Members Directory 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
London Paramount Entertainment Resort
London Paramount Entertainment Resort Public Consultation: Your Feedback from Stage Two London Resort Company Holdings January 2015 London Paramount Entertainment Resort Your Feedback from Stage Two January 2015 London Paramount Entertainment Resort Public Consultation: Your Feedback from Stage Two London Resort Company Holdings London Paramount Entertainment Resort Your Feedback from Stage Two Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview of Stage Two of the Consultation ................................................................................... 4 Publicity ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Media .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Online ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Attendance ................................................................................................................................. 7 Analysis of feedback ....................................................................................................................... 9 Conclusion -
Kent Rail Strategy 2021
Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Public Consultation Report January 2021 Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Consultation Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Consultation process................................................................................................................ 4 3. Consultation responses ............................................................................................................ 8 4. Kent Rail Strategy ambitions .................................................................................................. 10 5. Rail policy .............................................................................................................................. 15 6. Fares policy ........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Rail infrastructure enhancements ........................................................................................... 25 8. Rolling stock improvements ................................................................................................... 29 9. Passenger services ................................................................................................................ 33 10. Community Rail Partnerships (CRPs) ................................................................................. 37 11. Rail freight provision .......................................................................................................... -
Annual Report 2015 Report Annual Plc Lakehouse
Lakehouse plc Annual Report 2015 Annual Report 2015 The Lakehouse Way Who Lakehouse is an asset and energy support we are services group, focused on customers and their communities. We make a difference to people’s lives by constructing, improving, maintaining and providing services to homes, schools, public and commercial buildings. Lakehouse was founded in 1988 and we have grown consistently since, achieving revenue of £340.2m in 2014/15. With our headquarters in Romford, Essex, we employ more than 2,400 people through 35 offices across the UK. Lakehouse listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange in March 2015. Strategic Report Governance Overview 43 Executive Chairman’s introduction IFC Who we are to Corporate Governance Why invest in Lakehouse? 44 Board of Directors About Lakehouse 46 Corporate Governance Report 01 Our manifesto 56 Directors’ Remuneration Report 01 Financial highlights 69 Directors’ Report 02 The Lakehouse Way 71 Directors’ responsibilities Strategic review Financial statements E 12 xecutive Chairman’s Statement 72 Independent Auditor’s Report to I 14 nterview with Sean Birrane, CEO the members of Lakehouse plc 17 Company snapshot 77 Consolidated statement of M 18 arket overview comprehensive income B 20 usiness model 78 Consolidated statement of O 22 ur strategy financial position K 24 ey performance indicators 79 Consolidated statement of changes C 26 hief Executive Officers’ in equity Divisional review 80 Consolidated statement of cash flows 30 Principal risks and uncertainties 81 Notes to the consolidated -
Lighthouse Club News
ISSUE 198 SPRING 2010 Lighthouse Club News THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY CHARITY’S NEWSLETTER Founder Edward Ward MBE Construction Industry We’ve Got 10 Million Summer Ball 2010 Saturday 26th June 2010 Reasons to be Proud… The Honourable Artillery Company, Chairman of the Benevolent Fund Mark Everett explains why… London Tickets are now on sale for this extremely popular “I’m sure when Edward Ward and his colleagues miraculously missing every major organ in his annual event. To make things easy we’ve enclosed a sat down to dinner on that memorable day in body. He woke up 32 days later having spent a booking form inside this issue. Make sure you book 1956 and formed the Lighthouse Club he never month in a coma. He was awarded monthly early to avoid disappointment. imagined in his wildest dreams that 54 years help for 3 years and went on to retrain within Tickets are £160 each or £1,600 for a table of 10 later the club would be as strong as ever, still the construction industry. He now has an office For more information on the Ball living by those original values of fellowship and job in a planning department. please contact Marian Webb consideration for others. Tel: 01895 829761 or e-mail [email protected] It’s this kind of story which I hope will inspire all Nor would he have believed the Lighthouse of us to try just a little bit harder. If each of us Club would go on to give away £10 million to signed up just one friend or colleague as a new thousands of construction workers and their member we would double our strength. -
Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions
THE LONDON RESORT PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions WATER QUALITY 13.2.1. The principal water quality data sources that have been used to inform this study are: • Environment Agency (EA) WFD classification status and reporting (e.g. EA 2015); and • EA long-term water quality monitoring data for the tidal Thames. Environment Agency WFD Classification Status 13.2.2. The tidal River Thames is divided into three transitional water bodies as part of the Thames River Basin Management Plan (EA 2015) (Thames Upper [ID GB530603911403], Thames Middle [ID GB53060391140] and Thames Lower [ID GB530603911401]. Each of these waterbodies are classified as heavily modified waterbodies (HMWBs). The most recent EA assessment carried out in 2016, confirms that all three of these water bodies are classified as being at Moderate ecological potential (EA 2018). 13.2.3. The Thames Estuary at the London Resort Project Site is located within the Thames Middle Transitional water body, which is a heavily modified water body on account of the following designated uses (Cycle 2 2015-2021): • Coastal protection; • Flood protection; and • Navigation. 13.2.4. The downstream extent of the Thames Middle transitional water body is located approximately 12 km downstream of the Kent Project Site and 8 km downstream of the Essex Project Site near Lower Hope Point. Downstream of this location is the Thames Lower water body which extends to the outer Thames Estuary. 13.2.5. A summary of the current Thames Middle water body WFD status is presented in Table A13.2.1, together with those supporting elements that do not currently meet at least Good status and their associated objectives. -
Yorbuild2 East Area Framework – List of Unsuccessful Candidates at ITT Lot 1 0-£250K
YORbuild2 East Area Framework – list of unsuccessful candidates at ITT Lot 1 0-£250k Applicant T H Michaels (Construction) Ltd Evora Construction Limited Britcon Limited George Hurst & Sons Ltd FMe Property Solutions Ltd The Soper Group Ltd Transcore Limited J C Services & Son Ltd Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd Stubbs Brothers Building Services Limited Unico Construction Limited Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 2 over £250k-£1m Applicant S Voase Builders Limited F Parkinson Ltd Britcon Limited RN Wooler & Co Ltd Illingworth & Gregory Ltd George Hurst & Sons Ltd T H Michaels (Construction) Ltd Transcore Limited PBS Construction Elliott Group Northern Construction Solutions Ltd Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 3 over £1m-£4m Applicant Wildgoose Construction ltd Esh Construction Limited Morgan Sindall George Hurst & Sons Ltd Britcon Limited Hall Construction Group Caddick Construction Limited Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd F Parkinson Ltd Gentoo Tolent GMI Construction Group PLC United Living Lot 4 over £4m-£10m Applicant Conlon Construction Limited Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd Keepmoat Regeneration Limited Henry Boot Construction Limited Morgan Sindall Hobson and Porter Ltd Robertson Construction Group Ltd Eric Wright Group VINCI Construction UK Limited G F Tomlinson Group Limited Sewell Group Britcon Limited Lot 5 over £10m Applicant Henry Boot Construction Limited Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd John Graham Construction Ltd Morgan Sindall McLaughlin & Harvey (formally Barr Construction Ltd) Eric Wright Group VINCI Construction UK Limited Robertson Construction Group Ltd Caddick Construction Limited J F Finnegan Limited Shepherd Construction Lot 6 New housing up to 10 units Applicant GEDA Construction Lindum Group Limited Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 7 New housing over 10 units Applicant Gentoo Tolent Herbert T Forrest Ltd Lindum Group Limited Termrim Construction Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd GEDA Construction . -
Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 – Main Text 19/02/18 Status: A1 Signed Off - Publication Document Ref: HE543917-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000001.Docx
Et12 Regional Investment Programme A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 – Main Text 19/02/18 Status: A1 Signed off - Publication Document Ref: HE543917-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000001.docx Regional Investment Programme A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 – Main Text Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvement Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 183 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: HE543917 Document ref: HE543917-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000001 Purpose Revision Status Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date description Issue for C03 A1 AR LJB AMB CH 19/02/18 Consultation C02 B1 For HE 2nd Review AR LJB AMB AEM 16/02/18 For Initial Review & C01 A1 AR LJB AMB CH 26/01/18 Comment Client signoff Client Highways England Project A2 Bean Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Document title Regional Investment Programme A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Job no. HE543917 Copy no. Document HE543917-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000001 C03 reference Status A1 Signed off - Publication Revision C03 Page 2 of 183 Regional Investment Programme A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 – Main Text Table of contents Chapter Pages Volume 1 7 Chapter 1 - Introduction 8 1.1. Overview of project 8 1.2. Purpose of the Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) 9 1.3. -
International Technology Directory
:~ -'" . International Technology Directory Licensing Executives Society Technology Directory Committee July 1988 LES INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. LETTER OF INTRODUCTION (ii) ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDED (ill) ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF UNNERSITIES, NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, BROKERS, AND CONSULTANTS (vi) TECHNOLOGY CATEGORIES 1. Food Products and Processing 1 2. Textile Products and Processing 1 3. Synthetic Fiber (fiber production, processing, raw materials) 1 4. Pulp and Paper, Wood Products, Lumber 2 5. Plastics (resins, processes, equipment) 2 6. Petroleum Refining, Products and Processing 3 7. Rubber and Plastic Products and Processing 4 8. Stone, Glass, Clay Products and Processing 4 9. Metals (smelting, refining, steehnaking) 5 10. Mining and Extraction (minerals, metals, coal, gas, oil) 5 11. Industrial Inorganic Chemical Products and Processing 6 12. Industrial Organic Chemical Products and Processing 6 13. Agricultural Chemicals (fertilizers, pesticides) 8 14. Drugs (human and animal medicinal products) 8 15. Packaging, Graphics, Printing 10 16. Soaps, Detergents, Cosmetics, Toiletries 11 17. Paints, Varnishes, Coatings, Adhesives 11 18. Computers, Data Transmission, Communications and Software 12 19. Electrical and Electronic Equipment 13 20. Mechanical Machinery and Equipment 14 21. Transportation and Lifting Equipment 15 22. Energy (generation, distribution and controls) 15 23. Pollution Control (gas, liquid, SOlid) 16 24. Instruments, Devices, Controls and Systems 16 25. Photographic Devices, Optical Instruments and Lenses 17 26. Medical, Surgical and Dental Instruments (devices and supplies) 18 27. Biotechnology 18 28. Other (such as: Sports and leisure, plants, horticulture, etc.) 20 UNNERSITY AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 22 TECHNOLOGYTRANSFER CONSULTANTS AND BROKERS 32 6TH EDITION July 1988 (i) ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDED UNDER TECHNOLOGY CATEGORIES A c JALSTHOM 19,21 "'cw. -
Region Builder Site Manager Site Name Site Address North West
Quality Award Winners - North West Region Builder Site Manager Site Name Site Address North West Anwyl Homes Lancashire Chris Johnston Bluebell Meadows Ladybank Avenue, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire North West Barratt and David Wilson Homes North West Gary Atherton Stanneylands Little Stanneylands, Wilmslow, Cheshire North West Barratt and David Wilson Homes North West Will Mills Lightfoot Meadows Lightfoot Lane, Preston, Lancashire North West Barratt Manchester Martin Couch J One Seven Old Mill Road, Sandbach, Cheshire North West Barratt Manchester Peter Fallon Imperial Park II Rosemary Drive, Winnington Village, Northwich, Cheshire North West Barratt Manchester Craig Hancock College Gardens Sutton Way, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire North West Barratt Manchester Steven Jordan Willow Gardens New Road, Tintwistle, Glossop, Derbyshire North West Barratt Manchester Sean O'Regan Hillside Central Fields Farm Road, Hattersley, Hyde, Greater Manchester North West Barratt Manchester Neil Salisbury Wesley Chase Lightfoot Lane, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire North West Bellway Homes Manchester Tony Charnock Pocket Green Off Crompton Way, Lowton, Cheshire North West Bellway Homes Manchester Karl Henshaw Heatherley Wood Alderley Park, Congleton Road, Nether Alderley, Cheshire North West Bellway Homes Manchester Daniel McCarron Barton Quarter Chorley New Road, Horwich, Bolton, Lancashire North West Bellway Homes Manchester Harry McEvoy The Brackens Off Campbell Road, Swinton, Greater Manchester North West Bellway Homes North West Paul McKeever Primrose Meadow -
Valuation Report for Site at Langlea Road Cambuslang G72
Valuation Report for Site at Langlea Road Cambuslang G72 8HG Report for: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX South Lanarkshire Council Prepared by: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Senior Surveyor RICS Registered Valuer DVS Tel: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX [email protected] Case Number: 1535377 Client Reference: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Date: 22 July 2015 Client Ref: CR/14/0200 VOA Ref: 1535377 Date: 22 July 2015 Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Valuation Parameters ........................................................................................ 3 3. Property Information .......................................................................................... 6 4. Valuation ...........................................................................................................10 5. General Information ..........................................................................................16 6. Appendices .......................................................................................................18 6.1 Plans .......................................................................................................................18 6.2 Photographs ............................................................................................................19 Executive Summary 1.1 Description Planning application CR/14/0200 proposes residential -
Experience Options Analysis: Mapping the Experiential Product in Kent September 2020
Experience Options Analysis: Mapping the Experiential Product in Kent September 2020 Funded by: Delivered by: With support from: SW Consulting Contents Mapping the experience product in Kent 3 Options analysis for West Kent 23-31 Experience Travel Trends for 2020/21 4 - Core Strengths (Fig 1.5) Where is the customer looking? 7 - Opportunities - TripAdvisor 7 Options Analysis : - Airbnb. (Fig 1.1) 8 - Ashford Borough Putting the visitor first 9 - Tunbridge Wells Borough The benefits of experience tourism for Kent (Fig 1.2/1.3) 10 - Maidstone, Tonbridge, Sevenoaks Product options focus: Options analysis for East Kent 11 -22 Options analysis for North Kent 32-40 - Core Strengths (fig 1.4) - Core Strengths (Fig 1.6) - Opportunities - Opportunities Options Analysis : Options Analysis : - Folkestone, Hythe & Romney Marsh - Medway - White Cliffs Country – Dover Deal & Sandwich - Gravesham - Canterbury, Herne Bay & Whitstable - Swale & Dartford - Thanet – Margate, Ramsgate, Broadstairs Partnership working opportunities 41 Appendix 1 Kent Product Snapshot: 42-44 Seasonal Potential/ Strengths, Opportunities & Gap analysis 2 Mapping the experiential product in Kent Context Over the past 10 years, travellers have increasingly sought out ‘more’ from their leisure time, continually hunting for that truly local and authentic experience that separates them from the tourism hordes. Whether this is the secluded beach that no one else seems to have discovered or the best family run restaurant in the district, visitors gain an immense sense of personal achievement to have found ‘the best, authentic, most unique, secret, unusual and downright bizarre’; and when they take to social media this experience becomes an almost ‘badge of honour’, that all who follow will want to obtain. -
CRR 446/2002 a Study of the Provision of Health and Safety Information in the Annual Reports of the Top UK Companies
HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Prepared by System Concepts Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 446/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Laura Peebles, Ansgar Kupper and Tanya Heasman System Concepts Ltd 2 Savoy Court Strand London WC2R 0EZ This report details the findings of a research project to investigate the quality and quantity of health and safety information found in the annual reports of the top UK companies. At present, publicly listed companies are not legally required to include health and safety matters in their annual reports. The current Health and Safety Commission (HSC) Strategy Statement, however, contains an action point which focuses on public reporting of health and safety issues by larger companies. The aim is to promote the reporting of health and safety information in company annual reports and to provide guidance that would allow reporting of such information to a common standard. To assist the HSC with this strategy, System Concepts were commissioned by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to undertake an investigation of the provision of health and safety information in company annual reports. The study comprised a series of steps. The main objectives of the study were: i) To determine the current level of reporting of health and safety issues in annual reports of the top UK companies ii) To determine the quality of health and safety information reported.