Lighting up Our Lives: the History of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative 7 a Wine Press

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lighting up Our Lives: the History of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative 7 a Wine Press LIGHTING UP OUR LIVES The History of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative Written by Al Gough Jr. Tis book was published by Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. 15035 Burnt Store Road/P.O. Box 1937 Hughesville, MD 20637 www.smeco.coop © 2012 Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holders except brief quotations used in connection with reviews. All photos © their respective copyright holders. All photos not credited are from the collection of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. Every efort has been made to obtain permission to reprint photos. ISBN: 978-0-615-66998-4 Book design, layout, and jacket design by Jonna Jones. Te editing and book design were coordinated by Terry Ressler. Factual content is solely the responsibility of the author. Any questions concerning possible omissions or errors should be addressed to the author, care of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. All inquiries concerning reproduction or permissions should be addressed to Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hughesville, Maryland. Printed in the United States of America. Table of contents Acknowledgements..................................................iv Foreword ...........................................................v 1 Back to the Future: 1880–1925 .........................................6 2 Alas! Poor La Plata: 1925–1929 ........................................10 3 Holding Companies, Folding Companies and Cooperatives: 1930–1937 ....24 4 The Popes Creek Connection: 1937–1941 ..............................36 5 The Home Front: 1942–1946 ..........................................50 6 Slipping into the Modern Groove: 1947–1959 ............................64 7 The Sixties ..........................................................82 8 For Your Times They Are a-Changin’: 1970–1979..........................98 9 The Next Generation: 1980–1989 .....................................110 10 The New Millennium (Opening Pandora’s Box): 1990–2002 ...............128 11 Dealing with Pandora’s Opened Box: 2003–2012 .......................156 Epilogue..........................................................174 Honored employees and board members .............................178 Notes ............................................................182 Index. 188 Photo credits ......................................................192 iii Acknowledgements Shortly before my retirement from SMECO in June of 2006, SMECO President and Chief Executive Ofcer Joe Slater suggested a retirement project: “Write the history of the cooperative for the 75th Anniversary and you will have fve years to do it.” At the time I was thinking golf and travel, and besides, I said, I would need a word processor for such an undertaking and promptly dismissed the idea. Several months into retirement Joe came to the house one morning bearing a gift of a word proces- sor. Needless to say, without his encoragement and support over the past fve years, this history would not have been written. I would like to thank the many organizations who opened their doors and their photo archives to us. Tese organizations include the Calvert Marine Museum, the Chesapeake Beach Railway Museum, the Patuxent River Naval Air Museum, the Southern Maryland Studies Center at the College of Southern Maryland, as well as our local libraries. Many thanks to Bernadette Lewis for coordinating the photo archiving efort and former employees and co-workers who assisted with identifying photos: Fred Benton, Joyce Bowling, Carl Burch, Lorraine Cook, Ralph Cross, Lena Gardiner, Kenny Hayden, David Hogge, Sharon McWilliams, Bob Mitchell, Joan Mitchell, Louise Morgan, Glenn Sosbe, and Charlie Wible. Tanks also to Judy Dudley for her assistance and patience answering personnel inquiries, to Jonna Jones for her outstanding design and production work and to Colleen O’Neill, Patty Tennyson and John Johnston for their editing eforts. A special thanks to Terry Ressler for her editing and many constructive suggestions. It was she who had the responsibility of bringing this project together and did so with patience and humor. Lastly I would like to thank the many SMECO employees who assisted in compiling information and providing support by providing access to the Cooperative’s archives. Without their assistance this would have been an all but impossible task. Al Gough Leonardtown, Md. June 2012 iv Foreword In the early days of electric cooperatives, local residents worked together to encourage their neighbors to sign up for service and become a member of the co-op. Not everyone did. Some didn’t see the need. Tey were self-sufcient, and they were satisfed with the status quo. But some had the vision, the tenacity and the wherewithal to push the cooperative movement forward. Tose who did found themselves working alongside like-minded individuals who rallied their friends and neighbors, farmers and business people, shop keepers and bankers—people like themselves—to join the co-op. Tey provided the frm foundation of an electric cooperative that answers to its members, providing the community with reliable, afordable service. Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative has grown in the past 75 years to become one of the nation’s larg- est and most respected co-ops. Over the years we have surmounted adversities to provide electric service to a rural area too sparsely populated to be proftable for investor-owned utilities. We’ve built generating stations and purchased power on the open market. We’ve dealt with the complexities of deregulation. And through it all, we’ve held elections every year for customer-members to choose the directors of the co-op. While our mission—to serve our members faithfully—continues the same as it did when we began, today we are faced with new challenges: championing the use of renewable energy, constructing transmission lines to ensure reliable electric service and implementing technological upgrades for every facet of our busi- ness, from online billing and payment services to installing advanced metering infrastructure and smart meters. Since this book was written, more events have occurred and new utility regulations have been instituted. But our years of experience and our dedicated workforce have provided us with the confdence and agility to face any new endeavor and ever more powerful storms. Hurricane Irene was one for the history books. Te storm hit the mid-Atlantic states and rolled up the coast. On Saturday, August 27, 2011, rain began to pour on Southern Maryland and the outages began. In the early morning hours of Sunday, August 28, we had 108,000 customers without power. When the sun came up, the skies cleared, and we worked full force to restore electric service to all customers by Friday night, September 2. Battling the efects of rain, snow and ice storms has improved our emergency response eforts as we’ve learned to improve our planning process and engage our community. In that regard, we have stayed true to our roots. Te electric cooperative was formed by the community to serve the community, and that remains our mission today. Tis book documents our history and captures the events as they happened, and we are very proud to be able to present it to you, our customer-members. Joseph Stone Chairman of the Board v CHAPTER 1 Back to the Future: 1880–1925 Lollie and Susie Hunnt sitting with Carlton Gibbons (center) at Marshall Hall Park on July 4, 1899. Chapter one: 1880–1925 In 1885 the Chesapeake Bay produced more oysters than anywhere else on Earth—quite a contrast to today’s oyster harvest. Te year wasn’t all that eventful, yet there were a number of occurrences that continue to impact our lives. “Huckleberry Finn,” the frst action character, the Dr Pepper soft drink and Good Housekeeping magazine all were introduced to the public. Te Washington Monument was dedicated; the French naval ship Isere arrived in New York Harbor loaded with crates containing pieces of the Statue of Liberty; and Christmas became a national holiday in the United States. On Friday, June 4, 1885, a futuristic article appeared in the Saint Mary’s Beacon, a weekly newspaper that had been published in Leonardtown since 1839. “Te Future of Electricity,” prophesied the unidentifed author, “will work wonderfully in unexpected changes in the near future.” “Te supply of force is incomprehensible, greater than all the coal felds in the world could furnish,” he continued. “Te Tames could light London and have a force to spare. Te power could be applied to sewing machines, sawpits, lifts or a local railway. Te power of the wind and sun can be made the source of electricity. Te power of storage is limited but when solved, a locomotive, boat or tricycle could be supplied and a carriage could be driven. One of the benefcent results is the use in isolated households. Te use of steam has brought about our factory system that has led to the concentration of our population in large cities. Electric power is divisible and can be used economically in smaller quantities, hence its use will be to distribute rather than to concentrate population. We can scarcely conceive the changes that electricity will bring not only economically but to the social condition of mankind.” Some fve years before, on Jan. 22, 1880, the Saint Mary’s Beacon had run an article noting that Tomas Edison had opened his home at Menlo Park in New York to the public on New Year’s Day, to exhibit his elec- tric lights—some of which had been burning for 218 hours. A mere two years later, his work had led to the frst commercial power plant, the Pearl Street Power Station in New York City, which was a direct current (DC) system that could power 5,000 lights. In 1886 George Westinghouse, armed with some 400 patents, formed the Westinghouse Electric Co., and in 1893 his company used an alternating current (AC) system to light the Chicago World’s Fair. It was found that an AC system was more conducive to sending electricity over long distances and in that same year, a 22-mile AC power line was opened in California, sending electricity from Folsom Powerhouse in Folsom to Sacramento.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020
    Maryland State Archives Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Report of the State Archivist to the Governor and General Assembly (State Government Article, § 9-1007(d)) Timothy D. Baker State Archivist and Commissioner of Land Patents August 2020 Maryland State Archives 350 Rowe Boulevard · Annapolis, MD 21401 410-260-6400 · http://msa.maryland.gov ​ ​ MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Table of Contents Agency Organization & Overview of Activities . 3 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of November 14, 2019 Agenda . 27 Minutes . .47 Chronology of Staff Events. .55 Records Retention Schedules . .65 Disposal Certificate Approvals . .. .70 Records Received . .78 Special Collections Received . 92 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of May 08, 2020 Agenda . .93 Minutes . .115 Chronology of Staff Activities . .121 Records Retention Schedules . .129 Disposal Certificate Approvals . 132 Records Received . 141 Special Collections Received . .. 158 Maryland Commission on Artistic Property Meeting of Agenda . 159 Minutes . 163 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank 2 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 STATE ARCHIVES ANNUAL REPORT FY 2020 OVERVIEW · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Spring 2020 ​ · Commission on Artistic Property Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ The State Archives was created in 1935 as the Hall of Records and reorganized under its present name in 1984 (Chapter 286, Acts of 1984). Upon that reorganization the Commission on Artistic Property was made part of the State Archives. As Maryland's historical agency, the State Archives is the central depository for government records of permanent value.
    [Show full text]
  • Popes Creek Trail Concept Presented
    Popes Creek Trail concept presented Posted by TBN_Charles On 06/22/2017 La Plata, MD - The Pope’s Creek Rail Trail is moving forward. Eileen Minnick, Charles County director of recreation, told the Charles County Commissioners Tuesday, June 20 that barring any hiccups along the way, construction on the new trail could begin as early as next summer. In January 2014, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources was awarded a $1 million federal grant to preserve 220 acres of the Popes Creek watershed. The thought was to establish a new rail trail along the abandoned Popes Creek rail bed, a distance of some two miles. “One of the goals of the county recreation and parks and tourism is water access,” said Parks Director Jon Snow. “It’s a real challenge to get waterfront access.” Snow said the county is adding boat ramps and kayak launches at Port Tobacco River Park and Chapel Point. “Everyone in Charles County wants it, but not everyone is a boater,” Snow said. “But they still want water access. These projects will do a really good job of providing that. “Popes Creek is one of our best opportunities for waterfront access,” he added. “We’ve got a really good opportunity to create a water access venue on and off the water. Steve Engle of Vista Design Inc. outlined a conceptual plan for the trail, which includes an elevated observation platform over the Potomac River and a possible museum at the site of the old Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative power plant at Popes Creek, built in 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background
    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 2 26.08.01.00 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapter 01 General Authority: Environment Article, §§9-313—9-316, 9-319, 9-320, 9-325, 9-327, and 9-328, Annotated Code of Maryland 3 26.08.01.01 .01 Definitions. A. General. (1) The following definitions describe the meaning of terms used in the water quality and water pollution control regulations of the Department of the Environment (COMAR 26.08.01—26.08.04). (2) The terms "discharge", "discharge permit", "disposal system", "effluent limitation", "industrial user", "national pollutant discharge elimination system", "person", "pollutant", "pollution", "publicly owned treatment works", and "waters of this State" are defined in the Environment Article, §§1-101, 9-101, and 9-301, Annotated Code of Maryland. The definitions for these terms are provided below as a convenience, but persons affected by the Department's water quality and water pollution control regulations should be aware that these definitions are subject to amendment by the General Assembly. B. Terms Defined. (1) "Acute toxicity" means the capacity or potential of a substance to cause the onset of deleterious effects in living organisms over a short-term exposure as determined by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER AND DEEP CREEK LAKE .................. 4 I. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ........................................................... 9 III. The Youghiogheny River/Deep Creek Lake Audit, May 16, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned............................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO: COASTAL BAYS ............................................................................. 15 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 15 II. Active Enforcement Efforts and Pending Matters ............................................. 17 III. The Coastal Bays Audit, July 12, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned .. 20 CHAPTER THREE: WYE RIVER ................................................................................. 24 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 24 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ......................................................... 26 III. The Wye River Audit, October 10, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned 27 CHAPTER FOUR: POTOMAC RIVER NORTH BRANCH AND SAVAGE RIVER 31 I. Background .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green V. Garrett: How the Economic Boom of Professional Sports Helped to Create, and Destroy, Baltimore's
    Green v. Garrett: How the Economic Boom of Professional Sports Helped to Create, and Destroy, Baltimore’s Memorial Stadium 1953 Renovation and upper deck construction of Memorial Stadium1 Jordan Vardon J.D. Candidate, May 2011 University of Maryland School of Law Legal History Seminar: Building Baltimore 1 Kneische. Stadium Baltimore. 1953. Enoch Pratt Free Library, Baltimore. Courtesy of Enoch Pratt Free Library, Maryland’s State Library Resource Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Table of Contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................3 II. Historical Background: A Brief History of the Location of Memorial Stadium..............................................................................................................6 A. Ednor Gardens.............................................................................................8 B. Venable Park..............................................................................................10 C. Mount Royal Reservoir..............................................................................12 III. Venable Stadium..............................................................................................16 A. Financial History of Venable Stadium.......................................................19 IV. Baseball in Baltimore.......................................................................................24 V. The Case – Not a Temporary Arrangement.....................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • HON. ALBERT C. RITCHIE Governor -3-^3-/6" '' C ^ O 1 N J U
    HON. ALBERT C. RITCHIE Governor -3-^3-/6" '' c ^ o 1 n J U MARYLAND MANUAL l 925 A Compendium of Legal, Historical and Statistical Information Relating to the STATE OF MARYLAND Compiled by E. BROOKE LEE, Secretary of State. 20TH CENTURY PRINTING CO. BALTIMORE. MD. State Government, 1925 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT State House, Annapolis. Baltimore Office 603 Union Trust Building. (iovernor: Albert C. Ritchie Baltimore City Secretary of State: E. Brooke Lee Silver Spring Executive Secretary: Kenneth M. Burns. .Baltimore Stenographers: Miss Virginia Dinwiddie Ellinger ; Baltimore Mrs. Bettie Smith ...Baltimore Clerks: Murray G. Hooper Annapolis Raymond M. Lauer. — Annapolis Chas. Burton Woolley .Annapolis The Governor is elected by the people for a term of four years from the second Wednesday in January ensuing his election (Constitu- tion, Art. 2, Sec. 2) ;* The Secretary of State is appointed by the Gov- ernor, with the consent of the Senate, to hold office during the term of the Governor; all other officers are appointed by the Governor to hold office during his pleasure Under the State Reorganization Law, which became operative Janu- ary 1, 1923, the Executive Department was reorganized and enlarged to include, besides the Secretary of State, the following: Parole Commis- sioner, The Commissioner of the Land Office, The Superintendent of Pub- lic Buildings, The Department of Legislative Reference, The Commis- sioners for Uniform State Laws, The State Librarian. The Secretary of State, in addition to his statutory duties, is the General Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Jamie Raskin Ben Cardin
    HHH Official Democratic Sample Ballot HHH General Election • November 6, 2018 • 7 am - 8 pm IT IS LEGAL TO TAKE THIS SAMPLE BALLOT INTO THE VOTING BOOTH Need A Ride to the Polls or more information Call 301-946-1000 BEN CARDIN United States Senator • Third-generation Marylander who has dedicated his life to public service. • Strident defender of the Chesapeake Bay. • Has fought to strengthen the middle class and improve our economy. • Held the line against Republican attempts to repeal Obamacare and deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. • Voted against the Trump tax cuts that gave permanent breaks to big corporations. • Taking on the NRA to pass a national ban on assault weapons, bump stocks and require universal background checks for all gun purchases. • Lead Democrat on the Senate Small Business Committee, where he works to empower minority-, women- and veteran-owned small businesses. • Fighting to safeguard civil rights and banish discrimination. • Leader in protecting Planned Parenthood, and defending women’s rights and human rights at home and globally. • Vocal defender of federal workers. • Working to ensure quality higher education is within reach. JAMIE RASKIN U.S. House of Representatives, District 8 • Currently represents Maryland’s 8th District in the U.S. House of Representatives. • Vice-Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee. • Senior Whip for the Democratic Caucus. • Vice-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. • Was a constitutional law professor for a quarter-century at American University prior to being elected to Congress in 2016. • Served for a decade in the Maryland Senate where he was Majority Whip.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Secretaries & Executive Directors
    History of MACo 5 Executive Secretaries & Executive Directors Robert Lovelace: June 1960 - November 1961 Bill Ratchford: November 1961 - October 1962 Thomas Kelly: October 1962 - January 1964 Bill Ratchford: January 1964 - November 1968 Joe Murnane: November 1968 - May 1978 Wallace “Wally” Hutton: October 1978 - July 1981 Althea “Tee” O'Connor: September 1981 - August 1985 Raquel Sanudo: June 1985 - June 1991 David Bliden: July 1991 - Present Since the first Executive Director was hired in 1960, the men and women who have held that position have come from varied career backgrounds. The responsibilities of the position have changed and duties have been expanded and diversified. Similarly, the MACo staff has grown, from the charter staff of Executive Secretary Lovelace and a stenographer, to the seven staff members who serve the organization today. Each Executive Director has not only redefined the position, but, along with his or her staff, has helped to shape and develop MACo itself. Robert Lovelace As discussed in the previous chapter, Robert Lovelace, a former city manager, began his duties with the Association upon the establishment of the Symons Hall office beginning June 1, 1960. Per the agreement with the University of Maryland, he joined their staff as a lecturer in American Government. As the first Executive Secretary, as it was then called, Lovelace set the pace and provided a basic structure for those that would come after him. As is the case today, in 1960 the SACCOM Board was made up of county officials for whom Association service was only one aspect of their responsibilities; Lovelace was the first person involved with the organization that could focus wholly on its development.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Future Development and Operations
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND June 2001 Fort George G. Meade, Maryland Directorate of Public Works Environmental Management Office Fort Meade, Maryland 20755 U.S. Army Military District of Washington Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, D.C. 20319 .... FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcrSTATMENT···- LEAD AGENCY: Department of the Army, Military District of Washington. TITLE OF THE PROPOSED ACTION: Future Development and Operations Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. AFFECTED JURISDICTION: State of Maryland, Anne Arundel and Howard Counties. PROPONENT REVIEWED BY: Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Management Office, Fort Meade, Maryland 20755. REVIEWED BY: U.S. Army Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319. END OF WAITING PERIOD AFTER FILING: 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. ABSTRACT: An environmental assessment (EA) prepared in April 1999 determined that potentially significant adverse impacts to traffic and air quality could result from the proposed future development and operations at Fort Meade. Pursuant to NEPA, this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was undertaken to evaluate, in detail, the environmental and socioeconomic effects of future development and operations at the installation, specifically planned new construction and associated demolition activities. The Proposed Action includes development and operations expected to occur on the installation between 2001 and 2005. To provide the specificity needed for reasonable predictions of environmental consequences, 11 projects were identified by the Fort Meade Master Planner for consideration within the Proposed Action as being representative of the expected build out. Alternative A consists of constructing 9 of the 11 projects, excluding the two projects least likely to occur; their elimination reduces the number of additional personnel by 272, or 30 percent of the 912 additional personnel included in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland
    Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland Maryland celebrates 350 years MARYLAND HERITAGE COMMITTEE March, 1985 On the Occasion of Maryland’s 350th Birthday from the Ark of refuge, from the Dove of peace, we have become. we celebrate three hundred fifty years of learning. turning watermen and women, hill folk and city, into citizens. safe now and at peace in this proud state named for a woman we blend our brown and yellow, red and black and white into a greater We. Maryland, heiress to refuge and to peace. We celebrate. We praise. by Lucille Clifton Poet Laureate of Maryland This book was composed in Caslon 540 text and display type by Brushwood Graphics Studio from a design by Carleton ‘B’ Hayek. It was printed by the Collins Lithographing & Printing Company, Inc. 20C71453 Report of The MARYLAND HERITAGE COMMITTEE Annapolis March 29, 1985 Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland Peoples and nations pause occasionally to celebrate their gods, their heroes and victories, their origins and successes. Maryland first celebrated its founding in 1834 and has continued to do so in 50 year intervals. The pattern for celebrating thus established, Maryland was ready as 1984 approached to look back with pride on 350 years of political, social and cultural achievement. As in previous an- niversaries, the celebration of the past became an affirmation of the future. To prepare the state for its 1984 celebration, the 1982 General Assembly of Maryland passed a resolution (Appendix i) creating the 350 Coordinating Com- mittee which subsequently became the Maryland Heritage Committee.
    [Show full text]