DOCSLIB.ORG

FORTUM a Leading Power and Heat Company in the Nordic Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FORTUM A leading power and heat company in the Nordic area Investor/Analyst material June 2010 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. 2 Content Fortum today European power markets Russia Financials and outlook Our geographical presence today Nr 1 Heat Nordic countries Nr 1 Distribution Generation 48.1 TWh Electricity sales 54.9 TWh Nr 2 Electricity Heat sales 18.0 TWh sales Distribution cust. 1.6 million Nr 3 Power Electricity cust. 1.2 million generation Russia TGC-1 (~25%) Power generation ~6 TWh Heat sales ~8 TWh Poland Heat sales 3.7 TWh OAO Fortum Electricity sales 20 GWh Power generation 16.0 TWh Heat sales 25.6 TWh Baltic countries Heat sales 1.3 TWh Electricity sales 0.1 TWh Distribution cust. 24,100 4 Capital returns Dividend per share EUR 1.35 1.26 Total ~ 6,853 MEUR 1.12 1.00 1.00 • Dividend 2009 EUR 1.00 per 0.58 0.53 share, in total ~EUR 0.9 billion 0.54 0.58 • Dividend policy of 50-60% 0.42 payout of previous year's 0.26 0.31 0.23 0.77 0.73 results on the average 0.13 0.18 0.58 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 72% 103% 78% 58% 68% 5 Fortum’s strategic route Separation of Länsivoima Länsivoima Elnova oil businesses E.ON Finland 45% → 65% →100% 50% → 100% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Neste IVO Divestment of Lenenergo Stora Birka Energi Gullspång Birka Energi Østfold shares 50% Fortum Kraft 50% → 100% Starting 50% Stockholm Shares in TGC-10 Skandinaviska TGC-1 Elverk Hafslund District heat Gullspång Shares in in Poland Stockholm Lenenergo 2003 → Energi 6 Organisational structure as of 1 October 2009 President and CEO Business Staff Functions Divisions Tapio Kuula Power (Espoo) Finance Executive Vice President Executive Vice President and Matti Ruotsala Chief Financial Officer Juha Laaksonen Heat (Stockholm) Corporate Relations Executive Vice President and Sustainability Per Langer Executive Vice President Anne Brunila Russia (Chelyabinsk) Corporate Human Resources Executive Vice President Senior Vice President Alexander Chuvaev Mikael Frisk Electricity Solutions and Corporate Strategy and R&D Distribution (Espoo) Senior Vice President Executive Vice President Maria Paatero-Kaarnakari Timo Karttinen Country responsibles: Timo Karttinen / Finland, Norway; Per Langer / Sweden, Poland, Baltics; Alexander Chuvaev / Russia Improved efficiency, accountability, simplicity 7 A leading Nordic power and heat company • Leading power and heat company in Nordic countries • Listed at the Helsinki Stock Exchange 1998 • Approximately 95,000 shareholders • Among the most traded shares in Helsinki stock exchange • Market cap ~17 billion euros Households 7.4% Financial and insurance institutions 2.7% Other Finnish investors 9.1% Finnish State 50.8% Foreign investors 30.0% 31 May 2010 8 Fortum in the Nordic electricity value chain Fortum Markets Large NordicNordic customers wholesalewholesale Fortum Small marketmarket Power customers Nord Pool and bilateral Other retail companies Deregulated Regulated Transmission and system Fortum services Distribution 9 Fortum mid-sized European power generation player, Global #4 in heat Power generation Heat production Largest producers in Europe and Russia, 2008 TWh Largest global producers, 2008 TWh EDF *) IES E.ON Gazprom Enel **) Dalkia RWE+Essent Fortum Gazprom Vattenfall Vattenfall+Nuon RAO ES East Rosenergoatom ***) SUEK GDF SUEZ Tatenergo Iberdrola Bashkirenergo NNEGC Energoat. Onexim RusHydro Irkutskenergo Fortum TGC-2 IES Lukoil CEZ Kievenergo EnBW Minsk Energo Statkraft Irkutskenergo TGC-11 PGE Dong DEI KDHC, Korea WGC-1 Beijing DH Edison TGC-14 Scottish&Southern ELCEN, Rom. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 * incl. TGC-5, TGC-6, TGC-7, TGC-9, *** incl. TGC-12, TGC-13 Source Company information, Fortum analyses, 2008 figures pro forma, ** 2007 10 Fortum's European power and heat production Fortum's European Fortum's European power generation in 2009 heat production in 2009 Hydro power 45% Biomass fuels 22% Coal 22% Other 2% Natural gas Peat 1% Biomass 2% Other 7% 20% Natural gas 3% Coal 4% Peat 4% Oil 5% Waste 6% Nuclear power 43% Heat pumps,electricity 14% European generation 49.3 TWh European production 23.2 TWh (Generation capacity 11,155 MW) (Production capacity 10,534 MW) 11 Fortum's carbon exposure among the lowest in Europe g CO2/kWh electricity, 2008 1200 1000 800 600 Average 350 g/kWh 400 200 41 0 DEI Enel CEZ EDF EDP Drax PVO RWE Nuon E.ON Fortum Statkraft Verbund Iberdrola Vattenfall Dong Energy Union Fenosa Union British Energy GDF Suez Europe Scottish&Southern Source: PWC & Enerpresse, 2009 Changement climatique et Électricité 12 Fortum’s investment programme – Nordic region, Poland and Baltic countries Project Electricity, MW Heat, MW Commissioned Olkiluoto 3, Finland 400 2012 Swedish nuclear upgrades 260 by 2013 - Forsmark 3 upgrade (to be decided) 30 post 2013 Refurbishing of hydro power 20-30 annually Częstochowa, Poland 65 120 Q3/2010 (coal/biomass CHP) Pärnu, Estonia 20 45 Q4/2010 (coal/biomass CHP) Brista, Sweden (to be decided) 20 60 2013? (waste CHP) Klaipeda, Lithuania 20 50 2013 (biofuel/waste CHP) Total by ~2013 >900 ~300 Electricity capacity over 900 MW ~95% CO2-free 13 Fortum today European power markets Russia Financials and outlook Key EU objectives by 2020 • Minimum reduction of EU • Implementation of CO2 emissions 20% (2020) internal energy markets • Renewables 20% (2020) • Energy efficiency +20% • Development of CO2 (2020) Competitiveness Sustainability capture and storage • Increased resources for technology development Security of supply • Development of cross-border transmission • Increase in own production • Enhancement of external energy relations 15 New capacity, except nuclear, will require over 60 EUR/MWh power price EUR/MWh EUR/MWh 110 110 CO2 cost 100 100 Other costs( variation) 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 Futures 50 27 May 2010 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 1995 -97 -99 -01 -03 -05 -07 -09 -11 -13 -15 Coal Gas Nuclear Hydro Wind Clean coal Source: Nord Pool Estimated lifetime average cost in nominal 2014 terms. Large variations in cost of new hydro and wind due to location and conditions. 16 Market coupling milestones • Market coupling between Netherlands (APX), Belgium (Belpex) and France (Powernext) since 2006 2011 • Market coupling Germany (EPEX Spot) – Denmark (Nord Pool) started on 9 November 2009. Baltic Cable (Germany – Sweden) and NorNed (Norway – NL) will possibly be included later. • Market coupling for Central Western Europe (DE, FR, BeNeLux) due to start during spring 2010 2010 2010- 2013 • CWE and Nordic TSOs agreed in October 2009 to develop a Nov single market coupling mechanism across their whole area 2009 6 0 0 • NL-UK coupling planned trough the BritNed cable from 2011 2 • Estonian price area to Nord Pool to be set up in April 2010 with full integration of the Baltic States during 2011-2013 • EU’s European Target Model for cross-border power trading sets 2015 as deadline for an EU-wide market coupling 17 Current transmission capacity from Nordic area to Continental Europe is ~4000 MW Transmission Countries capacity MW From Nordel To Nordel Denmark - Germany 2 100 1 550 Sweden - Germany 600 600 Sweden - Poland 600 600 Norway - Netherlands 700 700 350 Total 4 000 3 450 700 • Theoretical maximum in transmission capacity ~35 TWh per annum 2100 600 600 • Net export from Nordic area to Continental Europe in 2008 was ~15 TWh and in 2009 ~5 TWh • Approximately 20 TWh net export fairly easily reachable 18 Nordic and Continental markets are integrating – interconnection capacity could double by 2020 1400 MW link to the UK could connect offshore New interconnections could wind, too; North Seas Countries’ Offshore Grid double the capacity to over Initiative launched for supergrid development 8000 MW by 2020 Additional 700 MW cable New internal Nordic grid NO-NL, as well 1400 MW investments provide for NO-DE links studied increased available capacity for export to the Continent and Baltics EU financial support for 700 MW DK-NL link to EU’s European Energy connect offshore wind, too Programme for Recovery to cofinance to Estlink 2 Jylland – DE capacity to be and NordBalt increased by 500 MW in 2012 LitPol Link of 1000 MW and by further 500 MW by 2018 to connect the Baltic In the EU's Second Strategic Energy market to Poland by EU support to connect Review the Commission focuses 2015/18. It would open Kriegers Flak offshore wind strongly on interconnecting the Baltic a new transmission area to DK&DE; new 400 kV states and Poland to form an electricity route from the Nordic AC cable SE-DK by 2017 market around the Baltic Sea market to the Continent 19 Nordic water reservoirs 120 100 80 60 40 reservoir content (TWh) reservoir 20 2003 2008 2009 2010 reference level 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Source: Nord Pool 20 Demand picking up Tyumen Russia Chelyabinsk Russia Urals area Norway Nordic Sweden Denmark Finland 15 % 15 % 10 % 10 % 5 % 5 % 0 % 0 % -5 % -5 % -10 % -10 % Q2 2009 vs Q2 2008 Q2 2009 vs Q2 2008 -15 % Q3 2009 vs Q3 2008 -15 % Q3 2009 vs Q3 2008 Q4 2009 vs Q4 2008 Q4 2009 vs Q4 2008 Q1 2010 vs Q1 2009 Q1 2010 vs Q1 2009 -20 % -20 % Q1/10 consumption increased +7%in the Nordic area Q1/10 consumption increased +6% in Russia (Year-on-year) (Year-on-year) Tyumen +2%, Chelyabinsk +13% • Fortum currently expects Nordic power demand to recover back to the 2008 level by 2012-2014 21 Wholesale price for electricity EUR/MWh Nord Pool System Price Forwards 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 27 May 2010 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: Nord Pool 22 Nord Pool year forwards €/MWh Year 07 Year 08 Year 09 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 75 27 May 2010 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 23 Wholesale prices for electricity EUR/MWh Spot prices Forward prices 110 100 90 80 70 Dutch 60 German 50 40 Nordic 30 Russian* 20 10 0 26 May 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 * Including capacity tariff estimate.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report

    2019 Annual Report

    2019 Contents. INTRODUCTION About us. 1 This is Ellevio. 2 ELLEVIO 2019 Review of 2019. 4 CEO’S STATEMENT Network vital for climate targets. 6 MARKET CONDITIONS AND DRIVERS Market conditions. 8 The Swedish electricity market – how it works. 11 Drivers. 13 VALUE CREATION From the little things to the big things. 18 Society. 20 Customers. 23 Employees. 26 Environment. 32 Owners. 35 INVESTMENTS AND FINANCING Investments. 36 Financing. 42 ANNUAL REPORT 47 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 75 SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES Management. 80 Results. 83 GRI index. 91 The Annual Report consists of an Administration Report, Financial Statements and notes on pages 45–74. (The auditors’ report appears on pages 73–74.) The sustainability report has been produced in line with Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) standards ”core” level. The complete sustainability report comprises the description of our sustainability efforts on pages 2–5,8–43 along with Sustainability Disclosures and the GRI index on pages 82–96. The sustainability report also covers Ellevio’s Communication on Progress to the UN Global Compact. The statutory sustainability report in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act can be found on pages 2–5, 18–35 and 82–96. Ellevio AB (publ) Box 242 07 104 51 Stockholm www.ellevio.se All values are expressed in SEK. Figures within parentheses refer to 2018, unless specified otherwise. The data concerning markets and the competitive situation are Ellevio’s own estimates unless a specific source is indicated. These estimates are based on the best and latest available facts from published sources. About us. Sometimes it’s warm, sometimes it’s cold.
  • Specialised Asset Management

    Specialised Asset Management

    specialised research and investment group Russian Power: The Greatest Sector Reform on Earth www.sprin-g.com November 2010 specialised research and investment group Specialised Research and Investment Group (SPRING) Manage Investments in Russian Utilities: - HH Generation - #1 among EM funds (12 Months Return)* #2 among EM funds (Monthly return)** David Herne - Portfolio Manager Previous positions: Member, Board of Directors - Unified Energy Systems, Federal Grid Company, RusHydro, TGK-1, TGK-2, TGK-4, OGK-3, OGK-5, System Operator, Aeroflot, etc. (2000-2008) Chairman, Committee for Strategy and Reform - Unified Energy Systems (2001-2008) Boston Consulting Group, Credit Suisse First Boston, Brunswick. * Top 10 (by 12 Months Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 30 September 2010 ** Top 10 (by Monthly Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 31 August 2010 2 specialised research and investment group Russian power sector reform: Privatization Pre-Reform Post-Reform Government Government 52% 1 RusHydro 1 FSK RAO ES RAO UES 58% 79% hydro generation HV distribution 53% Far East Holding control control Independent energos 53% 1 MRSK Holding 14 TGKs 0% (Bashkir, Novosibirsk, ~72 energos 0% generation (CHP) generation Irkutsk, Tat) 35 federal plants transmission thermal 11 MRSK distribution 51% hydro LV distribution 0% ~72 SupplyCos supply 6 OGKs other 0% generation 45% InterRAO 0% ~100 RepairCos Source: UES, Companies Data, SPRING research 3 specialised research
  • Management at Nuclear Power Plants

    Management at Nuclear Power Plants

    Cov-ISOE 2004 6069 5/10/05 15:53 Page 1 Radiation Protection AIEA IAEA Occupational Exposure Management at Nuclear Power Plants OECD Nuclear Energy Agency International Atomic Energy Agency Fourth ISOE ISOE European Symposium Lyon, France INFORMATION SYSTEM ON OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 24-26 March 2004 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY Radioactive Waste Management Occupational Exposure Management at Nuclear Power Plants Fourth ISOE European Workshop Lyon, France 24-26 March 2004 Organised by the European Commission and the European Technical Centre (CEPN) © OECD 2005 NEA No. 6069 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members.
  • Swepol Link Sets New Environmental Standard for HVDC Transmission

    Swepol Link Sets New Environmental Standard for HVDC Transmission

    00 ABB Review 4/2001 SwePol Link sets new environmental standard for HVDC transmission Leif Söderberg, Bernt Abrahamsson Six cable links – all of them HVDC (high-voltage direct current) – are currently in service between the power grids of continental Europe and the Nordic region, with another five planned. The latest to be brought on line is the SwePol Link, which connects the electricity networks of Poland and Sweden. It is unique in that, unlike previous installations that depend on electrode stations to transmit the return current under ground or under water, it uses 20-kV XLPE cable to carry this current. The high-voltage HVDC submarine cable used for the SwePol Link is designed for 600 MW at 450 kV. he reason for all these links is the technically feasible to reverse the entire onds to prevent grid failure if the voltage T vital need to secure power system 600 MW power throughput of the in southern Sweden drops below 380 kV. reliability in each of the participating SwePol Link in just 1.3 seconds, although With all previous links of this kind, countries. They make it easier to this is not a feature that will be used in electrode stations off the coast transmit optimize power generation in an area in practice. Nevertheless, a typical emer- the return current under the sea, and this which different countries use different gency power measure could call for a has worked perfectly well (Table 1). The means of power generation and have ∆P ramp-up of 300 MW within a few sec- first such cable link was laid in 1954 different power demand profiles over a 24-hour period.
  • SKI Report 02:18 Nuclear Weapons Research in Sweden Research

    SKI Report 02:18 Nuclear Weapons Research in Sweden Research

    SKI’s perspective Background In the year 1998 Sweden, together with the rest of the states in the European Union and Euratom signed the Additional Protocol to the Safeguard Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA. The Additional Protocol gives the Agency extended complimentary access to areas and buildings and rights to take environmental samples within a state. The process of ratification is going on with the intention that the protocol should be implemented simultaneously in all member states. In ratifying the agreement in May 2000, Sweden changed its Act on Nuclear Activities and passed a new law regarding inspections. The present estimate is that the protocol could be implemented in the beginning of 2003 after ratification in all EU member states. Aim When the Additional Protocol is implemented, Sweden is to be “mapped” by the IAEA, scrutinising all nuclear activities, present as well as future plans. In the light of this, SKI has chosen to go one step further, letting Dr Thomas Jonter of the Department of History at Uppsala University investigate Sweden’s past activities in the area of nuclear weapons research in a political perspective. Dr Jonter has previously studied the Swedish National Defence Research Institute’s (FOA) activities in this area up until 1972. This report deals with the civilian research programme and its links to the military plans to produce nuclear weapons. Since Sweden had plans in the nuclear weapons area it is important to show to the IAEA that all such activities have stopped. This is the main objective with this report. Results Dr Jonter has made a survey of available sources in the archives at Studsvik and FOI, where the records of the AB Atomenergi company are stored.
  • Certified Environmental Product Declaration EPD of Electricity From

    Certified Environmental Product Declaration EPD of Electricity From

    Certified Environmental Product Declaration EPD® of Electricity from Vattenfall Nordic Nuclear Power Plants UNCPC Code 17, Group 171 – Electrical energy The International EPD® system, EPD International AB - In line with ISO 14025 S-P 00923 2019-12-31 Vattenfall AB - Vattenfall AB Nuclear Power Confidentiality class: None (C1) Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 8 1.1. Declared Unit ............................................................................................................ 8 ® 1.2. The Declaration and the EPD system....................................................................... 8 ® 1.3. Vattenfall, LCA and EPD ......................................................................................... 8 2. Producer and product ............................................................................ 9 2.1. Producer .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2. Product System Description .................................................................................... 11 3. Environmental Performance Based on LCA ........................................ 17 3.1. Life Cycle Assessment Method ............................................................................... 17 3.2. Technical Service Life, Reference Flow, Reference Year ......................................... 17 3.3. System Boundaries, Allocation and Data Sources ...................................................
  • a Leading Energy Company in the Nordic Area

    a Leading Energy Company in the Nordic Area

    - a leading energy company in the Nordic area Presentation for investors September 2007 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. 2 • Fortum today • European power markets • Russia • Financials / outlook • Supplementary material 3 Fortum's strategy Fortum focuses on the Nordic and Baltic Rim markets as a platform for profitable growth Become the leading Become the power and heat energy supplier company of choice Benchmark business performance 4 Presence in focus market areas Nordic Generation 53.2 TWh Electricity sales 60.2 TWh Distribution cust. 1.6 mill. Electricity cust. 1.3 mill. NW Russia Heat sales 20.1 TWh (in associated companies) Power generation ~6 TWh Heat production ~7 TWh Baltic countries Heat sales 1.0 TWh Poland Distribution cust. 23,000 Heat sales 3.6 TWh Electricity sales 8 GWh 2006 numbers 5 Fortum Business structure Fortum Markets Fortum's comparable Large operating profit in 2006 NordicNordic customers EUR 1,437 million Fortum wholesalewholesale Small Power marketmarket customers Generation Nord Pool and Markets 0% bilateral Other retail companies Deregulated Distribution 17% Regulated Transmission Power and system Fortum Heat 17% Generation services Distribution 66% 6 Strong financial position ROE (%) EPS, cont. (EUR) Total assets (EUR billion) 20 1.50 1.42 20.0 16.8 17.5 17.3 1.22 18 15.1
  • 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands

    20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands

    20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands VDE-Bezirksverein Kassel e.V., Universität Kassel am 21.01.2016 Walter Schossig, Gotha VDE Ausschuss Geschichte der Elektrotechnik [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 1 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Chronologie Entstehung von Verbundnetzen Trennung des Deutschen Verbundnetzes Entwicklung in Ost- und Westeuropa Innerdeutscher Stromexport Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Erweiterung des Europäischen Verbundnetzes Ein Auszug der Vortragsfolien. Bei Interesse an Quellenangaben oder weiteren Informationen: [email protected] bzw. www.walter-schossig.de/Literatur [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 2 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Beginn der Stromversorgung 1866-1878 Technisch wirtschaftliche Versuche 1878-1884 Einzelanlagen 1884-1890 Blockanlagen 1890-1900 Ortszentralen 1900-1913 Überlandzentralen 1913-1915 Anfänge der Verbundwirtschaft [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 3 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands < Einzelanlagen 1878-1884 > 1878 St.George Lane Fox (GB) u. Thomas Alva Edison (US) entwickeln erste Pläne zur kollektiven Verteilung des Stromes in ganze Stadtteile, die im Jahre 1881 in Godalming (GB) und ein Jahr später in New York (US) ihre erste Anwendung finden [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de
  • Energy Infrastructure Projects in the Baltic Sea

    Energy Infrastructure Projects in the Baltic Sea

    FACTS ISSUE 2 | 06 – 2007 FACTS ABOUT THE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE ACROSS THE BALTIC SEA ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE BALTIC SEA ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES CAN BE numerous rivers that flow into the sea. Historically, COPED WITH the main challenge for infrastructure projects has therefore been to maintain this balance. Nord Stream is only one of several planned or already operating energy infrastructure projects Energy infrastructure projects like pipelines, wind in the Baltic Sea. In addition to the pipeline from farms and submarine power cables are in general Vyborg to Greifswald, further offshore natural gas smaller than infrastructure projects like bridges, pipelines across the Baltic Sea are under consid- tunnels and harbours. However, the energy projects eration: Poland is interested in a connection from stretch over longer distances and it may therefore Denmark across the Baltic Sea (Baltic Pipe), while be necessary to cross sensitive areas, like munitions Estonia and Finland are also planning a connecting dump sites. pipeline across the sea (Balticconnector). Further- more, subsea power cables and several offshore All use of the sea has an impact; this includes energy wind parks already exist or are planned in the infrastructure as well as ship traffic or traffic infra- Baltic Sea. All of these projects are striving to keep structure. One of the reasons for choosing locations their impact on the environment as low as possible in the sea instead of onshore is the availability of and to preserve the Baltic ecosystem as it is. “Nord space, which is becoming a scarce resource. In this Stream: Facts” talked to Per Jørgensen, a leading context, the impact of large diameter pipelines like international expert in the field of infrastructure, Nord Stream is almost the same as smaller pipeline energy and environment about these projects.
  • Det Här Underlaget För Tidigt Samråd För Kriegers Flak Är Framtaget Av Sweden Offshore Wind AB Som Ingår Numera I Vattenfall-Koncernen

    Det Här Underlaget För Tidigt Samråd För Kriegers Flak Är Framtaget Av Sweden Offshore Wind AB Som Ingår Numera I Vattenfall-Koncernen

    Det här underlaget för tidigt samråd för Kriegers flak är framtaget av Sweden Offshore Wind AB som ingår numera i Vattenfall-koncernen. 1. Bakgrund och syfte......................................................................................................... 1 2. Presentation av företaget ................................................................................................ 2 3. Lokalisering och utformning av transformatorstationerna............................................. 3 4. Lokalisering och utformning av sjökablarna.................................................................. 5 5. Beskrivning av berörda områden till havs och vid kusten ............................................. 6 6. Beskrivning av de identifierade landningspunkterna................................................... 10 7. Beskrivning av projektets olika faser........................................................................... 15 8. Fysisk påverkan på omgivningen och konsekvenser av påverkan............................... 16 9. Alternativa lokaliseringar............................................................................................. 23 10. Alternativ utformning............................................................................................... 23 11. Nollalternativ............................................................................................................ 24 12. Kontaktuppgifter ...................................................................................................... 24 1. Bakgrund
  • Uniper and Fortum

    Uniper and Fortum

    FORTUM – For a cleaner world Investor / Analyst material April 2018 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. Any references to the future represent the management’s current best understanding. However the final outcome may differ from them. 2 Content Fortum today 4 – 18 European and Nordic power markets 19 – 26 Fortum’s nuclear fleet 27 – 30 Russia 31 – 33 Thermal capacity in Russia 33 Historical achieved prices 34 Interim Report Q1 2018 35 – 55 Uniper investment 56 – 59 IR contacts 60 3 Appr. 130,000 shareholders • Power and heat company in the Nordic Finnish households countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltics 10.3% Financial and • Listed at the Helsinki Stock Exchange insurance institutions 1.4% since 1998 Other Finnish • Among the most traded shares on investors the Nasdaq Helsinki stock exchange 7.5% Finnish • Market cap ~16 billion euros State 50.8% Foreign investors 30.0% 28 February 2018 4 Capital returns: 2017 EUR 1.10 per share ~ EUR 1 billion Fortum’s dividend policy is based on 5 year dividend per share (EUR) history the following preconditions: • The dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported 1,4 1.3 by the company’s long-term strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. 1,2 1.1 0.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 • When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors 1,0 1.1 looks at a range of factors, including the macro 0,8 environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans.
  • For a Cleaner World

    For a Cleaner World

    Equity story of FORTUM – For a cleaner world Investor / Analyst material July 2021 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. Any references to the future represent the management’s current best understanding. However the final outcome may differ from them. 2 Content Fortum in brief 4 – 12 Fortum’s strategy 13 – 22 Energy market transition 23 – 27 Interim report Q1 2021 28 – 45 Appendices 46 European and Nordic power markets 47 – 56 Fortum’s Nordic power generation in detail 57 Fortum’s evolution and strategic route 58 Historical achieved prices 59 Dividend 60 IR contact 61 3 Fortum in brief Fortum in brief Power generation assets Key figures 20201 Sales EUR 49.0 bn Comparable EBITDA EUR 2.4 bn Total assets EUR 57.8 bn Personnel 19,933 Main businesses1 Sales (€) Volume2 Capacity India Power 20.8 bn 142 TWh 50.3 GW Gas 22.4 bn ~370 TWh 7.6 bcm3 Heat 0.8 bn 30 TWh 19.5 GW 1) Until 31 of March 2020 Uniper's contribution to the income statement was recognised in the Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures. 2) For Power - Power generation, for Gas - Long-term gas supply contracts and for Heat – Heat production 3) Gas storage capacity, billion cubic meters 4 Fortum in brief Strong position to drive the energy transition in Europe 3rd largest 3rd largest 3rd largest 4th largest power generator CO2-free power generator nuclear generator gas storage operator in Europe and Russia in Europe in Europe in Europe 5 TWh 6 ConsolidatedFortum is third thelargest CO Europe 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 EPH incl.