Durham E-Theses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses Ancillary space in Anglo-Saxon churches Wickham-Crowley, Kelley Marie How to cite: Wickham-Crowley, Kelley Marie (1992) Ancillary space in Anglo-Saxon churches, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5812/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM ANCILLARY SPACE IN ANGLO-SAXON CHURCHES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY BY KELLEY MARIE WICKHAM-CROWLEY 1992 2 DEC m Kelley Marie wlckham-Crowlay Anclllaxy__Snace in Ang^Lo-Saxon Churches M. A .*Yi Arcftaeoiogy.o; 1992 - This thesis examines documentary, architectural and archaeological evidence for ancillary space and its range of possible uses. Ancillary space (additions to the basic church form of nave and chancel) would be added based on liturgical or secular need and available resources. Three areas of additions are classified by form and correlated with possible uses. An appendix after each chapter gives detailed descriptions and speculations on specific churches. Notably, all three groups seem to have both autonomous and integrated functions, but autonomous functions predominate. Chapter one deals with porticus, aisles and transepts. Uses include burial chambers, chapels, meditation chambers, libraries, lodgings, and places of sanctuary and storage. These forms are those most likely to be restricted to clerical use or shared by clergy and laity. Chapter two examines the development of the west end and its use for burials and chapels again, penitents, catechumens, baptism rites, and liturgical elaboration centering on increasing attention to relics. The acquisition of relics emerges as the single most important factor in the development of the west end. Chapter three deals with the tower, a singularly symbolic form in Christianity that invokes, among others, the images of the Last Supper and the heavenly Jerusalem. The range of uses makes it the addition most likely to have combined secular and religious functions. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 11 Methods and Objectives Influences on Thought and Architecture The Architectural and Archaeological Remains of the Period Notes on Format and Abbreviations PHOTOGRAPHS 25 Chapter 1. PORTICUS, AISLES AND TRANSEPTS 47 I. Archaeological Evidence and Classification North Porticus South Porticus North and South Porticus Aisles and Lateral Porticus Transepts and Porticus off Crossing II. Textual Evidence Burial and Chapels Separation of the Sexes Porticus for Meditation and as Libraries Porticus as Lodgings Porticus and Sanctuary Liturgical Use: Storage and Security 3 APPENDIX A 100 2. THE WEST END 122 I. Archaeological Evidence and Classification West Annexes Two-Storey West Porches West Chambers of Width Equal to Their Naves Porches Raised to Towers Narthexes Galleries Proposed Placement of Galleries II. Textual Evidence Western Burials Western Chapels Penitents and the West End Catechumens and Baptism The West End and Church Ritual Galleries APPENDIX B 159 3. TOWERS 176 I. Classification Churches with West Towers Churches with Central or Axial Towers Round Towers Problematic Towers II. Textual Evidence 1. Parallels and Symbolism 2. Uses of Anglo-Saxon Towers Storage and Treasuries Legal Proceedings, Secular and Religious Instruction Dungeons and Defense Towers as Vantage Points Belfries Church Feasts and Fairs Towers for the Display of Relics Chapels in Towers Towers as Naves Miscellaneous Liturgical Uses Conclusions APPENDIX C 228 BIBLIOGRAPHY 286 5 LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS PLATE PAGE 1. Barnack tower 25 tower from southwest west face animal head west face upper opening 2. Barnack tower 26 first stage, south opening second stage, south 3. Barnack tower 27 second stage, west second stage, north 4. Barnack 28 Victorian sketch, south sculpture interior view of west end 5. Barnack 29 interior, west niche/seat interior, west aumbries 6. Brigstock 30 west tower and turret from southwest upper south face of tower 7. Brigstock south aisle 31 Corbridge west doorways 8. Brixworth 32 lower tower and turret on south exterior, wall of nave on south PHOTOGRAPHS, CONTINUED PLATE PAGE 9. Brixworth 33 external vestiges of narthex, north lower tower and turret on north 10. Brixworth 34 exterior, northeast nave wall and door exterior, north nave wall offset 11. Brixworth 35 interior, view from west upper chamber interior, west chamber column 12. Brixworth 36 interior, west chamber window details interior, west chamber, aumbry? 13. Bywell 37 St. Peter, north porticus indications St. Andrew, west tower from south St. Andrew, upper south doorway in tower 14. Earl's Barton, tower from southwest 38 Kirk Hammerton, south porticus doorway 15. Victoria and Albert ivory box/pyx 39 Escomb, north porticus doorway 16. Jarrow 40 tower from north north view of nave wall and lower tower PHOTOGRAPHS, CONTINUED PLATE PAGE 17. Jarrow 41 north nave wall exterior, north nave doorway 18. Jarrow 42 tower from south south tower window 19. Jarrow 43 exterior, south upper doorway exterior, south lower doorways 20. Jarrow, interior, south upper doorway 44 from east from west Monkwearmouth, tower from west 21. Staindrop, upper west doorway in nave 45 Hough-on-the-Hill, south entrance, west tower No material contained in this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree in this or any other university, nor does it contain any results from joint research. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without her prior written consent and information derived from it must be acknowledged. 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to Professor Robert T. Farrell of Cornell, for his generous encouragement and support, and for the initial suggestion of study in England and application to the Marshall Commission. I thank also the Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission for choosing me as a Marshall scholar in 1981 and for supporting me in Durham for the next two years. Special thanks to Professor Rosemary Cramp for her rigorous expertise, a trip around southern churches, and a letter of access to the library of the Society of Antiquaries in London, in addition to her academic supervision while I worked in Durham. Thanks, too, to my teachers while at Durham, among them especially Mr. Christopher Morris and Mr. James Lang. My appreciation to the staff of the Society of Antiquaries library for their help in my visit during July, 1983. Mr. Tom Middlemass kindly gave me permission to use two of his photographs, and thanks to his skill and meticulous work, the plates in this thesis are far more professional than I could have managed on my own. My deepest gratitude remains for my husband Tim. He accompanied me to England with no promise of employment or access to collections in his own academic specialty. He has continued to help and support me during the years of completing this research amidst my Ph.D. work at Cornell and several necessary but less than satisfying jobs. For his faith and generosity, I dedicate this thesis to him. 11 GENERAL INTRODUCTION METHODS AND OBJECTIVES The special focus of this thesis is ancillary space in Anglo- Saxon churches, that is, rooms and levels added to the nave and chancel presumably to answer a particular need in a given church. The most basic form of a church requires space only for the clergy (chancel) and for the laity (the nave). Any other space would be added based on liturgical or secular need and available resources in a given area or time. I have examined both documentary and archaeological information in the hope that integrating the two would explain more about the remains than their physical examination allows. By the term documentary, I mean to include not simply the histories of individual churches and sites, something usually incorporated into archaeological investigation, but also sources which provide more of the Anglo-Saxon and Christian cultural outlooks. Among these I number the laws, church canons and pastoral letters, saints' lives, and synod records. While such sources may arguably be questioned at times as too general or irrelevant to architecture, by placing the sources next to isolated portions of a church (porticus, towers, narthex) I attempted to correlate possible uses with surviving evidence. The results are not always to argue that such places in a particular building were used as described, but to make concrete the possible range of uses in the churches for which we have remains, based on contemporary sources and their implications. 12 To date, the development of the form of Anglo-Saxon churches, their evolution, remains more a series of inferences from the published scholarly works than a topic examined in detail. While { Continental scholars such as Heitz ^attempt to reconstruct the relationship between liturgy and architecture, much of the effort in the study of Anglo-Saxon churches as a whole has been centered on determining which churches of those remaining actually belong to the period and what their chronology might be. Some scholars (e.g. Gem 1975; Taylor 1975b) have tried to look at specific periods of building, relating the circumstances of an historical era to the remnants and facts we have.
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ampney St Peter Drainage Strategy Stage 1 - Initialise/Prepare Introduction
    Ampney St Peter Drainage Strategy Stage 1 - Initialise/Prepare Introduction Why sewer flooding Britain’s first sewerage systems were challenges arising in our predominantly This document contains: constructed 150 years ago in the rural catchments in the Thames Valley, Victorian era, and have served us well for Surrey and Kent. • an Introduction to the work generations. The sewer network Thames we are undertaking to Water operates today has been much A number of factors including population alleviate sewer flooding in improved and vastly extended over the growth, less frequent but heavier rainfall, years; yet it remains under increasing the urbanisation of green spaces and our region pressure. changes in agricultural land practices, • a Feedback: Q&A section and utilised machinery, occasionally addressing key questions Everyday our network manages the overwhelm our sewer network. The result from customers and demands of one of the world’s busiest can be unwanted sewer flooding for stakeholders and most densely populated capital customers and our neighbouring natural • the Ampney St Peter cities, and its urbanised surrounding environments. areas; together with the equally complex Drainage Strategy technical document. What can be done and when? Sewer flooding is unacceptable. We have to produce a drainage strategy for our undertaken extensive customer research affected catchments with a primary focus and initiated a programme of work to on our sewerage network. As outlined improve drainage and alleviate sewer in Figure 1, the strategies will develop flooding issues across our region. throughout the 4-stage framework to define how we intend to alleviate sewer We are adopting the good practice flooding or to address growth related Drainage Strategy framework* developed issues in each area sustainably, and by the Environment Agency and Ofwat, economically, over the next few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021
    BRECKLAND COUNCIL NOTICE OF SETTING OF COUNCIL TAX Notice is hereby given that on the twenty seventh day of February 2020 Breckland Council, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, approved and duly set for the financial year beginning 1st April 2020 and ending on 31st March 2021 the amounts as set out below as the amount of Council Tax for each category of dwelling in the parts of its area listed below. The amounts below for each parish will be the Council Tax payable for the forthcoming year. COUNCIL TAX RATES 2020 - 2021 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H NORFOLK COUNTY 944.34 1101.73 1259.12 1416.51 1731.29 2046.07 2360.85 2833.02 KENNINGHALL 1194.35 1393.40 1592.46 1791.52 2189.63 2587.75 2985.86 3583.04 NORFOLK POLICE & LEXHAM 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72 175.38 204.61 233.84 263.07 321.53 379.99 438.45 526.14 CRIME COMMISSIONER BRECKLAND 62.52 72.94 83.36 93.78 114.62 135.46 156.30 187.56 LITCHAM 1214.50 1416.91 1619.33 1821.75 2226.58 2631.41 3036.25 3643.49 LONGHAM 1229.13 1433.99 1638.84 1843.70 2253.41 2663.12 3072.83 3687.40 ASHILL 1212.28 1414.33 1616.37 1818.42 2222.51 2626.61 3030.70 3636.84 LOPHAM NORTH 1192.57 1391.33 1590.09 1788.85 2186.37 2583.90 2981.42 3577.70 ATTLEBOROUGH 1284.23 1498.27 1712.31 1926.35 2354.42 2782.50 3210.58 3852.69 LOPHAM SOUTH 1197.11 1396.63 1596.15 1795.67 2194.71 2593.74 2992.78 3591.34 BANHAM 1204.41 1405.14 1605.87 1806.61 2208.08 2609.55 3011.01 3613.22 LYNFORD 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
    County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 Socc Stakeholder Mailing List
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 SoCC Stakeholder Mailing List Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 5.1 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: BECG Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Parish Councils Bacton and Edingthorpe Parish Council Witton and Ridlington Parish Council Brandiston Parish Council Guestwick Parish Council Little Witchingham Parish Council Marsham Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Lexham Parish Council Yaxham Parish Council Whinburgh and Westfield Parish Council Holme Hale Parish Council Bintree Parish Council North Tuddenham Parish Council Colkirk Parish Council Sporle with Palgrave Parish Council Shipdham Parish Council Bradenham Parish Council Paston Parish Council Worstead Parish Council Swanton Abbott Parish Council Alby with Thwaite Parish Council Skeyton Parish Council Melton Constable Parish Council Thurning Parish Council Pudding Norton Parish Council East Ruston Parish Council Hanworth Parish Council Briston Parish Council Kempstone Parish Council Brisley Parish Council Ingworth Parish Council Westwick Parish Council Stibbard Parish Council Themelthorpe Parish Council Burgh and Tuttington Parish Council Blickling Parish Council Oulton Parish Council Wood Dalling Parish Council Salle Parish Council Booton Parish Council Great Witchingham Parish Council Aylsham Town Council Heydon Parish Council Foulsham Parish Council Reepham
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural and Functional/Liturgical Development of the North-West Church in Hippos (Sussita) 148 JOLANTA MŁYNARCZYK
    CENTRE D’ARCHÉOLOGIE MÉDITERRANÉENNE DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXII 2008 JOLANTA MŁYNARCZYK Architectural and Functional/Liturgical Development of the North-West Church in Hippos (Sussita) 148 JOLANTA MŁYNARCZYK In July 2007, the eighth season of excavations was completed at the so-called North- West Church at Hippos (Sussita), one of the cities of the Decapolis. The church was explored by a Polish team within the framework of an international project devoted to the unearth- ing of the remains of that Graeco-Roman and Byzantine-Umayyad period town, headed by Arthur Segal of the University of Haifa. Despite the fact that as many as four churches have so far been uncovered at Sussita,1 it is only the North-West Church (NWC) that became one of the examples discussed by A. Ovadiah in his paper listing Byzantine-peri- od churches excavated within the borders of the present-day Israel, in which architectural changes apparently refl ect some liturgical modifi cations.2 Unfortunately, A. Ovadiah’s interpretation of the NWC (published in 2005) not only was based on the reports of the early seasons of our fi eldwork (2002, 2003), but also proved to be rather superfi cial one, a fact which calls for a careful re-examination of the excavation data. Perhaps the most important fact about the NWC is that this has been one of rare in- stances attested for the region of a church that was still active as such during the Um- ayyad period. Archaeological contexts sealed by the earthquake of A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of Christianity in the Eastern Black Sea Littoral (Written and Archaeological Sources)*
    9863-07_AncientW&E_09 07-11-2007 16:04 Pagina 177 doi: 10.2143/AWE.6.0.2022799 AWE 6 (2007) 177-219 THE SPREAD OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE EASTERN BLACK SEA LITTORAL (WRITTEN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOURCES)* L.G. KHRUSHKOVA Abstract This article presents a brief summary of the literary and archaeological evidence for the spread and consolidation of Christianity in the eastern Black Sea littoral during the early Christian era (4th-7th centuries AD). Colchis is one of the regions of the late antique world for which the archaeological evidence of Christianisation is greater and more varied than the literary. Developments during the past decade in the field of early Christian archaeology now enable this process to be described in considerably greater detail The eastern Black Sea littoral–ancient Colchis–comprises (from north to south) part of the Sochi district of the Krasnodar region of the Russian Federation as far as the River Psou, then Abkhazia as far as the River Ingur (Engur), and, further south, the western provinces of Georgia: Megrelia (Samegrelo), Guria, Imereti and Adzhara (Fig. 1). This article provides a summary of the literary and archaeological evidence for the spread and consolidation of Christianity in the region during the early Christ- ian era (4th-7th centuries AD).1 Colchis is one of the regions of late antiquity for which the archaeological evidence of Christianisation is greater and more varied than the literary. Progress during the past decade in the field of early Christian archaeology now enables this process to be described in considerably greater detail.2 The many early Christian monuments of Colchis are found in ancient cities and fortresses that are familiar through the written sources.3 These include Pityus (modern Pitsunda, Abkhazian Mzakhara, Georgian Bichvinta); Nitike (modern Gagra); Trakheia, which is surely Anakopiya (modern Novyi Afon, Abkhazian Psyrtskha); Dioscuria/ * Translated from Russian by Brent Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Swinging Thuribles in Early Byzantine Churches in the Holy Land. Author
    Восточнохристианское искусство 119 УДК: 7.033.2…1 ББК: 85.13 А43 DOI:10.18688/aa166-2-12 Fanny Vitto Swinging Thuribles in Early Byzantine Churches in the Holy Land Swinging thuribles producing fragrant smoke are commonplace in the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Armenian, and Roman Catholic Churches. The use of incense, though, predates Christianity by thousands of years. The practice of incense burning during religious ceremonies was customary for most ancient civilizations around the Mediterranean. It orig- inated in the Near East, doubtlessly because its ingredients, frankincense and spices, were indigenous to this area. Frankincense is an aromatic resin obtained from the Boswellia sacra tree which grew mainly in southern Arabia and southern Nubia. Isaiah (Isaiah 60:6) speaks of the caravans of camels from Midian and Sheba carrying gold and frankincense. Incense was a greatly valued commodity in the ancient times. It is quite significant that frankincense (λίβανος) was one of the three gifts the Magi offered to infant Jesus (Matthew 2:11). In antiquity, incense was burned in various vessels including high clay stands, tripods with holes and horned altars. The Old Testament contains numerous references to the use of in- cense in Ancient Israel [9; 15; 23]. There were two terms for incense used in Hebrew: qetoret (a burning mixture of spices) and levonah (meaning white, i.e., frankincense which is one of the ingredients in qetoret). In the Temple of Jerusalem incense was burned by the High Priest in the Holy of Holies. On the Day of Atonement, the smoke of incense (qetoret sammim) sym- bolically carried men’s prayers to God in order to obtain forgiveness for their sins.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the River Wear-Part 1
    Armchair Adventurers Explore The River Wear G eog rap Part 1 from the Pennines to the outskirts of Durham hy A period. On the sea bed a limy ooze full of the rch y aeo eolog log G decaying skeletons of sea creatures built up. y Rivers washed down sand and gravel building His up deltas, and forests flourished on the deltas tory and swampy margins. Periodically the seas rose, drowned the deltas and forests and more Geology ooze was deposited; then sea levels dropped The River Wear rises in the North Pennines and and the deltas and forests returned. This cycle flows in an easterly direction to empty in the with compression gave rise to sedimentary North Sea at Sunderland. Weardale is in an rocks. The oozes became limestone, the sands, gravels and muds became shale and sandstone, and the forests became coal. Limestone and sandstone are resistant to erosion, whereas the softer shales wear away more easily. This contrast has produced the terraced hillsides which are characteristic of the whole area and the hard limestone outcrops form waterfalls created by the erosion. area designated for it’s Outstanding Natural Beauty. It is also a UNESCO Global Geopark. A Geopark is a place of outstanding geological heritage which is used to support sustainable development through conservation, education, interpretation and nature tourism. High Force Waterfall Limestone is the dominant rock in Upper The landscape has evolved over 500 million Weardale. Its main constituent, calcium years. During that time the valley has been carbonate, is soluble in rainwater which is liquid molten rock, desert,tropical sea,swamps, acidic and has eroded it to form sink holes, and an ice sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Yew Tree Cottage Ampney St Mary Gloucestershire
    Yew Tree Cottage Ampney St Mary Gloucestershire, GL7 LifestyleA Cotswold benefit family pull house out in statementa lovely edge can of go village to two orlocation three .lines. 4-5XXX4 3-4 X FirstCirencester paragraph, 4.5 miles, editorial Fairford style, 6 short,miles, consideredKemble station headline (London benefitsPaddington of living 80 minutes) here. One 9 miles,or two Swindon sentences (London that convey Paddington what you55 minutes) would say 16 in miles, person. M4 (J15) 18 miles, Cheltenham 20 miles, M5 (J11A) 20 miles (All distances and times are approximate) Second paragraph, additional details of note about the property. Wording to add value and support image selection. Tem volum is solor si aliquation rempore puditiunto qui utatis adit, animporepro experit et dolupta ssuntio mos apieturere ommosti squiati busdaecus cus dolorporum volutem SubYew HeadTree Cottage Yew Tree Cottage is a detached period property dating we believe from the mid 18th Century and is built of natural Cotswold stone with traditional stone tiles to the main roof slope. It is listed Grade II as being of special architectural and historic interest and has recently been refurbished and extended by the current owners, Subincluding replacingHead all the bathrooms, enlarging and creating a superb new kitchen/breakfast room and fitted an excellent utility area. The accommodation, which is very well presented, extends to just over 3500 square feet and is flexible in its useage. It is currently configured as a 4 bedroom family house but if more bedroom space is required, both the sitting room and gym could potentially be used and in particular the sitting room which has direct access to a ground floor shower room.
    [Show full text]