World Co-Operative Monitor Report 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Coop Extra Coop Obs!
Års- og samfunnsrapport 2010 Års- og samfunns- rapport 2010 Det handler om verdier Innhold Nøkkeltall 1 2010 i kortform 2–3 Coops organisasjon 2–3 Administrerende direktør har ordet 4 Coop og samfunnet 6 Coop og produktene 12 Coop og medarbeiderne 20 Coop og kundene 28 Coop og miljøet 34 Coop og virksomheten 42 Coop Norge Handel AS 44 Coop Norge Handel Faghandel 48 Coop Norge Industri AS 50 Kjedepresentasjon 52 Smart Club AS 57 Coop Norge Eiendom AS 58 Styrets beretning 60 Regnskap og noter 70 GRI indikatorer 99 Firmainformasjon og adresser 102 KRISTINE DOBBE coop medlem nr: 600571 1354 834712 Nøkkeltall Store strukturelle endringer i Coop Norge SA konsern for årene 2007 og 2008 har påvirket regnskapstallene i vesentlig grad for disse årene. Finansielle nøkkeltall for Coop Norge SA 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Tall i millioner kroner Totale driftsinntekter 29 288 28 662 26 879 23 506 21 536 Driftsresultat før finansposter 301 156 (438) (374) 41 Ordinært resultat før skatt 280 131 (278) 2 462 122 Årsresultat (majoritet) 228 85 (158) 2 592 111 Kapital Totalkapital 13 117 11 980 12 119 11 108 7 265 Egenkapital, inkl minoritetsinteresser 4 847 4 611 4 624 4 601 2 100 Egenkapitalandel 37 % 38 % 38 % 41 % 29 % Lønnsomhet Driftsmargin før finansposter 1,0 % 0,5 % -1,6 % -1,6 % 0,2 % Driftsmargin 1,0 % 0,4 % -1,0 % 10,5 % 0,6 % Resultatgrad 0,8 % 0,3 % -0,6 % 11,0 % 0,5 % Gjennomsnitt antall årsverk i 2 267 2 449 2 254 1 767 57 Coop Norge SA Konsern Tall på medlemmer i samvirkelagene 1 257 139 1 208 667 1 163 040 1 111 719 1 063 365 Tall på samvirkelag 127 133 137 146 162 Strukturelle endringer mens virksomheten ble lagt inn i et eget selskap, Frem til 31.12.2007 eide Coop Norge SA 20 prosent av Smart Club AS. -
Exporter Guide Norway
THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/1/2018 GAIN Report Number: NL8008 Norway Post: The Hague Exporter Guide Report Categories: Beverages Dried Fruit Exporter Guide Fishery Products Raisins Retail Foods Snack Foods SP1 - Expand International Marketing Opportunities Special Certification - Organic/Kosher/Halal Tree Nuts Wine Approved By: Susan Phillips Prepared By: Marcel Pinckaers Report Highlights: This exporter guide provides practical tips for U.S. exporters on how to conduct business in Norway. Although a small market, Norway relies heavily on imports. There are export opportunities for U.S. exporters of specialty foods, wine, craft beer, seafood, tree nuts, food preparations and dried fruit. Especially well-known brands and products from the United States fare well in this affluent market. Introduction Norway is located in Northern Europe and is a part of the Scandinavian Peninsula. The majority of the country shares a border to the east with Sweden while its northernmost region is bordered by Finland to the south and Russia to the east. Norway's extensive coastline is facing the North Atlantic Ocean and the Barents Sea. Map of Northwest Europe With 324 thousand square kilometers, Norway belongs to the top ten largest countries in Europe. Norway is also one of the most sparsely populated countries in Europe and has a coastline ten times its length. Norway’s population is 5.2 million and the vast majority live in urban areas. Almost one million people live in its capital Oslo. -
The Governance of Large Co-Operative Businesses
The Governance of Large Co-operative Businesses A research study by Professor Johnston Birchall 2 The governance of large co-operative businesses This is the second edition, comprehensively revised, of a research study which has been widely recognised as the first comprehensive research study into how co-operative businesses worldwide operate in terms of their governance. The opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the formal policy of Co-operatives UK. Contents Summary 3 Glossary of terms used in the report 6 Introduction 9 1. Is there a problem of governance in co-operatives? 13 2. A theory of co-operative governance 25 3. The agriculture and food industries sector 41 4. The wholesale and retail sector 52 5. The industry and utilities sector 62 6. The health and social care sector 69 7. The banking and financial services 79 8. The insurance sector 89 9. Findings 98 10. Conclusion: design for good governance 102 Bibliography 108 Endnotes 112 3 The governance of large co-operative businesses Summary Core to the identity of the co-operative form of businesses is the claim that it can be clearly distinguished from investor-owned enterprise through its member ownership and governance. How this distinction works in practice, however, has been less clear. Focusing on the world’s largest co-operatives, the first edition of this research study set out to fill gaps in our knowledge. Since its publication in 2014, a focus on governance in co-operatives has been evident in many countries, reinforcing the value and relevance of a return to this research in a comprehensively revised second edition. -
Samvirkebeskatningen I Norge På 1900-Tallet
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen av Harald Espeli Forskningsrapport 2/2003 Handelshøyskolen BI Institutt for innovasjon og økonomisk organisering Senter for samvirkeforskning Harald Espeli: Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet. En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen. Harald Espeli 2003 Forskningsrapport 2/2003 ISSN: 0803-2610 Handelshøyskolen BI P.b. 580 1302 Sandvika Tlf: 67 55 70 00 www.bi.no Rapporten kan bestilles fra: Norli, avd. Sandvika Telefon: +47 67 55 74 51 Fax: +47 67 55 74 50 Mail: [email protected] 2 Sammendrag og forord Utfra en historiefaglig synsvinkel beskriver og analyserer rapporten utvik- lingen av norsk samvirkebeskatning fra slutten av 1800-tallet og frem til en høyesterettsdom i 2001. Skattelovene av 1911 innebar at samvirkeforetak innen jordbrukssektoren og forbruksforeninger (kooperasjonen) ble under- lagt et særskilt skatteregime frem til skattereformen i 1992. Skatteregimet ble utvidet til fiskerisamvirke i 1931 og salgssamvirke i skogbruket i 1949. Skatteregimet innebar at samvirkeforetak innenfor disse sektorer ble prosent- lignet, ikke regnskapslignet som andre foretak. Prosentligningen innebar at skattbar inntekt ble fastsatt til en viss andel av samvirkeforetakets skattbare formue. Den særskilte skattleggingen av samvirke var motivert utfra et politisk ønske om å fremme organisasjonsformen innenfor utvalgte deler av økonomien på begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Samtidig erkjente politikerne at ordinær regn- skapsligning ikke uten videre kunne benytte i skattleggingen av samvirke- foretak på grunn av organisasjonsformens særpreg. -
Norway Legal Framework Analysis Report.Pdf
LEGAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS NATIONAL REPORT: NORWAY ICA-EU PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 II. National cooperative law: Norway ............................................................................ 4 i. General Context..................................................................................................... 4 ii. Specific elements of the cooperative law .............................................................. 5 a) Definition and objectives of cooperatives......................................................... 5 b) Establishment, cooperative membership and governance ............................ 11 c) Cooperative financial structure and taxation .................................................. 14 iii. Other specific features......................................................................................... 18 d) Cooperative internal and external control and cooperation among cooperatives 18 III. Degree of “cooperative friendliness” of the national legislation ...................... 19 IV. Recommendations for the improvement of the national legal framework ...... 23 V. Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 23 National Expert: Julie Nåvik Hval 2 I. Introduction The research falls within the scope of the knowledge-building activities undertaken within the partnership for international development -
International Finance and Tax Avoidance Via Dutch Special Purpose Entities
International finance and tax avoidance via Dutch Special Purpose Entities Francis Weyzig ([email protected]) Paper for presentation at research , seminar Radboud University Nijmegen, 21 October 2013 Abstract Many large firms use Dutch Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) to avoid corporate taxes. This paper shows that Dutch SPEs mainly pass on equity and loans to foreign affiliates, sometimes combined with debt issuance. These structures facilitate avoidance of withholding taxes, particularly in specific developing and EU countries, including Indonesia, the Philippines, Ghana, Mongolia, Portugal, and Spain. Dutch SPEs also facilitate profit shifting through royalty payments. Tax avoidance via SPE structures has major implications for international tax policy. Countries could respond by adjusting withholding taxes unilaterally, improving anti-avoidance measures, or renegotiating certain tax treaties. Introduction Developing countries require sustainable sources of finance for development. Most countries will need to increase domestic tax revenues to gradually replace aid and debt as sources of finance for public goods and services (OECD & AfDB, 2010; UNCTAD, 2010). For low income countries, this need is often reinforced by the loss of tariff revenues due to trade liberalisation (Braunsgaard & Keen, 2005; Khattry & Mohan Rao, 2002). In the EU, raising tax revenues is a priority as well, but for different reasons. Various EU countries are faced with unsustainable fiscal deficits, because their public debt and borrowing costs increased sharply as a consequence of the financial crisis. In developing countries, donor support to strengthen tax systems mainly addresses domestic constraints, such as administrative capacity (OECD, 2012b). However, international constraints are important as well. These include illicit capital flight and evasion of personal income tax on assets held offshore (Ndikumana & Boyce, 2008; UNCTAD, 2010) and transfer pricing abuses and international tax arbitrage by multinationals (Lesage et al., 2010; OECD & AfDB, 2010). -
Exploring the Co-Operative Economy Report 2017
EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2017 REPORT 2017 EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY www.monitor.coop Titolo capitolo 1 THE WORLD CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR IS AN ALLIANCE INITIATIVE WITH THE SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT OF EURICSE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF OUR ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS FOR INFORMATION CONTACT www.monitor.coop [email protected] THE 2017 WORLD Charles Gould CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR Gianluca Salvatori EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY Welcome to the sixth annual World Co-operative Monitor not seem to reflect the co-operative movement as a whole but report produced in partnership by the International Co-oper- more likely specific economic conditions. ative Alliance (the Alliance) and the European Research Insti- Another addition to this year’s report is the analysis of the tute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse). As we do capital structure of not only the Top 300 but also a sample each year, with this publication we report on the world’s largest of smaller co-operatives and mutuals, allowing for compari- co-operative and mutual organizations, providing a ranking of son of different types of co-operative businesses. The results the Top 300 and sectorial analysis based on 2015 financial data. of this research show that large co-operatives and mutuals In addition to the rankings based on US Dollar, we have do not have specific problems raising capital related to the added rankings using the International Dollar as calculated by co-operative business model, though smaller co-opera- the World Bank. The rankings using this measure replace the tives do have some challenges mostly related to obtaining rankings based on turnover over GDP per capita and aim to internal capital and long-term debt. -
Coop Norge Handel AS - ICA Norge AS - Konkurranseloven § 16, Jf
Offentlig versjon Unntatt offentlighet jfr offl § 13, fvl § 13.1.2 Offentlighet Deres ref.: Vår ref.: 2014/0373-417 Saksbehandler: Astrid Boge Dato: 04.03.2015 Saksansvarlig: Magnus Gabrielsen Vedtak V2015-24 - Coop Norge Handel AS - ICA Norge AS - konkurranseloven § 16, jf. § 20 - inngrep mot foretakssammenslutning - vilkår (1) Konkurransetilsynet viser til melding om foretakssammenslutning ("meldingen") mottatt 5. november 2014, tilsynets varsel 8. desember 2014 om at inngrep mot foretakssammenslutningen kan bli aktuelt, samt melders endelige forslag til avhjelpende tiltak 3. mars 2015. Videre vises det til øvrig skriftlig korrespondanse og annen kontakt i anledning saken. (2) Konkurransetilsynet har kommet til at foretakssammenslutningen mellom Coop Norge Handel AS ("Coop") og Ica Norge AS ("Ica") kan føre til eller forsterke en vesentlig begrensning av konkurransen i dagligvaremarkedet. (3) Melder har fremsatt forslag til avhjelpende tiltak, og Konkurransetilsynet har funnet at de avhjelpende tiltakene vil avbøte de konkurransebegrensende virkningene som foretakssammenslutningen kan føre til. Konkurransetilsynet har på denne bakgrunn fattet vedtak om inngrep hvor foretakssammenslutningen tillates på vilkår, jf. konkurranseloven1 § 16 annet ledd jf. § 20 fjerde ledd. 1 Innledning 1.1 Sakens bakgrunn (4) Saken gjelder foretakssammenslutning mellom Coop og Ica, også omtalt som "partene". (5) I henhold til aksjekjøpsavtale inngått 3. oktober 2014 mellom Coop og Ica Detalj AB skal Coop erverve samtlige aksjer i Ica. 1.2 Konkurransetilsynets saksbehandling (6) Konkurransetilsynet har i anledning saken innhentet omfattende informasjon fra en rekke aktører i markedet, herunder partene og deres konkurrenter. 1 Lov 5. mars 2004 nr. 12 om konkurranse mellom foretak og kontroll med foretakssammenslutninger. 2 (7) Partene har utover melding datert 31. -
Grønn Butikk? Miljø- Og Etikkvurdering Av Dagligvarebransjen
FRAMTIDEN I VÅRE HENDER RAPPORT 2/2014 Grønn butikk? Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen Av John Hille Tittel Grønn butikk? Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen Forfatter John Hille Utgivelse 2/2014 Utgiver Framtiden i våre hender, Fredensborgveien 24 G, 0177 Oslo Ansvarlig redaktør Arild Hermstad Prosjektstyrer Håkon Lindahl Faglig kvalitetssikrer Tormod Lien, Stiftelsen Miljømerking Styreansvarlig Ida Dokk Smith Forsidefoto iStockphoto Det oppfordres til å sitere og bruke opplysninger fra denne rapporten. Framtiden i våre hender oppgis som kilde. Denne rapporten ble godkjent av Framtiden i våre henders forskningsinstitutt den 17. juni 2014. Instituttet har til formål å engasjere eksterne fagfolk med den nødvendige vitenskapelige kompetanse til å utføre prosjekter innen miljø- og utviklingsspørsmål. Prosjektene skal frambringe vitenskapelige utredninger som skal publiseres i Framtiden i våre henders rapportserie og legges ut til offentlig debatt. Rapportene kvalitetssikres og godkjennes av instituttets styre, som består av: Pål Strandbakken Eva Langslet Jørn Stave Thomas Cottis Ida Dokk Smith Steffen Kallbekken Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE SAMMENDRAG ........................................................................................................................................... 3 INNLEDNING ............................................................................................................................................... 5 METODE ...................................................................................................................................................... -
GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network
Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network Voluntary Report - public distribution Date: 7/20/2001 GAIN Report #SW1013 Sweden Retail Food Sector Food Retail Cooperatives in the Nordics Merge 2001 Approved by: Lana Bennett U.S. Embassy, Stockholm Prepared by: Bjorn Engstrom Report Highlights: One of the largest Nordic retailers has just been formed by the merger of Swedish KF, Danish FDB and Coop Norway. Coop Norden, as it will be called, is estimated to have a turnover of U.S. $ 8 billion. Headquarters will be located in Gothenburg, Sweden and the company launch is scheduled for January 1, 2002. The company plans to form new, unified marketing concepts and is seeking new products. Includes PSD changes: No Includes Trade Matrix: No Unscheduled Report Stockholm [SW1], SW GAIN Report #SW1013 Page 1 of 1 One of the largest Nordic retailers has just been formed by the merger of Swedish Kooperativa Forbundet (KF), Danish Faellesforeningen for Danmarks Brugsforeninger (FDB) and Coop Norway. It will be named Coop Norden and is estimated to have a turnover of 80 billion SEK (roughly U.S. $8 billion), a 29% market share and 26,000 employees. Coop Norden’s headquarters will be located in Gothenburg, Sweden and the company launch is scheduled for January 1, 2002. "Our vision is that Coop Norden will be the leading and most innovative retailer in the Nordics with a consumer cooperative identity," Roland Svensson of KF Sweden said. What prompted the merger was the recent increase in competition from large international chains and the pace of changes in the industry. -
2021 Business Economic Outlook
FIFTY-SIXTH ANNUAL COLORADO BUSINESS ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 2021 Additional copies may be ordered from: Business Research Division University of Colorado Boulder 420 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0420 colorado.edu/business/brd ISBN 978-0-89478-034-9 Copyright 2020 by the Business Research Division Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0420 The University of Colorado Boulder is an equal opportunity/nondiscrimination institution. Information in this book is correct at the time of printing but may be subject to change. Material contained within the accompanying tables is in the public domain and, with appropriate credit, may be reproduced without permission. Please reference, “Business Research Division, Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado Boulder.” Printed on recycled paper. Leeds School of Business Corporate Partners ANGEL INVESTORS PRINCIPAL INVESTORS LEAD INVESTORS PROGRAM INVESTORS Table of Contents Leeds School of Business .................................................................................................... 2 Other Services ...................................................................................................... 122 Introduction ... ...................................................................................................................... 3 Government .......................................................................................................... 124 Colorado Then and Now ................................................................................................... -
Korea - Republic Of
THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 8/16/2018 GAIN Report Number: KS1829 Korea - Republic of Retail Foods 2018 Approved By: Lynne Larrabee, ATO Director Prepared By: Sangyong Oh, Marketing Specialist Report Highlights: Strong consumer demand for value, quality, convenience, and diversity generates increased demand for imported agricultural products in the Korean retail sector. The United States remains the leading supplier of consumer-oriented agricultural products to the Korean retail sector. Korea’s imports of consumer-oriented agricultural products from the United States amounted to a record $4.3 billion in 2017. Post: Seoul ATO Market Fact Sheet: South Korea Executive Summary Quick Facts CY 2017 South Korea is the 11th largest economy in the world with a national GDP of $1.53 trillion Imports of Ag. Products from the World and a per capita GNI of almost $30,000 as of 2017. It is about the size of the state of - Basic Products US $4.9 billion Indiana and has a population of 51 million. Over 90% of Koreans live in urban areas. - Intermediate Products US $7.9 billion Korean consumers maintain strong demand for healthy diets, diversified choices, and new - Consumer-Oriented Products US $12.8 billion tastes. The country relies heavily on imports to fulfill total demand. Korea is the fifth - Forest Products US $3.2 billion largest export market for American agriculture. The United States was the leading supplier - Seafood Products US $5.0 billion of imported agricultural products to Korea by accounting for $7.9 billion or 23.5% of - Total US $33.8 billion Korea's total agricultural imports of $33.8 billion in 2017.