DOCSLIB.ORG

A Solution to Darwin's Dilemma: Differential Taphonomy of Ediacaran and Palaeozoic Non-Mineralised Discoidal Fossils

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Solution to Darwin's Dilemma: Differential Taphonomy of Ediacaran and Palaeozoic Non-Mineralised Discoidal Fossils Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title A Solution to Darwin's Dilemma: Differential Taphonomy of Ediacaran and Palaeozoic Non-Mineralised Discoidal Fossils Author(s) MacGabhann, Breandán Anraoi Publication Date 2012-08-29 Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/3406 Downloaded 2021-09-26T20:57:04Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. A Solution to Darwin’s Dilemma: Differential taphonomy of Palaeozoic and Ediacaran non- mineralised discoidal fossils Volume 1 of 2 Breandán Anraoi MacGabhann Supervisor: Dr. John Murray Earth and Ocean Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, NUI Galway August 2012 Differential taphonomy of Palaeozoic and Ediacaran non-mineralised fossils Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ........................................................................................................... xxi Taxonomic Statement ........................................................................................... xxiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ xxv Abstract ................................................................................................................. xxix 1. Darwin’s Dilemma ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The non-mineralised fossils of the Ediacaran System ................................ 6 1.2 ‘Death Masks’ & ‘Gravity Casts’: preservation of the Precambrian fossils 11 1.3 Closure of a taphonomic window, or a mass extinction? .......................... 14 1.4 Exceptional preservation of non-mineralised fossils in the Phanerozoic .. 16 1.5 The Tafilalt Konservat Lagerstätte .......................................................... 18 1.6 Scope and aim of this project ................................................................... 18 1.7 Thesis plan ............................................................................................... 20 2. Analytical methods .............................................................................................. 21 2.1 Visual techniques and photography ......................................................... 22 2.2 Microscopy .............................................................................................. 25 2.2.1 SEM-EDS ......................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 Laser Raman ...................................................................................... 26 2.3 Geochemical techniques .......................................................................... 27 2.3.1 XRD .................................................................................................. 27 2.3.2 XRF ................................................................................................... 28 2.3.3 ICP-MS ............................................................................................. 28 3. Geological Context of Fossil Localities ............................................................... 31 3.1 Field locations .......................................................................................... 31 iii Breandán Anraoi MacGabhann 3.1.1 Morocco ............................................................................................. 31 3.1.1.1 Localities ..................................................................................... 34 M001 ........................................................................................................ 34 M003 ........................................................................................................ 38 M005 ........................................................................................................ 40 M008 ........................................................................................................ 45 M009 ........................................................................................................ 47 M010 ........................................................................................................ 47 M012 ........................................................................................................ 48 M020 ........................................................................................................ 49 3.1.2 United States of America ................................................................... 49 3.2 Geological context of additional fossil material ........................................ 50 3.2.1 United States of America ................................................................... 51 3.2.2 Australia ............................................................................................. 54 3.2.3 England .............................................................................................. 57 3.2.4 Ireland ................................................................................................ 57 3.2.5 Canada ............................................................................................... 59 4. The Class Eldoniata ............................................................................................. 63 4.1 Systematic Palaeontology ......................................................................... 66 Unranked stem-group CAMBROERNIDS Caron et al., 2010 ............................. 66 Class ELDONIATA class nov. ............................................................................ 66 Order ELDONIDA ord. nov. ............................................................................. 67 Family ELDONIIDAE Walcott, 1911 ................................................................ 68 Genus ELDONIA Walcott, 1911 ...................................................................... 68 ELDONIA LUDWIGI Walcott, 1911 .................................................................. 69 ELDONIA EUMORPHA (Sun and Hou, 1987) ................................................... 81 Family MAOYANIDISCIDAE nom. nov. ............................................................ 83 iv Differential taphonomy of Palaeozoic and Ediacaran non-mineralised fossils Genus MAOYANIDISCUS nom. nov. ................................................................ 84 MAOYANIDISCUS GRANDIS (Sun and Hou, 1987) .......................................... 85 MAOYANIDISCUS SP. ....................................................................................... 86 Genus PARAROTADISCUS Zhu, Zhao and Chen, 2002 .................................. 87 PARAROTADISCUS GUIZHOUENSIS (Zhao and Zhu, 1994) ............................. 88 ? Family MAOYANIDISCIDAE .......................................................................... 89 Genus VELUMBRELLA Stasińska, 1960 ........................................................... 89 VELUMBRELLA CZARNOCKII Stasińska, 1960 ................................................ 90 Genus SEPUTUS MacGabhann and Murray, 2010 .......................................... 91 SEPUTUS POMEROII MacGabhann and Murray, 2010 .................................... 91 Family PAROPSONEMIDAE fam. nov. .............................................................. 94 Genus PAROPSONEMA Clarke, 1900 .............................................................. 95 PAROPSONEMA CRYTOPHYA Clarke, 1900 ..................................................... 95 PAROPSONEMA MIRABILE (Chapman, 1926a) .............................................. 105 Genus PRAECLARUS gen. nov. ...................................................................... 110 PRAECLARUS VANROII sp. nov. ..................................................................... 111 PRAECLARUS SP. ........................................................................................... 117 Genus DISCOPHYLLUM Hall, 1847 .............................................................. 121 DISCOPHYLLUM PELTATUM Hall, 1847 ....................................................... 122 4.2 Other potential eldonides ...................................................................... 145 4.2.1 Eomedusa datsenkoi ........................................................................... 145 4.2.2 Sinoflabrum antiquum Zhang and Babcock, 2001 ............................ 146 4.2.3 ‘Trace fossils’ from Algeria ............................................................... 146 4.2.4 Astropolichnus hispanicus Crimes et al., 1977 ..................................... 147 4.3 General remarks ..................................................................................... 148 4.3.1 Eldonide phylogeny ......................................................................... 148 4.3.2 Palaeoenvironmental tolerance of the eldonides .............................. 151 v Breandán Anraoi MacGabhann 4.3.3 Stratigraphic range of the eldonides ................................................. 151 5. Taphonomy ........................................................................................................ 153 5.1 Taphonomy of the Burgess Shale and Eldonia ludwigi ........................... 160 5.1.1 Previous Research ............................................................................. 160 5.1.2 Taphonomy of Eldonia ludwigi from the Burgess Shale ................... 167 5.2 Taphonomy of the Tafilalt paropsonemids
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ediacaran Frondose Fossil Arborea from the Shibantan Limestone of South China
    Journal of Paleontology, 94(6), 2020, p. 1034–1050 Copyright © 2020, The Paleontological Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 0022-3360/20/1937-2337 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2020.43 The Ediacaran frondose fossil Arborea from the Shibantan limestone of South China Xiaopeng Wang,1,3 Ke Pang,1,4* Zhe Chen,1,4* Bin Wan,1,4 Shuhai Xiao,2 Chuanming Zhou,1,4 and Xunlai Yuan1,4,5 1State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Palaeoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> 2Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA <[email protected]> 3University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 5Center for Research and Education on Biological Evolution and Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China Abstract.—Bituminous limestone of the Ediacaran Shibantan Member of the Dengying Formation (551–539 Ma) in the Yangtze Gorges area contains a rare carbonate-hosted Ediacara-type macrofossil assemblage. This assemblage is domi- nated by the tubular fossil Wutubus Chen et al., 2014 and discoidal fossils, e.g., Hiemalora Fedonkin, 1982 and Aspidella Billings, 1872, but frondose organisms such as Charnia Ford, 1958, Rangea Gürich, 1929, and Arborea Glaessner and Wade, 1966 are also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Permian Brachiopods from Setamai, the Type Locality of The
    Sci. Rep., Niigata Univ., Ser. E(Geology), No. 16, 1-33, 2001 Middle Permian brachiopods from Setamai,the type locality of the Kanokura Formation,southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan Jun-ichi TAZAWA* and Yosuke IBARAKI** Abstract A Middle Permian (Kubergandian-Murgabian) brachiopod fauna is described from the type section of the lower Kanokura Formation in the Setamai area, southern Kitakami Moun tains, northeast Japan. This fauna contains the following nine species: Transennatia gratiosa, Tyloplecta cf. yangzeensis, Waagenoconcha sp., Linoproductus cora, Cancrinella sp., Leptodus nobilis, Derbyia grandis, Derbyia nipponica and Spiriferella keilhavii. The Setamai fauna is characterized by the mixuture of both the Boreal and Tethyan elements. Key words: Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna, brachiopods. Middle Permian, Setamai, southern Kitakami Mountains. Introduction The Permian brachiopod specimens described in this paper were collected by the authors and late Prof. M. Minato of Hokkaido University from nine localities in the Kanokurasawa and Kacchizawa valleys in the Setamai area, the type locahty of the lower part of the Kanokura Formation, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan (Figs. 1,2). The Middle Permian Kanokura Formation was named by Onuki (1937) as the Kanokura Stage, but Onuki (1956)later changed the name to 'formation' with the outcrops along the Kanokurasawa valley as its type section. The stratigraphy of the Kanokura Formation in the Setamai area was described and discussed in detail by Minato et al.(1954,1978,1979), Onuki (1956, 1969), Murata (1964), Saito (1966, 1968) and Choi (1973, 1976). In palaeontology, many species of fusulinaceans (Choi, 1973), corals (Minato, 1955; Minato and Kato, 1965), brachiopods (Hayasaka, 1953; Hayasaka and Minato, 1956; Minato and Nakamura, 1956; * Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan ** Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan (Manuscript received 24 November, 2(XX); accepted 21 December, 2000) J.
    [Show full text]
  • Caswell Et Al. 2019 Preprint Part1
    © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 1 An ecological status indicator for all time: Are AMBI and 2 M-AMBI effective indicators of change in deep time? 3 4 Bryony A. Caswell*1, 2, Chris L. J. Frid3, Angel Borja4 5 6 1Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, 7 Queensland 4222, Australia. 8 2School of Environmental Science, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK 9 3School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, 10 Australia. 11 4AZTI, Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia Portualdea s/n, 20100 Pasaia, Spain 12 13 *Corresponding author: email; Phone: +44(0)1482466341 14 15 Abstract 16 17 Increasingly environmental management seeks to limit the impacts of human 18 activities on ecosystems relative to some ‘reference’ condition, which is often the 19 presumed pre-impacted state, however such information is limited. We explore how 20 marine ecosystems in deep time (Late Jurassic)are characterised by AZTI’s Marine 21 Biotic Index (AMBI), and how the indices responded to natural perturbations. AMBI 22 is widely used to detect the impacts of human disturbance and to establish 23 management targets, and this study is the first application of these indices to a fossil 24 fauna. Our results show AMBI detected changes in past seafloor communities (well- 25 preserved fossil deposits) that underwent regional deoxygenation in a manner 26 analogous to those experiencing two decades of organic pollution. These findings 27 highlight the potential for palaeoecological data to contribute to reconstructions of 28 pre-human marine ecosystems, and hence provide information to policy makers and 29 regulators with greater temporal context on the nature of ‘pristine’ marine 30 ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Earth & Planetary Sciences News
    YALE EARTH & PLANETARY SCIENCES NEWS Yale University I Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences FALL NEWSLETTER 2020 Since our last newsletter (in Chair’s Letter 2018) we have added two new faculty, Assistant Profes- sors Juan Lora and Lidya Dear Friends, Family and Tarhan. Juan studies plan- Alumni of Yale Earth etary atmospheres and & Planetary Sciences, climates, and is one of the principal investigators on the Surely one of the first upcoming NASA Dragonfly things you’ll notice, espe- Mission to the Saturnian moon cially you alumni, is that Juan Lora, Assistant Titan. Titan is one of the big- the department changed Professor gest moons in our solar sys- its name. On July 1, 2020 tem, is the only one with a thick atmosphere made the department went from of mostly nitrogen, and has a methane cycle similar Geology & Geophysics to Earth’s hydrological cycle, which carries water to Earth & Planetary Sci- and heat around our planet. Juan also examines Dave Bercovici ences. This change has how a warming climate on Earth affects water been brewing for decades, transport through atmospheric rivers. through many cycles of discussions, polls, and debates, and was finally Lidya Tarhan works on made official this year. This is not the first time ancient environments, and the department’s name has changed. Yale is one especially how the earliest of the first educational institutions in the country animal life, at and before the to teach the science of the Earth, starting in 1804 time of the Cambrian explo- with a single faculty member, Benjamin Silliman, as sion 540 million years ago, professor of Chemistry and Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW METAZOAN from the MIDDLE CAMBRIAN of UTAH and the NATURE of the VETULICOLIA by DEREK E
    [Palaeontology, Vol. 48, Part 4, 2005, pp. 681–686] RAPID COMMUNICATION A NEW METAZOAN FROM THE MIDDLE CAMBRIAN OF UTAH AND THE NATURE OF THE VETULICOLIA by DEREK E. G. BRIGGS*, BRUCES.LIEBERMAN , SUSAN L. HALGEDAHLà and RICHARD D. JARRARDà *Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, 120 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA àDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, 135 S. 1460 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Typescript received 22 November 2004; accepted in revised form 24 March 2005 Abstract: A new metazoan, Skeemella clavula gen. et sp. arthropodan in character. The similarity of this fossil nov., is described from the Middle Cambrian Pierson Cove to vetulicolians throws hypotheses of their deuterostome Formation of the Drum Mountains, Utah, USA. Skeemella affinity into question and highlights their problematic sta- is similar to vetulicolians, but differs from other examples tus. of this group in the relative proportions of the anterior and posterior sections, the large number of divisions, and Key words: vetulicolian, Cambrian, deuterostome, arthro- the elongate bifid termination. The posterior section is pod. The very name vetulicolian conjures up creatures from species Banffia confusa, to erect a new class of stem-group another planet. These extraordinary fossils, with a head arthropods, the Vetulicolida. They argued that Banffia shield-like anterior and narrow segmented trunk-like pos- constricta from the Burgess Shale belongs to the same terior, are the latest Cambrian group to be accorded phy- class, extending its range to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry Whittington Dies 94
    Published: 5:58PM BST 08 Aug 2010 Professor Harry Whittington Professor Harry Whittington, who died on June 20 aged 94, was the former Woodwardian Professor of Geology at Cambridge and the world’s leading authority on fossil trilobites; in later life he led painstaking research which revealed a “Cambrian explosion” and raised disturbing questions about the proCesses of evolution. Trilobites were hard-carapaced creatures, which thrived, in the Cambrian period, beginning 542 million years ago, until they died out nearly 300 million years later. Very distantly related to horseshoe crabs, they lived in the sea and crawled on land, evolving into more than 20,000 different species, ranging in size from a millimetre to nearly two feet. Many known species are ones which Whittington himself discovered on field trips around the world. Usually it is difficult to extract the fossils from the surrounding rock, but in the 1940s Whittington and his colleague Bill Evitt investigated beds in Virginia where the carapaces of the animals had been replaced by insoluble silica. By throwing samples into acid, they were able to recover thousands of perfect specimens, ranging from fully-grown adults to microscopic larvae. These fossils enabled Whittington, in a series of monographs published in the 1950s and 1960s, to revolutionize what we know about trilobites — how they grew from larva to maturity through successive molts, how they moved and articulated their bodies, and how they evolved and migrated. Later in his career, in 1966, Whittington was invited by the Canadian Geological Society to chair a group commissioned to examine the Burgess Shale deposits discovered by CD Walcott during the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Geological Survey Geological Fieldwork 1990
    GEOLOGY OF THE MOUNT BRUSSILOF MAGNESITE DEPOSIT, SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA (825/12, 13) By George J. Simandl and Kirk D. Hancock KEYWOKLIS: Industrial minerals, rconomic geology. mag- nesitr. Cathedral Formation. Middle Cambrian. dolumitiz- tion, porosity. base metal association, deposit model. INTRODUCTION Magnesite (M&O,) is an induswial mineral that can bc converted into either caustic, fused or dead-burned magne- sia. Dead-burned magnesia is used mainly in the manufac- ture of refractory products; caustic magnesia is used in treatment of water, in animal feedstuffs, fertilizers. magne- sia cements, insulating boards and wood-pulp processing, in chemicals and pharmaceuticals and us a curing agent in rubber (Coope. 19X7). Magnesium metal is produced either from magnesite or from caustic mapnesia. In the short-term future. production of dead-burned mag- nesia is cxpectcd to remain constant. however, demand for caustic magnesia is increasing (Duncan, IYYO). With the increasing trend toward the use of high-perfomxmce “mag- carbon” refractories. future demand for fused magnesia looks promising. A number of magnesite deposits are known in British Columbia (Grzant, 19X7). the most important of these is the Mount Brussilof orebody. It is hosted by dolomites of the TECTONIC SETTING Middle Cambrian Cathedral Formation. The Mount Brussilof deposit is located in the Forekm3 rectonostratiEnlphic belt and within the “Kicking Horse HISTORY Rim”, as defined by Aitken (1971, 1989). It is situated east of a Cambrian bathymetric feature commonly referred to as The Mount Brussilof deposit was discovered during the Cathedral escarpment (Fritz. 1990: Aitken xnd regional mapping by the Geological Survey of Canada Mcllreath, 19X4, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Gill Slits and a Pharynx in Cambrian Vetulicolians: Implications for the Early Evolution of Deuterostomes Ou Et Al
    Evidence for gill slits and a pharynx in Cambrian vetulicolians: implications for the early evolution of deuterostomes Ou et al. Ou et al. BMC Biology 2012, 10:81 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/81 (2 October 2012) Ou et al. BMC Biology 2012, 10:81 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/81 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Evidence for gill slits and a pharynx in Cambrian vetulicolians: implications for the early evolution of deuterostomes Qiang Ou1, Simon Conway Morris2*, Jian Han3, Zhifei Zhang3, Jianni Liu3, Ailin Chen4, Xingliang Zhang3 and Degan Shu1,3* Abstract Background: Vetulicolians are a group of Cambrian metazoans whose distinctive bodyplan continues to present a major phylogenetic challenge. Thus, we see vetulicolians assigned to groups as disparate as deuterostomes and ecdysozoans. This divergence of opinions revolves around a strikingly arthropod-like body, but one that also bears complex lateral structures on its anterior section interpreted as pharyngeal openings. Establishing the homology of these structures is central to resolving where vetulicolians sit in metazoan phylogeny. Results: New material from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte helps to resolve this issue. Here, we demonstrate that these controversial structures comprise grooves with a series of openings. The latter are oval in shape and associated with a complex anatomy consistent with control of their opening and closure. Remains of what we interpret to be a musculature, combined with the capacity for the grooves to contract, indicate vetulicolians possessed a pumping mechanism that could process considerable volumes of seawater. Our observations suggest that food captured in the anterior cavity was transported to dorsal and ventral gutters, which then channeled material to the intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A COMPENDIUM OF FOSSIL MARINE FAMILIES J. JOHN SEPKOSKI, JR. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago REVIEWERS FOR THIS PUBLICATION: Robert Gernant, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee David M. Raup, Field Museum of Natural History Frederick R. Schram, San Diego Natural History Museum Peter M. Sheehan, Milwaukee Public Museum ISBN 0-893260-081-9 Milwaukee Public Museum Press Published by the Order of the Board of Trustees CONTENTS Abstract ---- ---------- -- - ----------------------- 2 Introduction -- --- -- ------ - - - ------- - ----------- - - - 2 Compendium ----------------------------- -- ------ 6 Protozoa ----- - ------- - - - -- -- - -------- - ------ - 6 Porifera------------- --- ---------------------- 9 Archaeocyatha -- - ------ - ------ - - -- ---------- - - - - 14 Coelenterata -- - -- --- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- 17 Platyhelminthes - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - - - 24 Rhynchocoela - ---- - - - - ---- --- ---- - - ----------- - 24 Priapulida ------ ---- - - - - -- - - -- - ------ - -- ------ 24 Nematoda - -- - --- --- -- - -- --- - -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 24 Mollusca ------------- --- --------------- ------ 24 Sipunculida ---------- --- ------------ ---- -- --- - 46 Echiurida ------ - --- - - - - - --- --- - -- --- - -- - - ---
    [Show full text]
  • The Spence Shale Lagerstätte: an Important Window Into Cambrian Biodiversity
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 24, 2021 Accepted Manuscript Journal of the Geological Society The Spence Shale Lagerstätte: an Important Window into Cambrian Biodiversity Julien Kimmig, Luke C. Strotz, Sara R. Kimmig, Sven O. Egenhoff & Bruce S. Lieberman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-195 Received 31 October 2018 Revised 21 February 2019 Accepted 28 February 2019 © 2019 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4423145 To cite this article, please follow the guidance at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/onlinefirst#cit_journal Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 24, 2021 The Spence Shale Lagerstätte: an Important Window into Cambrian Biodiversity 1* 1,2 1,3 4 1,2 Julien Kimmig , Luke C. Strotz , Sara R. Kimmig , Sven O. Egenhoff & Bruce S. Lieberman 1Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA 2 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA 4Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Spence Shale Member of the Langston Formation is a Cambrian (Miaolingian: Wuliuan) Lagerstätte in northeastern Utah and southeastern Idaho. It is older than the more well- known Wheeler and Marjum Lagerstätten from western Utah, and the Burgess Shale from Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoecology of the Early Cambrian Sinsk Biota from the Siberian Platform
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220 (2005) 69–88 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Palaeoecology of the Early Cambrian Sinsk biota from the Siberian Platform Andrey Yu. Ivantsova, Andrey Yu. Zhuravlevb,T, Anton V. Legutaa, Valentin A. Krassilova, Lyudmila M. Melnikovaa, Galina T. Ushatinskayaa aPalaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117997, Russia bA´rea y Museo de Paleontologı´a, faculdad de Ciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Pedro Cerbuna, 12, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain Received 1 February 2002; accepted 15 January 2004 Abstract The Sinsk biota (Early Cambrian, Botoman Stage, Siberian Platform) inhabited an open-marine basin within the photic zone, but in oxygen-depleted bottom waters. Its rapid burial in a fine-grained sediment under anoxic conditions led to the formation of one of the earliest Cambrian Lagerst7tte. All the organisms of the biota were adapted to a life under dysaerobic conditions. It seems possible that the adaptations of many Cambrian organisms, which composed the trophic nucleus of the Sinsk Algal Lens palaeocommunity to low oxygen tensions allowed them to diversify in the earliest Palaeozoic, especially during the Cambrian. Nowadays these groups comprise only a negligible part of communities and usually survive in settings with low levels of competition. Nonetheless, the organization of the Algal Lens palaeocommunity was not simple, it consisted of diverse trophic guilds. The tiering among sessile filter-feeders was well developed with the upper tier at the 50 cm level. In terms of individuals, the community was dominated by sessile filter-feeders, vagrant detritophages, and diverse carnivores/scavengers. The same groups, but in slightly different order, comprised the bulk of the biovolume: vagrant epifaunal and nektobenthic carnivores/ scavengers, sessile filter-feeders, and vagrant detritophages.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Journals — AAAS
    RESEARCH EARLY ANIMALS years. For instance, hopanes are the hydrocarbon remains of bacterial hopanepolyols, whereas sat- urated steranes and aromatic steroids are diage- Ancient steroids establish netic products of eukaryotic sterols. The most common sterols of Eukarya possess a cholester- oid, ergosteroid, or stigmasteroid skeleton with the Ediacaran fossil Dickinsonia 27, 28, or 29 carbon atoms, respectively. These C27 to C29 sterols, distinguished by the alkylation as one of the earliest animals patternatpositionC-24inthesterolsidechain, function as membrane modifiers and are widely 1 1 2 3 distributed across extant Eukarya, but their rela- Ilya Bobrovskiy *, Janet M. Hope , Andrey Ivantsov , Benjamin J. Nettersheim , 3,4 1 tive abundances can give clues about the source Christian Hallmann , Jochen J. Brocks * organisms (24). Apart from Dickinsonia (Fig.1B),whichis The enigmatic Ediacara biota (571 million to 541 million years ago) represents the first one of the most recognizable Ediacaran fossils, macroscopic complex organisms in the geological record and may hold the key to our dickinsoniids include Andiva (Fig. 1C and fig. understanding of the origin of animals. Ediacaran macrofossils are as “strange as life on S1), Vendia, Yorgia, and other flattened Edia- another planet” and have evaded taxonomic classification, with interpretations ranging from caran organisms with segmented metameric marine animals or giant single-celled protists to terrestrial lichens. Here, we show that lipid bodies and a median line along the body axes, biomarkers extracted from organically preserved Ediacaran macrofossils unambiguously separating the “segments.” The specimens for clarify their phylogeny. Dickinsonia and its relatives solely produced cholesteroids, a Downloaded from this study were collected from two surfaces in hallmark of animals.
    [Show full text]