DOCSLIB.ORG

SITESOLUTIONS Commercial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SITESOLUTIONS Commercial SITESOLUTIONS Commercial Report prepared on Industrial Unit, Portwood Industrial Estate Mersey Street, Stockport, SK1 2JD Report reference Specimen Report National grid reference 390420 390940 Report prepared for Specimen Client Client reference Specimen Report Report date 25th January 2006 Bespoke Site Solutions www.argyllenvironmental.com Aerial Photograph Report prepared on Industrial Unit, Portwood Industrial Estate, Mersey Street ,Stockport, SK1 2JD Report reference Specimen Report National grid reference 390420 390940 www.argyllenvironmental.com 0845 458 5250 Bespoke Site Solutions ii Risk Analysis Report prepared on Industrial Unit, Portwood Industrial Estate, Mersey Street, Stockport, SK1 2JD (the Site) Current Use Light Industrial Proposed Use Light Industrial Additional Information Provided Purchase Environmental Liability Assessment Potential Liabilities have been identified under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (or where appropriate, equivalent requirements under the planning regime) and/or the Water Resources Act 1991. To quantify these you may decide to undertake a more detailed assessment through the recommendation(s) set out below. 1. We recommend regulatory consultation with the Local Authority Environmental Health and Planning Departments to include a review of planning records for the Site, details of any past Site investigations/remediation work, relevant information concerning the Authorities strategy under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and any other information regarding ground conditions. Argyll Environmental would be pleased to undertake this review for £200 excluding VAT and any local authority charges. In addition, the following natural or mining related hazards have been identified in the immediate vicinity of the Site: Extreme Flooding, Coal Mining 1. More detailed information regarding flooding is provided in the Technical Data section of this report. Further information and guidance is available from the Environment Agency. 2. As the Site lies within a Coal Mining area, it is recommended that a Commercial Coal Mining Report is obtained from the Coal Authority. Contact details are provided at the end of this report. Although outside the scope of this assessment we would draw your attention to the Additional Considerations detailed later in this section of the report. If you require assistance with any of the recommendations listed above or the additional considerations detailed later in this report please contact us on 0845 458 5250 or by email ([email protected]). Please refer to the attached letter from Argyll Insurance Services that provides information about Risk Transfer Options. www.argyllenvironmental.com 0845 4585250 Bespoke Site Solutions iii Executive Summary Site use The Site was developed as a depot c.1980 with a number of small ancillary buildings. By c.1989 the Site is no longer indicated as a depot but is shown as part of Portwood Industrial Estate. Data indicates that the Site was used as a licensed waste management facility until c.2001. It was permitted to receive industrial non-hazardous waste and building materials. We have been informed by the client that the Site is currently in light industrial use. The historic and current use of the Site therefore presents a moderate risk. Regulatory Compliance The following authorisations, licences, consents or enforcements have been identified at or within 25m of the Site: Type Details Local Authority Pollution Prevention 1. Mersey Street,Stockport,Merseyside,Sk1 4aa, Pollution Incident: Not Control Enforcement Supplied, Reference: EPA043. Waste Management Facility Location 1. Licence Number: 53452, Borron Street,Portwood,Stockport,Cheshire,SK1 2JD, Operator: North West Water Ltd, Site Category: Special Waste Transfer Stations, Licence Status: Surrendered Waste Transfer Site 1. Licence Holder: North West Water Ltd, Licence Reference: 01144, Site Category: Transfer The Local Authority Pollution Prevention Control Enforcement noted above is not considered likely to relate to the Site, as data indicates that it has never held such a consent. Surrounding area use A number of historic or current potentially contaminative uses were identified in proximity to the Site. These include but are not limited to; a gravel pit 10m to the east c.1872; a gas works 300m to the south west 1895 – 1938 (the gasometers remain); a cotton mill 10m to the south of the Site c.1895 – 1955 (subsequently a works c. 1959 and a foundry by 1972) and a plastic works/unspecified works adjacent to the Site c. 1975 – 1989 (subsequently a garage that currently operates a paint spraying process regulated by the Local Authority). By 1989 the surrounding buildings are indicated as forming part of Portwood Industrial Estate. According to trade directories, current or recent operations in proximity to the Site include garage services, furniture manufacturers, printers and metal finishing services. Data indicates the factory 30m to the north operates a coating process regulated by the Local Authority. In addition the buffer zone of a registered landfill site licenced to accept inert/non hazardous waste was noted 49m north west. The historic and current use of the surrounding area is therefore considered to present a moderate risk to the Site. www.argyllenvironmental.com 0845 4585250 Bespoke Site Solutions iv Environmental sensitivity Soils of high leaching potential and a major aquifer have been identified beneath the Site. The nearest licensed groundwater abstraction is located 618m south west of the Site for manufacturing and the nearest licensed surface water abstraction is located 681m to the west of the Site for cooling. The River Goyt is located 50m south east of the Site. Residential properties are located 70m north east. The Site is therefore considered to have a moderate to high environmental sensitivity. Conclusion In our opinion, there is a moderate risk of soil and groundwater contamination from on-site sources. As regards off- site sources, the risk is considered as moderate. These potential sources of contamination have been considered in light of the Site’s moderate to high environmental sensitivity. In conclusion, in the context of this assessment and assuming a non-sensitive end-use, Potential Liabilities have been identified under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (or where appropriate, equivalent requirements under the planning regime) and/or the Water Resources Act 1991. To quantify these you may decide to undertake a more detailed assessment through the recommendation(s) set out on page iii. Sources of Information No additional materials have been used in this assessment. www.argyllenvironmental.com 0845 4585250 Bespoke Site Solutions v Additional Considerations Whilst this assessment is primarily a desktop assessment of potential soil and groundwater liabilities, the following environmental compliance considerations have been identified in relation to the infrastructure and/or occupation of the Site. Operational Such liabilities may arise if the site is in commercial/industrial use and both the Site and the compliance business are being purchased, or the Site is to be purchased as an investment with an operational business as a tenant. The operational standards of businesses vary greatly. To assess the Site it would be prudent to undertake an environmental due-diligence audit. Please contact us for a quotation. Asbestos If the buildings at the Site were constructed or renovated during the period between 1950 and 1999, then the fabric of these buildings may contain asbestos in a variety of forms. Buildings constructed from 1950 to 1970 are most at risk. The Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 2002 and HSE Guidance note MDHS 100, in respect of non-domestic premises, require the confirmation of the absence of asbestos or the management of asbestos through an Asbestos Register that records the location, type, condition, inspection regime and responsible persons. Such action was required by 21st May 2004. The maximum penalties for non-compliance are an unlimited fine and/or up to two years imprisonment. A Type II Asbestos Survey may therefore be required. Please contact us for a quotation. Oil Storage Oil storage facilities of greater than 200 litres capacity fall within the Oil Storage Regulations 2001. Under these regulations any above-ground storage facility should be provided with secondary containment to prevent spills or leaks. Existing oil stores had until September 2005 to meet these regulations. An inspection of any such facilities would therefore be prudent. Please contact us for a quotation. Interceptors Drainage from car parks or operational areas may discharge to Controlled Waters. This discharge is likely to require treatment prior to release, for example an oil/water interceptor. Without this treatment a discharge could allow polluting matter to enter Controlled Waters in breach of the Water Resources Act 1991 (WRA). The WRA also requires that a Discharge Consent is held by site owners/operators for discharges to Controlled Waters. It would be prudent to ensure that any discharge from large car parks (more than 50 parking spaces) or operational areas is treated prior to its release to Controlled Waters and that a valid Discharge Consent is held. Please contact us if you require further assistance. Additional Additional sources of information maybe available for the Site. These sources could include Information Sources previous environmental reports (including audits, contaminated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SITESOLUTIONS Commercial
    SITESOLUTIONS Commercial Overall Opinion FURTHER ACTION Argyll's Overview Considering t!e in"orma ion reviewed d#ring t!is assessmen , pla#si%le con aminan linkages have %een iden i"ied and soil and groundwa er lia%ili ies could occ#r w!e !er or not redevelopmen is considered. Accordingly$ poten ial Lia%ili ies have %een iden i"ied under !e relevan con amina ed land legisla ion' The "ollowing ot!er Environmen al Ha(ards !ave been iden i"ied in !e immedia e vicini y of !e Si e: Radon %e ween * and 3%, -ining Ins a%ili y$ and Coal Mining. One or more Con rol of Repor on) Ma.or Acciden Ha(ards /COMAH0 si es are loca ed wi !in 500m. Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town, Sample County, United Kingdom Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report date: Sample Sample 3 ! 6ecem%er 52*1 Client Reference: National Grid Reference: Sample +32452$+32342 Si e Loca ion Report prepared on Sample Si e, Sample S ree , Sample Town$ Sample Coun y$ Uni ed Kingdom Site Area (m2 854+'93 Current Use Ind#s rial "roposed Use Ind#s rial Report Aut#or Ali S an on BA /Hons0 MSc AIEMA Telep!one: 0845 458 5252 www'argyllenvironmen al'com In elligen 6#e 6iligence Si e Sol# ions Commercial - Sample 5 3 ! <#ne 52*5 S#mmary o" Con amina ion Ris& and Lia%ili ies Lia%ili y Assessmen Read recommenda ions F#r !er ac ion Lia%ili y Assessmen =o en ial Lia%ili ies !ave %een iden i"ied #nder =ar 5A o" !e Environmen al =ro ec ion Ac *332 /or w!ere appropria e$ e>#ivalen re>#iremen s #nder !e planning regime0 and?or !e @a er Reso#rces Ac *33*' To >#an i"y !ese yo# may decide
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Mill, Water Street, Portwood
    Application DC/063280 Reference DC/063281 Location: Meadow Mill, Water Street, Portwood, Stockport SK1 2BX PROPOSAL: Full and Listed building consent for: Conversion of part vacant Grade II listed former mill building into a mixed use development; comprising of 213 apartments on upper floors and 2208sqm of D2 (Leisure Use) and 200sqm A3 (Restaurant) use at ground floor level. Works include refurbishment and repair of the building, removal of existing roof and replacement of additional 7th floor in addition to upper floor extensions of the buildings northern and southern wings to accommodate additional 6th floors. Works to also include alterations to existing access, associated landscaping and creation of 173 car parking spaces within the buildings grounds. (Amended Scheme) Type Of DC/063280 Full Application Application: DC/063281 Listed Building Consent Registration Date: Expiry Date: Case Officer: Mr Steven Kirkham Applicant: William George Homes Agent: As per applicant DELEGATION/COMMITTEE STATUS PHRC decision. Residential Development in excess of 100 dwellings. Application referred to Central Area Committee for comment/recommendation. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This is a joint report to cover Full Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent that is being sought for the extension and conversion of Meadow Mill into a mixed use development of residential apartments and ground floor leisure space with associated landscaping, access and car parking works. The proposals represent an amendment to the original submission, this has resulted in changes to the upper floor extensions and a reduction from 217 apartments to 213. This was required in the interests of the conservation of the heritage asset. The proposals include a comprehensive refurbishment and repair of the existing mill building.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Stockport SHLAA Report and Appendices 1 to 4
    Stockport Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SHLAA 2018 Using a base date of 1 April 2018 December 2018 Table of Figures Figure 2.1 Net additional dwelling completions 2011 – 2018 3 Figure 3.1 Extract from the PPG showing suggested methodology 5 Figure 3.2 Gross / net developable area assumptions 13 Figure 3.3 Typical lead in times for sites delivering dwellings 14 Figure 3.4 Typical build rates for different sizes of development 14 Figure 3.5 Small sites delivery 16 Figure 4.1 Deliverable and developable sites 19 Figure 4.2 Stockport’s housing land supply 20 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Policy background.................................................................................................................... 2 National planning policy and guidance ........................................................................................ 2 Local policy context ..................................................................................................................... 2 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 5 Stage 1: Identification of broad location and sites ........................................................................ 6 The broad location of study ...................................................................................................... 6 Identification
    [Show full text]
  • VMS DANIEL's LANE 003 5 3A
    The Queens (PH) Subway ST MARY'S WAY 9 VMS DANIEL'S LANE 003 5 3a 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH KNIGHTSBRIDGE LB 001 Shelter LITTLE EGERTON STREET 002 KEY: Lighting Gantry TRAVIS BROW 009 Shelter 006 Park Bridge 241215'&8/5%#42#4- NEW BRIDGE LANE 008 &+52.#;5106190%'064' 005 #2241#%*4176'5 57$,'%6 KING STREET EAST 33 GREAT PORTWOOD STREET 007 61(70&+0) Car Park Works 35 241215'&56#6+%%#42#4- HOLLYWOOD WAY 004 5+)05614'2.#%'1.&#0& 12 8/5%#42#4-5+)05 1a 18 3 9'..+0)6104&06**'#610.#0' &'$'0*#/5#139 7 241215'&.#4)'&+)+6#. 64#8+5$4195%#.' HEATON LANE 15 *1..;911&9#;5%#.' Subway 64#8+5$419#.+0-41#&5%#.' 5%#.' )4'#6')'4610564''65%#.'Bank )4'#62146.#0&564''6-0+)*65$4+&)'5%#.' 56/#4;59#;0'9$4+&)'.#0'5%#.'1 2146911&4170&#$1765%#.' PH HESKETH STREET &+52.#;510*+)*9#; MANCHESTER ROAD 42 CLIFTON ROAD DERBY ROAD 12 9 70 26 5 73 19 PEARSON STREET 56 to 64 to 56 Gresham Walk 9 1 Allot Gdns 36 PARSONAGE ROAD 1 65 to 73 to 65 Belmont Nursery School 36 5 81 75 1 53 6 4 12 ESS BARDSLEY STREET 1 40 SANDY LANE 80 171 40 2 WALMSLEY STREET2 1 to 16 BURY STREET 40 72 85 68 10 Childrens Centre Sycamore 5 14 40 34 HAMILTON ROAD 32 81 48 Court SANDY LANE 7 1 M 60 The Ashleys 83 BURTON STREET HEATON ROAD SUTTON ROAD 135 31 STANLEY ROAD 9 TIVIOT WAY 1 Garage Shelter 65 164 48 63 1 38 70 20 ELLEN STREET 10 34 TIVIOT WAY 18 12 ALBION CLOSE 19 108 60 VMS Tame 67 163 Allotment 28 to 32 to 28 MARTEL COURT 17 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH 93 WHITEFIELD Gardens River 26 Mast 8 63 86 Recreation Ground (Telecommunication) 32 &'016'5.1%#6+10(14 NAPIER ROAD 35 58 7 13 40 58 38 Shelter
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1. Apendix 1. Heritage Topic Paper
    Appendix 1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Heritage Topic Paper Revision A Prepared on behalf of: Greater Manchester Combined Authority September 2019 7 BDP. Revision A Date September 2019 Project Reference 3000631 Prepared by AM/CN Checked by CN PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents. Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................................. i Introduction. ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the Paper. ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Structure of this Paper ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A Profile of the Greater Manchester Historic Environment ..................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction. ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 th 2.2 Origins and Development to the Beginning of the 20 Century. ............................................................................ 3 2.3 Two Cities and Ten Metropolitan Boroughs. .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MILLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2005 – 2015: Strategy for the Regeneration of Stockport’S Historic Textile Works
    MILLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2005 – 2015: Strategy for the regeneration of Stockport’s historic textile works CONTENTS PAGES 1. INTRODUCTION 2 - 6 2. THE MILL RESOURCE 7 - 11 3. PLANNING POLICY 12 - 14 4. REGENERATION PRIORITIES 15 - 17 5. ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 18 - 23 6. ACTION PLAN 24 - 31 APPENDIX I LIST OF STANDING MILL BUILDINGS 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose In common with many North West towns, Stockport has a rich legacy of former mill buildings, developed as part of the town’s growth as an important textile centre. Although mass production in this industry has now disappeared, the mill buildings remain as a significant part of the economic and physical fabric of the town. They are an important asset, but one that needs to be managed carefully. This report has been prepared in response to a need to develop a strategic approach to maximise opportunities presented by the mill resource. The purpose of this report and strategy is to: (a) Outline the current position with regard to the mill resource. (b) Outline the key issues facing the mill resource. (c) Set down an overall strategy, objectives and action plan to guide the future development and use of mill buildings and sites within the town. The Mills Development Plan is adopted by the Council as a strategy document. As an outcome of the strategy (see the Action Plan accompanying this document) planning briefs will be developed on key sites and these documents will be incorporated into either the existing Unitary Development Plan or the planned Local Development Framework. 1.2 Definition of the mill resource The strategy takes as its main focus the 64 historic textile sites remaining from the 18 th , 19 th and early 20 th century textile industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 SHLAA Report and All Appendices
    Stockport Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SHLAA 2018 Using a base date of 1 April 2018 December 2018 Table of Figures Figure 2.1 Net additional dwelling completions 2011 – 2018 3 Figure 3.1 Extract from the PPG showing suggested methodology 5 Figure 3.2 Gross / net developable area assumptions 13 Figure 3.3 Typical lead in times for sites delivering dwellings 14 Figure 3.4 Typical build rates for different sizes of development 14 Figure 3.5 Small sites delivery 16 Figure 4.1 Deliverable and developable sites 19 Figure 4.2 Stockport’s housing land supply 20 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Policy background.................................................................................................................... 2 National planning policy and guidance ........................................................................................ 2 Local policy context ..................................................................................................................... 2 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 5 Stage 1: Identification of broad location and sites ........................................................................ 6 The broad location of study ...................................................................................................... 6 Identification
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Mills
    REVIEW OF STOCKPORT’S MILLS June 2017 Addressing the future of Stockport’s historic textile related mills Foreword by Councillor Graham Greenhalgh, Chair of the Scrutiny Review Panel This review builds on the excellent work initiated in the report ‘Towards a Mills Strategy’ of 2005 and the subsequent review dated 2011. Both reports recognised Stockport’s Textile Mills as a continuing valuable resource and their place as a symbol of our local heritage and pride. The original 2005 report summarised the aims most succinctly as ‘to lay the foundations for a comprehensive Mills Strategy, designed to support key council objectives of regeneration, employment and enhancement of the housing available within our popular borough, married with genuine and sensible conservation’. The aim of this 2017 review is to update our knowledge of the Historic Textile Mills stock, their present status and known future plans. As all of Stockport’s Historic Textile Mills are in private hands we hope to promote, and where possible support, a successful future for them, their continued use, development, and improvements in the present tough financial environment. This review is valid as a stand-alone document but can help inform broader works being undertaken by the council such as the Brown Field First and the Local Plan. I thank officers and members for the successful completion of this document against a background of multiple demands on their time and energies with the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF), the Local Plan, Brown Field First and the support for the Greater Manchester Historic Mills Survey. The dedication by the officers to complete this review was exemplary.
    [Show full text]
  • SITESOLUTIONS Inspect
    SITESOLUTIONS Inspect Report prepared on Industrial unit at, Borron Street, Portwood Industrial Estate, Stockport, SK1 2JD Report reference SpecCommercialPotentialLiabilities National grid reference 390420, 390940 Report prepared for Specimen Client Client reference Client Ref Report date 13th May 2008 Intelligent Due Diligence www.argyllenvironmental.com Liability Assessment Report prepared on Site Area (m2) Estimated Building Coverage (%) Industrial unit at, Borron Street, 7290.37 25 Portwood Industrial Estate, Stockport, SK1 2JD (the Site) Current Use Proposed Use Additional Information Provided Light Industrial Light Industrial Purchase Liability Assessment Within the scope of this assessment no Liabilities have been identified. However, your attention is drawn to the prudent measures suggested below. Recommendations Recommendations 1. A suitable oil water interceptor should be installed to prevent oily discharge via stormwater drains to the River Goyt. In addition, Site management should contact the local sewerage provider to obtain a trade effluent consent or letter of exemption for the discharge of trade effluent from vehicle washing. If drains connect directly to the nearby river, an Environment Agency discharge consent may be required. Budget estimate £15,000 to £20,000 plus VAT. 2. The compressors at the Site should be upgraded or provided with secondary containment to prevent further oily blowdown. Budget estimate £500 to £5,000 plus VAT depending upon scope of work required. Risk Summary Overall on-site risk Low to Moderate Overall off-site risk Moderate Environmental sensitivity rating Moderate to High Although outside the scope of this assessment we would draw your attention to the Additional Considerations detailed later in this section of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Christian CROMWELL STREET 38 War
    The Queens (PH) Subway ST MARY'S WAY 9 VMS DANIEL'S LANE 003 5 3a 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH KNIGHTSBRIDGE LB 001 Shelter LITTLE EGERTON STREET 002 KEY: Lighting Gantry TRAVIS BROW 009 Shelter 006 Park Bridge 241215'&8/5%#42#4- NEW BRIDGE LANE 008 &+52.#;5106190%'064' 005 #2241#%*4176'5 57$,'%6 KING STREET EAST 33 GREAT PORTWOOD STREET 007 61(70&+0) Car Park Works 35 241215'&56#6+%%#42#4- HOLLYWOOD WAY 004 5+)05614'2.#%'1.&#0& 12 8/5%#42#4-5+)05 1a 18 3 9'..+0)6104&06**'#610.#0' &'$'0*#/5#139 7 241215'&.#4)'&+)+6#. 64#8+5$4195%#.' HEATON LANE 15 *1..;911&9#;5%#.' Subway 64#8+5$419#.+0-41#&5%#.' 5%#.' )4'#6')'4610564''65%#.'Bank )4'#62146.#0&564''6-0+)*65$4+&)'5%#.' 56/#4;59#;0'9$4+&)'.#0'5%#.'1 2146911&4170&#$1765%#.' PH HESKETH STREET &+52.#;510*+)*9#; MANCHESTER ROAD 42 CLIFTON ROAD DERBY ROAD 12 9 70 26 5 73 19 PEARSON STREET 56 to 64 to 56 Gresham Walk 9 1 Allot Gdns 36 PARSONAGE ROAD 1 65 to 73 to 65 Belmont Nursery School 36 5 81 75 1 53 6 4 12 ESS BARDSLEY STREET 1 40 SANDY LANE 80 171 40 2 WALMSLEY STREET2 1 to 16 BURY STREET 40 72 85 68 10 Childrens Centre Sycamore 5 14 40 34 HAMILTON ROAD 32 81 48 Court SANDY LANE 7 1 M 60 The Ashleys 83 BURTON STREET HEATON ROAD SUTTON ROAD 135 31 STANLEY ROAD 9 TIVIOT WAY 1 Garage Shelter 65 164 48 63 1 38 70 20 ELLEN STREET 10 34 TIVIOT WAY 18 12 ALBION CLOSE 19 108 60 VMS Tame 67 163 Allotment 28 to 32 to 28 MARTEL COURT 17 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH 93 WHITEFIELD Gardens River 26 Mast 8 63 86 Recreation Ground (Telecommunication) 32 &'016'5.1%#6+10(14 NAPIER ROAD 35 58 7 13 40 58 38 Shelter
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Landscape Character Assessment 2018
    Stockport Landscape Character Assessment and Landscape Sensitivity Study Produced for Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report Prepared by LUC August 2018 Front cover photograph: The edge of Ludworth Moor, looking back towards Greater Manchester Project Title: Stockport Landscape Character Assessment and Landscape Sensitivity Study Client: Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 29.3.18 Draft report Sally Marshall Sally Marshall Nick James Maria Grant Chris Cox Jacqueline Whitworth-Allan 2.0 31.5.18 Final report Sally Marshall Sally Marshall Nick James Maria Grant 3.0 14.8.18 Final report Maria Grant Nick James Nick James following Nick James comments Stockport Landscape Character Assessment and Landscape Sensitivity Study Produced for Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report Prepared by LUC August 2018 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 12th Floor Colston Tower Edinburgh Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Lancaster 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 Background 1 Purpose of the Stockport Landscape Character Assessment 1 How was the Landscape Character Assessment prepared? 1 How is this report structured? 2 2 Introduction and background
    [Show full text]
  • SITESOLUTIONS Commercial
    SITESOLUTIONS Commercial Overall Opinion FURTHER ACTION Argyll's Overview Considering t!e in"orma ion reviewed d#ring t!is assessmen , pla#si%le con aminan linkages have %een iden i"ied and soil and groundwa er lia%ili ies could occ#r w!e !er or not redevelopmen is considered. Accordingly$ poten ial Lia%ili ies have %een iden i"ied under !e relevan con amina ed land legisla ion' The "ollowing ot!er Environmen al Ha(ards !ave been iden i"ied in !e immedia e vicini y of !e Si e: Radon %e ween * and 3%, -ining Ins a%ili y$ and Coal Mining. One or more Con rol of Repor on) Ma.or Acciden Ha(ards /COMAH0 si es are loca ed wi !in 500m. Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town, Sample County, United Kingdom Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report date: Sample Sample 3 ! 6ecem%er 52*1 Client Reference: National Grid Reference: Sample +32452$+32342 Si e Loca ion Report prepared on Sample Si e, Sample S ree , Sample Town$ Sample Coun y$ Uni ed Kingdom Site Area (m2 854+'93 Current Use Ind#s rial "roposed Use Ind#s rial Report Aut#or Ali S an on BA /Hons0 MSc AIEMA Telep!one: 0845 458 5252 www'argyllenvironmen al'com In elligen 6#e 6iligence Si e Sol# ions Commercial - Sample 5 3 ! <#ne 52*5 S#mmary o" Con amina ion Ris& and Lia%ili ies Lia%ili y Assessmen Read recommenda ions F#r !er ac ion Lia%ili y Assessmen =o en ial Lia%ili ies !ave %een iden i"ied #nder =ar 5A o" !e Environmen al =ro ec ion Ac *332 /or w!ere appropria e$ e>#ivalen re>#iremen s #nder !e planning regime0 and?or !e @a er Reso#rces Ac *33*' To >#an i"y !ese yo# may decide
    [Show full text]