DOCSLIB.ORG

The Top 10 Management Characteristics of Highly Rated U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Top 10 Management Characteristics of Highly Rated U.S The Top 10 Management Characteristics Of Highly Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers Primary Credit Analyst: John A Sugden, New York (1) 212-438-1678; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Robin L Prunty, New York (1) 212-438-2081; [email protected] Table Of Contents Top 10 List WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 23, 2012 1 1001327 | 300126912 The Top 10 Management Characteristics Of Highly Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers (Editor's Note: This is an updated version of an article published July 26, 2010.) U.S. public finance issuers are a varied group, but the management practices of the strongest borrowers show some distinct commonalities. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has widely disseminated to investors and issuers its approach for assigning credit ratings in U.S. public finance (see "USPF Criteria: State Ratings Methodology," published Jan. 3, 2011; and "USPF Criteria: GO Debt," published Oct. 12, 2006, on RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal). We have also developed representative ranges for key ratios that factor into our analysis of tax-backed credit quality (see "USPF Criteria: Key General Obligation Ratio Credit Ranges – Analysis Vs. Reality," published April 2, 2008). Although these ratios are the foundation of the quantitative measures Standard & Poor's uses when assigning a credit rating, Standard & Poor's also relies on qualitative factors to inform our credit analysis. In 2006, Standard & Poor's released its Financial Management Assessment, which offers a more transparent assessment of a government's financial practices, as an integral part of our credit rating process (see "Financial Management Assessment," published June 27, 2006). Our view of management factors, administrative characteristics, and other structural issues facing a government entity may be an overriding factor in a rating outcome. (Watch the related CreditMatters TV segment titled, "What Do Highly Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers Have In Common?", dated Aug. 14, 2012.) We view management as contributing significantly to many of the individual credit ratios, which can positively affect ratings in a number of ways. On the whole, state and local governments have made many improvements to budget structure, reserve policies, and debt management during prior periods of budget stress. Whether these practices are developed as part of a comprehensive risk management plan or individually, they have, in our view, generally enhanced government's ability to manage through downturns and have contributed to credit stability over time. Conversely, we believe that the lack of strong management can be a significant factor in a weak credit profile. In our opinion, while the economy remains a key factor in assigning a rating level, our view of management and the institutional framework is usually one of the deciding factors in fine-tuning the rating. Overview • Our view of a government entity's management and administrative characteristics, along with other structural issues it faces, can move a rating up or down more significantly and swiftly than any other element of a credit review. • We've observed some distinct commonalities in the management practices of highly rated U.S. public finance issuers over the years. • Proactive budget and liability planning, strong liquidity management, and the establishment of reserves are among the factors the strongest issuers share. When assessing management, Standard & Poor's analyzes the political and fiscal framework that governs it, as well as WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 23, 2012 2 1001327 | 300126912 The Top 10 Management Characteristics Of Highly Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers the day-to-day management procedures and policies. There could be a strong management team in place, but if there is political instability or lack of political will to make difficult decisions, we have found that management could be ineffective in many cases. Standard & Poor's also focuses on the "whole of government." Our view of oversight and management controls covering the disparate operations of a government with a focus on accountability at each department or function is critical to strong credit ratings. The following "Top 10" list of management characteristics associated with Standard & Poor's highly rated issuers is generally applicable to state and local governments as well as to other enterprise operations of government such as water, sewer, or solid waste. The relative importance of these factors may vary from issuer to issuer. Our view of credibility is an important part of a rating review process and management assessment. Every government has challenges, but we believe that identifying problems or issues and detailing how these will be addressed establish credibility and greater transparency in the rating process. Top 10 List 1. Focus on structural balance In our view, a structurally balanced budget is an essential characteristic of highly rated credits. There are many views of what constitutes a balanced budget. For some governments, a budget is balanced if current revenues plus available reserves match or exceed current expenditures. From Standard & Poor's standpoint, a budget is balanced if recurring revenues match recurring expenditures. In evaluating whether or not a budget is balanced, we analyze the underlying revenue and expenditure assumptions. We might not have a positive view of a budget that relies on optimistic revenue assumptions relative to the current economic environment to meet recurring expenditures. We consider recurring expenditures all of those that are typically incurred year after year and are required as part of a government's normal ongoing operations. This includes salaries, debt service, and pension payments among others. Consistent with our analysis of revenues, expenditure assumptions that rely on debt restructuring for budgetary savings, deferral of ongoing expenditures, and saving assumptions that have significant implementation risks could also color our view of whether a budget is balanced or not. A government's ability to maintain or quickly return to structural balance during a period of economic weakness can lead us to affirm or raise an issuer credit rating. The opposite is also true. Reliance primarily on one-time measures without the appropriate re-alignment of revenues and expenditures could cause us to lower the ratings. 2. Strong liquidity management An additional credit quality factor is management's ability to manage its cash flow and identify potential issues, internal or external, that could lead to a liquidity crunch. Potential for inadequate liquidity serves as a bellwether to the risk of immediate and potentially severe credit deterioration, particularly for those with significant budget misalignments and issuers of certain types of variable-rate debt, in our view. Ultimately, the possibility of having insufficient money to meet debt obligations is at the heart of our credit analysis. In the few instances where state or local governments may encounter genuine credit distress, it is likely accompanied and possibly exacerbated by problems with liquidity. Access to additional sources of internal or external liquidity and a plan on how, when, and in what amounts to access these, are a credit positive. However, just having access to additional liquidity, either through WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 23, 2012 3 1001327 | 300126912 The Top 10 Management Characteristics Of Highly Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers pooled cash or loans from other funds, is not enough. The absence of clear accountability as to where the cash is coming from or when it will be paid back could create uncertainty about the sustainability of the cash flow and the potential implications of reallocating the cash from one use to the other. In addition, some obligors' debt profiles include liquidity risk exposure tied to variable-rate demand obligations, alternative financing products, and other debt instruments. Under some of these structures, the potential for accelerated repayment causing sudden and significant demands on an issuer's liquidity could have credit implications (see "The Appeal Of Alternative Financing Is Not Without Risk For Municipal Issuers," May 17, 2011). We have found that management teams of highly rated credits are able to limit, mitigate, or develop a careful plan to manage the potential exposure to these liquidity demands. 3. Regular economic and revenue updates to identify shortfalls early In our experience, having a formal mechanism to monitor economic trends and revenue performance at regular intervals is a key feature of stable financial performance. This is particularly true in the case of states, which we have observed tend to exhibit revenue declines during economic downturns because they rely on personal income tax, sales tax, corporate income tax, and other economically sensitive sources. We believe that evaluating historical performance of certain revenues is important to this analysis because each government will have different leading or lagging economic indicators that signal potential revenue variance issues based on its economic structure. The earlier revenue weakness is identified in the fiscal year, the more effective, in our view, the budget balancing response can be. We think it is important to monitor upside growth as well. In our opinion, it is also important to understand a surge in revenues to determine if the trend is an aberration or something that is likely to sustain. 4. An established
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finance Without Financiers*
    3 Finance without Financiers* Robert C. Hockett, Cornell Law School * Thanks to Dan Alpert, Fadhel Kaboub, Stephanie Kelton, Paul McCulley, Zoltan Polszar, Nouriel Roubini and particularly my alter ego Saule Omarova. Special thanks to Fred Block and Erik Olin Wright, who have been part of this project since its inception in 2014 – as well as to the “September Group,” where it proved necessary that same year to formulate arguments whose full elaboration has issued in this Chapter. Hockett, Finance without Financiers 4 I see, therefore, the rentier aspect of capitalism as a transitional phase which will disappear when it has done its work…Thus [we] might aim in practice… at an increase in the volume of capital until it ceases to be scarce, so that the functionless investor will no longer receive a bonus; and at a scheme of direct taxation which allows the intelligence and determination and executive skill of the financiers… (who are certainly so fond of their craft that their labour could be obtained much cheaper than at present), to be harnessed to the service of the community on reasonable terms of reward.1 INTRODUCTION: MYTHS OF SCARCITY AND INTERMEDIATION A familiar belief about banks and other financial institutions is that they function primarily as “intermediaries,” managing flows of scarce funds from private sector “savers” or “surplus units” who have accumulated them to “dissevers” or “deficit units” who have need of them and can pay for their use. This view is routinely stated in treatises,2 textbooks,3 learned journals,4 and the popular media.5 It also lurks in the background each time we hear theoretical references to “loanable funds,” practical warnings about public “crowd-out” of private investment, or the like.6 This, what I shall call “intermediated scarce private capital” view of finance bears two interesting properties.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Activity in U.S. Public Finance
    COVID-19COVID-19 ActivityActivity InIn U.S.U.S. PublicPublic FinanceFinance JulyJuly 22,22, 20212021 Rating Activity PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST On Sept. 22, 2020, we changed the presentation of rating changes in the summary table below. For Robin L Prunty issuers that have had multiple rating actions since March 24, 2020, the table now shows the most New York recent rating action rather than the first. Each issuer will only be included in the summary table + 1 (212) 438 2081 once. robin.prunty @spglobal.com SECONDARY CONTACT Summary Of Rating Actions Eden P Perry Through July 21, 2021 New York (1) 212-438-0613 On Sept. 22, 2020, we changed the presentation of rating changes in the summary table below. For issuers that have had multiple rating eden.perry actions since March 24, 2020, the table now shows the most recent rating action rather than the first. Each issuer will only be included in @spglobal.com the summary table once. Charter Schs, Independent Schs, Health Higher Ed & Community Local Action Care Housing Not-For-Profit Colls Govts States Transportation Utilities Total Downgrade 9 12 28 3 39 2 6 4 103 Downgrade + 1 2 1 4 CreditWatch negative Downgrade + 4 1 10 2 24 2 5 48 Negative outlook revision Downgrade + 3 2 5 Off CreditWatch Downgrade + 10 1 16 3 36 1 1 68 Stable outlook revision Negative 39 13 169 20 525 14 44 28 852 outlook revision Stable 21 1 71 1 330 11 142 5 582 outlook revision www.spglobal.com/ratings July 22, 2021 1 COVID-19 Activity In U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Public Financial Management Reform
    Commonwealth Secretariat Published by: Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Copyright @ Commonwealth Secretariat All Rights Reserved. No part of this public publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher. May be purchased from Publication Unit Commonwealth Secretariat Telephone: +44(0)20 7747 6342 Facsimile: +44(0)20 7839 9081 GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORM Commonwealth Secretariat TABLE OF CONTENTS Reform 26 Appendix C List of Participants of the Brainstorming Workshop 34 FOREWORD v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROCESS FRAMEWORK (“HOW”) 3 2.1. Develop a strategic reform framework 3 2.2. Address structural issues 4 2.3. Make a commitment to change (political will) 5 2.4. Establish and empower key institutions 7 2.5. Managing reform 7 2.6. Monitor progress of PFM reforms 10 3. FISCAL FRAMEWORK (“WHAT”) 12 3.1. Revenue collection 12 3.2. Improve debt management 13 3.3. Improve planning processes 14 3.4. Improve budgeting 14 3.5. Strong budget implementation, accounting and reporting 15 3.6. Procurement 16 3.7. Strong internal and external oversight 17 4. Conclusion 22 References 23 Appendix A: Excerpts from the Abuja Communique 2003 24 iv Appendix B: Supporting Better Country Public Financial Management Systems: Towards a Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFR FOREWORD ABBREVIATIONS ANAO Australia National Audit Office Implementing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) demands effective public ANC African National Congress financial management that is imbued with transparency and accountability measures to CFAA Country Financial Accountability Assessment achieve strategic outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Finance Authority
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 31, 2018 NEW ISSUE RATING: Fitch: BB BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continuing compliance by the Authority and the Corporation with their respective covenants to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as described herein, interest on the Bonds will not be includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for purposes of federal income taxation. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the Bonds will not be a specific preference item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax imposed by the Code. Interest on the Bonds will not be exempt from State of Wisconsin or State of North Carolina income taxes. See “TAX TREATMENT.” $91,460,000* PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY RETIREMENT FACILITIES FIRST MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS (SOUTHMINSTER) SERIES 2018 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside front cover The Bonds offered hereby (the “Bonds”) are being issued by the Public Finance Authority (the “Authority”) pursuant to a Trust Agreement between the Authority and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Bond Trustee”), for the purpose of providing funds to Southminster, Inc. (the “Corporation”), to be used, together with other available funds, to (i) pay the costs of the Project (as defined herein), (ii) fund Reserve Fund No. 1 (as defined herein) and (iii) pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. See “THE PROJECT” in Appendix A hereto and “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS” herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Money for the Public Good
    ICAEW BETTER GOVERNMENT SERIES Public money for the public good BUILDING TRUST IN THE PUBLIC FINANCES A POLICY INSIGHT PUBLIC MONEY FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD PUBLIC MONEY FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD PageForeword head ‘Public money ought to be For the government this bond of trust is INSIGHT especially important. The public needs to With the public touched with the most trust that when the government asks them for sector making scrupulous conscientiousness taxes, the monies paid over and other public up nearly half resources will be used for the public good. of the global of honour. It is not the economy, effective public financial produce of riches only, but Every country has a unique history and faces management is a of the hard earnings of distinct challenges. While there can never critical factor in the be a single approach to public financial economic success labour and poverty.’ management, there are certain universal of each and principles and factors which underpin the every country. Thomas Paine creation of trust anywhere in the world. This publication provides an overview of those Successful economies deliver sustainable factors, both cultural and technical. growth and resources to meet the needs of individuals, communities and business. With To illustrate what can be done, we have government activities accounting for nearly half included a range of case studies showing of the global economy, effective public financial how different countries have taken practical management is a crucial, yet all too often steps to build trust in public money. The overlooked, condition for prosperity. majority of these are from developing nations: lower GDP is no barrier to effective public The role of professional accountants is financial management.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Finance Overview
    Jim Young, Esq. and Warren Greenlee, Esq. Young Law Group, PLLC 601.354.3660 [email protected] [email protected] Debt must comply with statutes • Purpose for borrowing • Process of borrowing • Structure of debt • Investment of proceeds Failure to comply can lead to jail and fines Public Finance is highly regulated State and local issues Federal tax • Amount of issue • Timing of issue • Use of proceeds • Use of project • Arbitrage rebate Federal securities law • Initial offering disclosure • Continuing disclosure • General anti-fraud provisions • Method of sale/Necessary parties These days you have to create your own breaks • Strategic planning • Millage management • Efficiencies and savings • Refundings • Cooperative endeavors • Operational savings It is not rocket science One size does not fit all Options for structure Options for method of sale MAS Small Loan Program Options for issuer vs. conduit Options for finance team Parties Involved in Financing Bond Counsel (hired by county to give legal opinion) County has met all legal & procedural requirements Interest on debt is exempt Generally prepares authorizing resolutions & closing documents Issuer’s Counsel (county attorney) Gives legal opinion that the authorizing resolutions & closing documents were validly approved by county Assists bond counsel with local matters Financial Advisor (Municipal Advisor) – assists county on financial matters in connection with issuing debt Method of sale (competitive bid, negotiated, underwritten, private placement, direct bank loan) Sizing & structuring
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilisation Policy in New Zealand: Counting Your Blessings, One by One† Willem H
    Stabilisation policy in New Zealand: Counting your blessings, one by one† Willem H. Buiter, Professor of European Political Economy, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science†† 1 Introduction Responsibility Act 1994 (FRA). Together they provide a This paper is written in response to an invitation from the framework which, if adhered to consistently, now and in Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) and the New Zealand the future, will ensure fiscal sustainability. Treasury, to take part in a “project to investigate policy When in 1982, during a spell as a visitor in the Fiscal Affairs options for a smoother evolution of the New Zealand Department of the IMF, I wrote a paper (Buiter (1983), see business cycle, particularly in respect to swings in the also Buiter (1985) and Gray, Merton and Bodie (2003)) exchange-rate and shifting pressures on the externally advocating the collection of data that would permit the exposed sectors of the economy.” My contribution consists construction of a comprehensive, ‘marked to market’ of a paper that focuses on the role of fiscal policy, but is also balance sheet for the consolidated public sector (general expected to consider the overall macro-mix of monetary, government, central bank and all other agencies for which fiscal, external and structural policies. the general government is ultimately financially responsible), New Zealand has pioneered more important changes in the including a full accounting for deferred contingent liabilities design of monetary and fiscal policy and in the institutional and for the uncertain future cash flows associated with arrangements through which monetary and fiscal policy state assets, I did not anticipate that any country would are designed and implemented, than any country since ever contemplate actually implementing anything remotely (at least) the second half of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Finance Authority
    Supplement dated November 14, 2017 to Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum dated October 26, 2017 $14,660,000* $670,000* PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY EDUCATION REVENUE BONDS TAXABLE EDUCATION REVENUE BONDS (UWHARRIE CHARTER ACADEMY PROJECT) (UWHARRIE CHARTER ACADEMY PROJECT) SERIES 2017A SERIES 2017B This Supplement dated November 14, 2017 to Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum dated October 26, 2017 (this "Supplement") supplements the Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum dated October 26, 2017 (the "Original PLOM") relating to the captioned bonds to reflect: • modifications to the Indenture and Loan Agreement that: create a repair and replacement fund in the Indenture and require the Borrower to fund such repair and replacement fund monthly based on a capital needs assessment to be conducted once every five years commencing no later than June 30, 2022; modify the additional Indebtedness incurrence tests applicable to the Borrower for the incurrence of Long-Term Parity Indebtedness, Short-Term Indebtedness, Non-Recourse Indebtedness, and Subordinated Indebtedness; permit the Trustee or the Beneficial Owners of not less than a majority of the Bonds then Outstanding to reject an Independent Consultant selected by the Borrower in certain circumstances as described below; and require monthly reporting on construction progress in connection with the Construction Project; • updated and additional information regarding the Charter Modification, the application for which was submitted on November 6, 2017, and on which the Borrower has been informed that the Charter School Advisory Board will make its recommendation in December 2017 and the State Board of Education will render its decision thereon in January 2018, • newly available 2017 SAT composite data by school district, for public school students in the State of North Carolina, and for public school students in the United States, and • an updated anticipated date of issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds of November 22, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Monetary Policy in the Information Economy
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MONETARY POLICY IN THE INFORMATION ECONOMY Michael Woodford Working Paper 8674 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8674 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2001 Prepared for the “Symposium on Economic Policy for the Information Economy,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 30-September 1, 2001. I am especially grateful to Andy Brookes (RBNZ), Chuck Freedman (Bank of Canada), and Chris Ryan (RBA) for their unstinting efforts to educate me about the implementation of monetary policy at their respective central banks. Of course, none of them should be held responsible for the interpretations offered here. I would also like to thank David Archer, Alan Blinder, Kevin Clinton, Ben Friedman, David Gruen, Bob Hall, Spence Hilton, Mervyn King, Ken Kuttner, Larry Meyer, Hermann Remsperger, Lars Svensson, Bruce White and Julian Wright for helpful discussions, Gauti Eggertsson and Hong Li for research assistance, and the National Science Foundation for research support through a grant to the National Bureau of Economic Research. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2001 by Michael Woodford. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Monetary Policy in the Information Economy Michael Woodford NBER Working Paper No. 8674 December 2001 JEL No. E58 ABSTRACT This paper considers two challenges that improvements in private-sector information-processing capabilities may pose for the effectiveness of monetary policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of KYC Chapter
    Undue Diligence How banks do business with corrupt regimes CONTENTS Summary 1. Introduction: breaking the links between banks, corruption and poverty 2. Who is your customer? 3. Riggs and Equatorial Guinea: doing business with heads of state (Plus: Where did Equatorial Guinea’s oil money go after the demise of Riggs?) 4. Barclays and Equatorial Guinea: doing business with the sons of heads of state, Part I (Plus: Who banks for President Bongo of Gabon since Citibank closed its doors to him?) 5. Bank of East Asia and Republic of Congo: doing business with the sons of heads of state, Part II 6. Citibank, Fortis and Liberia’s logs of war: doing business with natural resources that are fuelling conflict 7. Deutsche Bank and Turkmenistan: doing business with a human rights abuser 8. Oil-backed loans to Angola: doing business with an opaque national oil company 9. The problem with the Financial Action Task Force 10. Conclusions and recommendations Glossary Summary What is the problem? The world has learnt during 2008 and 2009 that failures by banks and the governments that regulate them have been responsible for pitching the global economy into its worst crisis in decades. People in the world’s richest countries are rightly angry at the increasing job losses and house repossessions. What is less understood is that for much longer, failures by banks and the governments that regulate them have caused untold damage to the economies of some of the poorest countries in the world. By doing business with dubious customers in corrupt, natural resource-rich states, banks are facilitating corruption and state looting, which deny these countries the chance to lift themselves out of poverty and leave them dependent on aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy with 100 Percent Reserve Banking: an Exploration
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MONETARY POLICY WITH 100 PERCENT RESERVE BANKING: AN EXPLORATION Edward C. Prescott Ryan Wessel Working Paper 22431 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22431 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2016 The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Edward C. Prescott and Ryan Wessel. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Monetary Policy with 100 Percent Reserve Banking: An Exploration Edward C. Prescott and Ryan Wessel NBER Working Paper No. 22431 July 2016 JEL No. E4,E5,E6 ABSTRACT We explore monetary policy in a world without fractional reserve banking. In our world, banks are purely transaction institutions. Money is a form of government debt that bears interest, which can be negative as well as positive. Services of money are a factor of production. We show that the national accounts must be revised in this world. Using our baseline economy, we determine a balanced growth path for a set of money interest rate policy regimes. Besides this interest rate, the only policy variable that differs across regimes is the labor income tax rate. Within this set of policy regimes, there is a balanced growth welfare-maximizing regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Public Financial Management Reform Reform Management Financial Public of Evaluation 2012:7 Joint Evaluation Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi 2001–2010
    Evaluation of Public Financial Management Reform Evaluation of Public Financial Management Reform 2012:7 Joint Evaluation Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi 2001–2010 Where and why do Public Financial Management (PFM) reforms succeed? Where and how does donor support to PFM reform contribute most effectively to results? This report summarises the findings and conclusions of Andrew Lawson an evaluation based on studies of the PFM reforms in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi. The evaluation also draws on a global quantitative review. It is found that results tend to be good when there is a strong commitment at both political and technical levels, when reform designs and implementation models are well tailored to the context and when strong, government-led coordination arrangements are in place to monitor and guide reforms. Donor funding for PFM reform has been effective in countries where the context and mechanisms were right for success, and where external funding was focused on the Government’s own reform programme. Evaluation of Public The willingness of some Governments to fund PFM reforms directly shows that external funding may not be the deciding factor, however. Donor pressure to develop comprehensive PFM reform plans and monitoring frameworks can be a positive influence but attempts to overtly influence either the pace or the content of PFM Financial Management Reform reforms were found to be ineffective and often counter-productive. Key lessons for donor agencies are thus to focus on countries where the right preconditions exist, to align to government programmes and, under all circumstances, to ensure that aid works in favour of the PFM system and not against it.
    [Show full text]