DOCSLIB.ORG

Winding Road to DNA Jan Witkowski Lauds an Account of the Half-Obscured Scientists Whose Work Helped to Reveal the Double Helix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winding Road to DNA Jan Witkowski Lauds an Account of the Half-Obscured Scientists Whose Work Helped to Reveal the Double Helix COMMENT SPRING BOOKS GENETICS Winding road to DNA Jan Witkowski lauds an account of the half-obscured scientists whose work helped to reveal the double helix. ong before the double helix was by botanists Hugo de discovered in 1953, biochemists vied Vries, Carl Correns to determine the enigmatic nature of and Erich Tschermak. LDNA. As early as 1914, chemist Walter Jones Williams adds imme- wrote (in his monograph Nucleic Acids) that diacy to the tale of pea the macromolecules “constitute what is possi- plants and heredity bly the best understood field of Physiological by starting with an Chemistry”. Cytologists, geneticists and even encounter between physicists, however, also co-authored the Mendel and C. W. Eich- story of DNA. ling, whose story was Unravelling the In Unravelling the Double Helix, medical Double Helix: The new to me. A German historian Gareth Williams illuminates key Lost Heroes of DNA seller of exotic flow- research in the 85 years between the dis- GARETH WILLIAMS ers, he visited Mendel coveries of nuclein, as it was first known, Weidenfeld & Nicolson in Brünn, Austria, in and the double helix. He refreshes a familiar (2019) 1878, looking for new chronicle by ending there, rather than using varieties. He later pub- it as a stepping stone to the Human Genome lished a verbatim account of his conversa- Project, epigenetics or gene editing. More- tion with Mendel — the only one in existence over, he eschews the ‘mountain top’ approach (C. W. Eichling J. Hered. 33, 243–246; 1942). — featuring individuals synonymous with The contributions of cytology contin- major advances. Instead, he shines a light ued in the early twentieth century with the on lesser-known scientists struggling, as work of Walter Sutton. (Williams could also philosopher Bertrand Russell put it, to bring have mentioned Nettie Stevens and William into the world “some little bit of new wisdom”. Cannon.) They recognized that the distribu- Williams starts in 1868, the beginning of a tion of chromosomes during mitosis and mei- biochemistry golden age. Biologist Friedrich osis mirrored what was expected of Mendel’s Miescher, working with physiologist Felix hereditary ‘factors’, and showed that specific Hoppe-Seyler in Tübingen, Germany, was chromosomes were associated with sex. The then developing a technique for isolating cell fusion of genetics and cytology came in the nuclei from the white blood cells in pus. He 1910s, when Thomas Hunt Morgan and his extracted a strange, fluffy substance from the colleagues mapped the chromosomal loca- nuclei, dubbing it nuclein. Moving to Basel tions of fruit-fly mutations. in his native Switzerland, he determined its Physicists’ work in the field was at first chemical formula using nuclei from salmon theoretical. In 1944, Erwin Schrödinger sperm. A decade later, cytologist Walther published What Is Life?, which built on work Flemming was studying division in sala- by biophysicist Max Delbrück to suggest that mander cells by staining them with dyes; he genes were “aperiodic crystals”. This influ- revealed coloured threads that he called chro- enced physicists including Francis Crick and matin (chromosomes). In 1882, he showed Maurice Wilkins (see P. Ball Nature 560, 548– with great clarity their behaviour in the repli- 550; 2018 ). But physics really entered the fray cation processes of mitosis and meiosis. when X-ray crystallography was harnessed to Genetics enters the picture in 1900, when study biological macromolecules. abbot-scientist Gregor Mendel’s research on That field was tiny in the 1920s. William principles of inheritance was rediscovered Astbury, J. D. Bernal and Kathleen Lonsdale worked at the Royal Institution in London NEW IN Relativity: The Special and the General Theory — 100th Anniversary Edition PAPERBACK Albert Einstein, Hanoch Gutfreund & Jürgen Renn PRINCETON UNIV. PRESS (2019) First published in English in 1920, Albert Einstein’s popular introduction to his Highlights of this world-shaking theories reveals what he dubbed his “step-motherly” approach. season’s releases. This authoritative centenary edition is a fitting tribute to Einstein’s efforts to make his concepts accessible — in turn, helping to raise the profile of basic science and modern physics on a global scale. Insightful commentaries and excerpts from Einstein’s original manuscript of the book provide context. 308 | NATURE | VOL 568 | 18 APRIL 2019 ©2019 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved. ©2019 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved. SPRING BOOKS COMMENT under physicist and Nobel laureate William to the intensely scrutinized narrative on the discovery “may turn out to be the greatest Henry Bragg, studying small mol ecules such double helix itself, he clarifies key issues. He development in the field of molecular genet- as tartaric acid. Moving to the University points out that the infamous conflict between ics in recent years”. And, on occasion, the of Leeds, UK, in 1928, Astbury probed the Wilkins and chemist Rosalind Franklin arose scope is too broad. The tragic figure of Nikolai structure of biological fibres such as hair. His from actions of John Randall, head of the Vavilov, the great Soviet plant geneticist of the colleague Florence Bell took the first X-ray biophysics unit at King’s College London. He early twentieth century who perished in the diffraction photographs of DNA, leading to implied to Franklin that she would take over Gulag, features prominently, but I am not sure the “pile of pennies” model (W. T. Astbury Wilkins’ work on DNA, yet gave Wilkins the how relevant his research is here. Yet pulling and F. O. Bell Nature 141, 747–748; 1938). impression she would be his assistant. Wilkins such figures into the limelight is partly what Her photos, plagued by technical limitations, conceded the DNA work to Franklin, and distinguishes Williams’s book from others. were fuzzy. But in 1951, Astbury’s lab pro- PhD student Raymond Gosling became her What of those others? Franklin Portugal duced a gem, by the rarely mentioned Elwyn assistant. It was Gosling who, under Franklin’s and Jack Cohen covered much the same Beighton. Using wet DNA fibres, he took supervision, took the iconic X-ray diffraction ground in the 1977 A Century of DNA, but images revealing the black-cross diffraction ‘Photograph 51’. Williams debunks the myth that now seems dated. James Schwartz’s In pattern characteristic of helical molecules. that Wilkins “stole” it; he clarifies how, before Pursuit of the Gene (2008) hardly touches They were never published, and Astbury did moving on to Birkbeck, University of London, on biochemistry, whereas Siddhartha not follow up on them; if he had, the story of Franklin gave her materials and data on DNA Mukherjee’s 2016 The Gene devotes little DNA might have been very different. to Gosling, to pass on to Wilkins to use as he space to the backstory of the double helix. Many other “lost heroes” emerge in Wil- wished. It was after this that Wilkins showed Isaac Newton wrote to natural philosopher liams’s telling. Martin Henry Dawson and Photograph 51 to James Watson, who, with Robert Hooke that he had seen further than James Lionel Alloway made important con- Crick, used it to uncover the double helix. others only by standing on the shoulders of tributions to Oswald Avery’s demonstration There are a few errors — inevitable in giants. Unravelling the Double Helix looks that DNA probably made up genes. H. F. W. a book of such scope. Williams writes, for beyond giants to the many researchers, now Taylor, C. J. Threlfall and Michael Creeth cru- instance, that biochemist Linus Pauling took half-forgotten, whose contributions paved the cially participated in J. Masson Gulland’s work a “surprisingly long time” to recognize that way for an icon of science. ■ showing that DNA solutions changed viscos- his proposed three-strand structure of DNA ity owing to the rupture of hydrogen bonds was wrong. In fact, at a meeting before the Jan Witkowski is the former director of between nucleotides. All is scrupulously publication of the true, two-strand structure the Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor documented in more than 50 pages of notes. (J. D. Watson and F. H. C. Crick Nature 171, Laboratory, New York. Although there is little Williams can add 737–738; 1953), Pauling remarked that the e-mail: [email protected] PARTICLE PHYSICS A singing, dancing Universe Jon Butterworth enjoys a celebration of mathematics-led theoretical physics. athematics is an immensely The Universe discoveries, over-reliance on mathematical powerful tool for understanding Speaks in elegance as a guide and a general drift into the laws of the Universe. That was Numbers: How what physicist and writer Jim Baggott, in Mdemonstrated dramatically, for instance, Modern Maths Farewell to Reality (2013), called “fairy- Reveals Nature’s by the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson, Deepest Secrets tale physics”, divorced from its empirical predicted in the 1960s. Yet an ongoing, GRAHAM FARMELO base. Notable critiques have come from often fervid debate over the direction of Faber & Faber (2019) theoretical physicists including Peter Woit, theoretical physics pivots on the relationship Lee Smolin and, more recently, Sabine between physics and maths — specifically, Hossenfelder (see A. Ananthaswamy Nature whether maths has become too dominant. 558, 186–187; 2018). Science writer Graham The worry — expressed by a number of monoculture too focused on a small clutch Farmelo clearly intends The Universe Speaks theorists and writers over several decades of concepts and approaches. Those include in Numbers as a riposte. — is that theoretical physics has become a string theory, overstated predictions of new Farmelo takes us on a tour through the Climate Change and the Health of Nations Economics for the Common Good Anthony J. McMichael OXFORD UNIV. PRESS (2019) Jean Tirole PRINCETON UNIV. PRESS (2019) In this posthumously published volume, French economist Jean Tirole’s deft study epidemiologist Anthony McMichael journeys (translated by Steven Rendell) questions his through the deep history of Earth’s changing discipline’s role in society.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kathleen Lonsdale
    Edited by KATHLEEN LONSDALE PRICE 3/6 Quakers Visit Russia Ediled by KATHLEEN LONSDALE Published by the Eash West Reialions Group of the Frle/idt' Peace Cotn/tti.dee, Friends House, Euston Road, London, N. IK t. First Edition July 1952 Reprinted October 1952 QUAKERS VISIT RUSSIA Edited by KATHLEEN LONSDALE Declaration to Charles II, 1660 "JKe utterly deny all outward wars and strife, and fightings with outward weapons, for any end, or under any pretence whatever; this is our testimony to the whole world. The Spirit of Christ by which we are guided is not changeable, so as once to command us from a thing as evil and again to move unto it; and we certainly know and testify to the world, that the Spirit of Christ, which leads us into all Truth, will never move us to fight and war against any man with outward weapons, neither for the Kingdom of Christ nor for the Kingdoms of this world.” Message of Goodwill to AM Men, 1956 (frwd In Engltih, French, German and Jtustton') "In face of deepening fear and mutual distrust throughout the world, the Society of Friends (Quakers) is moved to declare goodwill to all men everywhere. Friends appeal for the avoidance of words and deeds that increase suspicion and ill- feeling, for renewed efforts at understanding and for positive attempts to build a true peace. They are convinced that reconciliation is possible. They hope that this simple word, translated into many tongues, may itself help to create the new spirit in which the resources of the world will be diverted from war dike purposes and applied to the welfare of mankind.” Hl CONTENTS Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Singing, Dancing Universe Jon Butterworth Enjoys a Celebration of Mathematics-Led Theoretical Physics
    SPRING BOOKS COMMENT under physicist and Nobel laureate William to the intensely scrutinized narrative on the discovery “may turn out to be the greatest Henry Bragg, studying small mol ecules such double helix itself, he clarifies key issues. He development in the field of molecular genet- as tartaric acid. Moving to the University points out that the infamous conflict between ics in recent years”. And, on occasion, the of Leeds, UK, in 1928, Astbury probed the Wilkins and chemist Rosalind Franklin arose scope is too broad. The tragic figure of Nikolai structure of biological fibres such as hair. His from actions of John Randall, head of the Vavilov, the great Soviet plant geneticist of the colleague Florence Bell took the first X-ray biophysics unit at King’s College London. He early twentieth century who perished in the diffraction photographs of DNA, leading to implied to Franklin that she would take over Gulag, features prominently, but I am not sure the “pile of pennies” model (W. T. Astbury Wilkins’ work on DNA, yet gave Wilkins the how relevant his research is here. Yet pulling and F. O. Bell Nature 141, 747–748; 1938). impression she would be his assistant. Wilkins such figures into the limelight is partly what Her photos, plagued by technical limitations, conceded the DNA work to Franklin, and distinguishes Williams’s book from others. were fuzzy. But in 1951, Astbury’s lab pro- PhD student Raymond Gosling became her What of those others? Franklin Portugal duced a gem, by the rarely mentioned Elwyn assistant. It was Gosling who, under Franklin’s and Jack Cohen covered much the same Beighton.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Today - February 2003
    Physics Today - February 2003 Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix Although she made essential contributions toward elucidating the structure of DNA, Rosalind Franklin is known to many only as seen through the distorting lens of James Watson's book, The Double Helix. by Lynne Osman Elkin - California State University, Hayward In 1962, James Watson, then at Harvard University, and Cambridge University's Francis Crick stood next to Maurice Wilkins from King's College, London, to receive the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their "discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material." Watson and Crick could not have proposed their celebrated structure for DNA as early in 1953 as they did without access to experimental results obtained by King's College scientist Rosalind Franklin. Franklin had died of cancer in 1958 at age 37, and so was ineligible to share the honor. Her conspicuous absence from the awards ceremony--the dramatic culmination of the struggle to determine the structure of DNA--probably contributed to the neglect, for several decades, of Franklin's role in the DNA story. She most likely never knew how significantly her data influenced Watson and Crick's proposal. Franklin was born 25 July 1920 to Muriel Waley Franklin and merchant banker Ellis Franklin, both members of educated and socially conscious Jewish families. They were a close immediate family, prone to lively discussion and vigorous debates at which the politically liberal, logical, and determined Rosalind excelled: She would even argue with her assertive, conservative father. Early in life, Rosalind manifested the creativity and drive characteristic of the Franklin women, and some of the Waley women, who were expected to focus their education, talents, and skills on political, educational, and charitable forms of community service.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Microwave Engineering
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF MICROWAVE ENGINEERING S.N. SINHA PROFESSOR DEPT. OF ELECTRONICS & COMPUTER ENGINEERING IIT ROORKEE Multiple Name Symbol Multiple Name Symbol 100 hertz Hz 101 decahertz daHz 10–1 decihertz dHz 102 hectohertz hHz 10–2 centihertz cHz 103 kilohertz kHz 10–3 millihertz mHz 106 megahertz MHz 10–6 microhertz µHz 109 gigahertz GHz 10–9 nanohertz nHz 1012 terahertz THz 10–12 picohertz pHz 1015 petahertz PHz 10–15 femtohertz fHz 1018 exahertz EHz 10–18 attohertz aHz 1021 zettahertz ZHz 10–21 zeptohertz zHz 1024 yottahertz YHz 10–24 yoctohertz yHz • John Napier, born in 1550 • Developed the theory of John Napier logarithms, in order to eliminate the frustration of hand calculations of division, multiplication, squares, etc. • We use logarithms every day in microwaves when we refer to the decibel • The Neper, a unitless quantity for dealing with ratios, is named after John Napier Laurent Cassegrain • Not much is known about Laurent Cassegrain, a Catholic Priest in Chartre, France, who in 1672 reportedly submitted a manuscript on a new type of reflecting telescope that bears his name. • The Cassegrain antenna is an an adaptation of the telescope • Hans Christian Oersted, one of the leading scientists of the Hans Christian Oersted nineteenth century, played a crucial role in understanding electromagnetism • He showed that electricity and magnetism were related phenomena, a finding that laid the foundation for the theory of electromagnetism and for the research that later created such technologies as radio, television and fiber optics • The unit of magnetic field strength was named the Oersted in his honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Photograph 51, by Rosalind Franklin (1952) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Photograph 51, by Rosalind Franklin (1952) [1] By: Hernandez, Victoria Keywords: X-ray crystallography [2] DNA [3] DNA Helix [4] On 6 May 1952, at King´s College London in London, England, Rosalind Franklin photographed her fifty-first X-ray diffraction pattern of deoxyribosenucleic acid, or DNA. Photograph 51, or Photo 51, revealed information about DNA´s three-dimensional structure by displaying the way a beam of X-rays scattered off a pure fiber of DNA. Franklin took Photo 51 after scientists confirmed that DNA contained genes [5]. Maurice Wilkins, Franklin´s colleague showed James Watson [6] and Francis Crick [7] Photo 51 without Franklin´s knowledge. Watson and Crick used that image to develop their structural model of DNA. In 1962, after Franklin´s death, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine [8] for their findings about DNA. Franklin´s Photo 51 helped scientists learn more about the three-dimensional structure of DNA and enabled scientists to understand DNA´s role in heredity. X-ray crystallography, the technique Franklin used to produce Photo 51 of DNA, is a method scientists use to determine the three-dimensional structure of a crystal. Crystals are solids with regular, repeating units of atoms. Some biological macromolecules, such as DNA, can form fibers suitable for analysis using X-ray crystallography because their solid forms consist of atoms arranged in a regular pattern. Photo 51 used DNA fibers, DNA crystals first produced in the 1970s. To perform an X-ray crystallography, scientists mount a purified fiber or crystal in an X-ray tube.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to the Royal Institution of Great Britain: 1 HISTORY
    Guides to the Royal Institution of Great Britain: 1 HISTORY Theo James presenting a bouquet to HM The Queen on the occasion of her bicentenary visit, 7 December 1999. by Frank A.J.L. James The Director, Susan Greenfield, looks on Front page: Façade of the Royal Institution added in 1837. Watercolour by T.H. Shepherd or more than two hundred years the Royal Institution of Great The Royal Institution was founded at a meeting on 7 March 1799 at FBritain has been at the centre of scientific research and the the Soho Square house of the President of the Royal Society, Joseph popularisation of science in this country. Within its walls some of the Banks (1743-1820). A list of fifty-eight names was read of gentlemen major scientific discoveries of the last two centuries have been made. who had agreed to contribute fifty guineas each to be a Proprietor of Chemists and physicists - such as Humphry Davy, Michael Faraday, a new John Tyndall, James Dewar, Lord Rayleigh, William Henry Bragg, INSTITUTION FOR DIFFUSING THE KNOWLEDGE, AND FACILITATING Henry Dale, Eric Rideal, William Lawrence Bragg and George Porter THE GENERAL INTRODUCTION, OF USEFUL MECHANICAL - carried out much of their major research here. The technological INVENTIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS; AND FOR TEACHING, BY COURSES applications of some of this research has transformed the way we OF PHILOSOPHICAL LECTURES AND EXPERIMENTS, THE APPLICATION live. Furthermore, most of these scientists were first rate OF SCIENCE TO THE COMMON PURPOSES OF LIFE. communicators who were able to inspire their audiences with an appreciation of science.
    [Show full text]
  • “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate” (1953), by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate” (1953), by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling [1] By: Hernandez, Victoria Keywords: DNA [2] DNA Configuration [3] X-ray diffraction [4] DNA fibers [5] In April 1953, Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling, published "Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate," in the scientific journal Nature. The article contained Franklin and Gosling´s analysis of their X-ray diffraction pattern of thymonucleate or deoxyribonucleic acid, known as DNA. In the early 1950s, scientists confirmed that genes [6], the heritable factors that control how organisms develop, contained DNA. However, at the time scientists had not determined how DNA functioned or its three- dimensional structure. In their 1953 paper, Franklin and Gosling interpret X-ray diffraction patterns of DNA fibers that they collected, which show the scattering of X-rays from the fibers. The patterns provided information about the three-dimensional structure of the molecule. "Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate" shows the progress Franklin and Gosling made toward understanding the three-dimensional structure of DNA. Scientists worked to understand the three-dimensional structure of DNA since the 1930s. In the early to mid-1900s, scientists tried to determine the structures of many biological molecules, such as proteins, because the structure of those molecules indicated their function. By the 1930s, scientists had found that DNA consisted of a chain of building blocks called nucleotides. The nucleotides contained a ring-shaped structure called a sugar. On one side of the sugar, there is a phosphate group, consisting of phosphorus and oxygen and on the other side of the sugar, another ring-shaped structure called a base.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Beam X-Ray Photography of Crystals’ [10]
    Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 28, 2017 There ain’t nothing like a Dame: a commentary on rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Lonsdale (1947) ‘Divergent beam X-ray photography of Review crystals’ Cite this article: GlazerAM.2015Thereain’t A. M. Glazer nothinglikeaDame:acommentaryon Lonsdale (1947) ‘Divergent beam X-ray Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK photography of crystals’. Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A 373: 20140232. Prof. Dame Kathleen Lonsdale was one of the two first http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0232 female Fellows of the Royal Society, having originally been a student of that great British scientist and Nobel Laureate William Henry Bragg. She came to One contribution of 17 to a theme issue fame initially for her solution of the crystal structure ‘Celebrating 350 years of Philosophical of hexamethyl benzene, thus demonstrating that the Transactions: physical sciences papers’. benzene ring was flat, of considerable importance to organic chemistry, where it had been proposed before but without proof. This was at a time when the solution of crystal structures was in its infancy, Subject Areas: and in its day this work was considered a triumph. crystallography As a rare example then of a female physicist, Lonsdale became interested in various aspects of the Keywords: diffraction of X-rays, and in particular published an X-ray diffraction, divergent beam, important paper on a form of diffraction in which a Kossel patterns, diamond strongly divergent source was used rather than the usual highly collimated beam. The photographs thus obtained showed a series of arcs and circles, whose Author for correspondence: positions were so sensitive that they could be used to A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cavity Magnetron
    TRANSMISSION LINES THE JOURNAL OF THE DEFENCE ELECTRONICS HISTORY SOCIETY www.dehs.org.uk; ISSN 1362-3834 Volume 22 Number 3 Editor: Peter Butcher September 2017 DEHS Award Winner Major Anthony Glover with judging team – Peter Hill, Peter Butcher, Dick Green & Tony Jones (Photo: Dick Green) DEHS BEST PRESENTATION AWARD TO MESE STUDENT As has happened since 2007, we were invited to judge “Best presentation” at the MESE 31 project presentation event on 27th July. This year, there were four judges: Peter Butcher, Dick Green, Peter Hill and Tony Jones. There were eleven students from Australia, India, Italy and the UK. As usual, the projects ranged across radar, communications and electronic warfare systems, flavoured in some cases by laser data links, unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) and innovative materials. Many of the devices and systems could provide solutions to current and future defence requirements. We assigned scores against “audience rapport”, “audio visual use”, “clarity of subject”, “structure” and “end summary” criteria, in order to rank the presentations. We also considered how the speakers handled questions. This year, four presentations stood out and we had to reach consensus on a single winner very quickly. By some mysterious process, we agreed that the winner was Major Anthony Glover for his presentation on The use of low cost software defined radio systems to detect transient 4G mobile phone uplink transmissions in order to identify and classify the user activity. Dick Green then handed over a cheque for £200 to Major Glover and informed him that, as part of the award, he would be given honorary membership of DEHS for one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Signer's Gift ÂŒ Rudolf Signer And
    HISTORY 735 CHIMIA 2003, 57, No.11 Chimia 57 (2003) 735–740 © Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft ISSN 0009–4293 Signer’s Gift – Rudolf Signer and DNA Matthias Meili* Abstract: In early May 1950, Bern chemistry professor Rudolf Signer traveled to a meeting of the Faraday Society in London with a few grams of DNA to report on his success in the isolation of nucleic acids from calf thymus glands. After the meeting, he distributed his DNA samples to interested parties amongst those present. One of the recipients was Maurice Wilkins, who worked intensively with nucleic acids at King’s College in London. The outstanding quality of Signer’s DNA – unique at that time – enabled Maurice Wilkins’ colleague Rosalind Franklin to make the famous X-ray fiber diagrams that were a decisive pre-requisite for the discovery of the DNA double helix by James Watson and Francis Crick in the year 1953. Rudolf Signer, however, had already measured the physical characteristics of native DNA in the late thirties. In an oft-quot- ed work which he published in Nature in 1938, he described the thymonucleic acid as a long, thread-like molecule with a molecular weight of 500,000 to 1,000,000, in which the base rings lie in planes perpendicular to the long axis of the molecule. Signer’s achievements and contributions to DNA research have, however, been forgotten even in Switzerland. Keywords: Bern · DNA · Double helix · History · Signer, Rudolf · Switzerland 1. Signer’s Early DNA Years With the advancement of research, Helix’, pointed out that Rudolf Signer made however, insight into the nature of macro- important contributions in two places: “It 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 21.8 Commentary GA
    commentary Who said ‘helix’? Right and wrong in the story of how the structure of DNA was discovered. in Paris, the double-helical structure of DNA Watson Fuller might not have been discovered in London The celebrated model of DNA, put forward rather than in Cambridge. In fairness to in this journal in 1953 by James Watson and Randall, it was his energy, enterprise and Francis Crick, is compellingly simple, both vision in establishing the King’s laboratory in its form and its functional implications that allowed the experimental work that stim- (see www.nature.com/nature/dna50). At a ulated the discovery to take place. stroke it resolved the puzzle inherent in the The proposed double-helical model for X-ray diffraction photograph (see right) DNA is commonly described as the most sig- shown by Maurice Wilkins at a scientific nificant discovery of the second half of the meeting in Naples in the spring of 1951. twentieth century. Inevitably, the contribu- R.COURTESY G. GOSLING & M. H. F. WILKINS This was the pattern that so excited Jim tions of the principal protagonists have been Watson, who, in The Double Helix1, wrote: subjected to minute scrutiny.Crick,Franklin, “Maurice’s X-ray diffraction pattern of DNA Watson and Wilkins have all endured hostile was to the point. It was flicked on the screen criticism and snide disparagement of their near the end of his talk. Maurice’s dry Eng- roles in the story. Franklin has loyal, influen- lish form did not permit enthusiasm as he tial and persistent champions,and in particu- stated that the picture showed much more lar has had her reputation boosted, mainly at detail than previous pictures and could, in Wilkins’expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Winding Road to DNA Jan Witkowski Lauds an Account of the Half-Obscured Scientists Whose Work Helped to Reveal the Double Helix
    COMMENT SPRING BOOKS GENETICS Winding road to DNA Jan Witkowski lauds an account of the half-obscured scientists whose work helped to reveal the double helix. ong before the double helix was by botanists Hugo de discovered in 1953, biochemists vied Vries, Carl Correns to determine the enigmatic nature of and Erich Tschermak. LDNA. As early as 1914, chemist Walter Jones Williams adds imme- wrote (in his monograph Nucleic Acids) that diacy to the tale of pea the macromolecules “constitute what is possi- plants and heredity bly the best understood field of Physiological by starting with an Chemistry”. Cytologists, geneticists and even encounter between physicists, however, also co-authored the Mendel and C. W. Eich- story of DNA. ling, whose story was Unravelling the In Unravelling the Double Helix, medical Double Helix: The new to me. A German historian Gareth Williams illuminates key Lost Heroes of DNA seller of exotic flow- research in the 85 years between the dis- GARETH WILLIAMS ers, he visited Mendel coveries of nuclein, as it was first known, Weidenfeld & Nicolson in Brünn, Austria, in and the double helix. He refreshes a familiar (2019) 1878, looking for new chronicle by ending there, rather than using varieties. He later pub- it as a stepping stone to the Human Genome lished a verbatim account of his conversa- Project, epigenetics or gene editing. More- tion with Mendel — the only one in existence over, he eschews the ‘mountain top’ approach (C. W. Eichling J. Hered. 33, 243–246; 1942). — featuring individuals synonymous with The contributions of cytology contin- major advances.
    [Show full text]