Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment March 2010 Prepared for Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Revision Schedule Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment March 2010 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 Nov 2009 Draft Mark Crussell Michael Timmins Jon Robinson Assistant Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Specialist Alpha Robinson Principal Flood Risk Engineer Sam Rosillo Anita Longworth Graduate Planner Principal Planner 02 Dec 2009 Draft Rev2 Alpha Robinson Michael Timmins Jon Robinson Principal Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Engineer Specialist 03 March 2010 Final Alpha Robinson Michael Timmins Jon Robinson Principal Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Engineer Specialist Scott Wilson Brunel House 54 Princess Street Manchester M1 6HS United Kingdom Tel +44 (0)161 907 3500 Fax +44 (0)161 907 3501 www.scottwilson.com Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Policy Context and Background..................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Aims and Objectives of the Level 1 SFRA Update and Level 2 SFRA.......................................2 2 Sequential Approach to Site Allocation....................................................... 4 2.1 The Sequential Test....................................................................................................................4 2.2 Development Vulnerability ..........................................................................................................4 2.3 Flood Zone Definition ..................................................................................................................6 2.4 The Exception Test .....................................................................................................................7 3 Planning Context ........................................................................................... 8 4 SFRA Approach ............................................................................................. 9 4.1 General Approach .......................................................................................................................9 4.2 Level 1 Update ............................................................................................................................9 4.3 Level 2 SFRA Requirements ....................................................................................................10 4.4 Level 2 SFRA Output ................................................................................................................15 5 Level 1 SFRA Update................................................................................... 16 5.1 Flooding History ........................................................................................................................16 5.2 Level 1 Update of Fluvial Flooding across Stockport................................................................16 5.3 Pluvial Flood Risk (flooding from overland flow).......................................................................19 5.4 Sewer and Drainage Flood Risk ...............................................................................................20 5.5 Critical Drainage Areas .............................................................................................................22 5.6 Flood Risk from Man-Made/Artificial Sources – Canals ...........................................................23 5.7 Flood Risk from Man-Made/Artificial Sources – Reservoirs .....................................................25 5.8 Groundwater Flood Risk ...........................................................................................................27 6 Stockport Town Centre Level 2 SFRA........................................................ 29 6.1 Stockport Town Centre Development Plans.............................................................................29 6.2 Town Centre Level 2 Fluvial Flood Risk Assessment...............................................................30 6.3 Risk of Flooding from Other Sources........................................................................................36 7 SFRA Policies and Flood Risk Management ............................................. 37 7.2 District Wide SFRA Policies......................................................................................................37 7.3 Town Centre Specific SFRA Policies........................................................................................39 7.4 Flood Risk Management Options..............................................................................................42 8 Site Specific Flood Risk Assessment Guidance....................................... 45 8.2 Application of the Sequential Approach....................................................................................45 8.3 Building Design .........................................................................................................................46 8.4 Surface Water Management .....................................................................................................46 8.5 Residual Risk Mitigation............................................................................................................51 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 9 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................... 55 9.1 Conclusions...............................................................................................................................55 9.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................56 Appendix 1 Maps ...................................................................................................... 57 Appendix 2 Summary of Planning Data.................................................................. 58 Appendix 3 Flood Defence Inspection Report ....................................................... 59 Figures Figure 4-1: Hierarchical Approach to Flood Risk........................................................................................9 Figure 5-1: Overview of watercourses in the district ...............................................................................17 Figure 6-1: Long Section showing water levels along the Tame, Goyt and Mersey................................32 Figure 6-2: Stockport Town Centre Depth Hazard map for the 1% AEP event .......................................34 Figure 6-3 : Stockport Town Centre Depth Hazard map for the 1% AEP event plus Climate Change....35 Figure 6-4: Stockport Town Centre Depth Hazard map for the 0.1% AEP event ....................................36 Figure 7-1: Key Town Centre Regeneration Activity (Source: Future Stockport Review) ......................40 Figure 7-2: Comparison of flow hydrographs downstream of the Town Centre development boundary (defended and defended scenarios).........................................................................................................43 Tables Table 2-1: Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification ......................................................................................4 Table 2-2: Flood Risk Vulnerability and Flood Zone ‘Compatibility’..........................................................5 Table 4-1: Key to Depth Hazard...............................................................................................................15 Table 5-1: Potential breach vulnerability locations along canals within Stockport...................................24 Table 5-2: Watercourses where reservoirs are located upstream outside of the study area...................26 Table 5-3: Key Hydro geological Units in the Stockport MBC District......................................................28 Table 6-1: Examples of key developments and appropriate flood zones ................................................29 Table 8-1: Typical SuDS Components .....................................................................................................47 Table 8-2: Flood Proofing Options ..........................................................................................................52 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Stockport Level 1 Update and Stockport Town Centre Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Abbreviations ACRONYM DEFINITION AEP Annual Exceedance Probability AOD Above Ordnance Datum AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty ASTSWF Areas Susceptible To Surface Water Flooding BW British Waterways CDA Critical Drainage Area CFMP Catchment Flood Management Plan DEM Digital Elevation Model DPD Development Plan Documents EA Environment Agency EP English Partnerships FRA Flood Risk Assessment GIS Geographical Information
Recommended publications
  • 14-1676 Number One First Street
    Getting to Number One First Street St Peter’s Square Metrolink Stop T Northbound trams towards Manchester city centre, T S E E K R IL T Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale S M Y O R K E Southbound trams towardsL Altrincham, East Didsbury, by public transport T D L E I A E S ST R T J M R T Eccles, Wythenshawe and Manchester Airport O E S R H E L A N T L G D A A Connections may be required P L T E O N N A Y L E S L T for further information visit www.tfgm.com S N R T E BO S O W S T E P E L T R M Additional bus services to destinations Deansgate-Castle field Metrolink Stop T A E T M N I W UL E E R N S BER E E E RY C G N THE AVENUE ST N C R T REE St Mary's N T N T TO T E O S throughout Greater Manchester are A Q A R E E S T P Post RC A K C G W Piccadilly Plaza M S 188 The W C U L E A I S Eastbound trams towards Manchester city centre, G B R N E R RA C N PARKER ST P A Manchester S ZE Office Church N D O C T T NN N I E available from Piccadilly Gardens U E O A Y H P R Y E SE E N O S College R N D T S I T WH N R S C E Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale Y P T EP S A STR P U K T T S PEAK EET R Portico Library S C ET E E O E S T ONLY I F Alighting A R T HARDMAN QU LINCOLN SQ N & Gallery A ST R E D EE S Mercure D R ID N C SB T D Y stop only A E E WestboundS trams SQUAREtowards Altrincham, East Didsbury, STR R M EN Premier T EET E Oxford S Road Station E Hotel N T A R I L T E R HARD T E H O T L A MAN S E S T T NationalS ExpressT and otherA coach servicesO AT S Inn A T TRE WD ALBERT R B L G ET R S S H E T E L T Worsley – Eccles –
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns
    ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns A Roberts PhD 2016 ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns Amber Roberts o 2016 Contents 2 Acknowledgements 4 Abstract 5 21 01 Literature Review 53 02 Research Methods 81 Region’ 119 155 181 215 245 275 298 1 Acknowledgements 2 3 Abstract ‘What is the urban image of the north- western post-industrial town?’ 4 00 Introduction This research focuses on the urban image of North West English historic cultural images, the built environment and the growing the towns in art, urban planning and the built environment throughout case of Stockport. Tesis Introduction 5 urban development that has become a central concern in the towns. 6 the plans also engage with the past through their strategies towards interest in urban image has led to a visual approach that interrogates This allows a more nuanced understanding of the wider disseminated image of the towns. This focuses on the represented image of the and the wider rural areas of the Lancashire Plain and the Pennines. Tesis Introduction 7 restructuring the town in successive phases and reimagining its future 8 development of urban image now that the towns have lost their Tesis Introduction 9 Figure 0.1, showing the M60 passing the start of the River Mersey at Stockport, image author’s own, May 2013. 10 of towns in the North West. These towns have been in a state of utopianism. persistent cultural images of the North which the towns seek to is also something which is missing from the growing literature on Tesis Introduction 11 to compare the homogenous cultural image to the built environment models to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Stockport
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Stockport Report to The Electoral Commission September 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 355 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 45 Appendices A Final recommendations for Stockport: Detailed mapping 47 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 49 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Stockport 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • SITESOLUTIONS Commercial
    SITESOLUTIONS Commercial Overall Opinion FURTHER ACTION Argyll's Overview Considering t!e in"orma ion reviewed d#ring t!is assessmen , pla#si%le con aminan linkages have %een iden i"ied and soil and groundwa er lia%ili ies could occ#r w!e !er or not redevelopmen is considered. Accordingly$ poten ial Lia%ili ies have %een iden i"ied under !e relevan con amina ed land legisla ion' The "ollowing ot!er Environmen al Ha(ards !ave been iden i"ied in !e immedia e vicini y of !e Si e: Radon %e ween * and 3%, -ining Ins a%ili y$ and Coal Mining. One or more Con rol of Repor on) Ma.or Acciden Ha(ards /COMAH0 si es are loca ed wi !in 500m. Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town, Sample County, United Kingdom Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report date: Sample Sample 3 ! 6ecem%er 52*1 Client Reference: National Grid Reference: Sample +32452$+32342 Si e Loca ion Report prepared on Sample Si e, Sample S ree , Sample Town$ Sample Coun y$ Uni ed Kingdom Site Area (m2 854+'93 Current Use Ind#s rial "roposed Use Ind#s rial Report Aut#or Ali S an on BA /Hons0 MSc AIEMA Telep!one: 0845 458 5252 www'argyllenvironmen al'com In elligen 6#e 6iligence Si e Sol# ions Commercial - Sample 5 3 ! <#ne 52*5 S#mmary o" Con amina ion Ris& and Lia%ili ies Lia%ili y Assessmen Read recommenda ions F#r !er ac ion Lia%ili y Assessmen =o en ial Lia%ili ies !ave %een iden i"ied #nder =ar 5A o" !e Environmen al =ro ec ion Ac *332 /or w!ere appropria e$ e>#ivalen re>#iremen s #nder !e planning regime0 and?or !e @a er Reso#rces Ac *33*' To >#an i"y !ese yo# may decide
    [Show full text]
  • LFRMS Consultation Report Appendices
    Appendix A DRAFT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY DOCUMENT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR STOCKPORT February 2016 Foreword by Executive Member It is with great pleasure that we can present to the public the progress we have made and the improvements that we plan to undertake to re-establish Stockport Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority for the Stockport area. We have made great progress in a short period of time and this Strategy endorses that. I certainly accept the new duties and responsibilities the Council has to help our community and look forward to developing a closer relationship with residents and other multi-disciplined agencies with an interest in water and its impact on the built environment and natural environment. I welcome and applaud the support the Council has from its partners in risk management. The beauty, amenity and critical resource of water should certainly be appreciated but also acknowledged that the power of nature can deliver adverse effects that can have a huge impact on us all and for many years. The reality of major flood events in Stockport is relatively small in comparison to other areas, but some risk will remain in areas with large urbanisation and buried waterways. Flood risk management requires the support of all key stakeholders including local residents, organisations and businesses as we all have responsibilities. If we work together then the potential impacts of floods in Stockport can be minimised. 2 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Background 7 1.2. Aims of the Strategy Error! Bookmark not defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Upm Methodology
    USING THE UPM METHODOLOGY Graham Squibbs - North West Water Mark Bottomley and Richard Norreys - Montgomery Watson Introduction The Urban Pollution Management (UPM) studies undertaken by Montgomery Watson with North West Water (NWW)' formed the part of .North West Water's UPM programme within the Mersey Basin. These considered the impact of wastewater treatment work and CSO discharges from the sewer network on the receiving watercourses. These studies covered four areas surrounding and including parts of the City of Manchester being Oldham, to the north east of Manchester, part of Bolton to the north west, Salford to the west and the River Medlock catchment including part of Manchester, Droylesden and Failsworth . The catchments have a population in excess of 600 000 people and contain over 76 UCSOs, four wastewater treatment works requiring upgrading works as part of the National Environmental Programme and in excess of 20 different water courses. Tables 1 to 4 detail the studies. The studies were carried out by Montgomery Watson in conjunction with NWW input to a combined team. The UPM data collection programme covering flow and quality surveys was maintained as a single programme under NWW control. The project involved considerable modelling work. In the course of the studies : 14 HYDROWORKS sewer network quality models were built along with two Mike 11 river impact models and three STOAT wastewater treatment work models. In addition existing drainage area study network hydraulic models were upgraded to HYDROWORKS and reverified. UPM Methodology Urban Pollution Management' (UPM) concerns the management of wastewater discharges from urban sewerage and sewage treatment facilities under wet weather conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Point Source Pollution on an Urban River, the River
    The impact of point source pollution on an urban river, the River Medlock, Greater Manchester A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2016 Cecilia Medupin 1 Table of Contents The impact of point source pollution on an urban river, the River Medlock, Greater Manchester ...... 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ....................................................................................................... 1 2016 .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Cecilia Medupin ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Words and meanings ................................................................................................................................. 5 Declaration ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment “Living Document” – August 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester – Sub-Regional Report August 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 November DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 ISSUE Gemma Costin Michael Timmins David Dales Flood Risk Specialist Principal Flood Risk Director Specialist Fay Tivey Flood Risk Specialist Peter Richards Anita Longworth Planner Principal Planner 04 August 2008 FINAL Fay Tivey Michael Timmins David Dales Flood Risk Specialist Principal Flood Risk Director Specialist Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed United Kingdom to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool the Mersey Ferry
    AimAim • To learn about the River Mersey. SuccessSuccess Criteria • StatementI can locate 1 the Lorem River ipsum Mersey dolor on sita map amet of, consecteturthe UK. adipiscing elit. • StatementI can describe 2 the route of the River Mersey. • I can• Subgive statement information about places along the route. • I can give examples of different recreational activities which take place along the route. River Mersey Facts The River Mersey is 112km long (70 miles). Mersey means ‘boundary river’ in Anglo-Saxon. For centuries, the river formed part of the boundary between Lancashire and Cheshire. Many British Hindus consider the river to be sacred. Photo courtesy of ([email protected]) - granted under creative commons licence – attribution Where Is the River Mersey? The Course of the River Mersey The river is formed from three tributaries: the River Etherow (a tributary of the River Goyt), the River Goyt and the River Tame, which flows through Greater Manchester. The river starts at the confluence of the River Tame and River Goyt in Stockport, flowing through south Manchester, between Urmston and Sale, towards Warrington. Here it widens, before narrowing, as it passes by Runcorn and Widnes. From Runcorn, the river widens into a large estuary near Ellesmere Port. The Mersey finishes at Liverpool Bay, flowing into the Irish Sea. The Course Photo courtesy of ([email protected]) - granted under creative commons licence – attribution Stockport The River Goyt, which begins as a trickle high up in the Derbyshire hills, and the River Tame, which begins in Denshaw, Greater Manchester, merge together in Stockport to form the River Mersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Acknowledgements Contents
    THE CITY WATER RESILIENCE APPROACH CITY CHARACTERISATION REPORT GREATER MANCHESTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS On behalf of the study team, I would like to thank The 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rockefeller Foundation and The Resilience Shift for supporting this project. 6 BACKGROUND The CWRA is a joint effort developed in collaboration 10 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY with our project partners, the Stockholm International 12 UNDERSTANDING GREATER MANCHESTER’S WATER SYSTEM Water Institute (SIWI), along with city partners in Amman, Cape Town, Greater Miami and the Beaches, Mexico City, 16 ENGAGEMENT WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS Kingston upon Hull, Greater Manchester, Rotterdam and 18 Stakeholder Commentary Thessaloniki, and with contributions from 100 Resilient Cities and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and 24 Key Programmes Development (OECD). 26 CHARACTERISING RESILIENCE This project would not have been possible without the 28 Critical Interdependencies valued guidance and support of the CWRA Steering 31 Shocks and Stresses Group. Our thanks to the following: Fred Boltz (Resolute 36 Key Factors of Resilience Development Solutions), Casey Brown & Sarah Freeman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), Katrin Bruebach 44 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & Andrew Salkin (100 Resilient Cities), Jo da Silva (Arup), Nancy Kete & Juliet Mian (The Resilience Shift), Diego 46 REFERENCES Rodriguez & Maria Angelica Sotomayor (World Bank). MARK FLETCHER Arup Global Water Leader April 2019 The CWRA project team includes Pilar Avello (SIWI), George Beane (Arup), Kieran Birtill (Arup), James Bristow (Arup), Alexa Bruce (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Louise Ellis (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Sophie Fisher (Arup), Mark Fletcher (Arup), Caroline Karmann (Arup), Richard Gine (SIWI), Alejandro Jiménez (SIWI), James Leten (SIWI), Kathryn Pharr (Venturi Innovation), Oriana Romano (OECD), Iñigo Ruiz-Apilánez (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Panchali Saikia (SIWI), Martin Shouler (Arup) and Paul Simkins (Arup).
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Place (Print V8)
    BUILDING DESIRABLE HOMES ALBERT PLACE CHURCH LANE, MARPLE, SK6 7AY AN EXCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TWENTY APARTMENTS IN MARPLE TOWN CENTRE ALBERT PLACE MARPLE Albert Place is a luxury development of 20 two bedroom and two bathroom apartments in the sought after town of Marple, on the edge of the beautiful Peak District. An exciting place to live, work and enjoy life. These beautifully designed homes by Mansion House Group offer the ultimate in modern day living with a high specification throughout, landscaped grounds and secure parking. LOCATION Marple offers excellent connectivity, located near the A626 which runs between Glossop and Heaton Chapel town centre and within easy driving distance to Manchester City Centre and the Peak District National Park. The area has benefited greatly from the completion of the A6 Manchester Airport relief road. This has opened up access to the west including to the Airport, M56 and M6. The town is served by two railway stations: Marple Station and Rose Hill Marple Station located on the Hope Valley Line, with both providing services to Manchester Piccadilly Station. The town also has many bus services, most start and terminate at Stockport via Offerton and Bredbury. Albert Place to Marple Station 0.5miles (29 mins to Manchester) Albert Place to M60 Junction 26 20 mins by car Albert Place to Manchester Airport 20 mins by car Stalybridge Droylsden A6140 Manchester Dukinfield Audenshaw A57 Old Trafford A6017 A6 Gee Cross Heaton Chapel A34 M60 Woodley Bredbury Didsbury Compstall Romley M60 A627 A560 Stockport A626 Cheadle Heaviley Marple M56 A5102 A34 A6 Heald Green Manchester International A5149 High Lane Airport A523 Bramhall Handforth LOCATION MAP ABOUT THE AREA Marple is a small riverside town within the Metropolitan Borough of Stockport, in Greater Manchester.
    [Show full text]