Intro to the Bible: Session 4: the New Testament Cannon: Early Heresies 1) the Early Heresies Forced the Early Church to Define Core Beliefs and the Core Scriptures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intro to the Bible: Session 4: the New Testament Cannon: Early Heresies 1) the Early Heresies Forced the Early Church to Define Core Beliefs and the Core Scriptures Intro to the Bible: Session 4: The New Testament Cannon: Early Heresies 1) The early heresies forced the early church to define core beliefs and the core scriptures. 2) Marcionism a) Marcion was son of the Bishop of Sinope in Pontus, born c. A.D. 110, from wealthy parents. i) He is described as a ship owner. ii) Having fallen out with his father he travels to Rome, (1) Where, being a seafarer or ship owner and a great traveler, (a) He already may have been known (b) His wealth obtains him influence and position. b) Marcion was already a consecrated bishop. i) Probably an assistant or suffragan of his father at Sinope. ii) According to Tertullian he made the Roman community the gift of two hundred thousand sesterces soon after his arrival, a huge sum for those days, (1) The money was returned to him after his breach with the Church. c) Marcion is said to have asked the Roman presbyters the explanation of Matthew 9:16-17, i) Which he evidently wished to understand as expressing the incompatibility of the New Testament with the Old, ii) But they interpreted in an orthodox sense. d) His final breach with the Roman Church occurred in the autumn of 144, e) The Marcionites counted 115 years and 6 months from the time of Christ to the beginning of their sect. f) Justin Martyr in his first Apology (written about 150), describes Marcion's heresy as spread everywhere. i) These half a dozen years seem to many too short a time for such prodigious success and they believe that Marcion was active in Asia Minor long before he came to Rome. g) Date of death is not known. Marcionte churches existed until 800 A.D. 3) Marcionite Doctrine a) He wanted a Christianity untrammeled and undefiled by association with Judaism. b) The Old Testament was a scandal to the faithful i) A stumbling-block to the refined and intellectual gentiles (1) By its crudity and cruelty, and the Old Testament had to be set aside. c) Christianity was the New Covenant pure and simple. i) Abstract questions on the origin of evil or on the essence of the Godhead interested him little, d) The two great obstacles in his way he removed by drastic measures. i) He had to account for the existence of the Old Testament ii) Postulating a secondary deity, a “demiurgus” (1) Was god, in a sense, but not the supreme God; (2) he was just, rigidly just, he had his good qualities, (3) but he was not the good god, who was Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ. iii) The relation between these two gods troubled Marcion little e) Marcion had secondly to account for those passages in the New Testament, which referred to the Old. i) He cut out all texts that were contrary to his dogma; ii) He created his own New Testament (1) With only one gospel, a mutilation of St. Luke, (2) Apostolicon containing ten epistles of St. Paul. f) The mantle of St. Paul had fallen on the shoulders of Marcion in his struggle with the Judaizers. i) The early church of his day was nothing but the Judaizers of the previous century. g) The pure Pauline Gospel had become corrupted i) Marcion, said that even the pillar Apostles, Peter, James, and John had betrayed their trust. 1 ii) He loved to speak of "false apostles", and lets his hearers infer who they were. h) Once the Old Testament has been completely got rid of, i) Marcion has no further desire for change. ii) He makes his purely New Testament Church as like the Early Church as possible, (1) Consistent with his deep seated Puritanism. i) The first description of Marcion's doctrine dates from Justin Martyr: i) "With the help of the devil Marcion has in every country contributed to blasphemy and the refusal to acknowledge the Creator of all the world as God". He recognizes another god, who, because he is essentially greater (than the World maker or Demiurge) has done greater deeds than he. The supreme God is just and righteous. The good God is all love, the inferior god gives way to fierce anger. Though less than the good god, yet the just god, as world creator, has his independent sphere of activity. They are not opposed as though the good God interferes in favor of men, for he alone is all-wise and all-powerful and loves mercy more than punishment. All men are indeed created by the Demiurge, but by special choice he elected the Jewish people as his own and thus became the god of the Jews." j) His theological outlook is limited to the Bible, k) His struggle with the Early Church seems a battle over what is authentic scripture. i) The Old Testament is true enough, ii) Moses and the Prophets are messengers of the Demiurge, iii) The Jewish Messiah is sure to come and found a millennial kingdom for the Jews on earth, iv) But the Jewish messiah has nothing whatever to do with the Christ of God. (1) The Invisible, Indescribable, Good God (2) Formerly unknown to the creator as well as to his creatures, (a) Has revealed Himself in Christ. (3) Christ is indeed the Son of God, but he is also simply "God" without further qualification; l) To Marcion however Christ was God Manifest not God Incarnate. i) His Christology rejects the Infancy and childhood of Christ at all; ii) Marcion's Savior is what Tertullian mockingly says: (1) "Suddenly a Son, suddenly Sent, suddenly Christ!" iii) Marcion admitted no prophecy of the Coming of Christ whatever; (1) The Jewish prophets foretold a Jewish Messiah only, (a) This Messiah had not yet appeared. iv) Marcion used the story of the three angels, who ate, walked, and conversed with Abraham and yet had no real human body, v) Marcion would prefer to accept even a supposed birth rather than a real body. m) To Marcion matter and flesh are not essentially evil, i) But are contemptible things, a mere production of the Demiurge, ii) It was inconceivable that God should really have made them His own. n) Christ's life on earth was a continual contrast to the conduct of the Demiurge. i) Some of the contrasts are cleverly staged: (1) The Demiurge sent bears to devour children for childish merriment (Kings)-- Christ asked children come to Him and He blessed them; (2) The Demiurge in his law declared lepers unclean and banished them — but Christ touched and healed them. ii) Christ's supposed passion and death was the work of the Demiurge, (1) Who, in revenge for Christ's abolition of the Jewish law delivered Him up to hell. (2) But even in hell Christ overcame the Demiurge by preaching to the spirits in Limbo, (3) And by His resurrection He founded the true Kingdom of the Good God. 2 iii) Epiphanius says that Marcionites believed that in Limbo Christ brought salvation to Cain, Core, Dathan and Abiron, Esau, and the Gentiles, but left in damnation all Old Testament saints. iv) Marcion denied the resurrection of the body, (1) "For flesh and blood shall not inherit the Kingdom of God", v) Denied the second coming of Christ to judge the living and the dead, (1) The good God, being all goodness, does not punish those who reject Him; (2) He simply leaves them to the Demiurge, who will cast them into everlasting fire. o) How did Marcionites live? i) Rejection of marriage (1) He baptized only those who were not living in matrimony: virgins, widows, celibates, and eunuchs all others remained catechumens. ii) He used water in baptism, anointed his faithful with oil and gave milk and honey to the catechumens. iii) Epiphanius says they fasted on Saturday out of a spirit of opposition to the Jewish God, who made the Sabbath a day of rejoicing. p) Challenges to the church i) Marcion defined his own canon ii) It forced the church to come to grips with the Old Testament iii) And to define their own canon iv) He raised questions on the nature of God v) The nature of Christ (Human/Divine/Hybrid/Both?) vi) The nature of resurrection vii) Christian attitude to the world and the flesh. 4) Montanism a) Montanism was an early Christian movement of the late 2nd century, i) Referred to by the name of its founder, Montanus, ii) Originally known by its followers as the “New Prophecy. “ b) Originated in Phrygia, a province of Asia Minor, i) Flourished throughout the region, ii) Spread rapidly to other regions in the Roman Empire iii) It persisted in some isolated places into the 6th century. c) Although it came to be labeled a heresy, i) The movement held similar views about the basic tenets of Christian doctrine to those of the wider Christian Church. ii) It was a prophetic movement that called for a reliance on the spontaneity of the Holy Spirit and a more conservative personal ethic. iii) Parallels have been drawn between Montanism and modern day movements such as Pentecostalism and the charismatic movement d) History i) Montanus first began his prophetic activity, sometime between AD 135 and AD 177. ii) Montanus was a recent convert when he first began prophesying, iii) He believed he was a prophet of God and that the Paraclete spoke through him. iv) Montanus proclaimed the towns of Pepuza and Tymion in west-central Phrygia as the site of the New Jerusalem, making the larger Pepuza his headquarters. v) He had two female colleagues, Prisca and Maximilla, (1) Claimed the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Recommended publications
  • What Happened in the First Century -- Creation of New Testament Writings; Spread of Christianity; Rise of Persecutions
    What Happened in the First Century -- Creation of New Testament Writings; Spread of Christianity; Rise of Persecutions • The words and sayings of Jesus are collected and preserved. New Testament writings are completed. • A new generation of leaders succeeds the apostles. Nevertheless, expectation still runs high that the Lord may return at any time. The end must be close. • The Gospel taken through a great portion of the known world of the Roman empire and even to regions beyond. • New churches at first usually begin in Jewish synagogues around the empire and Christianity is seen at first as a part of Judaism. • The Church faces a major crisis in understanding itself as a universal faith and how it is to relate to its Jewish roots. • Christianity begins to emerge from its Jewish womb. A key transition takes place at the time of Jewish Revolt against Roman authority. In 70 AD Christians do not take part in the revolt and relocate to Pella in Jordan. • The Jews at Jamnia in 90 AD confirm the canon of the Hebrew Scriptures. The same books are recognized as authoritative by Christians. • Persecutions test the church. Jewish historian Josephus seems to express surprise that they are still in existence in his Antiquities in latter part of first century. • Key persecutions include Nero at Rome who blames Christians for a devastating fire that ravages the city in 64 AD He uses Christians as human torches to illumine his gardens. • Emperor Domitian demands to be worshiped as "Lord and God." During his reign the book of Revelation is written and believers cannot miss the reference when it proclaims Christ as the one worthy of our worship.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian & Christological Orthodoxy
    A Brief Overview of Christian Orthodoxy: Trinitarian and Christological Controversies By Charles Williams Last revised: August 9, 2009 The Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 A.D.) Concerning Against Text God the Father Gnosticism & We believe in one God Marcionism The Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, Valentinianism And of all things visible and invisible; God the Son And in one Lord Jesus Christ The only-begotten Son of God, Adoptionism Begotten of his Father before all time, God of God, Light of Light, Arianism Very God of very God, Begotten, not created, Being of one substance with the Father, By whom all things were made; Who for us and our salvation Came down from heaven, Adoptionism And was incarnate by the Holy Ghost Of the virgin Mary, Apollinarianism And was made man; Docetism And was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; And the third day he rose again According to the Scriptures, And ascended into heaven, And sits at the right hand of the Father; Modalism And he shall come again, with glory, To judge both the quick and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end. God the Holy Spirit Macedonianism And we believe in the Holy Ghost the Lord And Giver of Life Who proceeds from the Father [and the Son]*; Who with the Father and the Son Together is worshiped and glorified; Marcionism Who spake by the Prophets. The Church And we believe in one holy Catholic & Last Things And Apostolic Church; Donatism We acknowledge one Baptism For the remission of sins; Gnosticism And we look for the resurrection of the dead, And the life of the world to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecumenical Councils Preparing for Next Week (Disciple 6–Eucharist 1)
    January St. Dominic’s RCIA Program Disciple The Church: 15 History & Teaching 4 Goal • Having switched the Disciple 4 & 5 weeks, we looks at an overview of the Sacraments last week (Disciple 5), and explored the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation. These Sacraments are two of the three that initiate us into the Church community, and into Christ’s body and mission. This week we’ll continue to unpack the meaning of Church by looking broadly at its history one the last 2000 years. We’ll also explore it’s role as Teacher. How does the Church function in and through history? How does God walk with the Church through it all? Agenda • Welcome/Housekeeping (10) • Questions & Answers • Introduction to the Rosary (15) Discussion (15): • If the Church is The Body of Christ, what does this mean for Christ’s presence in the world through history and in the world today? • What do I admire about the Catholic Church’s activity in history? Does any part of the Church’s activity in history disturb or upset me? • How do I (might I) listen to what the Church has to say today? What is my approach/attitude to the Church as “Teacher”? • Presentation: The Church: History (35) • Break (10) • Presentation: The Church: Teaching & Belief (30) • Discussion (time permitting): • What is special to this moment in history? • What is the Good News of Christ & the Church that speaks to this moment in history? • How can the body of Christ proclaim & witness the Gospel and walk with others today? Housekeeping Notes • Rite of Acceptance: February 10th at the 11:30am and 5:30 Masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 500 AD – 1000 AD
    Lessons • Introduction and Overview • Spread of Christianity • Church and State – Persecution and Adoption • Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy Part I (Apologists, Heresies, and Canon) • Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy Part II (the Ecumenical Councils) 1 Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy The Apologists • Focus is defending Christianity externally – to Pagans and Jews, not others claiming Christianity • Some effort spent refuting base rumors about Christian behavior (e.g., cannibalism, incest, unpatriotic, etc.) discussed in previous material • Other adversaries included cultured pagans who made some effort to learn about Christianity and looked at Christians as intellectually inferior, lower class people ➢ Why is your omnipotent God such a busybody in individual affairs? ➢ If our gods are false, why not worship them? Are you afraid they are true? ➢ How can Jesus be good? He was a prisoner condemned by legitimate Roman authorities. ➢ Why would God visit earth – doesn’t he know everything? Can’t he deal with evil without doing it personally? ➢ Why be willing to leave the certainty of this life for the uncertainty of a resurrection? ➢ At the final resurrection, what happens to bodies burned or otherwise destroyed? I Peter 3:15 - “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:” 2 Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy The Apologists Apologist Timeframe Works / Focus Justin 100-165 2 Apologies – “Christian Philosophy” – the connection between Christianity and classical philosophy (e.g., Martyr supreme being, life beyond physical death, etc.). John 1:1, 14 Word = Logos = [universal] Reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcion and the Corruption of Paul's Gospel
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Judith M. Lieu Marcion and the Corruption of Paul’s Gospel Abstract: That Marcion’s authoritative texts were a form of the canonical Gospel of Luke and a Pauline corpus is well established, yet the relationship between these is far less certain. Although it is widely assumed that Marcion identified or authorised his gospel through a reading of Paul’s defence of his gospel in Gal 1–2, this relies heavily on Tertullian who is driven by his own rhetoric and agenda. Tracing the different defences by Irenaeus and Tertullian of the authority of the gospel and of conflict between Paul and Peter alerts us to the complex negotiations involved in the textualization of the early Christian message, and in the attempts to hold together the Pauline revolution and the remembering of Jesus traditions. Marcion represents a different stage in this process, and although we can reconstruct for him a narrative, it is one which is fragmentary and remains allusive. Contemporary attempts to get beyond the rhetoric and special pleading must always be sensitive to the ideological framing that has accompanied narratives of the past from the start. Keywords: Marcion, gospel, Paul, Irenaeus, Tertullian Judith M. Lieu: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Divinity, West Road, Cambridge CB3 9BS, United Kingdom, e-mail: [email protected] φασὶν δ᾽ὡς ἄρα τοῦ κατ᾽αὐτὸν εὐαγγελίου µνηµονεύειν ὁ Παῦλος εἴωθεν ὁπηνίκα ὡς περὶ ἰδίου τινὸς εὐαγγελίου γράφων ἔλεγεν “κατὰ τὸ εὐαγγέλιόν
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official
    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Future Views of the Past: Models of the Development
    Andrews University Seminary Student Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1-15. Copyright © 2015 John W. Reeve. FUTURE VIEWS OF THE PAST: MODELS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLY CHURCH JOHN W. REEVE Assistant Professor of Church History [email protected] Abstract Models of historiography often drive the theological understanding of persons and periods in Christian history. This article evaluates eight different models of the early church period and then suggests a model that is appropriate for use in a Seventh-day Adventist Seminary. The first three models evaluated are general views of the early church by Irenaeus of Lyon, Walter Bauer and Martin Luther. Models four through eight are views found within Seventh-day Adventism, though some of them are not unique to Adventism. The ninth model, proposed by the author, is expressed colloquially for the sake of simplicity and memorability: The good guys are the bad guys/The bad guys are the good guys. The lessons of history must be learned from actual people with their successes and failures. There was no golden age when exemplars thought and acted in perfect virtue. History was lived by very human people. Keywords: tradition, orthodoxy, heresy, model. Introduction Religious training has always been a problematic area of humanities education, wishing to be, at the same time, both specific to the values and needs of a particular confession or movement as well as being objective and academic. This paper is directed toward establishing a model for understanding the development of Christianity in the early church for use within Seventh-day Adventist seminary training, but has implications for all teaching of the early church.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiography Early Church History
    HISTORIOGRAPHY AND EARLY CHURCH HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS Historiography Or Preliminary Issues......................................................... 4 Texts ..................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 Definition.............................................................................................................. 5 Necessity............................................................................................................... 5 What Is Church History?............................................................................. 6 What Is The Biblical Philosophy Of History? ............................................ 7 The Doctrine Of God............................................................................................ 7 The Doctrine Of Creation..................................................................................... 8 The Doctrine Of Predestination............................................................................ 8 Why Study Church History? ....................................................................... 9 The Faithfulness Of God .................................................................................... 10 Truth And Experience ........................................................................................ 10 Truth And Tradition ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Albigensian Heresy and the Gnostic Tradition
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1983 The Albigensian Heresy and the Gnostic Tradition John Stine Penman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Medieval History Commons Recommended Citation Penman, John Stine, "The Albigensian Heresy and the Gnostic Tradition" (1983). Master's Theses. 1621. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1621 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ALBIGENSIAN HERESY AND THE GNOSTIC TRADITION by John Stine Penman A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of'M aster of Arts Medieval Studies Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1983 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE ALBIGENSIAN HERESY AND THE GNOSTIC TRADITION John Stine Penman, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1983 That the Albigensian heresy represents a resurgence of early Christian Gnosticism is the thesis of this work. The study defines Gnosticism in terms of its pattern of prevalent characteristics and traces the course of Gnosticism and its emergence as the Albigensianism of the Middle Ages. Using the finding of Hans Soderberg's La Religion des Cathares: Etudes, sur le gnosticisme de la basse antiquite et du moyen Sge. as a point of departure through the analysis of documents discovered since 1949, the study shows that Gnosticism and the Albigensian heresy represent a continued tradition of religious expression as a recognizable alternative to the accepted and established institutions of Christianity in the Western world.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the God of the Old Testament the Same As the God of the New Testament? ▪ We Have Questions and We Hear Questions –
    Marcionism September 15,2019 These Are a Few of My Favorite… Heresies! ▪ Clarification: I do NOT like heresies! …But I love the way they forced the Church to bring clarity to key issues. ▪ Less about Heresies and more about how we got the Bible we have and how the church has dealt with the question of how the New Testament relates to the Old. Heresy or heretic: “Someone who has compromised an essential doctrine and lost sight of who God really is, usually by oversimplification. Literally heresy means ‘choice’ – that is, a choice to deviate from traditional teaching in favor of one’s own insight.” ▪ “A legitimate heresy has threatened to confuse ordinary believers simply because of the speculations of an influential thinker.” ▪ “They weren’t heretics because they asked the questions. It is the answers that they gave that are wrong. They went too far by trying to make the Christian faith more compatible with ideas that they already found appealing, especially those of pagan Greek philosophy.” ▪ Behold, there is nothing new under the sun! Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. C. S. Lewis warns, if we remain ignorant of the errors and triumphs of our history, we run the risk of what he calls “chronological snobbery,” the arrogant assumption that the values and beliefs of our own time have surpassed all that came before. …A man who has lived in many places is not likely to be deceived by the local errors of his native village; the scholar has lived in many times and is therefore in some degree immune from the great cataract of nonsense that pours from the press and the microphone of his own age.” Acts 15:1-2 Some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: “Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.” 2 This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christological Heresies
    Early Christological Heresies Introduction When a Bible student reads some of the history of the early church regarding the theological debates about the Trinity and the natures of Christ, he can be easily overwhelmed with detail and thrown into complete confusion. Doctrines such as Apollinarianism or Monothelitism just flummox him. Sadly some of the books and dictionary articles on these subjects are technical, full of jargon and confusing. Indeed, it is not easy even for students who have studied this for some time. Well, this paper is written to try to make this complex web of theology a little bit easier to understand. The reason for this difficulty is the complexity of the wonderful person of Christ. The theological statements are so difficult because they are trying to evaluate the depths and glory of something that is too high for us to grasp; we can only seek to encapsulate this glory in human terms as best as we can. Consequently, as a clearer doctrinal statement arose, heretics quickly appeared to countermand that because they felt that the former teaching denied or contradicted something else about Christ; thus the church went back and forth in a pendulum effect either overstating Christ’s deity or his humanity (see Appendix One). Another factor is that in post-apostolic early church there was no single orthodox party. As new ideas arose, there would be a number of parties vying for support. For instance, as Docetism became a threat, some Christians confronted it with a type of Adoptionist doctrine, others with more Biblical teachings; but at the same time there were people with Modalistic theology.
    [Show full text]