BILINGUAL SPEECH and LANGUAGE EVALUATION Committee of Special Education (CSE)- Triannual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BILINGUAL SPEECH and LANGUAGE EVALUATION Committee of Special Education (CSE)- Triannual BILINGUAL SPEECH AND LANGUAGE EVALUATION Committee of Special Education (CSE)- Triannual Student’s Name: Sue Sylvester Date of Birth: 11/19/2008 Evaluator: Ana M. Santos M.A., CCC-SLP; TSSLD-BE Date of Evaluation: 01/26/2018 Languages: Spanish & English Chronological Age: 9; 2 years School: McKinley School Grade: 3rd District: Glee UFSD Current Procedural Terminology®: 92523 (Evaluation of language comprehension and expression) Purpose of the Current Speech & Language evaluation: The following bilingual speech and language evaluation contains clinical observations of auditory, visual, oral-motor, and cognitive-linguistic status; and standardized and/or non- standardized measures of specific aspects of speech, spoken and non-spoken language, cognitive-linguistic communication, and analysis of current speech and language samples. Sue is a 9;2-year-old female student, who was seen for a bilingual (Spanish/English) speech and language evaluation at her school. She attends McKinley school (Glee district), where she is currently in third grade. This evaluation was requested by her school staff and family, due to concerns regarding her current levels of communication functioning and possible eligibility for speech and language therapy services. The purpose of the information in this report, is to provide documentation to assist the Committee of Special Education (CSE) in determination of eligibility for speech and language therapy services, to address Sue’s current academic deficits. This bilingual Speech and Language Pathologist aimed to identify Sue’s unique speech and language strengths and needs, and determine the areas that may require intervention, by assessing the ability to mechanically form language (to say words and sentences in terms of using the tongue and lips correctly); ability to process language (to understand spoken and printed language and to express oneself verbally and in writing); how well Sue understands the language spoken by others (directions, stories read, teacher lecture, classroom discussion); how well expressive language is used (express needs, thoughts, and ideas verbally); how Sue grasps the underlying structure of language (grammar, vocabulary, word usage, and how words go together to form sentences); how well language is used to meet specific needs and navigate the social world; and whether Sue has acquired the foundation of speech and language skills needed in order to effectively participate, read and write, to perform in curriculum-based tasks in school. Background Information: Relevant Medical & Developmental History- Please refer to the school files for documents available regarding gestation, birth, developmental, language acquisition, and bilingual background information, as well as pertinent information regarding family history of speech/language/learning/hearing impairments, and cultural considerations. Hearing & Vision Skills- Sue does not wear hearing aids, nor corrective lenses, and does not use alternative/augmentative communication devices. During this evaluation, Sue responded to all conversational exchanges and identified all items without visual struggles noted. Cultural Considerations for Assessment: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sue Sylvester (DOB: 11/19/2008- 9;2yo) Bilingual Speech and Language Evaluation 01/26/2018 Basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS) and cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) were assessed during this evaluation in a variety of tasks, to determine language dominance and/or preference in a variety of communication domains. BICS are language skills needed in social situations. It is the day-to-day language needed to interact socially with other people. English language learners (ELLs) employ BIC skills when they are on the playground, in the lunch room, on the school bus, at parties, playing sports and talking on the telephone. These language skills usually develop within six months to two years after arrival in the U.S. CALP refers to formal academic learning. This includes listening, speaking, reading, and writing about subject area content material. This usually takes from five to seven years. Consistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and NYSED guidelines (updated 2014) for bilingual students and English Language Learners such as Sue, test scores should not be reported for students for whom the normative sample is not representative. In this case, qualitative and descriptive information about Sue’ performance on the tasks covered by said test, should take the place of a score. Numeric scores, including age ranges, should not be used as sole measures to establish need for related services, as they are invalid and inaccurate in determination of service eligibility for children like Sue. Test scores are invalid when testing a student who is not reflected in the normative group for the test's standardization sample, even if the test were administered as instructed in the manual. These are only used because they can provide valuable descriptive information about abilities and limitations, in the language of the test. As such, selected subtests and tasks were used during this assessment solely to elicit speech, language- and reading-based tasks. Test modifications were provided as well, allowing Sue extra time for responses; eliminating items that were deemed culturally inappropriate; and using alternatives to standardized scoring, by providing qualitative descriptions of performance instead of scores. Assessment Tools: -Targeted clinical observation of naturalistic interactions and informed clinical opinion -Structured dynamic assessment, conversational exchanges, and language sample analysis -Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals- 5th Edition (CELF-5, 2015) Selected tasks -Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals- 4th Ed. Spanish (CELF-4, 2006) Selected tasks -Oral Passage Understanding Scale (OPUS, 2017) Selected passages -Comprehensive Spoken Language Assessment 2nd Edition (CASL-2, 2017) Selected tasks -Dynamic Assessment of Narrative & Expository Discourse (Gillam, Peña & Miller, 1999) -School Age Language Assessment Measures (LEADERSProject.org) -Use of Standardized Scores in Individual Evaluations of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse English Language Learners Ages 3 through 21 (NYSED, 2014) -New York State P-12 Common Core Learning Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy -American Speech & Hearing Association: Knowledge and Skills Needed by Speech Language Pathologists and Audiologists to Provide Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services -ASHA: Language-Based Learning Disabilities (Reading, Spelling, and Writing) -ASHA: Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Reading ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sue Sylvester (DOB: 11/19/2008- 9;2yo) Bilingual Speech and Language Evaluation 01/26/2018 and Writing in Children and Adolescents -Regulations of the Commissioner of Education (with amendments through April 2015) Clinical Verbal Behavioral Observations & Pragmatic Skills: This evaluation was conducted at Sue’s school, with appropriate lighting and no auditory and/or visual distractions. The conditions for assessment were somewhat optimal and Sue was presented with clean, age-appropriate and culturally adapted assessment materials. Sue transitioned well into the evaluation setting and responded to greetings. She presented as a well-related and friendly student whom exhibited pragmatic skills (social abilities) typical of a student with her profile to maintain engagements, initiate topics of conversation, maintain most topics of conversations, ask questions, and request clarification, without impairments noted. Her eye contact was overall adequate, and she often smiled. She maintained focus and attention on all tasks presented and finished all tasks without need for cues or verbal prompts. Language Assessment: Receptive Language Skills- At the time of this assessment, Sue’s receptive language skills appear to be developing within academic expectations. Receptively, Sue followed all multi-step directives without cues in both Spanish and English. She performed well when instructions contained inclusions/exclusions, locations, sequences, conditions, noun modifiers, and temporal concepts. Sue responded to all WH questions. She labeled items (What); stated quantities (How Many); identified locations (Where); identified subjects (Who); determined possession (Whose); distinguished temporal cues (When); responded to Yes/No questions; and responded to questions involving reasoning (Why); inferencing (What if); sequencing (How); and stating details. She stated items when categories were provided (i.e., foods, animals, shapes); stated the category when the items were provided (i.e., banana, apple, orange); stated object use (i.e., what do we do with soap? What do we do with a bed?) and stated items based on adjectives (i.e., what is a red round toy that bounces) or as related based on semantic features, such as: [running/jumping]: “because they both are things I can do- it’s an action word”; [books/library]: “because you can find books inside the library”; [candle/wax]: “you use wax to make a candle”; [minute/hour]: “an hour is sixty minutes”; [north/west]: “they’re both a direction”/ She provided multiple definitions for a variety of concepts without assistance: [cold]: “freezing- like the opposite of warm- and a sickness” [mouse]: “rat
Recommended publications
  • Queer Identities and Glee
    IDENTITY AND SOLIDARITY IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES: QUEER IDENITIES AND GLEE Katie M. Buckley A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music August 2014 Committee: Katherine Meizel, Advisor Kara Attrep Megan Rancier © 2014 Katie Buckley All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katherine Meizel, Advisor Glee, a popular FOX television show that began airing in 2009, has continuously pushed the limits of what is acceptable on American television. This musical comedy, focusing on a high school glee club, incorporates numerous stereotypes and real-world teenage struggles. This thesis focuses on the queer characteristics of four female personalities: Santana, Brittany, Coach Beiste, and Coach Sue. I investigate how their musical performances are producing a constructive form of mass media by challenging hegemonic femininity through camp and by producing relatable queer female role models. In addition, I take an ethnographic approach by examining online fan blogs from the host site Tumblr. By reading the blogs as a digital archive and interviewing the bloggers, I show the positive and negative effects of an online community and the impact this show has had on queer girls, allies, and their worldviews. iv This work is dedicated to any queer human being who ever felt alone as a teenager. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my teacher and advisor, Dr. Meizel, for all of her support through the writing of this thesis and for always asking the right questions to keep me thinking. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Glee, Flash Mobs, and the Creation of Heightened Realities
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction University Libraries Publications and Scholarship University Libraries 9-20-2016 Glee, Flash Mobs, and the Creation of Heightened Realities Elizabeth Downey Mississippi State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ul-publications Recommended Citation Downey, Elizabeth M. "Glee, Flash Mobs, and the Creation of Heightened Realities." Journal of Popular Film & Television, vol. 44, no. 3, Jul-Sep2016, pp. 128-138. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/ 01956051.2016.1142419. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Libraries Publications and Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Glee and Flash Mobs 1 Glee, Flash Mobs, and the Creation of Heightened Realities In May of 2009 the television series Glee (Fox, 2009-2015) made its debut on the Fox network, in the coveted post-American Idol (2002-present) timeslot. Glee was already facing an uphill battle due to its musical theatre genre; the few attempts at a musical television series in the medium’s history, Cop Rock (ABC, 1990) and Viva Laughlin (CBS, 2007) among them, had been overall failures. Yet Glee managed to defeat the odds, earning high ratings in its first two seasons and lasting a total of six. Critics early on attributed Glee’s success to the popularity of the Disney Channel’s television movie High School Musical (2006) and its subsequent sequels, concerts and soundtracks. That alone cannot account for the long-term sensation that Glee became, when one acknowledges that High School Musical was a stand-alone movie (sequels notwithstanding).
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Youth Talk Around Representations of Individual Difference in the American Television Show Glee
    An Exploration of Youth Talk Around Representations of Individual Difference in the American Television Show Glee The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Dorsey, Jennifer M. 2016. An Exploration of Youth Talk Around Representations of Individual Difference in the American Television Show Glee. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27112712 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA ! An Exploration of Youth Talk Around Representations of Individual Difference in the American Television Show Glee Jennifer Dorsey Helen Haste Joseph Blatt Jal Mehta A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education of Harvard University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education 2016 ! ""!! ! ! 2016 Jennifer Dorsey All Rights Reserved ! """!! ! Abstract In this study I investigate the ways in which youth talk about difference and fictional television characters in order to better understand youth's relationship with the media and diverse others. I use the theoretical framework of constructivism and the analytic framework of Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in order to answer the following research questions: 1) What
    [Show full text]
  • Closeted Channels: Trends of Sexual-Minority
    Closeted Channels: Trends of Sexual-Minority Characters on Primetime Television ____________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Honors Tutorial College with the degree of Bachelors of Science in Communications ____________________________________________ Andrew W Kellogg Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Homosexuality in the 1980s - Exception, Provocation, and AIDS …………………………..7 Chapter 2: Gay Sexuality and Gay Politics in the 1990s ……………………………………………….22 Chapter 3: Sexual Orientation and Sexual Fluidity in Grey’s Anatomy and Orange is the New Black ..36 Chapter 4: Gender Identification and Masculine and Feminine Gays in Glee …………………………….53 Chapter 5: Modern Family and Homosexual Family Roles ……………………………………………65 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………...75 Bibliography .…………………………………………………………………………………………...85 1 Introduction Broadcast television wields a tremendous amount of power in America. The amount of time that an average American sits in front of a screen is staggering. For 2013, Nielsen reported that Americans watch an average of 34 hours of live TV a week and an additional 3 to 4 hours of streamed or home-recorded programming. The average time that an American youth spends in school is 900 hours a year; the average time that an American youth spends in front of television screen a year is 1200 hours. As young adults develop their ideas about cultural and social norms, they turn to television, whose implicit and explicit messages eventually become internalized after so many hours of exposure. Weststrate and McLean point to mainstream, popular narrative as a tool that young adults use to develop their own personal narratives. Those who can find their voice identify with a position of cultural power.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing with Myself: Representations of Disability Within Glee
    DANCING WITH MYSELF: REPRESENTATIONS OF DISABILITY WITHIN GLEE By Lauren Levins A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mass Communication Middle Tennessee State University 2013 Thesis Committee: Dr. Katie Foss, Chair Dr. Jason Reineke Dr. Clare Bratten ABSTRACT: Media have potential to alter people’s perceptions towards unfamiliar subjects (Davis, 2006). In the case of disability, danger can occur when representations are inaccurate. Previous research on portrayals of disabilities found a lack of representation and negative depictions overall. This study looked at the first three seasons of the television show Glee. Textual analysis was applied using Hall’s Encoding/Decoding, Dyer’s stereotyping, social construction theory, and a developed list of stereotypes. This study attempted to answer how people with disabilities were constructed and the perpetuation or challenging of stereotypes on Glee. Resulting topics involved storylines used to depict disabilities, interactions, and disability and agency. Stereotypes were found, but serious topics were also discussed. Implications involve the importance of accurate portrayals, the possibility to learn about disabilities, and the risks of self-stigmatization and negative treatment of disabilities. Further analysis of Glee seasons and comparisons of Glee’s depictions to other shows were suggested. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...1 Defining Disability………………………………………………………………………4 History of Portrayals……………………………………………………………………..4
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Newell Talks New Music & Future Husband Material
    ENTERTAINMENTTELEVISION Alex Newell Talks New Music & Future Husband Material Returning this week as Unique on Glee, the actor and musician says he has a soft spot for Sam Smith and would love to be on the set of Empire BY RAE VOTTA FEBRUARY 12 2015 11:10 AM EST Alex Newell at the Trevor Project Live event in Los Angeles in Dec. 2014 | Credit: Getty Before Shannon (now Sheldon) Beiste came out on Glee’s sixth season, Alex Newell played the show’s first trans-identifying character, Unique. After making waves with a powerhouse voice on the show’s feeder reality series The Glee Project, Newell won a two-episode arc on Glee that he transitioned into a recurring role in the series’ fourth season. While he was part of the jettisoned newbies moving into the final season, Newell has kept busy working on his own album and bringing the house down at countless live events across the country. But he couldn't stay away from Glee forever. Newell makes his return to McKinley in Friday’s episode and let us know what’s up with his original music, and talks whom of his fellow 100 Eligible Bachelor nominees could be his future husband, and why. Unique’s back on Glee! What’s going on in her world? She’s coming back and shedding the light and being the backbone she’s always been. She’s the, “It’s OK to be who you are” kind of person. I think this role has taught me it’s fine to be myself regardless of what I wear or how I speak.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices Realized Detail
    26662 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302 Tel: 310.859.7701 Fax: 310.859.3842 PRICES REALIZED DETAIL - Glee: The Official Show Auction Part II Auction 85, Auction Date: 3/11/2016 LOT ITEM PRICE PREMIUM 1 KURT HUMMEL (PLAYED BY CHRIS COLFER) BLACK POLO & CONVERSE $175 $35 ENSEMBLE FOM "VITAMIN D". 2 SEASON 1 LITTLE RACHEL BERRY “FLASHBACK” BALLERINA & TAP SHOE $100 $20 COSTUME ENSEMBLE. 3 MERCEDES JONES (PLAYED BY AMBER RILEY) "GLEE CLUB" AUDITION $125 $25 COSTUME FROM THE SERIES PILOT. 8 WILL AND TERRI SHUESTER (PLAYED BY MATTHEW MORRISON AND JESSALYN $200 $40 GILSIG) AMERICAN GOTHIC PUZZLE FROM THE EPISODE "PILOT". 10 WILL SCHUESTER (PLAYED BY MATTHEW MORRISON) COLLECTION OF (3) $125 $25 COSTUMES. 12 TINA COHEN-CHANG (PLAYED BY JENNA USHKOWITZ) “KILL CITY” COSTUME $100 $20 ENSEMBLE. 13 QUINN FABRAY (PLAYED BY DIANNA AGRON) “MERONA” DRESS FROM $500 $100 “SECTIONALS”. 14 TERRI SHUESTER (PLAYED BY JESSALYN GILSIG) “DECONGESTANT D” (50+) $100 $20 PROP BOX LOT. 15 SANTANA LOPEZ (PLAYED BY NAYA RIVERA) ENSEMBLE FROM “SILLY LOVE $100 $20 SONGS”. 18 KURT HUMMEL (PLAYED BY CHRIS COLFER) SEASON 1 COSTUME $150 $30 COLLECTION. 19 HOWARD BAMBOO (PLAYED BY KENT AVENIDO) SHEETS N THINGS UNIFORM $100 $20 ENSEMBLE. 21 BRITTANY (PLAYED BY HEATHER MORRIS) SEASON 1 PHOTO COLLECTION & $375 $75 KEY CHARACTER PROP LOT. 22 SUGAR MOTTA (PLAYED BY VANESSA LENGIES) SPAGHETTI STRAP DRESS $150 $30 ENSEMBLE FROM "I AM UNICORN". 23 RACHEL BERRY (PLAYED BY LEA MICHELE) FLORAL & DENIM ENSEMBLE FROM $200 $40 “RUMOURS”. 24 APRIL RHODES (PLAYED BY KRISTIN CHENOWETH) COSTUME FROM $150 $30 “PREGGERS”. 25 SHELBY CORCORAN (PLAYED BY IDINA MENZEL) "DIANE VON FURSTENBERG" $150 $30 DRESS.
    [Show full text]
  • Transing the Small Screen: Loving and Hating Transgender Youth in Glee and Degrassi
    Transing the small screen: loving and hating transgender youth in Glee and Degrassi Citation of the final chapter: Sandercock, Thomas 2017, Transing the small screen: loving and hating transgender youth in Glee and Degrassi. In Luyt, Russell, Welch, Christina and Lobban, Rosemary (ed), Diversity in gender and visual representation, Routledge, Basingstoke, Eng. This is the accepted manuscript of a chapter published by Routledge in Diversity in gender and visual representation in 2017, available at: https://www.routledge.com/Diversity-in-Gender-and- Visual-Representation-1st-Edition/Luyt-Welch-Lobban/p/book/9780367230883 ©2017, Taylor & Francis Downloaded from DRO: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30093731 DRO Deakin Research Online, Deakin University’s Research Repository Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B Transing the small screen: loving and hating transgender youth in Glee and Degrassi Tom Sandercock* School of Communication & Creative Arts, Deakin University Abstract The teen television shows Glee (2009-) and Degrassi (2001-) are notable for diversity in gender and sexuality representations. Glee represents a variety of masculine women and feminine men as well as gay, lesbian, and bisexual characters. Likewise, Canada’s Degrassi franchise has portrayed non-heterosexual characters in significant and controversial ways. Its most recent incarnation, Degrassi (previously Degrassi: The Next Generation) is discussed in this article, alongside Glee, in relation to their recent inclusions of two transgender-identified teenagers bringing transgenderism to the fore of these programmes’ discussions of gender and identity. As trans youth are highly vulnerable due to both systemic ageism and cisgenderism, it is not surprising that both detail narratives of discrimination and assault driven by bigotry and ignorance.
    [Show full text]
  • Whereweareontv 2012 - 2013 Season
    WHEREWEAREONTV 2012 - 2013 SEASON words and images matter WHEREWEAREONTV 2012-2013 1 WHEREWEAREONTV 2012 - 2013 SEASON 3 OVERVIEW 7 DRAMA SERIES 8 COMEDY SERIES 9 CABLE PROGRAMMING 11 SEX AND GENDER 13 RACE AND ETHNICITY 15 PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 16 REALITY PROGRAMMING 17 DAYTIME TELEVISION 17 SPANISH-LANGUAGE MEDIA 18 FIVE YEAR TRENDS 20 glaad’s ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA TEAM WHEREWEAREONTV 2012-2013 2 WHEREWEAREONTV 2012-2013 2 WHEREWEAREONTV 2012 - 2013 SEASON This year, glaad has recorded the highest ever percentage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) characters expected to appear on scripted primetime broadcast television in the coming year. The annual Where We Are on TV report forecasts the expected presence of LGBT characters for the upcoming 2012-2013 television season. THE NEW NORMAL’S JUSTIN BARTHA ‘DAVID MURRAY’ AND ANDREW RANNELLS ‘BRYAN COLLINS,’ NBC Following a slight decrease last season, presence of LGBT characters and the visibility of the community the analysis of characters for the 2012-2013 television schedule they portray on television in upcoming scripted primetime found that 4.4% of series regulars will be lesbian, gay, bisexual programs; both new and returning shows. The creation of the or transgender characters. This is up from 2.9% in 2011, 3.9% Where We Are on TV report in 2005 has allowed GLAAD to in 2010, 3% in 2009, 2.6% in 2008 and 1.1% in 2007. LGBT track trends and compile statistics for series regular characters characters on scripted cable television also rose this year with an on broadcast television with regard to sexual orientation, gender additional six regular characters from last year’s count, making identity and race/ethnicity for the upcoming season.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox's “Glee” Portrays Homosexuality Honestly
    Interested in writing TV, music, movie, concert, restaurant, book reviews and more? Write for the Lifestyles section! For more information, e-mail /LIHVW\OHV [email protected]. Fox’s “Glee” Portrays Homosexuality Honestly Hit show “Glee” does SDUW EXW KH ZDV WRR LQWULJXHG ZLWKKLPWRMXVWOHWKLPJR away with stereotypes of 0XUSK\VFUDSSHGWKHSODQQHG homosexuals FKDUDFWHU5DMLVKDQGZURWHLQWKH QHZFKDUDFWHU.XUW+XPPHO By Ryan O’Callaghan ³*OHH´ SURYLGHV DQ KRQHVW Sta! Writer SRUWUD\DO RI LWV JD\ FKDUDFWHUV 7KRXJK.XUWGRHVIDOOLQWRVRPH RI WKH VWHUHRW\SHV KLV FKDUDFWHU :KHQ5\DQ0XUSK\FRFUH DYRLGVWKHFRRNLHFXWWHUJD\FKDU DWRURI³*OHH´SLWFKHGWKHLGHDIRU DFWHUWKDWKDVSRSSHGLQDQGRXW KLV QHZ VKRZ WR )R[ KH FDOOHG RI79VKRZVIRU\HDUV ³*OHH´ D VKRZ DERXW ³ZK\ WKH .XUWOHDUQVIURPKLVWLPHZLWK DUWVPDWWHUDQGZK\WKHDUWVFDQ WKH*OHH&OXEKRZWREHKLPVHOI FKDQJH\RXUOLIH´ DQGHPEUDFHEHLQJXQLTXH /LWWOHGLGKHNQRZWKDWFRQ +H FRPHV RXW WR KLV IDWKHU FHSWZRXOGVN\URFNHWLQWRDJORE ZKRXQOLNHPDQ\SDVWFKDUDFWHUV DOVHQVDWLRQ DFFHSWVKLVVRQDQGGRHVQRWKROG ³*OHH´ KDV EHHQ QRPLQDWHG DJUXGJH IRURYHURQHKXQGUHGDZDUGVDQG 2QO\ D VRSKRPRUH .XUW KDVZRQRYHU¿IW\LQFOXGLQJIRXU HQGVXSEHLQJRSHQO\JD\LQKLV (PP\ ZLQV RXW RI QLQH 2KLR KLJK VFKRRO $OWKRXJK KH WHHQQRPLQDWLRQV DQGWKUHH JHWVEXOOLHGKHNHHSVKLVKHDGXS *ROGHQ*OREHZLQV KLJK 'HVSLWHDOORIWKHDFFRODGHV &ROIHU¶V SUHVHQFH LQ ³*OHH´ photo provided by gleehab.com ZKDW VKRFNHG WKH FUHDWRUV PRVW PDGH RWKHU SORW OLQHV SRVVLEOH ZDVWKHRXWUHDFKWRWKHVWRU\OLQH OLNHWKHDGGLWLRQRIWKHFKDUDFWHUV Dave Karkofsky (Max Adler) bullies Kurt Hummel (Chris Colfer) in a dramatic
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Issues Through Transgender Character in Glee Tv Series
    TRANSGENDER ISSUES THROUGH TRANSGENDER CHARACTER IN GLEE TV SERIES A Thesis Submitted to Faculty of Adab and Humanities In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1) FARA KURNIA PRAMESTI 11140260000057 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF ADAB AND HUMANITIES STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2019 ABSTRACT Fara Kurnia Pramesti, Transgender Issues through Transgender Character in GLEE TV Series. A Thesis: English Letters Department, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019. This Research aims to know the representation of transgender issues of transgender character named Wade Adams from Glee TV series. This research explained Wade’s transgender issues that has been reflected from the show. The writer uses qualitative descriptive analysis method to reveal the findings. All data are collected from the scenes, action, and dialogues from eight episodes of Glee. The writer finds that Wade is a transwoman character who transforms himself from a man to be a woman. Wade is seen more confident by being a woman. He also often says that he is a black woman. Wade always embraces his femininity by wearing dress, high heels, wig, fancy jewelry and make-up. However, Wade faces few transgender issues such as self-identity which he identifies himself as a black woman and find a new name for himself which he wanted people called him “Unique”, violence, discrimination from institution that made him got banned from school play, discrimination in public facilities that make him cannot choose the right bathroom for him, and discrimination in environment which made him scared to walk on the street alone.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Sue Sylvester, Coach Beiste, Santana Lopez, and Unique Adams
    KATHRYN HOBSON 7. SUE SYLVESTER, COACH BEISTE, SANTANA LOPEZ, AND UNIQUE ADAMS Exploring Queer Representations of Femininity on Glee The first episode of Glee first aired May 19, 2009 to an audience of 9,619 viewers (Seidman, 2009). With varying storylines concerning contemporary social issues such as bullying, characters coming out as gay and lesbian, characters dealing with the recession and poverty, and characters experiencing material realities of racial and ethnic differences, Glee has been touted as anti-Christian (Gibbs, 2009) and promoting the “homosexual agenda” (“Victoria Jackson,” 2011) by conservative individuals and political organizations. While the treatment of these controversial topics has been lauded by few, and considered problematic by several (Samtori, 2012), the idea that some representation is better than no representation appeals to many of us who never feel that we are reflected in the media (Samtori, 2012). These few examples of plot lines on Glee challenge the archetypal high school dramedy with the carefully defined jocks, nerds, divas, and rich kids; blurring the lines between these categories of difference. For example, Finn Hudson (Cory Monteith), Noah Puckerman, and Quinn Fabray (Dianna Aragon) are all popular members of the football team or the Cheerios cheerleading squad and also glee club geeks. Glee works to challenge dichotomies of identities, instead relying more on a post-racial (Dubrofsky, 2013), post-feminist take on multicultural issues; opting to satirize, and at times mock the real complexities
    [Show full text]