T TA /Î-T Dissertation Ij L Y L I Information Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T TA /Î-T Dissertation Ij L Y L I Information Service INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advstnced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarify on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. T TA /Î-T Dissertation i J l Y l i Information Service University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 N. Z eeb Road, Ann Arbor, Micfiigan 48106 8618856 Stribling, James Bentley WORLD GENERIC REViSION OF PTILODACTYLIDAE (COLEOPTERA;DRYOPOIDEA) The Ohio State University Ph.D. 1986 University Microfilms I nternsti 0 nâl SOO N. zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 WORLD GENERIC REVISION OF PTILODACTYLIDAE (COLEOPTERA: DRYOPOIDEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By James B. Stribling, B.S., M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 1986 Dissertation Committee: Approved by C. A. Triplehorn N. F. Johnson Û- Adviser D. E. Johnston Department of Entomology B. D. Valentine Copyright by James Bentley Stribling 1986 To My Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people to whom I am very grateful for academic, moral, physical, and financial support during my graduate career at The Ohio State University: my adviser. Dr. Charles A. Triplehorn, for sound advice for the duration and understanding when I needed it most; Dr. Norman F. Johnson for numerous discussions, suggestions, and welcome advice on systematic theory and taxonomic procedure; my officemates, colleagues, and fellow graduate students, especially, Paul S. Cwikla, Michael A. Ivie, Richard S. Miller, and John A. Shuey, for seemingly unending discussions on systematics, for companionship on collecting trips, and for tolerance during these last few months; John F. Lawrence for much advice and comment on this as well as smaller simultaneous projects; W. Calvin Welbourn for many hours spent in setting up the AT&T 3B2 and QTREE and then tutoring me on their use; John F. Lawrence, Charles W. O'Brien, and Arthur J. Gilbert for gifts of specimens; Roland L= Seymour (Department of Botany, The Ohio State University) for fungal identifica­ iii tions; Ho-Yih Liu (also Department of Botany, 0. S. 0.) for translating some of Nakane's works from Japanese; all of the curators in the "Materials" section for giving me the opportunity to study their specimens (even past expiration dates on loan forms); Niki Lowell and Adam Rubinstein for the habitus illustrations (Figures 3 (N. L«) and 1 and 2 (A. R.); and Helen W. Monk for typing part of the manuscript. Partial funding of museum trips was provided by Sigma Xi (Grant-in-Aid of Research), The Ohio State University Graduate School (Graduate Student Alumni Research Award), and the Knull Fund, Department of Entomology. I am very grateful to them. I owe immense thanks to my wonderful parents. Dr. and Mrs. Loutrelle, for their financial support, endless moral support, encouragement, and for all of those times I needed "a good talkin' to" and got it. Finally, I thank my wife, Sally, for the hours of assistance she has given me in my research, taking time out of her own to process specimens, to type, or to take over household duties when I might be nearing a deadline. My greatest thanks to her are for her unwavering love, encouragement, and companionship. IV VITA October 13, 1958.............. Born - Jackson, Mississippi 1980.................. .. .B. S., The University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi 1982 # ••••«•••••• # #M# S #, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1980-present..................Graduate Research/Teaching Associate, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University PRESENTATIONS 1985. Phylogenetic Implications of Metathoracic Wing Venation in Dryopoidea (Coleoptera). Annual Meeting of Entomological Society of America, Hollywood, Florida. The Biology and Systematics of Anchvtarsus (Coleoptera: Ptilodactylidae). Annual Meeting of the North Central Branch, Entomological Society of America, Lexington, Kentucky. The Biology, Phylogeny, and Zoogeography of the Wing-Toe Beetles (Ptilodactylidae). Departmental seminar. Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus. 1984. The Faces of Systematic Biology. Invited seminar. Department of Biology, The University of Mississippi, Oxford. 1981. The New World Genera of the Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera). Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, San Diego, California. PUBLICATIONS 1986. Revision of Anchvtarsus (Coleoptera: Dryopoidea) and a key to the New World genera of Ptilodactylidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 79: 219-234. 1984. Taxonomic and nomenclatorial notes on Caribbean Tropicus Pacheco (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 86 (4): 946-950. (with M. A. Ivie) Report on the LeConte symposium on the classification and phylogeny of the Coleoptera, Detroit and Columbus, 1983. Coleop. Bull. 38 (1): 98-102. (with M. A. Ivie) FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Systematic Entomology with specialization in Coleoptera biosystematics. VI TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................... iii VITA........................................ V LIST OF TABLES......................... ix LIST OF FIGURES............................ x CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION...................................1 II. METHODS AND MATERIALS .........................4 Methods Phylogenetic...................... 4 General........................... 8 Material............................... 11 III. NATURAL HISTORY..............................16 IV. CHARACTERS, POLARIZATION, PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS, AND CLASSIFICATION........... 19 Monophyly of the Ptilodactylidae. 19 Character discussion................... 19 H e a d ................... 20 Thorax........................... 23 Abdomen........................... 28 Character polarization................. 29 Discussion of phylogenetic analysis and resulting classification ..... 32 V. TAXONOMY......................................38 Key to World Genera of Ptilodactylidae (Adults)......................... 38 The World Genera of Ptilodactylidae Anchvtarsus Guerin-Meneville . 42 vii Cladotoma Westwood .............. 44 Paraiichas White ................ 47 Hovactvla Fairmaire. ....... 50 Pseudocladotoma Pic. ....... 52 Octoqlossa Guérin-Méneville. 54 Bradvtoma Guérin-Méneville .... 57 Aploqlossa Guérin-Méneville. 60 Anchycteis Horn................... 63 Epilichas White................... 66 Bvrrocrvptus Broun .............. 69 Araeopidius Cockerell............. 72 Stenafricus NEW GENUS............. 74 Daemon de Laporte........ .. 77 Falsotherius P i c ............... 8 1 Pseudoepilichas Armstrong and Nakane ................................. 83 Ectvphodactvla NEW GENUS ..... 85 Ptiloderes NEW G E N U S ............. 89 Pherocladus Fairmaire. ...... 91 Lachnodactvla Champion .......... 94 Ptilodactvla Illiger . ......... 97 Stirophora Champion.............. 118 Chelonariomorphus Pic............ 121 Epiptyqma NEW GENUS. ........ 123 Therius Guerin-Mènev i l i e ........ 126 Incertae sedis....................... 129 Exclusions. .................. 129 LITERATURE CITED.................................. 130 APPEmiX A. Figures ................................. 144 Vlll LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Fungal spores and hyphae identified from gut content of some species of Ptilodactlidae. 18 2. Hypothesized polarities of characters used in phylogenetic analysis of the genera of Ptilodactylidae............ 35 3. Phylogenetic hypothesis resulting from QTREE analysis of characters in Table 2. Reversals are indicated by dots at the upper right hand side of the character numbers; characters with multiple apomorphic appearances are 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, and 3 8 ................................... 36 4» Proposed supraspecific classification of the Ptilodactylidae based on phyletic sequencing • 37 ix LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES PAGE 1. Dorsal habitus. Anchvcteis velutina, male............... 146 2. Dorsal habitus, Ptilodactvla militaris, male. ............................... 148 3. Dorsal habitus. Ptiloderes sp., female. » . 150 4. Serrate antenna; Bradvtoma lineata........... 152 5. Ramous antenna, nonarticulated rami; Paralichas q u e r i n i .......... 152 6. Ramous
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) Based on Larval, Pupal and Adult Characters
    Systematic Entomology (2007), 32, 502–538 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00374.x Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) based on larval, pupal and adult characters CHI-FENG LEE1 , MASATAKA SATOˆ2 , WILLIAM D. SHEPARD3 and M A N F R E D A . J A¨CH4 1Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, 2Dia Cuore 306, Kamegahora 3-1404, Midoriku, Nagoya, 458-0804, Japan, 3Essig Museum of Entomology, 201 Wellman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A., and 4Natural History Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria Abstract. We conducted the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Pse- phenidae, based on 143 morphological characters of adults, larvae and pupae and coded for 34 taxa, representing three outgroups and 31 psephenid genera, including four undescribed ones. A strict consensus tree calculated (439 steps, consistency index ¼ 0.45, retention index ¼ 0.75) from the two most-parsimonious cladograms indicated that the monophyly of the family and subfamilies is supported, with the exception of Eubriinae, which is paraphyletic when including Afroeubria. Here a new subfamily, Afroeubriinae (subfam.n.), is formally estab- lished for Afroeubria. The analysis also indicated that the ‘streamlined’ larva is a derived adaptive radiation. Here, suprageneric taxonomy and the evolution of some significant characters are discussed. Keys are provided to the subfamilies and genera of Psephenidae considering larvae, adults and pupae. Introduction type specimens and the association of adults and immature stages by rearing, five new genera were proposed for Ori- Psephenidae, the ‘water penny’ beetles, are characterized by ental taxa and a well-resolved phylogenetic tree was ob- the peculiar larval body shape (Figs 4–7).
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Bremsen Als Parasiten Und Vektoren
    DIPLOMARBEIT / DIPLOMA THESIS Titel der Diplomarbeit / Title of the Diploma Thesis „Blutsaugende Bremsen in Österreich und ihre medizini- sche Relevanz“ verfasst von / submitted by Manuel Vogler angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2019 / Vienna, 2019 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 190 445 423 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Lehramtsstudium UF Biologie und Umweltkunde degree programme as it appears on UF Chemie the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Andreas Hassl Danksagung Hiermit möchte ich mich sehr herzlich bei Herrn ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Andreas Hassl für die Vergabe und Betreuung dieser Diplomarbeit bedanken. Seine Unterstützung und zahlreichen konstruktiven Anmerkungen waren mir eine ausgesprochen große Hilfe. Weiters bedanke ich mich bei meiner Mutter Karin Bock, die sich stets verständnisvoll ge- zeigt und mich mein ganzes Leben lang bei all meinen Vorhaben mit allen ihr zur Verfügung stehenden Kräften und Mitteln unterstützt hat. Ebenso bedanke ich mich bei meiner Freundin Larissa Sornig für ihre engelsgleiche Geduld, die während meiner zahlreichen Bremsenjagden nicht selten auf die Probe gestellt und selbst dann nicht überstrapaziert wurde, als sie sich während eines Ausflugs ins Wenger Moor als ausgezeichneter Bremsenmagnet erwies. Auch meiner restlichen Familie gilt mein Dank für ihre fortwährende Unterstützung.
    [Show full text]
  • The Variegated Mud-Loving Beetles (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) Of
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 12-1-2012 The variegated mud-loving beetles (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) of Mississippi and Alabama, with discussion and keys to the species occurring in the southeastern United States Jonas G. King Vanderbilt University, [email protected] Paul K. Lago University of Mississippi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi King, Jonas G. and Lago, Paul K., "The av riegated mud-loving beetles (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) of Mississippi and Alabama, with discussion and keys to the species occurring in the southeastern United States" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 788. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/788 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0275 The variegated mud-loving beetles (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) of Mississippi and Alabama, with discussion and keys to the species occurring in the southeastern United States Jonas G. King Department of Biological Sciences Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, 37235 USA Paul K. Lago Department of Biology University of Mississippi University of Mississippi, MS, 38677 USA Date of Issue: December 28, 2012 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Jonas G. King and Paul K. Lago The variegated mud-loving beetles (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) of Mississippi and Alabama, with discussion and keys to the species occurring in the southeastern United States Insecta Mundi 0275: 1- 53 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC2597CC-301F-4E91-9711-5C17399C9AA2 Published in 2012 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Aquatic Insects, Or How Valuable Are Bugs? Richard W
    Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 3 The Endangered Species: A Symposium Article 8 12-1-1979 Rare aquatic insects, or how valuable are bugs? Richard W. Baumann Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Recommended Citation Baumann, Richard W. (1979) "Rare aquatic insects, or how valuable are bugs?," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol3/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. RARE AQUATIC INSECTS, OR HOW VALUABLE ARE BUGS? Richard W. Bauinann' Abstract.— Insects are an important element in the analysis of aquatic ecosystems, (1) because the limited dis- persal abilities of many aquatic species means that they must make a living under existing conditions, and (2) be- cause they are often sensitive to slight changes in water and stream quality, thus making excellent indicators of the physical and chemical conditions in a system. Examples of rare, ecologically sensitive species are presented from the Plecoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Trichoptera. Detailed studies of rare aquatic insect species should produce impor- tant information on critical habitats that will be useful in the protection of endangered and threatened species in other groups of animals and plants. I use the term rare instead of endangered the distribution patterns of certain species fit or threatened, because no aquatic insects are nicely with a model of island biogeography.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • MAINE STREAM EXPLORERS Photo: Theb’S/FLCKR Photo
    MAINE STREAM EXPLORERS Photo: TheB’s/FLCKR Photo: A treasure hunt to find healthy streams in Maine Authors Tom Danielson, Ph.D. ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Kaila Danielson ‐ Kents Hill High School Katie Goodwin ‐ AmeriCorps Environmental Steward serving with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Stream Explorers Coordinators Sally Stockwell ‐ Maine Audubon Hannah Young ‐ Maine Audubon Sarah Haggerty ‐ Maine Audubon Stream Explorers Partners Alanna Doughty ‐ Lakes Environmental Association Brie Holme ‐ Portland Water District Carina Brown ‐ Portland Water District Kristin Feindel ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Maggie Welch ‐ Lakes Environmental Association Tom Danielson, Ph.D. ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Image Credits This guide would not have been possible with the extremely talented naturalists that made these amazing photographs. These images were either open for non‐commercial use and/or were used by permission of the photographers. Please do not use these images for other purposes without contacting the photographers. Most images were edited by Kaila Danielson. Most images of macroinvertebrates were provided by Macroinvertebrates.org, with exception of the following images: Biodiversity Institute of Ontario ‐ Amphipod Brandon Woo (bugguide.net) – adult Alderfly (Sialis), adult water penny (Psephenus herricki) and adult water snipe fly (Atherix) Don Chandler (buigguide.net) ‐ Anax junius naiad Fresh Water Gastropods of North America – Amnicola and Ferrissia rivularis
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat, Life History, and Behavioral Adaptations of Aquatic Insects N
    Habitat, Life History, and Behavioral Adaptations of Aquatic Insects N. H. Anderson J. Bruce Wallace, Oregon State University, Corvallis University of Georgia, Athens INTRODUCTION ADAPTATION TO HABITAT The observed patterns of distribution and abundance of aquatic insects indicate successful adaptations to a wide va- Osmoregulation riety of habitats. To demonstrate how organisms adapt to Aquatic insects need to maintain a proper internal salt particular niches of the freshwater community, examples of and water balance. Body fluids usually contain a much higher species using certain environments are presented in this salt concentration than does the surrounding water and water chapter and the life cycle is used as a framework for describ- tends to pass into the hypertonic (higher osmotic pressure) ing diverse modes of coping with environmental character- hemolymph. The insect integument, especially the wax layer istics. of the epicuticle, appears to be especially important in pre- Factors that influence utilization of a particular habitat venting flooding of the tissues (Chapman 1982). Some fresh- can be grouped into four broad categories: (I) physiological water insects take in large quantities of water during feeding. constraints (e.g., oxygen acquisition, temperature effects, os- Their feces contain more water than the fra ys of terrestrial moregulation; (2) trophic considerations (e.g., food acquisi- counterparts since many aquatic insects excrete nitrogenous tion); (3) physical constraints (e.g., coping with habitat); and wastes as ammonia, which is generally toxic unless diluted (4) biotic interactions (e.g., predation, competition). How- with large quantities of water (Chapman 1982). The pro- ever, these categories are so interrelated that detailed anal- duction of a hypotonic urine (lower osmotic pressure, or more ysis of each factor is not appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies
    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Patrick Center for Environmental Research 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Report No. 10-04F Submitted to: Eastman Chemical Company Tennessee Operations Submitted by: Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 April 20, 2012 Executive Summary he 2010 study was the seventh in a series of comprehensive studies of aquatic biota and Twater chemistry conducted by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in the vicinity of Kingsport, TN. Previous studies were conducted in 1965, 1967 (cursory study, primarily focusing on al- gae), 1974, 1977, 1980, 1990 and 1997. Elements of the 2010 study included analysis of land cover, basic environmental water chemistry, attached algae and aquatic macrophytes, aquatic insects, non-insect macroinvertebrates, and fish. For each study element, field samples were collected and analyzed from Scientists from the Academy's Patrick Center for Environmental Research zones located on the South Fork Holston River have conducted seven major environmental monitoring studies on the (Zones 2, 3 and 5), Big Sluice (Zone 4), mainstem South Fork Holston River since 1965. Holston River (Zone 6), and Horse Creek (Zones HC1and HC2), the approximate locations of which are shown below. The design of the 2010 study was very similar to that of previous surveys, allowing comparisons among surveys. In addition, two areas of potential local impacts were assessed for the first time: Big Tree Spring (BTS, located on the South Fork within Zone 2) and Kit Bottom (KU and KL in the Big Sluice, upstream of Zone 4).
    [Show full text]
  • In Mid-Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar (Burma)
    A new genus of Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma) Stylianos CHATZIMANOLIS Molly E. CASHION Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Ave. Dept 2653, Chattanooga, TN 37403 (USA) [email protected] [email protected] Michael S. ENGEL Zachary H. FALIN Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 (USA) [email protected] [email protected] Chatzimanolis S., Cashion M. E., Engel M. S. & Falin Z. H. 2012. — A new genus of Ptilo- dactylidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma). Geo- diversitas 34 (3): 569-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2012n3a6 ABSTRACT KEY WORDS The first Mesozoic fossil of the beetle family Ptilodactylidae Laporte, 1836 (Byr- Polyphaga, rhoidea) is formally described and figured from a male preserved in latest Albian Elateriformia, Albian, amber from Myanmar. Aphebodactyla rhetine n. gen., n. sp., is distinguished Mesozoic, from its modern relatives and is only the second fossil species yet formally Burma, described in the family. The fossil intermingles putatively derived features of taxonomy, new genus, various ptilodactylid subfamilies, suggesting that the current circumscription new species. of these lineages is in dire need of revision. RÉSUMÉ Nouveau genre de Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) de l’ambre albien ter- minal du Myanmar (Birmanie). MOTS CLÉS Le premier fossile mésozoïque de la famille Ptilodactylidae Laporte, 1836 Polyphaga, (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) est formellement décrit et illustré à partir d’un mâle Elateriformia, Albien, de l’ambre albien terminal du Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Dascillidae)
    Zootaxa 3613 (3): 245–256 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3613.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E34220A4-1B4E-45E1-9FF7-D97801161046 A revision of the genus Notodascillus Carter (Coleoptera: Dascillidae) ZHENYU JIN1, 2, ADAM ŚLIPIŃSKI2 & HONG PANG1 1State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Institute of Entomology, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation of Guangdong Higher Education Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Australian National Insect Collection, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Australian species of Notodascillus Carter are revised based on examination of available type material and extensive collections. Three very closely related species have been recognised: N. brevicornis (Macleay), N. sublineatus Carter and N. iviei sp. n. Detailed generic and species descriptions, key to the species and distribution data are provided. Key words: Coleoptera, Dascillidae, taxonomy, new species, Australia Introduction Dascillidae are a small and rarely studied family that, jointly with the Rhipiceridae, form the superfamily Dascilloidea among the polyphagan beetles. In the past Dascillidae were defined very broadly and included taxa now recognized as families (e.g., Artematopodidae, Cneoglossidae, Eulichadidae, Brachypsectridae, Psephenidae and Scirtidae) or taxa now placed within other families (e.g., Platydascillinae and Haematoides Fairmaire to Byturidae, Singularodaemon Pic to Ptilodactylidae, Pseudokarumia Pic to Telegeusidae, Cydistus to Phengodidae incertae sedis, etc.) (Pic 1914; Crowson 1971; Lawrence 2005).
    [Show full text]