation 19 that some of our members chose to develop ic focused IYOB during 2010–2011. In February and included in the final agreement. their own national logos which were used 2010 the Pacific islands region swung into ac- CBD COP10 21 to gain ownership and promote biodiversity This magazine showcases some of the high- tion to celebrate the Pacific Year of Biodiversity conservation across communities. lights of the Pacific Year of Biodiversity and (PYOB). honours the conservation practitioners, scien- Pacific Marine Biodiversity Report 22 The PYOB also sought to highlight links be- A significant aspect of the PYOB was the number tists, donors, government officials, educators, tween aspects of biodiversity conservation and of partnerships formed through goodwill com- journalists and Pacific island communities who Mangroves in the Pacific 22 climate change resilience and adaptation that mitments. Non-governmental organizations, continue to appreciate, respect and value our is- were produced by the Secretariat, building on the SPREP Secretariat, government agencies land biodiversity as an integral part of our lives. 2010 Vision Pasifika Media Award 23 the region’s efforts during the 2009 Year of Cli- and local communities found ways of working mate Change. Several countries also chose to Value Island Biodiversity – It’s together for a common purpose. Making Conservation Fun 24 look at messages of food and nutrition, health our life! The Pacific nature-inspired logo, featuring dif- and well-being in the context of biodiversity Saving a Landmark 25 ferent uses of nature within the outline of conservation. Ocean Voices 26 Pacific Mangrove Initiative 28 SPREP Library/IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication Data he Pacific Biodiversity logo has been developed as part of the Pacific island region’s Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) Environmental Ambassadors 28 Value Island Biodiversity: It’s Our Life! – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2011. T input to the 2010 International Year of Biodiversity. 36 p. : col. ill. ; 29 cm. ISBN: 978-982-04-0421-2 (print)| Pacific Islands Roundtable for Nature Conservation 29 The Pacific Biodiversity logo seeks to convey the Organisations and institutions were encouraged 978-982-04-0422-9 (online) 1. Biodiversity – Oceania. 2. Conservation of natural resources – Oceania importance of biodiversity to the health, wealth, to consider using the Pacific logo on their email I. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) II. Title. Celebrating Pacific Biodiversity 30 cultures and overall well-being of Pacific island correspondence to help promote awareness of 333.95 people. The greens and blues highlight the link biodiversity conservation. Cover photography: Left: © Stuart Chape; Centre and right: © Jenny Basset, UCWA. IYB 2010 in Pictures 32 between our marine and terrestrial ecosystems Design: Joanne Aitken, The Little Design Company During the International Year, the logo was used Compiled by: Clive Hawigen – Intern, 2010 IYB Campaign Coordinator while the overall shape tries to convey the aes- with the logo for the International Year of Biodi- With assistance from SPREP team: Easter Galuvao – Biodiversity Advisor thetic value of biodiversity. The images in each Seema Deo – Education and Social Communication Advisor SPREP’s Work in 2010 34 versity. SPREP encourages countries to continue Nanette Woonton – Media and Public Relations Officer petal highlight the intricate links between hu- using the logo during the Decade of Biodiversi- Posa Skelton – Pacific Invasives Learning Coordinator mans and the environment. © SPREP 2011 ty (2011–2020). The Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme authorizes The logo was used widely across the Pacif- the reproduction of this material, whole or in part, provided appropriate The logo is downloadable from the SPREP web- acknowledgment is given. ic during the Year of Biodiversity to help bring site (www.sprep.org) with details on how to add This publication is also available electronically from SPREP’s web site: www.sprep.org biodiversity conservation to the forefront of de- it to your email template. SPREP T: +685 21 929 CONTRIBUTORS velopment planning. PO BOX 240 F: +685 20 231 Apia E: [email protected] A big thank you to those who contributed: Samoa W: www.sprep.org Pacific Biodiversity Blog: http//bionesian.blogspot.com/ • BioNET PACINET • Mari Moertvedt The Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) is the intergovernmental agency charged with the protection and sustainable management • SPREP’s Island Ecosystem Programme • Dr Lois Englberger and the Island Food of the Pacific island region’s environment. SPREP’s vision is for a Pacific environment, sustaining our livelihoods and natural heritage in harmony with our cultures. • MereTalei Joan Komailevuka and the Fiji Ministry Community of Pohnpei (IFCP) SPREP works at the forefront of regional efforts to address environmental concerns by providing national-level technical advice, programme support, human and of Environment • Randy Thaman institutional capacity building and coordinated regional responses to global issues and international agreements. The SPREP membership comprises 21 Pacific island countries • Easter Galuvao • Jaive Smare and territories and Australia, New Zealand, France and United States of America. The work of SPREP is guided by a 5-year Strategic Plan (2011–2015) which was formally • COP10 Pacific Voyage Media Team: Bernadette • Deyna March and Tauraki Raea adopted at the 21st SPREP Meeting in Papua New Guinea in September 2010. For more information regarding SPREP and SPREP’s contributions to conservation, resource Carreon, Mata’afa Keni Lesa and Nanette Woonton • Rajan Sami management and sustainable development, please visit: www.sprep.org. • Anouk Ride • Maggie Boyle 2 3 Pseudobulweria macgillivrayi Notopteris macdonaldi Pacific Year of Biodiversity LAUNCH Kosi Latu, Deputy Director, SPREP o matter where we live on this planet, occur in the Melanesian islands, New Caledonia N Biodiversity – the variety of life on earth and Polynesia-Micronesia. – remains the foundation of all human life. Our Despite our recognition of the uniqueness of our natural heritage, we in the Pacific have taken our physical, economic, cultural and social well-being biodiversity for granted, allowing many policies is wholly dependent on what nature and natural and practices which contribute to the loss of systems can provide. our biodiversity and deterioration of our natural environments. In the Pacific, as elsewhere on the planet, our Unfortunately, 8 years later, all reports are point- This year, the Year of Biodiversity, is the Pacific’s entire cultures have been determined by our ing to the fact that we may have actually in- opportunity to turn things around. The Year Pseudobulweria macgillivrayi or the Fiji Petrel, locally known as the Kacau ni Gau is and Notopteris macdonaldi or the Fiji Blossom Bat (known locally in Fiji as ikua). It is native to natural environment and the different plant and creased the rate of loss of biodiversity across the island endemic bird of Fiji. It is critically endangered. Kacau ni Gau is a sea bird, presumed to Fiji and Vanuatu, although its population is considered to be vulnerable. It dwells in caves and will focus on encouraging the development nest in burrows on high ridges in the interior of the Gau island and disperse to pelagic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Material Local and Expert
    10.1071/PC14920_AC CSIRO 2015 Pacific Conservation Biology 21 (3), 214-219 Supplementary material Local and expert knowledge improve conservation assessment of rare and iconic Fijian tree species Gunnar KeppelA,F, Alifereti NaikatiniB, Isaac A. RoundsC, Robert L. PresseyD, and Nunia T. ThomasE ASchool of Natural and Built Environments and Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. BSouth Pacific Regional Herbarium, University of the South Pacific CConservation International, Suva, Fiji DAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811 Australia. ENatureFiji-MareqetiViti, 14 Hamilton-Beattie Street, Suva, Fiji FCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Part 1: Overview of conservation status for each study species before this study. Acmopyle sahniana Buchholz & N.E. Gray (Podocarpaceae) is a rare conifer to 12 m tall, previously only reported from forested mountain ridges from central Viti Levu (Bush and Doyle 1997, Thomas 2013a). A detailed survey of the species recorded a total of 46 adult and 17 juvenile trees in 2 subpopulations (Bush 1997). A recent (2011) assessment reported another subpopulation near Fiji’s highest mountain, Mt. Tomanivi, and estimated the total size of that subpopulation at <100 mature individuals (Thomas 2013a). The species is listed as critically endangered (CR), based on small population size and low area of occupancy (<10 km2) (Thomas 2013a). Cynometra falcata A.Gray (Leguminosae) is reported as a slender tree to 4 m in height that until recently had only been known from two locations, one on Vanua Levu and another on Viti Levu (Smith 1985, WCMC 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Primitive Angiosperm Flower – a Discussion*
    Acta Bot. Neerl. 23(4), August 1974, p. 461-471. The structure and function of the primitive Angiosperm flower – a discussion* Gerhard Gottsberger Departamentode Botanica, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas e Biologicas de Botucatu, Estado de Sao Paulo, Brazil SUMMARY Morphological and functional features of primitive entomophilous Angiosperm flowers are discussed and confronted with modem conceptions onearly Angiosperm differentiation. Evidence is put forward to show that large, solitary and terminally-borne flowers are not most primitive in the Angiosperms, but rather middle-sized ones, groupedinto lateral flower aggregates or inflorescences. It is believed that most primitive, still unspecialized Angiosperm flowers were pollinated casuallyby beetles. Only in a later phase did they graduallybecome adaptedto the more effective but more devastating type of beetle pollination. Together with this specialization, flower enlargment, reduction of inflorescences, numerical increase of stamens and carpels, and their more dense aggregationand flatteningmight have occurred. In have maintained the archaic condi- regard to pollination,many primitive Angiosperms tion of because beetles still dominant insect whereas in cantharophily, are a group, dispersal they have been largely forced to switch over from the archaic saurochory to the more modern modes of dispersal by birds and mammals,since duringthe later Mesozoic the dominance of reptiles had come to an end. The prevailing ideas regarding the primitiveness of Angiosperm flower struc- be somewhat Is the
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes
    55 (4) • November 2006: 837–856 Qiu & al. • Basal angiosperm phylogeny Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes Yin-Long Qiu1, Libo Li, Tory A. Hendry, Ruiqi Li, David W. Taylor, Michael J. Issa, Alexander J. Ronen, Mona L. Vekaria & Adam M. White 1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, The University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). Three mitochondrial (atp1, matR, nad5), four chloroplast (atpB, matK, rbcL, rpoC2), and one nuclear (18S) genes from 162 seed plants, representing all major lineages of gymnosperms and angiosperms, were analyzed together in a supermatrix or in various partitions using likelihood and parsimony methods. The results show that Amborella + Nymphaeales together constitute the first diverging lineage of angiosperms, and that the topology of Amborella alone being sister to all other angiosperms likely represents a local long branch attrac- tion artifact. The monophyly of magnoliids, as well as sister relationships between Magnoliales and Laurales, and between Canellales and Piperales, are all strongly supported. The sister relationship to eudicots of Ceratophyllum is not strongly supported by this study; instead a placement of the genus with Chloranthaceae receives moderate support in the mitochondrial gene analyses. Relationships among magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots remain unresolved. Direct comparisons of analytic results from several data partitions with or without RNA editing sites show that in multigene analyses, RNA editing has no effect on well supported rela- tionships, but minor effect on weakly supported ones. Finally, comparisons of results from separate analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes demonstrate that mitochondrial genes, with overall slower rates of sub- stitution than chloroplast genes, are informative phylogenetic markers, and are particularly suitable for resolv- ing deep relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytochrome-B Evidence for Validity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Pseudobulweria and Bulweria (Procellariidae)
    The Auk 115(1):188-195, 1998 CYTOCHROME-B EVIDENCE FOR VALIDITY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF PSEUDOBULWERIA AND BULWERIA (PROCELLARIIDAE) VINCENT BRETAGNOLLE,•'5 CAROLE A3VFII•,2 AND ERIC PASQUET3'4 •CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Beauvoirsur Niort, France; 2Villiers en Bois, 79360 Beauvoirsur Niort, France; 3Laboratoirede ZoologieMammi•res et Oiseaux,Museum National d'Histoire Naturelie, 55 rue Buffon,75005 Paris, France; and 4Laboratoirede Syst•matiquemol•culaire, CNRS-GDR 1005, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelie, 43 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France ABSTRACT.--Althoughthe genus Pseudobulweria was described in 1936for the Fiji Petrel (Ps.macgillivrayi), itsvalidity, phylogenetic relationships, and the number of constituenttaxa it containsremain controversial. We tried to clarifythese issues with 496bp sequencesfrom the mitochondrialcytochrome-b gene of 12 taxa representingthree putative subspecies of Pseudobulweria,seven species in six othergenera of the Procellariidae(fulmars, petrels, and shearwaters),and onespecies each from the Hydrobatidae(storm-petrels) and Pelecanoidi- dae (diving-petrels).We alsoinclude published sequences for two otherpetrels (Procellaria cinereaand Macronectesgiganteus ) and use Diomedeaexulans and Pelecanuserythrorhynchos as outgroups.Based on thepronounced sequence divergence (5 to 5.5%)and separate phylo- genetichistory from othergenera that havebeen thought to be closelyrelated to or have beensynonymized with Pseudobulweria,we conclude that the genusis valid, and that the MascarenePetrel (Pseudobulweria aterrima)
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladaceae
    Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100
    [Show full text]
  • AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species 02 05 Restore Canada Jay as the English name of Perisoreus canadensis 03 13 Recognize two genera in Stercorariidae 04 15 Split Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus) into two species 05 19 Split Pseudobulweria from Pterodroma 06 25 Add Tadorna tadorna (Common Shelduck) to the Checklist 07 27 Add three species to the U.S. list 08 29 Change the English names of the two species of Gallinula that occur in our area 09 32 Change the English name of Leistes militaris to Red-breasted Meadowlark 10 35 Revise generic assignments of woodpeckers of the genus Picoides 11 39 Split the storm-petrels (Hydrobatidae) into two families 1 2018-B-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 280 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species Effect on NACC: This proposal would change the species circumscription of Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus by splitting it into four species. The form that occurs in the NACC area is nominate pacificus, so the current species account would remain unchanged except for the distributional statement and notes. Background: The Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus was until recently (e.g., Chantler 1999, 2000) considered to consist of four subspecies: pacificus, kanoi, cooki, and leuconyx. Nominate pacificus is highly migratory, breeding from Siberia south to northern China and Japan, and wintering in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The other subspecies are either residents or short distance migrants: kanoi, which breeds from Taiwan west to SE Tibet and appears to winter as far south as southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Fiji: the State of the World's Forest Genetic Resources
    REPUBLIC OF FIJI This country report is prepared as a contribution to the FAO publication, The Report on the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources. The content and the structure are in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines given by FAO in the document Guidelines for Preparation of Country Reports for the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources (2010). These guidelines set out recommendations for the objective, scope and structure of the country reports. Countries were requested to consider the current state of knowledge of forest genetic diversity, including: Between and within species diversity List of priority species; their roles and values and importance List of threatened/endangered species Threats, opportunities and challenges for the conservation, use and development of forest genetic resources These reports were submitted to FAO as official government documents. The report is presented on www. fao.org/documents as supportive and contextual information to be used in conjunction with other documentation on world forest genetic resources. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO may not be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this report. STATE OF THE FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES IN FIJI Department of Forests Ministry of Fisheries and Forests for The Republic of Fiji Islands and the Secreatriat of Pacific Communities (SPC) State of the Forest Genetic Resources in Fiji _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Executve Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 5 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 6 Chapter 1: The Current State of the Forest Genetic Resources in Fiji ………………………………………………………………….…….
    [Show full text]
  • Character Evolution in Anaxagorea (Annonaceae)
    QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ Scharaschkin, Tanya and Doyle, James A. (2006) Character evolution in Anaxagorea (Annonaceae). American Journal of Botany 93(1):pp. 36-54. © Copyright 2006 Botanical Society of America American Journal of Botany 93(1): 36±54. 2006. CHARACTER EVOLUTION IN ANAXAGOREA (ANNONACEAE)1 TANYA SCHARASCHKIN2,3 AND JAMES A. DOYLE2 2Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA Anaxagorea is a critical genus for understanding morphological evolution in Annonaceae because it shares a variety of features with other Magnoliales that have been interpreted as primitive relative to other Annonaceae. We present a detailed discussion of morphological characters used in a combined morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of Anaxagorea, along with impli- cations of the analysis for character evolution in the genus. In spite of a high level of homoplasy in stamen and leaf venation characters, their removal results in loss of resolution in the trees obtained. The distributions of characters on trees con®rm assumptions that several distinctive similarities between Anaxagorea and other Magnoliales are primitive retentions (e.g., the presence of an adaxial plate of xylem in the midrib, nonpeltate stamen connectives, inner staminodes, and several leaf architectural characters). However, lateral extensions of the ``laminar'' stamens, though possibly ancestral in Anaxagorea, are convergent with those in other Magnoliales. A number of morphological synapomorphies have been identi®ed for a clade containing most Central American species and another comprising all Asian species (e.g., conical bud shape and reduced inner petals for the Central American clade, and adaxial cuticular striations and capitate stigma shape for the Asian clade).
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnosperms on the EDGE Félix Forest1, Justin Moat 1,2, Elisabeth Baloch1, Neil A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Gymnosperms on the EDGE Félix Forest1, Justin Moat 1,2, Elisabeth Baloch1, Neil A. Brummitt3, Steve P. Bachman 1,2, Stef Ickert-Bond 4, Peter M. Hollingsworth5, Aaron Liston6, Damon P. Little7, Sarah Mathews8,9, Hardeep Rai10, Catarina Rydin11, Dennis W. Stevenson7, Philip Thomas5 & Sven Buerki3,12 Driven by limited resources and a sense of urgency, the prioritization of species for conservation has Received: 12 May 2017 been a persistent concern in conservation science. Gymnosperms (comprising ginkgo, conifers, cycads, and gnetophytes) are one of the most threatened groups of living organisms, with 40% of the species Accepted: 28 March 2018 at high risk of extinction, about twice as many as the most recent estimates for all plants (i.e. 21.4%). Published: xx xx xxxx This high proportion of species facing extinction highlights the urgent action required to secure their future through an objective prioritization approach. The Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) method rapidly ranks species based on their evolutionary distinctiveness and the extinction risks they face. EDGE is applied to gymnosperms using a phylogenetic tree comprising DNA sequence data for 85% of gymnosperm species (923 out of 1090 species), to which the 167 missing species were added, and IUCN Red List assessments available for 92% of species. The efect of diferent extinction probability transformations and the handling of IUCN data defcient species on the resulting rankings is investigated. Although top entries in our ranking comprise species that were expected to score well (e.g. Wollemia nobilis, Ginkgo biloba), many were unexpected (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Molecular Dating, and Floral Evolution of Magnoliidae (Angiospermae)
    UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SUD ÉCOLE DOCTORALE : SCIENCES DU VÉGÉTAL Laboratoire Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution DISCIPLINE : BIOLOGIE THÈSE DE DOCTORAT Soutenue le 11/04/2014 par Julien MASSONI Phylogeny, molecular dating, and floral evolution of Magnoliidae (Angiospermae) Composition du jury : Directeur de thèse : Hervé SAUQUET Maître de Conférences (Université Paris-Sud) Rapporteurs : Susanna MAGALLÓN Professeur (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) Thomas HAEVERMANS Maître de Conférences (Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle) Examinateurs : Catherine DAMERVAL Directeur de Recherche (CNRS, INRA) Michel LAURIN Directeur de Recherche (CNRS, Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle) Florian JABBOUR Maître de Conférences (Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle) Michael PIRIE Maître de Conférences (Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz) Membres invités : Hervé SAUQUET Maître de Conférences (Université Paris-Sud) Remerciements Je tiens tout particulièrement à remercier mon directeur de thèse et ami Hervé Sauquet pour son encadrement, sa gentillesse, sa franchise et la confiance qu’il m’a accordée. Cette relation a immanquablement contribuée à ma progression humaine et scientifique. La pratique d’une science sans frontière est la plus belle chose qu’il m’ait apportée. Ce fut enthousiasmant, très fructueux, et au-delà de mes espérances. Ce mode de travail sera le mien pour la suite de ma carrière. Je tiens également à remercier ma copine Anne-Louise dont le soutien immense a contribué à la réalisation de ce travail. Elle a vécu avec patience et attention les moments d’enthousiasmes et de doutes. Par la même occasion, je remercie ma fille qui a eu l’heureuse idée de ne pas naître avant la fin de la rédaction de ce manuscrit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Distribution of the Malesian Podocarps Neal J
    4 Ecology and Distribution of the Malesian Podocarps Neal J. Enright and Tanguy Jaffré ABSTRACT. Podocarp species and genus richness is higher in the Malesian region than anywhere else on earth, with maximum genus richness in New Guinea and New Caledo- nia and maximum species richness in New Guinea and Borneo. Members of the Podo- carpaceae occur across the whole geographic and altitudinal range occupied by forests and shrublands in the region. There is a strong tendency for podocarp dominance of vegetation to be restricted either to high- altitude sites close to the limit of tree growth or to other sites that might restrict plant growth in terms of water relations and nutri- ent supply (e.g., skeletal soils on steep slopes and ridges, heath forests, ultramafic parent material). Although some species are widespread in lowland forests, they are generally present at very low density, raising questions concerning their regeneration ecology and competitive ability relative to co- occurring angiosperm tree species. A number of species in the region are narrowly distributed, being restricted to single islands or mountain tops, and are of conservation concern. Our current understanding of the distribution and ecology of Malesian podocarps is reviewed in this chapter, and areas for further research are identified. INTRODUCTION The Malesian region has the highest diversity of southern conifers (i.e., Podocarpaceae and Araucariaceae) in the world (Enright and Hill, 1995). It is a large and heterogeneous area, circumscribing tropical and subtropical lowland to montane forest (and some shrubland) assemblages, extending from Tonga in Neal J. Enright, School of Environmental Science, the east to India in the west and from the subtropical forests of eastern Australia Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Austra- in the south to Taiwan and Nepal in the north (Figure 4.1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Biodiversity Assessment of Emalu Forest, Navosa Province-Fiji REDD+ Pilot Site
    A Rapid Biodiversity Assessment & Archaeological Survey of the Fiji REDD+ Pilot Site: Emalu Forest, Viti Levu Editors: Marika V. Tuiwawa, Sarah Pene, Senilolia H. Tuiwawa Compiled by the Institute of Applied Sciences, University of the South Pacific, for the Forestry Department of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Republic of the Fiji Islands; and SPC/GIZ ‘Coping with Climate Change in the Pacific Island Region’ Programme August 2013 Table of Contents Organisational Profiles & Authors ..................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 Maps ................................................................................................................................ 6 Photographs ................................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 34 CHAPTER 2: Flora, Vegetation & Ecology .......................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 3: Herpetofauna ............................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 4: Avifauna .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]