Emergency Landings FTW-17A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

FTW-17A Emergency Landings READING ASSIGNMENT AFH Pages 17-1 to 17-7 – “Emergency Situations” through “Emergency Descents” Study Questions 1. Who or what is the ultimate authority in what procedures to be used in the event of an inflight emergency? a) The Airplane Flying Handbook. b) The designated FAA-examiner. c) The pilot operating handbook (POH) for that aircraft. 2. Define the following terms: forced landing ____________________________________________________ precautionary landing ____________________________________________________ ditching ____________________________________________________ 3. What could cause a pilot to decide not to make a precautionary landing when one is advisable or necessary? a) Wishful thinking. b) Emergency procedures in the POH. c) Lack of a certificate or rating. 4. What is one way that a pilot’s reluctance to accept an emergency situation can result in an avoidable tragedy? a) Prompt establishment of gliding airspeed can result in an avoidable delay in the descent. b) The pilot’s delaying of the inevitable may cause acceptable landing areas to be overflown. c) Planning the approach off airport can unnecessarily delay the pilot’s ability to correctly reestablish fuel flow to the engine. FTW-17A 141 Emergency Landings 5. Select the answers below that make the statements true. In some situations, the pilot could unintentionally increase / decrease the danger to himself and his passengers by placing too little / much emphasis on trying to save the aircraft from damage. Simulated forced / short-field landing practice only in areas with safe landing procedures / areas could lead the pilot to try to avoid touchdown in terrain where airplane damage is unexpected / unavoidable. Examples of this include attempting an impossible turn back to the runway with insufficient altitude / airspeed, or choosing a landing area that affords no margin for error. Two factors that can increase this error are the pilot’s financial stake / prior time in the aircraft, and the belief that an undamaged airplane implies no bodily harm. There are times, however, when the pilot should choose to defend / sacrifice the airplane so that the occupants can safely walk away from the landing. 6. Avoidance of crash injuries is largely a matter of a) protecting the wings and flight control surfaces from damage or impact. b) keeping the passenger cabin relatively intact by using expendable structure such as wings and landing gear to slow the deceleration of the aircraft upon impact. c) choosing to make sudden stops instead of prolonging the deceleration process during an off-airport landing. 7. Why are seat belts and shoulder straps critical to maintaining bodily security in the event of a forced landing? a) The human body must be decelerated at the same rate as the surrounding fuselage in order to benefit from the fuselage’s relative intactness. b) Seat belts and shoulder harnesses provide a psychological feeling of safety and security. c) The seat belts are made of material that will yield during landings in which it is safer for the body to be thrown free of the airplane. 8. What are examples of things that should be used to absorb the energy of the aircraft in a crash landing? a) The fuselage. b) Cultivated fields with dense crops, brush and small trees. c) Rocks, or craggy mountainous outcroppings. 9. Select the answers below that make the statements true. A critical error to be avoided in planning and executing an emergency landing is the loss of initiative over the airplane’s attitude/electrical system and sink rate/mayday broadcast at touchdown. Steep/Shallow bank angles just before touchdown should also be avoided, as they increase the stalling speed. An excessive nose-low/nose-high pitch attitude brings the risk of “sticking” the nose in the ground. A flat touchdown at a high/low sink rate on a hard surface can be injurious. 142 Emergency Landings 10. In general, which of the following would be the best attitude for the airplane in execution of an emergency landing? a) Nose-low pitch attitude. b) Steep bank angles. c) Wings level, nose level (or slightly high). 11. What should be the ideal vertical sink rate on touchdown in an emergency landing? a) A flat touchdown with a high sink rate to provide greater surface friction and deceleration. b) High sink rates, but only on soft terrain; otherwise, low sink rates. c) A minimal sink rate. 12. A well-executed crash landing in poor terrain can be less hazardous than a) a well-executed normal landing on an established field. b) an uncontrolled touchdown on an established field. c) a soft-field landing on a dirt runway. 13. How should flaps be used during final approach in an emergency landing? a) Flaps should be deployed as early in the approach as possible to increase drag and slow the aircraft. b) Flaps should never be used in an emergency landing. c) Flaps should be used to improve maneuverability at slow airspeeds, but pilots should exercise caution in the timing and extent of their application. 14. What advantage of the use of flaps in a normal landing can create a hazard in an engine-out, emergency ? landing if not properly managed? a) Increased angle of descent. b) Increased airspeed on final approach. c) Reduced deceleration as a result of aerodynamic drag. 15. Why might a gear-up landing on a plowed field result in less damage to the aircraft than a gear-down landing? a) The plowed furrows can raise the nose of the airplane and prevent the propeller from striking the surface. b) Landing gear are less able to support the weight of the aircraft than the bottom of the fuselage. c) Landing gear could catch unevenly and flip the aircraft, and collapsed landing gear can contribute to fuel tank rupture. 16. How should a pilot of an irregularly running engine manage the engine operation in a forced landing? a) Unless the engine is operating fully, it should be shut down at the first indication that an emergency FTW-17A landing is imminent. b) Any engine power is better than no engine power, so leave it running. c) Exploit the power available but switch the engine and fuel off just before touchdown. 143 Emergency Landings 17. Experience shows that a collision with ground obstacles at the end of a ground roll, is much less hazardous than striking an obstacle before the touchdown point is reached. a) True. b) False. 18. Why would a river or creek be an inviting alternative for an emergency landing? a) The riverbed is often relatively level, soft ground with open area above. b) Water decelerates the airplane faster than landing on dry pavement. c) The water can be used to wash the airplane after the crash landing. 19. Why should a pilot making an emergency landing on a road or across a road be on heightened alert? ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 20. When making a landing into trees, the pilot should try to “hang” the airplane in the tree branches by a) making a slightly faster than normal approach and keeping the nose level or slightly down. b) using the fuselage to absorb the main impact and protecting the wings for flight. c) keeping the groundspeed as low as possible and keeping the nose high. 21. What can result when landing on snow or ditching over a wide expanse of smooth water? a) Loss of depth perception and errors in landing. b) Increased visibility. c) Loss of rudder effectiveness. 22. On takeoff, when altitudes are below 500 feet AGL, an engine failure should result in the pilot a) making a 180° turn back to the runway. b) establishing the proper glide attitude, and landing directly ahead or slightly to either side of the takeoff path. c) making a slight turn downwind to gain airspeed for landing. 23. The goal of an emergency descent is to a) maintain altitude for as long as possible. b) lose altitude as rapidly as possible. c) glide the farthest distance possible. 24. Name a situation that would demand an emergency descent. ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 144 Emergency Landings 25. Why are simulated emergency descents made in a turn? a) To minimize load factor on the airframe. b) To improve radio reception. c) To check for other air traffic below and to look for possible landing areas (and reduce the vertical component of lift for a faster descent). 26. Except when prohibited by the aircraft manufacturer, the power setting in an emergency descent should be a) full throttle. b) normal power setting for high-speed cruise flight. c) idle. 27. The airspeed selected for emergency descent should be a) VA. b) VLE. c) the maximum allowable airspeed consistent with the aircraft configuration and air conditions. 28. Why would a pilot choose a high airspeed emergency descent in the event of an engine fire? a) To descend quickly to a region of increased air density. b) A high airspeed descent could blow out the fire. c) High airspeed descents should NEVER be used in the event of an engine fire. 29. What actions should the pilot perform just before touchdown during a forced landing? a) Protect passengers from impact with spare clothing, cushions, or soft luggage. b) Move passengers to rear seats to create a more favorable center of gravity at touchdown.” c) Recline seatbacks to prevent back and neck injuries. 30. Seat belts and shoulder harnesses should be worn a) loose fitting to provide freedom of movement inside the cabin. b) loose to provide an air gap when decelerating a body during forced landing. c) low and tight to prevent body motion during forced landing deceleration. FTW-17A 145 Emergency Landings Answers to Study Questions 1. c 12.
Recommended publications
  • Comment Response Document

    Comment Response Document

    EASA SC-VTOL-01 Comment Response Document Note: The comments have been grouped by theme or objective and renumbered sequentially. Bookmarks are available to navigate the document. General type of vehicle Explanatory Note 1: type of vehicle The Special Condition (SC) has been developed to cover a new category of person-carrying vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) heavier-than-air aircraft with lift/thrust units used to generate powered lift and control. The vertical take-off and landing capability distinguishes this type of aircraft from aeroplanes. The Special Condition does not intend to cover traditional rotorcraft either but rather aircraft with distributed lift/thrust and it will be clarified that, for the SC to be applicable, more than 2 lift/thrust units should be used to provide lift during vertical take-off or landing. The Special Condition background mentioned “the aircraft may not be able to perform an autorotation or a controlled glide in the event of a loss of lift/thrust” as it is the case for some VTOL aircraft being proposed, however this is not a requirement. Comment Comment summary Suggested resolution Comment is an Comment is EASA EASA response observation or substantive or comment is a is an NR Author Paragraph Page disposition suggestion* objection** 1 1David Loebl, Background/Sc 1 “Although hover flight may be possible, the aircraft Clarify the condition where no glide is possible: Yes No Noted See Explanatory Note 1 AutoFlightX ope may not be able to perform an autorotation or a “…not be able to perform an autorotation or a controlled glide in the event of a loss of lift/thrust.” controlled glide in the event of a loss of lift/thrust implies that the given SC are not applicable for during hover.” transition vehicles that can fly also with aerodynamic lift.
  • FTW-8G Emergency Approach and Landing

    FTW-8G Emergency Approach and Landing

    FTW-8G Emergency Approach and Landing READING ASSIGNMENT Pilot’s Operating Handbook, Emergency Procedures, Engine Failures AFH Pages 8-26 to 8-27 – “Emergency Approaches and Landings (Simulated)” Study Questions Pilot’s Operating Handbook, Emergency Procedures, Engine Failures 1. In the Emergency Procedures section of a POH, what is typically indicated by emergency procedure steps FTW-8G ? that are shown in boldface type? a) The steps should be memorized. b) The steps are optional. c) Additional information regarding those steps is contained in the amplified procedures section of the POH. 2. Why are the emergency procedures for dealing with an engine failure just after takeoff different from the procedures for dealing with an engine failure in flight? a) The best glide airspeeds are significantly different and result in very different glide angles. b) Engine failures at altitude may allow time for restart procedures to be attempted. c) If the wheels have not stopped spinning from the takeoff roll, the aerodynamics of the forced landing will be substantially different. 3. When responding to an engine failure immediately after takeoff, or for any forced landing, why is it a good idea to shutdown and secure the engine prior to landing? a) Having the engine on limits the effectiveness of flaps and ailerons. b) To reduce the possibility of a post-crash fire. c) To reserve some fuel for future takeoffs, if needed. 4. When should the airplane’s avionics and electrical system be shut down during a forced landing? a) Once landing is assured. b) Prior to squawking 7700 on the transponder.
  • National Transportation Safety Board

    National Transportation Safety Board

    ,oc ITSB'. ~MM :o 18 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD U.S. GENERAL AVIATION 1978 NTSB-AMM-80-8 >C rss llM , UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATIO~ PAGE 1. Report No. I 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AMM-80;...8 4. Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Briefs of Accidents, Involving Corporate/Executive August 5, 1980 Aircraft, U.S. General Aviation, 1978 6.Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) E.Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. Bureau of Technology 3021 National Transportation Safety Board 11 .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 13.Type of Report and Period Cove red 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Accident Reports in Brief Format - U.S. General Aviation Corporate/Executive NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Aircraft, 1978 Washington, D. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes 16.Abstract This publication contains reports of U.S. general aviation corporate/ executive aircraft accidents occurring in 1978. Included are 87 accident Briefs, 23 of which involve fatal accidents. The brief format presents the facts, conditions, circumstances and probable cause(s) for each accident. Additional statistical information is tabulated by type of accident, phase of operation, injuries and causal/factor(s). This publication will be published annually. 17 ·Key Words Aviation accidents, corporate/executive 18.Distribution Statement aircraft, U.S. general aviation, probable cause, This document is available type of accident, phase of operation, kind of to the public through the flying, aircraft damage, injuries, p~lot data. National Technical Infor­ mation Service, Spring­ field, Virginia 22151 19.Security Classification 20.Security Classification 21 .No.
  • Dead-Stick Landing Ice Crystals Cause Dual Flameout

    Dead-Stick Landing Ice Crystals Cause Dual Flameout

    ONRecord Dead-Stick Landing Ice crystals cause dual flameout. BY MARK LACAGNINA The following information provides an aware- unsuccessfully to restart the engines using bat- ness of problems in the hope that they can be tery power. Descending through FL 260, the avoided in the future. The information is based crew increased airspeed to 230 kt to attempt a on final reports by official investigative authori- windmill restart, but there was no indication of ties on aircraft accidents and incidents. engine rotation. “During the descent, ATC provided vectors JETS to the ILS [instrument landing system] approach to Runway 7 at Jacksonville,” the report said. No Training or Guidance on Hazard “The flight was in clouds during the descent, Raytheon Beechjet 400A. Minor damage. No injuries. with moderate to heavy rain beginning at about he Beechjet was on a fractional ownership 10,000 ft. As the airplane neared the airport, operation positioning flight from Indianapolis ATC provided continuous callouts of the dis- Tto Marco Island, Florida, U.S., the afternoon tance remaining to the runway that the pilots of Nov. 28, 2005. The airplane had been flown at later stated was very helpful in managing their Flight Level 400 (approximately 40,000 ft) for 30 descent and approach to the airport.” minutes and at FL 380 for about 15 minutes when The captain assumed control at about 9,000 the flight crew received clearance from air traffic ft. The landing gear was extended manually, and control (ATC) for further descent to FL 330. the Beechjet broke out of the clouds at about “The flight was operating in visual meteoro- 1,200 ft.
  • WEC Aircraft Use and Safety Handbook

    WEC Aircraft Use and Safety Handbook

    AIRCRAFT USE AND SAFETY HANDBOOK FOR SCIENTISTS AND RESOURCE MANAGERS John C. Simon Peter C. Frederick Kenneth D. Meyer H. Percival Franklin DEVELOPED BY THE © University of Florida 2010 ABOUT THE AUTHORS John Charles Simon is a Research Coordinator for the University of Florida’s South Florida Wading Bird Project. He earned his private pilot’s certificate in 1986 and has flown over 750 hours as a passenger/observer in both fixed- winged and rotary aircraft conducting population and nesting surveys, habitat evaluations, following flights, and radio telemetry. Dr. Peter Frederick is a Research Professor in the University of Florida’s Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation. His research on wading birds in the Florida Everglades has used aerial survey techniques extensively and intensively, with over 1,500 hours flown in fixed-winged and rotary aircraft over 25 years. He survived one air crash in a Cessna 172 during the course of that work. Dr. Kenneth D. Meyer is Director of the Avian Research and Conservation Institute and an Associate Professor (Courtesy) in the University of Florida's Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation. Since 1981, Dr. Meyer's research on birds has involved fixed-wing and rotary aircraft for radio telemetry, population surveys, roost counts, nest finding, and following flights. Dr. H. Percival Franklin is Courtesy Associate Professor and Unit Leader of the Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Its employees and cooperators, regardless of employment, are bound by strict aircraft training and use regulations of the Department of Interior. Dr Franklin has been a strong proponent of aircraft and other safety issues in the workplace.
  • Helicopters Chapter 1

    Helicopters Chapter 1

    Annex to ED Decision 2012/018/R Section 2 - Helicopters Chapter 1 - General requirements GM1 CAT.POL.H.105(c)(3)(ii)(A) General REPORTED HEADWIND COMPONENT The reported headwind component should be interpreted as being that reported at the time of flight planning and may be used, provided there is no significant change of unfactored wind prior to take-off. GM1 CAT.POL.H.110(a)(2)(i) Obstacle accountability COURSE GUIDANCE Standard course guidance includes automatic direction finder (ADF) and VHF omnidirectional radio range (VOR) guidance. Accurate course guidance includes ILS, MLS or other course guidance providing an equivalent navigational accuracy. Chapter 2 – Performance class 1 GM1 CAT.POL.H.200&CAT.POL.H.300&CAT.POL.H.400 General CATEGORY A AND CATEGORY B (a) Helicopters that have been certified according to any of the following standards are considered to satisfy the Category A criteria. Provided that they have the necessary performance information scheduled in the AFM, such helicopters are therefore eligible for performance class 1 or 2 operations: (1) certification as Category A under CS-27 or CS-29; (2) certification as Category A under JAR-27 or JAR-29; (3) certification as Category A under FAR Part 29; (4) certification as group A under BCAR Section G; and (5) certification as group A under BCAR-29. (b) In addition to the above, certain helicopters have been certified under FAR Part 27 and with compliance with FAR Part 29 engine isolation requirements as specified in FAA Advisory Circular AC 27-1. Provided that compliance
  • LANDING Av1at1on Safety Digest Is Prepared by the Department of Transport and Communications and Is Published by the Australtan Government Publishing Service

    LANDING Av1at1on Safety Digest Is Prepared by the Department of Transport and Communications and Is Published by the Australtan Government Publishing Service

    0 ' 0 ASD 134 SPRING 1987 0 LANDING Av1at1on Safety Digest is prepared by the Department of Transport and Communications and is published by the Australtan Government Publishing Service. It is distributed to Aus tralian licence holders (except student pilots). Contents registered aircraft owners and certain other Editorial persons and organisations having an operational interest in safety within the Aus· tra/1an civil aviation envlfonment. 4 Spring is in the air Flying has its ups and downs D1stnbutees who expenence delivery - especially in the Spring. problems or who wish to notify a change of address should contact: The Publications Distribution Officer (EPSD) Department of Transport and Communicat10ns 6 Afterthoughts? P 0. Box 1986, Carlton South. Vic. 3053, A safe flight is nicely finished off by a post-flight AUSTRALIA T'S SPRING at last. The birds are singing and it's time for us inspection. Telephone (03) 667 2733 to get back into the air after the winter lay-off. Most of us have just been through our leanest period of aviating for the year and we may be more than a little rusty. Our Covers familiarity with the aircraft and its systems, with procedures and Front. When the going gets tough ... the 7 The power of nature checks is at its lowest ebb. Our handling techniques - the vis­ Av1at1on Safety Digest is also available on tough get going. A major element in Thunderstorms deserve respect ual judgments and control inputs - are less automatic and may subscription from the Australian Government landing accidents is a late decision to go Publishing Service.
  • Chapter 11 Transition to Complex Airplanes

    Chapter 11 Transition to Complex Airplanes

    Chapter 11 Transition to Complex Airplanes Introduction A high-performance airplane is defined as an airplane with an engine capable of developing more than 200 horsepower. A complex airplane is an airplane that has a retractable landing gear, flaps, and a controllable pitch propeller. In lieu of a controllable pitch propeller, the aircraft could also have an engine control system consisting of a digital computer and associated accessories for controlling the engine and the propeller. A seaplane would still be considered complex if it meets the description above except for having floats instead of a retractable landing gear system. 11-1 i ii Tapered Delta Sweptback Figure 11-1. Airfoil types. Transition to a complex airplane, or a high-performance axis. Wing flaps acts symmetrically about the longitudinal airplane, can be demanding for most pilots without previous axis producing no rolling moment; however, both lift and drag experience. Increased performance and complexity both increase as well as a pitching moment about the lateral axis. require additional planning, judgment, and piloting skills. Lift is a function of several variables including air density, Transition to these types of airplanes, therefore, should be velocity, surface area, and lift coefficient. Since flaps increase accomplished in a systematic manner through a structured an airfoil’s lift coefficient, lift is increased. [Figure 11-3] course of training administered by a qualified flight instructor. As flaps are deflected, the aircraft may pitch nose up, nose Airplanes can be designed to fly through a wide range of down or have minimal changes in pitch attitude. Pitching airspeeds. High speed flight requires smaller wing areas and moment is caused by the rearward movement of the moderately cambered airfoils whereas low speed flight is wing’s center of pressure; however, that pitching behavior obtained with airfoils with a greater camber and larger wing depends on several variables including flap type, wing area.
  • ACCIDENT to SOCATA MS880B at EBUL on 14 APRIL 2012 Safety

    ACCIDENT to SOCATA MS880B at EBUL on 14 APRIL 2012 Safety

    Air Accident Investigation Unit - (Belgium) CCN Rue du Progrès 80 Bte 5 1030 Brussels Safety Investigation Report ACCIDENT TO SOCATA MS880B AT EBUL ON 14 APRIL 2012 REF. AAIU-2011-23 ISSUE DATE: 09 DECEMBER 2011 STATUS: DRAFT FINAL Ref. AAIU-2012-07 Issue date: 05FOREWORD July 2013 ........................................................................................................ 3 Status: Final AAIU-2012-07-EBUL SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................... 4 1 FACTUAL INFORMATION. ........................................................................... 5 1.1 HISTORY OF FLIGHT. ................................................................................ 5 1.2 INJURIES PERSONS. ................................................................................. 5 1.3 DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT.............................................................................. 5 1.4 OTHER DAMAGE. ...................................................................................... 5 1.5 PERSONNEL INFORMATION. ...................................................................... 5 1.6 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION. .......................................................................... 6 1.7 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS. ............................................................... 7 1.8 AIDS TO NAVIGATION. ............................................................................... 7 1.9 COMMUNICATION. ...................................................................................
  • Section 3 Emergency Procedures

    Section 3 Emergency Procedures

    TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 3 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES Paragraph Page o. No. 3.1 General 3-1 3.3 Emergency Procedure' Check List 3-3 Engine Fire During Start 3-3 Engine Power loss During Takeoff. J-3 Engine Power Loss In Flight 3-3 Power Off Landing 3-3 Fire In Flight 3-3 Loss Of Oil Pre 'sure 3-3 Loss Of Fuel Pressure 3-4 High Oil Temperature 3-4 Alternator Failure 3-4 Spin Recovery 3-4 Open Door. .................................................................. .. 3-4 Carburetor Icing 3-4 Engine Roughnes 3-4 3.5 Amplified Emergency Procedure' (General) 3-7 3.7 EngineFireDuring tart 3-7 3.9 Engine Power Lo s During Takeoff. 3-7 3.11 Engine Power Los In Flight 3-8 3.13 Power Off Landing 3-8 3.15 Fire In Flight , 3-9 .. 17 Loss Of Oil Pressure 3-9 3.19 La Of FueJ Pressure 3-10 3.21 High Oil Temperature 3-10 3.23 Alternator Failure 3-10 3.25 Spin Reco ery 3-10 3.27 Open Door 3-11 3.28 Carburetor lein l! ......................•........................................... 3-11 3.29 Engine Roughne s 3-11 REPORT: VB-790 3-i PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORAnON SECfION3 PA·28-181, CHEROKEE ARCHER II EMERGENCY PROCEDURES SECTION 3 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 3.1 GENERAL The recommended procedure. for coping with ariou types of emergencie and critical situations are provided by this section. All of required (FAA regulations) emergency procedure and tho e necessary for the operation of the airplane as determined b the operating and de ign features of the airplane are presented.
  • Cessna 152 Checklist Preflight

    Cessna 152 Checklist Preflight

    Cessna 152 Checklist Preflight CABIN 1. Check Discrepancies and Inspections 2. Required Papers in Airplane (AROW) 2. Enter HOBBS Reading on TACH Sheet 3. Control Wheel Lock . REMOVE 4. Ignition Switch . OFF 5. Master Switch . ON 6. Fuel Gauges . QUANTITY 7. Flaps . 30° 8. Master Switch . OFF 9. Fuel Shutoff Valve . ON 2) FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE 1. Fuel Drain . DRAIN 2. Fuselage/Empennage . CHECK CONDITION 3. Rudder Gust Lock . REMOVE 4. Tail Tie-down . DISCONNECT 5. Control Surfaces . CHECK Attachment and Movement 6. Empennage/Fuselage. CHECK CONDITION 3) RIGHT WING TRAILING EDGE 1. Flap . CHECK Attachment and Movement 2. Aileron . CHECK Attachment, Movement, and Counterweights 4) RIGHT WING 1. Wing Tie Down . .DISCONNECT 2. Undercarriage/Tire . CHECK Condition, Inflation, and Brakes 3. Fuel Drain . DRAIN 4. Fuel Quantity . DIP/MEASURE 5. Fuel Filler Cap . SECURE (Check Vent) NIGHT PREFLIGHT 6. Wing Surface . CHECK CONDITION 1. Master Switch . ON 7. Windshield………………..CLEAN 2. Beacon/Strobes . TEST 5) NOSE 3. NAV Lights . TEST 1. Engine Oil Level . 4-6 QUARTS 4. Landing Light . TEST 2. Fuel Sump . DRAIN 5. Interior Lights . TEST 3. Prop/Spinner . CONDITION 6. Master Switch . OFF 4. Alternator Belt . TIGHT 5. Oil Cooler . UNOBSTRUCTED 6. Landing Light…………….CLEAN 7. Air Filter . UNOBSTRUCTED 8. Wheel Strut/Tire . CHECK Condition and Inflation 9. Static Port . UNRESTRICTED 6) LEFT WING 1. Fuel Quantity . DIP/MEASURE 2. Fuel Filler Cap . SECURE (Check Vent) 3. Pitot Tube . UNRESTRICTED/CLEAR 4. Fuel Tank Vent . CLEAR 5. Wing Tie Down . DISCONNECT 6. Stall Warning . OPERATION 7. Wing Surface . CHECK CONDITION 7) LEFT WING TRAILING EDGE 1.
  • Safety WORLD SAVING LIVES, SAVING MONEY SAFETY ROI

    Safety WORLD SAVING LIVES, SAVING MONEY SAFETY ROI

    AeroSafety WORLD SAVING LIVES, SAVING MONEY SAFETY ROI MASTERING COMPLEXITY Keeping pace with automation UNHAPPY ENDING Overrun at Jackson Hole TRAINING FOR SURPRISES Lessons from Air France 447 RETURN TO SENDER Radar for weather awareness THE JOURNAL OF FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION SEPTEMBER 2012 PRESIDENT’SMESSAGE THE FOURTH Estate was winding down from engagement in an- Another reason we engage with journalists other flurry of news media stories, and think- is to advance views that are critical to the crimi- ing that many of our members probably don’t nalization issue and data protection. We focused understand Flight Safety Foundation’s relation- world attention on those subjects following the Iship with reporters, or are not even aware of all Gol mid-air in Brazil, the Concorde trial and the the things we do with the media. 15-year Air Inter prosecution. We also have been One big reason the Foundation engages ag- very vocal about rulings in Italy that have directly gressively with the media is to give safety profes- interfered with accident investigations. sionals the room they need to do their jobs. Today, Finally, we often engage with the media be- there is no shortage of people who understand cause we need to help them get the story right, or safety, but these people endure a lot of interfer- correct it when it is wrong. Following the tragic ence from politicians, judges and policymakers. crash that killed high-ranking members of the Pol- When an aviation safety event finds its way into the ish government in 2010, we had endless conversa- public spotlight, these politicians are compelled to tions with the Russian and Polish media, helping respond.