Rare Aquatic Insects, Or How Valuable Are Bugs? Richard W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rare Aquatic Insects, Or How Valuable Are Bugs? Richard W Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 3 The Endangered Species: A Symposium Article 8 12-1-1979 Rare aquatic insects, or how valuable are bugs? Richard W. Baumann Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Recommended Citation Baumann, Richard W. (1979) "Rare aquatic insects, or how valuable are bugs?," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol3/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. RARE AQUATIC INSECTS, OR HOW VALUABLE ARE BUGS? Richard W. Bauinann' Abstract.— Insects are an important element in the analysis of aquatic ecosystems, (1) because the limited dis- persal abilities of many aquatic species means that they must make a living under existing conditions, and (2) be- cause they are often sensitive to slight changes in water and stream quality, thus making excellent indicators of the physical and chemical conditions in a system. Examples of rare, ecologically sensitive species are presented from the Plecoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Trichoptera. Detailed studies of rare aquatic insect species should produce impor- tant information on critical habitats that will be useful in the protection of endangered and threatened species in other groups of animals and plants. I use the term rare instead of endangered the distribution patterns of certain species fit or threatened, because no aquatic insects are nicely with a model of island biogeography. presently on the United States hst of endan- Many stoneflies (Plecoptera) are mostly re- gered fauna. The term is still relative, stricted to pristine habitats characterized by though, because my experience indicates that cold, clean continuously flowing streams at nearly every species can be plentiful if high elevations or in special spring-fed habi- sought at the right place at the right time. tats. It thus follows that if the particular hab- Aquatic insects are useful to anyone study- itat in which they occur is threatened, then ing aquatic habitats because they usually they almost automatically become rare and meet two criteria that are essential in assess- may become extinct. Such species popu- ing aquatic systems. First, they often have lations are often considered relicts of faunas very limited dispersal abilities, which means that were once more prevalent when more that they must stay and make a living under ideal conditions occurred. existing conditions. Second, they are often Studies on the stonefly genus Amphine- sensitive to slight changes in water quality, so mura (Baumann and Gaufin 1972, Bauman their presence or absence tells something 1976) showed that it was a Palearctic genus about the physical and chemical conditions in that had extended into the Neotropical the system. Realm and was still present in western North Because the conditions present in a given America in limited relictual populations. Al- habitat determine which species can live though four species showed fairly wide distri- there, these organisms become living in- bution patterns in the United States and Mex- dicators of water quality in aquatic ecosys- ico, three species were restricted to a single tems. If these organisms are invertebrates mountain range. Amphinemura apache oc- which exist at low levels in the food web, this curred in the Chiricahua Mountains of Ari- is an advantage. Invertebrates are easier to zona, A. reinerti, was limited to Sierra Potosi, study than are larger animals, because they Mexico, and A. piiehhi was found in a moun- are more abundant and usually do not carry tain drainage near Veracruz, Mexico. the emotional stigma associated with large These A7nphinemiira species are poor fliers vertebrates. They can also indicate adverse and almost need a water connection for dis- habitat problems sooner, so that adjustments persal. They live only in small streams that can be made in water or stream quality be- flow all year around and are of high quality. fore the top carnivores are severely affected. Their distribution patterns closely follow the During my studies of aquatic insects in spruce-fir and high pine forests in the south- western North America, I have found that western United States and Mexico. They are 'Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Prove, Utah 84602. 65 66 Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 3 thus good indicators of a special aquatic habi- esting examples and their special habitat re- tat in western North America. quirements are: Goriella baiimanni, organic Another example of restricted distribution ooze in spring seeps; Psychronia costalis, in the stoneflies is Capnia lacustra Jewett, small meadow streams above 8,000 feet; Des- which only occurs in Lake Tahoe. It carries mona bethida, small spring streams. on its entire life cycle under water at depths The number of rare aquatic insects is quite of 100-400 feet (Jewett 1963, 1965). Only large because of the number of different one other similar stonefly is known, and that aquatic habitats available and the ability of is the genus Baikaloperia (Zapekina-Dulkeit insects to fit into relatively small niches with- and Zhiltzova 1973), in Lake Baikal, Siberia. in those habitats. This is actually a positive It is also wingless and possesses similar mor- value, however, because it allows the re- phological and ecological traits. It is not sur- searcher to more closely understand the eco- prising that these two deep, ancient lakes system since it can be divided into smaller contain similar rare species which evolved parts. under specialized conditions and will be lost Two final examples of rare insects that if their habitat is destroyed. have very specific habitat requirements are Much attention has been given to several the met-winged midges and the water penny fish species that occur in the Colorado River beetles. drainage such as the Humpback Chub, Ra- Net-winged midges are flies which have zorback Sucker, and Colorado River Squaw- become adapted to living in torrenticolus fish. These fish developed through time in habitats. The larvae are greatly modified into another type of specialized habitat that ex- chitonlike organisms that attach themselves cluded the salmonids and allowed other taxa to the substrate by sucking discs. They live to radiate into the open niches. Invertebrate only in clean, cold, well-aerated waters species have also developed imder similar which have a stable, smooth-grained sub- conditions and several forms also occur in the strate. Thus they can be excellent indicators Colorado River drainage. Edmunds (1976) of these habitat conditions that occur at falls lists several mayfly species which are rare and quick-flowing mountain torrents. Hogue and restricted to the Colorado River drainage (1973) lists several Blephariceridae species and similar large warm rivers in western that are presently known only from a single North America. locality or mountain range. This is not simply The following are a few examples of rare an artifact of incomplete collecting, but a re- mayfly species and an indication of where sult of poor adult dispersal ability plus the they occur in the United States: Analetris very specialized habitat requirements of the eximia. Green River; Lachlonia saskotchewa- larvae noted earlier. nensis. Green, Colorado, and White Rivers; Water penny beetles have an adult stage Anepeorus rusticus. Green River; Home- tliat looks like a terrestrial beetle but a larval oneuria sp. Escalante and Colorado Rivers. stage that is highly modifed for life on the These invertebrate species provide additional bottom of streams. The larva is greatly flat- evidence that our large, warm, western rivers tened so that the head and appendages are contain animal species that have adapted to completely hidden under the thoracic and special conditions critical for their survival. abdominal sclerites. The single eastern spe- Caddisflies or the Trichoptera are inter- cies Psephenus herricki is rather widely dis- esting insects that occur in a wide variety of tributed, but the five known western species aquatic habitats. Most are good fliers and dis- have very restricted distributions (Brown and tribute freely, but many species are restricted Murvosh 1974). Two species, P. montanus to a certain habitat because of the larval re- (White Mountains, Arizona) and P. arizo- quirements. nensis (Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona) have Wiggins (1977) published an outstanding very limited areas of occurrence. An inter- distri- work that makes it possible for any trained esting note is that this type of limited biologist to classify caddisfly larvae to genus. bution pattern is also exhibited by several Thus it provides another tool for evaluating species in the Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and habitats using aquatic insects. A few inter- Ephemeroptera. 1979 The Endangered Species: A Symposium 67 Many more examples of "rare" aquatic in- should place renewed emphasis on studies of sects could be given which probably fit into them. We must, however, be aware of the the endangered or threatened categories as fact that people in general do not imderstand presently understood. They are exciting to the scientific value of insects and might react me for pure scientific studies of zoogeo- poorly to "bugs" being used to justify the graphy and phylogeny. However, I feel that preservation and conservation of special eco- the real value is not simply to say "I found systems. However, scientific investigations of another rare creature," but instead to make high quality must utilize all possible avenues us more sensitive about the critical habitat of investigation if problems are to be solved conditions which produced these rare species. with a minimum expenditure of time, effort, Insects tend to be more abundant and are and resources.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) Based on Larval, Pupal and Adult Characters
    Systematic Entomology (2007), 32, 502–538 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00374.x Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) based on larval, pupal and adult characters CHI-FENG LEE1 , MASATAKA SATOˆ2 , WILLIAM D. SHEPARD3 and M A N F R E D A . J A¨CH4 1Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, 2Dia Cuore 306, Kamegahora 3-1404, Midoriku, Nagoya, 458-0804, Japan, 3Essig Museum of Entomology, 201 Wellman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A., and 4Natural History Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria Abstract. We conducted the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Pse- phenidae, based on 143 morphological characters of adults, larvae and pupae and coded for 34 taxa, representing three outgroups and 31 psephenid genera, including four undescribed ones. A strict consensus tree calculated (439 steps, consistency index ¼ 0.45, retention index ¼ 0.75) from the two most-parsimonious cladograms indicated that the monophyly of the family and subfamilies is supported, with the exception of Eubriinae, which is paraphyletic when including Afroeubria. Here a new subfamily, Afroeubriinae (subfam.n.), is formally estab- lished for Afroeubria. The analysis also indicated that the ‘streamlined’ larva is a derived adaptive radiation. Here, suprageneric taxonomy and the evolution of some significant characters are discussed. Keys are provided to the subfamilies and genera of Psephenidae considering larvae, adults and pupae. Introduction type specimens and the association of adults and immature stages by rearing, five new genera were proposed for Ori- Psephenidae, the ‘water penny’ beetles, are characterized by ental taxa and a well-resolved phylogenetic tree was ob- the peculiar larval body shape (Figs 4–7).
    [Show full text]
  • T TA /Î-T Dissertation Ij L Y L I Information Service
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advstnced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarify on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. T TA /Î-T Dissertation i J l Y l i Information Service University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 N.
    [Show full text]
  • MAINE STREAM EXPLORERS Photo: Theb’S/FLCKR Photo
    MAINE STREAM EXPLORERS Photo: TheB’s/FLCKR Photo: A treasure hunt to find healthy streams in Maine Authors Tom Danielson, Ph.D. ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Kaila Danielson ‐ Kents Hill High School Katie Goodwin ‐ AmeriCorps Environmental Steward serving with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Stream Explorers Coordinators Sally Stockwell ‐ Maine Audubon Hannah Young ‐ Maine Audubon Sarah Haggerty ‐ Maine Audubon Stream Explorers Partners Alanna Doughty ‐ Lakes Environmental Association Brie Holme ‐ Portland Water District Carina Brown ‐ Portland Water District Kristin Feindel ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Maggie Welch ‐ Lakes Environmental Association Tom Danielson, Ph.D. ‐ Maine Department of Environmental Protection Image Credits This guide would not have been possible with the extremely talented naturalists that made these amazing photographs. These images were either open for non‐commercial use and/or were used by permission of the photographers. Please do not use these images for other purposes without contacting the photographers. Most images were edited by Kaila Danielson. Most images of macroinvertebrates were provided by Macroinvertebrates.org, with exception of the following images: Biodiversity Institute of Ontario ‐ Amphipod Brandon Woo (bugguide.net) – adult Alderfly (Sialis), adult water penny (Psephenus herricki) and adult water snipe fly (Atherix) Don Chandler (buigguide.net) ‐ Anax junius naiad Fresh Water Gastropods of North America – Amnicola and Ferrissia rivularis
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies
    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Patrick Center for Environmental Research 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Report No. 10-04F Submitted to: Eastman Chemical Company Tennessee Operations Submitted by: Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 April 20, 2012 Executive Summary he 2010 study was the seventh in a series of comprehensive studies of aquatic biota and Twater chemistry conducted by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in the vicinity of Kingsport, TN. Previous studies were conducted in 1965, 1967 (cursory study, primarily focusing on al- gae), 1974, 1977, 1980, 1990 and 1997. Elements of the 2010 study included analysis of land cover, basic environmental water chemistry, attached algae and aquatic macrophytes, aquatic insects, non-insect macroinvertebrates, and fish. For each study element, field samples were collected and analyzed from Scientists from the Academy's Patrick Center for Environmental Research zones located on the South Fork Holston River have conducted seven major environmental monitoring studies on the (Zones 2, 3 and 5), Big Sluice (Zone 4), mainstem South Fork Holston River since 1965. Holston River (Zone 6), and Horse Creek (Zones HC1and HC2), the approximate locations of which are shown below. The design of the 2010 study was very similar to that of previous surveys, allowing comparisons among surveys. In addition, two areas of potential local impacts were assessed for the first time: Big Tree Spring (BTS, located on the South Fork within Zone 2) and Kit Bottom (KU and KL in the Big Sluice, upstream of Zone 4).
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSACTION's of the MISSOURI ACAD.Emvi of SCIENCE
    TRANSACTION'S Of 'J,; THE MISSOURI ACAD.EMVi' ;; ', ,'' ,,, ,, ,'' ' OF SCIENCE Transactions of The Missouri Academy of Science (Founded in 1934) Officers 1981-82 President ....... ....... ............... E. Allen McGinnes, Jr., University of Missouri-Columbia President-Elect .......... Edward M. Emery, Monsanto Industrial Chemical Company Vice-President . .... Albert R. Gordon, Southwest Missouri State University Past President ....... .Dean A. Rosebery, Northeast Missouri State University Secretary ... ............................. Nathan H. Cook, Lincoln University Treasurer ... ., . .............. Richard McHugh, University of Missouri-Columbia Historian ...... Clayton H. Johnson, University of Missouri-Columbia Director, Collegiate Division ........... Roland A. Hultsch, University of Missouri-Columbia Director, Junior Division ...... Adell Thompson, University of Missouri-Kansas City AAAS Representative Dean A. Rosebery, Northeast Missouri State University, Kirksville, MO 63501 Editorial Staff Editor. John R. Jones, School of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Missoun­ Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 Assistant to the Editor: Sandy Clark, School of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, 112 Stephens Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 Associate Editors: Biology: Jack R Wallin, University of Missouri, Columbia., MO 65211 Chemistry: John E. Bauman, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 Engineering: Gary Muller, University of Missouri, Rolla, MO 65401 Social Science: Rex Campbell, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 SEND ALL MANUSCRIPTS TO Dr. John R Jones, Editor, Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, School of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Missouri­ Columbia, 112 Stephens Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 Publications of the Missouri Academy of Science Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, Volumes 1-6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16 6.00 Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, Double Volumes, 7 & 8, 10 & 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Uwharrie National Forest
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE NC 24/27 WIDENING – UWHARRIE NATIONAL FOREST MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NC TIP NO. R-2527 WBS ELEMENT 35572.1.1 APRIL 2019 Contact Person: Matthew M. Haney Environmental Program Specialist North Carolina Department of Transportation Natural Environment Section Biological Surveys Group 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 919.707.6122 [email protected] Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II. POTENTIAL IMPACTS CONSIDERED ................................................................................. 1 III. SPECIES CONSIDERED AND METHODS ........................................................................... 2 IV. EXISTING BIOLOGICAL CONDITION ............................................................................... 2 A. BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AREA................................................................................................................. 2 B. STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................... 7 C. TIMING OF FIELD SURVEYS ................................................................................................................... 7 D. THREATENED, ENDANGERED, FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN, AND NORTH CAROLINA LISTED SPECIES .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Louis Burrell Carrick
    COPYRIGHT BY LOUIS BURRELL CARRICK 1957 A STUDY OP HYDRAS IN LAKE ERIE Contribution toward a Natural History of the Great Lakes Hydridae DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By LOUIS BURRELL CARRICK, B. A., M. S. •SKHHKHS- The Ohio State University 19 £6 Approved by: Advisor / Department of Zoology and Entomology TABLE OP CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1 I. PROBLEMS OP TAXONOMY ................. 7 1. CRITERIA FOR THE GE N E R A ............... 7 2. METHODS USED FOR SPECIES DETERMINATION .... 11 3. IDENTIFICATION OP THE. LAKE ERIE SPECIES . 16 (a) Hydra ollgactis Pallas, 1776 ............ 17 (b) Hydra pseudollgaotis (Hyman, 1931) .... 20 (c) Hydra amerlcana Hyman, 1929 21 (d) Hydra littoralls Hyman, 1931 . .. 23 (e) Hydra came a L. Agassiz, l8jp0 .... 2I4. II. HABITATS AND DISTRIBUTION IN THE GREAT LAKES . 27 1. ABIOTIC HABITAT FACTORS AFFECTING DISTRIBUTION ................................ 29 2. DISCUSSION OF HABITATS AND DISTRIBUTION- RECORDS .............................. 32 (a) Aggregations on N e t s ..................... 34 (b) occurrence in the Plankton ............... 47 (c) Deep-Water Communities................... 49 (d) Vegetation Zones ......................... 54 (e) Lake Erie Island Ponds ................... 60 (f) Wave-swept S h o r e s ....................... 65 - ii - III. COMMUNITY INTERACTIONS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO H. LITTORALIS............................. 67 1. METHODS USED IN THE STUDY A R E A ........ 69 2. SEASONAL ABUNDANCE ..................... 8l (a) The Annual C y c l e .................. 86 (b) Reproductive Potential under Culture C o n d i t i o n s ........................... 95 (c) Survival under Adverse Conditions .... 108 3. CHANGING AGGREGATIONS IN THE MICROHABITATS.
    [Show full text]
  • The of North Carolina
    The of North Carolina Tropisternus lateralis A Biologist’s Handbook with Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels S. R. Beaty Biological Assessment Unit Division of Water Quality North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Version 2.1 20 October 2011 Table of Contents Families and genera of true aquatic Coleoptera occurring in North Carolina INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... ii Adephaga Polyphaga GYRINIDAE HELOPHORIDAE Dineutus ............................................................................ 1 Helophorus ..................................................................... 29 Gyrinus ............................................................................. 1 HYDROCHIDAE Spanglerogyrus* ............................................................... 2 Hydrochus ...................................................................... 30 HALIPLIDAE HYDROPHILIDAE Haliplus ............................................................................ 3 Hydrophilinae Peltodytes.......................................................................... 4 Anacaena ........................................................................ 31 DYTISCIDAE Berosus ........................................................................... 32 Copelatinae Cymbiodyta .................................................................... 32 Copelatus .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Global Phylogeny of the Water Penny Beetles Using Both Molecular and Morphological Evidence (Co Mathew Vincent Wood Western Kentucky University, [email protected]
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Spring 2016 Global Phylogeny of the Water Penny Beetles Using Both Molecular and Morphological Evidence (Co Mathew Vincent Wood Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Wood, Mathew Vincent, "Global Phylogeny of the Water Penny Beetles Using Both Molecular and Morphological Evidence (Co" (2016). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 1560. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1560 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBAL PHYLOGENY OF THE WATER PENNY BEETLES USING BOTH MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE (COLEOPTERA: PSEPHENIDAE) A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Matthew Vincent Wood May 2016 I dedicate this thesis to my parents, Markeeta and Barry Wood, who have always been there for me and supported me throughout my education and my life. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First off I would like to thank my advisor Professor T. Keith Philips, who has helped me at every turn in completing this thesis. I would also like to thank the Western Kentucky University Biotechnology Center for access to equipment and space for my research and analysis. Thanks to Naomi Rowland for her help with optimizing molecular protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa
    Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa Volume 10: Coleoptera Editors: R Stals & IJ de Moor TT 320/07 Water Research Commission Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa Volume 10: Coleoptera Editors: R Stals & IJ de Moor Prepared for the Water Research Commission December 2007 WRC Report No. TT 320/07 ii Freshwater Invertebrate Guide 10: Coleoptera x Obtainable from: [email protected] or Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina Pretoria 0031 South Africa The publication of this guide emanates from a WRC research project entitled: The Invertebrates of South Africa – Identification Keys (WRC Project No. K5/916) DISCLAIMER This book has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ISBN 978-1-77005-629-9 Printed in the Republic of South Africa Cover photograph: Hygropetric habitat, Bridal Veil Falls, Chimanimani Mountains, Zimbabwe. Photographer: Koos van der Lende. Since there is a possibility that revised editions of this series of guides may be printed in the future, we welcome constructive suggestions, particularly in relation to keys used to identify various taxa. These suggestions should be submitted in writing to the Water Research Commission (address given above). All such correspondence must be marked 'For the attention of the Director, Water-linked Ecosystems, (Project K5/916/0/1)'. iii CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ...................................................................... viii Geographical region covered by this guide .................................... ix About the authors and editors ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Cheloniellid Arthropod with Large Raptorial Appendages from the Silurian of Wisconsin, USA
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407379; this version posted September 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. New cheloniellid arthropod with large raptorial appendages from the Silurian of Wisconsin, USA Andrew J. Wendruff1*, Loren E. Babcock2, Donald G. Mikulic3, Joanne Kluessendorf4 1 Department of Biology and Earth Science, Otterbein University, Westerville, Ohio, United States of America, 2 Department of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, 3 Illinois Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America, 4 Weis Earth Science Museum, University of Wisconsin-Fox Valley, Menasha, Wisconsin, United States of America *[email protected] Abstract Cheloniellids comprise a small, distinctive group of Paleozoic arthropods of whose phylogenetic relationships within the Arthropoda remain unresolved. A new form, Xus yus, n. gen, n. sp. is reported from the Waukesha Lagerstatte in the Brandon Bridge Formation (Silurian: Telychian), near Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA. Exceptionally preserved specimens show previously poorly known features including biramous appendages; this is the first cheloniellid to show large, anterior raptorial appendages. We emend the diagnosis of Cheloniellida; cephalic appendages are uniramous and may include raptorial appendages; trunk appendages are biramous. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407379; this version posted September 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Diatom Viability in Insect Fecal Material: Comparison Between Two Species, Achnanthidium Lanceolatum and Synedra Ulna
    Hydrobiologia 501: 93–99, 2003. 93 © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Diatom viability in insect fecal material: comparison between two species, Achnanthidium lanceolatum and Synedra ulna Christopher G. Peterson1 & Tracy L. Jones2,3 1Department of Natural Science, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60626, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60626, U.S.A. 3Present address: School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115, U.S.A. Received 25 July 2002; in revised form 25 April 2003; accepted 19 May 2003 Key words: gut passage, diatoms, cell viability, Synedra ulna, Achnanthidium lanceolatum, insect feces, water penny larvae Abstract We examined differences in digestibility and viability following gut passage through water penny larvae (Psephenus herricki)ofSynedra ulna and Achnanthidium lanceoloatum, two common diatom taxa that differ in growth habit and autecological characteristics. Prior to the experiment, diatoms were cultured in Chu-10 media in petri plates to establish a monospecific biofilm to offer grazers. After collection, insects were left to clear their guts over night, allowed to graze for 3 hours on diatom biofilms, and then placed in vials over 1-mm mesh to defecate. Samples from source material and from insect feces were mounted in syrup media and the ratio of chloroplast- containing to empty diatom frustules was microscopically assessed. In addition, subsamples from source material and feces were sprayed onto agar plates prepared with Chu-10 and individual cells were mapped and tracked for 5 days to quantify reproduction.
    [Show full text]