DOCSLIB.ORG

General and Mandatory Registration of Idps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General and Mandatory Registration of Idps MARCH / JUNE 2013 YEAR # 8 GENERAL AND MANDATORY AMENDING THE LAW OF GEORGIA ON REGISTRATION OF IDPS IDPS The MRA made a decision to carry out the registration of A working group- commission was set up at the Ministry, IDPs and currently operates their comprehensive electronic which, amongst others, aimed to improve legislation database. The foremost objective of IDPs registration is related to IDPs and eventually draft a new law which would to ensure accessibility bring the legislation in of renewed information line with international and profile of the IDP human rights standards. population and up to The office of the Public date information on Defender of Georgia, their families. These the Georgian Young data will as well be Lawyers Association used to profile families (GYLA), United Nations and individual IDPs to High Commissioner for identify their needs and Refugees (UNHCR), offer possible long-term Norwegian Refugee solutions. The results Council (NRC), Danish of registration will be Refugee Council (DRC) used for national level and Public Programs policy formulation as well as its renewal, monitoring tool Fund took part in Commission’s work. for assessing interventions to assist the IDP population. The draft bill developed as a result of the Commission’s As a result of the registration/individual profiling it will be work was discussed with a UN expert Alhemone Abebe possible to: who has reviewed the document after which the final draft Define exact number of IDPs and their families; identify version of the document was prepared. strategic solutions for improving IDPs’ housing conditions; The Law of Georgia on Internally Displaced Persons from study socio-economic profiles of IDPs; renew IDPs the Occupied Territories of Georgia – adopted in1996 – electronic database and gather new information and is in need of considerable improvement of the whole prioritization of IDPs in order to offer needs-based targeted spectrum of legal issues and adequate reflection of IDPs assistance. situation in the context of their rights. The current law also requires improvement in terms of legal structure and legal The next objective of the registration process is to elaborate technique. universal approach and method for continues registration throughout the country. The draft law presented aims to put in place legal mechanisms which would ensure protection of citizens The renewed registration will be carried out at the level and first aid in case of forceful displacement, protection of of municipalities/districts trough individual interviews IDPs rights during the whole period of displacement. The conducted by commission members. The registration document also more accurately reflects today’s realities, will start on 01.08.2013 and be complete on 27.12.2013. state policy towards IDPs and action plan which would During the process, the commission will relocate from one also address challenges before the country. district to the other. More detailed information on these issues with exact dates and locations for the registration The Draft Law’s main novelties include: according to municipalities can be obtained through hotline The bill develops a comprehensive notion of an Internally Displaced Person. Specifically, “A citizen of Georgia MINISTRY’S HOTLINE: WORKING HOURS: (except weekends) of MRA of the municipalities themselves. on reimbursement of sum in case of termination and then reinstatement of allowance, the allowance will be resumed from first day of the following month after decision on the allowance’s resumption. Reimbursement will be made for the omitted period but for no longer than one year from the day of suspension of the allowance. The law also specifies IDPs rights with regards to accommodation and regulations on their eviction from temporary accommodation. Specifically, measures to be carried out by central and local government for eviction of IDPs from spaces transferred into legal ownership of third persons with ensuring their dignity, security and freedom. The draft law also envisions the right of restitution of or a person with a status of person without citizenship property left on the place of permanent residence. in Georgia can be qualified as an IDP who was forced It also sets out guarantees of IDPs integration in different to leave his/her place of permanent residence due to a party of the country until their return and reintegration to danger of his/her of health or life or that of his/her family their permanent residence place so that conditions for members as a result occupation of territory by a foreign secure and dignified life are ensured. state, aggression, armed conflict, mass violence and/ or mass violation of human rights and/or impossibility of his/her return to the place of permanent residence due to the abovementioned reasons.” With the improvement of notion of IDPs shortcomings in the context of their rights’ protection will be eliminated. Receiving of state aid due to a person qualified as below poverty line is no longer a basis for termination IDP allowance. The law allows an IDP to receive both IDP allowance and allowance for persons below poverty line if he/she qualifies as such. The proposed law specifies reasons for suspension, termination and reinstatement of IDP allowance. Guided by analogy of regulations of the Law on State Pension CO-OPERATION WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND DIPLOMATIC CORPS During the period of March-June 2013, the Minister of izations, diplomatic representatives and non-governmen- the IDPs from Occupied Territories and Accommodation tal agencies. The Ministry’s partners expressed readiness of Georgia (MRA) continued meetings with international to continue co-operation with the aim of solving problems organizations and diplomatic corps informing them on for Georgia’s IDP population. the ministry’s work and plans. These meetings aimed at The EU – one of the main partners of the ministry – has strengthening the ongoing co-operation and discussing supported many projects focused at improving the living future projects, most importantly, the ministry’s top prior- conditions of IDPs. The IDP Program III funded by EU ity – improving durable housing conditions and livelihood supports construction of IDP accommodation and infra- of IDPs. The Minister met with the heads of missions and structure. 7 apartment blocks will be constructed in Poti representatives of: the European Union, the Council of Eu- for 280 IDP families and the preparatory works for the rope, UNHCR, USAID, DRC and other international organ- rehabilitation of 28 apartment blocks is underway. IDP III will continue into IDP IV which will mainly focus on the im- proving of IDP livelihood opportunities and their economic milieu. Also, the investment of 8 million Euro in the con- struction works is planned. The livelihood program will be implemented by the Legal Entity of Public Law established under the auspices of the MRA. The LEPL will function in compliance with the Livelihood Strategy, which is in the process of elaboration by the MRA in close cooperation with international organizations, governmental agencies and national NGOs. As a result of cooperation with other international donor organizations some construction works have been initi- ated. KfW started construction of 8 apartment blocks in MARCH / JUNE 2013 YEAR Zugdidi for 256 families. With the support of USAID 10 tated building, or an apartment/house. The document will idle buildings will be rehabilitated in Imereti region, which be adopted in the form of the normative act and it will guar- will accommodate about 500 families, in addition to that 6 antee that the distribution of durable housing spaces is fair new idle buildings and another 6 collective centers will be and is based on the IDP needs. rehabilitated. MRA received 32 buildings form the Minis- In addition to the above-mentioned issue the meeting with try of Economy for rehabilitation to accommodate IDPs in Chaloka Beyani, a special UN Rapporteur on the Human Tbilisi, Rustavi, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe, Zugdidi, Martvili, Poti, Rights of Internally Displaced Persons shall be empha- Makhinjauri etc. These sized. The discussions with constructions add up Mr. Beyani concerned a re- to the planned housing cently adopted UN resolu- provision by the gov- tion on Georgia’s internally ernment of Georgia, displaced persons which which allocated 183 recognizes their existence 0002 meters for the and stresses the need to construction works in focus on their needs. At the Tbilisi and at this stage meeting, results of the min- the design works are istry’s work and issues in the being implemented. context of improving IDPs In order to ensure the livelihoods were discussed. transparent process of housing allocation, a document has The Minister also stressed the importance of practical im- been created determining criteria of IDP housing as a re- plementation of the rapporteur’s recommendations. sult of Ministry’s co-operation with partner organizations The Ministry will continue successful co-operation with rel- such as DRC, the UNHCR, NRC and GYLA. Until now, no evant international organizations on issues such as IDPs clearly-defined criteria have been set out. The criteria will rights, issues concerning eco-migrants and repatriation be similar like grading system, which will be summarized processes. Continuation of this co-operation will be posi- while estimating the needs of displaced families. Judged tively reflected on social and livelihoods of the communi- by these criteria, displaced families will be provided with ties concerned as more projects will be implemented in durable housing – be it newly constructed or a rehabili- support of IDPs. TARGETED INITIATIVE GEORGIA - TIG Since December 2010 the Ministry has hosted a project called qualification needed for finding a decent job was offered Targeted Initiative for Georgia to support reintegration of to 211 migrants. Employment mediation services offered Georgian returning migrants and the implementation of the by TIG Job Counseling and Placement Centers in Tbilisi EU - Georgia Readmission Agreement. The project is in its and Kutaisi were used by 328 persons of which 72 found third year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • Tour from Kutaisi Cultural & Sightseeing Tours
    Samegrelo private tour from Kutaisi Cultural & Sightseeing Tours Overview Day Trip to Martvili Canyon, Zugdidi, ethno-village Sisa Tura and Nokalakevi from Kutaisi Starts from: Kutaisi Available: All Year Driving distance: 250 km Type: Private Full day trip Duration: 10 hours The private guided day trip to Samegrelo from Kutaisi offers visiting one of the oldest kingdoms of Georgia and its former capital town Zugdidi. During the day, visit four main sites: a natural wonder of Martvili Canyon , Ethno-Village Sisa Tura, Dadiani Palace and Nokalakevi acropolis & archaeological site. Lunch will be served in a traditional Colchian Oda House. Have a fantastic day ahead! Tour details Code: KUT-PT-S01 Starts from: Kutaisi Max. Group Size: 15 Adults Duration: Full Day Prices Group size Price per adult Solo 181 € 2-3 people 103 € 4-5 people 63 € 6-7 people 56 € 8-9 people 47 € 10-15 people 43 € *Online booking deposit: 15 € 1 person from the group will be FREE of charge if 10 and more adults are traveling together Child Policy 0-1 years - Free 2-6 years - 22 € 7 years and over - Adult * Online booking deposit will be deducted from the total tour price. The balance can be paid in one of the following ways: Bank transfer - Euro/USD/GBP, any time, but not later than two weeks before the tour starts; VISA/Master card - GEL only (local currency), via POS terminal, directly with your guide at the beginning of the tour. Card service fee + 3%. Cash - GEL only, directly to the nearest TBC Bank office or TBC Bank Cash terminal no later than begging of the tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia
    The Churches of Mtskheta: Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia Samantha Johnson Senior Art History Thesis December 14, 2017 The small town of Mtskheta, located near Tbilisi, the capital of the Republic of Georgia, is the seat of the Georgian Orthodox Church and is the heart of Christianity in the country. This town, one of the oldest in the nation, was once the capital and has been a key player throughout Georgia’s tumultuous history, witnessing not only the nation’s conversion to Christianity, but also the devastation of foreign invasions. It also contains three churches that are national symbols and represent the two major waves of church building in the seventh and eleventh centuries. Georgia is, above all, a Christian nation and religion is central to its national identity. This paper examines the interaction between incoming foreign cultures and deeply-rooted local traditions that have shaped art and architecture in Transcaucasia.1 Nestled among the Caucasus Mountains, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, present-day Georgia contains fewer than four million people and has its own unique alphabet and language as well as a long, complex history. In fact, historians cannot agree on how Georgia got its English exonym, because in the native tongue, kartulad, the country is called Sakartvelo, or “land of the karvelians.”2 They know that the name “Sakartvelo” first appeared in texts around 800 AD as another name for the eastern kingdom of Kartli in Transcaucasia. It then evolved to signify the unified eastern and western kingdoms in 1008.3 Most scholars agree that the name “Georgia” did not stem from the nation’s patron saint, George, as is commonly thought, but actually comes 1 This research addresses the multitude of influences that have contributed to the development of Georgia’s ecclesiastical architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review
    UNECE Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review UNITED NATIONS ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS GEORGIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2016 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 43 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Georgia (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 30) in 2010. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.16.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117101-3 e-ISBN 978-92-1-057683-3 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword It is essential to monitor progress towards environmental sustainability and to evaluate how countries reconcile environmental and economic targets and meet their international environmental commitments. Through regular monitoring and evaluation, countries may more effectively stay ahead of emerging environmental issues, improve their environmental performance and be accountable to their citizens. The ECE Environmental Performance Review Programme provides valuable assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance so that they can take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Primary Education Project
    GEORGIA PRIMARY EDUCATION PROJECT BASELINE/IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Contract No. AID-114-C-09-00003 USAID COR: Medea Kakachia Chief of Party: Nancy Parks June 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 1 Table of Contents The Context ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of Impact Baseline Study ............................................................................................................................. 3 Study Design ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Pilot and Control Group School Sampling and Selection Process ................................................................. 7 Selection of Students for Baseline Study ............................................................................................................. 10 Test Administration Manuals ................................................................................................................................... 10 Development of Reading and Math Diagnostic Assessment Tools ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 66462-GE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 25.8 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$40.00 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$30 MILLION TO GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SECOND SECONDARY AND LOCAL ROADS PROJECT (SLRP-II) FEBRUARY 21, 2012 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 1, 2012) Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) GEL 1.66 = US$ 1.00 US$1.551 = SDR 1.00 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation ADB Asian Development Bank MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources CPS Country Partnership Strategy MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development EA Environmental Assessment MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure EIB European Investment Bank NBG National Bank of Georgia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NCB National Competitive Bidding EMP Environmental Management Plan NPV Net Present Value ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework FA Financing Agreement PAD
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling-Up Multi-Hazard Early Warning System and the Use of Climate Information in Georgia
    Annex VI (b) – Environmental and Social Assessment Report Green Climate Fund Funding Proposal I Scaling-up Multi-Hazard Early Warning System and the Use of Climate Information in Georgia Environmental and Social Assessment Report FP-UNDP-5846-Annex-VIb-ENG 1 Annex VI (b) – Environmental and Social Assessment Report Green Climate Fund Funding Proposal I CONTENTS Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Description of the Project ............................................................................................................ 10 1.2.1 Summary of Activities .......................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Project Alternatives ..................................................................................................................... 27 1.3.1 Do Nothing Alternative ........................................................................................................ 27 1.3.2 Alternative Locations ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • • Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the Caucasus • Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the Caucasus •Sustainable Ag
    • Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the SustainableCaucasus Agriculture in Central• AsiaSustainable and the Caucasus 4 AgriculturElements of ae Nationalin StrategyCentral forAsia Managementand the and CaucasusUse of Plant • SustainableGenetic ResourcesAgricultur in Georgia e in CentralCalvinAsia O. andQualsetthe Caucasus • Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the Caucasus • Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the Caucasus •Sustainable Ag ELEMENTS OF A NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR MANAGEMENT AND USE OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES IN GEORGIA GCP/GLO/162/EC – Georgia (9) August 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS with the support of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION and in collaboration with the INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS Contributors Dr. Calvin O. Qualset University of California at Davis To be cited as: Qualset, Calvin O. (2009). Elements of a National Strategy for Management and Use of Plant Genetic Resources in Georgia. Sustainable Agriculture in Central Asia and the Caucasus No.4. ICARDACAC/FAO 2009. 87 pp. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, or of ICARDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or ICARDA in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Page 1 of 12
    Georgia Page 1 of 12 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » Europe and Eurasia » Georgia Georgia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR International Religious Freedom Report 2010 November 17, 2010 The constitution provides for freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The government generally respected religious freedom in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. As in the previous reporting period, the government's focus largely concentrated on national security challenges, and the implementation of policies relating to religious freedom slowed. There were continued reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. There were reports of incidents of harassment in Tbilisi and the regions outside of Tbilisi involving local citizens, government officials, and Orthodox provocateurs. The Public Defender's Office (PDO) human rights ombudsman reported several cases of harassment during the reporting period. Systemic problems remained largely unchanged, such as the return of church property, legal registration of denominations, unequal legal frameworks, and negative media coverage of non- Orthodox religious groups. However, the PDO marked International Tolerance Day for the first time, and the public defender acknowledged the efforts of leading civil society activists and organizations awarded as "Advocates of Tolerance." Additionally, the president and the minister of reintegration attended the opening of a new synagogue in Tbilisi, and a church in Rabati, in the Akhaltsikhe district, was returned to the Roman Catholic Church in December 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Impact Assessment Report GEO: Adjaristsqali
    Environment Impact Assessment Report Project on Relocation of Batumi (Angisa) - Akhaltsikhe Intrastate Highway Section on Khulo Municipality Project Number: 47919 – 014 06 August 2015 GEO: Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project Prepared by Gamma Consulting Limited for Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC (AGL) as a requirement of the Asian Development Bank This environment impact assessment report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. EIA Road Batumi - Akhaltsikhe Page 1 of 123 Adjaristskali Georgia LLC Project on Relocation of Batumi (Angisa) - Akhaltsikhe Intrastate Highway Section on Khulo Municipality Environmental Impact Assessment Report (Draft version) Executor Ltd Gamma Consulting Director V. Gvakharia Tbilisi 2015 Gamma Consulting EIA Road Batumi - Akhaltsikhe Page 2 of 123 GAMMA Consulting Ltd. 17a. Guramishvili av, 0192, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +(995 32) 260 44 33 +(995 32) 260 15 27 E-mail: [email protected] www.gamma.ge; www.facebook.com/gammaconsultingGeorgia Table of Contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    PLANT EXPLORATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA TO COLLECT GERMPLASM FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT August 26- September 14, 2007 Participants: Joe-Ann H. McCoy, USDA/ ARS/ NPGS, Medicinal Plant Curator North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station G212 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1170 Phone: 515-294-2297 Fax: 515-294-1903 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Barbara Hellier, USDA/ ARS/ NPGS, Horticulture Crops Curator Western Regional Plant Introduction Station 59 Johnson Hall, WSU, PO Box 646402, Pullman, WA 99164-6402 Phone: 509-335-3763 Fax: 509-335-6654 Email: [email protected] Georgian Participants: Ana Gulbani Georgian Plant Genetic Resource Centre, Research Institute of Farming Tserovani, Mtskheta, 3300 Georgia. www.cac-biodiversity.org Phone: 995 99 96 7071 Fax: 995 32 26 5256 Email: [email protected] Marina Mosulishvili, Senior Scientist, Institute of Botany Georgian National Museum 3, Rustaveli Ave., Tbilisi 0105 GEORGIA Phone: 995 32 29 4492 / 995 99 55 5089 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Sandro Okropiridze Mosulishvili, Driver Sandro [email protected] (From Left – Marina Mosulishvili, Sandro Okropiridze, Joe-Ann McCoy, Barbara Hellier, Ana Gulbani below Mt. Kazbegi) 2 Acknowledgements: ¾ The expedition was funded by the USDA/ARS Plant Exchange Office, Beltsville, Maryland ¾ Representatives from the Georgia National Museum and the Georgian Plant Genetic Resources Center planned the itinerary and made all transportation, lodging and guide arrangements ¾ Special thanks
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010
    WHO DOES WHAT WHERE IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN GEORGIA Second edition March 2010 Georgian National Committee of Disaster Risk Reduction & Environment Sustainable Development FOREWORD Georgia is a highly disaster-prone country, which frequently experiences natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, floods, landslides, mudflows, avalanches, and drought) as well as man-made emergencies (e.g. industrial accidents and traffic accidents). Compounding factors such as demographic change, unplanned urbanization, poorly maintained infrastructure, lax enforcement of safety standards, socio-economic inequities, epidemics, environmental degradation and climate variability amplify the frequency and intensity of disasters and call for a proactive and multi-hazard approach. Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting and complex development issue. It requires political and legal commitment, public understanding, scientific knowledge, careful development planning, responsible enforcement of policies and legislation, people-centred early warning systems, and effective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Close collaboration of policy-makers, scientists, urban planners, engineers, architects, development workers and civil society representatives is a precondition for adopting a comprehensive approach and inventing adequate solutions. Multi-stakeholder and inter-agency platforms can help provide and mobilize knowledge, skills and resources required for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policies, for coordination of planning and programmes,
    [Show full text]