DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Mechanics L4 by Dr. P. A. Ganai

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Mechanics L4 by Dr. P. A. Ganai Lecture 04 finite Square Well Introduction of Quantum Mechanics : Dr Prince A Ganai 6-1 The Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension 235 which can also be written as Ct Ct Ct Ct t eiCt cos i sin cos 2 i sin 2 6-17b h h Thus, we see that (t), which describes the time variation of (x, t), is an oscillatory 6-1 The Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension 235 function with frequency f C h. However, according to the de Broglie relation (Equation 5-1), the frequency of the wave represented by (x, t) is f E h; there- whifcohr eca, nw ael scoo bnec lwurdiett etnh aats the separation constant C E, the total energy of the particle, and we have Ct Ct Ct Ct t eiCt cos i sin cos 2 i sin 2 6-17b h h t eiEt 6-17c Thus, we see that (t), which describes the time variation of (x, t), is an oscillatory funcftoiro na llw siothlu ftrieoqnuse tnoc yE qfuatioCn h6.- 6H ionwvoevlveirn, ga ctcimored-iinngd etop etnhde ednet pBortoegnltiiea lrse.l aEtiqouna tion 6-14 236 Chapter 6 The Schrödinger Equation (Eqtuhaetino nb e5c-o1)m, ethse, ofrne qmuuenltcipy loicfa tthioe nw bayv e r(exp)r,esented by (x, t) is f E h; there- fore, we conclude that the separation constant C E, the total energy of the particle, and we have 2 2 If either (dx) orx d dx were not finite or not single valued, the same would be 2 V x x E x 6-18 true of (x,2 tm) andd xd dxi.E tA s we will see shortly, the predictions of wave mechanics t e 6-17c regarding the results of measurements involve both of those quantities and would thus SeparationEquation 6- 1of8 ithes re fTimeerred tando as tSpacehe time Dependencies-independent Sc hofrö dinger equation. for all solutions ntoo Et qnuaetcioens s6a-r6i linyv oplrveindgi ctitm fei-ninitdee poenr dednetf pinotieten tiψvala(sxl. u,Eetq)su aftioorn 6re-1a4l physical quantities. Such then becoTmhee st,i mone m-inudlteippleicnadtieonnt bSyc hr(öx)d,inger equation in one dimension is an ordinary dif- ferential equreastiuolnts iwn oounled vnaorita bbele a cx caenpdt aibs leth seirnecfoer me meauscuhr aebalsei eqru taon thiatinedsl,e s uthcahn atsh ea ngular momentum 2 general forman odf pEoqsuita2itoidonn, a6xr-e6 . nTehvee rn oinrmfinaliitzea toior nm cuolntidpitlieo nv aolfu eEdq.u Aati ofinn a6l- 9r ecsatnri cbtei on on the form of V x x E x 6-18 expressed inth tee rwmasv2 omef f uthndecx t2imone -in(dxe)p iesn tdheantt in (ox)r,d esirn tcoe othbee yti mthee dneopremndaelinzcaet ioofn tchoe ndition, (x) must absolute squaaprpe roofa tchhe wzearvoe fsuunfcftiicoine nctalnyc eflass. tW aes hxave so that normalization is preserved. For Equation 6-18 is referred to as the time-independent Schrödinger{ equation. future reference, we may su imEt m arize tihEte conditions that the wave function (x) must The time-independxe, tnt Schxr,ö tdinger equaxtioen in one xdimeension is an oxrdinarxy d if- 6-19 ferential equatiomn eine to inne ovradriearb lteo x b aen da cics etphetarebfloer ea ms ufochll oeawsise:r to handle than the genaernadl Efoqruma toiof nE q6u-9at itohne n6 -b6e.c Tohmee nsormalization condition of Equation 6-9 can be expressed in term1s .o f t(hxe) tmimues-tin edxeipsetn adnendt sa(txi)s, fsyi ntchee tShec htirmöed idnegpeenr deeqnucea toiof nth.e x x dx 1 6-20 absolute square of2 t.h e w(xav) ea fnudn cdtion dcaxn cmeluss. tW bee h caoventinuous. iEt iEt x3, .t (xx), tand d xdxe must bxe feinite. x x 6-19 andConditions Equation 6-9 t4h.e n b( exforc)o amne dAcceptables d dx must be s Waveingle val uFunctionsed. The form of t5h.e w(axv)e fun0c tfiaosnt en(xo)u tghha ta ssa xtisfies Eq usaot itohna t6 t-h1e8 ndoerpmenadlisz oanti othne i nfotermgr al, Equation 6-20, x x dx 1 { 6-20 of the potential reenmeragiyn sfu bnocutinodn eVd(.x). In the next few sections we will study some Introductionsimple bu oft iQuantummporta nMechanicst problem : sDr i nPrince whic Ah Ganai V(x) is specified. Our example potentials will Conditionsbe approxima tforions tAcceptableo real physical po tWaveentials, sFunctionsimplified to make calculations easier. In some cases, the slope of the potential energy may be discontinuous, for example, The form of the wQuestionsave function (x) that satisfies Equation 6-18 depends on the form of tVhe( xp)o mtenatyia lh aevner goyn efu fnocrtimon inV (ox)n. eI nr etgheio nne xotf fsepwa csee ctainodns awnoe twheilrl fsoturdmy isno maen adjacent region. (This is a useful mathematical approximation to real situations in which V(x) simple but importa1n.t pLriokbele tmhse i nc lwashsicihc aVl( xw) aisv sep ecqiufiaedti.o Onu, rt ehxea mScphler öpodtienngtiealrs ewqiulla tion is linear. Why is this be avpaprrioexs imraaptiiodnlys toov reera l ap hsymsiaclal l rpeogtieonnti aolsf, sspimacpeli,f iseudc tho masa kaet ctahlec usluatrifoancse ebasoiuern. dary of a In smometea lc.a)s Tesh, et hper oscloeimpdeup rooef rittnha ens upt?cohte nctaisael se nise rtgoy s omlavye bthee d Siscchornötidniunoguesr, efqoru aetxiaomn psleep, arately in V(x)e amchay r ehgaivoen oon2fe .s pfToarhcme raienn idos ntnheo ern ef gariecoqtnou rior ife sthpaact et hae1n dso 1alun2 otiitnohn eEsr qjfoouiranmt i soimnn o a6on-t 1hal8dy.j aaDcte otnhete s pthoiisn tm oef an that (x) must regidoins.c (oTnhtisn uisi tay .usefbuel mreaathl?ematical approximation to real situations in which V(x) varies raSpiindclye otvheer par osmbaablli lrietyg ioonf ofifn sdpiancge , as upcahr taicsl ea t ctahnen soutr fvaacery b oduisncdoanryti nouf oau sly from metpalo.)i nTth teo p proociend3t,u. rtehW ein h wsyua cvmhe u cfasusten tsch tieiso tenol esoc(ltxvr)ei c tm hfeuie sSltcd hb reö( dxcio,n tng)te ibrn eeu qorueuaast.li9o? n SI sine ipctae pr atohteselsy iS bicnlh er töod ifningedr a nonreal wave eache qreugaitoionn o ifn svpoalcvee fasun tdnh cetht sieoencn ro etnqhdua idtr ees ratihtvaiast tftiihveees sdtoh2luet icodlnxass2 sjoicina ls mw, otaohvtehe lf yier qsattu dtaheteir oipvnoa?itnitv eo f (which disciosn tthineu istylo.pe) 4m. uDste aslcsroi bbee h coownt itnhueo dues ;B throatg liise, hthyep ogrtahpehs iso fe nt(exr)s vinertsou tsh xe mScuhsrt öbdei nger wave sSminocoet ht.h (eI np rao sbpaebciliiatyl coafs ef iinnd winhg icah p tahreti cploet ecnatninaol te nvearrgyy d biseccoonmtineus oinusfilyn itfero, mth is restric- point to point, the waevqeu fautniocntio. n (x) must be continuous.9 Since the Schrödinger tion is relaxed. Since no particle can have infinite potential energy, (x) must be zero equation involves 5th. eW sechoantd w doeruivldat ibvee tdh2e edfxfe2 ct on ,t thhee fSircsht rdöedriivnagtievre eq u(wathiiocnh of adding a constant rest is thine rselogpioe)n sm wusht earles oV (bxe) cios nitninfiunoiutes.; Tthhaet ni sa, tt hthe eg braopuhn doaf ry( xo)f vseurcshu sa xr emguiostn ,b e may be discontinuous.) energy for a particle with mass to the total energy E in the de Broglie relation smooth. (In a special cfase inE whhi?ch the potential energy becomes infinite, this restric- tion is relaxed. Since no particle can have infinite potential energy, (x) must be zero in regions where V6(. x)D ies sincfriinbitee .i nT hweno radt sth we bhoautn idsa rmy eoaf nsut cbhy a nroegrimona,l iza mtiaoyn b oe f the wave function. discontinuous.) TIPLER_06_229-276hr.indd 235 EXAMPLE 6-1 A Solution to the Schrödinger Equation Show that for a free 8/22/11 11:57 AM particle of mass m moving in one dimension the function (x) A sin kx B cos kx is a solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation for any values of the TIPLER_06_229-276hr.indd 235 8/22/11 11:57 AM constants A and B. SOLUTION A free particle has no net force acting on it, for example, V(x) 0, in which case the kinetic energy equals the total energy. Thus, p k 2mE 1 2. Differentiat- ing (x) gives d kA cos kx kB sin kx dx TIPLER_06_229-276hr.indd 236 8/22/11 11:57 AM 6-2 The Infinite Square Well 237 and differentiating again, d2 k2A sin kx k2B cos kx dx 2 k2 A sin kx B cos kx k2 x Substituting into Equation 6-18, 2 k2 A sin kx B cos kx E A sin kx B cos kx 2m 2k2 x E x 2m and, since 2k2 2mE, we have E x E x and the given (x) is a solution of Equation 6-18. 6-2 The Infinite Square Well A problem that provides several illustrations of the properties of wave functions and is also one of the easiest problems to solve using the time-independent, one- dimensional Schrödinger equation is that of the infinite-square well, sometimes called the particle in a box. A macroscopic example is a bead free to move on a frictionless wire between two massive stops clamped to the wire. We could also build such a “box” for an electron using electrodes and grids in an evacuated tube as illustrated in Infinite potentialFi gwellure 6-1a. The walls of the box are provided by the increasing potential between the grids G and the electrode C as shown in Figures 6-1b and c. The walls can be (a ) Electron – C G G C – Classical Picture FIGURE 6-1 (a) The electron V V placed between the two sets of electrodes C and grids G (b) Quantum Mechanical Realisation experiences no force in the region between the grids, Potential which are at ground potential.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Mechanics
    Quantum Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Intendedaudience................................ 5 1.2 MajorSources .................................. 5 1.3 AimofCourse .................................. 6 1.4 OutlineofCourse ................................ 6 2 Probability Theory 7 2.1 Introduction ................................... 7 2.2 WhatisProbability?.............................. 7 2.3 CombiningProbabilities. ... 7 2.4 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation . ..... 9 2.5 ContinuousProbabilityDistributions. ........ 11 3 Wave-Particle Duality 13 3.1 Introduction ................................... 13 3.2 Wavefunctions.................................. 13 3.3 PlaneWaves ................................... 14 3.4 RepresentationofWavesviaComplexFunctions . ....... 15 3.5 ClassicalLightWaves ............................. 18 3.6 PhotoelectricEffect ............................. 19 3.7 QuantumTheoryofLight. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 3.8 ClassicalInterferenceofLightWaves . ...... 21 3.9 QuantumInterferenceofLight . 22 3.10 ClassicalParticles . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 3.11 QuantumParticles............................... 25 3.12 WavePackets .................................. 26 2 QUANTUM MECHANICS 3.13 EvolutionofWavePackets . 29 3.14 Heisenberg’sUncertaintyPrinciple . ........ 32 3.15 Schr¨odinger’sEquation . 35 3.16 CollapseoftheWaveFunction . 36 4 Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics 39 4.1 Introduction ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Polarizability in the Three Dimensional Problem and the Solution of an Inhomogeneous Differential Equation
    Electric polarizability in the three dimensional problem and the solution of an inhomogeneous differential equation M. A. Maizea) and J. J. Smetankab) Department of Physics, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 15650 USA In previous publications, we illustrated the effectiveness of the method of the inhomogeneous differential equation in calculating the electric polarizability in the one-dimensional problem. In this paper, we extend our effort to apply the method to the three-dimensional problem. We calculate the energy shift of a quantum level using second-order perturbation theory. The energy shift is then used to calculate the electric polarizability due to the interaction between a static electric field and a charged particle moving under the influence of a spherical delta potential. No explicit use of the continuum states is necessary to derive our results. I. INTRODUCTION In previous work1-3, we employed the simple and elegant method of the inhomogeneous differential equation4 to calculate the energy shift of a quantum level in second-order perturbation theory. The energy shift was a result of an interaction between an applied static electric field and a charged particle moving under the influence of a one-dimensional bound 1 potential. The electric polarizability, , was obtained using the basic relationship ∆퐸 = 휖2 0 2 with ∆퐸0 being the energy shift and is the magnitude of the applied electric field. The method of the inhomogeneous differential equation devised by Dalgarno and Lewis4 and discussed by Schwartz5 can be used in a large variety of problems as a clever replacement for conventional perturbation methods. As we learn in our introductory courses in quantum mechanics, calculating the energy shift in second-order perturbation using conventional methods involves a sum (which can be infinite) or an integral that contains all possible states allowed by the transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Double Dirac Delta Potential
    Revisiting double Dirac delta potential Zafar Ahmed1, Sachin Kumar2, Mayank Sharma3, Vibhu Sharma3;4 1Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India 2Theoretical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India 3;4Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, UP, 201313, India∗ (Dated: June 14, 2016) Abstract We study a general double Dirac delta potential to show that this is the simplest yet versatile solvable potential to introduce double wells, avoided crossings, resonances and perfect transmission (T = 1). Perfect transmission energies turn out to be the critical property of symmetric and anti- symmetric cases wherein these discrete energies are found to correspond to the eigenvalues of Dirac delta potential placed symmetrically between two rigid walls. For well(s) or barrier(s), perfect transmission [or zero reflectivity, R(E)] at energy E = 0 is non-intuitive. However, earlier this has been found and called \threshold anomaly". Here we show that it is a critical phenomenon and we can have 0 ≤ R(0) < 1 when the parameters of the double delta potential satisfy an interesting condition. We also invoke zero-energy and zero curvature eigenstate ( (x) = Ax + B) of delta well between two symmetric rigid walls for R(0) = 0. We resolve that the resonant energies and the perfect transmission energies are different and they arise differently. arXiv:1603.07726v4 [quant-ph] 13 Jun 2016 ∗Electronic address: 1:[email protected], 2: [email protected], 3: [email protected], 4:[email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The general one-dimensional Double Dirac Delta Potential (DDDP) is written as [see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Table: Various One Dimensional Potentials System Physical Potential Total Energies and Probability Density Significant Feature Correspondence Free Particle I.E
    Chapter 2 (Lecture 4-6) Schrodinger equation for some simple systems Table: Various one dimensional potentials System Physical Potential Total Energies and Probability density Significant feature correspondence Free particle i.e. Wave properties of Zero Potential Proton beam particle Molecule Infinite Potential Well Approximation of Infinite square confined to box finite well well potential 8 6 4 2 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 x Conduction Potential Barrier Penetration of Step Potential 4 electron near excluded region (E<V) surface of metal 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Neutron trying to Potential Barrier Partial reflection at Step potential escape nucleus 5 potential discontinuity (E>V) 4 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Α particle trying Potential Barrier Tunneling Barrier potential to escape 4 (E<V) Coulomb barrier 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x 1 Electron Potential Barrier No reflection at Barrier potential 5 scattering from certain energies (E>V) negatively 4 ionized atom 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Neutron bound in Finite Potential Well Energy quantization Finite square well the nucleus potential 4 3 2 1 0 2 0 2 4 6 x Aromatic Degenerate quantum Particle in a ring compounds states contains atomic rings. Model the Quantization of energy Particle in a nucleus with a and degeneracy of spherical well potential which is or states zero inside the V=0 nuclear radius and infinite outside that radius.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON PLAN B.Sc
    DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY LESSON PLAN B.Sc. – THIRD YEAR (2015-2016 REGULATION) FIFTH SEMESTER . SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES SRM NAGAR, KATTANKULATHUR – 603 203 SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Third Year B.Sc Physics (2015-2016 Regulation) Course Code: UPY15501 Course Title: Quantum Mechanics Semester: V Course Time: JUL 2016 – DEC 2017 Location: S.R.M. UNIVERSITY OBJECTIVES 1. To understand the dual nature of matter wave. 2. To apply the Schrodinger equation to different potential. 3. To understand the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation and its application. 4. To emphasize the significance of Harmonic Oscillator Potential and Hydrogen atom. Assessment Details: Cycle Test – I : 10 Marks Cycle Test – II : 10 Marks Model Exam : 20 Marks Assignments : 5 Marks Attendance : 5 Marks SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Third Year B.Sc Physics (2015-2016 Regulation) Total Course Semester Course Title L T P of C Code LTP II UPY15501 QUANTUM MECHANICS 4 1 - 5 4 UNIT I - WAVE NATURE OF MATTER Inadequacy of classical mechanics - Black body radiation - Quantum theory – Photo electric effect -Compton effect -Wave nature of matter-Expressions for de-Broglie wavelength - Davisson and Germer's experiment - G.P. Thomson experiment - Phase and group velocity and relation between them - Wave packet - Heisenberg's uncertainity principle – Its consequences (free electron cannot reside inside the nucleus and gamma ray microscope). UNIT II - QUANTUM POSTULATES Basic postulates of quantum mechanics - Schrodinger's equation - Time Independent -Time Dependant - Properties of wave function - Operator formalism – Energy - Momentum and Hamiltonian Operators - Interpretation of Wave Function - Probability Density and Probability - Conditions for Physical Acceptability of Wave Function -.
    [Show full text]
  • Piecewise Potentials II
    Physics 342 Lecture 13 Piecewise Potentials II Lecture 13 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, February 25th, 2008 We have seen a few different types of behavior for the stationary states of piecewise potentials { we can have oscillatory solutions on one or both sides of a potential discontinuity, we can also have growing and decaying exponentials. In general, we will select between the oscillatory and decaying exponential by choosing an energy scale for the stationary state. Our final pass at this subject will begin with a finite step, where we set up some matrix machinery to avoid the tedious algebra that accompanies boundary matching. Aside from the result, the important observation is that the matrix form we develop is independent of the potential, so that we can apply this type of approach to any potential, provided it does not extend to infinity. Remember the process we are going through over and over (and over): Given a potential, find the stationary states, use those to form the general solution to Schr¨odinger'sequation by appending the appropriate temporal factor −i E t (e ~ ), and exploit completeness to decompose some initial ¯(x) waveform. In practice, as should be evident from our studies so far, this program is sensible but difficult. The initial distribution of choice, a Gaussian, has unwieldy decomposition in bases other than ei k x (the natural, Fourier set) { is there another/easier way to get a basic idea of what an initial Gaussian distribution does when evolved in time under the influence of a potential? Yes, and we discuss the simplest possible numerical solution at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Probes for Minimum Length Estimation
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna Scuola di Scienze Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Fisica Quantum probes for minimum length estimation Relatore: Presentata da: Cristian Degli Esposti Boschi Alessandro Candeloro Correlatore: Matteo Paris Anno Accademico 2018/2019 Anche quando pare di poche spanne, un viaggio può restare senza ritorno. − Italo Calvino Abstract In this thesis we address the estimation of the minimum length arising from gravita- tional theories. In particular, we use tools from Quantum Estimation theory to provide bounds on precision and to assess the use of quantum probes to enhance the estima- tion performances. After a brief introduction to classical estimation theory and to its quantum counterparts, we introduce the concept of minimum length and show how it induces a perturbative term appearing in the Hamiltonian of any quantum system, which is proportional to a parameter depending on the minimum length. We have then system- atically studied the effects of this perturbation on different state preparations for several 1-dimensional systems, and evaluated the Quantum Fisher Information in order to find the ultimate bounds to the precision of any estimation procedure. Eventually, we have investigated the role of dimensionality on the precision, studying the 2-dimensional Har- monic oscillator. Our results provide a guideline to design possible future experiments to detect minimal length, and show the potential enhancement achievable using quantum probes. Acknowledgments Dal settembre del 2017 in cui ho intrapreso questo percorso, molte cose sono cambiate, sia a livello personale che scientifico. Vorrei ricordare e ringraziare chi è stato presente in questi due anni e ha contribuito direttamente o indirettamente a questo lavoro finale.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Time–Independent Schrödinger Equation
    Chapter 4 Time{Independent Schr¨odinger Equation 4.1 Stationary States We consider again the time dependent Schr¨odingerequation (Prop. 2.1) @ 2 i (t; x) = − ~ ∆ + V (x) (t; x) = H (t; x) ; (4.1) ~ @t 2m where the potential in the Hamiltonian is assumed to be time independent V = V (x). We calculate the solutions of this equation by using the method of separation of variables, i.e. we make the following ansatz for the solution (t; x): (t; x) = (x) f(t) (4.2) and insert it into the time dependent Schr¨odingerequation, Eq. (4.1), @ f(t) 2 @2 (x) 1 i (x) = − ~ f(t) + V (x) (x)f(t) j · ~ @t 2m @x2 (x) f(t) 1 df(t) 2 1 d2 (x) i = − ~ + V (x) : (4.3) ~ f(t) dt 2m (x) dx2 Since now the left hand side in Eq. (4.3) is only dependent on t and the right hand side only on x, both sides must be equal to a constant, which we will call E, and we can thus solve each side independently. The left side yields 1 df(t) df i i~ = E ) = − E dt f(t) dt f ~ i ) ln(f) = − E t + const. ) f = const. e−i E t =~ : (4.4) ~ The constant in Eq. (4.4) will later on be absorbed into (x). 69 70 CHAPTER 4. TIME{INDEPENDENT SCHRODINGER¨ EQUATION Then multiplying the right side of Eq. (4.3) with (x) we get 2 1 d2 (x) 2 d2 (x) − ~ + V (x) = E ) − ~ + V (x) (x) = E (x) : (4.5) 2m (x) dx2 2m dx2 | {z } H (x) The operators on the left express the Hamiltonian H acting on (x), which represents the time independent Schr¨odingerequation.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Exercises Notes
    Quantum Mechanics Exercises Notes Elijan Mastnak Winter Semester 2020-2021 About These Notes These are my notes from the Exercises portion of the class Kvanta Mehanika (Quantum Mechanics), a required course for third-year physics students at the Faculty of Math and Physics in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The exact problem sets herein are specific to the physics program at the University of Ljubljana, but the content is fairly standard for a late- undergraduate quantum mechanics course. I am making the notes publically available in the hope that they might help others learning similar material|the most recent version can be found on GitHub. Navigation: For easier document navigation, the table of contents is \clickable", meaning you can jump directly to a section by clicking the colored section names in the table of contents. Unfortunately, the clickable links do not work in most online or mobile PDF viewers; you have to download the file first. On Authorship: The exercises are led by Asst. Prof. TomaˇzRejec, who has assembled the problem sets and guides us through the solutions. Accordingly, credit for the problems in these notes goes to Prof. Rejec. I have merely typeset the problems and provided an additional explanation or two where I saw fit. Disclaimer: Mistakes|both trivial typos and legitimate errors|are likely. Keep in mind that these are the notes of an undergraduate student in the process of learning the material himself|take what you read with a grain of salt. If you find mistakes and feel like telling me, by Github pull request, email or some other means, I'll be happy to hear from you, even for the most trivial of errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finite Spherical Well „ Analog of 1-1-DD Finite Potential Well
    Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics Lecture 15: Angular momentum and Central Potentials http: //www.p hys ics.rutgers.e du /ugra d/361 Prof. Sean Oh Last time S. E. in 3D and in spherical coordinates For a mass μ moving in a central potential V( r) Solutions separated into angular and radial parts Rewrite this in terms of angular momentum of the system Angular Solutions Magnetic quantum number Associated Legendre functions Orbital angular quantum number Spherical harmonic functions Space Quantization The maggqnetic quantum number mll exppqresses the quantization of direction of L So L can assume only certain angles, given above, with respect to the zz--axis.axis. This is called space quantization. Example For a particle with l=2, what are the possible angels that L can make with the z -axis? Plot of Spherical harmonics “3D” plots of: 2 θ is measured from thihe +z axis Independent of φ So rotationally symmetric around zz--axisaxis These man ifest themselves as the ppyrobability distributions Summary: Quantization of L, Lz and space Reed: Chapter 6 Radial Solutions To find radial solutions: This is called the radial equation Solving the radial equation Note: Let’s introduce the auxiliary function: And plug it in above The Total Wavefunction The total wavefunction We will soon define n to be the quantum number that dictates the quantization of energy First let’s solve this for two simple cases Infinite and finite spherical wells Spher ica l ana logs o f par tic le in a box Interest in nuclear physics: nuclei modeled
    [Show full text]
  • Particle in an Infinite Potential Well
    PARTICLE IN AN INFINITE POTENTIAL WELL CYL100 2013{14 September 2013 We will now look at the solutions of a particle of mass m confined to move along the x-axis between 0 to L. This is achieved by making the potential 0 between x = 0 and x = L and V = 1 for x < 0 and x > L (see Figure 1). In quantum mechanics this model is referred to as particle in a box (PIB) of length L. Figure 1: The one-dimensional infinite potential well of length L. It is divided into three regions, with regions I and III having V = 1 and region II having V = 0 Before we set up and solve the Schr¨odingerequation let us apply de Broglie's approach to this problem. de Broglie associates a wave with every material particle traveling with momentum p. The wavelength of the wave is h λ = : dB p The classical analog of a particle in a box is a string that is fixed at both ends. When such a string is plucked, we know that the amplitude of the oscillations at the fixed ends is zero. In other words, an integer number of half-wavelengths must fit in the length of the box. Applying this idea to the present case, we find that λ h n dB = n = L n = 1; 2; ··· 2 2p Solving for p we get nh p = 2L The particle feels no potential energy so all its energy is in the form of kinetic energy. As a result p2 E = : 2m Substituting for p, we get n2h2 E = n = 1; 2; ··· n 8mL2 Let us now proceed to analyze this problem quantum mechanically.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Some One-Dimensional Potentials This “Tillegg” Is a Supplement to Sections 3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 in Hemmer’S Book
    TFY4215/FY1006 | Tillegg 3 1 TILLEGG 3 3. Some one-dimensional potentials This \Tillegg" is a supplement to sections 3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 in Hemmer's book. Sections marked with *** are not part of the introductory courses (FY1006 and TFY4215). 3.1 General properties of energy eigenfunctions (Hemmer 3.1, B&J 3.6) For a particle moving in a one-dimensional potential V (x), the energy eigenfunctions are the acceptable solutions of the time-independent Schr¨odingerequation Hc = E : h¯2 @2 ! d2 2m − + V (x) = E ; or = [V (x) − E] : (T3.1) 2m @x2 dx2 h¯2 3.1.a Energy eigenfunctions can be chosen real Locally, this second-order differential equation has two independent solutions. Since V (x) and E both are real, we can notice that if a solution (x) (with energy E) of this equation is complex, then both the real and the imaginary parts of this solution, 1 1 <e[ (x)] = [ (x) + ∗(x)] and =m[ (x)] = [ (x) − ∗(x)]; 2 2i will satisfy (T3.1), for the energy E. This means that we can choose to work with two independent real solutions, if we wish (instead of the complex solutions (x) and ∗(x)). An example: For a free particle (V (x) = 0), 1 p (x) = eikx; with k = 2mE h¯ is a solution with energy E. But then also ∗(x) = exp(−ikx) is a solution with the same energy. If we wish, we can therefore choose to work with the real and imaginary parts of (x), which are respectively cos kx and sin kx, cf particle in a box.
    [Show full text]