DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Spanish Government on the Visit to Spain Carried out by The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Spanish Government on the Visit to Spain Carried out by The CPT/Inf (96) 9 [Part 2] Report to the Spanish Government on the visit to Spain carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 10 to 22 April 1994 The Spanish Government has agreed the publication of this report and of its response. The latter is set out in document CPT/Inf (96) 10. Strasbourg, 5 March 1996 Report to the Spanish Government on the visit to Spain carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 10 to 22 April 1994 - 3 - CONTENTS Page Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ..................................................................................7 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................9 A. Preliminary remarks ................................................................................................................9 B. Composition of the delegation and establishments visited....................................................9 C. Consultations held by the delegation.....................................................................................11 D. Co-operation between the CPT and the Spanish authorities..............................................12 E. Recourse to Article 8 (5) of the Convention..........................................................................13 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................15 A. Law enforcement agencies .....................................................................................................15 1. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................15 2. Material conditions of detention......................................................................................19 a. introduction ............................................................................................................19 b. Civil Guard establishments ....................................................................................19 c. National Police establishments ..............................................................................22 d. Basque Autonomous Police (Ertzaintza) establishments.......................................24 e. other places of detention ........................................................................................25 f. supplementary remarks ..........................................................................................26 3. Safeguards against the ill-treatment of detained persons ................................................27 a. notification of custody ...........................................................................................27 b. access to a lawyer...................................................................................................29 c. access to a doctor ...................................................................................................29 d. conduct of interrogations..........................................................................................30 e. supervision of the situation of detained persons by the competent judicial authority or public prosecutor ......................................31 f. custody records ......................................................................................................32 g. Organic Law No. 1/1992 on the protection of people's security............................33 - 4 - B. Places of detention for foreigners ..........................................................................................34 1. Detention Centre for foreigners at Moratalaz..................................................................34 2. Detention Centre for foreigners at Barcelona..................................................................34 3. Special Transit Area, Barajas Airport, Madrid................................................................36 4. Supplementary remarks...................................................................................................37 C. Prisons......................................................................................................................................38 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................38 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................39 3. Treatment of prisoners considered as "extremely dangerous" or as "unadapted to an ordinary prison regime" ..............................................................41 4. Conditions of detention in the prisons visited .................................................................43 a. material conditions and activities...........................................................................43 b. contact with the outside world ...............................................................................49 c. execution of sentences in the prisoners' original social environment ....................50 5. Health-care services.........................................................................................................51 a. introduction ............................................................................................................51 b. health-care services in the establishments visited..................................................51 i. staff and facilities .........................................................................................51 ii. medical screening on reception....................................................................53 iii. medical care provided to prisoners..............................................................54 iv. issues relating to HIV ...................................................................................56 v. access to a fully-equipped hospital service ..................................................57 c. the General Penitentiary Hospital ..........................................................................58 d. further remarks.......................................................................................................60 6. Other issues.....................................................................................................................61 a. staff resources and training ....................................................................................61 b. the supervisory judge .............................................................................................62 - 5 - D. Detention Centres for Minors................................................................................................63 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................63 2. Material conditions and activities....................................................................................63 3. Discipline.........................................................................................................................65 4. Medical issues.................................................................................................................65 E. Psychiatric institutions...........................................................................................................67 III. RECAPITULATION AND CONCLUSIONS......................................................................69 A. Law enforcement agencies .....................................................................................................69 B. Places of detention for foreigners ..........................................................................................71 C. Prisons......................................................................................................................................71 D. Detention Centres for Minors................................................................................................73 E. Psychiatric Institutions...........................................................................................................73 F. Action on the CPT's recommendations, comments and requests for information...........74 APPENDIX I: SUMMARY OF THE CPT'S RECOMMENDATIONS, COMMENTS AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION .......................................................75 APPENDIX II: LIST OF THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS WITH WHICH THE DELEGATION HELD CONSULTATIONS.............................................89 - 7 - Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report Strasbourg, 15 December 1994 Dear Mr Borrego, In pursuance of Article 10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, I have the honour to enclose herewith the report to the Government of Spain drawn up by the European Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) after its visit to Spain from 10 to 22 April 1994. The report was adopted by the CPT at its twenty-third meeting, held from 28 November to 2 December 1994. I would draw your attention in particular to paragraphs 33, 43 and 175 of the report, in which the CPT requests that certain information be provided within three months, as well as to paragraph 229, in which the Committee requests the Spanish
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter-Organizational Coordination: How Police Forces
    INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL COORDINATION: HOW POLICE FORCES RELATE TO POLITICAL PRINCIPALS, JUDICIAL BODIES, AND OTHER POLICE FORCES Mila Gascó-Hernández Ángel Saz-Carranza Institute of Public Governance and Management ESADE Barcelona, Spain [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract This exploratory paper aims at understanding how several police forces across Europe manage their relationships with three of the main actors they must coordinate with: politicians, judges and prosecutors, and other police forces. The paper particularly refers to the specific case of two Spanish police forces: the Catalan police force and the Madrid local police force. Our main research question is exploratory in nature: how do police forces relate to other security forces and to political and judicial principals? Methodologically, the paper is part of a wider FP7 research, COMPOSITE (Comparative Police Studies in the European Union). Keywords Inter-organizational coordination, police forces, stakeholders, Weberian politics- administration separation, principal-agent theory INTRODUCTION Today’s complex world increases “wicked” problems (Rittel & Webber, 1973) and the need for organizational mechanisms combining dispersed power with unification (Agranoff & McGuire, 2001). Security issues are no exception. Terrorism, organized crime, and drug trafficking, to name a few, are ever more complex phenomena covering many different kinds of actors and territories. These social problems require modern police forces capable of coordinating and collaborating with other police bodies but, also, with such as the political principal, other governmental departments, and judicial bodies. Several theoretical streams are useful to approach coordination activities in such heterogeneous and fragmented context: network management (Agranoff & McGuire, 2001; Bouckaert, Peters & Verhoest, 2010), and agency theory (Verhoest et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in Federal States
    NEPAL STEPSTONES PROJECTS Policing in Federal States Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler (Eds.) Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assis- tance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security ser- vices and the military. 2011 Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva, 2011 Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler, eds., Policing in Federal States, Nepal Stepstones Projects Series # 2 (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011). Nepal Stepstones Projects Series no. 2 © Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011 Executive publisher: Procon Ltd., <www.procon.bg> Cover design: Angel Nedelchev ISBN 978-92-9222-149-2 PREFACE In this book we will be looking at specimens of federative police or- ganisations. As can be expected, the federative organisation of such states as Germany, Switzerland, the USA, India and Russia will be reflected in their police organisation, though the extremely decentralised approach of Switzerland with hardly any central man- agement structures can hardly serve as a paradigm of ‘the’ federal police organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Spanish Government on the Visit To
    CPT/Inf (2011) 11 Report to the Spanish Government on the visit to Spain carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 19 September to 1 October 2007 The Spanish Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2011) 12. Strasbourg, 25 March 2011 - 3 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ........................................................................ 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 7 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation........................................................... 7 B. Establishments visited.......................................................................................................... 8 C. Consultations held by the delegation................................................................................. 10 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the authorities of Spain ............................................ 10 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention ..................... 12 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ............................ 13 A. Law enforcement agencies................................................................................................. 13 1. Preliminary remarks...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Human Rights Practices Report -- Spain Page 1 of 11
    1998 Human Rights Practices Report -- Spain Page 1 of 11 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Spain Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1998 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, February 26, 1999. SPAIN Spain is a democracy with a constitutional monarch. The Parliament consists of two chambers, the Congress of Deputies and the Senate. Jose Maria Aznar of the Popular Party was elected President in 1996. The Government respects the constitutional provisions for an independent judiciary in practice. Spain has three levels of security forces. The National Police are responsible for nationwide investigations, security in urban areas, traffic control, and hostage rescue. The Civil Guard polices rural areas and controls borders and highways. Autonomous police forces have taken over many of the duties of the Civil Guard in Galicia, Catalonia, and the Basque Country. The security forces are under the effective control of the Government. The security forces also maintain anticorruption units. Some members of the security forces committed human rights abuses. The economy is market based, with primary reliance on private initiative, although a number of public sector enterprises remain in key areas. The economy grew at a 3.9 percent annual rate in the second quarter, and overall growth for the year was expected to be around 3.8 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • SPAIN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Kingdom of Spain Is A
    SPAIN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingdom of Spain is a parliamentary democracy headed by a constitutional monarch. The country has a bicameral parliament, the General Courts or National Assembly, consisting of the Congress of Deputies (lower house) and the Senate (upper house). The head of the largest political party or coalition usually was named to head the government as president of the Council of Ministers, the equivalent of prime minister. National elections held on November 20 were considered free and fair. Security forces reported to civilian authorities. The most significant human rights problems during the year included limited access to asylum for undocumented migrants and credible reports that security forces were given arrest quotas for immigrants and used ethnic and racial profiling to achieve this goal. Gender-based violence against women and girls was also a problem. Other problems included some reports that security forces abused suspects and used excessive force against demonstrators and prison overcrowding. Authorities at times delayed access by persons under arrest to legal assistance or to arraignment before a judge. Identification controls by security forces based on ethnic and racial classifications took place. Government corruption occurred, particularly at the provincial and municipal levels. Trafficking in persons and social discrimination against Muslims and other minorities were reported. Jewish groups reported isolated acts of vandalism and anti-Semitism. The government generally took steps to prosecute officials, both in the security services and elsewhere in the government, who committed abuses. There were no reports of impunity. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings.
    [Show full text]
  • Parti Response of the Spanish Government to the Report
    PARTI RESPONSE OF THE SPANISH GOVERNMENT TO THE REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT (CPT) ON ITS VISIT TO SPAIN FROM 10 TO 22 APRIL 1994 .e; 7 ~ Ministerio de Justicia e Interior Dirección General de Codificación \' Cooperación Juridica Inlernacional RESPONSE OF THE GOVERNMENT CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF SPAIN TO THE REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND INHUMAN OR DEGRADING PUNlSHMENT OR TREATMENT AFTER ITS SECOND PERIODIC VISIT TO SPAIN. December 1995 9 Ministerio de Justicia e Interior Dirección General de Codificación yCooperación Juridica Internacional RESPONSE TO THE CPT PERIODIC REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PRESENTATION VOLUME I.- General response made by the Spanish Central authority. FIRST PART.- INFORMATION FROM THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ON TORTURE ANO OTHER FORMS OF ILL-TREATMENT. I. - CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AND SENTENCES GIVEN IN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION. A) IN THE "TRIBUNALES SUPERIORES DE JUSTICIA" B) IN THE "AUDIENCIAS PROVINCIALES" 11.- GUARANTEES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND PUNISHMENT OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES DERIVED FROM COMPLAINTS ABOUT ILL­ TREATMENT RECEIVED WHILST IN CUSTODY IN ESTABLISHMENTS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. 111.- POSSIBLE APPLICATION TO DETAINED PERSONS OF THE PROTOCOL ON TRANSFERS APPLIED BY THE PENITENTIARY ADMINISTRATION. IV. - TRANSFER OF PRISONERS BETWEEN THE CANARY ISLANDS AND MAINLAND SPAIN. 10 Ministerio de Justicia e Interior Dirección General de Codificación y Cooperación luridica Internacional SECOND PART: MATERIAL CONDITIONS OF DETENTION 1.- SPEC1F1C RECOMMENOAT10NS ABOUT OETENT10N CENTRES 1.- Civil Guard establishments. 2.- National Police establishments. 3.- Basque Autonomous Police (Ertzaintza) establishments. 4.- Municipal detention centres. Municipal Police Headquarters in Bilbao.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in Federal Countries Introduction
    Policing in Federal Countries Introduction This paper describes the role and place of policing in federal countries. It illustrates different models of policing in the following countries: Brazil, Canada, India, Spain and the United States. A brief outline of divisions of power of policing responsibilities between local, regional and national governments are described. The paper discusses financial arrangements between the different levels of governments and touches on recruitment issues as well. As only a broad outline of each country is given, the paper does not offer the complexities involved in federal policing model. However, it does provide useful frameworks to further discussions on policing in countries pursuing a federal model. December 2002 Page 1 Policing in Federal Countries Brazil Brazil has a federal system of government and of administration of the criminal justice system. Article 144 of the 1988 constitution states that the public safety function is to be exercised through the following agencies: on a national level, the Federal Police (Polícia Federal--PF), the Federal Highway Police, and the Federal Railroad Police; and on a state level, the Civil Police (Polícia Civil--PC), the Military Police, and military fire departments. In practice the Federal Railroad Police are nonexistent, and federal highways are under Federal Police control. State highways and traffic police are under state Military Police control. The Federal Police force is very small and plays only a minor role in maintaining internal security. Police forces
    [Show full text]
  • Bias and Externalities in Police/Community Interaction Tools the Catalan Case
    This app is not for you: Bias and externalities in police/community interaction tools The Catalan case Eticas Research and Consulting March, 2020 Research team Direction: Gemma Galdon Clavell and Mariano Martín Zamorano. Researchers: Alejandro Vélez, Miguel Valbuena, Sara Suárez Gonzalo. Acknowledgements This document and the research behind it would not have been possible without the support of the Project Board; Angel Parraga Gonzalez (Hospitalet Local Police), Iván Martínez (Valencia Local Police) and Santi Costa (Mossos d’Esquadra). We also want to thank the Col·legi de Criminòlegs de ​ Catalunya, the police officers taking part in fieldwork and all the organizations that took part in the ​ fieldwork activities, including SOS Racisme, Fundació Arrels, CEAR-CCAR, Casal dels Infants, Associació de Veïns del Raval, Eix Comercial del Raval, ProHabitatge and also thanks to Iridia to participate in the presentation of this study. 2 Bias and externalities in police/community interaction tools. The Catalan case List of acronyms ❏ CSOs: Civil Society Organizations ❏ GDPR: General Data Protection Regulation ❏ ICT: Information and Communications Technology ❏ PG-ME: Policia de la Generalitat- Mossos d’Esquadra ❏ NGO: Non-governmental Organizations ❏ MET: Metropolitan Police ❏ GDP: Gross Domestic Product ❏ SNS: Social Network Sites ❏ CCTV: Closed-Circuit Television ❏ LEA: Law Enforcement Agency ❏ MENAS: Unaccompanied Foreign Minors (in Spanish) ​ ​ 3 Bias and externalities in police/community interaction tools. The Catalan case Index 1. Introduction 5 2. Methodology 7 2.1 Methodological approach 7 2.2 Data collection tools and target groups 8 Short scale survey with local police 8 Interviews with relevant stakeholders 10 Focus groups with police and social organizations 10 Digital ethnography 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • General Information About Bilbao
    GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT BILBAO The XVth Spanish Biometric Conference and the Vth Ibero-American Biometric Meeting will take place in Bilbao on September 22-25, 2015 at Bizkaia Aretoa Building. Abandoibarra Avenue, 3. 48009 Bilbao www.ehu.eus /bizkaia-aretoa How to get to Bilbao AIRPORT Bilbao Airport lies 12 kilometers away from the city, in Loiu district. The Vizcayan capital and its airport are linked by highway, which makes the journey quick and easy. Get there: By Bus : A3247 Bilbao-Aeropuerto/Aireportua Bilbao - Airport 5:25 – 21:55, every 30´ Airport - Bilbao 6:15 – 00:00, every 30´ Bus occasional ticket: 1,45 € By Taxi: Radio Taxi Femade : +34 944 80 09 09 The taxi fare from the Airport to the Bilbao city center could be up to 25€ BUS Bilbao's main bus station is the bus terminal Termibus, next to the exchange station San Mames. Termibus can be accessed from San Mames Bilbao Underground station, Bilbao Tramway (EuskoTran) and Renfe Short Distance lines. Bilbao central train station, Termibus Gurtubay, 1, 48013 Bilbao Phone number: +34 94 439 50 77 www.termibus.es TRAIN Two kinds of trains depart from Bilbao: Short and Long Distance Trains: Bilbao central train station, Abando Plaza Circular, 2, 48008 Bilbao www.renfe.com Climate Bilbao has a humid oceanic climate, with predominantly West winds, that make temperatures milder and favour temperate weather throughout the year. Given its proximity to the sea, the climate is mild and without extreme temperature changes between the seasons: with an average temperature 8ºC in winter and 20ºC in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • About Polish Police
    ABOUT POLISH POLICE https://info.policja.pl/ine/evens/204495,Commander-in-Chief-of-the-Police-with-a-visit-to-the-Embassy-of-the-Republic-of-.htm l 2021-09-25, 02:15 COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE POLICE WITH A VISIT TO THE EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND IN SPAIN On June 10, 2021 the Embassy of the Republic of Poland in Madrid hosted a truly unique event - the solemn celebration of the Polish Police Day, which was attended not only by Commander- in-Chief of the Police, General Jaroslaw Szymczyk, but also Ambassador of the Republic of Poland in Madrid, Mrs. Marzenna Adamczyk, and a number of distinguished guests, including the Commanders of the Spanish Police Force. The celebration of Police Day at the Embassy of the Republic of Poland in Madrid received a special setting, both due to the status of the guests and the symbolic references to the history of the Polish Police. The attendees included the executives of thePolicia Nacional (National Police) and theGuardia Civil (Civil Guard), as well as thePolicia Municipal (Municipal Police) and thePolicía Local de Alcalá de Henares(Local Police of Alcala de Henares), representatives from Ertzaintza (Basque Police), Mossos d'Escquadra, (Castilian Police) and Police Foral (from Navarre). The event was also attended by liaison officers of other countries accredited in Spain, representatives of the Polish consulates in Spain and the Embassy staff. The ceremony held on such a large scale is a result of strengthening bilateral cooperation between the Polish and Spanish police forces in the field of fight against organized crime and security of mass events.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Spanish Government on the Visit to Spain Carried out by The
    CPT/Inf (2011) 11 Report to the Spanish Government on the visit to Spain carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 19 September to 1 October 2007 The Spanish Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2011) 12. Strasbourg, 25 March 2011 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................8 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the authorities of Spain.................................................8 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................11 A. Law enforcement agencies......................................................................................................11 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Police Systems
    Federalism and Police Systems Sebastian Roché COGINTA Federalism and Police Systems Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assis- tance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security ser- vices and the military. Federalism and Police Systems Geneva, 2011 Federalism and Police Systems (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011). © Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011 Executive Publisher: Procon Ltd., <www.procon.bg> Cover Design: Angel Nedelchev ISBN 978-92-9222-161-4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The overall objective of this study is to equip the public officials and the Nepalese Police Force with the tools that will allow them to identify the implications of a shift to federalism when it comes to the policing forces and to make the right decision when designing their police system. The report outlines the core concepts necessary to understand policing in federal states including legal and organizational aspects. Such a clarification is essential so that the authorities can have a clear vision of what the implementation of various federal scenarios would entail for their country.
    [Show full text]