DOCSLIB.ORG

Framework for Evaluating Customer Value and the Feasibility of Servicing Architectures for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing by Andrew Michael Long

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framework for Evaluating Customer Value and the Feasibility of Servicing Architectures for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing by Andrew Michael Long Framework for Evaluating Customer Value and the Feasibility of Servicing Architectures for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing by Andrew Michael Long B.S. Aerospace Engineering University of Maryland, College Park 2003 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology MASSACHUSETTS INS E June 2005 OF TECHNOLOGY C Massachusetts Institute of Technology JUN 2 3 2005 All rights reserved LIBRARIES A uthor............................... - Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering Systems Division April 30, 2005 C ertified by................................. Dai1el E. Hastings Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Engineering Systems Division Thesis Supervisor Accepted By................................ .................................. Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Te hnology and Policy Program Accepted By................................ Jaime Peraire Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Committee on Graduate Students :AERO 2 Framework for Evaluating Customer Value and the Feasibility of Servicing Architectures for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing by Andrew Michael Long Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division on April 30, 2005 for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract The question that this thesis examines is whether traditional monolithic satellite designs have limited the value that the satellite market generates for the space industry. To answer this question, this thesis focuses on the "Value" that satellites generate. By examining the value that satellites offer their operators, this thesis determines if alternative methods of satellite design offer greater value than traditional satellite designs. One alternative method that is examined is on-orbit satellite servicing. On a basic level, on-orbit satellite servicing is the process of providing services to a satellite in orbit, such as: relocation, refueling, repairs, or upgrades. The purpose of this thesis is to describe and support a framework for determining the value of on-orbit satellite servicing. The framework involves examining on-orbit servicing as a competitive market and dividing that market into two sides -the customer and the provider. By examining the customer side of on-orbit servicing, this thesis identifies the reasons a customer would require servicing and thus determines the value that can be delivered to the customer. By determining the point where the value of servicing is zero, the customer's maximum servicing price can be computed. By examining the provider's side of the market, this thesis identifies the different forms of servicing that can fulfill the customer's needs. Based on a provider's forms of servicing, the provider's minimum servicing price can be determined. Finally, by overlaying the maximum servicing price with the minimum servicing price, one can determine if a feasible on-orbit servicing market exists. If any overlap exists, then a feasible range of servicing prices exists and servicing makes sense. Simply put, an overlap represents the case where a customer need exists and a provider has the ability to meet that need - hence a servicing market exists. This thesis concludes with a discussion concerning the development of on-orbit satellite servicing and how this development is not limited solely by economic and technical issues. It is the purpose of this thesis to show that on-orbit satellite servicing provides a means for escape from the traditional approach of satellite design, thereby allowing a paradigm shift towards more valuable design approaches. While some may believe that on-orbit satellite servicing provides a means to sustain current technology trends, it is argued that on-orbit satellite servicing is a disruptive technology. With disruptive technologies come the opportunities for greater value and dramatic change. On-orbit satellite servicing provides the opportunity for a paradigm shift in satellite design that can lead to dramatic new ideas, uses, and valuations of space. Thesis Supervisor: Professor Daniel Hastings Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Engineering Systems Division 3 To: Erin, Mom, and Dad Thank you for all the support 4 Acknowledgements When I look back at this thesis and reflect on who influenced my research the most, I continually return to my advisor, Daniel Hastings. I can only begin to express my appreciation and gratitude for Professor Hastings' support. I want to thank Professor Hastings for opening my mind to the world of space systems engineering and forcing me to think outside the "black-box." Professor Hastings' ideas, motivation, and shear desire to change the nature of the space enterprise influenced me in ways that I am only beginning to understand. I am extremely grateful! My only hope is that I can remember everything.... I would also like to thank Col. James Shoemaker for his continual support of this research. This research was supported by DARPA under the GrandChallenges in Space, contract # F29601-97-0010. A special thanks goes out to all the current and past members of Professor Hastings' research group: Adam Ross, Spencer Lewis, Jason Bartolomei, Roshanak Nilchiani, Carole Joppin, and Nirav Shah. In particular I would like to thank Adam for his mind-altering conversations, Nirav for his vast intelligence and wonderful teaching ability, and Carole for getting me started on this research. I would like to thank Matt Richards for, if nothing else, reading my thesis. Matt you have been a friend, a colleague, and a great supporter. To you I leave my crazy and wonderful ideas concerning OOS. I hope they serve you well. In addition, I would like to thank Col. John Keesee for his continual support and openness by providing me with information no matter how strange or off topic my questions might have been. I would like to thank my ITAR-research group; David, Matt, Nicole, and Roland. The topic was a little strange at first, but we all learned a great deal about space policy and each other. I also want to thank all the members of the Space Systems Lab at the University of Maryland for teaching me everything I didn't know about engineering. A special thanks to Professor David Akin for teaching me everything I know about space systems. Dave, I know how you felt about my going to MIT, but I think we both know it turned out for the best. I would also like to thank all the other researchers on the Ranger Project: Walt, JM, Kiwi, Scuba, Wendy, Meghan, Eric, Russ, and Perna. You guys were a great inspirational group to work with. Finally, a great appreciation goes to Brian Roberts. Brian without your advice and support over the years I would not be the engineer that I am today. The bulk of my education as an engineer I credit to you. Finally, I would like to thank my family on both sides- this might be a first. Kevin and Sue, thanks for the all the support over the years and thank you for my lovely wife. Also, Sue thank you for all the support in my education over the years as well as for all the advice. Next, special thanks to my dog- Tag. Tag I know you cant read, but thanks for the affection, unconditional love, ball-time, and all the time you listened to my presentations. Incredible thanks go to my parents- Anne and John. I wouldn't be who I am today if it were not for the two of you. Thanks- and as dad puts it "you did good." Finally, I greatly appreciate the support of my wife Erin. Erin without you I wouldn't be where I am today. You keep me focused and have understood and supported me during my time at MIT. You give me motivation to be the best that I can be and at the same time put me in line when I stray. For all of that I am truly grateful... 5 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Spacecraft Failure Trend (Sullivan, 2001) .................................................................... 12 Figure 1-2: U.S Satellite Launch Trends (Aerospace Commission, 2002)....12 Figure 1-3: Satellite Design Life Trend (Futron, 2004) .................................................................. 17 Figure 1-4: XSS-10...................................................................................................0.... 2 F igure 1- 5: X S S-11 ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 1-6: Orbital Express with ASTRO and NextSat ............................................................................ 22 Figure 1-7: Hubble Robotic Servicer Concept (Weiss and Corbo, 2005)................................................ 23 Figure 1-8: ConeXpress........................................................................................24 Figure 1-9: RTFX- Neutral Buoyancy Testing (Ranger, 1998) ................................................................... 25 Figure 1-10: RTSX-Mounted Instead Shuttle Cargo Bay (Ranger, 2002) .............................................. 26 27 N A SA 's R obonaut ..................................................................................................................27 Figure 2-l1:NPctalso1- 11: bOnau........... ............................................. Figure 2-1:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dod Space Technology Guide
    Foreword Space-based capabilities are integral to the U.S.’s national security operational doctrines and processes. Such capa- bilities as reliable, real-time high-bandwidth communica- tions can provide an invaluable combat advantage in terms of clarity of command intentions and flexibility in the face of operational changes. Satellite-generated knowledge of enemy dispositions and movements can be and has been exploited by U.S. and allied commanders to achieve deci- sive victories. Precision navigation and weather data from space permit optimal force disposition, maneuver, decision- making, and responsiveness. At the same time, space systems focused on strategic nuclear assets have enabled the National Command Authorities to act with confidence during times of crisis, secure in their understanding of the strategic force postures. Access to space and the advantages deriving from operat- ing in space are being affected by technological progress If our Armed Forces are to be throughout the world. As in other areas of technology, the faster, more lethal, and more precise in 2020 advantages our military derives from its uses of space are than they are today, we must continue to dynamic. Current space capabilities derive from prior invest in and develop new military capabilities. decades of technology development and application. Joint Vision 2020 Future capabilities will depend on space technology programs of today. Thus, continuing investment in space technologies is needed to maintain the “full spectrum dominance” called for by Joint Vision 2010 and 2020, and to protect freedom of access to space by all law-abiding nations. Trends in the availability and directions of technology clearly suggest that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted to Florida Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfllment of the Requirements for the Degree Of
    Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling by Casey Clark Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering College of Engineering 2016 A thesis submitted to Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Melbourne, Florida July, 2018 ⃝c Copyright 2018 Casey Clark All Rights Reserved The author grants permission to make single copies. We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling by Casey Clark Dr. Tiauw Go, Sc.D. Associate Professor. Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Committee Chair Dr. Jay Kovats, Ph.D. Associate Professor Mathematics Outside Committee Member Dr. Markus Wilde, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Committee Member Dr. Hamid Hefazi, Ph.D. Professor and Department Head Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering ABSTRACT Title: Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling Author: Casey Clark Major Advisor: Dr. Tiauw Go, Sc.D. A quantitative collation of relevant parameters for successfully completed exper- imental on-orbit fuid transfers and anticipated orbital refueling future missions is performed. The dynamics of connected satellites sustaining fuel transfer are derived by treating the connected spacecraft as a rigid body and including an in- ternal mass fow rate. An orbital refueling results in a time-varying local center of mass related to the connected spacecraft. This is accounted for by incorporating a constant mass fow rate in the inertia tensor. Simulations of the equations of motion are performed using the values of the parameters of authentic missions in an endeavor to provide conclusions regarding the efect of an internal mass transfer on the attitude of refueling spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruimtewapens Schuldwoestijn Graffiti Without Gravity Van De Hoofdredacteur
    Ruimtewapens Schuldwoestijn Graffiti without Gravity Van de hoofdredacteur: Het zal u hopelijk niet ontgaan zijn dat, door de komst van het Space Studies Program (SSP) van de International Space University én een groot aantal evenementen in de regio Delft, Den Haag, Leiden en Noordwijk, het een bijzondere ruimtevaartzomer geweest is. Deze ‘Sizzling Summer of Space’ is nu echter toch echt afgelopen. In het volgende nummer staat een nabeschouwing over SSP in Nederland gepland, maar in dit nummer vindt u hiernaast al vast een bijzondere foto van de Koning met de deelnemers tijdens de openingsceremonie en een verslag van een side event gesponsord door de NVR. De voorstelling ‘Fly me to the Moon’ is ook door de NVR ondersteund en is bezocht door een aantal van onze leden. Het theaterstuk maakte mooi gebruik van de bijzondere omgeving van Decos op de Space Campus in Noordwijk. Op de Space Campus zelf zijn veel nieuwe ontwikkelingen gaande waaraan we in de nabije toekomst aandacht willen geven. Bij de voorplaat In dit nummer vindt u het eerste artikel uit een serie over ruimtewapens en een artikel over Gloveboxen dat we Het winnende kunstwerk van de ‘Graffiti without Gravity’ wedstrijd, overgenomen hebben, onder de samenwerkingsover- door Shane Sutton. [ESA/Hague Street Art/S. Sutton] eenkomst met de British Interplanetary Society, uit het blad Spaceflight. Het is goed als Nederlandse partijen zelf positief over hun producten zijn maar het is natuurlijk nog Foto van het kwartaal beter als een onafhankelijke buitenlandse publicatie dat opschrijft. Frappant is verder dat twee artikelen gerelateerd zijn aan lezingen bij het Ruimtevaart Museum in Lelystad, want zowel het boek Schuldwoestijn als het artikel over ruimtewapens zijn onderwerp van een lezing daar geweest.
    [Show full text]
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • STS-S26 Stage Set
    SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare September/October 2010 MilsatMagazine STS-S26 stage set Military satellites Kodiak Island Launch Complex, photo courtesy of Alaska Aerospace Corp. PAYLOAD command center intel Colonel Carol P. Welsch, Commander Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Space Development Group, Kirtland AFB by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................04 Zombiesats & On-Orbit Servicing by Brian Weeden .............................................38 Karl Fuchs, Vice President of Engineering HI-CAP Satellites iDirect Government Technologies by Bruce Rowe ................................................62 by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................32 The Orbiting Vehicle Series (OV1) by Jos Heyman ................................................82 Brig. General Robert T. Osterhaler, U.S.A.F. (Ret.) CEO, SES WORLD SKIES, U.S. Government Solutions by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................76 India’s Missile Defense/Anti-Satellite NEXUS by Victoria Samson ..........................................82 focus Warfighter-On-The-Move by Bhumika Baksir ...........................................22 MILSATCOM For The Next Decade by Chris Hazel .................................................54 The First Line Of Defense by Angie Champsaur .......................................70 MILSATCOM In Harsh Conditions.........................89 2 MILSATMAGAZINE — SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2010 Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Zombiesats & On-Orbit
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of NASA Expendable Vehicle Missions Since 1990
    Chronology of NASA Expendable Vehicle Missions Since 1990 Launch Launch Date Payload Vehicle Site1 June 1, 1990 ROSAT (Roentgen Satellite) Delta II ETR, 5:48 p.m. EDT An X-ray observatory developed through a cooperative program between Germany, the U.S., and (Delta 195) LC 17A the United Kingdom. Originally proposed by the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE) and designed, built and operated in Germany. Launched into Earth orbit on a U.S. Air Force vehicle. Mission ended after almost nine years, on Feb. 12, 1999. July 25, 1990 CRRES (Combined Radiation and Release Effects Satellite) Atlas I ETR, 3:21 p.m. EDT NASA payload. Launched into a geosynchronous transfer orbit for a nominal three-year mission to (AC-69) LC 36B investigate fields, plasmas, and energetic particles inside the Earth's magnetosphere. Due to onboard battery failure, contact with the spacecraft was lost on Oct. 12, 1991. May 14, 1991 NOAA-D (TIROS) (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-D) Atlas-E WTR, 11:52 a.m. EDT A Television Infrared Observing System (TIROS) satellite. NASA-developed payload; USAF (Atlas 50-E) SLC 4 vehicle. Launched into sun-synchronous polar orbit to allow the satellite to view the Earth's entire surface and cloud cover every 12 hours. Redesignated NOAA-12 once in orbit. June 29, 1991 REX (Radiation Experiment) Scout 216 WTR, 10:00 a.m. EDT USAF payload; NASA vehicle. Launched into 450 nm polar orbit. Designed to study scintillation SLC 5 effects of the Earth's atmosphere on RF transmissions. 114th launch of Scout vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Centaur Launches
    Centaur Launch Record 1962 -2012 No Veh No Date Failure Payload Launch Vehicle Mgmt. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Centaur Developmental Program 1 AC- 1 05.09.1962 F* Centaur AC-1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-A MSFC 2 AC- 2 11.27.1963 Centaur AC-2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-B Lewis 3 AC- 3 06.30.1964 F Centaur AC-3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 4 AC- 4 12.11.1964 Surveyor-Model -1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 5 AC- 5 03.02.1965 F Surveyor-SD 1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 6 AC- 6 08.11.1965 Surveyor-SD 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 7 AC- 8 04.07.1966 Surveyor-SD 3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis Centaur-D Surveyor Missions 8 AC- 10 05.30.1966 Surveyor 1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 9 AC- 7 09.20.1966 Surveyor 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 10 AC- 9 10.26.1966 Surveyor-SD 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 11 AC- 12 04.17.1967 Surveyor 3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 12 AC- 11 07.14.1967 Surveyor 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 13 AC- 13 09.08.1967 Surveyor 5 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 14 AC- 14 11.07.1967 Surveyor 6 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 15 AC- 15 01.07.1968 Surveyor 7 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis Centaur-D Spacecraft and Satellites 16 AC- 17 08.10.1968 F ATS 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 17 AC- 16 12.07.1968 OAO 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 18 AC- 20 02.24.1969 Mariner 6 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 19 AC- 19 03.27.1969 Mariner 7 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 20 AC- 18 08.12.1969 ATS 5 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 21 AC- 21 11.30.1970 F OAO B Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 22 AC- 25 01.25.1971
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Spacecraft Configurations MAE 342 2016
    2/12/20 Spacecraft Configurations Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University Robert Stengel • Angular control approaches • Low-Earth-orbit configurations – Satellite buses – Nanosats/cubesats – Earth resources satellites – Atmospheric science and meteorology satellites – Navigation satellites – Communications satellites – Astronomy satellites – Military satellites – Tethered satellites • Lunar configurations • Deep-space configurations Copyright 2016 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. 1 http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE342.html 1 Angular Attitude of Satellite Configurations • Spinning satellites – Angular attitude maintained by gyroscopic moment • Randomly oriented satellites and magnetic coil – Angular attitude is free to vary – Axisymmetric distribution of mass, solar cells, and instruments Television Infrared Observation (TIROS-7) Orbital Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio (OSCAR-1) ESSA-2 TIROS “Cartwheel” 2 2 1 2/12/20 Attitude-Controlled Satellite Configurations • Dual-spin satellites • Attitude-controlled satellites – Angular attitude maintained by gyroscopic moment and thrusters – Angular attitude maintained by 3-axis control system – Axisymmetric distribution of mass and solar cells – Non-symmetric distribution of mass, solar cells – Instruments and antennas do not spin and instruments INTELSAT-IVA NOAA-17 3 3 LADEE Bus Modules Satellite Buses Standardization of common components for a variety of missions Modular Common Spacecraft Bus Lander Congiguration 4 4 2 2/12/20 Hine et al 5 5 Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance, Navigation and Control System for Autonomous Proximity Operations and Docking of Spacecraft
    Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2009 Guidance, navigation and control system for autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft Daero Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Recommended Citation Lee, Daero, "Guidance, navigation and control system for autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft" (2009). Doctoral Dissertations. 1942. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/1942 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS PROXIMITY OPERATIONS AND DOCKING OF SPACECRAFT by DAERO LEE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2009 Approved by Henry Pernicka, Advisor Jagannathan Sarangapani Ashok Midha Robert G. Landers Cihan H Dagli 2009 DAERO LEE All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT This study develops an integrated guidance, navigation and control system for use in autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft. A new approach strategy is proposed based on a modified system developed for use with the International Space Station. It is composed of three “V-bar hops” in the closing transfer phase, two periods of stationkeeping and a “straight line V-bar” approach to the docking port.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on the Societal and Economic Impacts of Severe Space Weather Events: a Workshop
    Committee on the Societal and Economic Impacts of Severe Space Weather Events: A Workshop Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by the Contract NASW-01001 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this pub- lication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. Cover: (Upper left) A looping eruptive prominence blasted out from a powerful active region on July 29, 2005, and within an hour had broken away from the Sun. Active regions are areas of strong magnetic forces. Image courtesy of SOHO, a project of international cooperation between the European Space Agency and NASA. International Standard Book Number 13: 978-0-309-12769-1 International Standard Book Number 10: 0-309-12769-6 Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Space Studies Board National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Wash- ington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Geostationary Ring
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 November 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0629.v2 Article GEO-GEO Stereo-Tracking of Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) from the Geostationary Ring James L. Carr 1,* , Dong L. Wu 2 , Jaime Daniels 3 , Mariel D. Friberg 2,4 , Wayne Bresky 5 and Houria Madani 1 1 Carr Astronautics, 6404 Ivy Lane, Suite 333, Greenbelt, MD 20770, USA; [email protected] 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20770, USA; [email protected] 3 NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research, College Park, MD 20740, USA 4 Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD 21046, USA 5 I.M. Systems Group (IMSG), Rockville, MD 20852, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Height assignment is an important problem for satellite measurements of Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) that are interpreted as winds by forecast and assimilation systems. Stereo methods assign heights to AMVs from the parallax observed between observations from different vantage points in orbit while tracking cloud or moisture features. In this paper, we fully develop the stereo method to jointly retrieve wind vectors with their geometric heights from geostationary satellite pairs. Synchronization of observations between observing systems is not required. NASA and NOAA stereo-winds codes have implemented this method and we have processed large datasets from GOES-16, -17, and Himawari-8. Our retrievals are validated against rawinsonde observations and demonstrate the potential to improve forecast skill. Stereo winds also offer an important mitigation for the loop heat pipe anomaly on GOES-17 during times when warm focal plane temperatures cause infra-red channels that are needed for operational height assignments to fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]