DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Stockport SHLAA Report and Appendices 1 to 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Stockport SHLAA Report and Appendices 1 to 4 Stockport Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SHLAA 2018 Using a base date of 1 April 2018 December 2018 Table of Figures Figure 2.1 Net additional dwelling completions 2011 – 2018 3 Figure 3.1 Extract from the PPG showing suggested methodology 5 Figure 3.2 Gross / net developable area assumptions 13 Figure 3.3 Typical lead in times for sites delivering dwellings 14 Figure 3.4 Typical build rates for different sizes of development 14 Figure 3.5 Small sites delivery 16 Figure 4.1 Deliverable and developable sites 19 Figure 4.2 Stockport’s housing land supply 20 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Policy background.................................................................................................................... 2 National planning policy and guidance ........................................................................................ 2 Local policy context ..................................................................................................................... 2 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 5 Stage 1: Identification of broad location and sites ........................................................................ 6 The broad location of study ...................................................................................................... 6 Identification of sites and involvement of stakeholders ............................................................. 6 Site size ................................................................................................................................... 7 Site surveys ............................................................................................................................. 8 Stage 2: Site assessments/broad location assessment ............................................................... 9 Broad location assessment ...................................................................................................... 9 Suitability ............................................................................................................................... 10 Availability .............................................................................................................................. 11 Achievability ........................................................................................................................... 12 Constraint resolution .............................................................................................................. 12 Estimating potential yield ....................................................................................................... 13 Estimating lead in times and completions .............................................................................. 14 Stage 3: Windfall and small sites allowance .............................................................................. 15 Windfall sites .......................................................................................................................... 15 Small sites ............................................................................................................................. 15 Demolitions and losses .......................................................................................................... 16 Stage 4: Assessment review ..................................................................................................... 17 Stage 5: Forming the evidence base ......................................................................................... 17 4 Assessment results ................................................................................................................ 18 Number and nature of sites identified ........................................................................................ 18 Risk assessment ....................................................................................................................... 19 5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 21 Implications for planning policy .................................................................................................. 21 Monitoring and review ............................................................................................................... 21 Contact information ................................................................................................................... 21 Appendix 1: Sites that have been assessed as deliverable and developable ................................ 22 Appendix 2: Sites that are considered to be not developable ........................................................ 25 Sites already in residential use or have recently become part of residential supply ................... 25 Sites that have been assessed as being ‘not developable’ ........................................................ 31 Appendix 3: Development trajectory for sites with planning permission ......................................... 59 Appendix 4: Development trajectory for SHLAA Sites ................................................................... 70 Appendix 5: Pro formas for deliverable and developable sites ...................................................... 74 Stockport Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2018 1 Introduction 1.1 This document is Stockport Council’s 2018 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), which has been prepared with a base date of 1st April 2018 using information available during the study period (Autumn 2018). This SHLAA report provides an update to the data and housing numbers contained in the SHLAA 2017. 1.2 The key objectives of a SHLAA are: To assess land availability by identifying buildings or areas of land (including previously developed land and greenfield land) that have development potential for housing; To assess the potential level of housing that can be provided on identified land; To identify constraints that might make a particular site unavailable and/or unviable for development; and To assess which sites are likely to be deliverable and which are likely to be developable. 1.3 The following information is presented within this document: A list of all sites assessed, cross-referenced to their locations on maps; An assessment of each site, in terms of its suitability for development, availability and achievability including viability to determine whether a site is realistically expected to be developed and when; Detail on those sites which are considered to be realistic candidates for development, and the reasons why others have been discounted; The potential type and quantity of development that could be delivered on each site, including a reasonable estimate of build out rates, setting out how any barriers to delivery could be overcome and when; and An indicative trajectory of anticipated development and consideration of associated risks. 1.4 The SHLAA forms evidence for Stockport’s emerging Local Plan and the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework. 1.5 The inclusion of any site in this assessment does not indicate that it will necessarily be allocated or successfully obtain permission for housing. Conversely, the non- inclusion of a site in this study does not necessarily prevent future residential development. Any planning applications will continue to be treated on their individual merits, having regard to the appropriate policies of the Development Plan, and other material planning considerations. 1 Stockport Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2018 2 Policy background National planning policy and guidance 2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework 2018 (NPPF) requires planning policies to 1 be “underpinned by relevant and up-to-date evidence.” Paragraph 67 of the NPPF states that strategic policy-making authorities should prepare a SHLAA so that they have “A clear understanding of the land available in their area”. 2.2 Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) provides further detail on how a SHLAA should be produced, in the sub-section entitled: “Housing and economic land availability assessment”. It states that the assessment should be thorough but proportionate, 2 building where possible on existing information . The PPG recognises that the 3 assessment of land availability is an important step in the preparation of Local Plans , and contains a diagram (reproduced in section 3 of this document) which identifies the key stages of work that should be carried out by the Local Planning Authority. The approach to methodology is set out in section 3 of this report. 2.3 Due to the timetable for progressing work on both Stockport’s emerging Local Plan and the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF), an up-to-date understanding of potential residential urban capacity within Stockport is required. Currently, the most efficient way to do this is through the production of a standalone SHLAA, however work is being done to enable the combination of housing and economic considerations into a single report, thus bringing the evidence base for land availability fully up to date. Local policy context 2.4 The Stockport Core Strategy was adopted in March 2011, requiring a total of 7,200 net additional dwellings to be delivered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the North West Heritage Tourism Programme August 2008
    Evaluation of the North West Heritage Tourism Programme August 2008 Prepared for Culture Northwest By Mulrany, Church Road, Lilleshall, Shropshire, TF10 9HJ foster.mulrany@blueyonder.co.uk | 01952 604000 | 07973 337684 ‘each region, province, and country possess a common natural, built, human and non physical heritage which collectively it has to learn to recognise, appreciate, preserve and share’ François Le Blanc 1993 Tourism “the activities of persons travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes not related to the exercise of an activity remunerated from within the place visited” World Tourism Organisation and UN CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS………………………………………………………….(i) 1 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ......................................1 1.1 The Heritage Tourism Programme...........................................................................1 1.2 Background to the Project........................................................................................1 1.3 Heritage and the Region ..........................................................................................3 1.4 The Purpose of the Evaluation.................................................................................3 1.5 The Heritage Tourism Programme in Detail.............................................................3 1.6 Summary .................................................................................................................5 2 METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Polling Districts, Polling Places and Polling Stations Stage
    REVIEW OF POLLING DISTRICTS, POLLING PLACES AND POLLING STATIONS STAGE TWO CONSULATION RETURNING OFFICERS PROPOSALS Cheadle & Gatley (A) Existing arrangements Polling Electors Polling Place Disabled District access AA 2379 Trinity Methodist /United Reformed Church Yes Massie Street, Cheadle, Cheshire AB 1673 Mobile Polling Station Yes Oakwood Avenue AC 1243 Gatley Primary School, Hawthorn Road, Gatley Yes Cheadle AD 2014 The Kingsway School (Upper) Foxland Road, Yes Cheadle, AE 2503 Kingsway School (Lower) High Grove Road, Yes Cheadle AF 1596 The Bowling Pavilion, Gatley Recreation Ground, Yes Northenden Road. Returning officer’s proposal: No change Cheadle Hulme South (B) Existing arrangements Polling Electors Polling Place Disabled District access BA 1420 Bradshaw Hall Primary School, Vernon Close, Yes Cheadle Hulme BB 1678 United Reformed Church, Swann Lane, Cheadle Yes Hulme BC 2381 Bradshaw Hall Primary School, Vernon Close, Yes Cheadle Hulme BD 1480 Thorn Grove Primary School, Woodstock Avenue, Yes Cheadle Hulme BE 1480 St James RC High School Yes St James’ Way Cheadle Hulme BF 1978 The Methodist Church Schoolroom, Yes Station Road, Cheadle Hulme Returning officer’s proposal: No change D:\moderngov\data\published\Intranet\C00000117\M00000288\AI00002471\$jywnn5ae.doc Cheadle Hulme North (C) Existing arrangements Polling Electors Polling Place Disabled District access CA 1742 Queens Road Primary School, Buckingham Road, Yes Cheadle Hulme CB 1564 St. Cuthbert’s Church Yes Stockport Road CC 1556 All Hallows Church Yes 222 Councillor
    [Show full text]
  • Reddish Baths, Library & Community Centre Approved Planning Brief
    Planning Brief Reddish Library/Community Centre/Swimming Baths/Mortuary Reddish Stockport March 2009 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Planning Brief Reddish Library/Community Centre/Swimming Baths/Mortuary 1.0 OBJECTIVE 1.1 The purpose of this brief is to provide planning guidance to developers to guide the regeneration/development of this important site close to Reddish District Centre. This brief is prepared by the Regeneration Economic Development and Tourism Section, Environment and Economy Directorate in consultation with the Development Control Section, Planning Policy Section, and N.P.S. Property Consultants who are the Council’s Estates and Asset Management Advisors. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Location and Context (Plan1) This is a prominent site located on Gorton Road, 0.5 Km from Houldsworth Square and 1km from North Reddish Local Centre, and comprises 3 buildings plus an outbuilding with separate uses. The site is bounded by: to the north: by Spencer Street to the east: by unnamed passageway between Spencer Street and Melbourne Street to the south: by Melbourne Street to the west: by Gorton Road. 2.2 Opportunities This prominent group of civic buildings has significant townscape value: their public frontage to Gorton Road represents a local landmark and contributes positively to the quality and appearance of this part of Reddish, an area of predominantly residential housing that developed in the mid-late 19th century to serve local industries. 2 The group has a fine and imposing frontage, largely unaltered from its original design and external appearance. Whilst the interiors to the fire station, library and baths have all been altered to varying degrees, they still maintain a strong sense of their original character, form and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Strines- New Mills
    More Trips Out from Eccles Station J.E.Rayner 2010 Eighty two MARPLE –STRINES- NEW MILLS. This is an attractive stroll along the Goyt Valley. (For a very easy short walk go as far as Strines Station - trains back to Manchester every two hours so time your walk right). After Strines there is a relentless ascent to Brookbottom (the pub might be open!) followed by wide open views on the quiet lane to New Mills. Take the train to Manchester Victoria and from there a tram to Manchester Piccadilly Station. From here catch a train to Marple (NOT Rose Hill). Option: - turn right as you get off the tram and on Fairfield Street use the lift on the left to the link bridge lounge. STAGE I Alight at Marple Station. Go down the short approach road and turn left to Marple Bridge. Marple Bridge is an attractive stone village. The Midland is a free house selling cask marque real ales, tea, coffee, snacks and full meals. Cross the bridge over the River Goyt and turn right past the shops (The Royal Scot sells Robinson’s real ales). Fork right onto Lower Lea Road, and follow this. At the top of the gentle rise you see the hills ahead. Descend to a T with Lakes Road. Turn left along this. Follow it to the right in front of Bottoms Hall (Charmingly named, impressively sited - Georgian?). Next on the left are some lakes. Called Roman Lakes they are used for boating and fishing –take a look. Pass under the railway viaduct. On the right is a weir.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Stockport
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Stockport Report to The Electoral Commission September 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 355 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 45 Appendices A Final recommendations for Stockport: Detailed mapping 47 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 49 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Stockport 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Service Operational Plan
    Stockport Council Winter Service Operational Plan 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Gritting Priorities 3 Decision Matrix Guide 3 Treatment Matrix Guide 4 Grit Bins 5 Useful Contacts 5 Section1 – Carriageway 6 Routes Section 2 – Footway /off 26 road Cycle Routes Section 3 – Additional Grit 29 Locations Section 4 – Grit Bins 30 2 1. Introduction 1.1. This plan is to be used in conjunction with the most recent Winter Services Policy and the latest version of the Functional Network Hierarchy. 1.2. Within this plan are the current criteria for decision making and the current Carriageway Gritting Routes, Footway/Cycle Gritting Routes, Grit Box and additional Grit Locations. 2. Gritting Priorities 2.1. The criteria for gritting priorities are: 2.2. Routes 1 to 5 including ‘A’ roads, major bus routes and other key transport routes. 2.3. Routes 6 to 10 including secondary bus routes, routes to schools and district feeder roads that carry higher levels of traffic including sites with special circumstances e.g. severe gradients. 2.4. Designated East, West and North Area routes, trailer mounted and supervisor schedules include all other district bus routes and other district roads with steep gradients. 2.5. Current Spread rates and treatments to be used are: 3. Decision Matrix Guide Timing of treatment Treatment Type Freezing rain Salt Spreading Minor Ice Salt Spreading Salt During Snow Spreading/Ploughing Salt After Snow (Slush) Spreading/Ploughing Salt Spreading/Ploughing/ salt and abrasives After Snow (Compact spreading/Abrasives Snow/Ice) spreading NWSRG Practical Guide for Winter Service Treatments for Snow and Ice 3 4.
    [Show full text]
  • SITESOLUTIONS Commercial
    SITESOLUTIONS Commercial Overall Opinion FURTHER ACTION Argyll's Overview Considering t!e in"orma ion reviewed d#ring t!is assessmen , pla#si%le con aminan linkages have %een iden i"ied and soil and groundwa er lia%ili ies could occ#r w!e !er or not redevelopmen is considered. Accordingly$ poten ial Lia%ili ies have %een iden i"ied under !e relevan con amina ed land legisla ion' The "ollowing ot!er Environmen al Ha(ards !ave been iden i"ied in !e immedia e vicini y of !e Si e: Radon %e ween * and 3%, -ining Ins a%ili y$ and Coal Mining. One or more Con rol of Repor on) Ma.or Acciden Ha(ards /COMAH0 si es are loca ed wi !in 500m. Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town, Sample County, United Kingdom Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report date: Sample Sample 3 ! 6ecem%er 52*1 Client Reference: National Grid Reference: Sample +32452$+32342 Si e Loca ion Report prepared on Sample Si e, Sample S ree , Sample Town$ Sample Coun y$ Uni ed Kingdom Site Area (m2 854+'93 Current Use Ind#s rial "roposed Use Ind#s rial Report Aut#or Ali S an on BA /Hons0 MSc AIEMA Telep!one: 0845 458 5252 www'argyllenvironmen al'com In elligen 6#e 6iligence Si e Sol# ions Commercial - Sample 5 3 ! <#ne 52*5 S#mmary o" Con amina ion Ris& and Lia%ili ies Lia%ili y Assessmen Read recommenda ions F#r !er ac ion Lia%ili y Assessmen =o en ial Lia%ili ies !ave %een iden i"ied #nder =ar 5A o" !e Environmen al =ro ec ion Ac *332 /or w!ere appropria e$ e>#ivalen re>#iremen s #nder !e planning regime0 and?or !e @a er Reso#rces Ac *33*' To >#an i"y !ese yo# may decide
    [Show full text]
  • Economy & Regeneration
    Date 26 June 2018 Version 1.0 (Cabinet) Approved by KB ECONOMY & REGENERATION PORTFOLIO HOLDER’S INTRODUCTION This is my third annual Portfolio Agreement, which summarises the Economy & Regeneration Portfolio’s work programme and its intended outcomes for the next 12 months. The 2017/18 Annual Report was published last month and this Agreement sets out how we will build on the work described in that report to make our Borough an even better place to live, visit, work and do business. We are working hard to ensure that the Borough’s economy continues to grow, but we are now placing particular emphasis on ensuring this growth is inclusive growth – growth that benefits all sections of our community. Work and skills issues are a key part of this work and earlier this year we held a Work & Skills Commission involving a series of workshops with employers, workers & jobseekers (including young people) and educators & trainers. These aimed to identify the priorities that we need to focus on to ensure our residents have access to good jobs and our workforce has the skills our employers need. Findings from the Commission will inform a work programme for a new Work & Skills Board and I will report on the Board's work in my regular performance reports. Its work will link with and complement work underway in the Reform & Governance portfolio that is investigating factors that seem to trap some of our residents in poverty. Finding and sustaining a good job can be the key to escaping poverty, but ill health can be a barrier to employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Mill, Water Street, Portwood
    Application DC/063280 Reference DC/063281 Location: Meadow Mill, Water Street, Portwood, Stockport SK1 2BX PROPOSAL: Full and Listed building consent for: Conversion of part vacant Grade II listed former mill building into a mixed use development; comprising of 213 apartments on upper floors and 2208sqm of D2 (Leisure Use) and 200sqm A3 (Restaurant) use at ground floor level. Works include refurbishment and repair of the building, removal of existing roof and replacement of additional 7th floor in addition to upper floor extensions of the buildings northern and southern wings to accommodate additional 6th floors. Works to also include alterations to existing access, associated landscaping and creation of 173 car parking spaces within the buildings grounds. (Amended Scheme) Type Of DC/063280 Full Application Application: DC/063281 Listed Building Consent Registration Date: Expiry Date: Case Officer: Mr Steven Kirkham Applicant: William George Homes Agent: As per applicant DELEGATION/COMMITTEE STATUS PHRC decision. Residential Development in excess of 100 dwellings. Application referred to Central Area Committee for comment/recommendation. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This is a joint report to cover Full Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent that is being sought for the extension and conversion of Meadow Mill into a mixed use development of residential apartments and ground floor leisure space with associated landscaping, access and car parking works. The proposals represent an amendment to the original submission, this has resulted in changes to the upper floor extensions and a reduction from 217 apartments to 213. This was required in the interests of the conservation of the heritage asset. The proposals include a comprehensive refurbishment and repair of the existing mill building.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tfgm) Complaints Handling Procedure for Horwich Parkway Station
    Marcus Clements Head of Consumer Policy E-mail: CHP@orr.gov.uk 22 December 2020 Bob Morris Chief Operating Officer TfGM By Email Dear Bob, Approval of Transport for Greater Manchester’s Complaints Handling Procedure for Horwich Parkway station (Condition 6 of the Station Licence) Thank you for submitting Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM)’s draft Complaints Handling Procedure (CHP) for Horwich Parkway station for approval. I confirm that we have reviewed your CHP against the 2015 “Guidance on complaints handling procedures for licence holders” (the guidance), and can confirm that your revised CHP meets the requirements of Condition 6 of your station licence. We also sought views on your draft CHP from Transport Focus. We welcome your commitment to respond to 90% of complaints within 5 working days of acknowledgement, which we believe is likely to be positive for passengers. A copy of TfGM’s revised CHP is attached to this letter, and will be published on our website along with a copy of this letter. Yours sincerely, Marcus Clements Customer service policy How we handle complaints about our services at Horwich Parkway station 1 Contents Customer complaints handling procedure Customer complaints handling procedure ��������������������������������������������������� 3 Welcome to Transport for Greater We also consult with Transport Focus and Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 Manchester. Our complaints the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) on an annual basis
    [Show full text]
  • Heatons & Reddish Area Committee
    HEATONS & REDDISH AREA COMMITTEE Meeting: 9 November 2020 At: 6.00 pm PRESENT Councillor Roy Driver (Chair) in the chair; Councillor Dena Ryness (Vice-Chair); Councillors Kate Butler, Dean Fitzpatrick, Colin Foster, Yvonne Guariento, Tom McGee, Janet Mobbs, David Sedgwick, John Taylor, Jude Wells and David Wilson. 1. MINUTES The Minutes (copies of which had been circulated) of the meeting held o 30 September 2020 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillors and officers were invited to declare any interests they had in any of the items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations of interest were made. 3. URGENT DECISIONS No urgent decisions were reported. 4. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT (i) Chair's Announcements The Chair informed the Committee that an additional item had been included on the agenda, Item 11 – The Clean Air Plan. (ii) Public Question Time Members of the public were invited to put questions to the Chair of the Area Committee on any matters within the powers and duties of the Area Committee, subject to the exclusions set out in the Code of Practice. Two public questions were submitted in relation to road problems in Reddish Vale. Reddish Vale area road problems In response, it was stated that a member of the Area Committee had already informed the questioner of the date of the December Highways meeting where the issue will be raised. A formal response would be shared with the questioner and the Committee. Highways Agency adopting the road Heatons & Reddish Area Committee - 9 November 2020 In response, the Area Committee agreed to clarify whether the Highways Agency intended to adopt the road and noted that the issue had been raised with the appropriate body directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Closed Pubs Blight Area
    NOVEMBER 2006 NUMBER 267 Closed Pubs Blight Area ownscapes across the Opening Times area Tare increasingly being blighted by closed and often derelict buildings – courtesy of the major pub companies that now control many of the country’s public houses. In the days when most pubs were run by brewing Windors in Edgeley, Stockport – for sale but no buyers companies, not only would they change hands less frequently, but even if a permanent tenant could not be End of the Line for Railway? found the pubs would be kept running by relief licensees. While that remains the case with our local family brewers and some pub companies, the bigger operators seem to have little hesitation in closing pubs and sealing them with ugly steel shutters. Taking Stockport as an example, closed pubs at the moment include the Railway in North Reddish, the Grey Horse in South Reddish and Windsors in Edgeley – all occupying prominent sites in shopping or residential areas. Worst of the lot has to be the former Wellington (latterly TJ’s Bar) on Wellington Road South – the increasing dereliction of this building scars the town centre just as the Town Council is formulating grandiose improvement plans. Manchester fares just as badly in places – the closed Abbey Hey Hotel has featured in the Manchester Evening News’ ‘Get It Sorted’ column, while the Pomona in Gorton is little short of a disgrace. Even the booming City Centre Storm clouds gather over the Railway isn’t immune – the Punch Taverns’ shuttered Pig & Dave Porter has announced that the Railway on Porcupine at the end of Deansgate makes a sad Portwood is likely to close early next year.
    [Show full text]