DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Point Source Pollution on an Urban River, the River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Point Source Pollution on an Urban River, the River The impact of point source pollution on an urban river, the River Medlock, Greater Manchester A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2016 Cecilia Medupin 1 Table of Contents The impact of point source pollution on an urban river, the River Medlock, Greater Manchester ...... 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ....................................................................................................... 1 2016 .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Cecilia Medupin ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Words and meanings ................................................................................................................................. 5 Declaration ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Copyright Notice........................................................................................................................................ 6 The Author ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 8 Abstract 9 Chapter 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 10 1.1 COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS (CSOS) .................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1 CSOs and Environmental Regulation ............................................................................................. 14 1.2 PHYSICAL MODIFICATION ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.2.1 Channelisation ............................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.2 Examples of modification to the River Medlock ............................................................................. 17 1.3 RIVER ECOLOGY: IMPACTS OF PRECIPITATION .......................................................................................... 19 1.4 WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................................................................. 21 1.4.1 Physical and chemical characteristics of rivers................................................................................. 21 1.4.2 Biological characteristics of rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates .................................................. 22 1.5 WATER QUALITY IN THE RIVER MEDLOCK ....................................................................................... 25 1.5.1 Why study the impact of combined sewer overflows in the River Medlock? ..................................... 27 1.6 AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES ....................................................................................................... 28 1.6.1 Aims ............................................................................................................................................... 28 1.6.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.6.3 Hypotheses ................................................................................................................................. 29 1.7 OVERVIEW AND STRUCTURE OF THE EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH CHAPTERS ........................................... 29 Chapter 2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH .................................................................. 33 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION OF RIVER MEDLOCK .................................................................................................... 33 2.2 SAMPLING REGIME .................................................................................................................................... 34 2.3 FIELD AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 38 2.3.1 Benthic invertebrate sampling and analysis................................................................................... 43 2.3.1 Benthic invertebrate sampling ....................................................................................................... 43 2.3.2 Spatial and Statistical analysis ...................................................................................................... 44 2.4 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .................................................................................................................. 46 2.4.1 WFD Standards .............................................................................................................................. 46 2.4.2 Classification of Invertebrates..................................................................................................... 47 2 Chapter 3 LONG-TERM WATER QUALITY OF A HEAVILY URBANISED RIVER: A CASE STUDY OF RIVER MEDLOCK, GREATER MANCHESTER, UK .......................................................... 51 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 51 3.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 52 3.2 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH ............................................................................................................. 53 3.2.1 Study area ....................................................................................................................................... 53 3.2.2 Study sites and data collection......................................................................................................... 55 3.2.3 Water quality and ecological parameters ......................................................................................... 56 3.3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................... 58 3.3.1 Physical and chemical variables ....................................................................................................... 58 3.3.2 Benthic macroinvertebrates ............................................................................................................. 67 3.4 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 69 3.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................... 70 3.6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 72 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 73 3.7 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 73 Chapter 4 SOURCES OF PO4-P IN AN URBAN RIVER: COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS VS WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS .................................................................................................... 78 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 78 4.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 78 Study area: The River Medlock ................................................................................................................ 80 4.2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................................. 81 4.2.1 Low resolution long term EA data ................................................................................................... 81 4.2.2 Fortnightly spatial data .............................................................................................................. 84 4.2.3 Data collection ........................................................................................................................... 85 4.2.4 High resolution temporal dynamics ............................................................................................... 86 4.2.5 Data analysis..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hyporheic Handbook a Handbook on the Groundwater–Surface Water Interface and Hyporheic Zone for Environment Managers
    The Hyporheic Handbook A handbook on the groundwater–surface water interface and hyporheic zone for environment managers Integrated catchment science programme Science report: SC050070 The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research funded by NERC and supported by the Environment Agency’s Science Programme. Published by: Dissemination Status: Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Released to all regions Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Publicly available Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 www.environment-agency.gov.uk Keywords: hyporheic zone, groundwater-surface water ISBN: 978-1-84911-131-7 interactions © Environment Agency – October, 2009 Environment Agency’s Project Manager: Joanne Briddock, Yorkshire and North East Region All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Science Project Number: SC050070 The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the author alone. The views or statements Product Code: expressed in this publication do not necessarily SCHO1009BRDX-E-P represent the views of the Environment Agency and the Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for such views or statements. This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally chlorine free.
    [Show full text]
  • 14-1676 Number One First Street
    Getting to Number One First Street St Peter’s Square Metrolink Stop T Northbound trams towards Manchester city centre, T S E E K R IL T Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale S M Y O R K E Southbound trams towardsL Altrincham, East Didsbury, by public transport T D L E I A E S ST R T J M R T Eccles, Wythenshawe and Manchester Airport O E S R H E L A N T L G D A A Connections may be required P L T E O N N A Y L E S L T for further information visit www.tfgm.com S N R T E BO S O W S T E P E L T R M Additional bus services to destinations Deansgate-Castle field Metrolink Stop T A E T M N I W UL E E R N S BER E E E RY C G N THE AVENUE ST N C R T REE St Mary's N T N T TO T E O S throughout Greater Manchester are A Q A R E E S T P Post RC A K C G W Piccadilly Plaza M S 188 The W C U L E A I S Eastbound trams towards Manchester city centre, G B R N E R RA C N PARKER ST P A Manchester S ZE Office Church N D O C T T NN N I E available from Piccadilly Gardens U E O A Y H P R Y E SE E N O S College R N D T S I T WH N R S C E Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale Y P T EP S A STR P U K T T S PEAK EET R Portico Library S C ET E E O E S T ONLY I F Alighting A R T HARDMAN QU LINCOLN SQ N & Gallery A ST R E D EE S Mercure D R ID N C SB T D Y stop only A E E WestboundS trams SQUAREtowards Altrincham, East Didsbury, STR R M EN Premier T EET E Oxford S Road Station E Hotel N T A R I L T E R HARD T E H O T L A MAN S E S T T NationalS ExpressT and otherA coach servicesO AT S Inn A T TRE WD ALBERT R B L G ET R S S H E T E L T Worsley – Eccles –
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Streams in an Urbanizing World
    Freshwater Biology (2007) 52, 738–751 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x Restoring streams in an urbanizing world EMILY S. BERNHARDT* AND MARGARET A. PALMER† *Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A. †Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. The world’s population is increasingly urban, and streams and rivers, as the low lying points of the landscape, are especially sensitive to and profoundly impacted by the changes associated with urbanization and suburbanization of catchments. 2. River restoration is an increasingly popular management strategy for improving the physical and ecological conditions of degraded urban streams. In urban catchments, management activities as diverse as stormwater management, bank stabilisation, channel reconfiguration and riparian replanting may be described as river restoration projects. 3. Restoration in urban streams is both more expensive and more difficult than restoration in less densely populated catchments. High property values and finely subdivided land and dense human infrastructure (e.g. roads, sewer lines) limit the spatial extent of urban river restoration options, while stormwaters and the associated sediment and pollutant loads may limit the potential for restoration projects to reverse degradation. 4. To be effective, urban stream restoration efforts must be integrated within broader catchment management strategies. A key scientific and management challenge is to establish criteria for determining when the design options for urban river restoration are so constrained that a return towards reference or pre-urbanization conditions is not realistic or feasible and when river restoration presents a viable and effective strategy for improving the ecological condition of these degraded ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Urban Stream Restoration and Flood Protection with Principles of Natural Channel Design and Fluvial Geomorphology
    2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, June 27 - July 1, 2010 Innovative Urban Stream Restoration and Flood Protection with Principles of Natural Channel Design and Fluvial Geomorphology David Bidelspach PE, MS MEng, [email protected], 919-218-0864 754 Mount Mahogany Livermore, CO 80536 Stable streams are defined to be in a state of dynamic equilibrium. The natural processes of a stream will result in a channel that is not set in place but has a natural adjustment, bank migration rates, erosion and deposition. Changes is the flow regime, sediment supply, slope and substrate can cause local channel instabilities that can lead to systematic reach wide instability and possible channel evolutions. Many urban stream restoration projects can be good examples and experimentations of the effect of changes in flow regimes that affect sedimentation and erosion rates. Urban Streams are always being adjusted by backwater, changes in sediment supply, increased runoff, canalization, removal of vegetation and bed armoring. Any stream restoration should evaluate the causes of channel instability and the potential for the channel to recover and return to a dynamic equilibrium. Urban streams systems typically have channel instability and enlargement that can result in risk to structures, lose of land, and increase flood stage. Urban channels have also been widened with the goal of increased flood conveyance, which can lead to long term aggradation and channel instability. The major goal of urban stream restoration projects are usually trying to create a stable restored channel with unstable and conflicting boundary conditions. Other goals of urban stream restoration projects include limiting flood risk, increase public use, increase habitat, property protection, mitigation and aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Upm Methodology
    USING THE UPM METHODOLOGY Graham Squibbs - North West Water Mark Bottomley and Richard Norreys - Montgomery Watson Introduction The Urban Pollution Management (UPM) studies undertaken by Montgomery Watson with North West Water (NWW)' formed the part of .North West Water's UPM programme within the Mersey Basin. These considered the impact of wastewater treatment work and CSO discharges from the sewer network on the receiving watercourses. These studies covered four areas surrounding and including parts of the City of Manchester being Oldham, to the north east of Manchester, part of Bolton to the north west, Salford to the west and the River Medlock catchment including part of Manchester, Droylesden and Failsworth . The catchments have a population in excess of 600 000 people and contain over 76 UCSOs, four wastewater treatment works requiring upgrading works as part of the National Environmental Programme and in excess of 20 different water courses. Tables 1 to 4 detail the studies. The studies were carried out by Montgomery Watson in conjunction with NWW input to a combined team. The UPM data collection programme covering flow and quality surveys was maintained as a single programme under NWW control. The project involved considerable modelling work. In the course of the studies : 14 HYDROWORKS sewer network quality models were built along with two Mike 11 river impact models and three STOAT wastewater treatment work models. In addition existing drainage area study network hydraulic models were upgraded to HYDROWORKS and reverified. UPM Methodology Urban Pollution Management' (UPM) concerns the management of wastewater discharges from urban sewerage and sewage treatment facilities under wet weather conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Acknowledgements Contents
    THE CITY WATER RESILIENCE APPROACH CITY CHARACTERISATION REPORT GREATER MANCHESTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS On behalf of the study team, I would like to thank The 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rockefeller Foundation and The Resilience Shift for supporting this project. 6 BACKGROUND The CWRA is a joint effort developed in collaboration 10 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY with our project partners, the Stockholm International 12 UNDERSTANDING GREATER MANCHESTER’S WATER SYSTEM Water Institute (SIWI), along with city partners in Amman, Cape Town, Greater Miami and the Beaches, Mexico City, 16 ENGAGEMENT WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS Kingston upon Hull, Greater Manchester, Rotterdam and 18 Stakeholder Commentary Thessaloniki, and with contributions from 100 Resilient Cities and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and 24 Key Programmes Development (OECD). 26 CHARACTERISING RESILIENCE This project would not have been possible without the 28 Critical Interdependencies valued guidance and support of the CWRA Steering 31 Shocks and Stresses Group. Our thanks to the following: Fred Boltz (Resolute 36 Key Factors of Resilience Development Solutions), Casey Brown & Sarah Freeman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), Katrin Bruebach 44 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & Andrew Salkin (100 Resilient Cities), Jo da Silva (Arup), Nancy Kete & Juliet Mian (The Resilience Shift), Diego 46 REFERENCES Rodriguez & Maria Angelica Sotomayor (World Bank). MARK FLETCHER Arup Global Water Leader April 2019 The CWRA project team includes Pilar Avello (SIWI), George Beane (Arup), Kieran Birtill (Arup), James Bristow (Arup), Alexa Bruce (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Louise Ellis (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Sophie Fisher (Arup), Mark Fletcher (Arup), Caroline Karmann (Arup), Richard Gine (SIWI), Alejandro Jiménez (SIWI), James Leten (SIWI), Kathryn Pharr (Venturi Innovation), Oriana Romano (OECD), Iñigo Ruiz-Apilánez (Arup / The Resilience Shift), Panchali Saikia (SIWI), Martin Shouler (Arup) and Paul Simkins (Arup).
    [Show full text]
  • River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater
    River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater Manchester Combined Authority Water body output maps LIFE Integrated Project LIFE14IPE/UK/027 The Irwell Management Catchment Water body ID Water body Name GB112069064660 Irwell (Source to Whitewell Brook) GB112069064670 Whitewell Brook GB112069064641 Irwell (Cowpe Bk to Rossendale STW) GB112069064680 Limy Water GB112069064650 Ogden GB112069064620 Irwell (Rossendale STW to Roch) GB112069064610 Kirklees Brook GB112069060840 Irwell (Roch to Croal) GB112069061451 Irwell (Croal to Irk) GB112069064720 Roch (Source to Spodden) GB112069064690 Beal GB112069064730 Spodden GB112069064600 Roch (Spodden to Irwell) GB112069064710 Naden Brook GB112069061250 Whittle Brook (Irwell) GB112069064570 Eagley Brook GB112069064560 Astley Brook (Irwell) GB112069064530 Tonge GB112069064540 Middle Brook GB112069064550 Croal (including Blackshaw Brook) GB112069061161 Irk (Source to Wince Brook) GB112069061120 Wince Brook GB112069061131 Irk (Wince to Irwell) GB112069061452 Irwell / Manchester Ship Canal (Irk to confluence with Upper Mersey) GB112069061151 Medlock (Source to Lumb Brook) GB112069061152 Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell) GB112069061430 Folly Brook and Salteye Brook. GB112069064580 Bradshaw Brook Click on a water body to navigate to that map Water body name Issues: Comments provided during the Opportunity theme symbols Workshop on the 10th February • Lists the issues in the water Fisheries – barrier removal body and their causes Physical modifications Opportunities: • Based on the issues what Water quality are the main opportunities for the Partnership. This excludes water company issues and the Mitigation Measures Actions as these are presented as other opportunities below. Map of the waterbody indicating the location of Irwell Catchment Partnership Projects, Mitigation Measures Actions, Environment Agency sampling locations, Mitigation Measure Actions: consented discharges, and priority barriers for eel. • A list of the Mitigation Measures Actions identified in the water body by the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Urban Development on Floods
    ������� ��� � �������� ����� Effects of Urban Development on Floods Over the past century, the United Even in suburban areas, where lawns States has become an increasingly and other permeable landscaping may urban society. The changes in land use be common, rainfall and snowmelt can associated with urban development saturate thin soils and produce overland affect flooding in many ways. Removing flow, which runs off quickly. Dense vegetation and soil, grading the land networks of ditches and culverts in cities surface, and constructing drainage reduce the distance that runoff must travel networks increase runoff to streams from overland or through subsurface flow paths rainfall and snowmelt. As a result, the to reach streams and rivers. Once water peak discharge, volume, and frequency enters a drainage network, it flows faster of floods increase in nearby streams. Flooding in Hickory Hills, Illinois, prompted than either overland or subsurface flow. Changes to stream channels during urban the construction of a reservoir to control With less storage capacity for water development can limit their capacity to runoff from upstream areas. Source: Loren in urban basins and more rapid runoff, convey floodwaters. Roads and buildings Wobig, Illinois Office of Water Resources. urban streams rise more quickly during constructed in flood-prone areas are storms and have higher peak discharge exposed to increased flood hazards, rainfall and snowmelt. Construction rates than do rural streams. In addition, including inundation and erosion, as new of roads and buildings often involves the total volume of water discharged development continues. Information about removing vegetation, soil, and depressions during a flood tends to be larger for streamflow and how it is affected by land from the land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Oldham LDF: Joint DPD - Proposed Submission 1 About This Document
    Oldham Local Development Framework 'Proposed Submission' Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document September 2010 1 About this document 3 2 Introduction and Spatial Portrait 4 3 Vision 26 4 Objectives 31 5 Part 1: Core Strategy - The Way Forward 34 The Preferred Way Forward for the LDF 34 Key Diagram 40 Policy 1 Climate Change and Sustainable Development 41 Policy 2 Communities 45 Policy 3 An Address of Choice 48 Policy 4 Promoting Sustainable Regeneration and Prosperity 53 Policy 5 Promoting Accessibility and Sustainable Transport Choices 55 Policy 6 Green Infrastructure 59 Policy 7 Sustainable Use of Resources - Waste Management 64 Policy 8 Sustainable Use of Resources - Minerals 66 6 Part 2: Development Management Policies 68 Policy 9 Local Environment 68 Policy 10 Affordable Housing 72 Policy 11 Housing 75 Policy 12 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 77 Policy 13 Employment Areas 79 Policy 14 Supporting Oldham's Economy 83 Policy 15 Centres 88 Policy 16 Local Services and Facilities 93 Policy 17 Gateways and Corridors 95 Policy 18 Energy 99 Policy 19 Water and Flooding 106 Policy 20 Design 109 Policy 21 Protecting Natural Environmental Assets 112 Policy 22 Protecting Open Land 118 Policy 23 Open Spaces and Sports 120 Policy 24 Historic Environment 125 Policy 25 Developer Contributions 128 Appendix 1 Monitoring Framework 130 Appendix 2 The Preferred Way Forward for the LDF 142 Appendix 3 Energy Target Framework 162 Appendix 4 Proposals Map changes 164 Appendix 5 Flood Risk Maps 197 Appendix 6 Primary Shopping Frontages 198 Appendix 7 Bulky Goods Schedule 199 Oldham LDF: Joint DPD - Proposed Submission 1 About this document If you would like to receive this information in another format, such as large print, Braille, audio or alternative languages, please call us on telephone number 0161 770 4061.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment
    Review of discharge consents. River Irwell catchment report Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 25/09/2021 14:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27235 RSD2/A20 REVIEW OF DISCHARGE CONSENTS IRWELL CATCHMENT REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description of Catchment 3. River Water - Chemical Classification 4 . Discharges and Consents 4.1 Authority Sewage Treatment Works 4.2 Authority Trade Effluent Discharges 4.3 Private Trade Effluent Discharges 4.4 Private Sewage Treatment Works 4 .5 Storm Sewage Overflows 5. Special Cases MARCH 1979 Introduction The purpose of this Report is to make recommendations for the revision of consents for discharges within the catchment of the River Irwell, downstream to and including the River Medlock in Manchester. This revision has the sole objective of recognising the present effluent and river water quality - proposals for long term river water quality objectives are to be put forward in other Reports. The report identifies the existing situation regarding the legal status of effluent discharges from Authority and non-Authority owned installations within the catchment, details the determinand concentration limits included in existing discharge consents (where appropriate) and proposes the limits to be included in the reviewed consents. The reviewed consents will reflect the quality of efflu­ ent achievable by good operation of the existing plant based on 1977 effluent quality data but taking into account any improvements, extensions etc. that have been or are about to be carried out and any known further industrial and/or housing development in the works drainage area. The proposed limits are intended to be the 95% compliance figures rather than the 80% compliance figures inferred in existing consents and hence the new figures will obviously be higher than the old.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Stormwater and Watersheds I-2 IMPACT of URBANIZATION on STREAM QUALITY
    Introduction to Stormwater and Watersheds I-2 IMPACT OF URBANIZATION ON STREAM QUALITY AT A GLANCE Urbanization alters the natural processes in streams, lakes and rivers. Urban watersheds produce more stormwater runoff and deliver it more quickly to streams compared to rural watersheds. Urban stream channel erosion, loss of riparian buffers warmer stream temperatures and toxic pollutants reduce fish and aquatic insect abundance and diversity. Understanding the impacts of imperviousness on stream quality can help watershed managers prioritize restoration efforts. HOW URBANIZATION ALTERS WATERSHEDS Watersheds are continually transformed by human activities. These changes impact the way water moves through a watershed and ultimately leads to the loss of stream health. As forests are cleared and farms are converted to housing developments, permeable surfaces are replaced by rooftops, roads and parking lots. This increase in impervious cover fundamentally alters the watershed’s hydrology. Rainfall, once intercepted by tree canopy and absorbed by the ground, is now converted to surface runoff. Increased impervious surface means more rainfall is converted Consequently, urban streams experience more to surface runoff. frequent and severe flooding. Meanwhile, stream flow during dry weather often declines over time because the groundwater is no longer being recharged. Urbanization significantly impacts stream health in six key ways, summarized in the table below. Each impact is interrelated and can range in severity depending on the degree to which the watershed has been developed. Impervious cover is often used as a general index of the intensity of subwatershed development, and can be used to help make watershed management and restoration A hydrograph shows the flow rate in a stream over time after a rain event.
    [Show full text]