DOCSLIB.ORG

Ipv6 Research and Development in Europe Libro Ipv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ipv6 Research and Development in Europe Libro Ipv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 2 Cubierta 16/10/02 13:33 Página 1 Libro IPv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 1 IPv6 Research and Development in Europe Libro IPv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 2 IPv6 Cluster Index of contents Page Content 4 Participants 6 Country Codes & Project Types 7 IPv6 Research and Development in Europe 17 IPv6 Cluster Projects Project Project Name Website 18 6HOP Protocols for Heterogeneous Multi-Hop Wireless IPv6 Networks 20 6INIT IPv6 INternet IniTiative http://www.6init.org 22 6LINK IPv6 Projects Linkage Cluster http://www.6link.org 24 6NET Large-scale International IPv6 Pilot Network http://www.sixnet.org 26 6POWER IPv6, QoS & Power Line Integration http://www.6power.org 28 6QM IPv6 QoS Measurement http://www.6qm.org 30 6WINIT IPv6 Wireless Internet IniTiative http://www.6winit.org 32 Euro6IX European IPv6 Internet Exchanges Backbone http://www.euro6ix.net 34 Eurov6 The European IPv6 Showcase http://www.eurov6.org 36 GCAP Global Communication Architecture & http://www.laas.fr/gcap Protocols for new QoS services over IPv6 networks 38 IPv6 TF-SC IPv6 Task Force Steering Committee http://www.ipv6tf-sc.org 40 LONG Laboratories over Next Generation Networks http://www.ist-long.com 42 OverDRiVE Spectrum Efficient Uni- and Multicast http://www.ist-overdrive.org Services Over Dynamic Multi-Radio Networks in Vehicular Environments 44 SATIP6 Satellite Broadband Multimedia Systems http://satip6.tilab.com for IPv6 Access 46 @HOM Network @ppliances and services http://www.at-hom.org for the Home environment 48 ANDROID Active Networks Distributed Open http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/android Infrastructure Development 50 CRUMPET Creation of User Friendly Mobile Services http://www.ist-crumpet.org Personalised for Tourism 52 DRiVE Dynamic Radio for IP-Services http://www.ist-drive.org in Vehicular Environments IPv6 Cluster 54 FUTURE HOME Future Home http://future-home.vtt.mediapoli.com/fh/public IPv6 Research and Development in Europe 56 GÉANT The pan-European Gigabit research network http://www.geant.net 58 HARMONICS Hybrid Access Reconfigurable http://www.ist-harmonics.net Multi-wavelength Optical Networks Edited by the IPv6 Cluster with the support of 6LINK. for IP-based Communication Services 60 INTERMON Advanced architecture for INTER-domain http://www.ist-intermon.org This booklet was first published in November 2002 during the IST2002 conference in quality of service Copenhagen, Denmark. 62 MESCAL Management of End-to-end Quality http://www.ist-mescal.org Editorial team: of Service Across the Internet at Large 64 MIND Mobile IP based Network Developments http://www.ist-mind.org Jordi Palet - Responsible for All-IPv6-World WG and IST2002/IPv6 Activities 66 Moby Dick Mobility and Differentiated Services http://ist-mobydick.org Matthew Ford - IPv6 Cluster Chair in a Future IP Network Pascal Drabik - EC Scientific Officer 68 NGNi Next Generation Networks Initiative http://www.ngni.org Jose-Joaquim Fernandes - EC Scientific Officer 70 NGN-LAB Next Generation Networks Laboratories http://www.ngn-lab.org 72 SEEREN South Eastern European Research http://www.seeren.org This booklet was made possible thanks to the cooperation and contributions of the IPv6 and Education Networking Cluster projects, and from the participants of the All-IPv6-World Working Group. 74 TORRENT Technology for a Realistic End User Access http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/torrent If you have any questions or comments or you would like to receive another copy of this Network Test-bed 76 WirelessCabin Development and Demonstrator http://www.wirelesscabin.com book, please visit http://www.ist-ipv6.org. On-line PDF version also available. of Wireless Access for Multimedia Copyright 2002 EC IST IPv6 Cluster. Services in Aircraft Cabins 78 xMOTION eMobile Test-bed for Interoperabilily http://www.ist-xmotion.org Reproduction in whole or in part is only authorized with explicit reference to this source. of Networks in eLogistics 2 IPv6 Research and Development in Europe IPv6 Research and Development in Europe 3 Libro IPv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 4 Participants & Projects Participant Projects Participant Projects Participant Projects Participant Projects 6WIND 6POWER,6WINIT, ANDROID, ESYS WirelessCabin Microsoft xMOTION Tesion TORRENT Euro6IX, GCAP, NGNi ETH Zürich Moby Dick Motorola @HOM, Moby Dick, Thales MESCAL ACOnet 6NET, GÉANT ETRI 6WINIT OverDRiVE Thomson 6INIT AGH Univ. Tech. Moby Dick EURECOM Moby Dick Motorola TCI @HOM Thomson M. FUTURE HOME Agora 6POWER, MIND Eurocontrol Euro6IX NEC INTERMON, Moby Dick, TID Euro6IX, INTERMON, LONG Airbus WirelessCabin FCCN GÉANT NGN-LAB TILAB @HOM, Euro6IX, Airtel Euro6IX Flextel TORRENT Netcelo ANDROID INTERMON, SATIP6 Algonet S.A. MESCAL Fokus 6NET, 6QM, CRUMPET, Nokia DRiVE, FUTURE HOME T-Mobile xMOTION AMREJ SEEREN FUTURE HOME, GCAP, Nokia Corporation MIND T-Nova 6INIT, 6LINK, 6WINIT, AQL 6HOP, SATIP6 INTERMON NORDUnet 6NET, GÉANT Euro6IX, HARMONICS, ARNES GÉANT Fraunhofer G. Moby Dick Nortel CRUMPET, LONG INTERMON, IPv6 TF-SC, ASPI GCAP, SATIP6 Fresenius xMOTION novaGnet Euro6IX MIND, Moby Dick, BBC DRiVE FT 6QM, @HOM, Euro6IX, NTT 6WINIT xMOTION BELNET GÉANT MESCAL, MIND, NTT DoCoMo MIND Tomorrow Focus FUTURE HOME BEN xMOTION OverDRiVE, SATIP6, NTT-Com 6NET TriaGnoSys WirelessCabin Bertelsmann DRiVE FTW Moby Dick NTUA ANDROID TZI 6WINIT BIBA xMOTION FUnet 6NET OHB Teledata xMOTION U. Cantabria 6HOP BIHARNET SEEREN GARR 6NET Opensugar @HOM U. Karslruhe GCAP Bosch DRiVE Genuity TORRENT OTEC TORRENT U. Limerick HARMONICS BT 6INIT, 6LINK, 6WINIT, GRNET 6NET, GÉANT, SEEREN Oulu Poly 6NET U. of Bradford WirelessCabin ANDROID, Euro6IX, HEAnet GÉANT Oy Media 6INIT U. of Stuttgart Moby Dick IPv6 TF-SC, MIND HEL 6QM Pace 6POWER U. Oulu 6HOP, 6NET, IPv6 TF-SC CEFRIEL FUTURE HOME HHI DRiVE Philips 6HOP, IPv6 TF-SC U. Soton 6INIT, 6LINK, 6NET, Celtius xMOTION HIT 6QM PSNC GÉANT 6WINIT, Euro6IX, CESNET GÉANT HUNGARNET GÉANT, SEEREN PTIN CRUMPET, Euro6IX, IPv6 TF-SC CiaoLab FUTURE HOME IABG 6WINIT HARMONICS, LONG, U. Twente xMOTION CINI-ITME INTERMON IB 6INIT Moby Dick, TORRENT UC3M 6LINK, GCAP, LONG, Cisco 6NET, NGN-LAB IBM 6NET QMUL CRUMPET, TORRENT Moby Dick Consulintel 6LINK, 6POWER, 6QM, ICTDA SEEREN RAI OverDRiVE UCL 6LINK, 6NET, 6WINIT, Euro6IX, Eurov6, IKOM xMOTION RENATER 6NET, GÉANT ANDROID, MESCAL IPv6 TF-SC IMCS LU GÉANT ResCom NGN-LAB UEV LONG Corning HARMONICS IMEC HARMONICS RESTENA GÉANT Uhe CRUMPET CRM 6LINK Infineon technologies MIND RoEduNet GÉANT, SEEREN UKERNA 6NET, GÉANT CTI 6NET INFN GÉANT Rosenbauer xMOTION UKT 6WINIT CTU GCAP INFP 6INIT RUS 6WINIT ULANC 6NET, GCAP CWC Moby Dick INIMA SEEREN RWTH DriVE, OverDRiVE ULB 6NET, Eurov6, NGN-LAB CYNET GÉANT Inmarsat WirelessCabin SANET GÉANT ULP 6NET Daimler Chrysler DriVE, OverDRiVE INRIA 6NET Siemens INTERMON, IPv6 TF-SC, UMM 6WINIT DANTE 6LINK, 6NET, GÉANT, SEEREN Intracom 6HOP, 6INIT, HARMONICS, MIND, NGNi, WirelessCabin, UMU 6POWER, Euro6IX DFN 6NET, GÉANT TORRENT xMOTION Uni Bern INTERMON Dimension D. NGN-LAB Invenia 6NET SINTEF SATIP6 UNI Bonn DriVE, OverDRiVE DLR WirelessCabin IUCC GÉANT Sonera CRUMPET Uni Do INTERMON DS2 6POWER KID Systeme WirelessCabin Sony 6NET, @HOM, MIND UNINETT 6NET DTT-BUTE INTERMON King's College London MIND SR-ANC INTERMON UniS DriVE, MESCAL, OverDRiVE DTU 6NET KPN Rch. HARMONICS Steria DRiVE UoM GÉANT E&A Abogados Euro6IX KTU GÉANT SURFnet 6NET, GÉANT UoR SATIP6 EENET GÉANT LAAS/CNRS GCAP, SATIP6 SWITCH 6NET, GÉANT UPC LONG EML CRUMPET Land Bremen xMOTION TED 6INIT, 6WINIT, Euro6IX, UPM 6LINK, ANDROID, Euro6IX, Emorphia CRUMPET LIP6 GCAP GCAP, NGNi LONG, MIND Endesa 6POWER LM Ericsson IPv6 TF-SC Telekom Austria GCAP UST TORRENT ENSICA GCAP Lucent HARMONICS Telematic Solutions xMOTION VCON DRiVE Ericsson 6WINIT, DRiVE, Eurov6, MARNET SEEREN Telenor TORRENT Versaware TORRENT OverDRiVE, WirelessCabin Martel GmbH NGNi Telia 6INIT Vodafone DRiVE Ericsson D OverDRiVE Mason HARMONICS TELIN 6NET VTT 6WINIT, FUTURE HOME Ericsson I OverDRiVE MCLab 6POWER, NGN-LAB, Telscom 6INIT, 6LINK, Euro6IX, VUB NGN-LAB Ericsson M. DRiVE TORRENT Eurov6, NGNi, NGN-LAB WIT INTERMON, TORRENT Ericsson Radio Sys. MIND MCYT GÉANT Teracom DRiVE WRAP FUTURE HOME Ericsson-Pol 6WINIT MediaSec ANDROID TERENA 6LINK, 6NET, SEEREN WWU 6NET 4 IPv6 Research and Development in Europe IPv6 Research and Development in Europe 5 Libro IPv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 6 IPv6 Cluster IPv6 Cluster Country Codes Country Code Country A Austria AL Albania B Belgium BA Bosnia and Herzegovina BG Bulgaria CH Switzerland CY Cyprus CZ Czech Republic D Germany DK Denmark E Spain EE Estonia EL Greece F France FIN Finland YU Yugoslavia MD Macedonia HU Hungary I Italy IL Israel IRL Ireland JP Japan KR South Korea LT Latvia LU Luxemburg MT Malta NL Netherlands NO Norway IPv6 Research P Portugal PL Poland RO Romania S Sweden SG Singapore and Development SI Slovenia SK Slovakia UK United Kingdom US United States of America in Europe Project Types AM Accompanying Measures RTD Research and Technology Development TN Thematic Network TU Take-Up 6 IPv6 Research and Development in Europe IPv6 Research and Development in Europe 7 Libro IPv6 16/10/02 13:31 Página 8 IPv6 Cluster IPv6 Cluster Some interesting features to mention are the removal of the checksum field from the IPv6 header (checksumming is now performed by upper layers), and the removal of frag- mentation-related fields (fragmentation is performed end-to-end). In fact, most IPv6 “options” (now called “extension headers”, with no limit to their size or number), are also processed end-to-end, obviating the need for routers to perform tasks other than simple packet forwarding. Taken together, these features provide the means for restoring the end-to-end Internet paradigm, facilitating peer-to-peer applications, end-to-end security, and avoiding network address translators. 3. IPv6 in the 5th Framework Programme The European Commission Information Society Technologies Programme is funding a number of projects with a very important focus on IPv6 research and development acti- vities. These projects represent a huge investment on behalf of the EC (over 90M) and the project partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accelerating Adoption of Ipv6
    Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 LUDVIG AHLINDER and ANDERS ERIKSSON KTH Information and Communication Technology Degree project in Communication Systems First level, 15.0 HEC Stockholm, Sweden Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 Ludvig Ahlinder and Anders Eriksson 2011.05.17 Mentor and Examiner: Prof. Gerald Q. Maguire Jr School of Information and Communications Technology Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden Abstract It has long been known that the number of unique IPv4-addresses would be exhausted because of the rapid expansion of the Internet and because countries such as China and India are becoming more and more connected to the rest of the world. IPv6 is a new version of the Internet Protocol which is supposed to succeed the old version, IPv4, in providing more addresses and new services. The biggest challenge of information and communication technology (ICT) today is to transition from IPv4 to IPv6. The purpose of this thesis is to accelerate the adoption of IPv6 by highlighting the benefits of it compared to IPv4. Although the need for more IP-addresses is the most urgent incentive for the transition to IPv6, other factors also exist. IPv6 offers many improvements to IPv4 which are necessary for the continued expansion of Internet-based applications and services. Some argue that we do not need to transition to IPv6 as the problems with IPv4, mainly the address- shortage, can be solved in other ways. One of the methods of doing this is by extending the use of Network Address Translators (NATs), but the majority of experts and specialists believe that NATs should not be seen as a long-term solution.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT of Ipv6
    INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT OF IPv6 APRIL 2010 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD This report provides an overview of several indicators and data sets for measuring IPv6 deployment. This report was prepared by Ms. Karine Perset of the OECD‟s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) recommended, at its meeting in December 2009, forwarding the document to the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) for declassification. The ICCP Committee agreed to make the document publicly available in March 2010. Experts from the Internet Technical Advisory Committee to the ICCP Committee (ITAC) and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) have provided comments, suggestions, and contributed significantly to the data in this report. Special thanks are to be given to Geoff Huston from APNIC and Leo Vegoda from ICANN on behalf of ITAC/the NRO, Patrick Grossetete from ArchRock, Martin Levy from Hurricane Electric, Google and the IPv6 Forum for providing data, analysis and comments for this report. This report was originally issued under the code DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)17/FINAL. Issued under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD member countries. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016
    IPv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016 Telstra Unrestricted Introduction Sunny Yeung - Senior Technology Specialist, Telstra Wireless Network Engineering Technical Lead for Wireless IPv6 deployment Wireless Mobile IP Edge/Core Architect Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 2 Agenda 1. Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? 2. IPv6 – it’s here. Really. 3. Wireless Network Architectures 4. 464XLAT – Saviour? Or the devil in disguise? 5. Solution Testing and Results 6. Conclusion 7. Q&A Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 3 Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? • Exponential Growth in mobile data traffic and user equipment • Network readiness for Internet-of-Things • IPv4 public address depletion • IPv4 private address depletion • Offload the NAT44 architecture • VoLTE/IMS Remember – IPv6 should be invisible to the end-user Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 5 IPv6 It’s Here. Really. IPv6 Global Traffic The world according to Google Source - https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 7 Carrier Examples SP1 SP2 / SP3 SP4 Dual-Stack SS+NAT64+DNS64+CLAT SS/DS+NAT64+DNS-HD +CLAT 1. Every carrier will have a unique set of circumstances that dictates which transition method they will use. There is no standard way of doing this. 2. You must determine which is the best method for your network. In any method, remember to ensure you have a long-term strategy for the eventual deployment of native Single Stack IPv6! Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 8 IPv4 reality – from a business perspective 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mobile Networks and Ipv6
    Evolution of Mobile Networks and IPv6 Miwa Fujii <[email protected]> APNIC, Senior Advisor Internet Development 25th April 2014 APEC TEL49 Yangzhou, China Issue Date: [25/04/2014] Revision: [3] Overview • Growth path of the Internet – Asia Pacific region • Evolution of mobile networks • IPv6 deployment in mobile networks: Case study • IPv6 deployment status update • IPv6 in mobile networks: way forward 2 Growth path of the Internet The next wave of Internet growth • The Internet has experienced phenomenal growth in the last 20 years – 16 million users in 1995 and 2.8 billion users in 2013 • And the Internet is still growing: Research indicates that by 2017, there will be about 3.6 billion Internet users – Over 40% of the world’s projected population (7.6 billion) • The next wave of Internet growth will have a much larger impact on the fundamental nature of the Internet – It is coming from mobile networks http://www.allaboutmarketresearch.com/internet.htm 4 Internet development in AP region: Internet users 100.00 Internet Users (per 100 inhabitants) New Zealand, 89.51 90.00 Canada, 86.77 Korea, 84.10 Australia, 82.35 80.00 United States, 81.03 Japan, 79.05 Chinese Taipei, 75.99 Singapore, 74.18 70.00 Hong Kong, China, 72.80 Malaysia, 65.80 Chile, 61.42 60.00 Brunei Darussalam, 60.27 Russia, 53.27 50.00 China, 42.30 Viet Nam, 39.49 40.00 Mexico, 38.42 Peru, 38.20 The Philippines, 36.24 30.00 Thailand, 26.50 20.00 Indonesia, 15.36 10.00 Papua New Guinea, 2.30 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 http://statistics.apec.org/ 5 Internet
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of Ipv4 Address Exhaustion
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN FAKULTÄT FÜR ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIK LEHRSTUHL FÜR INTELLIGENTE NETZE UND MANAGEMENT VERTEILTER SYSTEME Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of IPv4 Address Exhaustion vorgelegt von M.Sc. Philipp Richter geboren in Berlin von der Fakultät IV – Elektrotechnik und Informatik der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOKTOR DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN -DR. RER. NAT.- genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Möller, Technische Universität Berlin Gutachterin: Prof. Anja Feldmann, Ph.D., Technische Universität Berlin Gutachter: Prof. Vern Paxson, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley Gutachter: Prof. Steve Uhlig, Ph.D., Queen Mary University of London Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 2. August 2017 Berlin 2017 Abstract IP addresses are essential resources for communication over the Internet. In IP version 4, an address is represented by 32 bits in the IPv4 header; hence there is a finite pool of roughly 4B addresses available. The Internet now faces a fundamental resource scarcity problem: The exhaustion of the available IPv4 address space. In 2011, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) depleted its pool of available IPv4 addresses. IPv4 scarcity is now reality. In the subsequent years, IPv4 address scarcity has started to put substantial economic pressure on the networks that form the Internet. The pools of available IPv4 addresses are mostly depleted and today network operators have to find new ways to satisfy their ongoing demand for IPv4 addresses. Mitigating IPv4 scarcity is not optional, but mandatory: Networks facing address shortage have to take action in order to be able to accommodate additional subscribers and customers. Thus, if not confronted, IPv4 scarcity has the potential to hinder further growth of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on Ipv6 'Understanding the Commercial And
    Fall 08 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Editor Wim Degezelle January 2017 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction & Background ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. About the IGF & BPFs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Scope and Goal of the 2016 BPF ................................................................................................................. 7 2. Why deploy IPv6? ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. The Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Why Adopt IPv6?
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 Deployment – Ipv4 Lifetime Exhaustion Sooner Than Expected?
    IPv6 Deployment – IPv4 lifetime Exhaustion sooner than expected? Tony Hain Cisco Systems - Technical Leader IPv6 Forum Fellow [email protected] Session Number Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Distribution of IPv4 addresses by /8 Central 93 ARIN 23 RIPE NCC 19 APNIC 16 LACNIC 4 AfriNIC 1 Defined 4 Multicast 16 Experimental 16 IANA - Pool 25% remaining 64 0 102030405060708090100 IANA allocated 22 /8’s between Jan. 1, 2004 and Jul. 1, 2005 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 222 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 7 6 5 IANA Allocations to RIR's 4 Raw /8 allocations per month 3 2 1 Presentation_ID 0 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 333 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA IANA Allocations to RIR's Sliding-window 6 month geo-mean scale normalized to current 1 per month 2.50000 2.00000 1.50000 1.00000 0.50000 0.00000 Sep-95 Sep-96 Sep-97 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-00 Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 444 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 2.75 3 2.5 2.25 IANA Allocations to RIR's 1.75 2 Sliding-window 12 month average 1.5 1.25 0.75 1 0.5 0.25 0 Presentation_ID Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6-Only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks Ipv4 As-A-Service
    IPv6-only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks IPv4 as-a-Service LACNIC31 May, 2019 Punta Cana, DO @JordiPalet ([email protected]) - 1 Transition / Co-Existence Techniques • IPv6 has been designed for easing the transition and coexistence with IPv4 • Several strategies have been designed and implemented for coexisting with IPv4 hosts, grouped in three categories: – Dual stack: Simultaneous support for both IPv4 and IPv6 stacks – Tunnels: IPv6 packets encapsulated in IPv4 ones • This has been the commonest choice • Today expect IPv4 packets in IPv6 ones! – Translation: Communication of IPv4-only and IPv6- only. Initially discouraged and only “last resort” (imperfect). Today no other choice! • Expect to use them in combination! - 2 Dual-Stack Approach • When adding IPv6 to a system, do not delete IPv4 – This multi-protocol approach is familiar and well-understood (e.g., for AppleTalk, IPX, etc.) – In the majority of the cases, IPv6 is be bundled with all the OS release, not an extra-cost add-on • Applications (or libraries) choose IP version to use – when initiating, based on DNS response: • if (dest has AAAA record) use IPv6, else use IPv4 – when responding, based on version of initiating packet • This allows indefinite co-existence of IPv4 and IPv6, and gradual app-by-app upgrades to IPv6 usage • A6 record is experimental - 3 Dual-Stack Approach IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 Application Application Application Application TCP/UDP TCP/UDP TCP/UDP IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 IPv6-only stack Dual-stack (IPv4 & IPv6) IPv4-only stack IPv6
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of Ipv6
    Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks NIST Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 December 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Dr. Patrick D. Gallagher, Director GUIDELINES FOR THE SECURE DEPLOYMENT OF IPV6 Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-119 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-119, 188 pages (Dec. 2010) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Ipv4 Markets on Ipv6 Deployment
    Andrew Dul [email protected] The money underlies much of what we do When we push against the economics we are pushing up hill…which is hard Since “the beginning of the Internet” allocations have been based on need Over time this process was formalized into RFCs and later into RIR policies The RIRs saw the need to for allowing transfers of IPv4 addresses after exhaustion Transfer policies were created to allow economics to effect transfers Pros ◦ Allows economic factors to bring IPv4 addresses to the right place in the market place ◦ Increases the economic cost of IPv4 potentially forcing users to consider IPv6 Cons ◦ Potentially delays (or maybe deters) the adoption of IPv6 ◦ Deaggregation creates more routing table entries from larger blocks being “chopped up” to sell or lease Large known transaction from Nortel Bankruptcy to Microsoft in 2011 ◦ 667k IPv4 addresses for $7.5 million USD $11.25 USD per IPv4 address Other small transactions have occurred Address brokers are forming ◦ http://tradeipv4.com/ ◦ http://ipv4ex.com/ ◦ ARIN has a listing service 300,000 RIR Allocations to organizations Thousands 250,000 200,000 LACNIC RIPENCC 150,000 ARIN APNIC 100,000 AfriNIC 50,000 /32 IPv4AddressRIR Assignments and Allocations 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Current demand exceeds 250 million addresses per year $70,000 Billions $60,000 IPv4 Allocations vs. World GDP y = 180693x + 2E+13 $50,000 R² = 0.925 $40,000 y = 0.0007x2 - 6289x + 3E+13 $30,000 R² = 0.9432 $20,000 WorldGDP(CurrentUSD)
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Pilot Governance
    Title: Document Version: Deliverable D4.2 1.0 Cross-Border pilot governance Project Number: Project Acronym: Project Title: 297239 GEN6 Governments ENabled with IPv6 Contractual Delivery Date: Actual Delivery Date: Deliverable Type* - Security**: 31/12/2013 06/01/2014 R – PU * Type: P - Prototype, R - Report, D - Demonstrator, O - Other ** Security Class: PU- Public, PP – Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission), RE – Restricted to a group defined by the consortium (including the Commission), CO – Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission) Responsible and Editor/Author: Organization: Contributing WP: Martin Krengel Citkomm WP4 Authors (organisations): Martin Krengel (Citkomm), Gerold Gruber (Citkomm), Carlos Gómez (MINHAP), Mojca Volk (ULFE), Gabriela Gheorghe (University Luxembourg), Antonio Skarmeta (University Murcia) Abstract: This deliverable presents the governance principles and tools defined to monitor the pilots operation In particular, this deliverable focuses on the pilot for IPv6-readiness for cross-border services. Keywords: IPv6, Governments, monitoring, measurement, pilots, national, cross-border, partners, outcome, impact, governance, ticket system, trend GEN6 Consortium Deliverable D4.2 297239 GEN6 Cross-Border pilot governance Revision History The following table describes the main changes done in this document since its creation. Revision Date Description Author (Organization) v0.1 24-09-2013 Document creation, initial ToC Martin Krengel (Citkomm) V0.2 3-12-2013
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Networking and Embedded Gerontechnologies William D
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling Faculty Publications 2007 High-Speed Networking and Embedded Gerontechnologies William D. Kearns University of South Florida, [email protected] James L. Fozard University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/mhs_facpub Scholar Commons Citation Kearns, William D. and Fozard, James L., "High-Speed Networking and Embedded Gerontechnologies" (2007). Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling Faculty Publications. 59. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/mhs_facpub/59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. R e v i e w High-speed networking and embedded gerontechnologies William D. Kearns PhD Internet2 University Executive Liaison, Department of Aging and Mental Health, Louis De La Parte, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612-3807, USA E: [email protected] James L. Fozard PhD School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida Tampa, FL 33612, USA W.D. Kearns, J.L. Fozard, High-speed networking and embedded gerontechnolo- gies. Gerontechnology 2007; 6(3):135-146. Information and communications technologies (ICT) have undergone extraordinary advances in the past 5 years. Two aspects of these developments are described along with their implications for gerontechnology. First, international high speed Internet networks serving the July 2007, Vol 6, No 3 academic community are reviewed, acknowledging that today’s academic net- works are poised to inform the public’s computer networks of tomorrow.
    [Show full text]