Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agee
Review
Going where no grains have gone before: From early to mid-succession
a, b c d
Timothy E. Crews *, Jennifer Blesh , Steven W. Culman , Richard C. Hayes ,
e f g h
Erik Steen Jensen , Michelle C. Mack , Mark B. Peoples , Meagan E. Schipanski
a
The Land Institute, 2440 E. Water Well Rd., Salina, KS 67401, United States
b
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
c
School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 130 Williams Hall, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691, United States
d
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
e
Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 103, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
f
Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 5620, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States
g
CSIRO Agriculture, G.P.O. Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
h
Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, 307 University Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Annual-based arable agroecosystems experience among the greatest frequency, extent and magnitude of
Received 12 November 2015
disturbance regimes of all terrestrial ecosystems. In order to control non-crop vegetation, farmers
Received in revised form 6 March 2016
implement tillage practices and/or utilize herbicides. These practices effectively shift the farmed
Accepted 8 March 2016
ecosystems to early stages of secondary succession where they remain as long as annual crops are grown.
Available online 15 March 2016
Humanity’s long-standing dependence on a disturbance-based food and fiber producing ecosystem has
resulted in degraded soil structure, unsustainable levels of soil erosion, losses of soil organic matter, low
Keywords:
nutrient and water retention, severe weed challenges, and a less-diverse or functional soil microbiome.
Agroecosystem
While no-till cropping systems have reduced some hazards like soil erosion, they remain compromised
Disturbance
Intercrop with respect to ecosystem functions like water and nutrient uptake, and carbon sequestration compared
Legume to many later successional ecosystems. Recent advances in the development of perennial grain crop
Nitrogen species invite consideration of the ecological implications of farming grains further down the
Perennial successional gradient than ever before possible. In this review, we specifically explore how the nitrogen
Soil organic matter
(N) economy of a mid-successional agroecosystem might differ from early-successional annual grain
ecosystems as well as native mid-successional grassland ecosystems. We present a conceptual model
that compares changes in soil organic matter, net ecosystem productivity, N availability, and N retention
through ecosystem succession. Research from the agronomic and ecological literatures suggest that mid-
successional grain agriculture should feature several ecological functions that could greatly improve
synchrony between soil N supply and crop demands; these include larger active soil organic matter pools,
a more trophically complex and stable soil microbiome that facilitates higher turnover rates of available
N, greater N retention due to greater assimilation and seasonal translocation by deeply rooted perennial
species as well as greater microbial immobilization. Compared to native mid-successional grasslands
that cycle the majority of N required to maintain productivity within the ecosystem, a mid-successional
agriculture would require greater external N inputs to balance N exports in food. Synthetic N fertilizer
could make up this deficit, but in the interest of maximizing ecological intensification in order to
minimize inputs and associated environmental consequences, we explore making up the N deficit with
biological N2 fixation. The dominant approach to addressing problems in agriculture is to target specific
shortcomings such as nutrient retention or weed invasion. Moving agriculture down the successional
gradient promises to change the nature of the ecosystem itself, shifting attention from symptom to cause,
such that ecological intensification and provision of a broader suite of ecosystem services happen not in
spite of, but as a consequence of agriculture.
ã 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (T.E. Crews), [email protected] (J. Blesh), [email protected] (S.W. Culman), [email protected] (R.C. Hayes),
[email protected] (E.S. Jensen), [email protected] (M.C. Mack), [email protected] (M.B. Peoples), [email protected] (M.E. Schipanski).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.012
0167-8809/ã 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
224 T.E. Crews et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238
Contents
1. Introduction ...... 224
1.1. Why nitrogen? ...... 224
1.2. Why legumes? ...... 225
2. Succession as an agroecosystem concept ...... 225
2.1. Succession, human roles, and human failures ...... 226
2.2. A conceptual model ...... 226
2.2.1. Changes in soil organic matter (SOM) with ecosystem succession ...... 226
2.2.2. Net ecosystem production (NEP) and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) through ecosystem succession ...... 228
2.2.3. Changes in plant available N with ecosystem succession ...... 228
2.2.4. Changes in N losses via gaseous and leaching pathways ...... 229
3. Mechanisms governing N availability across successional stages ...... 229
3.1. Changes in soil communities that influence N cycling during succession ...... 230
3.2. Nitrogen translocation in perennials ...... 231
4. Nitrogen limitation under conditions of positive NEP and the role of legumes ...... 232
4.1. Legume N2 fixation in annual versus perennial systems ...... 233
4.1.1. Factors that regulate legume productivity ...... 233
4.1.2. Nutrients other than N ...... 234
4.1.3. Soil mineral N ...... 234
4.2. N-transfer from legume to crop ...... 234
5. Conclusion ...... 235
Acknowledgements ...... 236
References ...... 236
1. Introduction programs in multiple countries are now developing hybrid plant
populations or new domestications of perennial grain crops, with
In contrast to native ecosystems, agricultural ecosystems tend promising early results for perennial wheat (Triticum spp.
to include far fewer species of plants and animals. Agroecologists Thinopyrum spp.), rice (Oryza sativa O. longistaminata), sorghum
have recognized this distinction for some time, and the topic of (Sorghum bicolor S. halepense), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and
how much and what type of planned agrobiodiversity would oilseeds (Batello et al., 2013; Kantar et al., 2016).
improve the functionality and ecological intensification of A perennial crop agriculture that exists in a later stage of
agriculture continues to receive a great deal of attention succession is predicted to change – in some cases dramatically –
(Bommarco et al., 2013; Lin, 2011; Swift et al., 2004). A second with respect to multiple agroecosystem processes and attributes
broad distinction between native and agroecosystems—one that including soil and nutrient retention, C sequestration, water
has received far less attention from agroecologists—is that of infiltration and uptake efficiencies, weed suppression, phosphorus
succession. Following disturbance, native ecosystems regain (P) and N availability and soil structure (Glover et al., 2007;
functionality through successional changes that strengthen a Robertson et al., 2011). All of these merit consideration, but here
range of internal, regulating feedbacks. In contrast, due to we focus on how the N economy of a mid-successional agro-
recurring tillage events or herbicide applications, annual crop ecosystem might change across successional seres, highlighting
ecosystems remain arrested in a disturbed, less regulated state of differences between perennial and annual agroecosystems, as well
early secondary succession (Smith, 2014). As a result, degrading as unique positive and negative attributes of a mid-successional
processes of soil erosion (Montgomery, 2007), nutrient and water ecosystem that have yet to be considered in an agricultural context.
leaching (MEA, 2005; Vitousek and Reiners, 1975), soil organic Although we focus primarily on N, we also examine ecosystem
matter decline (Davidson and Ackerman, 1993), and extensive attributes and feedbacks that govern the N economy such as
weed establishment (Liebman and Mohler, 2001) compromise the changes in soil C balance, microbiome, and dominant forms of soil
agroecosystems themselves as well as ecosystems situated down P.
wind, hill or stream. Under these conditions, the opportunities for
achieving production goals through ecological intensification are 1.1. Why nitrogen?
limited (Tittonell and Giller, 2013).
In attempts to rein in the consequences of chronic perturbation, The importance of N in sustaining food production, and the
agronomists and ecologists have developed cropping systems that serious challenges faced by farmers to manage N resources
attempt to maximize continuous plant cover on the landscape efficiently make it a salient topic in the context of disturbance
through cover crops or integration of perennial buffer strips or and succession. Nitrogen is the nutrient that most commonly
forage crops (Blesh and Drinkwater, 2013; Liebman et al., 2013). limits the productivity of agroecosystems and, either alone or with
These systems have demonstrated improvements in nutrient P, native terrestrial ecosystems (Robertson and Vitousek, 2009;
retention, carbon (C) accumulation and weed suppression through Vitousek and Howarth, 1991). Yet on average, only 30–50% of N
reduction of soil disturbance and vegetation replacement, and applied is recovered in a fertilized grain crop, and beyond that, <7%
there is good reason to incentivize their adoption. However, these of the applied N is recovered in up to six subsequent crops (Gardner
efforts fall short of addressing the root of agriculture’s successional and Drinkwater, 2009; Ladha et al., 2005). Low N fertilizer uptake
stagnation. Critical to the development of numerous ecosystem efficiencies, caused by the application of high concentrations of the
functions in native ecosystem succession—indeed critical to most soluble N forms to fields at times when annual crop roots are
succession itself—is the transition from community dominance either underdeveloped or not present at all, result in substantial N
by annual to perennial plant species (Connell and Slatyer, 1977). losses to the environment (Robertson et al., 2011). Nitrate-N and to
The prospect of establishing a parallel successional trajectory in a lesser extent dissolved organic N is lost to surface or groundwater
agriculture could be transformative (Fig. 1). To this end, breeding via hydrologic pathways, causing local contamination of
T.E. Crews et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238 225
Fig.1. Example of a perennial grain-legume intercrop through a growing season. (a) Spring. The two species break winter dormancy producing similar aboveground biomass.
(b) Early summer. The canopy of the grain crop overshadows and suppresses the legume. Late summer. Following grain harvest, light reaches the legume inducing a surge of
growth and N2 fixation. Livestock grazing or mowing may be employed to manage biomass accumulation.
freshwater sources (Townsend et al., 2003), or eutrophication of coupling soil N inputs with C inputs, legumes can reduce
downstream marine ecosystems (Rabalais et al., 2007). In addition, unintentional N losses to the environment, and thus reduce the
N is lost from fertilized croplands in the form of greenhouse gases N inputs required to produce a crop (Blesh and Drinkwater, 2013;
such as ammonia and nitrous oxide (Robertson et al., 2012). Drinkwater and Snapp, 2007).
It is unclear whether fertilized, single species stands of
1.2. Why legumes? perennial grains would emit lower rates of the greenhouse gas
nitrous oxide compared to single species stands of annual crops.
Replacing single species stands of annual grains with perennial Nitrous oxide fluxes are primarily driven by three interacting
grains would substantially reduce N losses, at least through nitrate factors: soil nitrate concentrations, water filled pore space and soil
leaching, and associated environmental impacts (e.g., Culman C availability (Robertson et al., 2012). Perennial crop species are
et al., 2013). However, single species perennial stands would also expected to reduce soil nitrate and water contents, but increase
require exogenous N to sustain, and reliance on synthetic fertilizer active C relative to annual crops (Robertson et al., 2011). However,
as the primary N input carries many direct and indirect costs. pulses of soluble N fertilizer can still be vulnerable to gaseous
Synthetic N fertilizers constitute the greatest input of commercial conversion if the timing of intense precipitation events coincide
energy (typically fossil fuels ranging from natural gas to coal) into with fertilization (Crews and Peoples, 2005). Since plant-available
industrial agriculture (Smil, 2001). Globally, about 1.3% of all forms of legume-fixed N inputs enter through the more gradual,
commercial energy resources are expended in N fertilizer biological process of mineralization, the risk of nitrous oxide
production (Crews and Peoples, 2004), and the associated CO2 emissions might be expected to be relatively lower than from
emissions can significantly offset any potential C sequestration in fertilizer sources (Jensen et al., 2012; Peoples et al., 2009b).
soil from alternative land-use practices such as shifting to In addition to the economic, energetic and greenhouse gas
perennial crop species (Schlesinger, 1999). Symbiotic N2 fixation concerns around N fertilizers, the integration of legumes into grain
by legumes and associated rhizobia bacteria can provide substan- agriculture constitutes an important avenue of ecological intensi-
tial N inputs to agroecosystems using solar rather than fossil fication that can deliver pest and pathogen regulating services
energy (Crews and Peoples, 2004; Herridge et al., 2008). This can associated with greater crop diversity (Bommarco et al., 2013;
be a significant factor in the ability for many farmers in less Crews and Peoples, 2004).
developed countries to obtain costly N inputs (Vitousek et al.,
2009). 2. Succession as an agroecosystem concept
The updated Planetary Boundary analysis (Steffen et al., 2015)
estimates that the input of new reactive N (synthetic and Ecological succession is an overarching term describing
agricultural N2 fixation) should be limited to about 40% of present directional changes in the composition of biological communities
use in order to be within the safe operating space in relation to and their ecosystem processes through time (Odum, 1969).
intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Primary succession is the process by which new rock or other
Earth system. This underscores the importance of achieving much soil parent materials are colonized by organisms for the first time.
greater N uptake efficiencies than currently achieved in cropping Secondary succession, in contrast, begins following a disturbance
systems fertilized with highly mobile forms of synthetic N. By to an already developed ecosystem by fire, flood, drought, or any
226 T.E. Crews et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238
other impact that drastically upsets the dominance of the 2.2. A conceptual model
established community (Whittaker, 1975).
Walker and Willig (1999) characterize the relative impact of To help think about agriculture in a successional context, we
terrestrial disturbance regimes based on their frequency, extent and introduce a conceptual model in which a native grassland
magnitude. Frequency is the number of disturbance events per unit ecosystem is converted to annual agriculture and then allowed
time, extent is the physical area affected by a disturbance, often to return to native grassland or a perennial grain-legume intercrop
reported as the proportion of a landscape affected by a disturbance (Fig. 2a–d). We term the five stages of succession depicted as: mid-
event, and magnitude is based on the intensity and severity of the steady state, retro, early-steady state, maturing, and a return to
disturbance impact. Few if any terrestrial ecosystems experience mid-steady state. We proceed to describe how a range of
the cumulative disturbance impact that characterize annual ecosystem properties and functions that ultimately regulate the
agroecosystems when frequency, extent and magnitude are synchrony of soil N supply and crop demand change across the
considered together (Walker and Willig, 1999). Most disturbances successional model. In the process of considering the ecological
that re-set unmanaged ecosystems to an earlier successional state implications of a mid-successional agriculture, we will address the
or “sere” result in some loss of soil organic matter and nutrients. following questions:
However, except following extreme perturbations, regrowth of
vegetation commonly slows and then reverses the disturbance- 1) Which ecosystem functions might be expected to change as a
related losses (Blair et al., 1998; Chapin et al., 2012). Agricultural result of a shifting from an early-successional to a mid-
soils that are chronically disturbed – often experiencing levels of successional agroecosystem?
erosion well beyond replacement rates – can be thought of as 2) What unique challenges exist to achieving a high level of N
occupying a state of development somewhere between primary synchrony between soil N supply and crop N demands in a
and secondary succession. perennial grain agroecosystem?
The concept of succession has undergone considerable scrutiny 3) Could a mid-successional agroecosystem that features a
and revision in the last century (Connell and Slatyer, 1977; legume-grain intercrop maintain crop productivity without
Götzenberger et al., 2011). No longer do ecologists see plant inputs of synthetic N?
communities through a Clementsian lens in which highly
organized coherent groupings or “superorganisms” undergo
predictable additions, substitutions and losses of species through 2.2.1. Changes in soil organic matter (SOM) with ecosystem succession
time (Clements, 1916). Communities are now seen as unique, Grasslands are frequently maintained in an oscillating, mid-
interacting assemblages of individual species with different co- successional steady state—sometimes functioning as a C sink
evolutionary histories. Nevertheless, community ecologists still during favorable climatic episodes, and sometimes as C sources,
acknowledge that directional changes in community and ecosys- when disturbed by grazing, fire or drought, with the time-averaged
tem properties occur, and some of these changes have relevance to C balance approaching equilibrium (Frank and Dugas, 2001; Suyker
agriculture. An example is the predictable, almost universal et al., 2003). The mid-successional native grassland in the simple
transition in plant community physiognomy from annual to model we propose has approached the maximum SOM content
perennial species following major disturbances. possible for a grassland ecosystem given climate, soil texture,
primary productivity and disturbance regimes (Fig. 2a). When the
2.1. Succession, human roles, and human failures soil is initially plowed for annual grain cropping, SOM contents
immediately begin to decline (Davidson and Ackerman, 1993;
Crop domestication has led to remarkable increases in Schimel et al., 1985); we call this period retro-successional as the
evolutionary success (fitness) of selected plant species. For ecosystem is set back to an earlier stage of development. SOM
example, wheat (Triticum aestivum) covers more area (220 million declines for two general reasons—increased heterotrophic respi-
ha) than any other crop plant on Earth strictly because humans ration and lower belowground net primary productivity. With
have found it in their interest to expand its range (Fischer et al., tillage, soil aggregates are pulverized and previously stabilized
2014). Similar to favoring individual species, humans have also SOM is exposed to microbes, oxygen and warmer temperatures,
favored certain ecosystems. In particular, we have greatly resulting in rapid microbial mineralization of SOM and associated
expanded the spatial extent of highly disturbed early successional losses of organic C as CO2 via microbial respiration (Lorenz and Lal,
seres to approximately 11% of ice-free surface area today 2012). Agroecosystems tend to have less than or equal rates of net
attributable to agriculture alone. Highly disturbed, unmanaged primary production (NPP) compared to the native ecosystems
ecosystems tend to be dominated by pioneering annual plant replaced, with the main exception of irrigated croplands (Field,
species, which predictably lose out to perennial species in a matter 2001). Moreover, annual grains allocate approximately 15–20% of
of years due to competition for light or soil resources (McLendon NPP belowground (Goudriaan et al., 2001; Whalen and Sampedro,
and Redente, 1992; Tilman, 1988). 2009) in contrast to native ecosystems such as perennial grass-
To prepare fields for sowing annual crops, all perennial and lands that allocate closer to 50% of NPP belowground (Saugier et al.,
annual vegetation covering the landscape is eliminated one or 2001).
more times per year, and stocks of soil organic matter decline, Related to the higher belowground allocation pattern of
regressing the ecosystem to very early secondary succession where perennials is the depth of root penetration into the soil profile.
it remains arrested for decades to centuries, until tillage ceases and Perennial grasses have been shown to extend roots three times as
perennial vegetation is restored (Smith, 2014). Work by Mont- deep into the profile of a sandy soil in a Mediterranean
gomery (2007) comparing estimates of soil formation and soil loss environment after only five years compared to conventional
rates in agriculture and under native vegetation suggests that soil wheat and barley (Hordeum vulgare) crops (Ward et al., 2015). It has
erosion rates exceed formation rates on a majority of agricultural become increasingly clear that roots are the most important source
landscapes—including no-till, stubble retention annual cropping of C inputs that feed the formation of soil organic matter (Schmidt
systems. This begs the question of whether it is possible to build et al., 2011). Thus, the enhanced mineralization of SOM that follows
soil under annual vegetation, or whether annual agriculture is the initiation of plowing, coupled with a large reduction in SOM-
inherently dependent on soil formed under the native perennial forming root inputs with the shift from perennial to annual
vegetation that came before. vegetation results in SOM decline as a universal feature of annual
T.E. Crews et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238 227
Fig. 2. A conceptual model of changes in ecosystem properties that regulate the nitrogen cycle across a successional gradient. The gradient involves a well-established, mid-
successional grassland that is converted to annual agriculture and then allowed to revert back to a grassland or planted to a perennial intercrop. (a) Changes in potential soil
organic matter contents and C:N ratio with grassland to grassland succession (black solid line), or grassland to perennial intercrop succession (green dashed line); (b) net
ecosystem productivity (NEP) with grassland to grassland succession (solid black line) or grassland to perennial intercrop succession (green dashed line) and net ecosystem
carbon balance (NECB) in both grassland to grassland and grassland to perennial intercrop succession (orange dotted line); (c), plant available N from soil organic matter in
both grassland to grassland and grassland to perennial intercrop succession (black solid line) and inputs of N from biological N2 fixation or the Haber-Bosch process (blue
dotted line); (d) Losses of N via gaseous or leaching pathways as a percentage of N inputs with grassland to grassland succession (black solid line) or grassland to perennial
intercrop succession (green dashed line). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
crop agriculture (Davidson and Ackerman, 1993; Schimel et al., been shown to stabilize at SOM contents slightly higher than in
1985). tilled grain systems (Six et al., 2002), but these observations have
SOM declines for years to decades with continued annual been challenged recently (Powlson et al., 2014). Increasing organic
cropping until a new steady state is approached between crop or inputs into soils through cover crops (Jensen et al., 2012; Poeplau
crop/fallow residue inputs (or other organic matter inputs such as and Don, 2015), legume N sources, compost or manure applications
manure or compost) into the soil and microbially-mediated losses may also increase SOM contents (Drinkwater et al., 1998). But
of C (Parton et al., 1988; Tiessen et al., 1982). By the time annual neither organic or no-till management practices will likely achieve
crop ecosystems have reached what we are calling the early- SOM levels of the native grassland, which features both no-tillage
successional steady state, an average of 30% of SOM has been lost and greater belowground organic matter inputs (Grandy and
relative to the original native ecosystem (Davidson and Ackerman, Robertson, 2007; Lorenz and Lal, 2012).
1993) although losses of greater than 60% have been reported The maturing successional stage (Fig. 2a) begins with the
(Haas et al., 1957). In some no-till systems, this steady state has cessation of tillage and the establishment of colonizing perennial
228 T.E. Crews et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223 (2016) 223–238
species. Soil organic matter contents begin to increase and will phase. With time, SOM contents approach a maximum (Fig. 2a)
generally continue to do so for decades. Based on grassland and once again, respiration approximately equals NPP making NEP