Successional Variation in the Soil Microbial Community in Odaesan National Park, Korea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis
TIEE Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology - Volume 1, January 2004 ISSUES – FIGURE SET Ecology of Disturbance Charlene D'Avanzo, School of Natural Sciences Hampshire College, Amherst, MA, 01002 [email protected] Controlled fire, © Konza Prairie LTER, Manhattan, KS {www.konza.ksu.edu/ gallery/hulbert.jpg} Figure Set 1: Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Purpose: To illustrate the intermediate disturbance hypothesis with 2 field experiments. Teaching Approach: "Pairs Share" Cognitive Skills: (see Bloom's Taxonomy) — comprehension, interpretation, application, analysis Student Assessment: Take home or in class essay quiz © 2004 – Charlene D’Avanzo and the Ecological Society of America. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, TIEE Volume 1 © 2004 - Ecological Society of America (www.tiee.ecoed.net). page 2 Charlene D’Avanzo TIEE Volume 1, January 2004 BACKGROUND W. Sousa (1979) In this study, Wayne Sousa tested the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposed by Connell (1978). In the 70's and 80's ecologists hotly debated factors explaining high diversity in tropical regions and bottom of the deep sea. Popular ideas included: the time hypothesis (older communities are more diverse), the competition hypothesis (in agreeable climates where biological and not physical factors prevail, interspecific competition and niche partitioning results in high diversity), and the environmental stability hypothesis (relatively unchanging physical variables allow more species to exist). Connell questioned all of these and reasoned instead that highest species diversity exists under conditions of intermediate disturbance. He proposed that in recently disturbed communities a few early colonizing species prevail; similarly after a long time diversity is also low, but these few are long-living and competitively dominant organisms. -
Identification of Beneficial and Detrimental Bacteria That Impact Sorghum Responses to Drought Using Multi-Scale and Multi-Syste
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.437608; this version posted April 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Identification of beneficial and detrimental bacteria that impact sorghum responses to drought using multi-scale and multi-system microbiome comparisons Mingsheng Qi1, Jeffrey C. Berry1, Kira Veley1, Lily O’Connor1, Omri M. Finkel2, 3, 4, Isai Salas- González2, 3, 5, Molly Kuhs1, Julietta Jupe1, Emily Holcomb1, Tijana Glavina del Rio 6, 7, Cody Creech8, Peng Liu9, Susannah Tringe6, 7, Jeffery L. Dangl2, 3, 5, 10, 11, 12, Daniel Schachtman8, 13, Rebecca S. Bart1* Affiliations 1. Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA 2. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 4. Present address: Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Life Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 5. Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 6. DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA 7. Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA 8. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scottsbluff, NE, USA 9. Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA 10. Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 11. -
Sphingomonas Sp. Cra20 Increases Plant Growth Rate and Alters Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure of Arabidopsis Thaliana Under Drought Stress
fmicb-10-01221 June 4, 2019 Time: 15:3 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 05 June 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01221 Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 Increases Plant Growth Rate and Alters Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure of Arabidopsis thaliana Under Drought Stress Yang Luo1, Fang Wang1, Yaolong Huang1, Meng Zhou1, Jiangli Gao1, Taozhe Yan1, Hongmei Sheng1* and Lizhe An1,2* 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2 The College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China The rhizosphere is colonized by a mass of microbes, including bacteria capable of Edited by: promoting plant growth that carry out complex interactions. Here, by using a sterile Camille Eichelberger Granada, experimental system, we demonstrate that Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 promotes the University of Taquari Valley, Brazil growth of Arabidopsis thaliana by driving developmental plasticity in the roots, thus Reviewed by: Muhammad Saleem, stimulating the growth of lateral roots and root hairs. By investigating the growth Alabama State University, dynamics of A. thaliana in soil with different water-content, we demonstrate that Cra20 United States Andrew Gloss, increases the growth rate of plants, but does not change the time of reproductive The University of Chicago, transition under well-water condition. The results further show that the application of United States Cra20 changes the rhizosphere indigenous bacterial community, which may be due *Correspondence: to the change in root structure. Our findings provide new insights into the complex Hongmei Sheng [email protected] mechanisms of plant and bacterial interactions. The ability to promote the growth of Lizhe An plants under water-deficit can contribute to the development of sustainable agriculture. -
Fine Spatial Scale Variation of Soil Microbial Communities Under European Beech and Norway Spruce
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 22 December 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02067 Fine Spatial Scale Variation of Soil Microbial Communities under European Beech and Norway Spruce Heiko Nacke 1 †*, Kezia Goldmann 2, 3 †, Ingo Schöning 4 †, Birgit Pfeiffer 1, Kristin Kaiser 1, Genis A. Castillo-Villamizar 1, Marion Schrumpf 4, François Buscot 2, 5, Rolf Daniel 1 and Tesfaye Wubet 2, 5 1 Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology and Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany, 2 Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle, Germany, 3 Department of Biology II, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 4 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, 5 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany The complex interactions between trees and soil microbes in forests as well as their inherent seasonal and spatial variations are poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed Edited by: the effects of major European tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies (L.) Tim Daniell, James Hutton Institute, UK Karst) on soil bacterial and fungal communities. Mineral soil samples were collected Reviewed by: from different depths (0–10, 10–20 cm) and at different horizontal distances from beech Christopher Blackwood, or spruce trunks (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 m) in early summer and autumn. We assessed Kent State University, USA the composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities based on 16S rRNA gene Richard S. Winder, Natural Resources Canada, Canada and ITS DNA sequences. Community composition of bacteria and fungi was most Christina Hazard, strongly affected by soil pH and tree species. -
Chapter 5 Species Interactions, Ecological Succession, and Population Control How Do Species Interact?
Chapter 5 Species interactions, Ecological Succession, and Population Control How do species interact? Give some limited resources that organisms need in order to survive. Food, shelter, space, mate to reproduce, water, light air How might species interact to get these limited resources? Competition Have you ever competed with another organism to get what you wanted/needed? Interspecific competition is between different species. Intraspecific competition is between a single species. Competition Species need to compete because their niches overlap and they end up sharing the limited resources. When the word “share” is used here, it doesn’t mean equal sharing. Species like to reduce or avoid competition, so they resource partition. Competition Resource partitioning is a way for organisms to share a resource by using the resource at different times or using different parts of the resource. Predator/Prey interactions Predator is the hunter and feeds on the prey (the hunted) This interaction has a strong effect on population sizes. Predator/Prey interactions pg 134- 135 Give a way predators capture their prey. What are some ways prey avoid predators? Birds of prey (predators) and prey Google search ‘Birds of Prey’ – the Nature Conservancy has a great site Google search ‘bluebird, robin, sparrow’ Answer: 1. What differences do you notice regarding placement of the eyes in each group? 2. How might the difference in eye placement benefit each group of birds? What is mimicry? • Mimicry is the similarity of one species to another species which protects one or both organisms. Can be in appearance, behavior, sound, scent and even location. Who are the players? Mimics can be good tasting (easy targets) so they need to gain protection by looking like something bad tasting or dangerous. -
(Antarctica) Glacial, Basal, and Accretion Ice
CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANISMS IN VOSTOK (ANTARCTICA) GLACIAL, BASAL, AND ACCRETION ICE Colby J. Gura A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2019 Committee: Scott O. Rogers, Advisor Helen Michaels Paul Morris © 2019 Colby Gura All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Scott O. Rogers, Advisor Chapter 1: Lake Vostok is named for the nearby Vostok Station located at 78°28’S, 106°48’E and at an elevation of 3,488 m. The lake is covered by a glacier that is approximately 4 km thick and comprised of 4 different types of ice: meteoric, basal, type 1 accretion ice, and type 2 accretion ice. Six samples were derived from the glacial, basal, and accretion ice of the 5G ice core (depths of 2,149 m; 3,501 m; 3,520 m; 3,540 m; 3,569 m; and 3,585 m) and prepared through several processes. The RNA and DNA were extracted from ultracentrifugally concentrated meltwater samples. From the extracted RNA, cDNA was synthesized so the samples could be further manipulated. Both the cDNA and the DNA were amplified through polymerase chain reaction. Ion Torrent primers were attached to the DNA and cDNA and then prepared to be sequenced. Following sequencing the sequences were analyzed using BLAST. Python and Biopython were then used to collect more data and organize the data for manual curation and analysis. Chapter 2: As a result of the glacier and its geographic location, Lake Vostok is an extreme and unique environment that is often compared to Jupiter’s ice-covered moon, Europa. -
Mechanism of Ecological Succession
Environmental Biology Prof.(Dr.) Punam Jeswal Head M.Sc semester IV Botany Department MECHANISM OF ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION Ecological succession is the gradual and continuous change in the species composition and community structure over time in the same area. Environment is always kept on changing over a period of time due to - i) Variations in climatic and physiographic factors and ii) The activities of the species of the communities themselves. These influences bring changes in the existing community which is sooner or later replaced by another community developed one after another. This process continues and successive communities develop one after another over the same area, until the terminal final community again becomes more or less stable for a period of time. The occurrence of definite sequence of communities over a period of time in the same area is known as Ecological Succession. Succession is a unidirectional progressive series of changes which leads to the established of a relatively stable community. Hult (1885), while studying communities of Southern Sweden used for the first time the term succession for the orderly changes in the communities. Clements (1907, 1916) put forth various principles that governed the process of succession, and while studying plant communities, defined succession as ' the natural process by which the same locality becomes successively colonized by different groups or communities of plants. According to E.P. Odum (1971), the ecological succession is an orderly process of community change in a unity area. It is the process of changes in species composition in an ecosystem over time. In simple terms, it is the process of ecosystem development in nature. -
A Noval Investigation of Microbiome from Vermicomposting Liquid Produced by Thai Earthworm, Perionyx Sp
International Journal of Agricultural Technology 2021Vol. 17(4):1363-1372 Available online http://www.ijat-aatsea.com ISSN 2630-0192 (Online) A novel investigation of microbiome from vermicomposting liquid produced by Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1 Kraisittipanit, R.1,2, Tancho, A.2,3, Aumtong, S.3 and Charerntantanakul, W.1* 1Program of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 2Natural Farming Research and Development Center, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 3Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Thailand. Kraisittipanit, R., Tancho, A., Aumtong, S. and Charerntantanakul, W. (2021). A noval investigation of microbiome from vermicomposting liquid produced by Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 17(4):1363-1372. Abstract The whole microbiota structure in vermicomposting liquid derived from Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1 was estimated. It showed high richness microbial species and belongs to 127 species, separated in 3 fungal phyla (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mucoromycota), 1 Actinomycetes and 16 bacterial phyla (Acidobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Balneolaeota, Candidatus, Chloroflexi, Deinococcus, Fibrobacteres, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadates, Ignavibacteriae, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes and Verrucomicrobia). The OTUs data analysis revealed the highest taxonomic abundant ratio in bacteria and fungi belong to Proteobacteria (70.20 %) and Ascomycota (5.96 %). The result confirmed that Perionyx sp. 1 -
Is Ecological Succession Predictable?
Is ecological succession predictable? Commissioned by Prof. dr. P. Opdam; Kennisbasis Thema 1. Project Ecosystem Predictability, Projectnr. 232317. 2 Alterra-Report 1277 Is ecological succession predictable? Theory and applications Koen Kramer Bert Brinkman Loek Kuiters Piet Verdonschot Alterra-Report 1277 Alterra, Wageningen, 2005 ABSTRACT Koen Kramer, Bert Brinkman, Loek Kuiters, Piet Verdonschot, 2005. Is ecological succession predictable? Theory and applications. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-Report 1277. 80 blz.; 6 figs.; 0 tables.; 197 refs. A literature study is presented on the predictability of ecological succession. Both equilibrium and nonequilibrium theories are discussed in relation to competition between, and co-existence of species. The consequences for conservation management are outlined and a research agenda is proposed focusing on a nonequilibrium view of ecosystem functioning. Applications are presented for freshwater-; marine-; dune- and forest ecosystems. Keywords: conservation management; competition; species co-existence; disturbance; ecological succession; equilibrium; nonequilibrium ISSN 1566-7197 This report can be ordered by paying € 15,- to bank account number 36 70 54 612 by name of Alterra Wageningen, IBAN number NL 83 RABO 036 70 54 612, Swift number RABO2u nl. Please refer to Alterra-Report 1277. This amount is including tax (where applicable) and handling costs. © 2005 Alterra P.O. Box 47; 6700 AA Wageningen; The Netherlands Phone: + 31 317 474700; fax: +31 317 419000; e-mail: [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system without the written permission of Alterra. Alterra assumes no liability for any losses resulting from the use of the research results or recommendations in this report. -
Early Successional Habitat
Early Successional Habitat January 2007 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 41 Introduction Change is a characteristic of all natural systems. Directional change in the make-up and appearance of natural communities over time is commonly known as ecological succession. This change begins with a dis- turbance to the existing community, followed by plant colonization or regrowth. Materials (snags, soils, and disturbance-adapted seeds and other organisms) that are left behind after a disruptive event serve as biolog- ical legacies; that is, potential reservoirs of life, facili- tating the recovery of the habitat and biological com- munity. Through complex interactions, the disturbances, cli- mate, and soils of an ecological site are reflected in NRCS a plant community that is unique to that site. In a Early successional habitats are highly dynamic, highly healthy ecosystem, the plant community is in a state productive seral stages with uniquely adapted animal of dynamic (or ever changing) equilibrium exhibiting communities. variability in species composition and successional stages following disturbance. This variability creates valuable wildlife habitat because different wildlife Early successional habitats form soon after a distur- species are adapted to different plant species and suc- bance. Early successional plants are generally her- cessional stages. Over evolutionary time, plants and baceous annuals and perennials that quickly occupy animals have developed traits that allow them to sur- disturbed sites. They reproduce seeds that are distur- vive, exploit, and even depend on disturbances. For bance adapted or can be widely dispersed by wind, example, some plants require fire to produce seeds or water, or animals. Early successional communities flowers, and some fish depend on regular flooding to are characterized by high productivity and provide create and maintain their streambed habitat. -
Impact of Cropping Systems, Soil Inoculum, and Plant Species Identity on Soil Bacterial Community Structure
Impact of Cropping Systems, Soil Inoculum, and Plant Species Identity on Soil Bacterial Community Structure Authors: Suzanne L. Ishaq, Stephen P. Johnson, Zach J. Miller, Erik A. Lehnhoff, Sarah Olivo, Carl J. Yeoman, and Fabian D. Menalled The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0861-2. Ishaq, Suzanne L. , Stephen P. Johnson, Zach J. Miller, Erik A. Lehnhoff, Sarah Olivo, Carl J. Yeoman, and Fabian D. Menalled. "Impact of Cropping Systems, Soil Inoculum, and Plant Species Identity on Soil Bacterial Community Structure." Microbial Ecology 73, no. 2 (February 2017): 417-434. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0861-2. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Impact of Cropping Systems, Soil Inoculum, and Plant Species Identity on Soil Bacterial Community Structure 1,2 & 2 & 3 & 4 & Suzanne L. Ishaq Stephen P. Johnson Zach J. Miller Erik A. Lehnhoff 1 1 2 Sarah Olivo & Carl J. Yeoman & Fabian D. Menalled 1 Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 172900, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 2 Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 3 Western Agriculture Research Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA 4 Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA Abstract Farming practices affect the soil microbial commu- then individual farm. Living inoculum-treated soil had greater nity, which in turn impacts crop growth and crop-weed inter- species richness and was more diverse than sterile inoculum- actions. -
Ecosystem Succession: Who/What Is Where and When
Ecosystem Succession: Who/What is Where and When Dennis Baldocchi ESPM Un ivers ity o f Ca liforn ia, Ber ke ley ESPM 111 Ecosystem Ecology Succession • From the Latin, succedere, to follow after • Orderly process of community development that is directional and predictable • Results from the modification of physical environment by the community – Succession is community-controlled even though the physical environment determines the pattern , rate of change and limits • Culminates in a stabilized ecosystem in which biomass and symbiotic function between organisms are maintained per unity of available energy flow – Eugene P Odum, 1969, Science ESPM 111 Ecosystem Ecology Succession • Primary Succession – After severe disturbance that remove or bury products of the ecosystem • Secondary Succession – After disturbance on a vegetated site. Most above ground live biomass may be disturbed but soil organic matter and plant propagules remain • Gap Phase Succession – Mortality and Tree fall for gap in canopy for new vegetation to invade and establish itself ESPM 111 Ecosystem Ecology Dynamic Sequence of Vegetation • Initial Conditions – Equilibrium • Disturbance • Colonization/Recruitment • Recovery • Competition • Succession – Primary – Secondary – Gap Succession • Climax – New Eq uilibri u m ESPM 111 Ecosystem Ecology Disturbance • Relativelyyp Discrete event, in time and space, that alters the structure of populations, communities and ecosystems and causes changes in resource availability and the ppyhysical environment. Chapin et al. ESPM 111