DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) SCOPING MEETING FOR PHASE II OF THE MID-ATLANTIC POWER PATHWAY (MAPP) TRANSMISSION PROJECT MARCH 23, 2011 Location: Cambridge-South Dorchester High School 2475 Maple Dam Road Cambridge, Maryland 21613 (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 2 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 (BEGAN AT 7:02 P.M.) 3 MR. BOREN: Good evening. On behalf of the 4 Department of Energy (DOE) Loan Programs Office, I 5 would like to welcome all of you tonight. 6 This is the Environmental Scoping Meeting for 7 Phase II of the proposed Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 8 (MAPP) transmission line project. The project is being 9 proposed by Pepco Holdings, Incorporation 10 (PHI). 11 Let the record show that the public scoping 12 meeting began at 7:02 on March 23, 2011. My name is 13 Doug Boren and I am the DOE National Environmental 14 Policy Act (NEPA) Document Manager for Phase II of the 15 MAPP project. Greg Netti, sitting beside me, is from 16 Ecology and Environment, which is DOE's third-party 17 contractor assisting with the preparation of the 18 Environmental Impact Statement(EIS). Sharon Thomas, 19 also with DOE, is at the sign-in table where you came 20 in. There is also a team from Ecology and Environment 21 here tonight. 22 We are here tonight because the Department of (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 3 1 Energy Loan Programs Office is considering a federal 2 loan guarantee to PHI for Phase II of the proposed MAPP 3 project. The loan guarantee program was established by 4 the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Title 17 of the Act 5 identified discrete categories of projects that are 6 eligible for loan guarantees. These categories include 7 advanced transmission and distribution technologies 8 that constitute new or significantly improved 9 technologies. 10 In order to receive a loan guarantee from the 11 Loan Programs Office, applicants and projects need to 12 meet certain financial and technical criteria. The 13 financial criteria help us meet our statutory 14 requirement that the federal government have a 15 reasonable assurance of repayments. These are loans 16 guarantees. These are not grants. 17 There are also criteria to ensure that the 18 technology is not only new or significantly improved, 19 but that it is also commercially viable. Phase II of 20 the MAPP project would incorporate new smart grid 21 technology that includes a high-voltage, direct-current 22 system; microprocessor-based relays; digital fault (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 4 1 recorders, and phasor measurement units. The smart grid 2 technology to be incorporated by the MAPP project would 3 promote the transmission of energy over the line more 4 efficiently. 5 DOE is the lead federal agency for the NEPA 6 review of the project and the lead agency for the 7 preparation of the EIS. We have requested the U.S. 8 Army Corps of Engineers to participate in the 9 preparation of the EIS to satisfy their NEPA 10 responsibilities under Section 404 of the Clean Water 11 Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. We 12 also expect the Environmental Protection Agency to be a 13 cooperating agency. 14 The purpose of tonight's meeting is to 15 provide each of you with an opportunity to give us your 16 environmental comments on Phase II of the proposed MAPP 17 project. We are here tonight to learn from you. It 18 will help us the most if your comments are as specific 19 as possible regarding the potential environmental 20 impacts and reasonable alternatives of the proposed 21 project. Your comments will be used to help determine 22 what issues we need to cover in the (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 5 1 EIS. 2 If you wish to speak tonight, please be sure 3 to sign the speakers' list at the sign-in table. If 4 you do not wish to speak tonight but would like to make 5 a written comment, you can pick up one of the handouts 6 at the sign-in table and write your comments and submit 7 them this evening or send the written comments to us. 8 On March 4, 2011, we issued a Notice of 9 Intent to prepare an EIS for this project. The scoping 10 comment period officially ends on April 4, 2011. We 11 will take comments throughout our review of the 12 project; however, we ask that you provide comments as 13 soon as possible in order to give us time to analyze 14 and research the issues. 15 During our review of the project, we will 16 assemble information from a variety of sources 17 including the applicant; you, the public; other state, 18 local, and federal agencies; and our own independent 19 analysis. We will analyze this information and prepare 20 a draft EIS that will be distributed to the public for 21 comments. 22 If you want a copy of the draft EIS, you can (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 6 1 submit a written comment to DOE requesting a copy. It 2 is very important that any comments you send include 3 the DOE/EIS number for the project. The EIS number is 4 in the Notice of Intent, but let me also give it to you 5 now so you can write it down. It's DOE/EIS-0465. 6 One more time: That's DOE/EIS-0465. 7 If you decide to send us a comment letter, 8 please put the EIS number on it, and this will insure 9 that we get your comments. 10 After the draft EIS is issued, you will have 11 45 days to review and comment on it. We will schedule 12 a public comment meeting similar in format to this one 13 sometime within the 45-day comment period on the draft 14 EIS. At that meeting you can give us your comments on 15 the draft EIS orally. Alternatively, you may provide 16 comments in writing. At the end of the 45-day comment 17 period, we will use your comments and any new 18 information that we have about the project to finalize 19 the EIS. 20 After the final EIS is issued, DOE will use 21 the information in the EIS to issue a Record of 22 Decision. The Record of Decision announces and (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 7 1 explains DOE's decision and describes any commitments 2 for mitigating potential environmental impacts. 3 Before we start taking comments tonight from 4 you this evening, I will give you a brief presentation 5 about the NEPA process, and the applicant will make a 6 short presentation about the project proposal. 7 A copy of the NEPA process presentation is 8 available on the sign-in table. This is just a quick 9 outline of the presentation. I will go over the NEPA 10 process for an EIS, and I have some additional 11 information with websites where you can follow up. 12 The first step in the EIS process is the 13 Notice of Intent. The Notice of Intent was published 14 March 4th. The Notice of Intent states the need for 15 the action and provides preliminary information on the 16 EIS scope including the alternative actions to be 17 evaluated and environmental impacts to be analyzed. 18 With the release of the NOI, it starts the scoping 19 process. This is the period in which DOE requests 20 comments from the public on the scope of the EIS; for 21 example, alternatives to be evaluated, environmental 22 impacts to be analyzed, resource areas to consider, and (866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2011 Capital Reporting Company Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway 03-23-2011 8 1 possible issues. It is important to ID the issues now 2 before we draft the EIS. This process lasts 30 days 3 with at least one public scoping meeting. 4 The next step in the EIS NEPA process is the 5 draft EIS. DOE considers the scoping comments to 6 prepare the draft EIS. The draft EIS includes a 7 comparison of various alternatives including the no- 8 action alternative. When the draft EIS is released to 9 the public, the public may comment on the draft EIS. 10 The comment period lasts at least 45 days. As 11 previously stated, we will have a meeting similar to 12 this one in order to take comments on the draft EIS. 13 The next step in the EIS NEPA process is the 14 final EIS. DOE considers all timely public comments on 15 the draft EIS and incorporates responses into the final 16 EIS. At this time DOE will identify the preferred 17 alternative.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background
    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • This Land Is Whose Land?
    This Land Is Whose Land? Author: Mary Davis, Anne Arundel County Public Schools Grade Level: Upper Elementary Duration: One 90 minute class (or two 1 hour classes) Overview: In the latter half of the 17 th century, the expanding colony of Maryland came into conflict with the Eastern Woodland Indian tribes who had been hunting and farming the region for almost 6,000 years. The conflict developed from competing views of land use. The Indians saw the land as the bearer of seasonal resources to be used when available and the English colonists saw it as a commodity to be bought and sold. When the Nanticoke tribe could no longer repel the incursions of colonists, they petitioned the Maryland Assembly to have lands granted to them for their exclusive use. The terms of the agreement and size of the lands granted were insufficient for the traditional lifeways of the Nanticoke, which led to further conflicts with their neighbors. In this lesson, the students will use a series of legal documents from the Maryland Assembly to trace the development of the conflict over land ownership. Content Standards: Era 1: Three Worlds Meet (Beginnings to 1620) Standard 2: How early European exploration and colonization resulted in cultural and ecological interactions among previously unconnected peoples Historical Thinking Standards: Standard 3: Historical Analysis and Interpretation C. Analyze cause­and­effect relationships and multiple causation, including the importance of the individual, the influence of ideas, and the role of chance. Lesson Objectives: ­Students will read primary source documents about relationships between colonial Maryland and nearby Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants, Native People Forest Walk
    Native Plants, Native People Forest Walk Natve Americans have lived in the Chesapeake Bay region since the last polar ice age, over 10,000 years ago. Before European setlers arrived in the 1600s, Indigenous peoples relied on natve plants and animals for food, shelter, clothing, tools, and medicine. On your walk today, you’ll explore a forest that is much younger than when the Woodland Indians made their homes here. Along the way, you’ll stop to learn more about some of the plants that were important to them. Start behind the Visitor’s Center to begin your walk. The numbers are 4 your guide for where to 3 stop. 2 1 1 Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) The name “persimmon” comes from the Algonquin Indians and means “dried fruit.” Persimmon fruits change from green to orange and are very biter untl they fully ripen in late fall. Natve Americans ate the fruit raw, cooked, or dried like fruit and baked into puddings and breads. The inner bark of the tree was Can you spy persimmons used to treat many ailments, among the branches? In including sore throats, fever, late fall, you may taste and stomach upset. Natve one! Look for fruit that is Americans also used the hard, orange and sof. fat seeds to play dice-like games! 2 Paw Paw (Asimina triloba) Paw Paws are members of the custard-apple family. Most species in this family are tropical—scientsts believe that the presence of paw paws in North America is the result of extnct animals spreading the seed through their droppings.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Choptank River Watersheds.3
    Upper Choptank River & Tuckahoe Creek Watershed Characterizations November 2007 Caroline County Planning & Codes Administration Health & Public Services Building 403 S. 7th Street, Suite 210 Denton, Maryland 21629-1335 Tel: 410-479-8100 Fax: 410-479-4187 Financial assistance provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Offi ce of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). A publication of the Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program, Departmentof Natural Resources pursuant to NOAA Award No. NA04NOS4190042. 11/2007 Table of Contents Sectoin 1: Cultural & Natural Resources Introduction .................................................................................................................................. Page 1 A Natural History of the Watersheds ...................................................................................................... 2 The Watersheds’ Size and Land Uses ..................................................................................................... 8 Assets of the Watersheds .......................................................................................................................14 The Economy: Agriculture, Industry, and Transportation ................................................................... 19 Governance: Jurisdictions; Organizations; Legal Structures; and Planning Resrouces ...................... 26 Historic Properties ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of MARYLAND BOARD of NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT of GEOLOGY, MINES and WATER RESOURCES Joseph T
    STATE OF MARYLAND BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, MINES AND WATER RESOURCES Joseph T. Singewald, Jr., Director BULLETIN 6 SHORE EROSION IN TIDEWATER MARYLAND CaliforniaState Division of Mines RECEIVED JAN 2 41950 library San Francisco, California BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 1949 Composed and Printed at Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Md., U.S.A. COMMISSION ON GEOLOGY, MINES AND WATER RESOURCES Arthue B. Stewart, Chairman Baltimore Holmes D. Baker Frederick Harry R. Hall Hyattsville Joseph C. Lore, Jr Solomons Island Mervin A. Pentz Denton CONTENTS The Shore Erosion Problem. By Joseph T. Singewald, Jr 1 The Maryland Situation 1 Federal Legislation 2 Policy in Other Slates 2 Uniqueness of the Maryland Problem 3 Shore Erosion Damage in Maryland 4 Methods of Shore Front Protection 4 Examples of Shore Erosion Problems 6 Miami Beach 6 New Bay Shore Park 8 Mountain Point, Gibson Island 10 Tall Timbers, Potomac River 12 Tydings on the Bay and Log Inn, Anne Arundel County 14 Sandy Point State Park 15 What Should be done about Shore Erosion 16 The Shore Erosion Measurements. By Turhit H. Slaughter 19 Definition of Terms 19 Anne Arundel County 21 Baltimore County 28 Calvert County 31 Caroline County 35 Cecil County 37 Charles County 40 Dorchester County. 45 Harford County 54 Kent County 61 Prince Georges County 66 Queen Annes County 69 St. Marys County 75 Somerset County 84 Talbot County 91 Wicomico County 107 Worcester County 109 Summary of Shore Erosion in Tidewater Maryland 115 Navigation Restoration Expenditures. By Turbit If. Slaughter 119 References 121 Description of Plates 29 to 35 123 LIST OF TABLES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland: a Geographic Study for Elementary Students
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 391 702 SO 025 696 AUTHOR Fitzhugh, William P. TITLE Maryland: A Geographic Study for Elementary Students. PUB DATE Nov 95 NOTE 13p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies (75th, Chicago, IL, November 9-12, 1995). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Education; Environment; *Environmental Education; Foreign Countries; *Geographic Concepts; Geographic Location; *Geographic Regions; Geography; *Geography Instruction; Physical Environment; *Physical Geography; *Social Studies IDENTIFIERS Chesapeake Bay; Murray River Region; Rio de la Plata ABSTRACT This paper shows comparisons among the Chesapeake Bay region of Maryland, the Murray River region of South Australia, and the Rio de la Plata region of Uruguay. Through comparative geography, students are to draw t.hOr own conclusions about the similarities and differences of the tliree regions. Teachers are encouraged touse other resources to aid in the study of-these three regions. Environmental information of the region's is presented with the geographic information. A question segment encourages further research. (EH) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. *********************************************************************** Fitzhugh, W. (1995) Maryland: A geographic study for elementary students. Paper presented at the National Council for the Social Studies Annual Conference, Chicago. This paper was presented at the conference. It is part of a larger study I C-7 conducted as part of my Christa McAuliffe Fellowship research. The title CI) of the fellowship project was: "A Comparative Geography of Three Ecologically Similar Regions." The study compared the Chesapeake Bay region of Maryland with the Murray River region of South Australia and the Rio de la Plata region of Uruguay.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Where Ordinary People Did the Extraordinary
    The Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Where Ordinary People Did the Extraordinary A partnership of Caroline and Dorchester Counties Heart of Chesapeake Country Heritage Area Maryland Office of Tourism Development Maryland State Highway Administration Corridor Management Plan Prepared by: Mary Means & Associates, Inc with Kittleson Associates, Inc, Tony Cohen Kate Clifford Larson Andy Kalback 2007 The Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Where Ordinary People Did the Extraordinary Contents Chapter 1. Harriet Tubman, the Underground Railroad and the Byway 3 Chapter 2. The Corridor Defined: Resources and Intrinsic Qualities 15 Chapter 3. Framing the Plan: Vision, Goals, Strategies 27 Chapter 4. Weaving Strategies Into Action 45 Chapter 5. Managing the Byway, Implementing the Plan 61 Acknowledgements 69 Appendices Bibliography Photo credits “Harriet Tubman in the Region”, by Kate Clifford Larson Sites on National Register of Historic Places 2 Chapter One: Harriet Tubman, the Underground Railroad, and the Byway For several years preservationists, historians, and grant funding under the National Scenic tourism officials in Dorchester and Caroline Byway Program. Through the year 2005, the Counties on Maryland’s Eastern Shore have Byways Program has provided funding for been working together on a touring drive that more than 2,100 projects along designated generally follows the route taken by slaves byways. escaping north on what came to be known as the Underground Railroad. The touring • NSB recognition improves the HTUR By- drive is designated the Underground Railroad way’s ability to compete for grants and Scenic Byway by the Maryland State Highway assistance from foundations and state Administration, and the resources of the By- and federal sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 2008, Volume 103, Issue No. 2
    . HALL 0, - -.LiRARY Summer 2008 ANNAPOL , MAF LAND MARYLAND Historical Magazine 4 Coming this summer from the MdHS Press! Treasure in the Cellar: A Tale of Gold in Depression-Era Baltimore LEONARD AUGSBURGER Coin collectors and enthusiasts have long been familiar with the story of two boys who unearthed a fortune in gold coins while playing in a Baltimore basement in 1934. But the rest of the story trailed off to a few odd details. Lifelong coin collector Leonard Augsburger uncovered the rest of the story. What happened to the kids? The gold? Who buried it in the first place? Publication Date, September 2008. Paper, $26.00. ISBN 978-0-938420-97-6. 35 % discount for MdHS members. To order call the MdHS, 410-685-3750 x363, or contact our distributor, Johns Hopkins University Press, 410-516-6965. PUBLICATION OF THIS WORK WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF THE FRIENDS OF THE PRESS OF THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Maryland Historical Society Founded 1844 Officers Henry Hodges Stansbury, Chair Francis J. Carey, Vice President Alex. G. Fisher, President Thomas A. Coliier, Vice President James W. Constable, Secretary Richard T. Moreland, Vice President Frederick M. Hudson, Treasurer Dorothy Mel. Scott, Vice President Cecil E. Flamer, Assistant Treasurer David S. Thaler, Vice President Board of Trustees Gregory H. Barnhill George S. Rich Chairmen Emeriti Ann Y. Fenwick Lynn Springer Roberts L. Patrick Deering Sandra Flax Patricia Saul Jack S. Griswold Robert Gregory Walter Schamu Samuel Hopkins Brian R Harrington David P. Scheffenacker Jr. Barbara P. Katz Louis G. Hecht Jacqueline Smeikinson Stanard T Klinefelter David L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicles of Colonial Maryland, with Illustrations
    IP ill mm i^Hil lip I ••-:.»•. :.-::,;:H 2 13-'" 975. M^L T36c 1198617 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 02229 0313 V >tJ : ^o^S?5v CHRONICLES OF COLONIAL MARYLAND WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY JAMES WALTER THOMAS Member of the Maryland Historical Society THE EDDY PRESS CORPORATION CUMBERLAND, MD. Copyright 1913 James Walter Thomas All rights reserved 1198817 PREFACE TPHIS work may be classified as an historical review of Maryland, anterior to and during the American Revolution, though its Author be- stows upon it the more modest title— Chronicles of Colonial Maryland. His chief object has been to explore and develop historic fields which have hitherto either|been wholly neglected, or have received but scant notice at the hands of historians. This does not apply to the first chapter, the ob- ject of which was to re-locate a cherished landmark, "once known, but forgotten"—the historic island of Saint Clement's—and thus rescue from oblivion, the spot consecrated as the first landing place of the Maryland colonists; as well, also, to identify the exact point of landing at the place of its permanent settlement. The Author, while conscious of the laborious research and painstaking care bestowed upon it, fully realizes that a work, so largely one of original research, is inevitably not without imperfections. In submitting it, therefore, to the public, he does so with the assuring hope that the learned and generous will appreciate the difficulties attending the undertaking, and will accord consideration and justice to the motive which animated this humble tribute to his native State.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Fine Schedule
    JOHN P. MORRISSEY DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND 187 Harry S Truman Parkway, 5th Floor Chief Judge Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Tel: (410) 260-1525 Fax: (410) 260-1375 June 30, 2021 TO: All Law Enforcement Officers of the State of Maryland Authorized to Issue Citations for Violations of the Natural Resources Laws The attached list is a fine or penalty deposit schedule for certain violations of the Natural Resources laws. The amounts set out on this schedule are to be inserted by you in the appropriate space on the citation. A defendant who does not care to contest guilt may prepay the fine in that amount. The fine schedule is applicable whether the charge is made by citation, a statement of charges, or by way of criminal information. For some violations, a defendant must stand trial and is not permitted to prepay a fine or penalty deposit. Additionally, there may be some offenses for which there is no fine listed. In both cases, you should check the box which indicates that the defendant must appear in court on the offense. I understand that this fine schedule has been approved for legal sufficiency by the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Natural Resources. This schedule has, therefore, been adopted pursuant to the authority vested in the Chief Judge of the District Court by the Constitution and laws of the State of Maryland. It is effective 07/01/2021, replacing all schedules issued prior hereto, and is to remain in force and effect until amended or repealed. No law enforcement officer in the State is authorized to deviate from this schedule in any case in which they are involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Ossuaries in Maryland: an Update
    ABORIGINAL OSSUARIES IN MARYLAND: AN UPDATE Dennis C. Curry Abstract Of the seven sites discussed here, updated infor- mation is presented for four sites (Oxford, Sandy Hill, Data collected on Maryland’s aboriginal ossuaries Cambridge Jail, and Indian Bone); one site (Brinsfield Grav- since the 1999 publication of Feast of the Dead are pre- el Pit)—with a brief reference to an ossuary published in sented. This includes new, and newly acquired, informa- 1953 and information recorded in the Maryland Historical tion from seven localities on the Eastern Shore. Trust site files since the 1970s—was overlooked during my original research; one site (Ship Point) was revealed in Introduction a recently discovered 19th-century newspaper article; and one ossuary (Harbor Point) was newly unearthed since Ever since the publication of Feast of the Dead 1999. (Curry 1999), I have been compiling additional information on the then-known ossuaries, keeping track of references Site Descriptions to ossuaries that I overlooked in the original study, and recording information on any new ossuary finds. This ar- Oxford Ossuaries ticle compiles that data—from seven ossuary locales, all on the Eastern Shore (see Figure 1)—and serves as an In 1992, the Hurt Ossuary (18TA248) was ex- update to the original book. posed by utility line installation at a residence in Oxford. FIGURE 1. Location of sites discussed in text. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MARYLAND ARCHEOLOGY, Volume 44(1):1-10, March 2008 1 2 MARYLAND ARCHEOLOGY Examination by Maryland Historical Trust staff was limit- ed, but a small edge of an ossuary pit estimated at three meters in diameter yielded the remains of at least five to six individuals; it was further estimated that the entire ossuary easily could contain several dozen individuals (Cur- ry and Kavanagh 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1927, Volume 22, Issue No. 1
    VoL XXII MARCH, 1927 No. 1 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE 2 cT^ PUBLISHED BY THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ISSUED QUAKTERLY ANNUAL SUBSGKIPnON,$a00-SINGLE NUMBERS, 75CTS_. BALTIMORE Entered aa Second-Class Matter, April 24, 1917, at the Postofflce, at Baltimore, Maryland, under the Act of August 24, 1912. THE ENDOWMENT FUND. The attention of members of the Society is again called to the urgent need for an adequate endowment fund. Our pos- sessions are wonderful, but lack of means has prevented their proper exploitation, so that they are largely inaccessible to students. Rare items of Maryland interest frequently escape us because no funds are available for their purchase. A largely increased sustaining membership will help somewhat, but an endowment is a fundamental need. Legacies are of course wel- comed, but present-day subscriptions will bring immediate results. SUBSCRIBE NOW! FORM OF BEQUEST "/ give and bequeath to The Maryland Historical Society the sum of. dollars" WSfi Sc K MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OP THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XXII BALTIMORE 1927 CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXIL PAGE CALVEBT AND DAENAIX GLEANINGS FEOM ENGUSH WIU.S. Mrs. Russel Hastings, 1, 115, 211, 307 THE INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY SECTION. James E. Hancock, 23 SOME DESCENDANTS OF COLONEL PHTUP BRISCOB. L. W. Beid, - 40 RESTORATION OF THE SENATE CHAMBER. J. Appleton Wilson, - 54 COLONIAL KECOEDS OF ANN AETJNDELL. Gontributed hy Louis Dow Soisoo, - 62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, 68, 206, 305, 391 SMALLWOOD FAMILY OP CHARLES COUNTY. Arthur L. Keith, - • 139 COLONIAL EEOOEDS OF TALBOT COUNTY. Contributed by Louis Dow Scisco, - 186 EXTRACTS FEOM ACCOUNT AND LETTER BOOKS OF DR.
    [Show full text]