Fortum in Russia Finnish-Russian Energy Days 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fortum in Russia Finnish-Russian Energy Days 2014 Fortum in Russia Finnish-Russian Energy Days 2014 Esa Hyvärinen Senior Vice President Corporate Relations Fortum Corporation 1 Our geographical presence Power Nordic countries Key figures 2013 generation Power generation* 46.5 TWh Sales EUR 5.3 bn Operating profit EUR 1.5 bn Heat Heat sales* 13.9 TWh Balance sheet EUR 23 bn Distribution customers Personnel 9,200 Distribution in Sweden 0.9 million Electricity Electricity customers 1.2 million Russia sales OAO Fortum Power generation 20.0 TWh Heat sales 24.2 TWh Great Britain (Sold in Oct ‘14) In addition, ~29% share in TGC-1 Power generation 1.0 TWh Heat sales 1.8 TWh Poland Baltic countries India Power generation 0.6 TWh Power generation 0.5 TWh Power generation ~9 GWh Heat sales 4.0 TWh Heat sales 1.1 TWh * incl. Fortum Värme; power generation 1.3 TWh and heat sales 8.2 TWh. 2 Fortum mid-sized European power generation player; globally major producer in heat Power generation Heat production Customers Largest producers in Europe and Russia, 2012 Largest global producers, 2012 Electricity customers in EU, 2012 TWh TWh Millions EDF *) Gazprom Enel E.ON ***) IES EDF Enel Dalkia E.ON RWE **) Inter RAO UES RWE Rosenergoatom Fortum Iberdrola *) Gazprom RusHydro Vattenfall DEI Vattenfall Centrica GDF SUEZ ****) Sibgenco **) CEZ Inter RAO UES EuroSibEnergo RusHydro EDP Quadra NNEGC Energoat. Vattenfall DTEK, Ukraine Iberdrola SSE EuroSibEnergo TGC-2 Lukoil EnBW Fortum GDF SUEZ CEZ Minskenergo KDHC, Korea Tauron EnBW PGE ***) IES Tatenergo Gas Natural Statkraft Dong Energy Fenosa PGE PGNiG Fortum DTEK *****) ELCEN. Dong Energy DEI TGC-14 Hafslund 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 20 40 60 80 100120 140 010 20 30 40 * incl. MOEK, ** incl. Bashkirenergo, *** incl. TGC-5, TGC-6, TGC-7, TGC-9, **** incl. TGC-12, TGC-13, ***** figure 2011, Fortum incl. Fortum Värme; power generation (1.2 TWh) and heat production (8 TWh). Source: Company information, Fortum analyses, 2012 figures pro forma, heat production of Beijing DH not available. 3 Appr. 110,000 shareholders • Power and heat company in the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltics • Listed at the Helsinki Stock Exchange since 1998 • Among the most traded shares on the NASDAQ OMX Helsinki stock exchange • Market cap ~16 billion euros Households 8.3% Financial and insurance institutions 1.5% Other Finnish investors 7.2% Foreign investors 32.2% Finnish State 50.8% Rest of the world ~7% Rest of Europe: ~13% US ~44% Germany ~5% Luxembourg ~10% Switzerland ~6% 31.10.2014 UK ~19% 4 Russian energy resources and energy markets are one of the biggest in the world – Power market the 5 th largest in the world Oil reserves Natural gas reserves 17 %* 17 billion tons billion Trillion cubic metres cubic Trillion 5%* Coal reserves Power generation 18%* TWh billion tons billion 5%* Electricity generation Based on gross output. *) share of World reserves or power generation Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2014, figures at end 2013; **) eia 2011 coal reserves for Serbia 5 Fortum has long experience of co-operation with the Soviet Union and Russia Construction of hydro power Construction of Loviisa Construction of North-West CHP plants in Kola area nuclear power plant in St. Petersburg Electricity import to Finland Agreement on Joint Implementation of Kyoto Nuclear fuel import to Finland* Protocol with TGC-1 Automation & information system deliveries to thermal power plants Executing of 2400 MW CSA investments Permanent presence in Moscow & Safety improvements for in OAO Fortum St. Petersburg nuclear power plants (6 units ready out of 8) Co-operation Hydro refurbishments Ownerships Lenenergo shareholding Lenenergo split -TGC-1, Generation -Lenenergo, Distribution (divested in 2007) TGC-10 acquisition, today OAO Fortum *) Including single largest purchase agreement of uranium with TVEL 6 Extensive investment programme in ОАО Fortum nearly finished – 2 units still to be commissioned • Total amount of investments EUR 2.5 billion – Of which approximately EUR 0.3 billion still to be invested as of September 2014 • Increasing capacity by ~ 85% by the end of 2015 OAO Fortum – More than any other Russian generating company St. Petersburg Nyagan Tobolsk • Six units commissioned Moscow Tyumen • Nyagan 3 was commissioned in October 2014 and starts Chelyabinsk commercial operations in January 2015 • Two new units in Chelyabinsk during H1/2015 MW 6,000 Six units commissioned Units 5,000 under construction Mar/Dec 2013, Oct 2014 Feb 2011 Jun 2011 Oct 2011 4,000 +85% 3,000 + ~2,400 2,000 ~5,200 2,785 1,000 Nyagan 1 + 2 + 3 Tyumen Chelyabinsk Tobolsk Chelyabinsk 0 420 + 424 + 422 MW 209 MW 216 MW 213 MW 2 x 248 MW 2010 2015 256 MWth 169 MWth 2 x 175 MWth 7 Heat sector reform an important tool to improve energy efficiency in Russia Basic principles of the proposed Current status and further actions new heat market model •Basic principles were adopted by President •The price-cap is to be set up at the level of Putin in April 2014 the “alternative heat-only boiler” •Heat Roadmap was signed by Prime Minister •The heat tariffs are to be gradually Medvedev in October 2014. The Roadmap transitioned to reach “alternative HOB” level implies price liberalization from 2020/2023 within 5-8 years •The new regulation is to be effective from •Full liberalization within the price cap at the 2016 level of “alternative HOB” of the heat prices http:// publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201410070001?index=0&range takes place after the transitional period Size=1 CHP Plants Condensing (co-generation) plants Boiler house 8 Key takeaways • Power market reform in Russia has been a success – good precedent for the heat sector reform • When it comes to heat sector, it is important to create incentives for efficiency improvements: – In generation and CHP in particular – Investments in heat distribution – Housing sector investments to enable customers to capture benefits from the reform • Heat sector reform should enable increased investments opening business opportunities between Finnish and Russian companies 9 Next generation energy company 10.
Recommended publications
  • Specialised Asset Management
    specialised research and investment group Russian Power: The Greatest Sector Reform on Earth www.sprin-g.com November 2010 specialised research and investment group Specialised Research and Investment Group (SPRING) Manage Investments in Russian Utilities: - HH Generation - #1 among EM funds (12 Months Return)* #2 among EM funds (Monthly return)** David Herne - Portfolio Manager Previous positions: Member, Board of Directors - Unified Energy Systems, Federal Grid Company, RusHydro, TGK-1, TGK-2, TGK-4, OGK-3, OGK-5, System Operator, Aeroflot, etc. (2000-2008) Chairman, Committee for Strategy and Reform - Unified Energy Systems (2001-2008) Boston Consulting Group, Credit Suisse First Boston, Brunswick. * Top 10 (by 12 Months Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 30 September 2010 ** Top 10 (by Monthly Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 31 August 2010 2 specialised research and investment group Russian power sector reform: Privatization Pre-Reform Post-Reform Government Government 52% 1 RusHydro 1 FSK RAO ES RAO UES 58% 79% hydro generation HV distribution 53% Far East Holding control control Independent energos 53% 1 MRSK Holding 14 TGKs 0% (Bashkir, Novosibirsk, ~72 energos 0% generation (CHP) generation Irkutsk, Tat) 35 federal plants transmission thermal 11 MRSK distribution 51% hydro LV distribution 0% ~72 SupplyCos supply 6 OGKs other 0% generation 45% InterRAO 0% ~100 RepairCos Source: UES, Companies Data, SPRING research 3 specialised research
    [Show full text]
  • a Leading Energy Company in the Nordic Area
    - a leading energy company in the Nordic area Presentation for investors September 2007 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. 2 • Fortum today • European power markets • Russia • Financials / outlook • Supplementary material 3 Fortum's strategy Fortum focuses on the Nordic and Baltic Rim markets as a platform for profitable growth Become the leading Become the power and heat energy supplier company of choice Benchmark business performance 4 Presence in focus market areas Nordic Generation 53.2 TWh Electricity sales 60.2 TWh Distribution cust. 1.6 mill. Electricity cust. 1.3 mill. NW Russia Heat sales 20.1 TWh (in associated companies) Power generation ~6 TWh Heat production ~7 TWh Baltic countries Heat sales 1.0 TWh Poland Distribution cust. 23,000 Heat sales 3.6 TWh Electricity sales 8 GWh 2006 numbers 5 Fortum Business structure Fortum Markets Fortum's comparable Large operating profit in 2006 NordicNordic customers EUR 1,437 million Fortum wholesalewholesale Small Power marketmarket customers Generation Nord Pool and Markets 0% bilateral Other retail companies Deregulated Distribution 17% Regulated Transmission Power and system Fortum Heat 17% Generation services Distribution 66% 6 Strong financial position ROE (%) EPS, cont. (EUR) Total assets (EUR billion) 20 1.50 1.42 20.0 16.8 17.5 17.3 1.22 18 15.1
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report of PJSC Inter RAO / Report on Sustainable Development and Environmental Responsibility
    INFORMATION TRANSLATION Draft 2017 Annual Report of PJSC Inter RAO / Report on Sustainable Development and Environmental Responsibility Chairman of the Management Board Boris Kovalchuk Chief Accountant Alla Vainilavichute Contents 1. Strategic Report ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. At a Glance .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2. About the Report ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Differences from the Development Process of the 2016 Report ............................................................................................................ 11 Scope of Information ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Responsibility for the Report Preparation .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Statement on Liability Limitations .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Joint-Stock Company Issuer’S Code: 10214-A
    QUARTERLY REPORT "Interregional Distribution Grid Company of Centre", Public Joint-Stock Company Issuer’s code: 10214-A for Quarter 1, 2016 Location of the issuer: 2nd Yamskaya, 4, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127018 The information containing in this quarterly report is subject to disclosure in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation on securities ____________ O.Y. Isaev General Director signature Date: 13 May 2016 Chief Accountant - Head of Financial and Tax Accounting and ____________ L.A. Sklyarova signature Reporting Department Date: 13 May 2016 Contact person: Principal Specialist of Corporate Office of the Department for Corporate Governance and Interaction with Shareholders, Yulia Dmitrievna Naumova Phone: (495) 747-9292 #3286 Fax: (495) 747-9295 E-mail: [email protected] Internet site used by the issuer for the information disclosure, containing in this quarterly report: http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=7985; http://www.mrsk-1.ru/ru/information/. 1 Table of contents Table of contents .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Section I. Data on bank accounts, on the auditor, appraiser and financial adviser of the issuer, and also persons, who signed the quarterly report ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Inter RAO Group Today | 11
    10 | PJSC Inter RAO | 2016 Annual Report 3. INTER RAO GROUP TODAY The Group operates in the following segments: A leading electricity export and import operator in Rus- — Electricity and heat generation sia. The Inter RAO Group’s supply geography comprises — Electricity supply and heat supply Finland, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Nor- — International electricity trading way, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, South Ossetia, Ka- A diversified energy holding company — Engineering, power equipment export zakhstan, China and Mongolia. managing assets in Russia, as well as — Management of electricity distribution grids outside Russia Effectively manages power supply companies – guaran- in European and CIS countries. teed suppliers in 12 regions of Russia. Since 2010, PJSC Inter RAO has been rated in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint Stock Compa- Owns independent suppliers of electricity to large indus- nies of the Russian Federation1. trial consumers. GENERATING ASSETS SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ELECTRICITY EXPORT in 2016 THERMAL POWER PLANTS 41 17.0bn kWh ELECTRICITY IMPORT HYDROPOWER PLANTS 62 (including 5 low capacity HPPs) 10 in 2016 IN 62 REGIONS OF RUSSIA bn kWh WIND FARMS 3.1 1 According to the Decree of the President of Russia No. 1190 dated 30.09.2010 PJSC Inter RAO was included in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint-Stock Companies (Section 2 of the List of Open Joint Stock Companies with its assets held in federal ownership managed by the Russian Federation in order to ensure strategic 2 interests of State defence and security, moral values, healthcare, rights and legitimate interests protection of the citizens of the Russian Federation).
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Feasibility of Measuring Market Risk by Predicted Beta with Liquidity Adjustment1
    Testing Feasibility of Measuring Market Risk by Predicted Beta with Liquidity Adjustment1 State University – Higher School of Economics Laboratory of Financial Markers Analysis Abstract The present paper assesses the CAPM predicted beta coefficient which is employed by a number of Russian investment companies in the calculation of a discount rate for future cash flows valuation. It is common practice to estimate the target stock price within the DCF method using the single-factor CAPM where the beta coefficient is the only measure of investment risk. A shift from the historical to the predicted beta coefficient is due to low liquidity of the majority of Russian stocks which results in rather low historical beta coefficients obtained by regressing on historical data. The paper assesses a new method of calculating the beta coefficient introduced by Aton Investment Company which dismisses company’s industry-specific characteristics while accentuating company’s size (measured by market capitalization) and liquidity (measured by the free-float coefficient). The sample size is 72 Russian stocks traded on the Russian Trading System (RTS) Stock Exchange. The sample period is from 2007 to the first half of 2008. Key words: CAPM, historical beta, free-float, adjusted beta, predicted beta adjusted for liquidity. 1 A working paper version. Problems in application of CAPM in emerging capital markets The single-factor equilibrium Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) of the rate of return on equity and equity risk premium (ERP) remains the most popular one for setting a discount rate which is further used in calculating the equity (company) fair price within the Discounted Cash Flow method (DCF).
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT JSC Interregional Distribution Grid
    QUARTERLY REPORT JSC Interregional Distribution Grid Companies Holding Issuer Code: 55385-Е Quarter 3 of 2012 Registered address of the issuer: Russia, 107996, Moscow, Ulansky pereulok, 26 The information contained in this Quarterly Report is subject to disclosure in accordance with the securities laws of the Russian Federation Executive Director of JSC IDGC Holding ____________ A. Ye. Murov signature Details of the agreement whereby the powers of the issuer’s sole executive body were transferred: Agreement No. 1007 of July 10, 2012, valid until July 9, 2013 Power of Attorney of September 12, 2012, valid until September 11, 2013 Date: November 14, 2012 Chief Accountant ____________ G. I. Zhabbarova signature Date: November 12, 2012 Contact person: Kseniya Valerievna Khokholkova, Head of the Information Disclosure Unit of the Department for Corporate Governance and Shareholder Relations Telephone: (495) 995-5333 #5595 Fax: (495) 620-1755 E-mail: [email protected] The information contained in this Quarterly Report is available on the Internet at www.holding-mrsk.ru / http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=13806 1 Contents Contents................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Brief Information Concerning Individual Members of
    [Show full text]
  • E P R G W O R K in G P a P
    Market power issues in the reformed Russian electricity supply industry EPRG Working Paper 1333 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1358 Nadia Chernenko Abstract The paper examines long-run and short-run levels of market power in the liberalised Russian electricity market. We observe that despite potential for market power abuse, actual exercise of market power as measured by price-cost markups remained low. We attribute the result to the bid-at-cost rule implemented as a part of a special unit commitment procedure on the day-ahead market. We first look at the restructured industry and discuss the mergers and acquisitions and their impact on competition in long term. The M&A were undertaken in different market zones and thus did not seem to increase concentration (HHI remains almost unchanged) although with future zone integration competition in long run is put at risk. We then examine short-run level of market power by estimating hourly price-cost mark-ups and assessing their dynamics in 2010 and 2011, a year preceeding and following the G PAPER market liberalisation respectively. Using time series models (AR models) N we reject hypothesis of actual market power abuse. Further, using a Tobit regression we find that the liberalisation decreased the mark-ups by about 1.66 percetage points. .Keywords Russian electricity market, liberalisation, market power, concentration, price-cost mark-ups JEL Classification L11, L13, L94 Contact [email protected] Publication June 2013 EPRG WORKI Financial Support Trinity College Eastern European Research Bursary www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk EPRG 1333 Market power issues in the reformed Russian electricity supply industry Nadia Chernenko October 2013 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • INTER RAO UES Generating Assets: Target Shareholding Structure
    INTER RAO UES Generating Assets: Target Shareholding Structure March,16 2012 1. Strategy recap and update INTER RAO at a Glance A Leading Russian Power Company Diversified Group Structure . Diversified power holding involved in electricity/heat generation and supply, export/import of electricity and engineering . Operates and manages 27 thermal, 2 hydro power plants and 1 wind power farm Domestic Engineering . Total installed electricity capacity of 29GW and electricity output of Generation Trading Supply International 117 TWh⁽¹⁾ in 2011 . INTER RAO – . RAO Nordic Oy . 9 supply companies . Generation: . Quartz Group . 2 Hydro PP - 0.2 GW Electrogeneration (Finland) . Customer base: . 4 Thermal PP - 5.2 GW . JV with Worley Leading Russian export-import operator accounting for 97% of Russian (100%) . Kazenergoresurs . 1 wind power farm - Parsons electricity export in 2011 . 314 thousand 0.03 GW . OGK-1 (75%) (Kazakhstan) legal entities and . Distribution . JV with Rosatom . OGK-3 (82%) . TGR Enerji (Turkey) . c. 34 ths. km of power . Operations in over 14 countries, including Russia, Belarus, Lithuania, 9.8 million . JV with GE lines (Georgia, residential . TGK-11 (68%) . INTER RAO Lietuva Armenia) Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Moldova, and Finland . EMAlliance (the Baltics) customers Engineering (2) . Listed on RTS and MICEX (List A1), MCAP of $10.2bn. Shares are (2) included into MSCI Large Caps Index (0,54%) . GDRs admitted to LSE trading Ownership Structure Broad Geographical Coverage INTER RAO UES Finland Generation Assets
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Grid Company of Unified Energy System
    FEDERAL GRID COMPANY OF UNIFIED ENERGY SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT WorldReginfo - b29cb2af-cbc8-402d-b3a6-fffe86634d00 ANNUAL REPORT 2008 WorldReginfo - b29cb2af-cbc8-402d-b3a6-fffe86634d00 Address to Shareholders Operating Corporate Operating Development of the Human Resources Environmental policy. Attachments of Chairmen of Board Results (13) Governance (23) Activity (51) Corporate Information management and Corporate Social (127) of Directors and Management System Social policy. Responsibility (117) Management Board (5) (CIMS) and Telecom- Social Partnership (103) munication Network (91) History of Establishing Scientific and Technical Contact information Most Important and Core Types Economics and work and Innovative for Shareholders Events in 2008 (9) of Activity (17) Securities (43) Finance (71) Investments (81) Procurement (99) Technologies (111) and Investors (123) WorldReginfo - b29cb2af-cbc8-402d-b3a6-fffe86634d00 CHAPTER 1. ADDRESS TO SHAREHOLDERS OF CHAIRMEN OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT BOARD 4 5 WorldReginfo - b29cb2af-cbc8-402d-b3a6-fffe86634d00 FGC UES Annual Report 2008 Chapter 1 Address to Shareholders of Chairmen of Board of Directors and Management Board Address to shareholders of Chairmen of Board of Directors and Management Board During 2008 the Company continued realization of its large-scale investment program. JSC FGC UES invested RUR 136.221 billion into modernization of assets within the Unified national energy grid (UNEG) enabling to put into service 1,047 km of electric energy transmis- sion facilities; 10,314 MVA of transformer capacity; 1,285 MVA of reactor capacity, back up commissioning of future periods. Key UNEG facilities were commissioned during 2008. In particular, modernization of substations 500 kV Beskudnikovo and 500 kV Otchakovo was completed and substation 500 kV Zapadnaya was built within the Moscow energy system that increased reliability, transmission capacity of the backbone grid and provided for con- necting new customers in Moscow and Moscow region.
    [Show full text]
  • Committed to the Green Economy
    Committed to the green economy ANNUAL REPORT 2020 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE “ In this unprecedented year, we have remained committed to our vision for a green economy and low-carbon future. A future where innovation creates products for tomorrow, energy is cleaner and where symbiosis drives cost leadership.” Rt Hon Lord Barker of Battle, Executive Chairman For more on sustainability please visit our webpage at www.enplusgroup.com/en/ sustainability/ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE We are committed to… Aluminium Generating Protecting Driving cost for tomorrow clean energy our people leadership 02 04 06 08 Strategic report Financial statements 02 Aluminium for tomorrow 128 Statement of Management’s Responsibilities 04 Generating clean energy 129 Independent Auditors’ Report 06 Protecting our people 133 Consolidated Statement of Profit or 08 Driving cost leadership Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 10 Chairman’s statement 135 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 14 Pathway to net zero 136 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 16 Meeting consumer demand 138 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 18 The journey of our products 140 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 20 CEO’s statement 22 Our strategy Appendix 24 At a glance 208 Glossary 26 Business model 215 Contacts 28 Key performance indicators 216 About the Report 30 Investment case 32 Business review Appendices 50 Financial review (provided as a separate document) 66 Sustainability review Appendix 1: Report on compliance with 68 Supporting the UN SDGs the Russian Corporate Governance
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow, Russian Federation September 21, 2007 Dear Holders of Depositary Receipts: the Board of Directors of Open Joint-Stock Co
    Moscow, Russian Federation September 21, 2007 Dear Holders of Depositary Receipts: The Board of Directors of Open Joint-Stock Company Unified Energy System of Russia (‘‘RAO UES’’) decided on July 27, 2007 to call an extraordinary general meeting of RAO UES shareholders (the ‘‘EGM’’) for approval of shareholders, including holders of depositary receipts, of a reorganization involving: • the spin-offs by RAO UES to newly-formed Russian open joint-stock companies established by RAO UES (each, a ‘‘Holdco’’ and collectively, the ‘‘Holdcos’’) of the entire equity interests of RAO UES in certain of its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Spin-Offs’’), including (i) six wholesale generating companies (the ‘‘OGKs’’), comprised of five wholesale thermal generating companies and Open Joint-Stock Company ‘‘The Federal Hydro-Generation Company’’ (‘‘HydroOGK’’), (ii) thirteen territorial generating companies (the ‘‘TGKs’’ and together with the OGKs, the ‘‘Gencos’’), (iii) power companies in the Far East and other isolated areas (the ‘‘Far East Energos’’), (iv) inter-regional distribution grid companies (‘‘MRSKs’’) and distribution grid companies (‘‘RSKs’’), (v) Open Joint-Stock Company the Federal Grid Company of Unified Energy System (the ‘‘FSK’’) and the trunk grid companies, (vi) Closed Joint-Stock Company ‘‘Inter RAO UES’’ (‘‘InterRAO’’), (vii) Open Joint-Stock Company Sochinskaya TES (‘‘Sochinskaya TES’’) and (viii) Open Joint-Stock Company System Operator-Central Dispatching Office of the Unified Energy System (the ‘‘System Operator’’ and together with the Gencos,
    [Show full text]